[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 137 (Tuesday, July 16, 1996)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 37144-37181]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-17824]
[[Page 37143]]
_______________________________________________________________________
Part IV
Department of Transportation
_______________________________________________________________________
Federal Aviation Administration
_______________________________________________________________________
14 CFR Parts 121, 125, 129, and 135
Revisions to Digital Flight Data Recorder Rules; Proposed Rule
Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 137 / Tuesday, July 16, 1996 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 37144]]
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Parts 121, 125, 129, and 135
[Docket No. 28109; Notice No. 96-7]
RIN 2120-AF-76
Revisions to Digital Flight Data Recorder Rules
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document proposes to revise and update the Federal
Aviation Regulations to require certain operators to record additional
digital flight data recorder (DFDR) parameters. These revisions follow
a series of safety recommendations issued by the National
Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) and the Federal Aviation
Administration's (FAA) decision that the DFDR rules should be revised
to upgrade recorder capabilities in most transport airplanes. These
revisions would allow additional information to be collected to ensure
more thorough accident or incident investigation and to enable industry
to predict certain trends and make necessary modifications before an
accident or incident occurs.
DATES: Comments on the proposed revisions to parts 121, 125, and 135
must be received by August 15, 1996. Comments on the proposed revisions
to part 129 must be received by November 13, 1996.
ADDRESSES: Comments on this notice should be mailed, in triplicate to:
Federal Aviation Administration, Office of Chief Counsel, Attention:
Rules Docket (AGC-200), Docket No. 28109, 800 Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20591. Comments delivered must be marked Docket No.
28109. Comments may also be submitted electronically to the following
Internet address: nprmcmts@mail.hq.faa.gov. Comments may be examined in
Room 915G weekdays, except on Federal holidays, between 8:30 a.m. and 5
p.m.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Frank Rock, Aircraft Engineering Division, Aircraft Certification
Service, Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20591, telephone (202) 267-9567.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
Interested persons are invited to participate in the making of the
proposed rule by submitting such written data, views, or arguments as
they may desire. Comments relating to the environmental energy,
federalism, or economic impact that might result from adopting the
proposal in this notice are also invited. Substantive comments should
be accompanied by cost estimates. Comments should identify the
regulatory docket or notice number and should be submitted in
triplicate to the Rules Docket address specified above. All comments
received on or before the closing date for comments specified will be
considered by the Administrator before taking action on this proposed
rulemaking. The proposal contained in this notice may be changed in
light of comments received. All comments received will be available,
both before and after the closing date for comments, in the Rules
Docket for examination by interested persons. A report summarizing each
substantive public contact with FAA personnel concerned with this
rulemaking will be filed in the docket. Commenters wishing the FAA to
acknowledge receipt of their comments submitted in response to this
notice must include a pre-addressed, stamped postcard on which the
following statement is made: ``Comments to Docket No. 28109.'' The
postcard will be date stamped and mailed to the commenter.
Availability of NPRM's
An electronic copy of this document may be downloaded using a modem
and suitable communications software from the FAA regulations section
of the Fedworld electronic bulletin board service (telephone: 703-321-
3339), the Federal Register's electronic bulletin board service
(telephone: 202-512-1661), or the FAA's Aviation Rulemaking Advisory
Committee Bulletin Board service (telephone: 202-267-5948).
Internet users may reach the FAA's web page at http://www.faa.gov
or the Federal Register's webpage at http://www.access.gpo.gov/su__docs
for access to recently published rulemaking documents.
Any person may obtain a copy of this NPRM by submitting a request
to the Federal Aviation Administration, Office of Rulemaking, ARM-1,
800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591, or by calling (202)
267-9680. Communications must identify the notice number or docket
number of this NPRM.
Persons interested in being placed on the mailing list for future
NPRM's should request from the above office a copy of Advisory Circular
No. 11-2A, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Distribution System, that
describes the application procedure.
Background
Statement of the Problem
The NTSB has submitted recommendations to the FAA to require the
recordation of additional parameters on certain flight data recorders.
These recommendations were submitted in response to accidents involving
two Boeing 737 aircraft that were operated by two different air
carriers. Both airplanes were equipped with flight data recorders
(FDR's), but in neither case did the FDR provide sufficient information
about airplane motion and flight control surface positions during the
accident sequence to enable the NTSB to determine a probable cause in
either accident.
The history of aircraft accidents and the lack of information that
has inhibited proper investigation of their causes is much broader than
recent experience with the Boeing 737. Historical records of airplane
incidents suggest that additional, reliable data for the entire fleet
of transport category airplanes is necessary to identify causes of
these incidents before accidents occur. This proposed rule seeks to
expand the data collection requirements to include all parameters that
can cost-effectively be collected.
History of FDR Regulations
Since the original development of foil flight recorders, both the
FAA and the NTSB have relied heavily on the data retrieved from them to
aid in accident and incident investigation. The limited capability of
the 6-parameter foil recorder made it virtually impossible to fully
identify the probable cause of certain accidents, such as those related
to windshear. Until the advent of more sophisticated flight data
recorders, many accidents were assumed to be caused by pilot error
since no other viable alternative could be identified. The high failure
rate of those recorders and their limited recording capabilities led
Congress to require the use of improved recorders.
On March 25, 1987, the FAA promulgated a final rule that required
operators, by May 26, 1995, to install improved (11-parameter digital)
flight data recorders [DFDR's] on all airplanes type certificated on or
before September 30, 1969, and operated under part 121 of the Federal
Aviation Regulations (52 FR 9622). The final rule, adopted as 14 CFR
121.343(c), was issued in response to a recommendation from the NTSB
that was based on accident/incident files for January 1983 to February
1986
[[Page 37145]]
that revealed a high failure rate for metal foil flight recorders. The
data revealed that 37 recorders (48 percent) had one or more
malfunctioning parameters preceding the accident or incident,
preventing the recording or readout of pertinent data.
On July 11, 1988, the FAA promulgated a final rule that required
the recording of additional parameters for certain newer airplanes.
Airplanes manufactured after May 26, 1989, and certain other airplanes
were required to have a DFDR that would record 17 or more parameters.
In August 1991, the Air Transport Association (ATA) petitioned the
FAA for an exemption from Sec. 121.343(c). The ATA stated that the 1994
compliance date for the DFDR retrofit was inappropriate when
considering the schedule for either retrofitting airplanes with nose
abatement equipment or retiring airplanes in order to comply with the
Stage 3 transition mandated in September 1991 (56 FR 48628, September
25, 1991). The FAA denied the ATA exemption request, stating that the
Stage 3 transition rule did not mandate the retirement of any Stage 2
airplanes. The FAA pointed out that noise abatement equipment was
expected to be available for virtually the entire active fleet.
In June 1992, the ATA again requested that the FAA extend the May
26, 1994, DFDR compliance date for its members and similarly situated
operators. In the alternative, the ATA requested that the FAA establish
a delayed DFDR retrofit schedule that coincided with the Stage 3
transition interim compliance dates to avoid having to install new
DFDR's on airplanes that were scheduled to be retired. The ATA asserted
that the compliance deadline would require its members to install
DFDR's on Stage 2 airplanes that would be retired within 5\1/2\ years
of the May 1994 compliance date to remain in compliance with the part
91 noise operating rule. The ATA asserted that this DFDR retrofit
requirement for State 2 airplanes would impose substantial costs on
them with little perceived benefit.
On January 29, 1993, the FAA granted an exemption to ATA members to
operate certain Stage 2 airplanes equipped with DFDR's that have 6
rather than 11 operational parameters until the aircraft are retired,
but no later than December 31, 1998.
On November 17, 1993, the ATA submitted a petition for rulemaking
to amend Sec. 121.343. The ATA stated that the exemption granted did
not provide the scope of relief necessary for its members and similarly
situated air carriers, and that a change to the rule was necessary. As
justification for this proposed change, the ATA stated in its petition
that there would be significant compliance costs and that there were
problems with the technical requirements of DFDR installation.
In January 1994, to further support its petition, the ATA presented
updated information indicating that conditions in the industry had
changed further, and that meeting the May 26, 1994, compliance date
would be impossible for a significant number of Stage 2 airplanes
because of changes in fleet plans, and equipment availability and
certification difficulties.
Although the FAA was unable to support the ATA position, the agency
stated that some relief was needed from the combined impact of the
Stage 3 transition and DFDR retrofit rules and the then-current
equipment availability problems, at least as far as Stage 2 airplanes
were concerned. Accordingly, in May 1994, the FAA amended
Sec. 121.343(c) to provide to part 121 operators up to one year of
relief for the retrofit of Stage 2 airplanes that were subject to the
noise transition requirements of 14 CFR part 91. The extension of the
compliance date for 11-parameter DFDR's on Stage 2 airplanes to May
1995 was intended to allow operators to retire some of the affected
airplanes as of the December 31, 1994, noise compliance deadline, and
to acquire the necessary equipment for the remaining Stage 2 airplanes.
No problems with meeting the 1995 compliance date were reported.
NTSB Recommendations
On February 22, 1995, the NTSB submitted recommendations A-95-25,
A-95-26, and A-95-27, which recommended that the FAA require upgrades
of the flight data recorders installed on certain airplanes to record
certain additional parameters not required by the current regulations.
As justification for these recommendations, the NTSB submitted
background information. The full recommendation has been placed in the
docket for this rulemaking and is summarized below.
On September 8, 1994, a USAir Boeing 737-300, flight 427, was on a
scheduled passenger flight from Chicago, Illinois, to Pittsburgh,
Pennsylvania. During the approach to Pittsburgh, the airplane suddenly
rolled to the left and pitched down until it reached a nearly vertical
attitude and struck the ground near Aliquippa, Pennsylvania. The
airplane was destroyed; none of the 5 crewmembers or 127 passengers
survived. The NTSB's investigation of this accident is continuing, and
no probable cause has yet been determined.
On March 3, 1991, a United Airlines Boeing 737-291, flight 585, was
on a scheduled passenger flight from Denver to Colorado Springs,
Colorado. As the airplane was completing the turn to final approach, it
rolled rapidly to the right and pitched down, reaching a nearly
vertical attitude before it struck the ground. The airplane was
destroyed; none of the five crewmembers or 20 passengers survived. In
its report, the NTSB was unable to make a determination of probable
cause of the accident.
Both airplanes were equipped with flight data recorders. In neither
case did the recorder provide information about airplane motion and
flight control surface positions during the accident sequence that the
NTSB has stated would be important in determining a probable cause of
the accident.
In the Colorado Springs accident, five flight data parameters--
altitude, airspeed, heading, vertical acceleration, and microphone
keying--were recorded by the FDR in accordance with Sec. 121.343 for
airplanes of its age. The FDR of the airplane involved in the Colorado
Springs accident was not required to record other parameters that the
NTSB has cited as critical to its accident investigation, including
airplane pitch and roll attitude, engine thrust values, lateral and
longitudinal acceleration, control wheel position, rudder pedal
position, and the position of control surfaces such as the rudder,
aileron, and spoiler.
The Aliquippa accident also involved a Boeing 737, but that
airplane's FDR system had been retrofitted with six additional
parameters in anticipation of the 1995 deadline for these enhancements.
However, the additional parameters did not include information on the
positions of cockpit controls, flight control surface position, lateral
acceleration, or autopilot status parameters that the NTSB has stated
hampered its continuing accident investigation. In a public hearing on
the accident, conducted by the NTSB in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, on
January 23-27, 1995, witnesses from the FAA, aircraft manufacturers,
and airlines agreed that additional FDR parameters would have assisted
the NTSB in determining the probable cause of this accident.
Had the airplanes involved in the Colorado Springs and Aliquippa
accidents been equipped with enhanced FDR's, the NTSB stated that the
information from the additional parameters would have allowed it to
quickly identify any abnormal control
[[Page 37146]]
surface movements, configuration changes, or autopilot status changes
that may have been involved in the loss of airplane control. This
information from the additional parameters might also have allowed the
NTSB to rule out certain factors, if warranted, and to focus its
investigations on other areas.
The NTSB has stated that the additional data parameters recorded on
some FDR's substantially aided its investigation of two regional
airline accidents that occurred during 1994. The first accident
occurred on October 31, 1994, while an American Eagle ATR-72-210,
flight 4184, was on a scheduled flight from Indianapolis, Indiana, to
Chicago, Illinois. The flight had been placed in a holding pattern over
Roselawn, Indiana, because of weather delays at O'Hare Airport. The
flight was cleared to remain in the holding pattern and to descend from
10,000 to 8,000 feet. The airplane rolled to the right, entered a steep
descent, and struck the ground. None of the 64 passengers or 4
crewmembers survived. The NTSB's continuing investigation has not yet
determined the probable cause of the accident; however, information
from the enhanced FDR enabled the NTSB to identify, within hours after
receiving the recorder in its laboratories, the key events leading to
the airplane's departure from controlled flight and the events during
its final descent.
The ATR-72 was equipped with an FDR that recorded 98 parameters,
including vane angle of attack (VAOA), aileron bellcrank position, flap
position, aileron trim position, and autopilot engagement status. The
FDR data showed that, as the airplane was descending through 9,400
feet, the wing flaps began to retract and the airplane's VAOA
increased. As the VAOA reached 5 degrees, the autopilot disengaged, and
within \1/4\ second the ailerons deflected to near maximum travel in
the right-wing-down direction. The FDR data also showed that the
rolling moment was reversed when the VAOA was reduced to below 5
degrees and the ailerons deflected in the left-wing-down direction. The
right rolling moment recurred as the VAOA again increased to 5 degrees
and the ailerons deflected in the right-wing-down direction. Control of
the airplane was not restored in time to prevent impact with the
ground.
The data available from the ATR-72 FDR indicated to investigators
that the airplane rolled as expected in response to aileron control
surface movements, and that the aileron movements were correlated with
increases in the airplane's angle of attack. As a result, the NTSB was
able to focus its efforts on possible explanations for the aileron
control surface movements and, within days of the accident, the NTSB
issued safety recommendations to minimize the likelihood of similar
occurrences in the future. As part of its continuing investigation, the
NTSB is also examining readouts from FDR's with expanded parameters
from seven other ATR airplanes that have reportedly encountered flight
control anomalies, three of which have shown similarities to those
recorded before the accident.
In the second accident, on February 1, 1994, an American Eagle Saab
340B, flight 3641, was approaching Baton Rouge, Louisiana, on a
scheduled passenger flight from Dallas/Fort Worth, Texas. As the
airplane descended through 9,000 feet, both engines failed. The
flightcrew executed a forced landing at False River Air Park in New
Roads, Louisiana, during which the airplane sustained substantial
damage. A flight attendant received minor injuries during the emergency
evacuation. The 2 pilots and 23 passengers aboard were not injured.
The FDR installed on the Saab 340B recorded 128 parameters. Data
from the FDR showed that as the airplane descended through 9,040 feet,
there was a rapid rise of both propellers' rotational speed to well
above the maximum allowable revolutions per minute. Because the FDR was
equipped to capture the positions of the engine power levers as well as
the engine RPM's, the NTSB was able to determine that at the same time
the propeller speed increased, the power levers moved from the flight
idle gate position to aft of the ground idle detents. The airplane's
approved flight manual prohibits such power lever movements while in
flight. This flightcrew action explained the propeller overspeed, which
resulted in dual engine failure. With the expanded FDR data, the NTSB
was able to rule out alternative explanations for the propeller
overspeed, including propeller system failures that previously had
affected similar propellers installed in another turboprop regional
airliner.
The importance of FDR data is not limited to investigations of
catastrophic accidents. Flight recorder data from incidents, which are
less serious but more common, can provide information to help prevent
accidents involving similar circumstances. Following the Colorado
Springs and Aliquippa accidents, the NTSB investigated 28 Boeing 737
incidents (U.S. operators) involving anomalous rudder activity or
uncommanded roll oscillations. The FDR's aboard these incident
airplanes, however, were not equipped to record flight control surface
positions, flight control inputs, or lateral acceleration. Like 79
percent of all U.S.-registered Boeing 737's, the airplanes involved in
the incidents were manufactured prior to May 26, 1989; consequently,
they were required to record only the five basic FDR parameters. As a
result, certain objective data were not available from the FDR's, and
investigators had little more than the flightcrews' subjective
recollections of these incidents to aid in determining cause.
In contrast to the investigations of 28 Boeing 737 incidents, for
which important FDR data were not available, investigations of other
incidents have been greatly aided by the availability of enhanced
recorded information. These incidents involved airplanes equipped with
a digital data bus that transmits information from many sensors to the
onboard recording devices.
In 1993, a British Airways Boeing 747-436 experienced a nose-down
pitching moment immediately after departure from London Heathrow
Airport. The captain avoided ground contact by exerting substantial
back pressure on his control column. The incident was investigated by
the United Kingdom's Air Accidents Investigation Branch (AAIB). Use of
information recorded by a Quick Access Recorder (QAR) was useful in the
AAIB's investigation, and led to a recommendation that the FAA require
modifications of Boeing 747 hydraulic systems and elevator power
control units.
Between June and August 1993, an Air France Boeing 737-300 airplane
experienced three rudder deflection anomalies. For each incident,
approximately 206 flight data parameters were available to the French
accident investigation authority. The data were recorded on QAR's, and
available parameters included control surface positions, flight path
data, acceleration in three axes, yaw damper, and autopilot modes. The
NTSB is evaluating the data from these incidents for possible
applicability to the Aliquippa and Colorado Springs accidents.
The data parameters currently required to be recorded on FDR's are
based on the NTSB's accident investigation experience and the capacity
of the recording devices. Historically, many accidents investigated by
the NTSB focused on wind shear, takeoff overruns, and instances of
controlled flight into terrain; fewer accidents may have involved the
inflight loss of lateral or directional control. In response, FDR
[[Page 37147]]
parameter requirements focused on airplane performance (such as
airspeed, altitude, and longitudinal acceleration) rather than on
flight controls (such as rudder position and trim settings). However,
recent accidents and incidents have persuaded the NTSB that more
information about flight controls should be recorded by FDR's.
Among the additional flight control parameters cited as important
by the NTSB are those that pertain to the positions of flight control
inputs and control surface positions. Under current rules. Airplanes
fitted with conventional flight controls are permitted to record either
the cockpit control input (such as control wheel position) or the
control surface position (such as the direction and amount of aileron
deflection), if one can be derived from the other. However, in its
investigations of the recent Boeing 737 accidents, the NTSB found that
in some failure modes, flight control surfaces could move independently
of cockpit flight control inputs. Also, under some conditions,
additional information is needed by investigators to determine whether
the controls on the flight deck caused the control surfaces to move, or
vice versa. Consequently, the NTSB strongly recommends that FDR's
should record both the control inputs and control surface positions.
Flight control trim information, including the positions of trim
controls for roll and yaw, also has been found to be essential during
recent accident investigations. For example, the aileron and rudder
trim parameters provided answers to critical questions early in the
investigation of the Roselawn accident. The airplane involved had
previously experienced trim anomalies; the FDR revealed none on the
accident flight.
Recent technological changes have made feasible the acquisition and
storage of large amounts of data on FDR's. Today, even for older
airplanes, many FDR systems are capable of recording additional
parameters because of unused capacity in the flight recording system.
In terms of flight recording systems, there are two general categories
of airplanes in the current air carrier fleet: those that operate
predominately with analog systems, and those that operate predominately
with digital systems.
On an airplane that operates with an analog system, information
from remotely located data sensors (for example, a rudder position
sensor located in the tail section) is transmitted in an analog format
to the FDR via dedicated wires. The information is then converted to
digital format in the FDR or the flight data acquisition unit (FDAU).
On an airplane equipped with a digital data bus, information is
transmitted in digital format from a multitude of sensors, along a
single, high-capacity communications pathway (data bus). Information
transmitted on the bus is provided to a number of systems, including
flight management computers. cockpit displays, QAR's, and FDR's.
Additional data can be fed from the bus to the FDR, based on
information that is already on the bus for other purposes or added to
the bus by new sensors.
During the public hearing on the Aliquippa accident, a major U.S.
air carrier expressed concern about the costs of upgrading FDR's on the
carrier's fleet. The NTSB recognized that enhanced FDR capability needs
to be weighed against the costs. However, the Board also believes that
the costs should be balanced against the remaining useful life and
revenue-earning potential of an airplane.
The NTSB believes that transport category airplanes of a type that
is still in production and operated under 14 CFR Parts 121, 125, or 135
should be retroffitted with the sensors and FDAU needed to record the
parameters listed in its recommendation. Further, certain airplanes
that are out of production but continue to be heavily used in U.S.
airline fleets should also be retrofitted to record the parameters
listed in its recommendation.
The NTSB recommended that the FAA complete its rulemaking on FDR
enhancements by December 31, 1995, and that upgrades be completed by
January 1, 1998. Further, since Boeing 737 airplanes account for about
23 percent of the U.S. air carrier fleet, the NTSB recommends that FDR
enhancement be accomplished sooner for these airplanes. The NTSB
recommended that the FAA require all Boeing 737 airplanes operated
under 14 CFR Parts 121 and 125 be equipped by December 31, 1995, with
FDR's that record the parameters required by current regulations plus
lateral acceleration, flight control inputs for pitch, roll, and yaw,
and primary flight control surface positions for pitch, roll, and yaw.
The following recommendations were submitted by the NTSB to the
Federal Aviation Administration:
I. Require that each Boeing 737 airplane operated under 14 CFR Part
121 or 125 be equipped, by December 31, 1995, with a flight data
recorder system that records, as a minimum, the parameters required by
current regulations applicable plus the following parameters: lateral
acceleration, flight control inputs for pitch, roll, and yaw, and
primary flight control surface positions for pitch, roll, and yaw.
(Classified as Class I, Urgent Action) (Recommendation No. A-95-25)
II. Amend, by December 31, 1995, 14 CFR Secs. 121.343, 125.225, and
135.152 to require that Boeing 727 airplanes, Lockheed L-1011
airplanes, and all transport category airplanes operated under 14 CFR
Parts 121, 125, or 135 whose type certificates apply to airplanes still
in production, be equipped to record on a flight data recorder system,
as a minimum, the parameters listed in ``Proposed Minimum FDR Parameter
Requirements for Airplanes in Service'' plus any other parameters
required by current regulations applicable to each individual airplane.
Specify that the airplanes be so equipped by January 1, 1998, or by the
later date when they meet Stage 3 noise requirements but, regardless of
Stage 3 compliance status, no later than December 31, 1999. (Classified
as Class II, Priority Action) (Recommendation No. A-95-26)
III. Amend, by December 31, 1995, 14 CFR 121.343, 125.225, and
135.152 to require that all airplanes operated under 14 CFR Parts 121,
125, or 135, having 10 or more seats, and for which an original
airworthiness certificate is received after December 31, 1996, record
the parameters listed in ``Proposed FDR Enhancements for Newly
Manufactured Airplanes'' on a flight data recorder having at least a
25-hour recording capacity. (Classified as Class II, Priority Action)
(Recommendation No. A-95-27)
FAA Response to the NTSB Recommendation
The FAA responded to the above NTSB recommendations in a letter
dated May 16, 1995, which is summarized below.
In response to Safety Recommendation A-95-25, the FAA stated that
it agrees that Boeing 737 airplanes that operate under 14 CFR Part 121
or 125 should be equipped with flight data recorders that include, as a
minimum, the parameters referenced in this safety recommendation. The
proposed rule would require all Boeing 737 airplanes as well as certain
other airplanes operated under 14 CFR Parts 121, 125, or 135 having 10
or more seats to be equipped to record the parameters that were
specified by the NTSB.
The FAA received enough valid information from the public to
determine that the schedule for retrofit completion by December 31,
1995,
[[Page 37148]]
could not be met. The proposed date would have imposed an extremely
aggressive retrofit schedule that, if it were physically possible,
would have resulted in substantial airplane groundings and very high
associated costs. Furthermore, if operators had been required to
retrofit all Boeing 737 airplanes before the end of 1995, each of these
airplanes might have had to undergo a second retrofit to meet the
expanded requirements that are being proposed in response to NTSB
Recommendations A-95-26 and -27.
In response to NTSB recommendation A-95-26, the FAA agrees that
airplanes still in production should be required to be equipped with
DFDR's that record, as a minimum, the parameters listed in the NTSB
recommendation.
In response to NTSB recommendation A-95-27, the FAA agrees that
airplanes operated under parts 121, 125, or 135 having 10 or more seats
for which an original airworthiness certificate is received after
December 31, 1996, should record the parameters listed in ``proposed
FDR Enhancements for Newly Manufactured Airplanes'' on a flight data
recorder having at least a 25 -hour recording capacity.
On March 14, 1995, the FAA published in the Federal Register a
notice of a public hearing, and solicited public comment pursuant to
the NTSB recommendations. On April 20, 1995, the public hearing was
held in Washington, DC. Eight speakers from the aviation community gave
presentations. Copies of the presentations have been placed in the
docket for this rulemaking.
After reviewing the comments submitted and listening to the
presentations, the FAA determined that it would be beneficial to have
aviation industry personnel assist in any related rulemaking efforts.
On June 27, 1995, the FAA published a notice in the Federal Register
that the Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee (ARAC) established the
Flight Data Recorder Working Group (60 FR 33247), which included
members representing the Air Transport Association, Aerospace
Industries Association of America. General Aviation Manufacturers
Association, Regional Airline Association, Air Line Pilots Association,
and the FAA. The NTSB was invited to participate in working group
efforts in an advisory capacity. The working group's task was to
recommend to ARAC rulemaking proposals or other alternatives that would
satisfactorily address the NTSB recommendations. The ARAC could then
make one or more recommendations to the FAA, and the FAA would
determine whether to issue a proposal based on the ARAC recommendation.
The ARAC DFDR working group first met in June 1995 in Washington,
DC. Work continued on a draft proposed rulemaking until November, with
members communicating by electronic mail, fax, telephone conference
calls, and in person at subsequent working group meetings.
Several elements of the proposed rule were discussed many times,
including the characteristics that would define various classes of
aircraft (e.g., date of certification, date of manufacture, current FDR
equipment installations and configurations, equipment availability),
the inclusion of certain airplane types in the applicability of a new
rule, the compliance times attached to each category of airplane
described.
Despite numerous meetings and proposals, no consensus was reached
as to the requirements that would be acceptable to the FAA, NTSB,
airplane operators and airplane manufacturers. On November 15, 1995,
the working group presented to the ARAC Executive Committee a summary
of the work undertaken by the working group. The presentation
highlighted the areas where consensus had not been reached, including
some of the actual parameters that would be included in the final list
of requirements and the differences between the proposed list and those
required under the European Joint Aviation Requirements for Operations
(JAR-Ops), whether airplanes with 10-19 passenger seats should be
covered since they were not specifically mentioned in the NTSB
recommendation, whether expected but not currently existing technology
could be mandated in future requirements for new airplanes, and several
issues concerning the cost figures used in the draft regulatory
evaluation. The ARAC Executive Committee decided that each committee
member would review the two versions of the proposed rulemaking
document that were presented and make individual comments to be
submitted to the FAA by December 1.
Comments from several ARAC Executive Committee members were
forwarded to the FAA on December 4. The ARAC Executive Committee made
no formal recommendation to the FAA concerning the proposed rule
documents reviewed and discussed at the November 15 meeting. Of the
comments received on December 4, the general comments are addressed
here; specific comments as to the inclusion or exclusion of certain
provisions from the proposed rule are included in the explanation of
the proposed rule provisions below.
General Comments From the ARAC Executive Committee Members
Several members stated that the decision to propose to require up
to 88 parameters for airplanes manufactured five years after the final
rule is effective will create a disharmony with the European JAR-Ops
and will create a disparity in the configuration of U.S. and European
airplanes, limiting their exchange.
The FAA acknowledges that the proposed requirement to record 88
paramenters exceeds the 57 parameters being required by JAR-Ops, but no
disharmony is created. The first 57 parameters (and their values in
proposed Appendix M to part 121) were arranged so as to be the same as
those rquired by JAR-Ops, at the suggestion and request of the working
group members, including two U.S. manufacturers, they are considered
harmonized. The fact that the U.S. requirement would exceed the
European requirement is not disharmony, since there is no further JAR
requirement with which the proposed rule could disagree. The 88
paramenters came from the NTSB recommendation already discussed, which
served as a basis for implementing a rule change. The FAA never
represented that the proposed rule would be limited to JAR-Ops, since
the agency understood that this would not satisfy the NTSB
recommendation. In fact, the original NSTB recommendation included more
than 88 parameters. The number was reduced slightly through certain
parameter combinations and their rearrangement to coincide with JAR-
Ops.
The NTSB has also indicated to the FAA that at least some of the
European manufacturers are already equipping their airplanes to record
88 or more parameters and that it does not anticipate a problem with
the proposed requirement. Further, the NTSB is proposing through ICAO
that the 88 parameters become the international standard; it is using
the list and Appendix values developed for this proposed rule as its
proposal to ICAO.
Some members commented that it is difficult to visualize the
proposed DFDR upgrade scheme by reading the rule language alone, and
proposed that a flow chart be included to assist with a rule overview.
The FAA agrees and is including a chart in the form of a matrix, but
cautions that the chart is a summary and should not be regarded as a
substitute for the actual rule language. The chart can be found in this
[[Page 37149]]
document, immediately following the general discussion of the proposed
rule.
At least one member recommends that a phased compliance schedule be
adopted for upgraded DFDR installation, rather than the proposed 4-year
compliance time to provide more flexibility to operators.
The FAA does not understand why a mandatory schedule of compliance
(with a suggested 35% of an operator's fleet requiring the upgrade
within 2 years) is considered more flexible than a simple final
compliance date in four years--an operator may comply as early as it
likes within the proposed 4 years. The FAA's experience with compliance
schedules has not always been positive, and several other operator
compliance schedules already exist for other requirements. Adding yet
another schedule for DFDR equipment modifications could lead to several
schedule conflicts and result in numerous requests for exemptions and
extensions compromising the intent of each rule involved. Accordingly,
the FAA does not consider an additional compliance schedule to be
advisable.
Another comment suggesting that a 6-year compliance schedule be
considered rather than 4 years is not addressed in this document
because it was never proposed at the working group level, nor has any
data been submitted as to the comparative costs of compliance. The FAA
notes that longer compliance schedules almost always result in reduced
costs. However, the proposed rule already exceeds the NTSB time
recommendation for implementation of the upgrades, and the safety
considerations of upgraded DFDR equipment are too serious to consider
lengthening the proposed 4-year compliance time. The proposed
compliance is the product of significant working group discussion and
elimination of a 2-year alternative that was predicted to be nearly
impossible because of equipment approval, availability and airplane
down time. Without similar cost data from the commenter, a 6-year
compliance time cannot be evaluated properly.
The comments concerning the proposed compliance time imply some
disagreement with the provision that upgrades must be installed
beginning at the next heavy maintenance check that occurs two years
after the effective date of the final rule (but in any case within four
years). That provision was added to prevent operators from waiting
until the last minute to install upgrades, causing a logjam in
scheduling and equipment availability; a similar provision was shown to
have worked well when the last amendment to the DFDR rules was done in
1994. Further, at the working group meetings, this provision was not
only acknowledged as necessary, the language was discussed and changed
several times at the request of the member operators. Accordingly, the
language that defines a heavy maintenance check as any time an airplane
is scheduled to be out of service for 4 or more days and is scheduled
to include access to major structural components is included in the
proposed rule as a result of working group discussions and general
agreement. No proposed phased compliance schedule or problem with the
included provision was raised at the working group meetings.
Similarly, operators of small airplanes comment that the same heavy
maintenance check provision is inappropriate for their operations. The
FAA has changed the proposed rule to include the words ``or
equivalent'' in the provision that relates to smaller airplanes, and
specifically requests that if operators of these airplanes have a more
appropriate way of describing their maintenance practices so as to
achieve a similar result, they should submit that language as a comment
to the proposed rule. This issue was not raised at the working group
level during drafting of the proposed rule.
Several commenters stated that they felt that the proposed
requirement to record lateral acceleration is unnecessary if both
rudder pedal and rudder position are also recorded. The NTSB disagrees
that lateral acceleration is redundant since it may show the effect of
outside forces on an airplane that are separate from the effect of
rudder movement. The NTSB cautions that the concern over lateral
acceleration and rudder pedal and position is not limited to the
accidents and incidents reported on the Boeing 737; the proposed
requirement to record those parameters takes into account all airplane
types and the critical nature of the information that such recordation
may uncover. The NTSB also notes that the upgrade from dual to triaxial
accelerometers may not necessarily be costly, as one commenter states,
since at least one manufacturer has a ``trade-in'' program for that
equipment. Manufacturers of this equipment are urged to supply the FAA
with further data concerning the cost and availability of this
equipment.
Commenters also expressed some confusion over the effect of the
proposed rule on airplanes currently covered by exemption No. 5593,
Stage 2 airplanes that are scheduled to be retired and are allowed to
operate with 6-parameter recorders through 1998. The terms of the
exemption were clear when granted--it was only to be used for airplanes
that were scheduled to be retired by the end of 1998; it was not an
exemption that could be used to delay the upgrade to an 11-parameter
recorder that was due in 1995. Accordingly, since any airplane covered
by the exemption should be retired before the proposed compliance date,
this proposed rule should have no effect on the exempted airplanes.
As the FAA has stated previously, any airplane covered by the
exemption that is not retired but is instead retrofitted to meet the
Stage 3 noise requirements must also upgrade to an 11-parameter
recorder before it is allowed to operate. If a decision to noise
retrofit causes an airplane to have to undergo two DFDR retrofits--to
an 11-parameter recorder to operate past 1998 and then to the
requirement of this proposed rule--it is a decision of an individual
operator, and will only result from a failure to effectively plan its
fleet composition or by an abuse of the previous DFDR upgrade
requirement and exemption No. 5593. The FAA does not intend to lengthen
the term of the exemption for any operator.
Finally, more than one commenter objected to the change that would
require the recordation of both pilot inputs and actual control surface
positions. The current requirements call for one or the other to be
recorded. Discussion of this issue consumed an appreciable amount of
time in the working group, and covered the perceived need for the data
and the cost and capability of recording both parameters (input and
output). Although consensus was not reached, the FAA is including this
provision in the proposed rule because the NTSB considers it among the
most critical of the recommended parameters. As stated previously, NTSB
investigations have shown that in some failure modes, flight control
surfaces can move independent of cockpit flight controls. Under some
conditions, additional information is necessary to determine whether
flight deck controls caused the control surfaces to move, or if the
movement of the control surface caused the cockpit controls to move.
The FAA accepts the NTSB recommendation since the current practice of
allowing one input to be recorded to demonstrate the movement of both
the control surfaces and cockpit controls has been shown to be
insufficient.
General Discussion of the Proposal
The FAA stresses that the ARAC working group provided valuable
input to the proposed rule, and that many
[[Page 37150]]
issues were brought forth and the position of the members explained,
even if consensus could not be reached on each issue. For example,
there was basic agreement among the working group members as to the
framework of the proposed rule, including the categories of airplanes
to be upgraded in various phases. As described below, consensus could
not be reached on the description of future-manufactured airplanes or
the number of parameters that they would be required to record.
Similarly, because of the considerable amount of time required to
complete the economic analysis, the efforts of the working group were
often well ahead of supporting economic data analysis, which included
data that were supplied by the working group member organizations.
As noted previously, the ARAC did not formally recommend either
version of the draft proposed rules it received from the working group.
Accordingly, the FAA is promulgating this NPRM based on the
recommendations of the NTSB and the results of the significant working
group efforts that it can support.
If adopted, this proposed rule would amend the DFDR rules, and
associated appendices, as they apply to airplanes operating under parts
121, 125, 129, and 135. The current regulations, depending on the age
of the airplanes, require as a minimum that either 11 or 17 parameters
be recorded in every airplane; in some cases, more parameters must be
recorded. Proposed requirements for part 125 closely parallel part 121
requirements, except for minor differences in the age and configuration
of affected airplanes. Part 129 does not currently have a DFDR
requirement; however, the FAA is now proposing a DFDR requirement in
part 129 for U.S.-registered airplanes. Proposed requirements for part
135 would apply only to newly manufactured airplanes that will be used
in schedules service; there are not retrofit requirements proposed for
on-demand, nonschedules airplanes.
The FAA recognizes that the program envisioned by the proposed rule
would require a substantial financial undertaking by the airline
industry. Accordingly, commenters are expressly invited to recommend
alternative approaches that could reduce the cost burden. For example,
are there certain airplanes or certain models of airplanes not
discussed in this document that should be excluded from this proposed
rule, and if so, what is the rationale for excluding these airplanes?
Recognizing that a change in the proposed number of required parameters
or the elimination of certain proposed parameters could significantly
alter the costs involved, are there other, less costly means to obtain
the information needed for accident and incident investigations? The
FAA recognizes that cost could be reduced by further extending the
compliance schedule; at the same time, NTSB needs critical information
in a timely manner to complete its investigations effectively. If the
compliance schedule is extended further, are there incentives that
would encourage operators to comply earlier?
Commenters advocating a different regulatory approach are strongly
encouraged to set forth specific recommendations and explain both the
costs and benefits involved in the changes recommended. The FAA will
weigh any recommendations with particular care, and it can do so only
if meaningful cost and safety data are provided.
Part 121
The FAA proposes to amend Sec. 121.344 and add a new Sec. 121.344a.
Current Sec. 121.343 is not being revised because it is necessary to
retain the current regulations for airplanes that are excluded from
compliance with these proposed amendments. Airplanes specifically
excluded from the proposed FDR upgrade include State 2 airplanes that
are subject to the phased compliance rules of Sec. 91.801(c). Following
considerable analysis, the FAA has determined that, if they remain
Stage 2, these airplanes do not have enough remaining useful life to
justify the cost of FDR retrofit proposed by this document. The FAA has
also proposed that certain other aircraft types that are no longer in
production and are in limited use in air carrier operations be excluded
because the cost associated with retrofitting these airplanes with new
DFDR's would cause undue economic burden and would yield little safety
return.
The proposed amendments to Sec. 121.344 would require that all
turbine-engine powered transport category airplanes--including
airplanes having a seating capacity of 20-30 that were formerly
operated under part 135--record at least 18 specified parameters,
except for airplanes with more than two engines. In some cases,
compliance would require a retrofit of a flight data recorder and/or
the addition of sensors and wiring capable of recording the specified
parameters, or a reprogramming of the current recorder to accommodate
the specified parameters. Requirements for DFDR's on newer airplanes
and newly manufactured airplanes are also being revised to require the
recordation of additional parameters.
On December 20, 1995, the FAA published a final rule ``Commuter
Operations and General Certification and Operations Requirements'' (60
FR 65832, FAA Docket No. 28154), which requires airplanes having a
passenger seating configuration, excluding any required crewmember
seat, of 10 to 19 seats to be operated under part 121. That rule did
not address FDR's because this rulemaking project was in process.
Proposed new Sec. 121.344a would apply to those airplanes formerly
operated under part 135.
Proposed Sec. 121.344 would require Boeing 737 airplanes to be
equipped with the expanded flight data recorder systems recommended by
the NTSB as part of the retrofit of the overall active fleet. The FAA
determined that compliance with the NTSB recommendation to retrofit
these airplanes by December 31, 1995, would have resulted in
substantial airplane groundings and very high associated costs.
Furthermore, if operators had been required to retrofit all Boeing 737
airplanes before the end of 1995, each of these airplanes might have
had to undergo a second retrofit to meet the expanded requirements
depending on what is adopted as a result of NTSB Safety Recommendation
A-95-26 and-27, discussed earlier in this document.
Accordingly, this proposed rule reflects the FAA's adoption of the
ARAC working group suggestion that NTSB recommendations A-95-25 and A-
95-26 be consolidated for rulemaking purposes.
Requirements for Transport Category Airplanes
Proposed Sec. 121.344(a): This paragraph lists the operating
parameters that would be required to be recorded by DFDR's required by
this section. The list is consistent with both European standards and
the parameters recommended by the NTSB in its ``Proposed FDR
enhancements for newly manufactured airplanes.'' The ARAC working group
used the European standards and the NTSB proposal as a basis for this
list of parameters and made minor revisions to it that would apply to
both new and in-service airplanes.
The parameters listed in this paragraph are presented in order of
their priority. Where the rule requires the recording of additional
parameters based on the capability of installed equipment, the
additional parameters should be selected in the order given in this
paragraph. In some instances, individual parameters need only be
[[Page 37151]]
recorded if the equipment needed is already installed in the airplane.
For example, angle of attack, Sec. 121.344(a)(32) need only be recorded
if the sensor for that parameter is already installed. These parameters
are designated ``when an information source is installed.'' In any
instance, if a sensor is installed, the data must be made available to
the FDR, unless it would compromise a critical function. Individual
members of the ARAC working group suggested that something other than a
``critical function'' be used as a basis. After further consideration,
the FAA has determined that the term critical function is well
understood by aircraft manufacturers in terms of FDR functions, and no
new terms will be introduced.
The introductory text to paragraph (a) also explains that when the
phrase ``when an information source is installed'' is used, it
indicates that no change in equipment was intended in requiring this
parameter to be recorded. Although the parameters are listed in
priority order in this paragraph, the ARAC considered that some of the
parameters that carry the designated text should be required only when
the recording system on the airplane is sufficient to record these
parameters. Where recording one of the parameters that includes the
noted phrase would require new equipment such as a DFDAU or recorder,
that parameter is not required to be recorded.
Airplanes Manufactured on or Before October 11, 1991
Proposed Sec. 121.344(b): Except for certain older airplanes
(identified below), this paragraph establishes a final compliance date
of [insert date 4 years from the effective date of the final rule], for
all turbine-engine powered transport category airplanes manufactured on
or before October 11, 1991. By that date, all affected airplanes must
be equipped with a DFDR that is capable of recording the first 17 (or
18) parameters listed in Sec. 121.344(a).
Proposed Sec. 121.344(b)(1) would apply to airplanes that were not
equipped with a flight data acquisition unit on [insert date of
publication of NPRM], and currently record 11 parameters of flight
data. The recordation of lateral acceleration, paragraph (a)(18), would
be required for certain airplanes with more than two engines only if
the capacity to record this parameter is available on the FDR.
Information obtained during the rulemaking process indicated that for
airplanes that were manufactured on or before October 11, 1991 that
have more than two engines, the recording of lateral acceleration could
exceed the capacity of installed recorders and would require an
expensive equipment retrofit for the sake of one parameter.
These non-FDAU airplanes would be required to record these
parameters within the ranges, accuracies, and intervals specified in
current Appendix B to part 121. Although this rule would create a new
Appendix M, these older airplanes would continue to use the values in
Appendix B that are currently in effect in order to stay within the
capacity of installed recorders and other data acquisition equipment.
Proposed Sec. 121.344(b)(2) would apply to airplanes that were
equipped with a FDAU on [insert date of publication of NPRM] and
currently are required under Sec. 121.343 to record 17 parameters of
flight data. These airplanes would be required to record the parameters
listed in paragraphs (a)(1) through (a)(22) by [insert date 4 years
from publication of the NPRM]. This installation would be required at
the next heavy maintenance check that occurs after 2 years from the
effective date of the final rule, but no later than [insert date 4
years after date of final rule]. Airplanes with FDAU's would be
required to record the parameters within the ranges, accuracies,
resolutions and recording intervals specified in proposed Appendix M to
part 121. Proposed new Appendix M provides the ranges, accuracies,
resolutions, and recording intervals for all parameters listed in
paragraphs (a)(1) through (a)(88). In some instances, the values for
certain parameters have been increased over those in current Appendix
B.
For all airplanes covered by proposed Sec. 121.344(b), the
parameters listed in paragraphs (a)(12) through (a)(17) may be recorded
from a single source.
Proposed Sec. 121.344(c)(1) would require that as of [insert date 4
years after effective date of final rule], all turbine-engine powered
transport category airplanes that were manufactured on or before
October 11, 1991, and that were equipped with a digital data bus and an
ARINC 717 digital flight data acquisition unit (DFDAU) or its
equivalent on [insert publication date of NPRM], record the parameters
listed in paragraphs (a)(1) through (a)(22). Paragraph (c)(1) would
also require that the parameters be recorded in accordance with the
specifications in proposed Appendix M. This paragraph would also permit
the parameters described in paragraphs (a)(12) through (a)(14) to be
recorded from a single source.
Proposed Sec. 121.344(c)(2) introduces the term ``recording
system'' which includes the DFDAU or equivalent and the DFDR. This
paragraph would require that, based on the capacity of the recording
system, all additional parameters (beyond those required by (c)(1)) for
which there is capacity on the recorder system must be recorded in the
order given in paragraph (a) and in accordance with the values listed
in Appendix M.
The term ``recording system'' was adopted to identify the
components in question so as not to require upgraded equipment on
airplanes retrofitted to meet the proposed requirements. Thus,
additional parameters need only be recorded when such parameters are
within the capacity of the flight data recordation system installed on
any airplane. That term is used again later in the regulation.
Proposed Sec. 121.344(c)(3) would require airplanes that were
subject to Sec. 121.343(e) to continue to meet the requirements of that
section until compliance with paragraph (c)(1) is accomplished.
Paragraph (c) brings forward and upgrades the requirements of
current Sec. 121.343(e). That section was originally adopted to require
airplanes that were capable of recording more than the minimum required
parameters to do so. At the time it was adopted, Sec. 121.343(e)
referenced the ARINC 717 DFDAU because it was the ``state of the art,''
and the capability of recording additional parameters existed. The
adoption of Sec. 121.343(e) reflected the FAA's growing awareness that
the information gained by recording additional FDR parameters was
important. Accordingly, Sec. 121.344(c) of the proposed rule requires
that airplanes subject to that section continue to record those
parameters that they are capable of recording, whether they are
equipped with an ARINC 717 or an equivalent DFDAU. When these airplanes
comply with proposed paragraph (c)(1), they would be recording the
parameters listed in (a)(1) through (a)(22), plus all additional
parameters they are capable of recording, and all of these must be
recorded in accordance with proposed new Appendix M. These provisions
are proposed to prevent a possible decrease in the number of parameters
already being recorded before the compliance date of the proposed
regulation.
Airplanes Manufactured After October 11, 1991
A significant portion of the work of the ARAC working group was
focused on the requirements for airplanes not yet built. Airplanes for
which no type certificate yet exists were seen as less of a problem. To
that end, discussions focused on the ability of manufacturers
[[Page 37152]]
to re-engineer airplanes that are already type certificated, and the
time needed to accomplish that engineering, get FAA approval of the
change in type design, and incorporate it into airplanes on the
production line. Significant discussion also occurred on the best way
to describe the airplanes that were to be covered by future
requirements. For example, a newer ``model'' of an airplane recently
type certificated might already be in the works, with a significant
investment in the engineering. Further, there is no standard industry
terminology for what the ``next version'' of an already certificated
airplane might be called. Finally, the number of parameters to be
recorded by these future airplanes was also part of the discussion, and
included consideration of flight data recorder requirements that will
be included in the operating rules of the Joint Aviation Authorities of
Europe (JAR-Ops).
The proposed regulation places airplanes manufactured after October
11, 1991, into three groups, with DFDR requirements increasing as age
decreases. These airplane groups and the requirements that apply to
each were the subject of considerable discussion within the ARAC
working group.
Because there was little agreement on the terminology to be used or
the time necessary to incorporate upgrades into future aircraft models
at the least cost, the requirements that would apply to future
production airplanes remained one of the most contentious issues in the
working group.
The FAA began discussions with the recommendations of the NTSB that
would require an upgrade to 88 parameters of recorded data for all
airplanes manufactured after 1998, regardless of the date of type
certification of models then in production. Representatives of airplane
manufacturers on the working group indicated that this was unrealistic
given the time needed to re-engineer airplanes in production, get FAA
approval of the design changes, and incorporate the modifications into
airplanes on the assembly line that had been on order, in some
instances, years before the requirements were written. The ARAC
industry members thus suggested an alternative requirement that would
apply to airplanes that receive a new or amended type certificate
beginning one year after the final rule becomes effective. This
alternative would mean that airplanes produced under a type certificate
that existed before that date might never be required to upgrade to 88
parameters, even if manufactured 10 years after the rule went into
effect, if the type design were not amended. The NTSB considers this
unacceptable, and describes it as a parallel to the current
circumstances where technological development and capability have far
outpaced current regulations. Further, the NTSF notes that a letter
requirement will in the future place the FAA and the industry in the
same circumstances that exist today in attempting to catch up with
available technology.
There was also considerable debate within the working group over
the recording equipment that might be necessary to record the 88
parameters of information proposed. Little hard data was available
concerning whether the current 128-word recorders would be able to
handle the 88-parameter requirement. Several members indicated that a
256-word recorder would likely be needed, and that since no such
recorder was currently available or approved for use, no regulation
that would require its use could be promulgated. Similarly, data were
available to indicate that while there was no 256-word recorder
currently available, the reason was that there was no current market
for it. Informal inquiries by the NTSB to equipment manufacturers
indicated that a 256-word recorder is well within the bounds of
currently available technology, and may well already exist.
Taking into account the NTSB concern that all new airplanes be able
to record the maximum number of parameters, balanced against the
knowledge that airplanes in production cannot be re-engineered without
sufficient lead time, the FAA has determined that FDR requirements for
future airplane production will be based on the date of manufacture,
but that the dates suggested by the NTSB cannot realistically be met
without incurring overwhelming costs and unacceptable delays in
production. Accordingly, the proposed rule would place the following
requirements on newly manufactured airplanes.
The first group of airplanes, addressed in proposed
Sec. 121.344(d)(1), are those manufactured after October 11, 1991, but
on or before [insert date three years from effective date, i.e. 2000]
to record the parameters listed in paragraphs (a)(1) through (a)(34),
and do so in accordance with Appendix M. Similar to the requirements
for older airplanes, the parameters listed in paragraphs (a)(12)
through (a)(14) could be recorded from a single source. Proposed
Sec. 121.344(d)(2) carries forward the requirements that all additional
parameters that are within the capacity of the recording system must
also be installed to take advantage of the latest advancements in
technology and the capabilities of individual airplanes. Because this
requirement will apply to airplanes recently produced, it is a retrofit
requirement, but the effect of the retrofit is softened by limiting the
requirement to the first 34 parameters.
The second group of airplanes, addressed in proposed
Sec. 121.344(e)(1), are those that will be manufactured after [insert
date three years from effective date, i.e. 1999], but on or before
[insert date five years from effective date, or 2001]. These airplanes
would be required to record the parameters listed in paragraphs (a)(1)
through (a)(57), and to do so in accordance with Appendix M. Proposed
Sec. 121.344(e)(2) carries forward the requirements that all additional
parameters that are within the capacity of the recording system must
also be installed to take advantage of the latest advancements in
technology and the capabilities of individual airplanes.
This group of airplanes is considered to include the already
engineered versions of currently certificated airplanes, and any
airplane getting a new type certificate during this time period. The
three year time period was considered by several members of the working
group as sufficient lead time to incorporate the upgrades required. The
number of parameters was chosen based on the recommendations of the
NTSB and the 57 parameters that will be required to be recorded under
JAR-Ops, which will become effective in 1998.
The third group of airplanes, addressed in proposed
Sec. 121.344(f), are those that would be manufactured after [insert
date five years from effective date]. These airplanes would be required
to record the parameters listed in paragraphs (a)(1) through (a)(88),
and to do so in accordance with Appendix M.
As indicated in the previous discussion, this requirement would
apply to all airplanes manufactured five years after the effective date
of the rule. The FAA agrees with the NTSB that it is not acceptable to
adopt a requirement that could allow airplanes with 57 parameters to be
produced indefinitely. The concept of ``manufactured after'' was
established in the FDR requirements of Sec. 121.343 and is being used
in other sections of this proposed rule. The ``manufactured after''
standard is viewed as being the most straightforward for the agency to
administer and for the industry to comply with. Further, during the
meetings of the ARAC working group, a lead time of five years was
consistently mentioned as the working standard for new airplane design.
[[Page 37153]]
The FAA did raise another alternative that would require all 88
parameters to be recorded on any airplane for which a new, amended, or
supplemental type certificate is applied for one year after the
effective date of the final rule. That proposal would have included, by
necessity, significant deviation authority for any changes to airplanes
that did not affect the operational or performance characteristics of
airplanes, or that did not provide sufficient opportunity to accomplish
the necessary modifications. That proposal was made after considerable
discussion regarding the lack of consistent terminology regarding new
airplane models. In designing the proposal, the FAA looked to its
experience in similar equipment upgrade requirements and concluded that
it would be necessary for the agency to retain exclusive discretion as
to what constituted enough of a change to an airplane design (by
amended or supplemental type certificate) to cause the FDR upgrade
requirements to apply, or for a deviation to be granted.
The FAA determined that, while that proposal had a sound regulatory
foundation and would be triggered by well-established events that would
not be the source of semantic debate, it would be unwieldy in practice
and would lead to considerable extra work and expenditures for the
agency and every future applicant for an amended or supplemental type
certificate.
The proposed requirement to record 88 parameters may require the
installation of the 256-word recorder described previously. The FAA is
unable to accept the argument that simply because a 256-word recorder
is not currently marketed or approved for installation in aircraft, it
would not be available by the time the proposed requirement would take
effect, five years after the effective date of a final rule. The FAA
has experience in proposing requirements for new technology. For
example, the technology for TCAS systems existed at the time the FAA
promulgated a requirement for the equipment, but it was not
commercially available in the format into which it eventually evolved.
In a similar sense, air carriers strongly urged the FAA to authorize
the use of predictive windshear technology in lieu of current reactive
technology despite the fact that the technology was only expected to be
available at some unspecified future date.
In this case, information available to the FAA and the NTSB
suggests that the 256-word recorder that may be needed to record 88
parameters is close to being a reality, since the technology already
exists. The FAA and NTSB expect the 256-word recorder to be
commercially available as soon as some commercial demand exists.
Neither the FAA nor NTSB can accept the argument of current
unavailability as a basis for not imposing a more stringent requirement
on future-production airplanes, and the FAA has received no evidence
indicating that this position is not realistic. The FAA specifically
requests comment on this issue concerning the probable availability of
such equipment.
Except for paragraphs (j) and (l), the balance of proposed
Sec. 121.344 carries forward the rest of the requirements of
Sec. 121.343.
Proposed Sec. 121.344(g) would duplicate current Sec. 121.343(g),
which requires an FDR's continuous operation from the time of an
airplane's takeoff roll to its landing roll, except for a minor,
nonsubstantive editorial change.
Proposed Sec. 121.344(h) would duplicate Sec. 121.343(h), which
addresses the number of hours of recorded data that needs to be kept,
and erasures of that data, except for minor, nonsubstantive editorial
changes.
Proposed Sec. 121.344(i) would duplicate current Sec. 121.343(i),
which addresses requirements pursuant to flight data in the event of an
accident or occurrence that requires immediate notification of the
NTSB, except for minor, nonsubstantive editorial changes.
Proposed Sec. 121.344(j) addresses the equipment installation and
correlation requirements of 14 CFR part 25 for transport category
airplanes. This paragraph was rewritten to reflect current technology
and the need for correlation data retention. No significant change in
the duty of air carriers to retain this data is intended by this update
of this regulation.
Proposed Sec. 121.344(k) would duplicate current Sec. 121.343(k),
which requires an approved device to locate a flight data recorder
under water, except for minor, nonsubstantive editorial changes.
Proposed Sec. 121.344(l) would identify those airplanes to which
these proposals would not apply.
Paragraph (l)(1) addresses Stage 2 airplanes that are scheduled to
be retired under the noise transition regulations of Part 91. These
airplanes would not have to be retrofitted with upgraded DFDR's prior
to December 31, 1999. However, no Stage 2 airplane would be allowed to
be operated after December 31, 1999, unless it meets the upgraded FDR
requirements. Although the noise transition regulations allow for the
possibility that some Stage 2 airplanes would be allowed to operate
under certain limited waivers, the intent behind the noise operating
rules differs significantly from the intent behind the FDR
requirements. Accordingly, the FAA is not willing to allow the
continued operation of these airplanes with 11-parameter recorders
beyond the final noise compliance date regardless of an airplane's
noise operating status, and the agency will not put itself in a
position of having to forgo the safety considerations behind FDR
upgrades as an economic matter if a change in circumstances causes a
change in the noise operating rules whether by waiver or a change in
the regulations. Noise waivers are not a certainty, and operators have
been warned not to presume that they will be granted as a matter of
course and to plan for full compliance. No such waiver is included in
these proposed FDR requirements; the FAA views the grant of any such
FDR waiver as encouraging operators to gamble on the availability of
noise waivers as an excuse not to install upgraded flight data
recorders, undermining the intent of both the noise transition and FDR
upgrade rules.
Paragraph (l)(2) lists those airplanes that are out of production.
After considering analysis of data presented by aircraft operators and
manufacturers, the ARAC working group determined that the remaining
economic life of these airplanes is insufficient to justify the cost
associated with extensive DFDR retrofit. Further, the number of these
airplanes in operation is sufficiently small and is declining, such
that any safety return from expanded FDR's would be minimal. The FAA
agrees in the selection of the aircraft types listed. The FAA also
specifically requests that commenters submit other aircraft types, if
any, that should be included in this list. Submissions for inclusion
should include a detailed explanation of the reasons why these aircraft
should be included on the list, and the number of aircraft that would
be affected.
Specific Comments Concerning Proposed Sec. 121.344
A significant comment was submitted through the ARAC Executive
Committee from Trans World Airlines (TWA), which did not have a
separate representative on the working group. In general, TWA expressed
difficulty with the proposed requirements for certain of its older
airplanes, the Lockheed L-1011 and the Boeing 747-100. TWA indicates
that, to meet the requirements of the proposed rule, it would have to
replace recording equipment in more than a third of its airplanes, and
one of the premises of the working group was that significant equipment
replacement would not be required for older
[[Page 37154]]
airplanes. To that end, TWA recommended several specific changes to the
proposed rule language and Appendix values that would allow its Loral
F800 flight data recorders to continue to be used.
The existence of older recording systems, including the Loral F800,
was the subject of considerable discussion at the working group
meetings. In an attempt to accommodate some of this older equipment,
for example, Sec. 121.344(b)(1)(i) was added to not require the
recordation of lateral acceleration on airplanes with more than two
engines unless recording that parameter could be accommodated on
installed equipment. That provision was added to accommodate the Loral
F800 recorder installed on the L-1011. The FAA is concerned that
broader changes to the proposed rule--including revisions to the values
in current Appendix B and a new category of aircraft that would change
the established manufacturing-date groups--would weaken the intent of
the rule by allowing loopholes and exceptions that would be almost
impossible to track, and would result in an unmanageable number of
different recording capabilities within the part 121 fleet. The FAA
will not promulgate rules to accommodate one or two older pieces of
equipment, especially when the intent of the rule is to upgrade
equipment in airplanes that remain viable portions of the fleet.
However, the FAA is willing to make what accommodations are within
the spirit of the rulemaking, as in the example cited above, where such
accommodation does not change the effect of the rule in general on the
rest of the fleet. Accordingly, while the agency will not consider
changes to existing rules that are a step back from current
requirements, TWA, and other operators that may find themselves in
unique circumstances because of equipment configurations, are urged to
comment specifically on provisions that they feel they will not be able
to meet without undue burden, and to suggest limited provisions such as
the one cited that may alleviate some of that burden.
A U.S. aircraft manufacturer commented through the ARAC Executive
Committee that to record parameters (a)(58) through (a)(88) would
``require the installation of sensors [that have] a poor reliability
history.'' The NTSB agrees that there is a question as to the
reliability of control force sensors over the full range of forces, but
it is this very unreliability of the current generation of sensors for
control forces that has caused the NTSB to recomment that 88 parameters
be recorded. The FAA requests comment from manufacturers and operators
as to the current reliability rates for control force sensors, and what
plans may exist for increasing their reliability before they would be
required in five years.
Airplanes With 10-19 Passenger Seats
The February 1995 recommendations of the NTSB did not specifically
address airplanes that carry 10-19 passengers. However, the adoption of
new operating rules for certain airplanes formerly operated under part
135 has led to a need for the FAA to address FDR requirements for these
airplanes. Since these airplanes will, in scheduled service, be
operated under part 121, the FAA has determined that the FDR
requirements that would apply to these airplanes are best provided in a
separate section. Accordingly, the FAA is proposing the adoption of a
new Sec. 121.344a, to separate these requirements from those applicable
to transport category airplanes and prevent confusion as to
applicability and compliance times.
Proposed Sec. 121.344a(a) would require all turbine-engine powered
airplanes having a passenger seating configuration, excluding any
required crewmember seat, of 10 to 19 seats that were brought onto the
U.S. register after October 11, 1991, to be equipped with a DFDR that
is capable of recording, at a minimum, the parameters required in
Sec. 135.152. This provision would carry over the current requirements
of part 135 until the upgraded standard in the proposed rule is met.
By [4 years from the effective date of the final rule], those
airplanes would be required to be equipped with a DFDR that is capable
of recording the parameters listed in Sec. 121.344 (a)(1) through
(a)(11). In addition, these airplanes must record either three
additional parameters of control input or control surface position. If
capable of being recorded, these airplanes must also record the
parameters described in Sec. 121.344 (a)(19) through (a)(22).
As stated in the proposed rule language, parameter (a)(18) would
not be required for airplanes with more than two engines, unless
sufficient capacity is available on the existing recorder. Further, the
parameters listed in paragraphs (a)(12) through (a)(17) would be
permitted to be recorded from a single source. All of the parameters
would be required to be recorded in accordance with the values listed
in Appendix B to part 135, the standard in the current rule, unless the
parameter to be recorded has no value indicated in that appendix. In
that case, the values in Appendix B to part 121 would be used.
Consistent with current regulation, airplanes with 10 to 19
passenger seats that were brought onto the U.S. register on or before
October 11, 1991, would not be required to comply with this regulation.
The FAA has determined that the cost of retrofitting this fleet of
airplanes would be substantial.
However, the FAA is concerned that all airplanes used in air
carrier operations be equipped with FDR equipment. Accordingly, the FAA
has determined that the already established date for installation of
FDR equipment--airplanes brought onto the U.S. register after October
11, 1991--will remain the standard for FDR installation if these
airplanes are operated under part 121.
Further, the FAA emphasizes that, consistent with current
regulation, airplanes that may have been on the register on or before
October 11, 1991, but were removed from the U.S. register, and brought
back onto the U.S. register after October 11, 1991, would be required
under this proposed rule to have a DFDR capable of recording the
required 18 to 22 parameters. There has been at least one previous
policy determination made concerning airplanes that have been removed
from the U.S. register after 1991 and then brought back; that policy
stated that compliance with the FDR rules of part 135 is not necessary
because the airplane was on the register before October 11, 1991. After
further consideration, however, the FAA has determined that this policy
is inconsistent with the language of the regulation itself and with the
intent of the recently adopted rules bringing part 135 scheduled
commuters under part 121. Airplanes that have been operated without
FDR's based on this policy determination will have to be retrofitted
with the FDR equipment required under Sec. 121.344a(a) by the
compliance date proposed in that paragraph, as they would have if they
remained under part 135.
Although the basic requirements for 10-19 seat airplanes are not
identical to those for transport category airplanes in Sec. 121.344, it
was determined that some differences could exist without compromising
safety. These airplanes currently are required to record 17 parameters
of information under part 135.152; the 18 parameters to be recorded
under the proposed rule differ slightly and will require that some
FDR's be reprogrammed. The FAA found, however, that requiring an
increase to the first 23 parameters would result in substantial costs.
Since the NTSB recommendations do not
[[Page 37155]]
address these airplanes or any specific upgrade for their flight data
recorders, a determination has been made that recordation of the first
18 parameters--or 22 where capable--is sufficient for this class of
airplanes.
The ARAC Executive Committee submitted a comment from a member
indicating that the applicability of proposed Sec. 121.344a(a) should
be changed to airplanes that were manufactured after October 11, 1991,
rather than airplanes brought onto the U.S. register after that date.
The FAA disagrees. This distinction by date of registration was
maintained as established in part 135, and the use of the registration
date has resulted in a specific set of airplanes to which these rules
apply. A change in the applicability of the regulation now could cause
airplanes that were previously required to have DFDR's to no longer
need them, with the consequences of recorders being removed from in-
service airplanes. A change in applicability under part 121 would also
have the confusing effect of establishing different applicability
provisions for the same airplanes, depending on the part under which
they are operated. The FAA will not introduce such complication into
the regulations nor promulgate a rule that would reduce the number of
airplanes required to have DFDR's.
Another comment stated that the FAA is proposing to cover 10-19
seat airplanes operated under part 121 ``with no technical support * *
* for their inclusion.'' The commenter suggests that the FAA ``abide by
the NTSB recommendation and remove these'' airplanes from the proposed
rule.
As stated previously, the NTSB recommendation was considered the
starting point for this rulemaking action. The NTSB recommendation did
not include consideration of the FAA's proposal to bring smaller
aircraft operated in scheduled service under part 135 into part 121, so
no recommendation for DFDR requirements on those airplanes could have
been included. However, as part of the FAA's goal of regulating all
scheduled operators under a single part, it would be inconsistent not
to propose that all airplanes operated in part 121 service be covered
by the same or comparable requirements. It is up to the FAA to
determine the proper scope and consistency of its regulations, and the
agency cannot be constrained by a recommendation of the NTSB that did
not consider other ongoing agency actions and initiatives. The NTSB did
not state that these airplanes not be covered--it simply never
addressed them. Further, it is not clear what the commenter means as to
the existence of ``technical support'' for a proposal that is but one
part of an overall agency safety initiative.
Proposed Sec. 121.344a(b) would require recorders on all turbine-
engine powered airplanes having a passenger seating configuration,
excluding any required crewmember seat, of 10 to 19 seats, that are
manufactured after [insert date 3 yrs after effective date of final
rule], to record the parameters listed in Sec. 121.344 (a)(1) through
(a)(57), as well as all additional parameters that are within the
capacity of the recording system within the ranges, accuracies,
resolutions, and recording intervals specified in Appendix M to part
121.
Proposed Sec. 121.344a(c) would require recorders on all turbine-
engine powered airplanes having a passenger seating configuration,
excluding any required crewmember seat, of 10 to 19 seats, that are
manufactured after [insert date 5 yrs after effective date of final
rule], to record the parameters listed in Sec. 121.344 (a)(1) through
(a)(88), within the ranges, accuracies, resolutions, and recording
intervals specified in Appendix M to part 121. This is the same
requirement that would apply to transport category airplanes as
proposed in Sec. 121.344, and the same reasons for its adoption
applies.
Proposed Sec. 121.344a(d) would bring forward the appropriate
references in current Sec. 135.152(f), pursuant to airplanes only,
which includes requirements for installation of flight recorders and
correlation of flight data. Rotorcraft requirements would remain in
Sec. 135.152(f); they are not being addressed in this rulemaking.
Proposed Sec. 121.344a(e) would require all airplanes subject to
this section to also comply with paragraphs (g)-(k) of Sec. 121.344.
Proposed Sec. 121.344a(f) would identify those airplanes to which
these proposals would not apply. Included are airplanes that are no
longer in production. After considering analysis of data presented by
aircraft operators and manufacturers, the ARAC working group determined
that the remaining economic life of these airplanes is insufficient to
justify the cost associated with extensive DFDR retrofit. Further, the
number of these airplanes in operation is sufficiently small that any
safety return from expanded FDR's would be minimal. The FAA agrees in
the selection of the aircraft types listed. The FAA also specifically
requests that commenters submit other aircraft types, if any, that
should be included in this list. Submissions for inclusion should
include a detailed explanation of the reasons why these aircraft should
be included on the list, and the number of aircraft that would be
affected.
New Appendix
Proposed Appendix M: This new appendix would correspond directly to
the parameter list set forth in Sec. 121.344(a), and would present the
ranges, accuracies, resolutions, and recording intervals for each
parameter. Values for these items were determined based on the capacity
of current equipment and take into consideration the European
standards. Where possible, the standards in Appendix M are the same as
those in the European requirements.
Specific Comments Concerning Proposed Appendix M
Several specific changes to Appendix M were submitted in the
comments from the ARAC Executive Committee. The addition of TSO C51a to
the Accuracy column of the Pressure Altitude parameter was reviewed and
accepted. One comment stated that the Heading parameter, which would
require a true/mag discrete is unclear and that the two should be
separated. A significant amount of time was expended in working group
discussions on this topic, and the designation as it appears in the
proposed Appendix was agreed to by working group members. A comment
concerning Manual radio transmitter keying states that existing
installations should only require a single discrete. That is all that
is required, and only for air traffic communications. A further comment
that language should be added to exclude digital voice and data
transmissions is not being addressed because there is no requirement
that digital data link transmissions be included as part of this
parameter.
Part 125
The FAA proposes to add a new Sec. 125.226 to require the existing
airplane fleet operated under part 125 to be retrofitted with FDR's
that record additional parameters. Requirements for DFDR's on newer
airplanes and newly manufactured airplanes would also be revised to
require that additional parameters be recorded. The preceding
discussion for the proposed amendments to part 121 also applies to
aircraft operated under part 125. The text in Sec. 125.225 would remain
unchanged because airplanes excluded from these proposed amendments
would be required to continue to comply with that section.
Proposed Appendix E: This new appendix to part 125 would be
identical
[[Page 37156]]
to the proposed Appendix M to part 121 above.
Part 129
The FAA proposes to add a new Sec. 129.20, Digital Flight Data
Recorders, to address flight data recorder regulations for U.S.-
registered airplanes operated outside the United States. Although the
NTSB recommendations did not apply to part 129 operators, the FAA has
determined that U.S.-registered airplanes, regardless of where they are
operated, should be required to comply with the same FDR requirements
as though they were operated domestically. Accordingly, the proposed
rule indicates that, depending on the airplane type, airplanes that are
U.S.-registered but operated outside the United States must comply with
the applicable flight data recorder regulations of part 121, 125, or
135. Descriptions of these requirements can be found above in the
sections describing the proposed amendments to those parts.
Consequently, the FAA proposes to revise the applicability of
Sec. 129.1(b) to include reference to the proposed Sec. 129.20.
The period for public comment to the proposed part 129 amendment is
no longer than that provided for the other proposals in this NPRM to
allow sufficient time for international entities to comment. Therefore,
the comment period for revisions to part 129 will be 120 days from the
date of publication of the NPRM, and the final rule for any revisions
to part 129 will be issued separately, although the compliance time
adopted may be the same as that proposed for parts 121, 125, and 135.
Part 135
These proposed flight data recorder amendments would apply to
turbine-engine-powered airplanes having a passenger seating
configuration, excluding any required crewmember seat, of 10 to 30
seats, that are manufactured after [insert date 3 years after effective
date of final rule] and operated under part 135. These requirements are
being proposed to parallel the requirements for the same airplanes
operated under part 121. These amendments would not apply to any
airplane type certificated to be configured with nine or fewer
passenger seats or any rotorcraft.
Proposed Sec. 135.152(f)(1) would retain the requirement from
current Sec. 135.152(f). A new Sec. 135.152(f)(2) is proposed that
would update the correlation data requirements for newly manufactured
airplanes.
Proposed new Sec. 135.152(h) would list the parameters that apply
to newly manufactured airplanes. This list is identical to the
parameter list proposed in Sec. 121.344.
Proposed Sec. 135.152(i) would require all turbine-engine powered
airplanes that are manufactured after [insert date three years after
effective date of final rule] to record the parameters listed in
paragraphs (h)(1) through (h)(57) of this part, as well as any
additional parameters capable of being recorded on the installed FDR
equipment, in accordance with proposed Appendix F to part 135.
Proposed Sec. 135.152(j) would require all turbine-engine powered
airplanes that are manufactured after [insert date 5 yrs after
effective date of final rule], to record the parameters listed in
paragraph (h)(1) through (88) of this section within the ranges,
accuracies, resolutions, and recording intervals specified in Appendix
F. This provision is identical as proposed in Sec. 121.344a(c), since
it would apply to the same airplanes, and the same reasons for its
adoption applies.
Proposed Appendix F: This new appendix would correspond directly to
the parameter list set forth in Sec. 135.152(h), and would present the
ranges, accuracies, resolutions, and recording intervals for each
parameter. This proposed appendix is identical to proposed Appendix M
to part 121.
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
[[Page 37157]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP16JY96.000
BILLING CODE 4910-13-C
[[Page 37158]]
International Compatibility
The FAA has reviewed corresponding International Civil Aviation
Organization regulations and Joint Aviation Authority regulations,
where they exist. Any differences between those documents and these
regulations are of a minor, technical nature, and are deemed
insignificant. They would not adversely affect harmonization.
Paperwork Reduction Act
No information collection is required by this proposed rule.
Regulatory Evaluation Summary
Proposed changes to Federal regulations must undergo several
economic analyses. First, Executive Order 12866 directs that each
Federal agency shall propose or adopt a regulation only upon a reasoned
determination that the benefits of the intended regulation justify its
costs. Second, the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 requires agencies
to analyze the economic effect of regulatory changes on small entities.
Third, the Office of Management and Budget directs agencies to assess
the effect of regulatory changes on international trade. A regulatory
evaluation of the proposal is in the docket.
Costs
To obtain representative and comprehensive information from which
to develop the industry costs of this proposed rule, the FAA relied on
the responses of ATA and RAA members to an air carrier cost survey
developed by the ARAC working group. (The FAA augmented this
information with adjusted costs analysis from the recently approved
commuter rule.) The principle aggregate cost detailed in the cost
survey were (1) equipment and inventory/spares; (2) engineering,
installation, and other costs, inclusive of recurrent maintenance
costs; and (3) aircraft out-of-service costs which reflect revenue
losses resulting from unscheduled aircraft downtime.
The total turbojet fleet costs for air carriers operating under
part 121 for the projected retrofits are $472.0 million ($420.4
million, discounted) if required to be done within a 2-year compliance
time frame. For a 4-year compliance time frame, the FAA estimates the
costs would be $308.9 million ($259.1 million, discounted). The
equivalent total turboprop fleet costs for air carriers operating under
part 121 are $39.0 million ($35.2 million, discounted) for the 2-year
compliance time frame, and $30.4 million ($25.8 million, discounted)
for the 4-year compliance time frame. The total 4-year compliance time
frame costs for part 135, 10-19 seat aircraft required to now operate
under part 121 are estimated to be $26.4 million ($22.3 million,
discounted) and for part 135, 20-30 seat aircraft, $10.9 million ($9.2
million, discounted), or $37.3 million ($31.5 million, discounted)
total part 135 costs. Thus, the total 4-year compliance time frame
discounted costs for the proposed retrofits required under this
proposed rule are $316.3 million.
With regard to the total turbojet fleet costs for air carriers
operating under part 121, nearly one-half the total cost for the 2-year
alternative represents the out-of-service costs or lost revenues that
would be imposed by the shorter compliance time requirement. The other
one-half of the total cost represents the basic costs which include
capital investment and expenses. In the 4-year time frame, just over 20
percent of the total cost represents the out-of-service costs or lost
revenues that would be imposed by this compliance time requirement. No
similar assessment can be made for either the turboprop fleet or part
135 carriers that will now be required to operate under part 121.
However, because the total turbojet fleet costs represent over 80
percent of the air carrier industry cost analyzed for this proposed
rule, the two year time frame suggests itself to clearly be a more
costly option than the four year time frame. The FAA's estimates of out
of service costs by aircraft type are summarized in the appendix to the
full Regulatory Evaluation. That document is available for review in
the regulatory docket.
Benefits
DFDR's do not in and of themselves prevent accidents; they are used
as an investigative tool when accidents or incidents occur. From the
DFDR information, a greater understanding of the dynamics and probable
causes of accidents and incidents can be obtained. With this knowledge,
a ``fix'' can be made to reduce the chance of a similar occurrence in
the future.
Due to the very nature of the DFDR requirements (i.e., that we
currently do not know how or why certain accidents occur), the FAA is
not able to quantify the likely benefits that will ultimately result
from this proposal. Nevertheless, the FAA has determined, particularly
in light of the NTSB recommendations, that information concerning
enhanced parameters can be collected cost-effectively. The FAA will be
able to use incident information to reduce accidents of the nature that
are currently of undetermined cause.
Benefit Cost Comparison
The FAA cautions that the cost analysis detailed in the preceding
sections is not necessarily exhaustive. The purpose of this rulemaking
is to require the installation of DFDR's that provide more flight
information about aviation accidents or incidents. This in turn, would
allow industry to predict certain trends in order to make the necessary
modifications prior to future accidents or incidents. Thus, it is
assumed that as a result of this rulemaking the quantity and quality of
information is increased about those accidents for which the NTSB
currently cannot determine the probable cause. To the extent that this
occurs, then the FAA would take appropriate additional action to
prevent a recurrence of those kinds of accidents.
Future FAA actions could take the form of Advisory Circulars,
Airworthiness Directives, or possibly, additional rulemakings. The
costs of these follow-on FAA actions could vary from negligible costs
to considerable costs of some unknown amount. The costs of such future
follow-on actions by the FAA should be taken into consideration as part
of the costs of this rulemaking. However, the costs of potential future
actions have not been included because the costs of such follow-on
actions cannot be estimated. It should be understood, therefore, that,
to the extent that the cost of the follow-on actions are more than
negligible, the current costs estimates would tend to underestimate the
total cost of this rulemaking.
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Determination
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA) was enacted by
Congress to ensure that small entities are not unnecessarily or
disproportionately burdened by Federal regulations. The RFA requires
regulatory agencies to review rules which may have ``a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.'' For this
proposed rulemaking, a ``small entity'' is an operator of aircraft for
hire owning, but not necessarily operating, nine (9) aircraft or less.
A ``substantial number of small entities'', as defined in FAA order
2100.14A-Regulatory Flexibility Criteria and Guidance, is a number (in
this instance, the number of operators) which is not less than eleven
and is more then one-third of the small entities subject to a proposed
or existing rule.
A ``significant economic impact'' or cost threshold, is defined as
an annualized net compliance cost level
[[Page 37159]]
that exceeds 1) $119,900 (1994 dollars) in the case of scheduled
operators of aircraft for hire whose entire fleet has a seating
capacity in excess of 60 seats; 2) $67,000 (1994 dollars) in the case
of scheduled operators of aircraft for hire for which the entire fleet
has a seating capacity less than or equal to 60 seats; and 3) $4,800
(1994 dollars) in the case of unscheduled operators of aircraft for
hire.
The FAA has determined the annualized costs (20 years) for
scheduled operators of large aircraft to be $9,128 per aircraft for the
2-year time frame and $5,611 per aircraft for the 4-year time frame.
Multiplying each of these estimates by 9, (the upper bound of the small
entity criteria) yields results of $82,155 and $50,501 for the 2-year
and 4-year time frames, respectively. Each of these estimates is
significantly below the minimum compliance cost criteria of $119,900
for scheduled operators of large aircraft.
The FAA has also determined the annualized costs (20 years) for
scheduled operators of small aircraft to be $4,378 per aircraft for the
2-year time frame and $3,067 per aircraft for the 4-year time frame.
The upper bound costs for consideration within the small entity (9
aircraft) criteria are $39,398 for the 2-year time frame and $27,603
for the 4-year time frame, respectively. Both are well below the
minimum compliance cost of $67,000.
International Trade Impact Assessment
The FAA has determined that revisions to digital flight data
recorder rules could have a significant impact on international trade.
The FAA is of the opinion that while the proposed rule will not effect
non-U.S. operators of foreign aircraft operating outside the United
States, it could have a significant impact on the suppliers of
materials required for retrofitting the affected aircraft in the
domestic fleet. Domestic sources of the required retrofit products may
not be able to meet the increased demand of the domestic air carriers
for DFDR's as these air carriers increased orders to meet the tight
compliance time-frame imposed by this proposed rule. Foreign producers
may benefit by supplying the unfilled orders. The FAA welcomes comments
on this issue from manufacturers and suppliers of the proposed retrofit
materials as well as other interested parties.
Conclusion
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, and based on the
findings in the Regulatory Flexibility Determination and the
International Trade Impact Analysis, the FAA has determined that this
proposed regulation would be a significant regulatory action under
Executive Order 12866, and is considered significant under DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979).
List of Subjects
14 CFR Part 121
Air carriers, Aviation safety, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Transportation
14 CFR Part 125
Aviation safety, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements
14 CFR Part 129
Air carriers, Aviation safety, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements
14 CFR Part 135
Aviation safety, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements
The Proposed Amendment
In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration proposes to amend 14 CFR parts 121, 125, 129, and 135 of
the Federal Aviation Regulations as follows:
PART 121--CERTIFICATION AND OPERATIONS: DOMESTIC, FLAG, AND
SUPPLEMENTAL AIR CARRIERS AND COMMERCIAL OPERATORS OF LARGE
AIRCRAFT
1. The authority citation for part 121 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 40119, 44101, 44701-44702,
44705, 44709-44711, 44713, 44716-44717, 44722, 44901, 44903-44904,
44912, 46105.
2. Section 121.344 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 121.344 Digital flight data recorders for transport category
airplanes.
(a) Except as provided in paragraph (l) of this section, no person
may operate under this part a turbine-engine-powered transport category
airplane unless it is equipped with one or more approved flight
recorders that use a digital method of recording and storing data and a
method of readily retrieving that data from the storage medium. The
operational parameters required to be recorded by digital flight data
recorders required by this section are as follows; the phrase ``when an
information source is installed'' following a parameter indicates that
recording of that parameter is not intended to require a change in
installed equipment:
(1) Time;
(2) Pressure altitude;
(3) Indicated airspeed;
(4) Heading--primary flight crew reference (if selectable, record
discrete, true or magnetic);
(5) Normal acceleration (Vertical);
(6) Pitch attitude;
(7) Roll attitude;
(8) Manual radio transmitter keying, or CVR/DFDR synchronization
reference;
(9) Thrust/power of each engine--primary flight crew reference;
(10) Autopilot engagement status;
(11) Longitudinal acceleration;
(12) Pitch control input;
(13) Lateral control input;
(14) Rudder pedal input;
(15) Primary pitch control surface position;
(16) Primary lateral control surface position;
(17) Primary yaw control surface position;
(18) Lateral acceleration;
(19) Pitch trim surface position or the parameters of paragraph
(a)(82) of this section, if currently recorded;
(20) Trailing edge flap or cockpit flap control selection (except
when the parameters of paragraph (a)(85) of this section apply);
(21) Leading edge flap or cockpit flap control selection (except
when the parameters of paragraph (a)(86) of this section apply);
(22) Each Thrust reverser position (or equivalent for propeller
airplane);
(23) Ground spoiler position or speed brake selection (except when
the parameters of paragraph (a)(87) of this section apply);
(24) Outside or total air temperature;
(25) Automatic Flight Control System (AFCS) modes and engagement
status, including autothrottle;
(26) Radio altitude (when an information source is installed);
(27) Localizer deviation, MLS Azimuth;
(28) Glideslope deviation, MLS Elevation;
(29) Marker beacon passage;
(30) Master warning;
(31) Air/ground sensor (primary airplane system reference nose or
main gear);
(32) Angle of attack (when information source is installed);
(33) Hydraulic pressure low (each system);
(34) Ground speed (when an information source is installed);
(35) Ground proximity warning system;
(36) Landing gear position or landing gear cockpit control
selection;
(37) Drift angle (when an information source is installed);
(38) Wind speed and direction (when an information source is
installed);
[[Page 37160]]
(39) Latitude and longitude (when an information source is
installed);
(40) Stick shaker/pusher (when an information source is installed);
(41) Windshear (when an information source is installed);
(42) Throttle/power lever position;
(43) Additional engine parameters (as designated in appendix M of
this part);
(44) Traffic alert and collision avoidance system;
(45) DME 1 and 2 distances;
(46) Nav 1 and 2 selected frequency;
(47) Selected barometric setting (when an information source is
installed);
(48) Selected altitude (when an information source is installed);
(49) Selected speed (when an information source is installed);
(50) Selected mach (when an information source is installed);
(51) Selected vertical speed (when an information source is
installed);
(52) Selected heading (when an information source is installed);
(53) Selected flight path (when an information source is
installed);
(54) Selected decision height (when an information source is
installed);
(55) EFIS display format;
(56) Multi-function/engine/alerts display format;
(57) Thrust command (when an information source is installed);
(58) Thrust target (when an information source is installed);
(59) Fuel quantity in CG trim tank (when an information source is
installed);
(60) Primary Navigation System Reference;
(61) Icing (when an information source is installed);
(62) Engine warning each engine vibration (when an information
source is installed);
(63) Engine warning each engine over temp. (when an information
source is installed);
(64) Engine warning each engine oil pressure low (when an
information source is installed);
(65) Engine warning each engine over speed (when an information
source is installed);
(66) Yaw trim surface position;
(67) Roll trim surface position;
(68) Brake pressure (selected system);
(69) Brake pedal application (left and right);
(70) Yaw or sideslip angle (when an information source is
installed);
(71) Engine bleed value position (when an information source is
installed);
(72) De-icing or anti-icing system selected (when an information
source is installed);
(73) Computed center of gravity (when an information source is
installed);
(74) AC electrical bus status;
(75) DC electrical bus status;
(76) APU bleed valve position (when an information source is
installed);
(77) Hydraulic pressure (each system);
(78) Loss of cabin pressure;
(79) Computer failure;
(80) Heads-up display (when an information source is installed);
(81) Para-visual display (when an information source is installed);
(82) Cockpit trim control input position--pitch;
(83) Cockpit trim control input position--roll;
(84) Cockpit trim control input position--yaw;
(85) Trailing edge flap and cockpit flap control position;
(86) Leading edge flap and cockpit flap control position;
(87) Ground spoiler position and speed brake selection; and
(88) All cockpit flight control input forces (control wheel,
control column, rudder pedal).
(b) For all turbine-engine powered transport category airplanes
manufactured on or before October 11, 1991, by [four years from
effective date of final rule]--
(1) For airplanes not equipped as of July 15, 1996 with a flight
data acquisition unit (FDAU), the parameters listed in paragraphs
(a)(1) through (a)(18) of this section must be recorded within the
ranges and accuracies specified in Appendix B of this part, and--
(i) For airplanes with more than two engines, the parameter
described in paragraph (a)(18) is not required unless sufficient
capacity is available on the existing recorder to record that
parameter;
(ii) Parameters listed in paragraphs (a)(12) through (a)(17) each
may be recorded from a single source.
(2) For airplanes that were equipped as July 16, 1996 with a flight
data acquisition unit (FDAU), the parameters listed in paragraphs
(a)(1) through (a)(22) of this section must be recorded within the
ranges, accuracies, and recording intervals specified in appendix M of
this part. Parameters listed in paragraphs (a)(12) through (a)(17) each
may be recorded from a single source.
(3) The approved flight recorder required by this section must be
installed at the earliest time practicable, but no later than the next
heavy maintenance check after [two years after effective date of final
rule], and no later than [four years after the effective date of the
final rule]. A heavy maintenance check is considered to be any time an
airplane is scheduled to be out of service for 4 or more days and is
scheduled to include access to major structural components.
(c) For all turbine-engine powered transport category airplanes
manufactured on or before October 11, 1991--
(1) That were equipped as of July 16, 1996 with one or more digital
data bus(es) and an ARINC 717 digital flight data acquisition unit
(DFDAU) or equivalent, the parameters specified in paragraphs (a)(1)
through (a)(22) of this section must be recorded within the ranges,
accuracies, resolutions, and sampling intervals specified in appendix M
of this part by [4 years after effective date of the final rule].
Parameters listed in paragraphs (a)(12) through (a)(14) each may be
recorded from a single source.
(2) Commensurate with the capacity of the recording system (DFDAU
or equivalent and the DFDR), all additional parameters for which
information sources are installed and which are connected to the
recording system, must be recorded within the ranges, accuracies,
resolutions, and sampling intervals specified in appendix M of this
part by [4 years after effective date of the final rule].
(3) That were subject to Sec. 121.343(e) of this part, all
conditions of Sec. 121.343(e) must continue to be met until compliance
with paragraph (c)(1) of this section is accomplished.
(d) For all turbine-engine-powered transport category airplanes
that were manufactured after October 11, 1991,--
(1) The parameters listed in paragraph (a)(1) through (a)(34) of
this section must be recorded within the ranges, accuracies,
resolutions, and recording intervals specified in appendix M of this
part by [4 years after the effective date of the final rule].
Parameters listed in paragraphs (a)(12) through (a)(14) each may be
recorded from a single source.
(2) Commensurate with the capacity of the recording system, all
additional parameters for which information sources are installed and
which are connected to the recording system, must be recorded within
the ranges, accuracies, resolutions, and sampling intervals specified
in appendix M of this part by [4 years after effective date of the
final rule].
(e) For all turbine-engine-powered transport category airplanes
that are manufactured after [3 years after effective date of final
rule]--
(1) The parameters listed in paragraph (a)(1) through (57) of this
section must be recorded within the ranges, accuracies, resolutions,
and recording intervals specified in appendix M of this part.
[[Page 37161]]
(2) Commensurate with the capacity of the recording system, all
additional parameters for which information sources are installed and
which are connected to the recording system, must be recorded within
the ranges, accuracies, resolutions, and sampling intervals specified
in appendix M of this part.
(f) For all turbine-engine-powered transport category airplanes
that are manufactured after [5 years after effective date of final
rule], the parameters listed in paragraph (a)(1) through (a)(88) of
this section must be recorded within the ranges, accuracies,
resolutions, and recording intervals specified in appendix M of this
part.
(g) Whenever a flight data recorder required by this section is
installed, it must be operated continuously from the instant the
airplane begins its takeoff roll until it has completed its landing
roll.
(h) Except as provided in paragraph (i) of this section, and except
for recorded data erased as authorized in this paragraph, each
certificate holder shall keep the recorded data prescribed by this
section, as appropriate, until the airplane has been operated for at
least 25 hours of the operating time specified in Sec. 121.359(a) of
this part. A total of 1 hour of recorded data may be erased for the
purpose of testing the flight recorder or the flight recorder system.
Any erasure made in accordance with this paragraph must be of the
oldest recorded data accumulated at the time of testing. Except as
provided in paragraph (i) of this section, no record need be kept more
than 60 days.
(i) In the event of an accident or occurrence that requires
immediate notification of the National Transportation Safety Board
under 49 CFR part 830 of its regulations and the results in termination
of the flight, the certificate holder shall remove the recorder from
the airplane and keep the recorder data prescribed by this section, as
appropriate, for at least 60 days or for a longer period upon the
request of the Board or the Administrator.
(j) Each flight data recorder system required by this section must
be installed in accordance with the requirements of Sec. 25.1459 (a),
(b), (d), and (e) of this chapter. A correlation must be established
between the values recorded by the flight data recorder and the
corresponding values being measured. The correlation must contain a
sufficient number of correlation points to accurately establish the
conversion from the recorded values to engineering units or discrete
state over the full operating range of the parameter. Except for
airplanes having separate altitude and airspeed sensors that are an
integral part of the flight data recorder system, a single correlation
may be established for any group of airplanes--
(1) That are of the same type;
(2) On which the flight recorder system and its installation are
the same; and
(3) On which there is no difference in the type design with respect
to the installation of those sensors associated with the flight data
recorder system. Documentation sufficient to convert recorded data into
the engineering units and discrete values specified in the applicable
appendix must be maintained by the certificate holder.
(k) Each flight data recorder required by this section must have an
approved device to assist in locating that recorder under water.
(l) The following airplanes need not comply with this section, but
must continue to comply with applicable paragraphs of Sec. 121.343 of
this chapter, as appropriate:
(1) Airplanes that meet the Stage 2 noise levels of part 36 of this
chapter and are subject to Sec. 91.801(c) of this chapter, until
January 1, 2000. On and after January 1, 2000, any Stage 2 airplane
otherwise allowed to be operated under part 91 of this chapter must
comply with the applicable flight data recorder requirements of this
section for that airplane.
(2) General Dynamics Convair 580, General Dynamics Convair 600,
General Dynamics Convair 640, de Havilland Aircraft Company Ltd. DHC-7,
Fairchild Aircraft, Inc., FH 227, Fokker F-27 (except Mark 50), F-28
Mark 1000 and Mark 4000, Gulfstream Aerospace G-159, Lockheed Aircraft
Corporation Electra 10-A, Lockheed Aircraft Corporation Electra 10-B,
Lockheed Aircraft Corporation Electra 10-E, Maryland Air Industries,
Inc. F27, Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. YS-11, Short Bros. Limited
SD3-30, Short Bros. Limited SD3-60.
3. Section 121.344a is added to read as follows:
Sec. 121.344a Digital flight data recorders for 10-19 seat airplanes.
(a) No person may operate a turbine-engine-powered airplane having
a passenger seating configuration, excluding any required crewmember
seat, of 10 to 19 seats, that was brought onto the U.S. register after
October 11, 1991, unless it is equipped with one or more approved
flight recorders that use a digital method of recording and storing
data and a method of readily retrieving that data from the storage
medium. On or before [4 years after the effective data of the final
rule], airplanes brought onto the U.S. register after October 11, 1991,
must comply with either the requirements in this section or the
applicable paragraphs in Sec. 135.152 of this chapter. In addition, by
[4 years after the effective date of the final rule]--
(1) The parameters listed in Secs. 121.344(a)(1) through
121.344(a)(11) must be recorded within the ranges, accuracies, and
resolutions specified in appendix B of part 135 of this chapter, except
that--
(i) Either the parameter listed in Sec. 121.344(a)(12) or (a)(15)
must be recorded; either the parameter listed in Sec. 121.344(a)(13) or
(a)(16) must be recorded; and either the parameter listed in
Sec. 121.344(a)(14) or (a)(17) must be recorded.
(ii) For airplanes with more than two engines, the parameter
described in Sec. 121.344(a)(18) must also be recorded if sufficient
capacity is available on the existing recorder to record that
parameter;
(iii) Parameters listed in Secs. 121.344(a)(12) through
121.344(a)(17) each may be recorded from a single source;
(iv) Any parameter for which no value is contained in appendix B of
part 135 of this chapter must be recorded within the ranges,
accuracies, and resolutions specified in appendix B of this part.
(2) Commensurate with the capacity of the recording system (FDAU or
equivalent and the DFDR), the parameters listed in sections
121.344(a)(19) through 121.344(a)(22) also must be recorded within the
ranges, accuracies, resolutions, and recording intervals specified in
appendix B of part 135 of this chapter.
(3) The approved flight recorder by this section must be installed
as soon as practicable, but no later than the next heavy maintenance
check or equivalent after [two years after effective date of final
rule]. A heavy maintenance check is considered to be any time an
airplane is scheduled to be out of service for 4 or more days and is
scheduled to include access to major structural components.
(b) For all turbine-engine-powered airplanes having a passenger
seating configuration, excluding any required crewmember seat of 10 to
19 seats, that are manufactured after [three years from effective date
of final rule]--
(1) The parameters listed in sections 121.344(a)(1) through
121.344(a)(57) must be recorded within the ranges, accuracies,
resolutions, and recording intervals specified in appendix M of this
part.
(2) Commensurate with the capacity of the recording system, all
additional
[[Page 37162]]
parameters listed in section 121.344(a) for which information sources
are installed and which are connected to the recording system, must be
recorded within the ranges, accuracies, resolutions, and sampling
intervals specified in appendix M of this part by [4 years after
effective date of the final rule].
(c) For all turbine-engine-powered airplanes having a passenger
seating configuration, excluding any required crewmember seats, of 10
to 19 seats, that are manufactured after [5 years after effective date
of final rule], the parameters listed in section 121.344(a)(1) through
(a)(88) must be recorded within the ranges, accuracies, resolutions,
and recording intervals specified in appendix M of this part.
(d) Each flight data recorder system required by this section must
be installed in accordance with the requirements of section 23.1459
(a), (b), (d), and (e) of this chapter. A correlation must be
established between the values recorded by the flight data recorder and
the corresponding values being measured. The correlation must contain a
sufficient number of correlation points to accurately establish the
conversion from the recorded values to engineering units or discrete
state over the full operating range of the parameter. A single
correlation may be established for any group of airplanes--
(1) That are of the same type;
(2) On which the flight recorder system and its installation are
the same; and
(3) On which there is no difference in the type design with respect
to the installation of those sensors associated with the flight data
recorder system. Correlation documentation must be maintained by the
certificate holder.
(e) All airplanes subject to this section are also subject to the
requirements and exceptions stated in sections 121.344(g) through
121.344(k).
(f) The following airplane types need not comply with this section,
but must continue to comply with applicable paragraphs of section
135.152 of this chapter, as appropriate: Beech Aircraft--99 Series,
Beech Aircraft 1300, Beech Aircraft 1900C, Construcciones Aeronauticas,
S.A. (CASA) C-212, deHaviland DHC-6, Dornier 228, HS-748, Embraer EMB
110, Jetstream 3101, Jetstream 3201, Fairchild Aircraft SA-226.
4. Appendix M to part 121 is added to read as follows:
Appendix M to Part 121.--Airplane Flight Recorder Specification
[The recorded values must meet the designated range, resolution, and accuracy requirements during dynamic and static conditions. All data recorded must
be correlated in time to within one second]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Accuracy (sensor Seconds per sampling
Parameters Range input) Interval Resolution Remarks
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Time or Relative Time counts... 24 Hrs, 0 to 4095.... +/-0.125% Per Hour... 4.................... 1 sec............... UTC time preferred when
available. Counter
increments each 4
seconds of system
operation.
2. Pressure Altitude.............. -1000 ft to max +/-100 to +/-700 ft 1.................... 5' to 35'........... Data should be obtained
certificated (see table, TSO from the air data
altitude of C124a or TSO C51a). computer when
aircraft. +5000 ft. practicable.
3. Indicated airspeed or 50 KIAS or minimum +/-5% and +/-3%...... 1.................... 1 kt................ Data should be obtained
Calibrated airspeed. value to Max Vso, from the air data
and Vso to 1.2 V.D. computer when
practicable.
4. Heading (Primary flight crew 0-360 deg. and +/-2 deg............. 1.................... 0.5 deg............. When true or magnetic
reference). Discrete ``true'' or heading can be selected
``mag''. as the primary heading
reference, a discrete
indicating selection
must be recorded.
5. Normal Acceleration (Vertical). -3g to +6g........... +/-1% of max range 0.125................ 0.01g.
excluding datum
error of +/-5%.
6. Pitch Altitude................. +/-75 deg............ +/-2 deg............. 1 or 0.25 for 0.5 deg............. A sampling rate of 0.25
airplanes operated is recommended.
under Sec.
121.344(f).
7. Roll Altitude.................. +/-180 deg........... +/-2 deg............. 1 or 0.5 for 0.5 deg............. A sampling rate of 0.5 is
airplanes operated recommended.
under Sec.
121.344(f).
8. Manual Radio Transmitter Keying On-Off (Discrete).... ..................... 1.................... .................... Preferably each crew
or CVR/DFDR synchronization member but one discrete
reference. acceptable for all
transmission provided
the CVR/FDR system
complies with TSO C124a
CVR synchronization
requirements (paragraph
4.2.1 ED-55).
9. Thrust/Power on Each Engine-- Full Range Forward... +/-2%................ 1 (per engine)....... 0.2% of full range.. Sufficient parameters
primary flight crew reference. (e.g. EPR, N1 or Torque,
NP) as appropriate to
the particular engine be
recorded to determine
power in forward and
reverse thrust,
including potential
overspeed conditions.
10. Autopilot Engagement.......... Discrete ``on'' or ..................... 1.
``off''.
[[Page 37163]]
11. Longitudinal Acceleration..... +/-1g................ +/-1.5% max. range 0.25................. 0.01g...............
excluding datum
error of +/-5%.
12a. Pitch Control(s) position Full Range........... +/-2 deg. Unless 0.5 or 0.25 for 0.2% of full range.. For airplanes that have a
(non-fly-by-wire systems. Higher Accuracy airplanes operated flight control break
Uniquely Required. under Sec. away capability that
121.344(f). allows either pilot to
operate the controls
independently, record
both control inputs. The
control inputs may be
sampled alternately once
per second to produce
the sampling interval of
0.5 or 0.25, as
applicable.
12b. Pitch Control(s) position Full Range........... +/-2 deg. Unless 0.5 or 0.25 for 0.2% of full range..
(fly-by-wire systems). Higher Accuracy, airplanes operated
Uniquely Required. under Sec.
121.344(f).
13a. Lateral Control position(s) Full Range........... +/-2 deg. Unless 0.5 or 0.25 for 0.2% of full range.. For airplanes that have a
(non-fly-by-wire). Higher Accuracy airplanes operated flight control break
Uniquely Required. under Sec. away capability that
121.344(f). allows either pilot to
operate the controls
independently, record
both control inputs. The
control inputs may be
sampled alternately once
per second to produce
the sampling interval of
0.5 or 0.25, as
applicable.
13b. Lateral Control positions(s) Full Range........... +/-2 deg. Unless 0.5 or 0.25 for 0.2% of full range. .........................
(fly-by-wire). Higher Accuracy airplanes operated
Uniquely Required. under Sec.
121.344(f).
14a. Yaw Control positions(s) (fly- Full Range........... +/-2 deg. Unless 0.5.................. 0.2% of full range.. For airplanes that have a
by-wire). Higher Accuracy flight control break
Uniquely Required. away capability that
allows either pilot to
operate the controls
independently, record
both control inputs. The
control inputs may be
sampled alternately once
per second to produce
the sampling interval of
0.5.
14b. Yaw Control positions(s) (fly- Full Range........... +/-2 deg. Unless 0.5.................. 0.2% of full range.. .........................
by-wire). Higher Accuracy
Uniquely Required.
15. Pitch Control Surface(s) Full Range........... +/-2 deg. Unless 0.5 or 0.25 for 0.2% of full range.. For airplanes fitted with
Position. Higher Accuracy airplanes operated multiple or split
Uniquely Required. under Sec. surfaces, a suitable
121.344(f). combination of inputs is
acceptable in lieu of
recording each surface
separately. The control
surfaces may be sampled
alternately to produce
the sampling interval of
0.5 or 0.25.
16. Lateral Control Surface(s) Full Range........... +/-2 deg. Unless 0.5 or 0.25 for 0.2% of full range.. A suitable combination of
Position. Higher Accuracy airplanes operated surface position sensors
Uniquely Required. under Sec. is acceptble in lieu of
121.344(f). recording each surface
separately. The control
surfaces may be sampled
alternately to produce
the sampling interval of
0.5 or 0.25.
17. Yaw Control Surface(s)........ Full Range........... +/-2 deg. Unless 0.5.................. 0.2% of full range.. For airplanes with
Higher Accuracy multiple or split
Uniquely Required. surfaces, a suitable
combination of surface
position sensors is
acceptable in lieu of
recording each surface
separately. The control
surfaces may be sampled
alternately to produce
the sampling interval of
0.5.
18. Lateral Acceleration.......... +/-1g................ +/-1.5% max. range 0.25................. 0.01g. .........................
excluding datum
error of +/-5%.
19. Pitch Trim Surface Position... Full Range........... +/-3% Unless Higher 1.................... 0.3% of full range. .........................
Accuracy Uniquely
Required.
[[Page 37164]]
20. Trailing Edge Flap or Cockpit Full Range or Each +/-3 deg. or as 2.................... 0.5% of full range.. Flap positin and cockpit
Control Selection. Position (discrete). Pilot's indicator. control may each be
sampled alternately at 4
second intervals, to
give a data point every
2 seconds.
21. Leading Edge Flap or Cockpit Full Range or Each +/-3 deg. or as 2.................... 0.5% of full range.. Left and right sides, or
Control Selection. Discrete Position. Pilot's indicator flap position and
and sufficient to cockpit control may each
determine each be sampled at 4 second
discrete position.. intervals, so as to give
a data point every 2
seconds.
22. Each Thurst Reverser Position Stowed, In Transit, ..................... 1 (per engine)....... .................... Turbo-jet--2 discretes
(or equivalent for propeller and Reverse enable the 3 states to
airplane). (Discrete). be determined, Turbo--
prop--1 discrete.
23. Ground Spoiler Position or Full Range or Each +/-2 deg. Unless 1 0.5 for airplanes 0.2% of full range.. .........................
Speed Brake Selection. Position (discrete). Higher Accuracy operated under Sec.
Uniquely Required. 121.344(f).
24. Outside Air Temperature or -50 deg.C to +90 +/-2 deg.C........... 2.................... 0.3 deg.C. .........................
Total Air Temperature. deg.C.
25. Autopilot/Autothrottle/AFCS A suitable ..................... 1.................... .................... Discretes should show
Mode and Engagement Status. combination of which systems are
discretes. engaged and which
primary modes are
controlling the flight
path and speed of the
aircraft.
26. Radio Altitude................ -20 ft to 2,500 ft... +/-2 ft or +/-3% 1.................... 1 ft + 5% above 500 For autoland/category 3
Whichever is Greater ft. operations each radio
Below 500 ft and +/- altimeter should be
5% Above 500 ft. recorded, but arranged
so that at least one is
recorded each second.
27. Localizer Deviation or MLS +/-400 Microamps or As installed +/-3% 1.................... 0.3% of full range.. For autoland/category 3
Azimuth. available sensor recommended. operations each system
range as installed, should be recorded but
+/-62 deg.. arranged so that at
least one is recorded
each second. It is not
necessary to record ILS
and MLS at the same
time, only the approach
aid in use need be
recorded.
28. Glideslope Deviation or MLS +/-400 Microamps or As installed +/-3% 1.................... 0.3% of full range.. For autoland/category 3
Elevation. available sensor recommended. operations each system
range as installed, should be recorded but
0.9 to + 30 deg.. arranged so that at
least one is recorded
each second. It is not
necessary to record ILS
and MLS at the same
time, only the approach
aid in use need be
recorded.
29. Marker Beacon Passage......... Discrete ``on'' or ..................... 1.................... .................... A single discrete is
``off''. acceptable for all
makers.
30. Master Warning................ Discrete............. ..................... 1.................... .................... Record the master warning
and record each `red'
warning that cannot be
determined from other
parameters or from the
cockpit voice recorder.
31. Air/ground sensor (primary Discrete ``air'' or ..................... 1 (0.25 recommended).
airplane system reference nose or ``ground''.
main gear).
32. Angle of Attack (If measured As installed......... As Installed......... 2 or 0.5 for 0.3% of full range.. If left and right sensors
directly). airplanes operated are available, each may
under Sec. be recorded at 4 second
121.344(f). intervals so as to give
a data point each half
second.
33. Hydraulic Pressure Low, Each Discrete or available +/-5%................ 2.................... 0.5% of full range.. .........................
System. sensor range,
``low''or ``normal''.
34. Groundspeed................... As Installed......... Most Accurate Systems 1.................... 0.2% of full range. .........................
Installed.
[[Page 37165]]
35. GPWS (ground proximity warning Discrete ``warning'' ..................... 1.................... .................... A suitable combination of
system). or ``off''. discretes unless
recorder capacity is
limited in which case a
single discrete for all
modes is acceptable.
36. Landing Gear Position or Discrete............. ..................... 4.................... .................... A suitable combination of
Landing gear cockpit control discretes should be
selection. recorded.
37. Drift Angle................... As installed......... As installed......... 4.................... 0.1 deg.. .........................
38. Wind Speed and Direction...... As installed......... As installed......... 4.................... 1 knot, and 1.0
deg..
39. Latitude and Longitude........ As installed......... As installed......... 4.................... 0.002 deg........... Provided by the Primary
Navigation System
Reference. Where
capacity permits
Latitude/longitude
resolution should be
0.0002 deg..
40. Stick shaker and pusher Discrete(s) ``on'' or ..................... 1.................... .................... A suitable combination of
activation. ``off''. discretes to determine
activation.
4l. Windshear Detection........... Discrete ``warning'' ..................... 1
or ``off''.
42. Throttle/power lever position. Full Range........... +/-2%................ 1 for each lever..... 2% of full range.... For airplanes with non-
mechanically linked
cockpit engine controls.
43. Additional Engine Parameters.. As installed......... As installed......... Each engine each 2% of full range.... Where capacity permits,
second. the preferred priority
is indicated vibration
level, N2, EGT, Fuel
Flow, Fuel Cut-off lever
position and N3, unless
engine manufacturer
recommends otherwise.
44. Traffic Alert and Collision Discretes............ As installed......... 1.................... .................... A suitable combination of
Avoidance System (TCAS). discretes should be
recorded to determine
the status of--Combined
Control, Vertical
Control, Up Advisory,
and Down Advisory. (ref.
ARINC Characteristic 735
Attachment 6E, TCAS
VERTICAL RA DATA OUTPUT
WORD.)
45. DME 1 and 2 Distance.......... 0-200 NM............. As installed......... 4.................... 1 NM................ 1 mile.
46. Nav 1 and 2 Selected Frequency Full range........... As installed......... 4.................... .................... Sufficient to determine
selected frequency.
47. Selected barometric setting... Full Range........... +/-5%................ (1 per 64 sec.)...... 0.2% of full range.
48. Selected Altitude............. Full Range........... +/-5%................ 1.................... 100 ft.
49. Selected speed................ Full Range........... +/-5%................ 1.................... 1 knot.
50. Selected Mach................. Full Range........... +/-5%................ 1.................... .01.
51. Selected vertical speed....... Full Range........... +/-5%................ 1.................... 100 ft/min.
52. Selected heading.............. Full Range........... +/-5%................ 1.................... 1 deg..
53. Selected flight path.......... Full Range........... +/-5%................ 1.................... 1 deg..
54. Selected decision height...... Full Range........... +/-5%................ 64................... 1 ft.
55. EFIS display format........... Discrete(s).......... ..................... 4.................... Discretes should show the
display system status
(e.g., off, normal,
fail, composite, sector,
plan, nav aids, weather
radar, range, copy.
56. Multi-function/Engine Alerts Discrete(s).......... ..................... 4.................... .................... Discretes should show the
Display format. display system status
(e.g., off, normal,
fail, and the identity
of display pages for
emergency procedures,
need not be recorded.
57. Thrust command................ Full Range........... +/-2%................ 2.................... 2% of full range.
58. Thrust target................. Full Range........... +/-2%................ 4.................... 2% of full range.
59. Fuel quantity in CG trim tank. Full Range........... +/-5%................ (1 per 64 sec.)...... 1% of full range.
[[Page 37166]]
60. Primary Navigation System Discrete GPS, INS, ..................... 4.................... .................... A suitable combination of
Reference. VOR/DME, MLS, Loran discretes to determine
C, Omega, Localizer the Primary Navigation
Glideslope. System reference.
61. Ice Detection................. Discrete ``ice'' or ..................... 4.
``no ice''.
62. Engine warning each engine Discrete............. ..................... 1.
vibration.
63. Engine warning each engine Discrete............. ..................... 1.
over temp.
64. Engine warning each engine oil Discrete............. ..................... 1.
pressure low.
65. Engine warning each engine Discrete............. ..................... 1.
over speed.
66. Yaw Trim Surface Position..... Full Range........... +/-3% Unless Higher 2.................... 0.3% of full range.
Accuracy Uniquely
Required.
67. Roll Trim Surface Position.... Full Range........... +/-3% Unless Higher 2.................... 0.3% of full range.
Accuracy Uniquely
Required.
68. Brake Pressure (left and As installed......... +/-5%................ 1.................... .................... To determine braking
right). effort applied by pilots
or by autobrakes.
69. Brake Pedal Application (left Discrete or Analog +/-5% (Analog)....... 1.................... .................... To determine braking
and right). ``applied'' or applied by pilots.
``off''.
70. Yaw or sideslip angle......... Full Range........... +/-5%................ 1.................... 0.5 deg..
71. Engine bleed valve position... Discrete ``open'' or ..................... 4.
``closed''.
72. De-icing or anti-icing system Discrete ``on'' or ..................... 4.
selection. ``off''.
73. Computed center of gravity.... Full Range........... +/-5%................ (1 per 64 sec.)...... 1% of full range....
74. AC electrical bus status...... Discrete ``power'' or ..................... 4.................... .................... Each bus.
``off''.
75. DC electrical bus status...... Discrete ``power'' or ..................... 4.................... .................... Each bus.
``off''.
76. APU bleed valve position...... Discrete ``open'' or ..................... 4.
``closed''.
77. Hydraulic Pressure (each Full range........... +/-5%................ 2.................... 100 psi.
system).
78. Loss of cabin pressure........ Discrete ``loss'' or ..................... 1.
``normal''.
79. Computer failure (critical Discrete ``fail'' or ..................... 4.
flight and engine control ``normal''.
systems).
80. Heads-up display (when an Discrete(s) ``on'' or ..................... 4. .........................
information source is installed). ``off''.
81. Para-visual display (when an Discrete(s) ``on'' or ..................... 1. .........................
information source is installed). ``off''.
82. Cockpit trim control input Full Range........... +/-5%................ 1.................... 0.2% of full range.. .........................
position--pitch.
[[Page 37167]]
83. Cockpit trim control input Full Range........... +/-5%................ 1.................... 0.2% of full range.. .........................
position--roll.
84. Cockpit trim control input Full Range........... +/-5%................ 1.................... 0.2% of full range.. .........................
position--yaw.
85. Trailing edge flap and cockpit Full Range........... +/-5%................ 2.................... 0.5% of full range.. Trailing edge flaps and
flap control position. cockpit flap control
position may each be
sampled alternately at 4
second intervals to
provide a sample each
0.5 second.
86. Leading edge flap and cockpit Full Range or +/-5%................ 1.................... 0.5% of full range.. .........................
flap control position. Discrete.
87. Ground spoiler position and Full Range or +/-5%................ 0.5.................. 0.2% of full range.. .........................
speed brake selection. Discrete.
88. All cockpit flight control Full Range........... +/-5%................ 1.................... 0.2% of full range.. For fly-by-wire flight
input forces (control wheel, Control wheel........ +/-70 lbs............ control systems, where
control column, rudder pedal). Control Column....... +/-85 lbs............ flight control surface
Rudder pedal......... +/-165 lbs........... position is a function
of the displacement of
the control input device
only, it is not
necessary to record this
parameter.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PART 125 CERTIFICATION AND OPERATIONS: AIRPLANES HAVING A SEATING
CAPACITY OF 20 OR MORE PASSENGERS OR A MAXIMUM PAYLOAD CAPACITY OF
6,000 POUNDS OR MORE
5. The authority citation for part 125 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701-44702, 44705, 44710-
44711, 44713, 44716-44717, 44722.
6. Section 125.226 is added to read as follows:
Sec. 125.226 Digital flight recorders.
(a) Except as provided in paragraph (l) of this section, no person
may operate under this part a turbine-engine-powered transport category
airplane unless it is equipped with one or more approved flight
recorders that use a digital method of recording and storing data and a
method of readily retrieving that data from the storage medium. The
operational parameters required to be recorded by digital flights data
recorders required by this section are as follows; the phrase ``when an
information source is installed'' following a parameter indicates that
recording of that parameters is not intended to require a change in
installed equipment:
(1) Time;
(2) Pressure altitude;
(3) Indicated airspeed;
(4) Heading--primary flight crew reference (if selectable, record
discrete, true or magnetic);
(5) Normal acceleration (Vertical);
(6) Pitch attitude;
(7) Roll attitude;
(8) Manual radio transmitter keying, or CVR/DFDR synchorinization
reference;
(9) Thrust/power of each engine--primary flight crew reference;
(10) Autopilot engagement status:
(11) Longitudinal acceleration;
(12) Pitch control input;
(13) Lateral control input;
(14) Rudder pedal input;
(15) Primary pitch control surface position;
(16) Primary lateral control surface position;
(17) Primary yaw control surface position;
(18) Lateral acceleration;
(19) Pitch trim surface position or the parameters of paragraph
(a)(82) of this section, if currently recorded;
(20) Trailing edge flap or cockpit flap control selection (except
when the parameters of paragraph (a)(85) of this section apply);
(21) Leading edge flap or cockpit flap control selection (except
when the parameters of paragraph (a)(86) of this section apply);
(22) Each Thrust reverser position (or equivalent for propeller
airplane);
(23) Ground spoiler position or speed brake selection (except when
the parameters of paragraph (a)(87) of this section apply);
(24) Outside or total air temperature;
(25) Automatic Flight Control System (AFCS) modes and engagement
status, including autothrottle;
(26) Radio altitude (when an information source is installed);
(27) Localizer deviation, MLS Azimuth;
(28) Glideslope deviation, MLS Elevation;
(29) Maker beacon passage;
(30) Master warning;
(31) Air/ground sensor (primary airplane system reference nose or
main gear);
(32) Angle of attack (when information source is installed);
(33) Hydraulic pressure low (each system);
(34) Ground speed (when an information source is installed);
(35) Ground proximity warning system;
(36) Landing gear position or landing gear cockpit control
selection;
(37) Drift angle (when an information source is installed);
(38) Wind speed and direction (when an information source is
installed);
(39) Latitude and longitude (when an information source is
installed);
(40) Stick shaker/pusher (when an information source is installed);
(41) Windshear (when an information source is installed);
(42) Throttle/power lever position;
(43) Additional engine parameters (as designated in appendix E of
this part);
(44) Traffic alert and collision avoidance system;
[[Page 37168]]
(45) DME 1 and 2 distances;
(46) Nav 1 and 2 selected frequency;
(47) Selected barometric setting (when an information source is
installed);
(48) Selected altitude (when an information source is installed);
(49) Selected speed (when an information source is installed);
(50) Selected mach (when an information source is installed);
(51) Selected vertical speed (when an information source is
installed);
(52) Selected heading (when an information source is installed);
(53) Selected flight path (when an information source is
installed);
(54) Selected decision height (when an information source is
installed);
(55) EFIS display format;
(56) Multi-function/engine/alerts display format;
(57) Thrust command (when an information source is installed);
(58) Thrust target (when an information source is installed);
(59) Fuel quantity in CG trim tank (when an information source is
installed);
(60) Primary Navigation System Reference;
(61) Icing (when an information source is installed);
(62) Engine warning each engine vibration (when an information
source is installed);
(63) Engine warning each engine over temp. (when an information
source is installed);
(64) Engine warning each engine oil pressure low (when an
information source is installed);
(65) Engine warning each engine over speed (when an information
source is installed);
(66) Yaw trim surface position;
(67) Roll trim surface position;
(68) Brake pressure (selected system);
(69) Brake pedal application (left and right);
(70) Yaw or sideslip angle (when an information source is
installed);
(71) Engine bleed valve position (when an information source is
installed);
(72) De-icing or anti-icing system selection (when an information
source is installed);
(73) Computed center of gravity (when an information source is
installed);
(74) AC electrical bus status;
(75) DC electrical bus status;
(76) APU bleed valve position (when an information source is
installed);
(77) Hydraulic pressure (each system);
(78) Loss of cabin pressure;
(79) Computer failure;
(80) Heads-up display (when an information source is installed);
(81) Para-visual display (when an information source is installed);
(82) Cockpit trim control input position--pitch;
(83) Cockpit trim control input position--roll;
(84) Cockpit trim control input position--yaw;
(85) Trailing edge flap and cockpit flap control position;
(86) Leading edge flap and cockpit flap control position;
(87) Ground spoiler position and speed brake selection; and
(88) All cockpit flight control input forces (control wheel,
control column, rudder pedal).
(b) For all turbine-engine powered transport category airplanes
manufactured on or before October 11, 1991, by [four years from
effective date of final rule]--
(1) For airplanes not equipped as of July 15, 1996 with a flight
data acquisition unit (FDAU), the parameters listed in paragraphs
(a)(1) through (a)(18) of this section must be recorded within the
ranges and accuracies specified in appendix D of this part, and--
(i) For airplanes with more than two engines, the parameter
described in paragraph (a)(18) is not required unless sufficient
capacity is available on the existing recorder to record that
parameter;
(ii) Parameters listed in paragraphs (a)(12) through (a)(17) each
may be recorded from a single source.
(2) For airlines that were equipped as of July 15, 1996 with a
flight data acquisition unit (FDAU), the parameters listed in
paragraphs (a)(1) through (a)(22) of this section must be recorded
within the ranges, accuracies, and recording intervals specified in
appendix E of this part. Parameters listed in paragraphs (a)(12)
through (a)(17) each may be recorded from a single source.
(3) The approved flight recorder required by this section must be
installed at the earliest time practicable, but no later than the next
heavy maintenance check after [two years after effective date of final
rule], and no later than [four years after the effective date of the
final rule]. A heavy maintenance check is considered to be any time an
airplane is scheduled to be out of service for 4 or more days and is
scheduled to include access to major structural components.
(c) For all turbine-engine powered transport category airplanes
manufactured on or before October 11, 1991--
(1) That were equipped as of July 15, 1996 with one or more digital
data bus(es) and an ARINC 717 digital flight data acquisition unit
(DFDAU) or equivalent, the parameters specified in paragraphs (a)(1)
through (a)(22) of this section must be recorded within the ranges,
accuracies, resolutions, and sampling intervals specified in appendix E
of this part by [4 years after effective date of the final rule].
Parameters listed in paragraphs (a)(12) through (a)(14) each may be
recorded from a single source.
(2) Commensurate with the capacity of the recording system (DFDAU
or equivalent and the DFDR), all additional parameters for which
information sources are installed and which are connected to the
recording system, must be recorded within the ranges, accuracies,
resolutions, and sampling intervals specified in appendix E of this
part by [4 years after effective date of the final rule].
(3) That were subject to Sec. 125.225(e) of this part, all
conditions of Sec. 125.225(c) must continue to be met until compliance
with paragraph (c)(1) of this section is accomplished.
(d) For all turbine-engine-powered transport category airplanes
that were manufactured after October 11, 1991,--
(1) The parameters listed in paragraph (a)(1) through (a)(34) of
this section must be recorded within the ranges, accuracies,
resolutions, and recording intervals specified in appendix E of this
part by [4 years after effective date of the final rule]. Parameters
listed in paragraphs (a)(12) through (a)(14) each may be recorded from
a single source.
(2) Commensurate with the capacity of the recording system, all
additional parameters for which information sources are installed and
which are connected to the recording system, must be recorded within
the ranges, accuracies, resolutions, and sampling intervals specified
in appendix E of this part by [4 years after effective date of the
final rule].
(e) For all turbine-engine-powered transport category airplanes
that are manufactured after [3 years after effective date of the final
rule]--
(1) The parameters listed in paragraph (a)(1) through (57) of this
section must be recorded within the ranges, accuracies, resolutions,
and recording intervals specified in appendix E of this part.
(2) Commensurate with the capacity of the recording system, all
additional parameters for which information sources are installed and
which are connected to the recording system, must be recorded within
the ranges, accuracies, resolutions, and sampling intervals specified
in appendix E of this part.
[[Page 37169]]
(f) For all turbine-engine-powered transport category airplanes
that are manufactured after [5 years after effective date of final
rule], the parameters listed in paragraphs (a)(1) through (a)(88) of
this section must be recorded within the ranges, accuracies,
resolutions, and recording intervals specified in appendix E of this
part.
(g) Whenever a flight data recorder required by this section is
installed, it must be operated continuously from the instant the
airplane begins its takeoff roll until it has completed its landing
roll.
(h) Except as provided in paragraph (i) of this section, and except
for recorded data erased as authorized in this paragraph, each
certificate holder shall keep the recorded data prescribed by this
section, as appropriate, until the airplane has been operated for at
least 25 hours of the operating time specified in Sec. 121.359(a) of
this part. A total of 1 hour of recorded data may be erased for the
purpose of testing the flight recorder or the flight recorder system.
Any erasure made in accordance with this paragraph must be of the
oldest recorded data accumulated at the time of testing. Except as
provided in paragraph (i) of this section, no record need be kept more
than 60 days.
(i) In the event of an accident or occurence that requires
immediate notification of the National Transportation Safety Board
under 49 CFR part 830 of its regulations and that results in
termination of the flight, the certificate holder shall remove the
recorder from the airplane and keep the recorder data prescribed by
this section, as appropriate, for at least 60 days or for a longer
period upon the request of the Board or the Administrator.
(j) Each flight data recorder system required by this section must
be installed in accordance with the requirements of Sec. 25.1459 (a),
(b), (d), and (e) of this chapter. A correlation must be established
between the values recorded by the flight data recorder and the
corresponding values being measured. The correlation must contain a
sufficient number of correlation points to accurately establish the
conversion from the recorded values to engineering units or discrete
state over the full operating range of the parameter. Except for
airplanes having separate altitude and airspeed sensors that are an
integral part of the flight data recorder system, a single correlation
may be established for any group of airplanes--
(1) That are of the same type;
(2) On which the flight recorder system and its installation are
the same; and
(3) On which there is no difference in the type design with respect
to the installation of those sensors associated with the flight data
recorder system. Documentation sufficient to convert recorded data into
the engineering units and discrete values specified in the applicable
appendix must be maintained by the certificate holder.
(k) Each flight data recorder required by this section must have an
approved device to assist in locating that recorder under water.
(l) The following airplanes need not comply with this section, but
must continue to comply with applicable paragraphs of Sec. 125.225 of
this chapter, as appropriate:
(1) Airplanes that meet the Stage 2 noise levels of part 36 of this
chapter and are subject to Sec. 91.801(c) of this chapter, until
January 1, 2000. On and after January 1, 2000, any Stage 2 airplane
otherwise allowed to be operated under part 91 of this chapter must
comply with the applicable flight data recorder requirements of this
section for that airplane.
(2) General Dynamics Convair 580, General Dynamics Convair 600,
General Dynamics Convair 640, de Havilland Aircraft Company Ltd. DHC-7,
Fairchild Aircraft, Inc., FH 227, Fokker F-27 (except Mark 50), F-28
Mark 1000 and Mark 4000, Gulfstream Aerospace G-159, Lockheed Aircraft
Corporation Electra 10-A, Lockheed Aircraft Corporation Electra 10-B,
Lockheed Aircraft Corporation Electra 10-E, Maryland Air Industries,
Inc. F27, Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. YS-11, Short Bros. Limited
SD3-30, Short Bros. Limited SD3-60.
7. Appendix E to part 125 is added to read as follows:
Appendix E to Part 125.--Airplane Flight Recorder Specification
[The recorded values must meet the designated range, resolution, and accuracy requirements during dynamic and static conditions. All data recorded must
be correlated in time to within one second]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Accuracy (sensor Seconds per Sampling
Parameters Range input) Interval Resolution Remarks
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Time or Relative Time Courts... 24 Hrs 0 to 4095..... +/-0.125% Per Hour... 4.................... 1 sec............... UTC time preferred when
available. Counter
increments each 4
seconds of system
operation.
2. Pressure Altitude.............. -1000 ft to max 1/-100 to +/-700 ft 1.................... 5' to 35'........... Data should be obtained
certificated (see table, TSO from the air data
altitude of C124a or TSO C51A). computer when
aircraft.+5000 ft. practicable.
3. Indicated airspeed or 50 KIAS or minimum +/-5% and/-3%+....... 1.................... 1 kt................ Data should be obtained
Calibrated airspeed. value to Max VSO, from the air data
and VSO to 1.2 V.D. computer when
practicable.
4. Heading (Primary flight crew 0-360 deg. and +/-2 deg............. 1.................... 0.5 deg............. When true or magnetic
reference. Discrete ``true''or heading can be selected
``mag''. as the primary heading
reference, a discrete
indicating selection
must be recorded.
5. Normal Acceleration (Vertical). -3g to +6g........... +/-1% of max range 0.125................ 0.01g. .........................
excluding datum
error of +/-5%.
[[Page 37170]]
6. Pitch Attitude................. +/-75 deg............ +/-2 deg............. 1 or 0.25 for 0.5 deg............. A sampling rate of 0.25
airplanes operated is recommended.
under Sec.
121.344(f).
7. Roll Attitude.................. +/-180 deg........... +/-2 deg............. 1 or 0.5 for 0.5 deg............. A sampling rate of 0.5 is
airplanes operated recommended.
under Sec.
121.344(f).
8. Manual Radio Transmitter Keying On-Off (Discrete) ..................... 1.................... .................... Preferably each crew
or CVR/DFDR synchronization none. member but one discrete
reference. acceptable for all
transmission provided
the CVR/FDR system
complies with TSO C124a
CVR synchronization
requirements (paragraph
4.2.1 ED-55).
9. Thrust/Power on Each Engine-- Full Range Forward... +/-2%................ 1 (per engine)....... 0.2% of full range.. Sufficient parameters
Primary flight crew reference. (e.g. EPR, N1 or Torque,
NP) as appropriate to
the particular engine be
recorded to determine
power in forward and
reverse thrust,
including potential
overspeed conditions.
10. Autopilot Engagement.......... Discrete ``on'' or ..................... 1. .........................
``off''.
11. Longitudinal Acceleration..... +/-1g................ +/-1.5% max. range 0.25................. 0.01g .........................
excluding datum
error of +/-5%.
12a. Pitch Control(s) position Full Range........... +/-2 deg. Unless 0.5 or 0.25 for 0.2% of full range.. For airplanes that have a
(non-fly-by-wire systems. Higher Accuracy airplanes operated flight control break
Uniquely Required. under Sec. away capability that
121.344(f). allows either pilot to
operate the controls
independently, record
both control inputs. The
control inputs may be
sampled alternately once
per second to produce
the sampling interval of
0.5 or 0.25, as
applicable.
12b. Pitch Control(s) position Full Range........... +/-2 deg. Unless 0.5 or 0.25 for 0.2% of full range.. .........................
(fly-by-wire systems). Higher Accuracy airplanes operated
Uniquely Required. under Sec.
121.344(f).
13a. Lateral Control position(s) Full Range........... +/-2 deg. Unless 0.5 or 0.25 for 0.2% of full range.. For airplanes that have a
(non-fly-by-wire). Higher Accuracy airplanes operated flight control break
Uniquely Required. under Sec. away capability that
121.344(f). allows either pilot to
operate the controls
independently, record
both control inputs The
control inputs may be
sampled alternately once
per second to produce
the sampling interval of
0.5 or 0.25, as
applicable.
13b. Lateral Control position(s) Full Range........... +/-2 deg. Unless 0.5 or 0.25 for 0.2% of full range. .........................
(fly-by-wire). Higher Accuracy airplanes operated
Uniquely Required. under Sec.
121.344(f).
14a. Yaw Control position(s) (non- Full Range........... +/-2 deg. Unless 0.5.................. 0.2% of full range.. For airplanes that have a
fly-by-wire). Higher Accuracy flight control break
Uniquely Required. away capability that
allows either pilot to
operate the controls
independently, record
both control inputs. The
control inputs may be
sampled alternately once
per second to produce
the sampling interval of
0.5.
14b. Yaw Control position(s) (fly- Full Range........... +/-2 deg. Unless 0.5.................. 0.2% of full range. .........................
by-wire). Higher Accuracy
Uniquely Required.
[[Page 37171]]
15. Pitch Control Surface(s) Full Range........... +/-2 deg. Unless 0.5 or 0.25 for 0.2% of full range.. For airplanes fitted with
Position. Higher Accuracy airplanes operated multiple or split
Uniquely Required. under Sec. surfaces, a suitable
121.344(f). combination of inputs is
acceptable in lieu of
recording each surface
separately. The control
surfaces may be sampled
alternately to produce
the sampling interval of
0.5 or 0.25.
16. Lateral Control Surface(s) Full Range........... +/-2 deg. Unless 0.5 or 0.25 for 0.2% of full range.. A suitable combination of
Position. Higher Accuracy airplanes operated surface position sensors
Uniquely Required. under Sec. is acceptable in lieu of
121.344(f). recording each surface
separately. The control
surfaces may be sampled
alternately to produce
the sampling interval of
0.5 or 0.25.
17. Yaw Control Surface(s) Full Range........... +/-2 deg. Unless 0.5.................. 0.2% of full range.. For airplanes with
Position. Higher Accuracy multiple or split
Uniquely Required. surfaces, a suitable
combination of surface
position sensors is
acceptable in lieu of
recording each surface
separately. The control
surfaces may be sampled
alternately to produce
the sampling interval of
0.5.
18. Lateral Acceleration.......... +/-1g................ +/-1.5% max. range 0.25................. 0.01g. .........................
excluding datum
error of +/-5%.
19. Pitch Trim Surface Position... Full Range........... +/-3% Unless Higher 1.................... 0.3% of full range. .........................
Accuracy Uniquely
Required..
20. Trailing Edge Flap or Cockpit Full Range or Each +/-3 deg. or as 2.................... 0.5% of full range.. Flap position and cockpit
Control Selection. Position (discrete).. Pilot's indicator. control may each be
sampled alternately at 4
second intervals, to
give a data point every
2 seconds.
21. Leading Edge Flap or Cockpit Full Range or Each +/-3 deg. or as 2.................... 0.5% of full range.. Left and right sides, or
Control Selection. Discrete Position. Pilot's indicator flap position and
and sufficient to cockpit control may each
determine each be sampled at 4 second
discrete position. intervals, so as to give
a data point every 2
seconds.
22. Each Thrust Reverser Position Stowed, In Transit, ..................... 1 (per engine)....... .................... Turbo-jet 2 discretes
(or equivalent for propeller and Reverse enable the 3 states to
airplane). (Discrete).. be determined, Turbo--
prop--1 discrete.
23. Ground Spoiler Position or Full Range or Each +/-2 deg. Unless 1, 0.5 for airplanes 0.2% of full range. .........................
Speed Brake Selection. Position (discrete).. Higher Accuracy operated under Sec.
Uniquely Required. 121.344(f).
24. Outside Air Temperature or -50 deg.C to +90 +/-2 deg. C.......... 2.................... 0.3 deg. C. .........................
Total Air Temperature. deg.C.
25. Autopilot/Autothrottle/AFCS A suitable ..................... 1.................... .................... Discretes should show
Mode and Engagement Status. combination of which systems are
discretes. engaged and which
primary modes are
controlling the flight
path and speed of the
aircraft.
26. Radio Altitude................ -20 ft to 2,500 ft... +/-2 ft or +/-3% 1.................... 1 ft +5% above 500 For autoland/category 3
Whichever is Greater ft. operations. each radio
Below 500 ft and +/- altimeter should be
5% Above 500 ft.. recorded, but arranged
so that at least one is
recorded each second.
27. Localizer Deviation or MLS +/-400 Microamps or As installed +/-3% 1.................... 0.3% of full range.. For autoland/category 3
Azimuth. available sensor recommended. operations. each system
range as installed +/ should be recorded but
-62 deg.. arranged so that at
least one is recorded
each second. It is not
necessary to record ILS
and MLS at the same
time, only the approach
aid in use need be
recorded.
[[Page 37172]]
28. Glideslope Deviation or MLS +/-400 Microamps or As installed +/-3% 1.................... 0.3% of full range.. For autoland/category 3
Elevation. available sensor recommended. operations. each system
range as installed. should be recorded but
0.9 to +30 deg.. arranged so that at
least one is recorded
each second. It is not
necessary to record ILS
and MlS at the same
time, only the approach
aid in use need be
recorded.
29. Marker Beacon Passage......... Discrete ``on'' or ..................... 1.................... .................... A single discrete is
``off''. acceptable for all
markers.
30. Master Warning................ Discrete............. ..................... 1.................... .................... Record the master warning
and record each ``red''
warning that cannot be
determined from other
parameters or from the
cockpit voice recorder.
31. Air/ground sensor (primary Discrete ``air'' or ..................... 1 (0.25 recommended).
airplane system reference nose or ``ground''.
main gear).
32. Angle of Attack (If measured As installed......... As Installed......... 2 or 0.5 for 0.3% of full range.. If left and right sensors
directly). airplanes operated are available, each may
under Sec. be recorded at 4 second
121.344(f). intervals so as to give
a data point each half
second.
33. Hydraulic Pressure Low, Each Discrete or available +/-5%................ 2.................... 0.5% of full range.
System. sensor range,
``low'' or
``normal''.
34. Groundspeed................... As Installed......... Most Accurate Systems 1.................... 0.2% of full range.
Installed.
35. GPWS (ground proximity warning Discrete ``warning'' ..................... 1.................... .................... A suitable combination of
system). or ``off''. discretes unless
recorder capacity is
limited in which case a
singel discrete for all
modes is acceptable.
36. Landing Gear Position or Discrete............. ..................... 4.................... .................... A suitable combination of
Landing gear cockpit control discretes should be
selection. recorded.
37. Drift Angle................... As installed......... As installed......... 4.................... 0.1%.
38. Wind Speed and Direction...... As installed......... As installed......... 4.................... 1 knot, and 1.0.
39. Latitude and Longitude........ As installed......... As installed......... 4.................... 0.002 deg........... Provided by the Primary
Navigation System
Reference. Where
capacity permits
Latitude/longitude
resolution should be
0.0002 deg..
40. Stick shaker and pusher Discrete(s) ``on'' or ..................... 1.................... .................... A suitable combination of
activation. ``off''. discretes to determine
activation.
41. Windshear Detection........... Discrete ``warning'' ..................... 1.
or ``off''.
42. Throttle/power lever position. Full Range........... +/-2%................ 1 for each lever..... 2% of full range.... For airplanes with non-
mechanically linked
cockpit engine controls.
43. Additional Engine Parameters.. As installed......... As installed......... Each engine each 2% of full range.... Where capacity permits,
second. the preferred priority
is indicated vibration
level, N2, EGT, Fuel
Flow, Fuel Cut-off lever
position and N3, unless
engine manufacturer
recommends otherwise.
44. Traffic Alert and Collision Discretes............ As installed......... 1.................... .................... A suitable combination of
Avoidance System (TCAS). discretes should be
recorded to determine
the status of--Combined
Control, Vertical
Control, Up Advisory,
and Down Advisory. (ref.
ARINC Characteristic 735
Attachment 6E, TCAS
VERTICAL RA DATA OUTPUT
WORD.)
45. DME 1 and 2 Distance.......... 0-200 NM;............ As installed......... 4.................... 1 NM................ 1 mile.
46. Nav 1 and 2 Selected Frequency Full range........... As installed......... 4.................... .................... Sufficient to determine
selected frequency.
47. Selected barometric setting... Full Range........... +/-5%................ (1 per 64 sec.) 0.2% of full range..
[[Page 37173]]
48. Selected Altitude............. Full Range........... +/-5%................ 1.................... 100 ft.
49. Selected speed................ Full Range........... +/-5%................ 1.................... 1 knot.
50. Selected Mach................. Full Range........... +/-5%................ 1.................... .01.
51. Selected vertical speed....... Full Range........... +/-5%................ 1.................... 100 ft/min.
52. Selected heading.............. Full Range........... +/-5%................ 1.................... 1 deg..
53. Selected flight path.......... Full Range........... +/-5%................ 1.................... 1 deg..
54. Selected decision height...... Full Range........... +/-5%................ 64................... 1 ft.
55. EFIS display format........... Discrete(s).......... ..................... 4.................... .................... Discretes should show the
display system status
(e.g., off, normal,
fail, composite, sector,
plan, nav aids, weather
radar, range, copy.
56. Multi-function/Engine Alerts Discrete(s).......... ..................... 4.................... .................... Discretes should show the
Display format. display system status
(e.g., off, normal,
fail, and the identity
of display pages for
emergency procedures,
need not be recorded.
57. Thrust command................ Full Range........... +/-2%................ 2.................... 2% of full range.
58. Thrust target................. Full Range........... +/-2%................ 4.................... 2% of full range.
59. Fuel quantity in CG trim tank. Full Range........... +/-5%................ (1 per 64 sec.)...... 1% of full range.
60. Primary Navigation System Discrete GPS, INS, ..................... 4.................... .................... A suitable combination of
Reference. VOR/DME, MLS, Loran Discretes to determine
C, Omega, Localizer the Primary Navigation
Glideslope. System reference.
61. Ice Detection................. Discrete ``ice'' or ..................... 4.
``no ice''.
62. Engine warning each engine Discrete............. ..................... 1.
vibration.
63. Engine warning each engine Discrete............. ..................... 1.
over temp..
64. Engine warning each engine oil Discrete............. ..................... 1.
pressure low.
65. Engine warning each engine Discrete............. ..................... 1.
over speed.
66. Yaw Trim Surface Position..... Full Range........... +/-3% Unless Higher 2.................... 0.3% of full range.
Accuracy Uniquely
Required.
67. Roll Trim Surface Position.... Full Range........... +/-3% Unless Higher 2.................... 0.3% of full range..
Accuracy Uniquely
Required.
68. Brake Pressure (left and As installed......... +/-5%................ 1.................... .................... To determine braking
right). effort applied by pilots
or by autobrakes.
69. Brake Pedal Application (left Discrete or Analog +/-5% (Analog)....... 1.................... .................... To determine braking
and right). ``applied'' or applied by pilots.
``off''.
70. Yaw or sideslip angle......... Full Range........... +/-5%................ 1.................... 0.5 deg.
71. Engine bleed valve position... Discrete ``open'' or ..................... 4.
``closed''.
72. De-icing or anti-icing system Discrete ``on'' or ..................... 4.
selection. ``off''.
73. Computed center of gravity.... Full Range........... +/-5%................ (1 per 64 sec.)...... 1% of full range....
74. AC electrical bus status...... Discrete ``power'' or ..................... 4.................... .................... Each bus.
``off''.
[[Page 37174]]
75. DC electric bus status........ Discrete ``power'' or ..................... 4.................... .................... Each bus.
``off''.
76. APU bleed valve position...... Discrete ``open'' or ..................... 4.
``closed''.
77. Hydraulic Pressure (each Full Range........... +/-5%................ 2.................... 100 psi.
system).
78. Loss of cabin pressure........ Discrete ``loss'' or ..................... 1.
``normal''.
79. Computer failure (critical Discrete ``fail'' or ..................... 4.
flight and engine control ``normal''.
systems).
80. Heads-up display (when an Discrete(s) ``on'' or ..................... 4.
information source is installed). ``off''.
81. Para-visual display (when an Discrete(s) ``on'' or ..................... 1.
information source is installed). ``off''.
82. Cockpit trim control input Full Range........... +/-5%................ 1.................... 0.2% of full range.
position--pitch.
83. Cockpit trim control input Full Range........... +/-5%................ 1.................... 0.2% of full range.
position--roll.
84. Cockpit trim control input Full Range........... +/-5%................ 1.................... 0.2% of full range.
position--yaw.
85. Trailing edge flap and cockpit Full Range........... +/-5%................ 2.................... 0.5% of full range.. Trailing edge flaps and
flap control position. cockpit flap control
position may each be
sampled alternately at 4
second intervals to
provide a sample each
0.5 second.
86. Leading edge flap and cockpit Full Range or +/-5%................ 1.................... 0.5% of full range.
flap control position. Discrete.
87. Ground spoiler position and Full Range or +/-5%................ 0.5.................. 0.2% of full range..
speed brake selection. discrete.
88. All cockpit flight control Full Range........... +/-5%................ 1.................... 0.2% of full range.. For fly-by-wire flight
input forces (control wheel, Control wheel........ +/-70 lbs............ control systems, where
control column, rudder pedal). Control Column....... +/-85 lbs............ flight control surface
Rudder pedal......... +/-165 lbs........... position is a function
of the displacement of
the control input device
only, it is not
necessary to record this
parameter.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PART 129--OPERATIONS: FOREIGN AIR CARRIERS AND FOREIGN OPERATORS OF
U.S.-REGISTERED AIRCRAFT ENGAGED IN COMMON CARRIAGE
8. The authority citation for part 129 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 49 USC 106(g), 40104-40105, 40113, 40119, 44701-
44702, 44712, 44716-44717, 44722, 44901-44904, 44096.
9. In Sec. 129.1, the first sentence of paragraph (b) is revised to
read as follows:
Sec. 129.1 Applicability.
* * * * *
(b) Sections 129.14 and 129.20 also apply to U.S.-registered
aircraft operated in common carriage by a foreign person or foreign air
carrier solely outside the United States. * * *
10. Section 129.20 is added to read as follows:
Sec. 129.20 Digital flight data recorders.
No person may operate an aircraft under this part that is
registered in the United States unless it is equipped with one or more
approved flight recorders that use a digital method of recording and
storing data and a method of readily retrieving that data from the
storage medium. The flight data recorder must record the parameters
that would be required to be recorded if the aircraft were operated
under parts 121 or 135 of this chapter, and must be installed by the
compliance times required by those parts, as applicable to the
aircraft.
PART 135 AIR--TAXI OPERATORS AND COMMERCIAL OPERATORS
11. The authority citation for part 135 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 49 USC 106(g), 40113, 44701-44702, 44705, 44709,
44711-44713, 44715-44717, 44722.
12. Section 135.152 is revised to read as follows:
[[Page 37175]]
Sec. 135.152 Flight recorders.
* * * * *
(f) (1) For airplanes manufactured on or before [3 years after
effective date of final rule], and all other aircraft, each flight
recorder required by this section must be installed in accordance with
the requirements of Sec. 23.1459, 25.1459, 27.1459, or 29.1459, as
appropriate, of this chapter. The correlation required by paragraph (c)
of Secs. 23.1459, 25.1459, 27.1459, or 29.1459, as appropriate, of this
chapter need be established only on one aircraft of a group of
aircraft:
(i) That are of the same type;
(ii) On which the flight recorder models and their installations
are the same; and
(iii) On which there are no differences in the type design with
respect to the installation of the first pilot's instruments associated
with the flight recorder. The most recent instrument calibration,
including the recording medium from which this calibration is derived,
and the recorder correlation must be retained by the certificate
holder.
(f) (2) For airplanes manufactured after [3 years after effective
date of final rule], each flight data recorder system required by this
section must be installed in accordance with the requirements of
Sec. 23.1459 (a), (b), (d), and (e) of this chapter, or Sec. 25.1459
(a), (b), (d), and (e) of this chapter. A correlation must be
established between the values recorded by the flight data recorder and
the corresponding values being measured. The correlation must contain a
sufficient number of correlation points to accurately establish the
conversion from the recorded values to engineering units or discrete
state over the full operating range of the parameter. Except for
airplanes having separate altitude and airspeed sensors that are an
integral part of the flight data recorder system, a single correlation
may be established for any group of airplanes--
(i) That are of the same type;
(ii) On which the flight recorder system and its installation are
the same; and
(iii) On which there is no difference in the type design with
respect to the installation of those sensors associated with the flight
data recorder system. Documentation sufficient to convert recorded data
into the engineering units and discrete values specified in the
applicable appendix must be maintained by the certificate holder.
* * * * *
13. In Sec. 135.152, new paragraphs (h), (i), and (j) are added to
read as follows:
* * * * *
(h) The operational parameters required to be recorded by digital
flight data recorders required by paragraphs (i) and (j) of this
section are as follows; the phrase ``when an information source is
installed'' following a parameter indicates that recording of that
parameter is not intended to require a change in installed equipment:
(1) Time;
(2) Pressure altitude;
(3) Indicated airspeed;
(4) Heading--primary flight crew reference (if selectable, record
discrete, true or magnetic);
(5) Normal acceleration (Vertical);
(6) Pitch attitude;
(7) Roll attitude;
(8) Manual radio transmitter keying, or CVR/DFDR synchronization
reference;
(9) Thrust/power of each engine--primary flight crew reference;
(10) Autopilot engagement status;
(11) Longitudinal acceleration;
(12) Pitch control input;
(13) Lateral control input;
(14) Rudder pedal input;
(15) Primary pitch control surface position;
(16) Primary lateral control surface position;
(17) Primary yaw control surface position;
(18) Lateral acceleration;
(19) Pitch trim surface position or the parameters of paragraph
(h)(82) of this section, if currently recorded;
(20) Trailing edge flap or cockpit flap control selection (except
when the parameters of paragraph (h)(85) of this section apply);
(21) Leading edge flap or cockpit flap control selection (except
when the parameters of paragraph (h)(86) of this section apply);
(22) Each Thrust reverser position (or equivalent for propeller
airplane);
(23) Ground spoiler position or speed brake selection (except when
the parameters of paragraph (h)(87) of this section apply);
(24) Outside or total air temperature;
(25) Automatic Flight Control system (AFCS) modes and engagement
status, including autothrottle;
(26) Radio altitude (when an information source is installed);
(27) Localizer deviation, MLS Azimuth;
(28) Glideslope deviation, MLS Elevation;
(29) Market beacon passage;
(30) Master warning;
(31) Air/ground sensor (primary airplane system reference nose or
main gear);
(32) Angle of attack (when information source is installed);
(33) Hydraulic pressure low (each system);
(34) Ground speed (when an information source is installed);
(35) Ground proximity warning system;
(36) Landing gear position or landing gear cockpit control
selection;
(37) Drift angle (when an information source is installed);
(38) Wind speed and direction (when an information source is
installed);
(39) Latitude and longitude (when an information source is
installed);
(40) Stick shaker/pusher (when an information source is installed);
(41) Windshear (when an information source is installed);
(42) Throttle/power lever position;
(43) Additional engine parameters (as designated in appendix F of
this part);
(44) Traffic alert and collision avoidance system;
(45) DME 1 and 2 distances;
(46) Nav 1 and 2 selected frequency;
(47) Selected barometric setting (when an information source is
installed);
(48) Selected altitude (when an information source is installed);
(49) Selected speed (when an information source is installed);
(50) Selected mach (when an information source is installed);
(51) Selected vertical speed (when an information source is
installed);
(52) Selected heading (when an information source is installed);
(53) Selected flight path (when an information source is
installed);
(54) Selected decision height (when an information source is
installed);
(55) EFIS display format;
(56) Multi-function/engine/alerts display format;
(57) Thrust command (when an information source is installed);
(58) Thrust target (when an information source is installed);
(59) Fuel quantity in CG trim tank (when an information source is
installed);
(60) Primary Navigation System Reference;
(61) Icing (when an information source is installed);
(62) Engine warning each engine vibration (when an information
source is installed);
(63) Engine warning each engine over temp. (when an information
source is installed);
(64) Engine warning each engine oil pressure low (when an
information source is installed);
(65) Engine warning each engine over speed (when an information
source is installed);
(66) Yaw trim surface position;
(67) Roll trim surface position;
[[Page 37176]]
(68) Brake pressure (selected system);
(69) Brake pedal application (left and right);
(70) Yaw or sideslip angle (when an information source is
installed);
(71) Engine bleed valve position (when an information source is
installed);
(72) De-icing or anti-icing system selection (when an information
source is installed);
(73) Computed center of gravity (when an information source is
installed);
(74) AC electrical bus status;
(75) DC electrical bus status;
(76) APU bleed valve position (when an information source is
installed);
(77) Hydraulic pressure (each system);
(78) Loss of cabin pressure;
(79) Computer failure;
(80) Heads-up display (when an information source is installed);
(81) Para-visual display (when an information source is installed);
(82) Cockpit trim control input position--pitch;
(83) Cockpit trim control input position--roll;
(84) Cockpit trim control input position--yaw;
(85) Trailing edge flap and cockpit flap control position;
(86) Leading edge flap and cockpit flap control position;
(87) Ground spoiler position and speed brake selection; and
(88) All cockpit flight control input forces (control wheel,
control column, rudder pedal).
(i) For all turbine-engine-powered airplanes with a seating
configuration, excluding any required crewmember seat, of 10 to 30
passenger seats, manufactured after [3 years after effective date of
the final rule]--
(1) The parameters listed in paragraphs (h)(1) through (h)(57) of
this section must be recorded within the ranges, accuracies,
resolutions, and recording intervals specified in appendix F of this
part.
(2) Commensurate with the capacity of the recording system, all
additional parameters for which information sources are installed and
which are connected to the recording system, must be recorded within
the ranges, accuracies, resolutions, and sampling intervals specified
in appendix F of this part.
(j) For all turbine-engine-powered airplanes with a seating
configuration, excluding any required crewmember seat, of 10 to 30
passenger seats, that are manufactured after [5 years after effective
date of final rule], the parameters listed in paragraph (a)(1) through
(a)(88) of this section must be recorded within the ranges, accuracies,
resolutions, and recording intervals specified in appendix F of this
part.
14. Appendix F to part 135 is added to read as follows:
Appendix F to Part 135.--Airplane Flight Recorder Specification
[The recorded values must meet the designated range, resolution, and accuracy requirements during dynamic and static conditions. All data recorded must
be correlated in time to within one second]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Accuracy (sensor Seconds per sampling
Parameters Range input) Interval Resolution Remarks
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Time or Relative Time Counts... 24 Hrs 0 to 4095..... +/-0.125 Per Hour.... 4.................... 1 sec............... UTC time preferred when
available. Counter
increments each 4
seconds of system
operation.
2. Pressure Altitude.............. -1000 ft to max +/-100 to +/-700 ft 1.................... 5' to 35'........... Data should be obtained
certificated (see table, TSO from the air data
altitude of C124a or TSO C51a). computer when
aircraft.+5000 ft. practicable.
3. Indicated airspeed or 50 KIAS or minimum +/-5% and +/-3%...... 1.................... 1 kt................ Data should be obtained
Calibrated airspeed. value to Max Vso and from the air data
Vso to 1.2 V.D. computer when
practicable.
4. Heading (Primary flight crew 0-360 deg. and +/-2 deg............. 1.................... 0.5 deg............. When true or magnetic
reference). Discrete ``true'' or heading can be selected
``mag''. as the primary heading
reference, a discrete
indicating selection
must be recorded.
5. Normal Acceleration (Vertical). -3g to +6g........... +/--1% of max range 0.125................ 0.01g .........................
excluding datum
error of +/-5%.
6. Pitch Attitude................. +/-75 deg............ +/-2 deg............. 1 or 0.25 for 0.5 deg............. A sampling rate of 0.25
airplanes operated is recommended.
under Sec.
121.344(f).
7. Roll Attitude.................. +/-180 deg........... +/-2 deg............. 1 or 0.5 for 0.5 deg............. A sampling rate of 0.5 is
airplanes operated recommended.
under Sec.
121.344(f).
8. Manual Radio Transmitter Keying On-Off (Discrete).... ..................... 1.................... .................... Preferably each crew
or CVR/DFDR synchronization member but one discrete
reference. acceptable for all
transmission provided
the CVR/FDR system
complies with TSO C124a
CVR synchronization
requirements (paragraph
4.2.1 ED-55).
9. Thrust/Power on Each Engine-- Full Range Forward... +/-2%................ 1 (per engine)....... 0.2% of full range.. Sufficient parameters
primary flight crew reference. (e.g. EPR, N1 or Torque,
NP) as appropriate to
the particular engine be
recorded to determine
power in forward and
reverse thrust,
including potential
overspeed conditions.
[[Page 37177]]
10. Autopilot Engagement.......... Discrete ``on'' or ..................... 1. .........................
``off''.
11. Longitudinal Acceleration..... +/-1g................ +/-1.5% max. range 0.25................. 0.01g............... .........................
excluding datum
error of +/-5%.
12a. Pitch Control(s) position Full Range........... +/-2 deg. Unless 0.5 or 0.25 for 0.2% of full range.. For airplanes that have a
(non-fly-wire systems. Higher Accuracy airplanes operated flight control break
Uniquely Required. under Sec. away capability that
121.344(f). allows either pilot to
operate the controls
independently, record
both control inputs. The
control inputs may be
sampled alternately once
per second to produce
the sampling interval of
0.5 or 0.25, as
applicable.
12b. Pitch Control(s) position Full Range........... +/-2 deg. Unless 0.5 or 0.25 for 0.2% of full range.. .........................
(fly-by-wire systems). Higher Accuracy airplanes operated
Uniquely Required. under Sec.
121.344(f).
13a. Lateral Control position(s) Full Range........... +/-2 deg. Unless 0.5 or 0.25 for 0.2% of full range.. For airplanes that have a
(non-fly-by-wire). Higher Accuracy airplanes operated flight control break
Uniquely Required. under Sec. away capability that
121.344(f). allows either pilot to
operate the controls
independently, record
both control inputs. The
control inputs may be
sampled alternately once
per second to produce
the sampling interval of
0.5 or 0.25, as
applicable.
13b. Lateral Control position(s) Full Range........... +/-2 deg. Unless 0.5 or 0.25 for 0.2% of full range.
(fly-by-wire). Higher Accuracy airplanes operated
Uniquely Required. under Sec.
121.344(f).
14a. Yaw Control Position(s) (non- Full Range........... +/-2 deg. Unless 0.5.................. 0.2% of full range.. For airplanes that have a
fly-by-wire). Higher Accuracy flight control break
Uniquely Required. away capability that
allows either pilot to
operate the controls
independently, record
both control inputs. The
control inputs may be
sampled alternately once
per second to produce
the sampling interval of
0.5.
14b. Yaw Control Position(s) (fly- Full Range........... +/-2 deg. Unless 0.5.................. 0.2% of full range.
by-wire). Higher Accuracy
Uniquely Required.
15. Pitch Control Surface(s) Full Range........... +/-2 deg. Unless 0.5 or 0.25 for 0.2% of full range.. For airplanes fitted with
Position. Higher Accuracy airplanes operated multiple or split
Uniquely Required. under Sec. surfaces, a suitable
121.344(f). combination of inputs is
acceptable in lieu of
recording each surface
separately. The control
surfaces may be sampled
alternately to produce
the sampling interval of
0.5 or 0.25.
16. Lateral Control Surface(s) Full Range........... +/-2 deg. Unless 0.5 or 0.25 for 0.2% of full range.. A suitable combination of
Position. Higher Accuracy airplanes operated surface position sensors
Uniquely Required. under Sec. is acceptable in lieu of
121.344(f). recording each surface
separately. The control
surfaces may be sampled
alternately to produce
the sampling interval of
0.5 or 0.25.
17. Yaw Control Surface(s) Full Range........... +/-2 deg. Unless 0.5.................. 0.2% of full range.. For airplanes with
Position. Higher Accuracy multiple or split
Uniquely Required. surfaces, a suitable
combination of surface
position sensors is
acceptable in lieu of
recording each surface
separately. The control
surfaces may be sampled
alternately to produce
the sampling interval of
0.5
18. Lateral Acceleration.......... +/-1g................ +/-1.5% max. range 0.25................. 0.01g.
excluding datum
error of +/-5%.
[[Page 37178]]
19. Pitch Trim Surface Position... Full Range........... +/-3% Unless Higher 1.................... 0.3% of full range.
Accuracy Uniquely
Required.
20. Trailing Edge Flap or Cockpit Full Range or Each +/-3 deg. or as 2.................... 0.5% of full range.. Flap position and cockpit
Control Selection. Position (discrete). Pilot's indicator. control may each be
sampled alternately at 4
second intervals, to
give a data point every
2 seconds.
21. Leading Edge Flap or Cockpit Full Range or Each +/-3 deg. or as 2.................... 0.5% of full range.. Left and right sides, or
Control Selection. Discrete Position. Pilot's indicator flap position and
and sufficient to cockpit control may each
determine each be sampled at 4 second
discrete position. intervals, so as to give
a data point every 2
seconds.
22. Each Thrust Reverser Position Stowed, In Transit, ..................... 1 (per engine)....... .................... Turbo-jet--2 discretes
(or equivalent for propeller and Reverse enable the 3 states to
airplane). (Discrete).. be determined Turbo-prop-
1 discrete.
23. Ground Spoiler Position or Full Range or Each +/-2 deg. Unless 1 or 0.5 for 0.2% of full range.
Speed Brake Selection. Position (discrete). Higher Accuracy airplanes operated
Uniquely Required. under Sec.
121.344(f).
24. Outside Air Temperature or -50 deg.C to +90 +/-2 deg. C.......... 2.................... 0.3 deg. C.
Total Air Temperature. deg.C.
25. Autopilot/Autothrottle/AFCS A suitable ..................... 1.................... .................... Discretes should show
Mode and Engagement Status. combination of which systems are
discretes. engaged and which
primary modes are
controlling the flight
path and speed of the
aircraft.
26. Radio Altitude................ -20 ft to 2,500 ft... +/-2 ft or +/-3% 1.................... 1 ft 5% above 500 ft For autoland/category 3
Whichever is Greater of full range. operations, each radio
Below 500 ft and +/- altimeter should be
5% Above 500 ft. recorded, but arranged
so that at least one is
recorded each second.
27. Localizer Deviation or MLS +/-400 Microamps or As installed +/-3% 1.................... 0.3% of full range.. For autoland/category 3
Azimuth. available sensor recommended. operations, each system
range as installed +/ should be recorded but
-62 deg.. arranged so that at
least one is recorded
each second. It is not
necessary to record ILS
and MLS at the same
time, only the approach
aid in use need to be
recorded.
28. Glideslope Deviation or MLS +/-400 Microamps or As installed +/-3% 1.................... 0.3% of full range.. For autoland/category 3
Elevation. available sensor recommended. operations, each system
range as installed. should be recorded but
0.9 to + 30 deg.. arranged so that at
least one is recorded
each second. It is not
necessary to record ILS
and MLS at the same
time, only the approach
aid in use need to be
recorded.
29. Marker Beacon Passage......... Discrete ``on'' or ..................... 1.................... .................... A single discrete is
``off''. acceptable for all
markers.
30. Master Warning................ Discrete............. ..................... 1.................... .................... Record the master warning
and record each `red'
warning that cannot be
determined from other
parameters or from the
cockpit voice recorder.
31. Air/ground sensor (primary Discrete ``air'' or ..................... 1 (0.25 recommended).
airplane system reference nose or ``ground''.
main gear).
32. Angle of Attack (If measured As installed......... As Installed......... 2 or 0.5 for 0.3% of full range.. If left and right sensors
directly). airplanes operated are available, each may
under Sec. be recorded at 4 second
121.344(f). intervals so as to give
a data point each half
second.
33. Hydraulic Pressure Low, Each Discrete or available +/- 5%............... 2.................... 0.5% of full range.
System. sensor range,
``low'' or
``normal''.
[[Page 37179]]
34. Groundspeed................... As Installed......... Most Accurate Systems 1.................... 0.2% of full range.
Installed.
35. GPWS (ground proximity warning Discrete ``warning'' ..................... 1.................... .................... A suitable combination of
system). or ``off''. discretes unless
recorder capacity is
limited in which case a
single discrete for all
modes is acceptable.
36. Landing Gear Position or Discrete............. ..................... 4.................... .................... A suitable combination of
Landing gear cockpit control discretes should be
selection. recorded.
37. Drift Angle................... As installed......... As installed......... 4.................... 0.1 deg..
38. Wind Speed and Direction...... As installed......... As installed......... 4.................... 1 knot, and 1.0
deg..
39. Latitude and Longitude........ As installed......... As installed......... 4.................... 0.002 deg........... Provided by the Primary
Navigation System
Reference. Where
capacity permits
Latitude/longitude
resolution should be
0.0002 deg..
40. Stick shaker and pusher Discrete(s) ``on'' or ..................... 1.................... .................... A suitable combination of
activation. ``off''. discretes to determine
activation.
41. Windshear Detection........... Discrete ``warning'' ..................... 1. .........................
or ``off''.
42. Throttle/power lever position. Full Range........... +/- 2%............... 1 for each lever..... 2% of full range.... For airplanes with non-
mechanically linked
cockpit engine controls.
43. Additional Engine Parameters.. As installed......... As installed......... Each engine each 2% of full range.... Where capacity permits,
second. the preferred priority
is indicated vibration
level, N2, EGT, Fuel
Flow, Fuel Cut-off lever
position and N3, unless
engine manufacturer
recommends otherwise.
44. Traffic Alert and Collision Discretes............ As installed......... 1.................... .................... A suitable combination of
Avoidance System (TCAS). discretes should be
recorded to determine
the status of--Combined
Control, Vertical
Control, Up Advisory,
and Down Advisory. (ref.
ARINC Characteristic 735
Attachment 6E, TCAS
VERTICAL RA DATA OUTPUT
WORD.)
45. DME 1 and 2 Distance.......... 0-200 NM;............ As installed......... 4.................... 1 NM................ 1 mile.
46. Nav 1 and 2 Selected Frequency Full range........... As installed......... 4.................... .................... Sufficient to determine
selected frequency.
47. Selected barometric setting... Full Range........... +/- 5%............... (1 per 64 sec.)...... 0.2% of full range.
48. Selected Altitude............. Full Range........... +/- 5%............... 1.................... 100 ft.
49. Selected speed................ Full Range........... +/- 5%............... 1.................... 1 knot.
50. Selected Mach................. Full Range........... +/- 5%............... 1.................... .01.
51. Selected vertical speed....... Full Range........... +/- 5%............... 1.................... 100 ft/min.
52. Selected heading.............. Full Range........... +/- 5%............... 1.................... 1 deg...............
53. Selected flight path.......... Full Range........... +/-5%................ 1.................... 1 deg..
54. Selected decision height...... Full Range........... +/- 5%............... 64................... 1 ft.
55. EFIS display format........... Discrete(s).......... ..................... 4.................... .................... Discretes should show the
display system status
(e.g., off, normal,
fail, composite, sector,
plan, nav aids, weather
radar, range, copy.
56. Multi-function/Engine Alerts Discrete(s).......... ..................... 4.................... .................... Discretes should show the
Display format. display system status
(e.g., off, normal,
fail, and the identity
of display pages for
emergency procedures,
need not be recorded.
57. Thrust command................ Full Range........... +/- 2%............... 2.................... 2% of full range.
58. Thrust target................. Full Range........... +/-2%................ 4.................... 2% of full range. .........................
59. Fuel quantity in CG trim tank. Full Range........... +/-5%................ (1 per 64 sec.)...... 1% of full range. .........................
[[Page 37180]]
60. Primary Navigation System Discrete GPS, INS, ..................... 4.................... .................... A suitable combination of
Reference. VOR/DME, MLS, Loran discretes to determine
C, Omega, Localizer the Primary Navigation
Glideslope. System Reference.
61. Ice Detection................. Discrete ``ice'' or ..................... 4. .........................
``no ice''.
62. Engine warning each engine Discrete............. ..................... 1. .........................
vibration.
63. Engine warning each engine Discrete............. ..................... 1. .........................
over temp.
64. Engine warning each engine oil Discrete............. ..................... 1.
pressure low.
65. Engine warning each engine Discrete............. ..................... 1.
over speed.
66. Yaw Trim Surface Position..... Full Range........... +/-3% Unless Higher 2.................... 0.3% of full range.. .........................
Accuracy Uniquely
Required.
67. Roll Trim Surface Position.... Full Range........... +/-3% Unless Higher 2.................... 0.3% of full range.. .........................
Accuracy Uniquely
Required.
68. Brake Pressure (left and As installed......... +/-5%................ 1.................... .................... To determine braking
right). effort applied by pilots
or by autobrakes.
69. Brake Pedal Application (left Discrete or Analog +/-5% (Analog)....... 4.................... .................... To determine braking
and right). ``applied'' or applied by pilots.
``off''.
70. Yaw or sideslip angle......... Full Range........... +/-5%................ 1.................... 0.5 deg.. .........................
71. Engine bleed valve position... Discrete ``open'' or ..................... 4. .........................
``closed''.
72. Deicing or anti-icing system Discrete ``on'' or ..................... 4. .........................
selection. ``off''.
73. Computed center of gravity.... Full Range........... +/-5%................ (1 per 64 sec.)...... 1% of full range. .........................
74. AC electrical bus status...... Discrete ``power'' or ..................... 4.................... .................... Each bus.
``off''.
75. DC electrical bus status...... Discrete ``power'' or ..................... 4.................... .................... Each bus.
``off''.
76. APU bleed valve position...... Discrete ``open'' or ..................... 4. .........................
``closed''.
77. Hydraulic Pressure (each Full range........... +/-5%................ 2.................... 100 psi. .........................
system).
78. Loss of cabin pressure........ Discrete ``loss'' or ..................... 1.
``normal''.
79. Computer failure (critical Discrete ``fail'' or ..................... 4
flight and engine control ``normal''.
systems).
80. Heads-up display (when an Discrete(s) ``on'' or ..................... 4.
information source is installed). ``off''.
81. Para-visual display (when an Discrete(s) ``on'' or ..................... 1.
information source is installed). ``off''.
82. Cockpit trim control input Full Range........... +/-5%................ 1.................... 0.2% of full range.. .........................
position--pitch.
[[Page 37181]]
83. Cockpit trim control input Full Range........... +/-5%................ 1.................... 0.2% of full range.. .........................
position--roll.
84. Cockpit trim control input Full Range........... +/-5%................ 1.................... 0.2% of full range.. .........................
position--yaw.
85. Trailing edge flap and cockpit Full Range........... +/-5%................ 2.................... 0.5% of full range.. Trailing edge flaps and
flap control position. cockpit flap control
position may each be
sampled alternately at 4
second intervals to
provide a sample each
0.5 second.
86. Leading edge flap and cockpit Full Range or +/-5%................ 1.................... 0.5% of full range.. .........................
flap control position. Discrete.
87. Ground spoiler position and Full Range or +/-5%................ 0.5.................. 0.2% of full range. .........................
speed brake selection. discrete.
88. All cockpit flight control Full Range........... +/-5%................ 1.................... 0.2% of full range.. For fly-by-wire flight
input forces (control wheel, Control wheel........ +/-70 lbs. control systems, where
control column, rudder pedal). Control Column....... +/-85 lbs. flight control surface
Rudder pedal......... +/-165 lbs. position is a function
of the displacement of
the control input device
only, it is not
necessary to record this
parameter.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Issued in Washington, DC, on July 9, 1996.
Ava L. Robinson,
Special Assistant to the Director, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 96-17824 Filed 7-10-96; 3:17 pm]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M