95-17613. Petitions for Exemption; Summary of Petitions Received; Dispositions of Petitions Issued  

  • [Federal Register Volume 60, Number 137 (Tuesday, July 18, 1995)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 36866-36867]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 95-17613]
    
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    [Summary Notice No. PE-95-25]
    
    
    Petitions for Exemption; Summary of Petitions Received; 
    Dispositions of Petitions Issued
    
    AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
    
    ACTION: Notice of petitions for exemption received and of dispositions 
    of prior petitions.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: Pursuant to FAA's rulemaking provisions governing the 
    application, processing, and disposition of petitions for exemption (14 
    CFR Part 11), this notice contains a summary of certain petitions 
    seeking relief from specified requirements of the Federal Aviation 
    Regulations (14 CFR Chapter I), dispositions of certain petitions 
    previously received, and corrections. The purpose of this notice is to 
    improve the public's awareness of, and participation in, this aspect of 
    FAA's regulatory activities. Neither publication of this notice nor the 
    inclusion or omission of information in the summary is intended to 
    affect the legal status of any petition or its final disposition.
    
    DATE: Comments on petitions received must identify the petition docket 
    number involved and must be received on or before August 7, 1995.
    
    ADDRESS: Send comments on any petition in triplicate to: Federal 
    Aviation Administration, Office of the Chief Counsel, Attn: Rule Docket 
    (AGC-200), Petition Docket No. ____, 800 Independence Avenue, SW., 
    Washington, D.C. 20591.
        Comments may also be sent electronically to the following internet 
    address: nprmcmts@mail.hq.faa.gov.
        The petition, any comments received, and a copy of any final 
    disposition are filed in the assigned regulatory docket and are 
    available for examination in the Rules Docket (AGC-200), Room 915G, FAA 
    Headquarters Building (FOB 10A), 800 Independence Avenue, SW., 
    Washington, D.C. 20591; telephone (202) 267-3132.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
    Mr. D. Michael Smith, Office of Rulemaking (ARM-1), Federal Aviation 
    Administration, 800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591; 
    telephone (202) 267-7470.
        This notice is published pursuant to paragraphs (c), (e), and (g) 
    of Sec. 11.27 of Part 11 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 
    Part 11).
    
    
    [[Page 36867]]
    
        Issued in Washington, D.C., on July 13, 1995.
    Donald P. Byrne,
    Assistant Chief Counsel for Regulations.
    
    Petitions for Exemption
    
        Docket No.: 28191.
        Petitioner: Mr. Louis D. Carrara, Jr.
        Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR 121.383(c).
        Description of Relief Sought: To permit Mr. Carrara to serve as a 
    pilot on an airplane engaged in operations conducted under part 121 
    after he has reached his 60th birthday.
    
        Docket No.: 28205.
        Petitioner: Mr. Ralph W. Sirek.
        Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR 121.383(c).
        Description of Relief Sought: To permit Mr. Sirek to be a pilot in 
    operations conducted under part 121 after reaching his 60th birthday.
    
        Docket No.: 28210.
        Petitioner: Mr. John A. Marshall, Jr.
        Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR 121.383(c).
        Description of Relief Sought: To permit Mr. Marshall to act as a 
    pilot in operations conducted under part 121 after reaching his 60th 
    birthday.
    
        Docket No.: 28225.
        Petitioner: Northwest Airlines, Inc.
        Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR 43.9.
        Description of Relief Sought: To permit Northwest Airlines,Inc., to 
    use ``electronic signatures'' to meet the signature requirement 
    specified in Sec. 43.9.
    
        Docket No.: 28228.
        Petitioner: Flight Dynamics.
        Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR 25.562.
        Description of Relief Sought: To allow Flight Dynamics temporary 
    exemption from the head injury criteria of Sec. 25.562 for its Dornier 
    328 aircraft until June 30, 1996, to allow redevelopments necessary to 
    accommodate revised seating.
    
    Dispositions of Petitions
    
        Docket No.: 22558.
        Petitioner: Boeing Commercial Airplane Company.
        Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR 47.69(b).
        Description of Relief Sought: To extend Exemption No. 3513, as 
    amended, which was originally granted to allow the agency to consider 
    amending the regulations. Because a final decision is still pending, 
    the exemption is extended to prevent disruption of the petitioner's 
    operations being conducted under the original petition. Grant of 
    Temporary Exemption, May 24, 1995, Exemption No. 3513J.
    
        Docket No.: 25862.
        Petitioner: Cessna Aircraft Company.
        Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR 47.69(b).
        Description of Relief Sought/Disposition: To extend Exemption No. 
    5043, as amended, which was originally granted to allow the agency to 
    consider amending the regulations. Because a final decision is still 
    pending, the exemption is extended to prevent disruption of the 
    petitioner's operations being conducted under the original petition. 
    Grant of Temporary Exemption, March 27, 1995, Exemption No. 5043C.
    
        Docket No.: 26176.
        Petitioner: AMR Combs.
        Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR 135.165(a) (1) and (6) and 
    (b)(1), (6), and (7).
        Description of Relief Sought/Disposition: To extend Exemption No. 
    5334, as amended, which permits AMR Combs, Inc., to operate turbojet 
    airplanes in extended overwater operations with one high-frequency 
    communication system within certain named geographical areas subject to 
    certain conditions and limitations. Grant, May 24, 1995, Exemption No. 
    5334B.
    
        Docket No.: 27136.
        Petitioner: Kenai Air Alaska, Inc.
        Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR 135.143(c)(2).
        Description of Relief Sought/Disposition: To extend Exemption No. 
    5699, which allows Kenai Air Alaska, Inc., to operate its part 135 
    aircraft without a TSO-C112 (Mode S) transponder installed on its 
    aircraft. Grant, May 24, 1995, Exemption No. 5699A.
    
        Docket No.: 27144.
        Petitioner: New York Helicopter.
        Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR 135.143(c)(2).
        Description of Relief Sought/Disposition: To extend Exemption No. 
    5712, which allows New York Helicopter to operate its part 135 aircraft 
    without a TSO-C112 (Mode S) transponder installed on its aircraft. 
    Grant, May 24, 1995, Exemption No. 5712A.
    
        Docket No.: 27237.
        Petitioner: Midway Aviation, Inc.
        Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR 135.143(c)(2).
        Description of Relief Sought/Disposition: To extend Exemption No. 
    5738, which permits Midway Aviation, Inc., to operate under the 
    provisions of part 135 without a TSO-C112 (Mode S) transponder. Grant, 
    June 5, 1995, Exemption No. 5738A.
    
        Docket No.: 27430.
        Petitioner: Midwest Flying Service, Inc.
        Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR 135.143(c)(2).
        Description of Relief Sought/Disposition: To extend Exemption No. 
    5757, which permits Midwest Flying Service, Inc., to operate aircraft 
    N558Y, serial number 27-2695, in part 135 operations without a TSO-C112 
    (Mode S) transponder installed. Grant, June 5, 1995, Exemption No. 
    5757A.
    
        Docket No.: 28096.
        Petitioner: Boeing Commercial Airplane Group.
        Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR 25.1435(b)(1).
        Description of Relief Sought/Disposition: To permit type 
    certification of the Model 737-700 by testing of the complete hydraulic 
    system at 3400 psig, the system relief pressure. Grant, May 17, 1995, 
    Exemption No. 6086.
    
        Docket No.: 28118.
        Petitioner: King Airelines, Inc.
        Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR 135.143(c)(2).
        Description of Relief Sought/Disposition: To permit King Airelines, 
    Inc., to operate without a TSO-C112 (Mode S) transponder installed on 
    its aircraft operating under the provisions of part 135. Grant, May 24, 
    1995, Exemption No. 6093.
    
        Docket No.: 28207.
        Petitioner: Hillsboro Helicopters, Inc.
        Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR 133.19(a) and 133.51.
        Description of Relief Sought/Disposition: To allow Hillsboro 
    Helicopters, Inc., to conduct external-load operations using a 
    Canadian-registered rotorcraft in the United States. Grant, May 26, 
    1995, Exemption No. 6092.
    
    [FR Doc. 95-17613 Filed 7-17-95; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
    
    

Document Information

Published:
07/18/1995
Department:
Transportation Department
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Notice of petitions for exemption received and of dispositions of prior petitions.
Document Number:
95-17613
Dates:
Comments on petitions received must identify the petition docket number involved and must be received on or before August 7, 1995.
Pages:
36866-36867 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Summary Notice No. PE-95-25
PDF File:
95-17613.pdf