98-19081. Robert M. Golden, M.D.; Denial of Application  

  • [Federal Register Volume 63, Number 137 (Friday, July 17, 1998)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 38669-38670]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 98-19081]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
    
    Drug Enforcement Administration
    
    
    Robert M. Golden, M.D.; Denial of Application
    
        On January 9, 1998, the Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of 
    Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), issued an 
    Order to Show Cause to Robert M. Golden, M.D., of Alpharetta, Georgia, 
    notifying him of an opportunity to show cause as to why DEA should not 
    deny his application for registration as a practitioner under 21 U.S.C. 
    823(f), for reason for such registration would be inconsistent with the 
    public interest. The order also notified Dr. Golden that should no 
    request for a hearing be filed within 30 days, his hearing right would 
    be deemed waived.
        The DEA received a signed receipt indicating that the order was 
    received on January 16, 1998. No request for a hearing or any other 
    reply was received by the DEA from Dr. Golden or anyone purporting to 
    represent him in this matter. Therefore, the Acting Deputy 
    Administrator, finding that: (1) 30 days have passed since the receipt 
    of the Order to Show Cause, and (2) no request for a hearing having 
    been received, concludes that Dr. Golden is deemed to have waived his 
    hearing right. After considering material from the investigative file 
    in this matter, the Acting Deputy Administrator now enters order 
    without a hearing pursuant to 21 CFR 1301.43(d) and (e) and 1301.46.
        The Acting Deputy Administrator finds that Dr. Golden previously 
    possessed DEA Certificate of Registration, AG6243125. On May 25, 1994, 
    an Order to Show Cause was issued proposing to revoke that Certificate 
    of Registration, alleging that Dr. Golden's continued registration 
    would be inconsistent with the public interest. Following a hearing 
    before Administrative Law Judge Paul A. Tenney, the then-Deputy 
    Administrator revoked Dr. Golden's DEA registration effective June 17, 
    1996. See Robert M. Golden, M.D., 61 FR 24808 (May 16, 1996).
        In the prior proceeding, the then-Deputy Administrator found that 
    in April 1987, Dr. Golden entered into a Consent Order with the Georgia 
    State Board of Medical Examiners based upon allegations of 
    recordkeeping violations, the prescribing or dispensing of controlled 
    substances while not acting in the usual course of professional 
    practice, and the prescribing or ordering of controlled substances for 
    an illegitimate medical purpose. In addition, the then-Deputy 
    Administrator found that in 1992, a confidential informant received 
    prescriptions for Xanax, a Schedule IV controlled substance, from Dr. 
    Golden who issued the prescriptions using names other than that of the 
    informant. Also, on two occasions in 1992, Dr. Golden issued 
    prescriptions for Xanax to an undercover police officer for no 
    legitimate medical purpose. In his final order the then-Deputy 
    Administrator found that Dr. Golden's conduct ``demonstrate[s] a 
    cavalier behavior regarding controlled substances'' and that ``[Dr. 
    Golden] did not acknowledge any possibility of questionable conduct in 
    his prescribing practices.'' The then-Deputy Administrator found that 
    he ``was provided no basis to conclude that [Dr. Golden] would lawfully 
    handle controlled substances in the future,'' and therefore revoked Dr. 
    Golden's previous registration.
        On June 15, 1997, Dr. Golden submitted an application for a new DEA 
    registration. That application is the subject of these proceedings. The 
    Acting Deputy Administrator concludes that the then-Deputy 
    Administrator's May 16, 1996 decision regarding Dr. Golden is res 
    judicata for purposes of this proceeding. See Stanley Alan Azen, M.D., 
    61 FR 57893 (1996) (where the findings in a previous revocation 
    proceeding were held to be res judicata in a subsequent administrative 
    proceeding.) The then-Deputy Administrator's determination of the facts 
    relating to the previous revocation of Dr. Golden's DEA registration is 
    conclusive. Accordingly, the Acting Deputy Administrator concludes that 
    the critical consideration in this proceeding is whether the 
    circumstances, which existed at the time of the prior proceeding, have 
    changed sufficiently to support a conclusion that Dr. Golden's 
    registration would be in the public interest.
        The Acting Deputy Administrator finds that documentation in the 
    investigative file reveals that since the prior proceeding, Dr. 
    Golden's state medical license was placed on probation on April 4, 
    1996, for at least four years, pursuant to a Consent Order with the 
    Composite State Board of Medical Examiners for the State of Georgia 
    (Board). As a result of this Consent Order, Dr. Golden is prohibited 
    from handling Schedule I through III controlled substances, and other 
    specifically named substances. In addition, Dr. Golden must use 
    triplicate prescriptions, maintain a log of his handling of controlled 
    substances, and attend continuing medical education courses.
        The Acting Deputy Administrator finds that there is a letter with 
    attachments from Dr. Golden dated October 8, 1997, in the investigative 
    file. This documentation reveals that Dr. Golden now practices cosmetic 
    surgery; that he would like to be able to prescribe Valium and Versed, 
    both Schedule IV controlled substances; that he has been in compliance 
    with the Board's April 1996 Consent Order; and
    
    [[Page 38670]]
    
    that on May 16, 1997, he completed a course in the appropriate 
    prescribing of controlled substances. On his application for 
    registration, Dr. Golden states that ``I feel that I have become more 
    responsible * * *.'' However, Dr. Golden did not respond to the Order 
    to Show Cause, and therefore did not provide the Acting Deputy 
    Administrator with any other evidence for consideration.
        Pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 823(f), the Deputy Administrator may deny an 
    application for a DEA Certificate of Registration if he determines that 
    such registration would be inconsistent with the public interest. In 
    determining the public interest, the following factors are considered.
        (1) The recommendation of the appropriate State licensing board or 
    professional disciplinary authority.
        (2) The applicant's experience in dispensing, or conducting 
    research with respect to controlled substances.
        (3) The applicant's conviction record under Federal or State laws 
    relating to the manufacture, distribution, or dispensing of controlled 
    substances.
        (4) Compliance with applicable State, Federal, or local laws 
    relating to controlled substances.
        (5) Such other conduct which may threaten the public health and 
    safety.
        These factors are to be considered in the disjunctive; the Deputy 
    Administrator may rely on any one or a combination of factors and may 
    give each factor the weight he deems appropriate in determining whether 
    a registration should be revoked or an application for registration be 
    denied. See Henry J. Schwarz, Jr., M.D., 54 FR 16422 (1989).
        As discussed above, Dr. Golden's previous registration was found to 
    be inconsistent with the public interest. Since that time, Dr. Golden's 
    state medical license was again placed on probation until at least 
    April 2000. The Acting Deputy Administrator finds that Dr. Golden has 
    not presented sufficient evidence to indicate that his registration 
    would now be in the public interest. While Dr. Golden has taken a 
    course in the appropriate prescribing of controlled substances, and he 
    asserts on his application that he has ``become more responsible,'' the 
    Acting Deputy Administrator is not convinced that Respondent has 
    accepted responsibility for his previous mishandling of controlled 
    substances. Therefore, the Acting Deputy Administrator concludes that 
    Dr. Golden's registration would be inconsistent with the public 
    interest.
        Accordingly, the Acting Deputy Administrator of the Drug 
    Enforcement Administration, pursuant to the authority vested in him by 
    21 U.S.C. 823 and 28 CFR 0.100(b) and 0.104, hereby orders that the 
    application for registration, executed by Robert M. Golden, M.D., be, 
    and it hereby is, denied. This order is effective August 17, 1998.
    
        Dated: July 10, 1998.
    Donnie R. Marshall,
    Acting Deputy Administrator.
    [FR Doc. 98-19081 Filed 7-16-98; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4410-09-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
07/17/1998
Department:
Drug Enforcement Administration
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
98-19081
Pages:
38669-38670 (2 pages)
PDF File:
98-19081.pdf