95-17193. Addition of Ottawa National Wildlife Refuge to the List of Open Areas for Big Game Hunting in Ohio  

  • [Federal Register Volume 60, Number 134 (Thursday, July 13, 1995)]
    [Proposed Rules]
    [Pages 36196-36197]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 95-17193]
    
    
    
    
    [[Page 36195]]
    
    _______________________________________________________________________
    
    Part IV
    
    
    
    
    
    Department of the Interior
    
    
    
    
    
    _______________________________________________________________________
    
    
    
    Fish and Wildlife Service
    
    
    
    _______________________________________________________________________
    
    
    
    50 CFR Part 32
    
    
    
    Addition of Ottawa National Wildlife Refuge to the List of Open Areas 
    for Big Game Hunting in Ohio; Proposed Rule
    
    Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 134 / Thursday, July 13, 1995 / 
    Proposed Rules 
    
    [[Page 36196]]
    
    
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
    
    Fish and Wildlife Service
    
    50 CFR Part 32
    
    RIN 1018-AD31
    
    
    Addition of Ottawa National Wildlife Refuge to the List of Open 
    Areas for Big Game Hunting in Ohio
    
    AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
    
    ACTION: Proposed rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) proposes to add 
    Ottawa National Wildlife Refuge to the list of areas open for big game 
    hunting in Ohio along with pertinent refuge-specific regulations for 
    such activities. The Service has determined that such use will be 
    compatible with the purposes for which the refuge was established. The 
    Service has further determined that this action is in accordance with 
    the provisions of all applicable laws, is consistent with principles of 
    sound wildlife management, and is otherwise in the public interest by 
    providing additional recreational opportunities of a renewable natural 
    resource.
    
    DATES: Comments may be submitted on or before September 11, 1995.
    
    ADDRESSES: Assistant Director--Refuges and Wildlife, U.S. Fish and 
    Wildlife Service, 1849 C Street, NW., MS 670 ARLSQ, Washington, DC 
    20240.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Duncan L. Brown, Esq., at the address 
    above; Telephone: 703-358-1744.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: National wildlife refuges are generally 
    closed to hunting and sport fishing until opened by rulemaking. The 
    Secretary of the Interior (Secretary) may open refuge areas to hunting 
    and/or fishing upon a determination that such uses are compatible with 
    the purpose(s) for which the refuge was established. The action must 
    also be in accordance with provisions of all laws applicable to the 
    areas, consistent with the principles of sound wildlife management, and 
    otherwise be in the public interest. This rulemaking proposes to open 
    Ottawa National Wildlife Refuge to big game (white-tailed deer) 
    hunting.
    
    Request for Comments
    
        Department of the Interior policy is, whenever practicable, to 
    afford the public a meaningful opportunity to participate in the 
    rulemaking process. A 60-day comment period is specified in order to 
    facilitate public input. Accordingly, interested persons may submit 
    written comments concerning this proposed rule to the person listed 
    above under the heading ADDRESSES. All substantive comments will be 
    reviewed and considered.
    Statutory Authority
    
        The National Wildlife Refuge System Administration Act of 1966, as 
    amended (NWRSAA) (16 U.S.C. 668dd), and the Refuge Recreation Act of 
    1962 (RRA) (16 U.S.C. 460k) govern the administration and public use of 
    national wildlife refuges. Specifically, Section 4(d)(1)(A) of the 
    NWRSAA authorizes the Secretary to permit the use of any areas within 
    the National Wildlife Refuge System (Refuge System) for any purpose, 
    including but not limited to hunting, fishing, public recreation and 
    accommodations, and access, when he determines that such uses are 
    compatible with the purposes for which each refuge was established. The 
    Service administers the Refuge System on behalf of the Secretary. The 
    RRA gives the Secretary additional authority to administer refuge areas 
    within the Refuge System for public recreation as an appropriate 
    incidental or secondary use only to the extent that it is practicable 
    and not inconsistent with the primary purposes for which the refuges 
    were established.
    
    Opening Package
    
        In preparation for this opening, the refuge unit has included in 
    its ``openings package'' for Regional review and approval from the 
    Washington Office the following documents: A hunting/fishing plan; an 
    environmental assessment; a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI); a 
    Section 7 evaluation or statement, pursuant to the Endangered Species 
    Act, that these openings are not likely to adversely affect a listed 
    species or its critical habitat; a letter of concurrence from the 
    affected States; and refuge-specific regulations to administer the 
    hunts. From a review of the totality of these documents, it has been 
    determined that the opening of the Ottawa National Wildlife Refuge to 
    big game hunting is compatible with the principles of sound wildlife 
    management and will otherwise be in the public interest.
        In accordance with the NWRSAA and the RRA, it has been also 
    determined that this opening for big game hunting is compatible and 
    consistent with the primary purposes for which the refuge was 
    established. A brief description of the hunting program is as follows:
    
    Ottawa National Wildlife Refuge
    
        The Ottawa National Wildlife Refuge (NWR) is situated on the 
    southwestern edge of Lake Erie in what was once part of a 300,000 acre 
    forested wetland known as the Great Black Swamp. Approximately 10% of 
    the original habitat exists--mostly as modified, impounded wetland 
    units formerly owned by agricultural or sport-hunting interests. Ottawa 
    NWR was established on July 28, 1961, with land acquired under the 
    authority of the Migratory Bird Conservation Act. The primary purpose 
    of the refuge is for use as an inviolate sanctuary, or for any other 
    management purpose, and for administration of areas of land, water, or 
    interest therein to conserve and protect migratory birds in accordance 
    with treaty obligations * * * and [to conserve] other species of 
    wildlife found therein, including adequate wildlife habitat.
        The total refuge acreage is 8,318 acres of which 5,350 acres are 
    either open pools, marsh, or moist soil units. The remaining acreage is 
    a mixture of grassland and shrubland, fallow fields, wet meadows, 
    forests (310 acres), and croplands (600 acres).
        Ottawa NWR is an important migration stopover for migratory birds. 
    The refuge bird list contains 267 normally observed species. The refuge 
    supports 32 native mammal species along with 53 indigenous amphibian 
    and reptile species.
        Public hunting is to be used primarily as a management tool for 
    balancing the white-tailed deer population objectives with other 
    wildlife objectives, thereby inhibiting this species from impacting the 
    quality of vegetative habitat. In addition, the proposed hunt will 
    provide limited public hunting opportunities on the refuge. The deer 
    population estimate at the refuge was determined from a winter 
    helicopter survey. The refuge estimates indicate that the current deer 
    population is at 47.3 deer per square mile. In Ohio, the buck harvest 
    estimates indicate a pre-harvest density for Lucas and Ottawa counties 
    of 0.6 and 0.9 deer per square mile. The refuge population estimate is 
    315% above the upper end of average densities reported for the 
    agricultural Midwest region. Wildlife managers expend a lot of time and 
    money responding to deer-vehicle accident and crop depredation 
    complaints. Without a hunting program specifically used as a management 
    tool, the refuge deer population may degrade habitat quality not only 
    for that population but other important species. Controlled access, 
    blind placement and hunting opportunity in designated management zones 
    and seasonal restrictions will limit human disturbance of wildlife and 
    
    [[Page 36197]]
    provide wildlife a refuge interior sanctuary.
        Opening the refuge to big game hunting has been found to be 
    compatible in a separate compatibility determination. The hunting 
    program will be reviewed annually to ensure that a harvestable surplus 
    of animals exist, and that sensitive habitats are protected from 
    disturbance. A Section 7 evaluation pursuant to the Endangered Species 
    Act was conducted. It was determined that the proposed action is not 
    likely to adversely affect any Federally listed or proposed for listing 
    threatened or endangered species or their critical habitats. Pursuant 
    to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), an environmental 
    assessment was made and a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) was 
    made regarding the hunt. During the preparation of the environmental 
    assessment, biologists and management personnel within the Ohio 
    Division of Wildlife were consulted. Comments were solicited from the 
    public during the draft environmental assessment phase. Articles on 
    this assessment were carried in the local newspapers and sent to 
    Federal, State and local legislators and conservation groups.
        The Service has determined that there would be sufficient funds to 
    administer the proposed hunt. Sufficient funds would be available 
    within the refuge unit budget to operate such a hunt as proposed.
    Paperwork Reduction Act
    
        The information collection requirements for part 32 are found in 50 
    CFR part 25 and have been approved by the Office of Management and 
    Budget under 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. and assigned clearance number 1018-
    0014. The information is being collected to assist the Service in 
    administering these programs in accordance with statutory authorities 
    which require that recreational uses be compatible with the primary 
    purposes for which the areas were established. The information 
    requested in the application form is required to obtain a benefit.
        The public reporting burden for the application form is estimated 
    to average six (6) minutes per response, including time for reviewing 
    instructions, gathering and maintaining data, and completing the form. 
    Direct comments on the burden estimate or any other aspect of this form 
    to the Service Information Collection Officer, U.S. Fish and Wildlife 
    Service, 1849 C Street, NW, MS 224 ARLSQ, Washington, DC 20240; and the 
    Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (1018-
    0014), Washington, DC 20503.
    
    Economic Effect
    
        This rulemaking was not subject to Office of Management and Budget 
    review under Executive Order 12866. In addition, a review under the 
    Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) has revealed 
    that the rulemaking would not have a significant effect on a 
    substantial number of small entities, which include businesses, 
    organizations or governmental jurisdictions. While there would be an 
    increase in the sale of firearms, ammunition, hunting gear, etc., this 
    proposed rule would have minimal effect on such entities as this is not 
    a big hunting program and hunting is otherwise allowed in surrounding 
    areas.
    
    Federalism
    
        This proposed rule will not have substantial direct effects on the 
    States, on the relationship between the national government and the 
    States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the 
    various levels of government. Therefore, in accordance with Executive 
    Order 12612, it is determined that this rule does not have sufficient 
    Federalism implications to warrant the preparation of a Federalism 
    Assessment.
    
    Environmental Considerations
    
        Pursuant to the requirements of section 102(2)(C) of the National 
    Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(C)), an 
    environmental assessment has been prepared for this opening. Based upon 
    the Environmental Assessments, the Service issued a Finding of No 
    Significant Impact with respect to the opening. A Section 7 evaluation 
    was prepared pursuant to the Endangered Species Act with a finding that 
    no adverse impact would occur to any identified threatened or 
    endangered species.
    
        Primary Author. Duncan L. Brown, Esq., Division of Refuges, U.S. 
    Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC, is the primary author of 
    this rulemaking document.
    
    List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 32
    
        Hunting, Fishing, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, 
    Wildlife, Wildlife refuges.
    
        Accordingly, part 32 of chapter I of Title 50 of the Code of 
    Federal Regulations is proposed to be amended as set forth below:
    
    PART 32---[AMENDED]
    
        1. The authority citation for part 32 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 16 U.S.C. 460k, 664, 668dd, and 715i.
    
        2. Section 32.54 Ohio is amended by revising paragraph C. of Ottawa 
    National Wildlife Refuge to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 32.54  Ohio.
    
    * * * * *
    
    Ottawa National Wildlife Refuge
    
    * * * * *
        C. Big Game Hunting. Hunting of white-tailed deer is permitted 
    on designated areas of the refuge subject to the following 
    conditions:
        1. Permits are required.
        2. Hunters are required to check in and out of the refuge each 
    day that they hunt.
        3. No shooting from refuge roads or dikes is permitted.
    * * * * *
        Dated: June 15, 1995.
    George T. Frampton, Jr.,
    Assistant Secretary for Fish and Wildlife and Parks.
    [FR Doc. 95-17193 Filed 7-12-95; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4310-55-P
    
    

Document Information

Published:
07/13/1995
Department:
Fish and Wildlife Service
Entry Type:
Proposed Rule
Action:
Proposed rule.
Document Number:
95-17193
Dates:
Comments may be submitted on or before September 11, 1995.
Pages:
36196-36197 (2 pages)
RINs:
1018-AD31
PDF File:
95-17193.pdf
CFR: (1)
50 CFR 32.54