95-17772. Denial of Petition for Rulemaking; Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards  

  • [Federal Register Volume 60, Number 138 (Wednesday, July 19, 1995)]
    [Proposed Rules]
    [Pages 37042-37043]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 95-17772]
    
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    
    National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
    
    49 CFR Part 571
    
    
    Denial of Petition for Rulemaking; Federal Motor Vehicle Safety 
    Standards
    
    AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), 
    Department of Transportation.
    
    ACTION: Denial of petition for rulemaking.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This document denies Mr. John Chevedden's petition for 
    rulemaking to specify the rear license plate mounting location of 
    certain trucks. NHTSA's analysis of the petition concludes that this 
    action would have a negligible effect on reducing crashes or fatalities 
    and that to conduct any more than a cursory technical review would use 
    public resources inappropriately.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Richard Van Iderstine, Office of 
    Rulemaking, NHTSA, 400 Seventh Street, SW, Washington, DC 20590. Mr. 
    Van Iderstine's telephone number is: (202) 366-5275. His facsimile 
    number is (202) 366-4329.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: By letter dated May 31, 1995, Mr. John 
    Chevedden petitioned the agency to issue a rule applicable to new 
    trucks with off-center rear license plates. Mr. Chevedden asked NHTSA 
    to mandate that those license plates be positioned on the driver's 
    side. Mr. Chevedden stated that the rulemaking was needed because it is 
    a safety enhancement that will prevent death, injury and property 
    damage. Mr. Chevedden speculates that a reflectorized license plate 
    mounted on the driver's side, instead of the passenger side, will serve 
    as a back-up reflector and safety warning in many cases where the 
    vehicle's rear lights are not operating. He stated that the driver's 
    side mounting would be more useful than the passenger side location in 
    
    [[Page 37043]]
    marking the edge of the vehicle closest to the roadway.
        In a recent denial of a petition from Mr. Chevedden requesting a 
    similar requirement for front license plates (60 FR 19716) the agency 
    estimated that if it were to specify that those vehicles with off-
    center front license plates have their front plates located on the 
    driver's side, the number of lives saved would not exceed one life for 
    every 588 years.
        This petition applies only to light trucks which are about half of 
    the new vehicle population, making the possibility of benefit about 
    half that of the previous petition. Additionally, while all vehicles 
    have rear license plates and not all have front plates, all vehicles 
    also have two rear red reflex reflectors. Thus, any benefit associated 
    with the possibility of having more vehicles with driver-side plates, 
    would be overshadowed because the effectiveness of such a treatment is 
    dwarfed by the effectiveness of the reflectors already present on the 
    vehicles.
        Based on that recent analysis and these facts, the agency believes 
    that the benefit from Mr. Chevedden's new petition would be smaller 
    than his previous petition.
        In accordance with 49 CFR part 552, this completes the agency's 
    technical review of the petition. The agency has concluded that there 
    is no reasonable possibility that the amendment requested by the 
    petitioner would be issued at the conclusion of a rulemaking 
    proceeding. The agency notes that the petition is basically repetitive 
    of an earlier petition. After considering all relevant factors, 
    including the need to allocate and prioritize limited agency resources 
    to best accomplish the agency's safety mission, the agency has decided 
    to deny the petition.
    
        Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30103, 30162; delegation of authority at 49 
    CFR 1.50 and 501.8.
    
        Issued on: July 13, 1995.
    Barry Felrice,
    Associate Administrator for Safety Performance Standards.
    [FR Doc. 95-17772 Filed 7-18-95; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-59-P
    
    

Document Information

Published:
07/19/1995
Department:
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
Entry Type:
Proposed Rule
Action:
Denial of petition for rulemaking.
Document Number:
95-17772
Pages:
37042-37043 (2 pages)
PDF File:
95-17772.pdf
CFR: (1)
49 CFR 571