98-18862. Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Colorado; 1993 Periodic Carbon Monoxide Emission Inventories for Colorado  

  • [Federal Register Volume 63, Number 135 (Wednesday, July 15, 1998)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 38087-38089]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 98-18862]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    
    40 CFR Part 52
    
    [CO-001-0024a; FRL-6124-4]
    
    
    Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; 
    Colorado; 1993 Periodic Carbon Monoxide Emission Inventories for 
    Colorado
    
    AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
    
    ACTION: Direct final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: EPA is approving a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision 
    submitted by the State of Colorado on September 16, 1997. The effect of 
    this action is to approve 1993 periodic carbon monoxide (CO) emission 
    inventories for Colorado Springs, Denver, Fort Collins, and Longmont 
    that were submitted by the Governor, as a revision to the State 
    Implementation Plan (SIP), as required by section 187(a)(5) of the 
    Clean Air Act (CAA), as amended in 1990. This action is being taken 
    under section 110 of the CAA.
    
    DATES: This direct final rule is effective on September 14, 1998 
    without further notice, unless EPA receives adverse comments by August 
    14, 1998. If adverse comments are received, EPA will publish a timely 
    withdrawal of the direct final rule in the Federal Register and inform 
    the public that the rule will not take effect.
    
    ADDRESSES: Written comments may be mailed to Richard R. Long, Director, 
    Air Program, Mailcode 8P2-A, Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), 
    Region VIII, 999 18th Street, Suite 500, Denver, Colorado, 80202. 
    Copies of the documents relevant to this action are available for 
    public inspection during normal business hours at the Air Program, 
    Environmental Protection Agency, Region VIII, 999 18th Street, Suite 
    500, Denver, Colorado, 80202. Copies of the State documents relevant to 
    this action are available for public inspection at the Colorado 
    Department of Public Health and Environment, Air Pollution Control 
    Division, 4300 Cherry Creek Drive South, Denver, Colorado 80246-1530.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cindy Rosenberg, EPA, Region VIII, 
    (303) 312-6436.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On September 16, 1997, the State of Colorado 
    submitted a formal revision to its State Implementation Plan (SIP). The 
    SIP revision consists of the 1993 periodic carbon monoxide (CO) 
    emission inventories for Colorado Springs, Denver, Fort Collins, and 
    Longmont.
    
    I. Background
    
        As required by the CAA, States have the responsibility to inventory 
    emissions contributing to NAAQS nonattainment, to track these emissions 
    over time, and to ensure that control strategies are being implemented 
    that reduce emissions and move areas towards attainment. The CAA 
    required States with moderate or serious CO nonattainment areas to 
    initially submit a base year CO inventory that represented actual 
    emissions during the peak CO season by November 15, 1992. This base 
    year inventory was for calendar year 1990. Moderate and serious CO 
    nonattainment areas were also required to submit a revised emissions 
    inventory periodically. The 1990 base year inventory was to serve as 
    the primary inventory from which the periodic inventories were to be 
    derived. As per CAA section 187(a)(5), the submittal of the first 
    periodic emissions inventory, as a revision to the SIP, was required no 
    later than September 30, 1995, and every three years thereafter until 
    the area is redesignated to attainment. This requirement applies to 
    Colorado Springs, Denver, Fort Collins, and Longmont. Further 
    information on these inventories and their purpose can be found in the 
    document ``Emission Inventory Requirements for Carbon Monoxide State 
    Implementation Plans'', USEPA, Office of Air Quality Planning and 
    Standards, EPA-450/4-91-011, March, 1991, and the September 30, 1994, 
    guidance memorandum entitled ``1993 Periodic Emission Inventory 
    Guidance'', signed by J. David Mobley, Chief of the Emission Inventory 
    Branch (hereafter, the Mobley Memorandum).
        The periodic inventories were to be prepared in similar detail as 
    was done with the 1990 base year inventories and were to address actual 
    CO emissions for the area during the peak CO season. The peak CO season 
    should reflect the months when peak CO air quality concentrations 
    occur. As winter is the peak CO season for Colorado Springs, Denver, 
    Fort Collins, and Longmont, the 1993 periodic inventories included the 
    period November through January. The periodic inventories are to 
    address emissions from stationary point, area, on-road mobile, and non-
    road mobile sources.
    
    II. Summary of SIP Revision
    
    A. Review of the 1993 CO Periodic Emissions Inventories (PEI) for 
    Colorado Springs, Denver, Fort Collins, and Longmont
    
        The September 30, 1994, Mobley memorandum allowed for two options 
    for the approach to developing the 1993 PEI. If the 1993 PEI was to be 
    used for a regulatory purpose (i.e., milestone compliance 
    demonstration, rate of progress, maintenance plan tracking, etc.) a 
    rigorous, comprehensive PEI was to be developed similar in detail and 
    documentation to that which was done for the 1990 base year inventory. 
    If, however, EPA and the State determined that the 1993 PEI would not 
    be used to support a regulatory purpose other than to fulfill the CAA 
    section 187(a)(5) requirement, a less rigorous approach could be 
    appropriate. Colorado chose the latter option for all four 1993 PEIs.
        EPA has reviewed the 1993 PEIs for Colorado Springs, Denver, Fort 
    Collins, and Longmont. Summary tables, calculations for all identified 
    sources in each source category, and adequate documentation were 
    provided by the State for each of the four PEIs. EPA has determined 
    that the Colorado Springs, Denver, Fort Collins, and Longmont 1993 PEIs 
    satisfy the requirements of section 187(a)(5) of the CAA.
        The 1993 CO emissions from point sources, area sources, on-road 
    mobile sources, and non-road mobile sources for Colorado Springs, 
    Denver, Fort Collins, and Longmont are summarized in the following 
    table:
    
                                   Carbon Monoxide Seasonal Emissions in Tons Per Day                               
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                        Point                    On-road      Non-road              
                  Non-attainment area                   source    Area source     mobile       mobile       Total   
                                                      emissions*   emissions    emissions    emissions    emissions 
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Colorado Springs...............................         2.83        29.49       250.80        34.70       317.82
    
    [[Page 38088]]
    
                                                                                                                    
    Denver.........................................        13.37        72.40      1441.97       152.96      1680.70
    Fort Collins...................................         0.18         7.54        49.99         8.96        66.67
    Longmont.......................................         0.03         2.36        20.78         5.54        28.71
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    *Major CO point sources (i.e., CO emissions equal to or greater than 100 tons per year).                        
    
        All supporting calculations and documentation for these 1993 carbon 
    monoxide periodic inventories are contained in the State's Technical 
    Support Document (TSD) for this action.
    
    B. Procedural Background
    
        The CAA requires States to observe certain procedural requirements 
    in developing SIP revisions for submittal to EPA. Section 110(a)(2) of 
    the CAA provides that each SIP revision (including emission 
    inventories) be adopted after going through a reasonable notice and 
    public hearing process prior to being submitted by a State to 
    EPA.1 The State held a public hearing for the Colorado 
    Springs, Denver, Fort Collins, and Longmont 1993 PEIs on December 21, 
    1995, directly after which the inventories were adopted by the Air 
    Quality Control Commission (AQCC); the inventories were formally 
    submitted by the Governor on September 16, 1997. EPA determined the 
    submittal was complete on February 23, 1998.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \1\ Memorandum from John Calcagni, Director, Air Quality 
    Management Division, and William G. Laxton, Director, Technical 
    Support Division, to Regional Air Division Directors, Region I-X, 
    ``Public Hearing Requirements for 1990 Base-Year Emission 
    Inventories for Ozone and Carbon Monoxide Nonattainment Areas,'' 
    September 29, 1992.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    III. Final Action
    
        EPA is approving the carbon monoxide 1993 periodic emission 
    inventories for Colorado Springs, Denver, Fort Collins, and Longmont as 
    fulfilling the requirements of section 187(a)(5) of the CAA. These 
    inventories were submitted by the Governor with a letter dated 
    September 16, 1997.
        Nothing in this action should be construed as permitting or 
    allowing or establishing a precedent for any future request for 
    revision to any state implementation plan. Each request for revision to 
    the state implementation plan shall be considered separately in light 
    of specific technical, economic, and environmental factors and in 
    relation to relevant statutory and regulatory requirements.
        EPA is publishing this rule without prior proposal because the 
    Agency views this as a noncontroversial amendment and anticipates no 
    adverse comments. However, in the proposed rules section of this 
    Federal Register publication, EPA is publishing a separate document 
    that will serve as the proposal to approve the SIP revision should 
    adverse comments be filed. This rule will be effective September 14, 
    1998 without further notice unless the Agency receives adverse comments 
    by August 14, 1998.
        If the EPA receives such comments, then EPA will publish a notice 
    withdrawing the final rule and informing the public that the rule will 
    not take effect. All public comments received will then be addressed in 
    a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. The EPA will not 
    institute a second comment period on the proposed rule. Any parties 
    interested in commenting on the proposed rule should do so at this 
    time. If no such comments are received, the public is advised that this 
    rule will be effective on September 14, 1998 and no further action will 
    be taken on the proposed rule.
    
    IV. Administrative Requirements
    
    A. Executive Orders 12866 and 13045
    
        The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted this 
    regulatory action from Executive Order 12866, entitled ``Regulatory 
    Planning and Review,'' review.
        The final rule is not subject to Executive Order 13045, entitled 
    ``Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety 
    Risks,'' because it is not an ``economically significant'' action under 
    Executive Order 12866.
    
    B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
    
        The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) generally requires an agency 
    to conduct a regulatory flexibility analysis of any rule subject to 
    notice and comment rulemaking requirements unless the agency certifies 
    that the rule will not have a significant economic impact on a 
    substantial number of small entities. Small entities include small 
    businesses, small not-for-profit enterprises, and small governmental 
    jurisdictions. This final rule will not have a significant impact on a 
    substantial number of small entities because SIP approvals under 
    section 110 and subchapter I, part D of the Clean Air Act do not create 
    any new requirements but simply approve requirements that the State is 
    already imposing. Therefore, because the Federal SIP approval does not 
    create any new requirements, I certify that this action will not have a 
    significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. 
    Moreover, due to the nature of the Federal-State relationship under the 
    Clean Air Act, preparation of a flexibility analysis would constitute 
    Federal inquiry into the economic reasonableness of state action. The 
    Clean Air Act forbids EPA to base its actions concerning SIPs on such 
    grounds. Union Electric Co. v. U.S. EPA, 427 U.S. 246, 255-66 (1976); 
    42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2).
    
    C. Unfunded Mandates
    
        Under Section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 
    (``Unfunded Mandates Act''), signed into law on March 22, 1995, EPA 
    must prepare a budgetary impact statement to accompany any proposed or 
    final rule that includes a Federal mandate that may result in estimated 
    costs to State, local, or tribal governments in the aggregate; or to 
    the private sector, of $100 million or more. Under Section 205, EPA 
    must select the most cost-effective and least burdensome alternative 
    that achieves the objectives of the rule and is consistent with 
    statutory requirements. Section 203 requires EPA to establish a plan 
    for informing and advising any small governments that may be 
    significantly or uniquely impacted by the rule.
        EPA has determined that the approval action promulgated does not 
    include a Federal mandate that may result in estimated costs of $100 
    million or more to either State, local, or tribal governments in the 
    aggregate, or to the private sector. This Federal action approves pre-
    existing requirements under State or local law, and imposes no new 
    requirements.
        Accordingly, no additional costs to State, local, or tribal 
    governments, or to
    
    [[Page 38089]]
    
    the private sector, result from this action.
    
    D. Submission to Congress and the Comptroller General
    
        The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the 
    Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally 
    provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating 
    the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, 
    to each House of Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United 
    States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other 
    required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of 
    Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior 
    to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. This rule is not a 
    ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
    
    E. Petitions for Judicial Review
    
        Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for 
    judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court 
    of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by September 14, 1998. Filing a 
    petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule 
    does not affect the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial 
    review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial 
    review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such 
    rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings 
    to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
    
    F. Approving SIP Revisions in Audit Law States
    
        Nothing in this action should be construed as making any 
    determination or expressing any position regarding Colorado's audit 
    privilege and penalty immunity law (13-25-126.5, C.R.S.) or its impact 
    upon any approved provision in the SIP, including the revision at issue 
    here. The action taken herein does not express or imply any viewpoint 
    on the question of whether there are legal deficiencies in this or any 
    other Clean Air Act program resulting from the effect of Colorado's 
    audit privilege and immunity law. A state audit privilege and immunity 
    law can affect only state enforcement and cannot have any impact on 
    federal enforcement authorities. EPA may at any time invoke its 
    authority under the Clean Air Act, including, for example, sections 
    113, 167, 205, 211 or 213, to enforce the requirements or prohibitions 
    of the state plan, independently of any state enforcement effort. In 
    addition, citizen enforcement under section 304 of the Clean Air Act is 
    likewise unaffected by a state audit privilege or immunity law.
    
    List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
    
        Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide, 
    Intergovernmental relations, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
    
        Dated: July 6, 1998.
    Patricia D. Hull,
    Acting Regional Administrator,
    Region VIII.
    
        40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
    
    PART 52--[AMENDED]
    
        1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
    
    Subpart G--Colorado
    
        2. Section 52.348 is amended by designating the existing text as 
    paragraph (a) and by adding paragraph (b) to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 52.348  Emission inventories.
    
    * * * * *
        (b) On September 16, 1997, the Governor of Colorado submitted the 
    1993 Carbon Monoxide Periodic Emission Inventories for Colorado 
    Springs, Denver, Fort Collins, and Longmont as revisions to the 
    Colorado State Implementation Plan. These inventories address carbon 
    monoxide emissions from stationary point, area, non-road mobile, and 
    on-road mobile sources.
    
    [FR Doc. 98-18862 Filed 7-14-98; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
9/14/1998
Published:
07/15/1998
Department:
Environmental Protection Agency
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Direct final rule.
Document Number:
98-18862
Dates:
This direct final rule is effective on September 14, 1998 without further notice, unless EPA receives adverse comments by August 14, 1998. If adverse comments are received, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of the direct final rule in the Federal Register and inform the public that the rule will not take effect.
Pages:
38087-38089 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
CO-001-0024a, FRL-6124-4
PDF File:
98-18862.pdf
CFR: (1)
40 CFR 52.348