99-17864. Airworthiness Directives; Dornier Model 328-100 Series Airplanes  

  • [Federal Register Volume 64, Number 136 (Friday, July 16, 1999)]
    [Proposed Rules]
    [Pages 38378-38379]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 99-17864]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    
    Federal Aviation Administration
    
    14 CFR Part 39
    
    [Docket No. 98-NM-366-AD]
    RIN 2120-AA64
    
    
    Airworthiness Directives; Dornier Model 328-100 Series Airplanes
    
    AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
    
    ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This document proposes the adoption of a new airworthiness 
    directive (AD) that is applicable to certain Dornier Model 328-100 
    series airplanes. This proposal would require a one-time inspection to 
    measure the offset of the de-icing tubing adjacent to the refueling 
    panel on the right-hand wing, and replacement with new improved tubing, 
    if necessary. This proposal is prompted by issuance of mandatory 
    continuing airworthiness information by a foreign civil airworthiness 
    authority. The actions specified by the proposed AD are intended to 
    prevent a blockage in the de-icing tubing which could result in a 
    malfunction of the de-icing boot. This malfunction would be unknown to 
    the flight crew, and could lead to reduced controllability of the 
    airplane during flight in icing conditions.
    
    DATES: Comments must be received by August 16, 1999.
    
    ADDRESSES: Submit comments in triplicate to the Federal Aviation 
    Administration (FAA), Transport Airplane Directorate, ANM-114, 
    Attention: Rules Docket No. 98-NM-366-AD, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., 
    Renton, Washington 98055-4056. Comments may be inspected at this 
    location between 9:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except 
    Federal holidays.
        The service information referenced in the proposed rule may be 
    obtained from Fairchild Dornier, Dornier Luftfahrt GmbH, P.O. Box 1103, 
    D-82230 Wessling, Germany. This information may be examined at the FAA, 
    Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, 
    Washington.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Norman B. Martenson, Manager, 
    International Branch, ANM-116, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 
    1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98055-4056; telephone (425) 
    227-2110; fax (425) 227-1149.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    Comments Invited
    
        Interested persons are invited to participate in the making of the 
    proposed rule by submitting such written data, views, or arguments as 
    they may desire. Communications shall identify the Rules Docket number 
    and be submitted in triplicate to the address specified above. All 
    communications received on or before the closing date for comments, 
    specified above, will be considered before taking action on the 
    proposed rule. The proposals contained in this notice may be changed in 
    light of the comments received.
        Comments are specifically invited on the overall regulatory, 
    economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the proposed rule. All 
    comments submitted will be available, both before and after the closing 
    date for comments, in the Rules Docket for examination by interested 
    persons. A report summarizing each FAA-public contact concerned with 
    the substance of this proposal will be filed in the Rules Docket.
        Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments 
    submitted in response to this notice must submit a self-addressed, 
    stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments 
    to Docket Number 98-NM-366-AD.'' The postcard will be date stamped and 
    returned to the commenter.
    
    Availability of NPRMs
    
        Any person may obtain a copy of this NPRM by submitting a request 
    to the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, ANM-114, Attention: Rules 
    Docket No. 98-NM-366-AD, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 
    98055-4056.
    
    Discussion
    
        The Luftfahrt-Bundesamt (LBA), which is the airworthiness authority 
    for Germany, notified the FAA that an unsafe condition may exist on 
    certain Dornier Model 328-100 series airplanes. The LBA advises that a 
    water trap in the de-icing tubing could cause a blockage inside the 
    tubing if water in the trap freezes. The manufacturer has told the FAA 
    that water, which penetrates through small cracks and holes in the de-
    icing boot, would be collected in the water trap. A blockage in the de-
    icing tubing could result in a malfunction of the de-icing boot. This 
    malfunction would be unknown to the flight crew. This condition, if not 
    corrected, could result in reduced controllability of the airplane when 
    flying in icing conditions.
    
    Explanation of Relevant Service Information
    
        Dornier has issued Service Bulletin SB-328-30-265, dated July 24, 
    1998, which describes procedures for a one-time detailed inspection of 
    the de-icing tubing adjacent to the refueling panel on the right-hand 
    wing, and replacement with new improved tubing, if the de-icing tubing 
    does not conform with the dimension shown in the service bulletin. 
    Accomplishment of the actions specified in the service bulletin is 
    intended to adequately address the identified unsafe condition. The LBA 
    classified this service bulletin as mandatory and issued German 
    airworthiness directive 1998-423, dated November 5, 1998, in order to 
    assure the continued airworthiness of these airplanes in Germany.
    
    FAA's Conclusions
    
        This airplane model is manufactured in Germany and is type 
    certificated for operation in the United States under the provisions of 
    Sec. 21.29 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 21.29) and the 
    applicable bilateral airworthiness agreement. Pursuant to this 
    bilateral airworthiness agreement, the LBA has kept the FAA informed of 
    the situation described above. The FAA has examined the findings of the 
    LBA, reviewed all available information, and determined that AD action 
    is necessary for products of this type design that are certificated for 
    operation in the United States.
    
    Explanation of Requirements of Proposed Rule
    
        Since an unsafe condition has been identified that is likely to 
    exist or develop on other airplanes of the same type design registered 
    in the United States, the proposed AD would require accomplishment of 
    the actions specified in the service bulletin described previously.
    
    Cost Impact
    
        The FAA estimates that 27 airplanes of U.S. registry would be 
    affected by this proposed AD, that it would take approximately 1 work 
    hour per airplane to accomplish the proposed inspection, and that the 
    average labor rate is $60 per work hour. Based on these figures, the 
    cost impact of the proposed AD on U.S. operators is estimated to be 
    $1,620 or $60 per airplane.
    
    [[Page 38379]]
    
        The cost impact figure discussed above is based on assumptions that 
    no operator has yet accomplished any of the proposed requirements of 
    this AD action, and that no operator would accomplish those actions in 
    the future if this AD were not adopted.
    
    Regulatory Impact
    
        The regulations proposed herein would not have substantial direct 
    effects on the States, on the relationship between the national 
    government and the States, or on the distribution of power and 
    responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in 
    accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this 
    proposal would not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant 
    the preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
        For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this proposed 
    regulation (1) is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under 
    Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT 
    Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); 
    and (3) if promulgated, will not have a significant economic impact, 
    positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under 
    the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. A copy of the draft 
    regulatory evaluation prepared for this action is contained in the 
    Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained by contacting the Rules 
    Docket at the location provided under the caption ADDRESSES.
    
    List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
    
        Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
    
    The Proposed Amendment
    
        Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the 
    Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration proposes to amend 
    part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as 
    follows:
    
    PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
    
        1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
    
    
    Sec. 39.13  [Amended]
    
        2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new 
    airworthiness directive:
    
    Dornier Luftfahrt GMBH: Docket No. 98-NM-366-AD.
    
        Applicability: Model 328-100 series airplanes, serial numbers 
    3042 through 3105 inclusive, certificated in any category.
    
        Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the 
    preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been 
    modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the 
    requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified, 
    altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of 
    this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an 
    alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (b) of 
    this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of 
    the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition 
    addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been 
    eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to 
    address it.
    
        Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished 
    previously.
        To prevent a blockage inside the de-icing tubing, which could 
    result in a malfunction of the de-icing boot, and consequent reduced 
    controllability of the airplane during flight in icing conditions, 
    accomplish the following:
    
    Inspection and Corrective Action
    
        (a) Within two months after the effective date of this AD, 
    perform a one-time detailed inspection to measure the offset of the 
    de-icing tubing adjacent to the refueling panel on the right-hand 
    wing in accordance with Dornier Service Bulletin SB-328-30-265, 
    dated July 24, 1998.
        (1) If the de-icing tubing offset measurement conforms to the 
    dimension shown in the service bulletin, no further action is 
    required by this AD.
        (2) If the de-icing tubing does not conform to the dimension 
    shown in the service bulletin, prior to further flight, replace it 
    with new improved tubing in accordance with instructions provided in 
    the service bulletin.
    
        Note 2: For the purposes of this AD, a detailed inspection is 
    defined as: ``An intensive visual examination of a specific 
    structural area, system, installation, or assembly to detect damage, 
    failure, or irregularity. Available lighting is normally 
    supplemented with a direct source of good lighting at intensity 
    deemed appropriate by the inspector. Inspection aids such as mirror, 
    magnifying lenses, etc. may be used. Surface cleaning and elaborate 
    access procedures may be required.''
    
    Alternative Methods of Compliance
    
        (b) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the 
    compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be 
    used if approved by the Manager, International Branch, ANM-116, FAA, 
    Transport Airplane Directorate. Operators shall submit their 
    requests through an appropriate FAA Principal Maintenance Inspector, 
    who may add comments and then send it to the Manager, International 
    Branch, ANM-116.
    
    Note 3: Information concerning the existence of approved alternative 
    methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be obtained from the 
    International Branch, ANM-116.
    
    Special Flight Permits
    
        (c) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with 
    sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 
    CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where 
    the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
    
        Note 4: The subject of this AD is addressed in German 
    airworthiness directive 1998-423, dated November 5, 1998.
    
        Issued in Renton, Washington, on July 7, 1999.
    Vi L. Lipski,
    Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification 
    Service.
    [FR Doc. 99-17864 Filed 7-15-99; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4912-13-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
07/16/1999
Department:
Federal Aviation Administration
Entry Type:
Proposed Rule
Action:
Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
Document Number:
99-17864
Dates:
Comments must be received by August 16, 1999.
Pages:
38378-38379 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 98-NM-366-AD
RINs:
2120-AA64: Airworthiness Directives
RIN Links:
https://www.federalregister.gov/regulations/2120-AA64/airworthiness-directives
PDF File:
99-17864.pdf
CFR: (2)
14 CFR 21.29
14 CFR 39.13