98-18571. Notice of Issuance of Decisions and Orders During the Week of May 18 Through May 22, 1998  

  • [Federal Register Volume 63, Number 133 (Monday, July 13, 1998)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 37562-37563]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 98-18571]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
    
    Office of Hearings and Appeals
    
    
    Notice of Issuance of Decisions and Orders During the Week of May 
    18 Through May 22, 1998
    
        During the week of May 18 through May 22, 1998, the decisions and 
    orders summarized below were issued with respect to appeals, 
    applications, petitions, or other requests filed with the Office of 
    Hearings and Appeals of the Department of Energy. The following summary 
    also contains a list of submissions that were dismissed by the Office 
    of Hearings and Appeals.
        Copies of the full text of these decisions and orders are available 
    in the Public Reference Room of the Office of Hearings and Appeals, 950 
    L'Enfant Plaza, SW, Washington, DC, Monday through Friday, except 
    federal holidays. They are also available in Energy Management: Federal 
    Energy Guidelines, a commercially published loose leaf reporter system. 
    Some decisions and orders are available on the Office of Hearings and 
    Appeals World Wide Web site at http://www.oha.doe.gov.
    
        Dated: July 6, 1998.
    George B. Breznay,
    Director, Office of Hearings and Appeals.
    
    Decision List No. 86; Week of May 18 Through May 22, 1998
    
    Appeals
    
    James E. Minter, 5/18/98, VFA-0406
    
        James E. Minter filed an Appeal from a determination issued to him 
    by the Albuquerque Operations of the Department of Energy (DOE) in 
    response to a Request for Information submitted under the Freedom of 
    Information Act (FOIA). Mr. Minter's request sought records of overtime 
    payments to a DOE employee who, as allegedly part of his job 
    requirements, may have engaged in
    
    [[Page 37563]]
    
    physical fitness training while on official travel. The Albuquerque 
    Operations Office identified a trip report and a time-card as 
    responsive to the request, but withheld the information on personal 
    grounds under FOIA Exemption 6. In considering the Appeal, the DOE 
    determined that absent special circumstances or information that 
    reveals something personal or private about the individual, Federal 
    Government employees generally have no privacy interest either in their 
    official work performed as a government employee either at or away from 
    their usual duty stations or in their aggregate amount of hours spent 
    working for the government even if this includes overtime. Accordingly, 
    the Appeal was denied in part, granted in part, and remanded to the 
    Albuquerque Operations Office to either release the withheld 
    information or to issue a new determination offering another 
    justification for withholding the information.
    
    Kramer, Rayson, Leake, Rodgers & Morgan, 5/18/98, VFA-0402
    
        The DOE's Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) issued a decision 
    denying a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Appeal filed by Kramer, 
    Rayson, Leake, Rodgers & Morgan (Kramer). In response to Kramer's FOIA 
    request for information about a third party, the DOE Office of 
    Inspector General (OIG) stated that it could neither confirm nor deny 
    the existence of responsive material (a Glomar response). In its 
    decision, OHA found that OIG properly used Exception 7(C) and the 
    Glomar response to protect the identified privacy rights of the 
    individual, which were found to outweigh any public interest in the 
    information. Accordingly, the Appeal was denied.
    
    Whistleblower Hearing
    
    Thomas T. Tiller, 5/21/98, VWA-0018
    
        A Hearing Officer issued an Initial Agency Decision concerning a 
    whistleblower complaint. The Hearing Officer determined that Thomas T. 
    Tiller (Tiller) made one protected disclosure and proved by a 
    preponderance of the evidence that the protected disclosure was a 
    contributing factor to his demotion and reassignment. The Hearing 
    Officer determined, however, that Wackenhut Services, Incorporated 
    (Wackenhut), a DOE contractor, provided clear and convincing evidence 
    to demonstrate that it would have demoted and reassigned Tiller even if 
    he had not made his protected disclosure. The Hearing Officer also 
    determined that Tiller participated in a protected activity when he 
    filed his Part 708 Complaint in August 1994. She further determined 
    that Tiller's 1994 complaint filing contributed to the pattern of 
    alleged discriminatory acts set forth in his 1996 Whistleblower 
    Complaint. The Hearing Officer determined, however, that Wackenhut 
    proved by clear and convincing evidence that it would have taken the 
    actions enumerated in Tiller's 1996 Whistleblower Complaint even if 
    Tiller had not filed his 1994 Whistleblower Complaint. Therefore, the 
    Hearing Officer found that Tiller failed to establish the existence of 
    any violations of the DOE's Contractor Employee Protection Program for 
    which relief is warranted under 10 CFR Sec. 708.10.
    
    Refund Applications
    
    Better Materials Inc., 5/21/98, RF272-94734
    
        The DOE denied an Application for Refund filed in the Subpart V 
    Crude Oil proceeding because the applicant's wholly owned subsidiary 
    had received a refund from the Surface Transporters Escrow.
    
    Gulf Oil Corp./U.S. Reduction, 5/18/98, RR300-00293
    
        The DOE granted a motion for reconsideration filed by in connection 
    with Gulf Oil Corp./U.S. Reduction, Case No. RF300-20907 (June 6, 
    1994). The DOE determined that the applicant, The Travelers Group, 
    Inc., was entitled to an additional refund of $1,796.
    
    Refund Applications
    
        The Office of Hearings and Appeals issued the following Decisions 
    and Orders concerning refund applications, which are not summarized. 
    Copies of the full texts of the Decisions and Orders are available in 
    the Public Reference Room of the Office of Hearings and Appeals.
    
    Annco Partnership et al..................................  RK272-01898                                   5/21/98
    Betz Laboratories, Inc...................................  RF272-98945                                   5/21/98
    Leatham Brothers, Inc. et al.............................  RF272-95231                                   5/19/98
    Masterson Company, Inc. et al............................  RF272-94589                                   5/19/98
    S.A.D. #22 et al.........................................  RF272-95369                                   5/21/98
                                                                                                                    
    
    Dismissals
    
        The following submissions were dismissed.
    
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                         Name                               Case No.        
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Burlin McKinney..............................  VFA-0418                 
    Liberty Cash Grocers, Inc....................  RK272-04779              
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    [FR Doc. 98-18571 Filed 7-10-98; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
07/13/1998
Department:
Hearings and Appeals Office, Interior Department
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
98-18571
Pages:
37562-37563 (2 pages)
PDF File:
98-18571.pdf