95-17386. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; 12-Month Finding for a Petition To List the Say's Spiketail Dragonfly as Endangered  

  • [Federal Register Volume 60, Number 136 (Monday, July 17, 1995)]
    [Proposed Rules]
    [Pages 36380-36382]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 95-17386]
    
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
    
    Fish and Wildlife Service
    
    50 CFR Part 17
    
    
    Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; 12-Month Finding 
    for a Petition To List the Say's Spiketail Dragonfly as Endangered
    
    AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
    
    ACTION: Notice of 12-month petition finding.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) announces a 12-month 
    finding for a petition to list the Say's spiketail dragonfly 
    (Cordulegaster sayi) under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as 
    amended. After review of all available scientific and commercial 
    information, the Service finds that listing this species is not 
    warranted.
    
    DATES: The finding announced in this document was made on June 20, 
    1995.
    
    ADDRESSES: Comments or questions concerning this petition should be 
    sent to the Field Supervisor, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 6620 
    Southpoint Drive South, Suite 310, Jacksonville, Florida 32216. The 
    petition, finding, supporting data, and comments are available for 
    public inspection, by appointment, during normal business hours at the 
    above address.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Michael M. Bentzien, Assistant 
    Field Supervisor, at the above address (904/232-2580).
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    Background
    
        Section 4(b)(3)(B) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as 
    amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), requires that, for any petition to 
    revise the Lists of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants that 
    contains substantial scientific or commercial information, the Service 
    make a finding within 12 months of the date of receipt of the petition 
    on whether the petitioned action is (a) not warranted, (b) warranted, 
    or (c) warranted but precluded from immediate proposal by other pending 
    proposals of higher priority. Section 4(b)(3)(C) of the Act requires 
    that petitions for which the requested action is found to be warranted 
    but precluded should be treated as though resubmitted on the date of 
    such finding, i.e., requiring a subsequent finding to be made within 12 
    months. Such 12-month findings shall be published promptly in the 
    Federal Register.
        On February 15, 1994, the Service received a petition dated January 
    13, 1994, from Ms. Nancy Fraser Williams on behalf of the Rock Creek 
    Owners' Association, Gainesville, Florida, to list the Say's spiketail 
    dragonfly (Cordulegaster sayi) as endangered. A 90-day finding was made 
    by the Service that the petition presented substantial information 
    indicating that the requested action may be warranted. The 90-day 
    finding was announced in the Federal Register on October 26, 1994 (59 
    FR 53776). The finding also announced the Service's formal review of 
    the species' status and solicited information and public comment 
    regarding population trends, biological vulnerability, and threats to 
    this species. Comments and information received by December 27, 1994, 
    were considered in the 12-month finding.
        On the basis of the best available scientific and commercial 
    information, the Service finds that listing the Say's spiketail 
    dragonfly is not warranted at the present time.
        The earliest description of this dragonfly was made by Selys (1854) 
    from a British Museum specimen taken in Georgia. Westfall (1953) 
    reported three males collected at Lake City in 1896 and 1897 as the 
    first specimens from Florida. Westfall and Johnson (unpublished) 
    attributed additional state records to misidentifications with 
    congeneric species. Their review demonstrated that the only known 
    specimens of Cordulegaster sayi in existence were collected from eight 
    specific historic sites in either Georgia or Florida. The current range 
    includes central Georgia to northern and western Florida. Rock Creek is 
    the best described and most productive of the eight historic sites. 
    Sites on public land include Gordonia-Altamaha State Park in Georgia; 
    Gold Head Branch and Torreya State Parks, San Felasco Hammock State 
    Preserve, and Blackwater River State Forest in Florida. Besides Rock 
    Creek, private land sites include Lake City, Columbia County, and Camp 
    Crystal Lake, Clay County, Florida. Approximately a dozen specimens 
    have been collected from these other sites. The most recent collections 
    were made in 1994 from Blackwater River State Forest. Kroetzer and 
    Kroetzer (unpublished) collected a specimen from Conecuh National 
    Forest in Alabama in 1994 which has characteristics of both 
    Cordulegaster sayi and its congener C. bilineata.
        Say's spiketail dragonfly is associated with trickling hillside 
    seepages in deciduous forests (Dunkle 1989). Adults have been collected 
    from late February through late April in open areas within about a half 
    mile of seepage breeding sites (Westfall and Mauffray 1994). Westfall 
    (pers. comm. 1994) collected larvae of various instars from seepage 
    pools and beneath wet leaves within and on the border of the seepage 
    streamlets. Larval collections indicate that the species has a multi-
    year life cycle (Westfall and Mauffray 1994, Mauffray in litt. 1994).
        Two seepages modified by development of the Rock Creek subdivision 
    are the only known adverse habitat changes at this site (Mauffray in 
    litt. 1994). Despite these modifications, Mauffray (Westfall and 
    Mauffray 1994) discovered a sizable population in 1992. The collection 
    of larvae from flooded seeps in 1993 (Westfall and Mauffray 1994) 
    following two successive flood events did not support Mauffray's belief 
    (in litt. 1994) that unflooded seeps are needed as dragonfly refugia 
    for population survival. An observed increase in adult numbers from 
    1993 to 1994 would also not have been predicted following two 
    consecutive annual floods. The observed fluctuations in adult numbers 
    before and after surrounding land development may therefore be more a 
    function of asynchronous emergence due to the species' presumed multi-
    year life cycle rather than an adverse response to flooding. Concerns 
    for seepage damage by cattle (Daigle in litt. 1985) and pedestrians and 
    vehicles (V. Compton, Blackwater Forestry Resource Administrator, pers. 
    comm. 1994) in Blackwater River State Forest are the only other known 
    instances rangewide of possible habitat impacts. Despite these 
    observations, two adults were collected in 1994 in the vicinity of the 
    historic collection site (J. Daigle, Florida Department of 
    Environmental Protection, pers. comm., 1994)
        Between 1970 and 1994, Mauffray (in litt. 1994) conservatively 
    estimated that collecting had removed over 140 adult specimens from 
    Rock Creek. This level 
    
    [[Page 36381]]
    of collecting was related to the sites's uniqueness and accessibility. 
    Despite this collecting pressure, the population persisted. The 
    species' short flight season, variable emergence, lack of collection 
    pressure on larvae, and increased conservation awareness probably 
    mitigated serious collecting impacts.
        Neither the city of Gainesville, Florida, nor Alachua County have 
    local ordinances which mandate special local protection for the 
    dragonfly or the habitat at Rock Creek (M. Drummond, Alachua County 
    Environmental Protection Department, pers. comm.). Both Florida and 
    Georgia have statutes intended to provide special protection and 
    conservation measures for species designated according to specific 
    criteria within the respective state laws. Say's spiketail dragonfly 
    currently has no special designation in either state.
        Agencies administering and managing parks and preserves in both 
    states prohibit the removal of non-exempt fauna and flora from lands 
    entrusted to them without prior written permission from the authorized 
    representative (B. Wert in litt. 1995, D. Bryan in litt. 1995). The 
    same requirement applies to the Florida state forest system (V. 
    Compton, pers. comm.).
        The current status and condition of the Lake City collection site 
    is unknown since the collections were made nearly 100 years ago and 
    exact locations were not specified. The Camp Crystal Lake site consists 
    of open fields and three ravines administered respectively by the 
    Alachua County School Board and the city of Keystone Heights Airport 
    Authority. Both areas have controlled access. Leases provided to Camp 
    Crystal Lake and Keystone Heights Sportsmen's Club by the Airport 
    Authority which permit ravine access also prohibit property destruction 
    or alteration as well as the removal of any plants or animals other 
    than specified game animals without prior permission from the lessor 
    (G. Reid, Keystone Heights, Airport Authority, pers. comm., 1994). An 
    Airport Authority property manager patrols the areas three days a week.
        Although existing regulatory mechanisms do not protect all Say's 
    spiketail habitat, available information indicates that some protection 
    is being afforded on public lands.
        The Clean Water Act (section 404) is the primary federal law that 
    provides some protection of aquatic habitats determined by the U.S. 
    Army Corps of Engineers to be jurisdictional wetlands. These laws 
    provide no protection against modification or development of upland 
    habitats adjacent to the seepage breeding sites.
        Where habitat of this species occurs on other Federal lands, 
    including but not limited to the Forest Service, Park Service and 
    Department of Defense, each agency's standard natural resource and 
    wildlife protection guidance are implemented.
        Mauffray (in litt. 1994) expressed concern for the Rock Creek 
    population's survival from other man-made and natural factors such as 
    insecticides, fertilizers from adjacent turf and landscape areas, fire, 
    and drought. The Service acknowledges that man-made drains traversing 
    the Rock Creek riparian corridor could serve as conduits for limited 
    point and non-point source pollution within breeding sites. Mosquito 
    spraying also may impact adult dragonflies and chemicals reaching 
    breeding sites from sheet flow of surface and subsurface waters 
    likewise may impact larvae. Information which substantiates these 
    impacts, however, was not found. The dragonfly's apparent semi-aquatic 
    larval stage should help it survive periods of low water. The Service 
    considers the probable impacts from fire low because of the habitat's 
    relative resistance to burning. The potential impact of agriculture and 
    silviculture on habitat rangewide is unknown.
        The distance separating known collection sites suggests that gene 
    flow among populations of this habitat specialist was historically 
    restricted. The adults' presumed short flight range further restricts 
    potential exchange of genetic material. Although impacts to the Rock 
    Creek deme (local populations with little or no outbreeding) might 
    result in some loss of genetic diversity from the species genome, it 
    would have little or no significance to the genetic fitness of other 
    demes.
        The Service believes that the floodwater retention project, if 
    implemented, would not result in the extirpation of the Rock Creek 
    population. An analysis of historic population fluctuations and 
    Westfall and Mauffray's 1993 Rock Creek study does not support their 
    contention that additional flooding would severely impact this 
    dragonfly. Other factors such as chemicals, fire, and drought were 
    assessed for cumulative impacts. Some impact might be expected if the 
    factors occurred close enough in time to affect multiple life stages or 
    generations. The Service's position is that the factors are either not 
    factually supported and/or that the probability for their close 
    temporal occurrence resulting in cumulative impacts is very low. The 
    petitioner's concern for imminent impact to the population from the 
    proposed project has been eliminated since Gainesville has placed the 
    project on hold for an estimated three to five years while it updates 
    its planimetric database (G. Pearson, City Engineer, Public Works 
    Department, pers. comm.).
        Seven of the eight historic collection sites remain intact and six 
    receive some protection and management. Adults were recently collected 
    at one of these sites and suitable habitat also exists at other as yet 
    unsurveyed sites. The Service therefore concludes that the probability 
    of finding other reproducing populations rangewide is high. The Service 
    has funded a systematic survey of historic sites and other public lands 
    in portions of Florida, Georgia, and Alabama. The survey hopes to 
    better delineate the species' range and distribution. A single specimen 
    representing a new site has since been collected at Camp Blanding 
    National Guard Military Reservation in Clay County, Florida.
        On the basis of the best available scientific and commercial 
    information, the Service finds that listing Say's spiketail dragonfly 
    as endangered is not warranted at the present time because the taxon 
    presently is not in danger of extinction or likely to become so in the 
    foreseeable future. The species will continue to be retained in 
    category 2 at least until the results of the current status survey have 
    been assessed. Category 2 candidates are those for which information 
    now in the possession of the Service indicates that proposing to list 
    as endangered or threatened is possibly appropriate, but for which 
    conclusive data on biological vulnerability and threat are not 
    currently available to support proposed rules. In addition, the status 
    of the proposed floodwater retention project will be monitored as will 
    the Rock Creek population. The condition of new and other existing 
    populations will be evaluated and pre-listing conservation actions 
    instituted, where feasible, to further protect and restore this species 
    and its habitat. The Service will continue to seek additional 
    information about population trends, biological vulnerability and 
    threats to this species. If additional information becomes available in 
    the future indicating that listing as endangered or threatened is 
    appropriate, the Service may reassess the listing priority for this 
    species.
    
    References
    
        A complete list of references used in the preparation of this 
    finding is available upon request from the Jacksonville Field Office 
    (see ADDRESSES section). 
    
    [[Page 36382]]
    
        Author: The primary author of this document is Mr. John F. Milio 
    (see ADDRESSES section).
    
    Authority
    
        The authority for this action is the Endangered Species Act of 
    1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
    
    List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 17
    
        Endangered and threatened species, Exports, Imports, Reporting and 
    recordkeeping requirements, Transportation.
    
        Dated: June 20, 1995.
    
    Mollie H. Beattie,
    
    Director, Fish and Wildlife Service.
    
    [FR Doc. 95-17386 Filed 7-14-95; 8:45 am]
    
    BILLING CODE 4310-55-P
    
    

Document Information

Published:
07/17/1995
Department:
Fish and Wildlife Service
Entry Type:
Proposed Rule
Action:
Notice of 12-month petition finding.
Document Number:
95-17386
Dates:
The finding announced in this document was made on June 20, 1995.
Pages:
36380-36382 (3 pages)
PDF File:
95-17386.pdf
CFR: (1)
50 CFR 17