94-17147. Withdrawal Of Proposed Customs Regulations Amendments Relating To Prefiling Of Entry Documentation  

  • [Federal Register Volume 59, Number 135 (Friday, July 15, 1994)]
    [Unknown Section]
    [Page 0]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 94-17147]
    
    
    [[Page Unknown]]
    
    [Federal Register: July 15, 1994]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
    
    Customs Service
    
    19 CFR Parts 141 and 142
    
    RIN 1515-AB21
    
     
    
    Withdrawal Of Proposed Customs Regulations Amendments Relating To 
    Prefiling Of Entry Documentation
    
    AGENCY: U.S. Customs Service, Department of the Treasury.
    
    ACTION: Notice of withdrawal.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This document withdraws proposed amendments to the Customs 
    Regulations which would have limited the privilege of prefiling 
    merchandise entry documentation to participants in the Automated Broker 
    Interface and to other entry filers where the carrier participates in, 
    or where transmission is otherwise through, the Automated Manifest 
    System. Customs has determined that the proposals should be withdrawn 
    based on concerns expressed by the trade community and because Customs 
    is not presently in a position to make the programming changes that 
    would be necessary to implement the proposals.
    
    DATES: Withdrawal effective July 15, 1994.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ernie Cunningham, Office of Inspection 
    and Control (202-927-0167).
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    Background
    
        On November 6, 1991, Customs published in the Federal Register (56 
    FR 56608) an Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking stating that Customs 
    was considering amending Parts 141 and 142 of the Customs Regulations 
    (19 CFR Parts 141 and 142) to limit merchandise entry prefiling (that 
    is, prior to arrival of the merchandise) privileges to: (1) entries 
    filed by entry filers who are participants in the Automated Broker 
    Interface (ABI); and (2) entries filed by non-ABI entry filers for 
    merchandise that is transported on carriers that are participants in 
    the Automated Manifest System (AMS). The document also gave advance 
    notice that if this proposal is adopted, Customs would within six 
    months of its adoption release selectivity results (that is, a 
    determination whether a general or intensive examination of merchandise 
    is necessary) prior to carriers' arrival only to entry filers whose 
    merchandise is transported on carriers that are participants in AMS. 
    Thus, in effect, while entry filers who are participants in ABI could 
    continue to prefile, provisional releases would only be issued by 
    Customs for merchandise transported on AMS carriers. The document 
    invited the public to submit written comments to assist Customs in 
    determining whether to proceed further with these proposals.
        On December 13, 1993, Customs published in the Federal Register (58 
    FR 65135) a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking which, after discussing the 
    public comments submitted in response to the Advance Notice of Proposed 
    Rulemaking and noting that no regulatory change was necessary to 
    implement the proposal to narrow the category of entry filers to whom 
    selectivity results would be released prior to arrival, set forth 
    specific proposals to amend Secs. 141.68(a)(3) and 142.2(b)(1) of the 
    Customs Regulations (19 CFR 141.68(a)(3) and 142.2(b)(1)). The proposed 
    amendment to Sec. 141.68(a)(3) consisted essentially of a cross-
    reference to Sec. 142.2(b)(1), and the proposed amendment to 
    Sec. 142.2(b)(1) involved setting forth three circumstances in which 
    entry documentation may be submitted before the merchandise arrives 
    within the limits of the port where entry is to be made. The first two 
    circumstances were essentially as outlined in the Advance Notice of 
    Proposed Rulemaking. The third circumstance, added in response to a 
    public comment, involved cases where, regardless of whether the carrier 
    transporting the merchandise for which the entry documentation is filed 
    is an AMS participant, there is an AMS transmission through the Express 
    Consignment Module of Air AMS regarding that carrier. The Notice of 
    Proposed Rulemaking invited public comments on the proposals which 
    would be considered before adoption of the proposals, and the public 
    comment period closed on February 11, 1994.
        Ten letters were received setting forth comments on the proposed 
    regulatory amendments. Although the majority of these commenters 
    supported, in principle, one of the underlying Customs goals of 
    encouraging carriers to automate, a number of these commenters were of 
    the view that practical considerations militated against implementation 
    of the proposals under present circumstances. The cited circumstances 
    included the need for modifications to Air and Sea AMS to deal with 
    continuing operational problems, the need to provide access to AMS 
    through ABI, and the need to address the lack of adequate participation 
    in Air AMS on the part of freight forwarders and deconsolidators. Some 
    commenters objected in principle to the approach of encourging one 
    group to do something by taking a benefit away from another group, and 
    other commenters stated that the proposals would put small trucking 
    operators and small customs brokers at a competitive disadvantage vis-
    a-vis larger entities that can more easily support the expense of 
    becoming operational in AMS and ABI.
        Customs believes that the comments submitted in response to the 
    Notice of Proposed Rulemaking raise important issues that must be more 
    fully addressed before the published proposals are adopted. Those 
    comments, as well as further internal review of this matter by Customs, 
    demonstrate that the proposed changes to the existing prefiling policy 
    would require extensive programming changes in selectivity, AMS, the 
    Automated Air Arrival/Departure Log, and the yet to be developed 
    Automated Sea Arrival/Departure Log. Due to other programming 
    priorities, including the need to address unresolved problems in Air 
    AMS, and because of the unavailability of adequate personnel and 
    budgetary resources to devote to the task, Customs is not at the 
    present time in a position to pursue such large-scale programming 
    changes. Accordingly, the proposals set forth in the document published 
    in the Federal Register at 58 FR 65135 on December 13, 1993, are hereby 
    withdrawn.
    George J. Weise,
    Commissioner of Customs.
        Approved: June 24, 1994.
    John P. Simpson,
    Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Treasury.
    [FR Doc. 94-17147 Filed 7-14-94; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4820-02-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
7/15/1994
Published:
07/15/1994
Department:
Customs Service
Entry Type:
Uncategorized Document
Action:
Notice of withdrawal.
Document Number:
94-17147
Dates:
Withdrawal effective July 15, 1994.
Pages:
0-0 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Federal Register: July 15, 1994
RINs:
1515-AB21