[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 127 (Wednesday, July 2, 1997)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 35702-35703]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-17259]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. 97-CE-24-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Partenavia Costruzioni Aeronauticas,
S.p.A. Models AP68TP 300 ``Spartacus'' and AP68TP 600 ``Viator''
Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document proposes to adopt a new airworthiness directive
(AD) that would apply to all Partenavia Costruzioni Aeronautiche,
S.p.A. (Partenavia) Models AP68TP 300 ``Spartacus'' and AP68TP 600
``Viator'' airplanes. The proposed AD would require amending the
Limitations Section of the airplane flight manual (AFM) to prohibit the
positioning of the power levers below the flight idle stop while the
airplane is in flight. This amendment would include a statement of
consequences if the limitation is not followed. The proposed AD is a
result of numerous incidents and five documented accidents involving
airplanes equipped with turboprop engines where the propeller beta was
improperly utilized during flight. The actions specified by the
proposed AD are intended to prevent loss of airplane control or engine
overspeed with consequent loss of engine power caused by the power
levers being positioned below the flight idle stop while the airplane
is in flight.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before September 2, 1997.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments in triplicate to the Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Central Region, Office of the Assistant Chief
Counsel, Attention: Rules Docket No. 97-CE-24-AD, Room 1558, 601 E.
12th Street, Kansas City, Missouri 64106. Comments may be inspected at
this location between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday,
holidays excepted.
Information related to the proposed AD may be examined at the Rules
Docket at the address above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: J. Mike Kiesov, Aerospace Engineer,
Small Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1201 Walnut, suite 900, Kansas City,
Missouri 64106; telephone (816) 426-6934; facsimile (816) 426-2169.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
Interested persons are invited to participate in the making of the
proposed rule by submitting such written data, views, or arguments as
they may desire. Communications should identify the Rules Docket number
and be submitted in triplicate to the address specified above. All
communications received on or before the closing date for comments,
specified above, will be considered before taking action on the
proposed rule. The proposals contained in this notice may be changed in
light of the comments received.
Comments are specifically invited on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the proposed rule. All
comments submitted will be available, both before and after the closing
date for comments, in the Rules Docket for examination by interested
persons. A report that summarizes each FAA-public contact concerned
with the substance of this proposal will be filed in the Rules Docket.
Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments
submitted in response to this notice must submit a self-addressed,
stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments
to Docket No. 97-CE-24-AD.'' The postcard will be date stamped and
returned to the commenter.
Availability of NPRMs
Any person may obtain a copy of this NPRM by submitting a request
to the FAA, Central Region, Office of the Assistant Chief Counsel,
Attention: Rules Docket No. 97-CE-24-AD, Room 1558, 601 E. 12th Street,
Kansas City, Missouri 64106.
Discussion
The FAA has received reports of 14 occurrences in recent years of
incidents or accidents on airplanes equipped with turboprop engines
related to intentional or inadvertent operation of the propellers in
the beta range during flight. Beta is the range of propeller operation
intended for use during taxi, ground idle, or reverse operations as
controlled by the power lever settings aft of the flight idle stop.
Of the 14 documented in-flight beta occurrences, five were
classified as accidents. In-flight beta operation results that preceded
the accidents can be classified in one of two categories: (1) Permanent
engine damage and total loss of thrust on all engines when the
propeller that was operating in the beta range drove the engines to
overspeed; and (2) loss of airplane control because at least one
propeller operated in the beta range during flight.
The most recent accident occurred when both engines of a Saab Model
340B permanently lost power after eight seconds of beta range propeller
operation. The propellers consequently drove the engines into
overspeed, which resulted in internal engine failure.
Communication between the FAA and the public during a meeting held
on June 11-12, 1996, in Seattle, Washington, revealed a lack of
consistency of the information on in-flight beta operation contained in
the airplane flight manual (AFM) for airplanes not certificated for in-
flight operation with the power levers below the flight idle stop.
Airplanes that are certificated for this type of operation are not
affected by the above-referenced conditions.
The FAA's Determination
After examining the circumstances and reviewing all available
information related to the incidents and accidents referenced above,
the FAA has determined that:
All airplanes equipped with turboprop engines (provided
the airplane is not certificated for in-flight operation with the power
levers below the flight idle stop) should have information in the
Limitations Section of the AFM that prohibits positioning of power
levers below the flight idle stop while the airplane is in flight,
including a statement of consequence if the limitation is not followed;
and
Because Partenavia Models AP68TP 300 ``Spartacus'' and
AP68TP 600 ``Viator'' airplanes are equipped with turboprop engines,
are not certificated for in-flight operation with the power levers
below the flight idle stop, and do not contain information in the
Limitations Section of the AFM that prohibits and explains the
consequences of such operation, AD action should be taken. The proposed
AD is intended to prevent loss of airplane control or engine overspeed
with consequent loss of engine power caused by the power levers being
positioned below the flight idle stop while the airplane is in flight.
Explanation of the Provisions of the Proposed AD
Since an unsafe condition has been identified that is likely to
exist or
[[Page 35703]]
develop in Partenavia Models AP68TP 300 ``Spartacus'' and AP68TP 600
``Viator'' airplanes of the same type design, the proposed AD would
require amending the Limitations Section of the AFM to prohibit the
positioning of the power levers below the flight idle stop while the
airplane is in flight, including a statement of consequences if the
limitation is not followed. This AFM amendment shall consist of the
following language:
Positioning of power levers below the flight idle stop while the
airplane is in flight is prohibited. Such positioning may lead to
loss of airplane control or may result in an overspeed condition and
consequent loss of engine power.
Possible Alternative to the Proposed AD
Partenavia is determining whether it will develop AFM revisions for
the affected airplanes. If Partenavia does develop AFM revisions and
they are completed and approved by the FAA prior to issuance of the
final rule, then incorporating these revisions into the AFM will be
included as a method of complying with the AD.
Compliance Time of the Proposed AD
The FAA has determined that the compliance time of the proposed AD
should be specified in calendar time instead of hours time-in-service.
While the condition addressed by the proposed AD is unsafe while the
airplane is in flight, the condition is not a result of repetitive
airplane operation; the potential of the unsafe condition occurring is
the same on the first flight as it is for subsequent flights. The
proposed compliance time of ``30 days after the effective date of this
AD'' would not inadvertently ground airplanes and would assure that all
owners/operators of the affected airplanes accomplish the proposed
action in a reasonable time period.
Cost Impact
The FAA estimates that 5 airplanes in the U.S. registry would be
affected by the proposed AD, that it would take approximately 1
workhour per airplane to incorporate the proposed AFM amendment, and
that the average labor rate is approximately $60 an hour. Since an
owner/operator who holds at least a private pilot's certificate as
authorized by sections 43.7 and 43.11 of the Federal Aviation
Regulations (14 CFR 43.7 and 43.11) can accomplish the proposed action,
the only cost impact upon the public is the time it would take the
affected airplane owner/operators to amend the AFM.
Regulatory Impact
The regulations proposed herein would not have substantial direct
effects on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in
accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this
proposal would not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant
the preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is
not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866;
(2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) if promulgated,
will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a
substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act. A copy of the draft regulatory evaluation
prepared for this action has been placed in the Rules Docket. A copy of
it may be obtained by contacting the Rules Docket at the location
provided under the caption ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration proposes to amend
part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as
follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
Section 39.13 is amended by adding a new airworthiness directive
(AD) to read as follows:
Partenavia Costruzioni Aeronauticas, S.P.A.: Docket No. 97-CE-24-AD.
Applicability: Models AP68TP 300 ``Spartacus'' and AP68TP 600
``Viator'' airplanes, all serial numbers, certificated in any
category.
Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the
preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been
modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the
requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified,
altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of
this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an
alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (e) of
this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of
the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition
addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been
eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to
address it.
Compliance: Required within the next 30 days after the effective
date of this AD, unless already accomplished.
To prevent loss of airplane control or engine overspeed with
consequent loss of engine power caused by the power levers being
positioned below the flight idle stop while the airplane is in
flight, accomplish the following:
(a) Amend the Limitations Section of the airplane flight manual
(AFM) by inserting the following language:
``Positioning of power levers below the flight idle stop while
the airplane is in flight is prohibited. Such positioning may lead
to loss of airplane control or may result in an overspeed condition
and consequent loss of engine power.''
(b) This action may be accomplished by incorporating a copy of
this AD into the Limitations Section of the AFM.
(c) Amending the AFM, as required by this AD, may be performed
by the owner/operator holding at least a private pilot certificate
as authorized by section 43.7 of the Federal Aviation Regulations
(14 CFR 43.7), and must be entered into the aircraft records showing
compliance with this AD in accordance with section 43.11 of the
Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 43.11).
(d) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with
sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14
CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where
the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
(e) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the
compliance time that provides an equivalent level of safety may be
approved by the Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1201
Walnut, Kansas City, Missouri 64106. The request shall be forwarded
through an appropriate FAA Maintenance Inspector, who may add
comments and then send it to the Manager, Small Airplane
Directorate.
Note 2: Information concerning the existence of approved
alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be
obtained from the Small Airplane Directorate.
(f) Information related to this AD may be examined at the FAA,
Central Region, Office of the Assistant Chief Counsel, Room 1558,
601 E. 12th Street, Kansas City, Missouri 64106.
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on June 25, 1997.
James E. Jackson,
Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 97-17259 Filed 7-1-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-U
