94-17242. Table Grapes Grown In Southeastern California and Table Grapes Imported Into the United States; Revision in Minimum Grade Requirements  

  • [Federal Register Volume 59, Number 135 (Friday, July 15, 1994)]
    [Unknown Section]
    [Page 0]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 94-17242]
    
    
    [[Page Unknown]]
    
    [Federal Register: July 15, 1994]
    
    
                                                       VOL. 59, NO. 135
    
                                                  Friday, July 15, 1994
    
    DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
    
    Agricultural Marketing Service
    
    7 CFR Parts 925 and 944
    
    [Docket No. FV93-925-1PR]
    
     
    
    Table Grapes Grown In Southeastern California and Table Grapes 
    Imported Into the United States; Revision in Minimum Grade Requirements
    
    AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
    
    ACTION: Proposed rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This proposal invites comments on changes in the minimum 
    quality requirements currently in effect for table grapes grown in 
    southeastern California under Marketing Order No. 925 and for table 
    grapes imported into the United States. This proposed rule would allow 
    for the handling of grapes which satisfy all the requirements of the 
    U.S. No. 1 Institutional grade except for bunch size tolerance. The 
    objective of this proposal is to aid handlers and importers in the 
    marketing of grapes which do not meet the U.S. No. 1 Institutional 
    grade because of a greater variance in bunch size.
    
    DATES: Comments must be received by August 1, 1994.
    
    ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments 
    concerning this proposal. Comments must be sent in triplicate to the 
    Docket Clerk, Fruit and Vegetable Division, AMS, USDA, P.O. Box 96456, 
    Room 2523-S, Washington, DC 20090-6456. All comments should reference 
    the docket number and the date and page number of this issue of the 
    Federal Register and will be made available for public inspection in 
    the Office of the Docket Clerk during regular business hours.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peter I. Parks, California Marketing 
    Field Office, Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit and 
    Vegetable Division, AMS, USDA, 2202 Monterey Street, Suite 102B, 
    Fresno, California 93721, telephone (209) 487-5901; or Charles L. Rush, 
    Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Division, 
    AMS, USDA, P.O. Box 96456, Room 2523-S, Washington, DC 20090-6456, 
    telephone (202) 720-5127.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This proposed rule is issued under Marketing 
    Agreement and Order No. 925 [7 CFR part 925], regulating the handling 
    of grapes grown in a designated area of southeastern California. The 
    marketing agreement and order are authorized under the Agricultural 
    Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended [7 U.S.C. 601-674], 
    hereinafter referred to as the Act.
        This proposed rule is also issued pursuant to section 8e of the 
    Act, which requires the Secretary of Agriculture to issue grade, size, 
    quality, or maturity requirements for certain listed commodities 
    imported into the United States that are the same as, or comparable to, 
    those imposed upon the domestic commodities under Federal marketing 
    orders. Table grapes were added to the list of commodities specified in 
    section 8e in 1982.
        The Department of Agriculture (Department) is issuing this rule in 
    conformance with Executive Order 12866.
        This proposal has been reviewed under Executive Order 12778, Civil 
    Justice Reform. This action is not intended to have retroactive effect. 
    This proposal will not preempt any State or local laws, regulations, or 
    policies, unless they present an irreconcilable conflict with this 
    action.
        The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted 
    before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the 
    Act, any handler subject to an order may file with the Secretary a 
    petition stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any 
    obligation imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance 
    with law and requesting a modification of the order or to be exempted 
    therefrom. A handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the 
    petition. After the hearing the Secretary would rule on the petition. 
    The Act provides that the district court of the United States in any 
    district in which the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her 
    principal place of business, has jurisdiction in equity to review the 
    Secretary's ruling on the petition, provided a bill in equity is filed 
    not later than 20 days after date of the entry of the ruling.
        There are no administrative procedures which must be exhausted 
    prior to any judicial challenge to the provisions of import regulations 
    issued under section 8e of the Act.
        Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility 
    Act (RFA), the Administrator of the Agricultural Marketing Service 
    (AMS) has considered the economic impact of this action on small 
    entities.
        The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of 
    business subject to such actions in order that small businesses will 
    not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued 
    pursuant to the Act, and rules issued thereunder, are unique in that 
    they are brought about through group action of essentially small 
    entities acting on their own behalf. Thus, both statutes have small 
    entity orientation and compatibility. Import regulations issued under 
    the Act are based on those established under Federal marketing orders.
        There are approximately 20 handlers of California desert grapes 
    subject to regulation under the marketing order, and approximately 90 
    producers. In addition, there are approximately 70 importers of table 
    grapes subject to the requirements of the table grape import 
    regulation. Small agricultural service firms, which include handlers 
    and importers, have been defined by the Small Business Administration 
    [13 CFR 121.601] as those having annual receipts of less than 
    $3,500,000, and small agricultural producers are defined as those whose 
    annual receipts are less than $500,000. The majority of the table grape 
    handlers, producers and importers may be classified as small entities.
        Under the marketing order, table grapes grown in southeastern 
    California are currently subject to a minimum grade requirement of U.S. 
    No. 1 or U.S. No. 1 Institutional, as set forth in the United States 
    Standards for Grades of Table Grapes (European or Vinifera Type) 
    (Standards). The requirements of the U.S. No. 1 Institutional grade are 
    the same as those of the U.S. No. 1 grade, with two exceptions. The 
    first relates to bunch size. Under the U.S. No. 1 grade, there is a 
    minimum bunch size requirement of 4 ounces. Under the U.S. No. 1 
    Institutional grade, bunches must weigh at least 2 ounces but not more 
    than 5 ounces. The second difference is that at least 95 percent of the 
    containers in a lot of grapes grading U.S. No. 1 Institutional must be 
    legibly marked ``Institutional Pack,'' whereas no such marking 
    requirement applies under the U.S. No. 1 grade. In order to allow for 
    variations incident to proper grading and handling, both grades provide 
    a tolerance of 8 percent for off-size bunches and for bunches and 
    berries failing to meet other grade requirements.
        The California Desert Grape Administrative Committee (committee), 
    the agency responsible for local administration of the order, met on 
    November 4, 1993, and unanimously recommended relaxing the quality 
    requirements in the handling regulations to allow an additional bunch 
    size tolerance for grapes which would otherwise grade U.S. No. 1 
    Institutional. This proposal would provide an additional tolerance of 
    25 percent, or a total of 33 percent, for bunches of grapes that would 
    otherwise meet the U.S. No. 1 Institutional grade.
        Prior to the 1992 season, the minimum grade requirement in effect 
    under the order was U.S. No. 1 grade. The U.S. No. 1 Institutional 
    grade was authorized as a means of allowing the industry to fulfill 
    demands of the foodservice industry (e.g., restaurants and schools) for 
    smaller sized bunches of grapes than are preferred in other markets. 
    However, the domestic table grape industry has experienced difficulty 
    in meeting the requirements of the U.S. No. 1 Institutional grade due 
    to the 8 percent tolerance for off-sized bunches. The committee 
    believes that establishing an additional tolerance for off-sized 
    bunches in the handling regulation will promote sales of grapes packed 
    for institutional use. Due to the requirements of the current handling 
    regulation, California table grape handlers are unable to ship smaller 
    grape bunches because of the 8 percent off-size bunch tolerance of the 
    U.S. No. 1 Institutional grade. This has required handlers to repack 
    grapes after they have been packed in the vineyards, resulting in 
    packing costs that are prohibitively high for the modest prices paid by 
    buyers of institutional grade grapes. Allowing an additional 25 percent 
    bunch size tolerance is expected to allow the industry to more fully 
    utilize its grapes in the marketplace. This proposal would allow 
    handlers to mark containers of grapes meeting the modified requirements 
    as proposed herein as ``DGAC No. 1 Institutional.''
        In accordance with section 8e of the Act, table grapes imported 
    into the United States are subject to the same minimum grade 
    requirements as those in effect for domestically grown grapes under the 
    marketing order. Those requirements are found in Table Grape Import 
    Regulation 4 [7 CFR part 944.503]. Because this proposed rule would 
    provide an additional tolerance for off-size bunches of grapes under 
    the domestic handling regulation, the same change is being proposed 
    under the table grape import regulation.
        Finally, this rule would also update references to government 
    contacts and sources of regulatory information in both the domestic and 
    import regulations.
        Based on available information, the Administrator of the AMS has 
    determined that this action would not have a significant economic 
    impact on a substantial number of small entities.
        Interested persons are invited to submit comments on this proposal. 
    A 15-day comment period is considered appropriate because this action 
    would relax requirements currently in effect, and to be of maximum 
    benefit it should be in effect as soon as possible since the 1994 
    shipping season began on April 20.
        In accordance with section 8e of the Act, the United States Trade 
    Representative has concurred with the issuance of this proposed rule.
    
    List of Subjects
    
    7 CFR Part 925
    
        Grapes, Marketing agreements, Reporting and recordkeeping 
    requirements.
    
    7 CFR Part 944
    
        Avocados, Food grades and standards, Grapefruit, Grapes, Imports, 
    Kiwifruit, Limes, Olives, Oranges.
    
        For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 7 CFR Parts 925 and 944 
    are proposed to be amended as follows:
        1. The authority citation for both 7 CFR Parts 925 and 944 
    continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601-674.
    
    PART 925--GRAPES GROWN IN A DESIGNATED AREA OF SOUTHEASTERN 
    CALIFORNIA
    
        2. Section 925.304 is amended by revising paragraph (a) to read as 
    follows:
    
    
    Sec. 925.304   California Desert Grape Regulation 6.
    
        (a) Grade, size, and maturity. Except as provided under paragraphs 
    (a)(1) and (a)(2) of this section, such grapes shall meet the minimum 
    grade and size requirements of U.S. No. 1 Table, or U.S. No. 1 
    Institutional, as set forth in the United States Standards for Grades 
    of Table Grapes (European or Vinifera Type, 7 CFR 51.880 through 
    51.913) (Standards), or shall meet all the requirements of U.S. No. 1 
    Institutional with the exception of the tolerance percentage for bunch 
    size. Such tolerance shall be 33 percent instead of 8 percent as is 
    required to meet U.S. No. 1 Institutional grade. Grapes meeting these 
    quality requirements may be marked ``DGAC No. 1 Institutional'' but 
    shall not be marked ``Institutional Pack.''
        (1) Grapes of the Perlette variety shall meet the minimum berry 
    size requirement of ten-sixteenths of an inch;
        (2) Grapes of the Flame Seedless variety shall meet the minimum 
    berry size requirement of ten-sixteenths of an inch; shall be 
    considered mature if the juice contains not less than 15 percent 
    soluble solids and the soluble solids are equal to or in excess of 20 
    parts to every part acid contained in the juice in accordance with 
    applicable sampling and testing procedures specified in sections 
    1436.3, 1436.5, 1436.6, 1436.7, 1436.12, and 1436.17 of Article 25 of 
    the California Administrative Code [Title 3].
    * * * * *
        3. Section 925.304(f) is amended by removing the zip code ``20250'' 
    and adding in its place ``20090-6456'' and by removing the phone number 
    ``(202) 447-5697'' and adding in its place ``(202) 720-2491''.
    
    PART 944--FRUITS, IMPORT REGULATIONS
    
        4. Section 944.503 is amended by revising paragraph (a)(1) to read 
    as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 944.503  Table Grape Import Regulation 4.
    
        (a)(1) Pursuant to section 8e of the Act and Part 944--Fruits, 
    Import Regulations, the importation into the United States of any 
    variety of vinifera species table grapes, except Emperor, Calmeria, 
    Almeria, and Ribier varieties, is prohibited unless such grapes meet 
    the minimum grade and size requirements specified in 7 CFR 51.884 for 
    U.S. No. 1 Table or in 7 CFR 51.885 for U.S. No. 1 Institutional grade, 
    as set forth in the United States Standards for Grades of Table Grapes 
    (European or Vinifera Type, 7 CFR 51.880 through 51.913), or shall meet 
    all the requirements of U.S. No. 1 Institutional with the exception of 
    the tolerance percentage for bunch size. Such tolerance shall be 33 
    percent instead of 8 percent as is required to meet U.S. No. 1 
    Institutional grade. Grapes meeting these quality requirements shall 
    not be marked ``Institutional Pack, but may be marked DGAC No.1 
    Institutional.''
        (1) Grapes of the Perlette variety shall meet the minimum berry 
    size requirement of ten-sixteenths of an inch, and
        (2) Grapes of the Flame Seedless variety shall meet the minimum 
    berry size requirement of ten-sixteenths of an inch and shall be 
    considered mature if the juice contains not less than 15 percent 
    soluble solids and the soluble solids are equal to or in excess of 20 
    parts to every part acid contained in the juice in accordance with 
    applicable sampling and testing procedures specified in sections 
    1436.3, 1436.5, 1436.6, 1436.7, 1436.12, and 1436.17 of Article 25 of 
    the California Administrative Code (Title 3).
     * * * * *
        5. Section 944.503(a)(2) is amended by removing the zip code 
    ``20250'' and adding in its place ``20090-6456'' and by removing the 
    phone number ``(202) 447-5697'' and adding in its place ``(202) 720-
    2491.''
    
        Dated: July 11, 1994.
    Robert C. Keeney,
    Deputy Director, Fruit and Vegetable Division.
    [FR Doc. 94-17242 Filed 7-14-94; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 3410-02-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
07/15/1994
Department:
Agricultural Marketing Service
Entry Type:
Uncategorized Document
Action:
Proposed rule.
Document Number:
94-17242
Dates:
Comments must be received by August 1, 1994.
Pages:
0-0 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Federal Register: July 15, 1994, Docket No. FV93-925-1PR
CFR: (2)
7 CFR 925.304
7 CFR 944.503