99-18378. Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program; Clarification of the Nature of Required CDBG Expenditure Documentation  

  • [Federal Register Volume 64, Number 137 (Monday, July 19, 1999)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 38812-38813]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 99-18378]
    
    
          
    
    [[Page 38811]]
    
    _______________________________________________________________________
    
    Part VI
    
    
    
    
    
    Department of Housing and Urban Development
    
    
    
    
    
    _______________________________________________________________________
    
    
    
    24 CFR Part 570
    
    
    
    Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program; Clarification of the 
    Nature of Required CDBG Exenditure Documentation; Final Rule
    
    Federal Register / Vol. 64, No. 137 / Monday, July 19, 1999 /  Rules 
    and Regulations
    
    [[Page 38812]]
    
    
    
    DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
    
    24 CFR Part 570
    
    [Docket No. FR-4449-I-01]
    RIN 2506-AC00
    
    
    Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program; Clarification 
    of the Nature of Required CDBG Expenditure Documentation
    
    AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and 
    Development, HUD.
    
    ACTION: Interim rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This rule clarifies the level of expenditure documentation 
    that is needed to meet the financial management requirement that 
    grantees and subrecipients maintain adequate records to identify the 
    use of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds provided for 
    assisted activities. This change will provide the public with more 
    assurance that CDBG funds are used only for allowable purposes.
    
    DATES: Effective Date: August 18, 1999.
        Comments Due Date: September 17, 1999.
    
    ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit comments regarding 
    this rule to the Rules Docket Clerk, Regulations Division, Office of 
    the General Counsel, Room 10276, Department of Housing & Urban 
    Development, 451 Seventh Street, SW, Washington, DC 20410-8000. 
    Communications should refer to the above docket number and title. A 
    copy of each communication submitted will be available for public 
    inspection and copying between 7:30 a.m. and 5:30 p.m. weekdays at the 
    above address. Facsimile (fax) comments will not be accepted.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sue Miller, Entitlement Communities 
    Division, Office of Community Planning and Development, Department of 
    Housing and Urban Development, 451 Seventh Street, SW, Washington, DC 
    20410, telephone (202) 708-1577. Persons with hearing or speech-
    impairments may call 1-800-877-8339 (Federal Information Relay Service 
    TTY). (Other than the ``800'' number, these are not toll-free numbers.)
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    Paperwork Reduction Act Statement
    
        The information collection requirements contained in this rule have 
    been approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) in 
    accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
    3520), and assigned OMB control number 2506-0077. An agency may not 
    conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a 
    collection of information unless the collection displays a valid 
    control number.
    
    Background
    
        The Office of Inspector General (OIG) audits have found various 
    cases in which grantees and subrecipients were not maintaining 
    sufficient documentation to clearly identify the actual use of 
    Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds provided to assisted 
    projects. This issue has particularly arisen in regard to special 
    economic development activities where the funds are ultimately expended 
    by for-profit businesses. Such lack of appropriate documentation 
    increases the potential for misuse of CDBG funds. This rule clarifies 
    the level of documentation that is needed for grantees and 
    subrecipients to demonstrate compliance with the existing financial 
    management requirements in 24 CFR parts 84 and 85 relating to 
    maintaining adequate records to identify the use of funds provided for 
    assisted activities. This change will provide the public with more 
    assurance that CDBG funds are used only for allowable purposes.
        OMB Uniform Administrative Requirements for grants to local 
    governments and nonprofit organizations have long required that 
    grantees and subrecipients maintain records which adequately identify 
    the source and application of funds provided for financially-assisted 
    activities. This requirement is found at Sec. 85.20(b)(2) for local 
    governments and at Sec. 84.21(b)(2) for nonprofit organizations. These 
    requirements are specifically made applicable to the CDBG program by 
    Secs. 570.502(a)(4) and (b)(3), respectively. The CDBG regulations at 
    Sec. 570.506(h) also require maintaining financial records in 
    accordance with the applicable requirements listed in Sec. 570.502.
        Most grantees and subrecipients comply satisfactorily with the 
    subject requirement, particularly for those activities that the grantee 
    and/or subrecipient directly implements or for which it procures goods 
    or services. Problems are most likely to occur in instances where the 
    grantee and/or subrecipient provides CDBG financial assistance to an 
    entity that is neither a contractor nor a subrecipient, but rather 
    possesses characteristics of a ``beneficiary.'' Such entities carry out 
    assisted activities directly and are not subject to the provisions of 
    24 CFR part 84 or part 85.
        A common example of these latter type of assisted activities is 
    that of a grantee making a CDBG economic development loan to a for-
    profit business to carry out an economic development project. The 
    private business is then generally responsible for all direct 
    implementation actions and is not governed by the OMB uniform 
    administrative requirements. The grantee must thus exercise due 
    diligence in obtaining documentation from the business to support the 
    use of CDBG funds in order to ensure that the grantee is in compliance 
    with its responsibilities under the uniform administrative requirements 
    which only allow costs that are necessary, reasonable, and adequately 
    supported to be charged to the CDBG program.
        In the example case, the grantee's records relating to its review 
    and approval of the business' loan application are not sufficient to 
    provide the adequate documentation of the ``application of funds'' 
    required by Sec. 85.20(b)(2). The grantee's loan agreement with the 
    business and related security filings, while important, are also not in 
    themselves adequate to document the actual use of the funds. The 
    grantee must have records to support the scope of the activity that is 
    actually accomplished and to clearly demonstrate how the CDBG funds 
    were used to assist the activity.
        This interim rule amends 24 CFR 570.506(h) to clarify the extent of 
    documentation needed to meet the financial management requirement that 
    grantees and subrecipients maintain adequate records to identify the 
    use of funds provided for assisted activities. A broad range of types 
    of documentation is described in an effort to reflect the myriad of 
    different activities and financing mechanisms that can be undertaken 
    with CDBG funds. Comment on this method of addressing the issue of 
    adequate financial support documentation is welcome.
    
    Justification for Interim Rulemaking
    
        In general, the Department publishes a rule for public comment 
    before issuing a rule for effect, in accordance with its own 
    regulations on rulemaking at 24 CFR part 10. Part 10, however, does 
    provide in Sec. 10.1 for exceptions from that general rule where the 
    Department finds good cause to omit advance notice and public 
    participation. The good cause requirement is satisfied when the prior 
    public procedure is ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the 
    public interest.''
    
    [[Page 38813]]
    
        The Department finds that good cause exists to publish this interim 
    rule for effect without first soliciting public comment because this 
    rule clarifies requirements already in place for grantees and 
    subrecipients. In consideration of this fact, advance public comment 
    was determined not necessary, but HUD welcomes comments from the public 
    and is soliciting comment on this rule.
    
    Findings and Certifications
    
    Regulatory Flexibility Act
    
        The Secretary, in accordance with the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 
    U.S.C. 605(b)), has reviewed and approved this interim rule, and in so 
    doing certifies that this rule will not have a substantial economic 
    impact on small entities. This interim rule will have no economic 
    impact on small entities since it is a clarification of existing 
    policy. Notwithstanding HUD's determination regarding small entities, 
    HUD specifically invites comments regarding alternatives to this rule 
    that would meet HUD's objectives as described in this preamble.
    
    Environmental Impact
    
        This amendment is categorically excluded from environmental review 
    under the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4321). In 
    keeping with the exclusion provided for in 24 CFR 50.19(c)(1), this 
    amendment does not direct, provide for assistance or loan and mortgage 
    insurance for, or otherwise govern or regulate, real property 
    acquisition, disposition, leasing, rehabilitation, alteration, 
    demolition, or new construction; or establish, revise, or provide for 
    standards for construction or construction materials, manufactured 
    housing, or occupancy. Accordingly, under 24 CFR 50.19(c)(2), this 
    amendment is categorically excluded because it amends an existing 
    document where the existing document as a whole would not fall under 
    the exclusion in 24 CFR 50.19 (c)(1), but the amendment by itself would 
    do so.
    
    Executive Order 12612, Federalism
    
        The General Counsel, as the Designated Official under section 6(a) 
    of Executive Order 12612, Federalism, has determined that this interim 
    rule will not have substantial direct effects on States or their 
    political subdivisions, or the relationship between the Federal 
    Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and 
    responsibilities among the various levels of government. The 
    clarification resulting from this interim rule will not affect the 
    relationship between the Federal Government and State and local 
    governments.
    
    Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
    
        The Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance numbers for the 
    Community Development Block Grants program are 14.218, 14.219, 14.225, 
    14.227, 14.246, and 14.248.
    
    List of Subjects in 24 CFR Part 570
    
        Administrative practice and procedure, American Samoa, Community 
    development block grants, Grant programs--education, Grant programs--
    housing and community development, Guam, Indians, Lead poisoning, Loan 
    programs--housing and community development, Low and moderate income 
    housing, New communities, Northern Mariana Islands, Pacific Islands 
    Trust Territory, Pockets of poverty, Puerto Rico, Reporting and 
    recordkeeping requirements, Small cities, Student aid, Virgin Islands.
        Accordingly, 24 CFR part 570 is amended as follows:
    
    PART 570--COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANTS
    
        1. The authority citation for part 570 continues to read as 
    follows:
    
        Authority: 42 U.S.C. 3535(d) and 5300-5320.
    
        2. Section 570.506 is amended by revising paragraph (h) to read as 
    follows:
    
    
    Sec. 570.506  Records to be maintained.
    
    * * * * *
        (h) Financial records, in accordance with the applicable 
    requirements listed in Sec. 570.502, including source documentation for 
    entities not subject to parts 84 and 85 of this title. Grantees shall 
    maintain evidence to support how the CDBG funds provided to such 
    entities are expended. Such documentation must include, to the extent 
    applicable, invoices, schedules containing comparisons of budgeted 
    amounts and actual expenditures, construction progress schedules signed 
    by appropriate parties (e.g., general contractor and/or a project 
    architect), and/or other documentation appropriate to the nature of the 
    activity.
    * * * * *
        Dated: June 16, 1999.
    Cardell Cooper,
    Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and Development.
    [FR Doc. 99-18378 Filed 7-16-99; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4210-29-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
07/19/1999
Department:
Housing and Urban Development Department
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Interim rule.
Document Number:
99-18378
Pages:
38812-38813 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. FR-4449-I-01
RINs:
2506-AC00: Community Development Block Grant Program; Clarification of the Nature of Required CDBG Expenditure Documentation (FR-4449)
RIN Links:
https://www.federalregister.gov/regulations/2506-AC00/community-development-block-grant-program-clarification-of-the-nature-of-required-cdbg-expenditure-d
PDF File:
99-18378.pdf
CFR: (2)
24 CFR 570.506(h)
24 CFR 570.506