96-18135. Use of ``Made in'' and ``Assembled in'' in One Country of Origin Marking Statement  

  • [Federal Register Volume 61, Number 140 (Friday, July 19, 1996)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 37678-37679]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 96-18135]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
    
    Customs Service
    
    19 CFR Part 134
    
    
    Use of ``Made in'' and ``Assembled in'' in One Country of Origin 
    Marking Statement
    
    AGENCY: U.S. Customs Service, Department of the Treasury.
    
    ACTION: General marking exception.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This document advises the public of a general country of 
    origin marking exception that will be granted by Customs, commencing 
    August 5, 1996, for three months for imported foreign articles which 
    reach the ultimate purchaser in the United States containing a marking 
    with the words ``Made in,'' ``Product of,'' or words of similar 
    meaning, such as ``Knit in,'' along with the use of ``Assembled in'' in 
    a single country of origin marking statement.
    
    EFFECTIVE DATE: August 5, 1996, through November 5, 1996.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Monika Rice, Special Classification 
    and Marking Branch, Office of Regulations and Rulings (202-482-6980).
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    Background
    
        Section 304 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1304), 
    provides that, unless excepted, every article of foreign origin (or its 
    container) imported into the U.S. shall be marked in a conspicuous 
    place as legibly, indelibly, and permanently as the nature of the 
    article (or its container) will permit, in such a manner as to indicate 
    to the ultimate purchaser in the U.S. the English name of the country 
    of origin of the article. Part 134, Customs Regulations (19 CFR Part 
    134), implements the country of origin marking requirements and 
    exceptions of 19 U.S.C. 1304.
        Customs previously has determined that the use of ``Made in,'' 
    ``Product of,'' or words of similar meaning, such as ``Knit in'' (when 
    the country of origin was the country in which an article was knit to 
    shape), along with the use of the words ``Assembled in'' in a single 
    country of origin marking statement, was acceptable for purposes of 19 
    U.S.C. 1304. These prior determinations were based upon Customs 
    position that the words, ``Assembled in'' were not a country of origin 
    marking indicator, except as provided for in 19 CFR 10.22 for articles 
    eligible for subheading 9802.00.80, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 
    United States (HTSUS), treatment.
    
    [[Page 37679]]
    
    See Headquarters Ruling Letter (HRL) 087271 dated January 17, 1991, 
    (the expressions ``Made in China, Assembled in Hong Kong'' or ``Knit in 
    China, Assembled in Hong Kong'' were acceptable under 19 U.S.C. 1304 
    and 19 CFR 134.46 indicating that the country of origin of sweaters was 
    China). But see HRL 733564 dated August 10, 1990 (the marking ``Made in 
    Canada'' needed to be removed from hoses manufactured in Canada, after 
    assembly with brass fittings in Mexico, as the country of origin of the 
    assembled article was Mexico pursuant to 19 CFR 10.22 and the article 
    could be marked ``Assembled in Mexico'').
        Due to the confusion generated by 19 CFR 10.22 concerning when it 
    is acceptable to use the words ``Assembled in,'' in country of origin 
    marking, this section, effective August 5, 1996, will be removed from 
    the Customs Regulations as part of a final document which principally 
    implemented Annex 311 of the North American Free Trade Agreement (T.D. 
    96-48, 61 FR 28932, 28955, June 6, 1996). That final rule document also 
    included an amendment to 19 CFR 134.43(e) to provide for the use of the 
    phrases, ``Assembled in (country of final assembly),'' ``Assembled in 
    (country of final assembly) from components of (name of country or 
    countries of origin of all components),'' or ``Made in, or product of, 
    (country of final assembly),'' as methods of marking an imported 
    article when the country of origin of such article is determined to be 
    the country in which it was finally assembled.
        Accordingly, for all goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 
    for consumption on or after August 5, 1996, the country of origin 
    indicator, ``Assembled in,'' may be used for the marking of imported 
    articles only when the country of origin of that article is determined 
    to be the country in which the article was finally assembled. Whether 
    or not the article is eligible for entry under subheading 9802.00.80, 
    HTSUS, will not be relevant to the use of this marking.
        Furthermore, as a result of the amendment of 19 CFR 134.43(e), the 
    terms ``Made in'' and ``Assembled in'' are always words of similar 
    meaning, and it will no longer be acceptable to use ``Made in,'' 
    ``Product of,'' or words of similar meaning, along with the words 
    ``Assembled in'' in a single country of origin marking statement on 
    articles of foreign origin imported into the United States.
        However, the marking statute and regulations allow for exceptions 
    to the marking requirements under certain circumstances. One of these 
    exceptions concerns articles which cannot be marked prior to, or after, 
    importation except at an expense that would be economically 
    prohibitive. See 19 U.S.C. 1304(a)(3) (C) and (K), and 19 CFR 134.32 
    (c) and (o).
        In consideration of: (1) the fact that the use of ``Made in,'' 
    ``Product of,'' or words of similar meaning, along with the use of the 
    words ``Assembled in'' in a single country of origin marking statement 
    has been acceptable until the amendment of 19 CFR 134.43(e), and many 
    articles or labels containing such statements may have already been 
    made; (2) the expectation that many individual requests will be 
    received for marking exceptions on the ground of economic 
    prohibitiveness; and (3) the importance of providing uniform Customs 
    treatment, Headquarters has made a general finding under these 
    circumstances that it would be economically prohibitive to require the 
    marking of imported foreign articles (either before or after 
    importation) in compliance with 19 CFR 134.43(e), as amended, as of the 
    effective date of the new regulations. This general marking exception 
    shall be granted for all imported foreign articles marked ``Made in,'' 
    ``Product of,'' or words of similar meaning, such as ``Knit in,'' along 
    with the use of the words ``Assembled in'' in a single country of 
    origin marking statement, for a period not to exceed three (3) months 
    from the effective date of 19 CFR 134.43(e), as amended, (i.e., no 
    later than November 5, 1996), which Customs views as a reasonable 
    period of time for the exhaustion of existing inventory. Please note 
    that, if information is obtained that the above articles or labels were 
    made after August 5, 1996, this general marking exception will not 
    apply.
    
        Dated: July 11, 1996.
    Stuart P. Seidel,
    Assistant Commissioner, Office of Regulations and Rulings.
    [FR Doc. 96-18135 Filed 7-18-96; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4820-02-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
07/19/1996
Department:
Customs Service
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
General marking exception.
Document Number:
96-18135
Dates:
August 5, 1996, through November 5, 1996.
Pages:
37678-37679 (2 pages)
PDF File:
96-18135.pdf
CFR: (1)
19 CFR 134