98-18962. Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice of Filing and Order Granting Accelerated Approval of Proposed Rule Change by the American Stock Exchange, Inc. Relating to Minimum Trading Increments (Rule 127)  

  • [Federal Register Volume 63, Number 136 (Thursday, July 16, 1998)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 38439-38441]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 98-18962]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
    
    [Release No. 34-40189; File No. SR-AMEX-97-39]
    
    
    Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice of Filing and Order 
    Granting Accelerated Approval of Proposed Rule Change by the American 
    Stock Exchange, Inc. Relating to Minimum Trading Increments (Rule 127)
    
    July 10, 1998.
        Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
    (``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that 
    on October 22, 1997, the American Stock Exchange, Inc. (``Amex'' or 
    ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities Exchange Commission (``SEC'' or 
    ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and II 
    below, which Items have been prepared by the self-regulatory 
    organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit 
    comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons and to 
    grant accelerated approval to the proposed rule chage.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
        \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of 
    Substance of the Proposed Rule Change
    
        The Amex proposes to amend Exchange Rule 127 to add Commentary .03 
    to permit members to trade on the Exchange in increments smaller than 
    \1/16\ in order to match bids and offers displayed in other markets for 
    the purpose of preventing Intermarket Trading System (``ITS'') trade-
    throughs. The text of the proposed rule change is available at the 
    Office of the Secretary, the Amex and at the Commission.
    
    II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
    Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
    
        In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization 
    included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the 
    proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the 
    proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at 
    the places specified in Item IV below. The self-regulatory organization 
    has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of the 
    most significant aspect of such statements.
    
    A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
    Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
    
    1. Purpose
        Amex Rule 127 currently provides that the minimum fractional change 
    for transactions on the Exchange is \1/16\ for securities selling above 
    \1/4\, and \1/32\ for securities selling below \1/4\. In May 1997, the 
    Exchange extended trading in sixteenths to all Amex equity securities 
    selling at $10 or higher, having previously only traded securities 
    priced under $10 in sixteenths. The Exchange took this step based on 
    its belief that trading in increments of \1/16\ promotes investor 
    protection by enhancing price improvement opportunities on the 
    Exchange.
        Since Amex's initiative and subsequent initiatives by other markets 
    to implement sixteenths trading, certain third market makers have 
    disseminated quotations in a limited number of listed securities in 
    fractions smaller than a sixteenth. In addition, ITS has been modified 
    to permit commitments to trade to be sent through ITS in fractions as 
    small as \1/64\. This ITS modification permits Amex members to send 
    orders
    
    [[Page 38440]]
    
    via ITS to a market displaying a quotation in \1/32\ or \1/64\.
        The Exchange believes it is important to provide its members with 
    flexibility to effect transactions on the Exchange at a smaller 
    increment than \1/16\ for the purpose of matching a displayed bid or 
    offer in another market at such smaller increment (i.e., \1/32\ or \1/
    64\) for the purpose of preventing ITS trade-thoughs.\3\ For example, 
    if the best bid on the Amex is 8 and a bid of 8\1/32\ is displayed 
    through ITS in another market center, the Amex specialist or floor 
    broker may execute a market or marketable limit order at 8\1/32\ in 
    order to match the other market's bid. Amex will retain its existing 
    requirement that limit orders can only be entered increments no smaller 
    than \1/16\.\4\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \3\ See Amex Rule 236.
        \4\ But see Amex Rule 127, Commentary .01, which provides that 
    Standard & Poor's Depositary Receipts and MidCap SPDRs 
    TM may trade on the Exchange in increments as small as 
    \1/64\ of one dollar.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    2. Statutory Basis
        The basis under the Act for the proposed rule change is the 
    requirement under Section 6(b)(5) \5\ that an Exchange have rules that 
    are designed to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to 
    remove impediments to, and perfect the mechanism of a free and open 
    market and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
    
        The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will 
    impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate 
    in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
    
    C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
    Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others
    
        No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the 
    proposed rule change.
    
    III. Commission's Findings and Order Granting Accelerated Approval 
    of the Proposed Rule Change
    
        The Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent 
    with the requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations 
    thereunder applicable to a national securities exchange, and, in 
    particular, with the requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act.\6\ 
    Specifically, the Commission believes the proposal is consistent with 
    the Section 6(b)(5) \7\ requirements that the rules of an exchange be 
    designed to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to prevent 
    fraudulent and manipulative acts, and, in general, to protect investors 
    and the public.\8\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
        \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
        \8\ In approving this rule change, the Commission has considered 
    the proposed rules' impact on efficiency, competition, and capital 
    formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        Recently, there has been a movement within the industry to reduce 
    the minimum trading and quotation increments imposed by the various 
    self-regulatory organizations (``SROs''). Last year, the Amex, Nasdaq 
    Stock Market (``Nasdaq''), New York Stock Exchange (``NYSE'') and 
    Chicago Board Options Exchange (``CBOE'') reduced their minimum 
    increments.\9\ Currently, exchange rules provide for trading of most 
    equity securities in increments as small as \1/16\ of a dollar.\10\ 
    Amex represents that several third market makers have begun quoting 
    securities in increments smaller than those approved for trading on the 
    primary markets. The proposed rule change will provide Amex with the 
    limited flexibility it needs to address this development and remain 
    competitive with these markets.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \9\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 38571 (May 5, 1997), 62 
    FR 25682 (May 9, 1997) (approving an Amex proposal to reduce the 
    minimum trading increment to \1/16\ for certain Amex-listed equity 
    securities); Securities Exchange Act Release No. 38678 (May 27, 
    1997), 62 FR 30363 (June 6, 1997) (approving a Nasdaq rule change to 
    reduce the minimum quotation increment to \1/16\ for certain Nasdaq-
    listed securities); Securities Exchange Act Release No. 38897 (Aug. 
    1, 1997), 62 FR 42847 (Aug. 8, 1997) (approving a NYSE rule change 
    to reduce the minimum quotation increment to \1/16\ for certain 
    NYSE-listed securities) and Securities Exchange Act Release No. 
    39159 (Sept. 30, 1997), 62 FR 52365 (Oct. 9, 1997) (approving a CBOE 
    rule change to reduce the minimum quotation increment to \1/16\ for 
    stocks).
        \10\ Id.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        The size of the minimum trading increment for securities traded 
    through the facilities of Nasdaq is determined by the technical 
    limitations of the Nasdaq system. Currently, Nasdaq systems are capable 
    of trading securities priced under $10 in increments as fine as \1/32\ 
    of one dollar. Securities priced over $10 may be traded in increments 
    as fine as \1/16\ of one dollar.\11\ As a result, the Commission 
    recognizes that Nasdaq third market makers may trade exchange listed 
    securities priced at less than $10 in increments finer than sixteenths. 
    Nasdaq has informed the Commission that Nasdaq third market makers are 
    currently posting quotes for listed securities in increments finer than 
    sixteenths.\12\ The proposed amendment to Exchange Rule 127, will allow 
    Amex traders to match prices disseminated by Nasdaq market makers that 
    may better the Amex quote by an increment finer than the current \1/16\ 
    minimum increment. In addition, the Commission notes that the proposal 
    will enable the Exchange to match prices disseminated by other 
    exchanges in the event that another exchange were to reduce its minimum 
    trading increment.\13\ The proposal should assist Exchange members to 
    fulfill their obligation to obtain the best price for their customers. 
    Accordingly, the Commission believes that it is reasonable for the 
    Exchange to allow trading in increments finer than sixteenths for the 
    limited purpose of preventing an ITS trade-through.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \11\ The Commission notes that any change to the minimum 
    increment for securities traded through the facilities of the Nasdaq 
    system would be considered a change in an existing order-entry or 
    trading system of an SRO. Accordingly, the NASD would be required to 
    file a proposed rule change under Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act to 
    change its minimum increment.
        \12\ Telephone conversation between Andrew S. Margolin, Senior 
    Attorney, Nasdaq, Gene Lopez, Vice President, Trading and Market 
    Services, Nasdaq and David Sieradzki, Attorney, Commission on July 
    8, 1998.
        \13\ To change its minimum increment, an exchange would be 
    required to file a proposed rule change that would become 
    immediately effective under Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        The Commission finds good cause for approving the proposed rule 
    change prior to the thirtieth day after the date of publication of 
    notice thereof in the Federal Register. Approval of the proposal will 
    provide Amex members with the ability to match a better bid or offer 
    made available through ITS, thereby helping to prevent ITS trade-
    throughs and ensuring the best execution of Amex customer orders. The 
    Commission notes that this proposal is similar to a proposal by the 
    NYSE that was published for the full notice and comment period, no 
    comments were made on that proposal.\14\ Therefore, the Commission 
    believes it is consistent with Section 6(b)(5) and Section 19(b)(2) of 
    the Act to grant accelerated approval to the proposed rule change.\15\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \14\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 38897 (Aug. 1, 
    1997), 62 FR 42847 (Aug. 8, 1997).
        \15\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5) and 78s(b)(2).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    IV. Solicitation of Comments
    
        Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and 
    arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposal is 
    consistent with the Act. Persons making written submissions should file 
    six copies thereof with the Secretary, Securities and Exchange 
    Commission, 450 Fifth Street, NW., Washington, DC 20549. Copies of the 
    submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with 
    respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, 
    and all written communications relating to the
    
    [[Page 38441]]
    
    proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than 
    those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the 
    provisions of 5 U.S.C. Sec. 552, will be available for inspection and 
    copying at the Commission's Public Reference Room. Copies of such 
    filing will also be available for inspection and copying at the 
    principal office of the Exchange. All submissions should refer to File 
    No. SR-Amex-97-39 and should be submitted by August 6, 1998.
        It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the 
    Act,\16\ that the proposed rule change (SR-Amex-97-39) is approved.
    
        \16\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, 
    pursuant to delegated authority.\17\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \17\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Margaret H. McFarland,
    Deputy Secretary.
    [FR Doc. 98-18962 Filed 7-15-98; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
07/16/1998
Department:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
98-18962
Pages:
38439-38441 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Release No. 34-40189, File No. SR-AMEX-97-39
PDF File:
98-18962.pdf