98-19002. Squaw/Pole II Timber Sale, Boise National Forest, Gem County, ID  

  • [Federal Register Volume 63, Number 136 (Thursday, July 16, 1998)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 38366-38367]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 98-19002]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
    
    Forest Service
    
    
    Squaw/Pole II Timber Sale, Boise National Forest, Gem County, ID
    
    AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.
    
    ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare Environmental Impact Statement.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The Boise National Forest will prepare an Environmental Impact 
    Statement (EIS) to document the analysis and disclose the environmental 
    impacts of a proposed timber sale in the Second and Third Fork 
    drainages on the Emmett Ranger District. The proposed timber sale lies 
    within the Snowbank Inventoried Roadless Area (IRA).
        Under this proposal, 313 acres of suitable timber land would be 
    harvested, producing about 4.3 million board feet (MMBF) of sawtimber. 
    A total of 188 acres would be harvested through shelterwood methods; 55 
    acres would be commercially thinned; 36 acres would be harvested 
    through seed-tree methods; 20 acres would be harvested through 
    sanitation salvage methods; and 14 acres would be clearcut. A total of 
    178 acres would be helicopter yarded; 125 acres would be tractor 
    skidded; and 10 acres would be skyline yarded. A total of 188 acres 
    would be planted. To facilitate natural regeneration and planting 
    success, 120 acres would be underburned, and 20 acres would be 
    mechanically scarified.
        Stands to be treated would be accessed by existing roads. Included 
    are two short road segments of 0.37 and 0.22 mile, respectively, 
    constructed in the Snowbank IRA in the fall of 1997. This month (July 
    1998), these road segments will be treated to block vehicle access at 
    the IRA boundary, using a combination of gates and earth barriers. The 
    road surface will also be disked for about 100 feet behind the gate. 
    Consequently, the proposed action would include removal of the earth 
    barriers, and blading of the disked surface, to facilitate access for 
    harvest activities.
    
    DATES: Written comments concerning the scope of the analysis described 
    in this notice should be received by August 17, 1998, to ensure timely 
    consideration. No scoping meetings are planned at this time.
    
    ADDRESSES: Send written comments to Morris Huffman, Emmett District 
    Ranger, Boise National Forest, 1805 Highway 16, Emmett, ID 83716.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Questions concerning the proposed 
    action and EIS should be directed to Morris Huffman at 208-365-7000.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In August 1995, Deputy Forest Supervisor 
    Cathy Barbouletos made a decision to implement the Squaw/Pole timber 
    sale in an area that encompassed about 5,500 acres on the Emmett Ranger 
    District. The environmental assessment for the Squaw/Pole timber sale 
    stated that no activities were planned for the Snowbank IRA as part of 
    this project.
        In the fall of 1997, it was discovered that incorrect maps had been 
    used in the original analysis regarding the location of the IRA 
    boundary, and that 313 acres of ground-based and helicopter harvest 
    units had been located within the IRA, and 0.59 mile of new road had 
    been constructed within the IRA. Because the roads within the IRA have 
    already been constructed, they are considered part of the existing 
    condition and will be analyzed as such; however, the no-action 
    alternative will include obliteration of the road segments.
        Based on this new information, the Boise National Forest determined 
    the proposal may have a significant effect on the roadless resource and 
    decided to prepare an EIS. The proposal may result in the reduction of 
    approximately 885 acres of the Snowbank IRA from the National Forest 
    System. The IRA currently encompasses 35,541 acres. Proposals that may 
    substantially alter the undeveloped character of an IRA require the 
    preparation of an EIS.
        Initial analysis has identified one preliminary issue; namely, the 
    effect of the proposal on the undeveloped character and wilderness 
    attributes of the Snowbank IRA. Other potential issues may be 
    identified during the current scoping period.
        The Forest Service is seeking information and comments from 
    Federal, State, and local agencies, as well as individuals and 
    organizations who may be interested in, or affected by, the proposed 
    action. The Forest Service invites written comments and suggestions on 
    the issues related to the proposal and the area being analyzed.
        Information received will be used in preparation of the draft EIS 
    and final EIS. For the most effective use, comments should be submitted 
    to the Forest Service within 30 days from the date of publication of 
    this notice in the Federal Register.
        The Responsible Official is David D. Rittenhouse, Forest 
    Supervisor, Boise National Forest, Boise, Idaho. The decision to be 
    made is whether to harvest and replant timber stands in the project 
    area and, if so, how should these activities be carried out. The draft 
    EIS is expected to be available for public review in November 1998, 
    with a final EIS estimated to be completed in March 1999. The comment 
    period on the draft EIS will be 45 days from the date the Environmental 
    Protection Agency publishes the notice of availability in the Federal 
    Register.
        The Forest Service believes, at this early stage, it is important 
    to give reviewers notice of several court rulings related to public 
    participation in the environmental review process. First, reviewers of 
    draft EIS's must structure their participation in the environmental 
    review of the proposal so that it is meaningful and alerts an agency to 
    the reviewer's position and contention (Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power 
    Corp. v. NRDC, 435 U.S. 519, 553 (1978)). Also, environmental 
    objections that could be raised at the draft EIS stage but that are not 
    raised until after completion of the final EIS may be waived or 
    dismissed by the courts (City of Angoon v. Hodel, 803 F.2d 1016, 1022 
    (9th Cir. 1986), and Wisconsin Heritages, Inc. v.
    
    [[Page 38367]]
    
    Harris, 490 F. Supp. 1334, 1338 (E.D. Wis. 1980)). Because of these 
    court rulings, it is very important that those interested in this 
    proposed action participate by the close of the 45-day comment period 
    so that substantive comments and objections are made available to the 
    Forest Service at a time when it can meaningfully consider them and 
    respond to them in the final EIS.
        To assist the Forest Service in identifying and considering issues 
    and concerns on the proposed action, comments on the draft EIS should 
    be as specific as possible. It is also helpful if comments refer to 
    specific pages or chapter of the draft EIS. Comments may also address 
    the adequacy of the draft EIS or the merits of the alternatives 
    formulated and discussed in the draft EIS. Reviewers may wish to refer 
    to the Council on Environmental Quality Regulations for implementing 
    the procedural provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act at 
    40 CFR 1503.3 in addressing these points.
        Comments received in response to this solicitation, including names 
    and addresses of those who comment, will be considered part of the 
    public record on this proposed action and will be available for public 
    inspection. Comments submitted anonymously will be accepted and 
    considered; however, those who submit anonymous comments will not have 
    standing to appeal the subsequent decision under 36 CFR Part 215 or 
    217. Additionally, pursuant to 7 CFR 1.27(d), any person may request 
    the agency to withhold a submission from the public record by showing 
    how the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) permits such confidentiality. 
    Persons requesting such confidentiality should be aware that, under the 
    FOIA, confidentiality may be granted in only limited circumstances, 
    such as to protect trade secrets. The Forest Service will inform the 
    requester of the agency's decision regarding the request for 
    confidentiality; and, where the request is denied, the agency will 
    return the submission and notify the requester that the comments may be 
    resubmitted with or without name and address within 10 days.
    
        Dated: July 8, 1998.
    Allan B. McCombie,
    Acting Forest Supervisor.
    [FR Doc. 98-19002 Filed 7-15-98; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
07/16/1998
Department:
Forest Service
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Notice of intent to prepare Environmental Impact Statement.
Document Number:
98-19002
Dates:
Written comments concerning the scope of the analysis described in this notice should be received by August 17, 1998, to ensure timely consideration. No scoping meetings are planned at this time.
Pages:
38366-38367 (2 pages)
PDF File:
98-19002.pdf