96-18207. Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation, et al.; Natural Gas Certificate Filings  

  • [Federal Register Volume 61, Number 139 (Thursday, July 18, 1996)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 37462-37463]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 96-18207]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
    [Docket No. CP96-386-001, et al.]
    
    
    Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation, et al.; Natural Gas 
    Certificate Filings
    
    July 11, 1996.
        Take notice that the following filings have been made with the 
    Commission:
    
    1. Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation
    
    [Docket No. CP96-386-001]
    
        Take notice that on July 3, 1996, Columbia Gas Transmission 
    Corporation (Columbia), 1700 MacCorkle Avenue, S.E., Charleston, West 
    Virginia 25325-1273, filed in Docket No. CP96-386-001 pursuant to Rule 
    212 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 
    385.212) a motion for acceptance of proposed firm and interruptible 
    default contracts which will be used by Columbia Natural Resources, 
    Inc. (CNR), in the event negotiated agreements cannot be reached 
    between CNR and the gathering customers affected by the spin-down of 
    gathering facilities proposed in these proceedings. Columbia's motion 
    is on file with the Commission and open for public inspection.
        Columbia states that because the proposed default contracts meet 
    the Commission's criteria set forth in Arkla Gathering Services 
    Company, 69 FERC para. 61,280 (1994), the Commission should approve the 
    default contracts.
        Comment date: August 1, 1996, in accordance with the first 
    paragraph of Standard Paragraph F at the end of this notice.
    
    2. Carnegie Interstate Pipeline Company and Carnegie Production 
    Company
    
    [Docket No. CP96-612-000]
    
        Take notice that on June 28, 1996, Carnegie Interstate Pipeline 
    Company (CIPCO) and Carnegie Production Company (Carnegie Production) 
    800 Regis Avenue, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15236, filed in Docket No. 
    CP96-612-000 a joint application pursuant to Section 7(b) of the 
    Natural Gas Act for permission and approval to permit CIPCO to abandon 
    jurisdictional gas purchase contracts by transfer to Carnegie 
    Production, all as more fully set forth in the application which is on 
    file with the Commission and open to public inspection.
        Specifically, Applicants request that the Commission authorize 
    CIPCO to abandon by transfer to Carnegie Production, all of the FERC 
    jurisdictional contracts currently held by Carnegie Production and 
    Marketing (CP&M), CIPCO's gas production and marketing division. 
    Applicants state that Carnegie Production will engage in sales for 
    resale of gas acquired pursuant to the transferred gas purchase 
    contracts under a blanket marketing certificate subject to the terms 
    and conditions set forth in Subpart L of Part 284 of the Commission's 
    regulations. Applicants further state that upon the effective date of 
    such transfers Carnegie Production will perform all the FERC 
    jurisdictional sales services currently being performed by CP&M and 
    CIPCO will request that the Commission delete its blanket certificate 
    for unbundled sales service issued pursuant to Subpart J of Part 284 
    and CIPCO will file to remove from its tariff, Rate Schedules FMS and 
    IMS, its merchant service.
        Comment date: August 1, 1996, in accordance with Standard Paragraph 
    F at the end of this notice.
    
    3. Koch Gateway Pipeline Company and Southern Natural Gas Company
    
    [Docket No. CP96-619-000]
    
        Take notice that on July 3, 1996, Koch Gateway Pipeline Company 
    (Koch), P. O. Box 1478, Houston, Texas 77521-1478 and Southern Natural 
    Gas Company (Southern), P. O. Box 2563, Birmingham, Alabama 35202-2563, 
    filed in Docket No. CP96-619-000 an application pursuant to Section 
    7(b) of the Natural Gas Act and Section 157.18 of the Commission's 
    regulations for an order permitting and approving abandonment of an 
    exchange service. Koch and Southern state that this abandonment of 
    service is in the public
    
    [[Page 37463]]
    
    interest and will have no effect on any existing customer, all as more 
    fully set forth in the application which is on file with the Commission 
    and open for public inspection.
        Comment date: August 1, 1996, in accordance with Standard Paragraph 
    F at the end of this notice.
    
    4. Colorado Interstate Gas Company
    
    [Docket No. CP96-624-000]
    
        Take notice that, on July 5, 1996, Colorado Interstate Gas Company 
    (CIG), P. O. Box 1087, Colorado Springs, Colorado 80944, filed a 
    request, pursuant to its blanket certificate in Docket No. CP83-21-000 
    (21 FERC para. 62,403) and Sections 157.205 and 157.212 of the 
    Commission's Regulations, for authorization to construct new bi-
    directional delivery facilities so as to increase the capacity of its 
    Fort Lupton Meter Station (a.k.a. the Fort Lupton delivery point) to 
    200,000 Dth per day, in order to provide increased deliverability to 
    Public Service Company of Colorado (PSCo), all as more fully set forth 
    in the request, which is on file with the Commission and open to public 
    inspection.
        The Fort Lupton delivery point is located in Section 34, T2N, R66W, 
    in Weld County, Colorado. CIG states that it has sufficient capacity to 
    accomplish the increased deliveries without detriment or disadvantage 
    to its other customers. CIG also states that the deliveries through the 
    new Fort Lupton delivery point facilities will provide service to 
    PSCo's Fort Vrain power plant and other loads in the area, and will 
    enable PSCo to avoid the construction of approximately 50 miles of 20-
    inch pipeline to transport the gas it has stored in the Young Storage 
    Field. CIG further estimates that the new facilities will cost 
    approximately $68,000.
        Comment date: August 26, 1996, in accordance with Standard 
    Paragraph G at the end of this notice.
    
    5. Algonquin Gas Transmission Company
    
    [Docket No. CP96-625-000]
    
        Take notice that on July 5, 1996, Algonquin Gas Transmission 
    Company (Algonquin), 1284 Soldiers Field Road, Boston, Massachusetts 
    02135, filed in Docket No. CP96-625-000 a request pursuant to Sections 
    157.205 and 157.212 of the Commission's Regulations under the Natural 
    Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205 and 157.212) for authorization to construct and 
    operate certain facilities in connection with establishing a new 
    delivery point for Connecticut Natural Gas Corporation (Connecticut), 
    under the blanket certificate issued in Docket No. CP87-317-000, 
    pursuant to Section 7(c) of the Natural Gas Act, all as more fully set 
    forth in the request which is on file with the Commission and open to 
    public inspection.
        Algonquin states that Connecticut has requested and Algonquin has 
    agreed to establish a new delivery point on land to be owned by 
    Connecticut adjacent to Algonquin's existing pipeline facilities in the 
    town of Hebron, Connecticut. Algonquin explains that it will construct 
    a new measuring station and associated auxiliary facilities at a cost 
    estimated to be $217,000; and that Connecticut will install 
    approximately 4,400 feet of 6-inch steel main. In addition, Algonquin 
    relates that Connecticut will pay all costs for the facilities 
    installed and will construct all non-jurisdictional facilities 
    downstream of those constructed by Algonquin. Algonquin says that the 
    metering and certain auxiliary piping will be constructed, owned, 
    operated, and maintained by Algonquin, while the meter station 
    building, regulators, heaters, and other remaining facilities will be 
    constructed, owned, operated and maintained by Connecticut. Algonquin 
    states that it does not propose to increase the Maximum Daily Delivery 
    obligation under firm service agreements between Algonquin and 
    Connecticut. Algonquin relates that Connecticut has requested a 
    transfer of 200 MMBtu per day under Rate Schedule AFT-1 (F-4) of its 
    entitlement for firm service from an existing delivery point at 
    Mansfield, Connecticut to the proposed Hebron delivery point. Algonquin 
    states that its peak day or annual commitments under firm service 
    agreements will not be adversely affected by construction of the new 
    station.
        Algonquin states that its existing tariff does not prohibit the 
    addition of new delivery points. In addition, Algonquin states that it 
    has sufficient capacity to accomplish the instant proposal without 
    detriment or disadvantage to Algonquin's other firm customers.
        Comment date: August 26, 1996, in accordance with Standard 
    Paragraph G at the end of this notice.
    
    Standard Paragraphs
    
        F. Any person desiring to be heard or make any protest with 
    reference to said filing should on or before the comment date file with 
    the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
    Washington, D.C. 20426, a motion to intervene or a protest in 
    accordance with the requirements of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
    and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) and the Regulations under 
    the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.10). All protests filed with the 
    Commission will be considered by it in determining the appropriate 
    action to be taken but will not serve to make the protestants parties 
    to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party to a proceeding 
    or to participate as a party in any hearing therein must file a motion 
    to intervene in accordance with the Commission's Rules.
        Take further notice that, pursuant to the authority contained in 
    and subject to jurisdiction conferred upon the Federal Energy 
    Regulatory Commission by Sections 7 and 15 of the Natural Gas Act and 
    the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, a hearing will be 
    held without further notice before the Commission or its designee on 
    this filing if no motion to intervene is filed within the time required 
    herein, if the Commission on its own review of the matter finds that a 
    grant of the certificate is required by the public convenience and 
    necessity. If a motion for leave to intervene is timely filed, or if 
    the Commission on its own motion believes that a formal hearing is 
    required, further notice of such hearing will be duly given.
        Under the procedure herein provided for, unless otherwise advised, 
    it will be unnecessary for the applicant to appear or be represented at 
    the hearing.
        G. Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 45 days after 
    the issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to 
    Rule 214 of the Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion 
    to intervene or notice of intervention and pursuant to Section 157.205 
    of the Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205) a protest 
    to the request. If no protest is filed within the time allowed 
    therefore, the proposed activity shall be deemed to be authorized 
    effective the day after the time allowed for filing a protest. If a 
    protest is filed and not withdrawn within 30 days after the time 
    allowed for filing a protest, the instant request shall be treated as 
    an application for authorization pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural 
    Gas Act.
    Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
    Acting Secretary.
    [FR Doc. 96-18207 Filed 7-17-96; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
07/18/1996
Department:
Energy Department
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
96-18207
Dates:
August 1, 1996, in accordance with the first paragraph of Standard Paragraph F at the end of this notice.
Pages:
37462-37463 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. CP96-386-001, et al.
PDF File:
96-18207.pdf