02-17977. Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change by the International Securities Exchange, Inc. Relating to the Execution of Complex Orders Involving Options and Single Stock Futures  

  • Start Preamble July 11, 2002.

    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Act”),[1] and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,[2] notice is hereby given that on June 27, 2002, the International Securities Exchange, Inc. (“ISE” or “Exchange”) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.

    I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange is proposing to adopt rules and procedures governing the execution of complex orders involving options and single stock futures.

    The text of the proposed rule change appears below. New text is in italics.

    Rule 722. Complex Orders

    (a) Complex Orders Defined. A complex order is any order for the same account as defined below:

    * * * * *

    (5) Combination orders with non-equity options legs. One or more legs of a complex order may be to purchase or sell a stated number of units of another security.

    (i) Stock-Option Order. A stock-option order is an order to buy or sell a stated number of units of an underlying stock or a security convertible into the underlying stock (“convertible security”) coupled with either [(i)] (A) the purchase or sale of option contract(s) on the opposite side of the market representing either the same number of units of the underlying stock or convertible security or the number of units of the underlying stock necessary to create a delta neutral position; or [(ii)] (B) the purchase or sale of an equal number of put and call option contracts, each having the same exercise price, expiration date, and each representing the same number of units of stock, as and on the opposite side of the market from, the stock or convertible security portion of the order.

    (ii) SSF-Option Order. A SSF-option order is an order to buy or sell a stated number of units of a single stock future or a security convertible into a single stock future (“convertible SSF”) coupled with either (A) the purchase or sale of option contract(s) on the opposite side of the market representing either the same number of units of stock underlying the single stock future or convertible SSF, or the number of units of stock underlying the single stock future or convertible SSF necessary to create a delta neutral position; or (B) the purchase or sale of an equal number of put and call option contracts, each having the same exercise price, expiration date, and each representing the same number of units of underlying stock, as and on the opposite side of the market from, the stock underlying the single stock future or convertible SSF portion of the order.

    * * * * *
    Start Printed Page 47011

    (b) Applicability of Exchange Rules. Except as otherwise provided in this Rule, complex orders shall be subject to all other Exchange Rules that pertain to orders generally.

    * * * * *

    (2) Complex Order Priority. Notwithstanding the provisions of Rule 713, a complex order, as defined in paragraph (a) of this Rule, may be executed at a total credit or debit price with one other Member without giving priority to bids or offers established in the marketplace that are no better than the bids or offers comprising such total credit or debit; provided, however, that if any of the bids or offers established in the marketplace consist of a Public Customer limit order, the price of at least one leg of the complex order must trade at a price that is better than the corresponding bid or offer in the marketplace. Under the circumstances described above, the option leg of a stock-option order[,] as defined in subparagraph (a)(5)(i) (A) of this Rule, or SSF-option order as defined in subparagraph (a)(5)(ii)(A) of this Rule, has priority over bids and offers established in the marketplace by Non-Customer orders and market maker quotes that are no better than the price of the options leg, but not over such bids and offers established by Public Customer Orders. The option legs of a stock-option order as defined in subparagraph (a)(5)(ii) (B), or SSF-option order as defined in subparagraph (a)(5)(ii)(B), consisting of a combination order with stock or single stock futures, as the case may be, may be executed in accordance with the first sentence of this subparagraph (b)(2).

    Supplementary Material to Rule 722

    .01 This Rule 722 will be in effect until October 18, 2002.

    .02 A bid or offer made as part of a stock-option order[,] (as defined in (a)(5) (i) above)[,] or a SSF-option order (as defined in (a)(5)(ii) above) is made and accepted subject to the following conditions: (1) the [stock-option] order must disclose all legs of the order and must identify the security (which in the case of a single stock future requires sufficient identification to determine the market(s) on which the single stock future trades) and the price at which the non-option leg(s) of the order is to be filled; and (2) concurrent with the execution of the options leg of the order, the initiating member and each member that agrees to be a contra-party on the non-option leg(s) of the order must take steps immediately to transmit the non-option leg(s) to a non-Exchange market(s) for execution. Failure to observe these requirements will be considered conduct inconsistent with just and equitable principles of trade and a violation of Rule 400.

    A trade representing the execution of the options leg of a stock-option or SSF-option order may be cancelled at the request of any member that is a party to that trade only if market conditions in any of the non-Exchange market(s) prevent the execution of the non'option leg(s) at the price(s) agreed upon.

    II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.

    A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    (1) Purpose

    Last year the Commission approved Exchange rules defining various types of “complex orders,” including orders involving multiple options legs and stock/option orders.[3] In addition, the Exchange recently adopted procedures for executing stock/option complex orders.[4] The purpose of this proposed rule change is to authorize the execution of complex orders involving options and single stock futures pursuant to procedures that are virtually identical to the stock/option procedures. The Exchange states that this proposed rule change, if approved by the Commission, would become part of the complex order pilot program approved to operate through October 18, 2002.[5]

    The proposed rules would permit Exchange members to enter option-stock future complex orders. As with stock/option orders, the option leg of the transaction would have priority over non-customer orders at the same price. The Exchange states that it would execute the options leg of the trade and the parties then would seek to execute the stock futures leg on an appropriate exchange. Because the stock futures products may not be fungible between markets, the complex order would need to specify the market of execution for the stock futures leg. As with stock/option orders, if the parties are unable to execute the single stock futures leg of the transaction due to a change in market conditions, the Exchange states that it would cancel the options leg of the transaction at the request of a party to the trade.

    (2) Statutory Basis

    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with the requirements under Section 6(b)(5) of the Act [6] that an exchange have rules that are designed to foster cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in regulating, clearing, settling, processing information with respect to, and facilitating transaction in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism for a free and open market and a national market system, and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest.

    B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The proposed rule change does not impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

    C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received from Members, Participants, or Others

    The Exchange has not solicited, and does not intend to solicit, comments on this proposed rule change. The Exchange has not received any unsolicited written comments from members or other interested parties.

    III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action

    Within 35 days of the date of publication of this notice in the Federal Register or within such longer period (i) as the Commission may designate up to 90 days of such date if it finds such longer period to be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding, or (ii) as to which the Exchange consents, the Commission will:

    (A) by order approve such proposed rule change; or

    (B) institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule change should be disapproved. Start Printed Page 47012

    IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Persons making written submissions should file six copies thereof with the Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 Fifth Street, NW, Washington, DC 20549-0609. Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room. Copies of such filings will also be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All submissions should refer to File No. SR-ISE-2002-18 and should be submitted by August 7, 2002.

    Start Signature

    For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated authority.[7]

    Margaret H. McFarland,

    Deputy Secretary.

    End Signature End Preamble

    Footnotes

    3.  See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 44955 (October 18, 2001), 66 FR 53819 (October 24, 2001) (File No. SR-ISE-2001-18).

    Back to Citation

    4.  See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 45985 (May 24, 2002), 67 FR 38533 (June 4, 2002) (File No. SR-ISE-2002-14).

    Back to Citation

    5.  See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 44955, supra note 3.

    Back to Citation

    [FR Doc. 02-17977 Filed 7-16-02; 8:45 am]

    BILLING CODE 8010-01-P

Document Information

Published:
07/17/2002
Department:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
02-17977
Pages:
47010-47012 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Release No. 34-46181, File No. SR-ISE-2002-18
EOCitation:
of 2002-07-11
PDF File:
02-17977.pdf