95-17505. Food Labeling: Health Claims; Sugar Alcohols and Dental Caries  

  • [Federal Register Volume 60, Number 139 (Thursday, July 20, 1995)]
    [Proposed Rules]
    [Pages 37507-37549]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 95-17505]
    
    
    
    
    Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 139 / Thursday, July 20, 1995 / 
    Proposed Rules
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    [[Page 37507]]
    
    
    DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
    
    Food and Drug Administration
    
    21 CFR PART 101
    
    [Docket No. 95P-0003]
    
    
    Food Labeling: Health Claims; Sugar Alcohols and Dental Caries
    
    AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
    
    ACTION: Proposed rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is proposing to 
    authorize the use, on food labels and in food labeling, of health 
    claims on the association between sugar alcohols and the nonpromotion 
    of dental caries. In addition, FDA is proposing to exempt sugar 
    alcohol-containing foods from certain provisions of the health claims 
    general requirements regulation. FDA is proposing these actions in 
    response to a petition filed by the National Association of Chewing Gum 
    Manufacturers, Inc., and an ad hoc working group of sugar alcohol 
    manufacturers (hereinafter referred to as the petitioners).
    
    DATES: Written comments by October 3, 1995. The agency is proposing 
    that any final rule that may issue based upon this proposal become 
    effective 30 days following its publication.
    
    ADDRESSES: Written comments to the Dockets Management Branch (HFA-305), 
    Food and Drug Administration, rm. 1-23, 12420 Parklawn Dr., Rockville, 
    MD 20857.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joyce J. Saltsman, Center for Food 
    Safety and Applied Nutrition (HFS-165), Food and Drug Administration, 
    200 C St. SW., Washington, DC 20204, 202-205-5916.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    I. Background
    
    A. The Nutrition Labeling and Education Act of 1990
    
        On November 8, 1990, the President signed into law the Nutrition 
    Labeling and Education Act of 1990 (the 1990 amendments) (Pub. L. 101-
    535). This new law amended the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act 
    (the act) in a number of important ways. One of the most notable 
    aspects of the 1990 amendments was that they confirmed FDA's authority 
    to regulate health claims on food labels and in food labeling. As 
    amended by the 1990 amendments, section 403(r)(1)(B) of the act (21 
    U.S.C. 343(r)(1)(B)) provides that a product is misbranded if it bears 
    a claim that characterizes the relationship of a nutrient to a disease 
    or health-related condition, unless the claim is made in accordance 
    with the procedures and standards contained in regulations adopted by 
    FDA.
        Under section 403(r)(3)(B)(i) of the act, the Secretary of Health 
    and Human Services (and, by delegation, FDA) shall promulgate 
    regulations authorizing such claims only if he or she determines, based 
    on the totality of publicly available scientific evidence (including 
    evidence from well-designed studies conducted in a manner which is 
    consistent with generally recognized scientific procedures and 
    principles), that there is significant scientific agreement, among 
    experts qualified by scientific training and experience to evaluate 
    such claims, that the claim is supported by such evidence.
        Section 403(r)(3)(B)(ii) and (r)(3)(B)(iii) of the act describes 
    the information that must be included in any claim authorized under the 
    act. The act provides that the claim shall be an accurate 
    representation of the significance of the substance in affecting the 
    disease or health-related condition, and that it shall enable the 
    public to comprehend the information and understand its significance in 
    the context of the total daily diet. Finally, section 403(r)(4)(A)(i) 
    of the act provides that any person may petition FDA to issue a 
    regulation authorizing a health claim.
        The 1990 amendments, in addition to amending the act, directed FDA 
    to consider 10 substance-disease relationships as possible subjects of 
    health claims.
    
    B. FDA's Response
    
        In the Federal Register of January 6, 1993 (58 FR 2478), FDA 
    adopted a final rule that implemented the health claim provisions of 
    the act. In that final rule, FDA adopted Sec. 101.14 (21 CFR 101.14). 
    The regulation sets out the circumstances in which a substance is 
    eligible to be the subject of a health claim (Sec. 101.14(b)), adopts 
    the standard in section 403(r)(3)(B)(i) of the act as the standard that 
    the agency will apply in deciding whether to authorize a claim about a 
    substance-disease relationship (Sec. 101.14(c)), sets forth general 
    rules on how authorized claims are to be made in food labeling 
    (Sec. 101.14(d)), and establishes limitations on the circumstances in 
    which claims can be made (Sec. 101.14(e)). The agency also adopted 
    Sec. 101.70 (21 CFR 101.70), which establishes a process for 
    petitioning the agency to authorize health claims about a substance-
    disease relationship (Sec. 101.70(a)) and sets out the types of 
    information that any such petition must include (Sec. 101.70(d)). These 
    regulations became effective on May 8, 1993.
        In addition, FDA conducted an extensive review of the evidence on 
    the 10 substance-disease relationships listed in the 1990 amendments. 
    FDA has authorized claims that relate to 8 of these 10 relationships.
        The present rulemaking on sugar alcohols and dental caries 
    represents the first rulemaking that FDA has conducted in response to a 
    health claim petition.
    
    C. History of Sugar Alcohol Labeling
    
        In a set of findings of fact and a tentative order on label 
    statements for special dietary foods that the agency issued on July 19, 
    1977 (42 FR 37166), FDA addressed the issue of the use of the terms 
    ``sugar free,'' ``sugarless,'' and ``no sugar.'' The agency stated that 
    consumers may associate the absence of sugar in a product with weight 
    control and with foods that are low calorie or that have been altered 
    to reduce calories significantly. At that time, FDA viewed foods 
    intended to be useful in maintaining or reducing calorie intake or body 
    weight as foods for special dietary use, that is, as foods intended for 
    supplying particular dietary needs that exist by reason of a physical, 
    physiological, pathological, or other condition.
        Evidence had been introduced at a public hearing in the 1977 
    rulemaking to show that the ``sugarless'' claim is useful to identify 
    foods like chewing gum, which is in sustained contact with the teeth, 
    in which the use of a sweetener other than a fermentable or cariogenic 
    carbohydrate may not promote tooth decay. The secretary of the American 
    Dental Association's Council on Dental Therapeutics supported the 
    importance of advertising and labeling sugarless chewing gum and mints 
    as noncariogenic, in the sense that they did not contribute to the 
    development of dental caries (Ref. 80).
        In the final rule on label statements for special dietary foods 
    published in the Federal Register of September 22, 1978 (43 FR 43248), 
    FDA required a statement that a food is not low calorie or calorie 
    reduced (unless it is in fact, a low or reduced calorie food) when a 
    ``sugar free,'' ``sugarless,'' or ``no sugar'' claim is made for the 
    food. The agency decided to allow ``useful only in not promoting tooth 
    decay'' as an alternative statement to accompany such claims. The 
    agency stated that the statements that the food is not low calorie or 
    not useful for weight control, as well as ``useful only in not 
    promoting tooth decay,'' were needed because the 
    
    [[Page 37508]]
    term ``sugar free'' meant only that the food was sucrose free. A 
    ``sugar free'' food could contain other fermentable carbohydrates. 
    Thus, the information about the effect of sugar alcohol-containing 
    foods on the risk of developing dental caries was originally placed on 
    the food label primarily to clarify that the product was not 
    necessarily useful in weight control, not to highlight the effect of 
    sugar alcohol on dental caries production.
        In the Federal Register of November 27, 1991 (56 FR 60421), in 
    response to the 1990 amendments, FDA published a proposed rule entitled 
    ``Food Labeling: Nutrient Content Claims, General Principles, 
    Petitions, Definition of Terms'' (the nutrition labeling general 
    principles proposal). In that document, FDA recognized that 
    developments in nutrition science had established that the focus of 
    nutrient content claims for providing dietary guidance had shifted from 
    special populations with particular conditions to the general 
    population (see 56 FR 60421). Therefore, in the nutrition labeling 
    general principles proposal, FDA proposed to treat several claims that 
    had been subject to regulation in Sec. 105.66 (21 CFR 105.66) as 
    special dietary use claims as nutrient content claims for the general 
    population. To eliminate redundancy in the regulations and to conform 
    Sec. 105.66 to the 1990 amendments, FDA proposed to define these claims 
    in part 101 (21 CFR part 101) and to remove them from part 105 (21 CFR 
    part 105). Specifically, FDA proposed to adopt definitions for terms 
    such as ``low calorie'' and ``reduced calorie,'' for other comparative 
    calorie claims, and for sugar claims under section 403(r)(2) of the act 
    and to codify them in Sec. 101.60. It also proposed to delete these 
    claims from Sec. 105.66.
        In the Federal Register of January 6, 1993 (58 FR 2302), FDA 
    published its final rules on nutrient content claims. FDA adopted 
    definitions for claims for the calorie content of foods in Sec. 101.60 
    (58 FR 2302 at 2415). FDA defined claims regarding the sugars content 
    of a food, e.g., ``sugar free,'' ``free of sugar,'' ``no sugar,'' in 
    Sec. 101.60(c). In addition, FDA published a final rule that deleted 
    these claims from Sec. 105.66 (58 FR 2427).
        However, based on its consideration of comments on the use of the 
    statement ``useful only in not promoting tooth decay'' to qualify the 
    ``sugarless'' claim, FDA concluded that the statement was actually an 
    unauthorized health claim (58 FR 2302 at 2326). The claim is a health 
    claim because it characterizes the relationship of a substance (sugar 
    alcohols) to a disease (dental caries).
        In the nutrient content claim general principles proposal (56 FR 
    60421 at 60437), the agency stated that it intended to reevaluate the 
    usefulness of chewing gums sweetened with sugar alcohols in not 
    promoting tooth decay. The agency stated that the data supporting the 
    claim were over 20 years old and requested that new data be submitted 
    in accordance with the final rule on health messages. In the nutrient 
    content claim final rule, FDA stated that it had received data on the 
    validity of a claim about this nutrient-disease relationship, and that 
    it would make a determination on whether to authorize a claim in 
    accordance with the final rule on health claims (58 FR 2302 at 2326).
        On February 5, 1993, under the procedure established in section 
    701(e) of the act (21 U.S.C. 371(e)), a group of sugar alcohol 
    manufacturers submitted an objection to the revocation of 
    Sec. 105.66(f) (Ref. 2) and asked for a hearing on their objection. At 
    the same time, the group petitioned for reconsideration of the agency's 
    decision and for a stay of any administrative action by FDA pursuant to 
    the determination announced in the preamble of the nutrient content 
    claims rules that ``useful only in not promoting tooth decay'' is an 
    unauthorized health claim.
        Filing objections to the revocation of Sec. 105.66(f) stayed the 
    effect of the final rule as a matter of law. FDA's response to these 
    objections and to the petitions is set forth elsewhere in this issue of 
    the Federal Register.
        In the Federal Register of August 18, 1993 (58 FR 44036), FDA 
    published technical amendments to the health claim regulations in 
    response to comments that the agency received on the implementation 
    final rule that was published with the other final rules that responded 
    to the 1990 amendments in January of 1993 (see 58 FR 2066, August 18, 
    1993). One of the comments stated that if a petition were submitted for 
    the claim ``Useful Only in Not Promoting Tooth Decay,'' virtually none 
    of the sugar-free products on the market would be eligible to bear the 
    claim based on the requirements of a subsection of health claims 
    general principles regulation, Sec. 101.14(e)(6). FDA acknowledged that 
    certain food products of limited nutritional value that have been 
    specially formulated relative to a specific disease condition, such as 
    dental caries, may be determined to be appropriate foods to bear a 
    health claim (58 FR at 44036). The agency commented that it was its 
    intention to deal with such situations within the regulations 
    authorizing specific health claims. Therefore, FDA amended 
    Sec. 101.14(e)(6) to state that:
    
        Except for dietary supplements or where provided for in other 
    regulations in part 101, subpart E, the food contains 10 percent or 
    more of the Reference Daily Intake or the Daily Reference Value for 
    vitamin A, vitamin C, iron, calcium, protein, or fiber per reference 
    amount customarily consumed prior to any nutrient addition.
    
    II. Petition for the Noncariogenicity of Sugarless Food Products 
    Sweetened With Sugar Alcohol
    
    A. Background
    
        On August 31, 1994, the petitioners submitted a health claim 
    petition to FDA requesting that the agency authorize a health claim on 
    the relationship of sugar alcohols (i.e., xylitol, sorbitol, mannitol, 
    maltitol, lactitol, isomalt, hydrogenated starch hydrolysates, and 
    hydrogenated glucose syrups) in sugarless foods to dental caries (Ref. 
    1). On September 15, 1994, FDA sent the petitioners a letter stating 
    that study reports that are needed to support the petition, and that 
    are required for a health claim petition under Sec. 101.70, were not 
    included in the petitioners' submission. The agency stated that no 
    further action would be taken until that information was received (Ref. 
    3).
        On September 27, 1994, the petitioners filed an amendment to their 
    petition submitting the required information. On October 7, 1994, the 
    agency sent the petitioners a letter acknowledging receipt of the 
    additional information and stating that the agency had begun its 
    scientific review of the petition (Ref. 4).
        In this document, the agency will consider whether a health claim 
    on the relationship between sugar alcohols and dental caries is 
    justified under the standard in section 403(r)(3)(B)(i) of the act and 
    Sec. 101.14(c) of FDA's regulations. In addition, the agency will 
    consider the petitioners' request that the agency provide in any 
    regulation authorizing a claim that foods sweetened with sugar alcohols 
    be exempt from the requirement in Sec. 101.14(e)(6). The following is a 
    review of the health claim petition.
    
    B. Preliminary Requirements
    
    1. The Substances That Are the Subjects of the Petition
        Sugar alcohols are a class of organic compounds that contain chains 
    of carbon atoms that bear two or more hydroxyl groups and have only 
    hydroxyl functional groups (Ref. 1). The hydroxyl groups replace ketone 
    or aldehyde groups that are found in sugars (Sec. 101.9(c)(6)(iii)). 
    The specific sugar alcohols that are the subject of this petition are 
    xylitol, sorbitol, mannitol, 
    
    [[Page 37509]]
    maltitol, maltitol syrup, maltitol solution, isomalt, lactitol, and 
    mixtures of sugar alcohol substances, i.e., hydrogenated glucose syrup 
    (HGS) and hydrogenated starch hydrolysate (HSH) products.
        Xylitol is a monosaccharide polyhydric alcohol with a 5-carbon 
    backbone. It occurs naturally in fruits (e.g., plums, strawberries, and 
    raspberries) and vegetables (e.g., cauliflower and endive) (Refs. 82 
    and 83). Xylitol is made commercially by the hydrogenation of D-xylose.
        Sorbitol is a monosaccharide polyhydric alcohol with a 6-carbon 
    backbone. It is found naturally in many types of berries and fruits and 
    in seaweeds and algae (Ref. 82). Sorbitol is made by hydrogenation of 
    glucose.
        Mannitol is also a 6-carbon, monosaccharide polyhydric alcohol. It 
    occurs widely in nature in plants (e.g., pumpkins, mushrooms, onions, 
    beets, celery, and olives), algae, and fungi. Like sorbitol, mannitol 
    is made commercially by the hydrogenation of glucose.
        Maltitol is a disaccharide alcohol (4-D-glucopyranosyl-D-sorbitol) 
    with a 12-carbon backbone. It is produced commercially by hydrogenation 
    of maltose.
        Lactitol is also a disaccharide alcohol (-D-
    galactopyranosyl D-sorbitol) with a 12-carbon backbone. It is produced 
    by hydrogenation of lactose (Ref. 84).
        HSH and HGS are mixtures of sugar alcohols manufactured by 
    hydrogenation of corn starch or glucose syrups. The composition of the 
    sugar alcohols in the final product will depend on the manufacturing 
    process. Therefore, HSH and HGS products from different manufacturers 
    may contain different proportions of the same sugar alcohols. One HSH 
    product, under the trade name ``Lycasin,'' was first produced in Sweden 
    by hydrogenation of potato starch. The Swedish product contained a 
    mixture of sorbitol, maltitol, maltotrititol, and hydrogenated 
    dextrines of various molecular weights. When the manufacturing process 
    was moved to France in the 1970's, the production process was also 
    changed (Ref. 85). The French product, ``Lycasin 80/55,'' was made from 
    the hydrogenation of corn starch and contained 6 to 8 percent sorbitol, 
    50 to 55 percent hydrogenated disaccharides, 20 to 25 percent 
    trisaccharides, and 10 to 20 percent hydrogenated polysaccharides (Ref. 
    75). Lycasin 80/55, or HSH 80/55, is less fermentable and produces less 
    acid than the Swedish product (Ref. 85).
        Isomalt, also known by the commercial name ``Palatinit,'' is an 
    equimolar mixture of the disaccharide alcohols of -D-
    glucopyranosyl-D-sorbitol and -D-glucopyranosyl-D-mannitol. 
    It is produced by treating sucrose with enzymes, followed by 
    hydrogenation of the resulting mixture.
    2. The Substances are Associated With a Disease for Which the U.S. 
    Population is at Risk
        Dental caries is recognized in The Surgeon General's Report on 
    Nutrition and Health (Surgeon General's report) as a disease or health-
    related condition for which the United States population is at risk 
    (Ref. 7). The overall prevalence of dental caries imposes a substantial 
    burden on Americans. Of the 13 leading health problems in the United 
    States, dental diseases rank second in direct costs (Ref. 7).
        Based on this fact, FDA tentatively concludes that sugar alcohols 
    meet the requirement in Sec. 101.14(b)(1).
    3. The Substances Are Food
        Sugar alcohols are used as replacements for simple and complex 
    sugars as sweeteners and bulking agents in foods (Ref. 1). Thus sugar 
    alcohols are consumed for their taste and for their effect as a 
    stabilizer and thickener (21 CFR 170.3(o)(28)). Therefore, FDA 
    tentatively concludes that these substances satisfy the preliminary 
    requirements of Sec. 101.14(b)(3)(i).
    4. The Substances Are Safe and Lawful
        Several of the sugar alcohols that are the subject of this 
    proceeding are currently listed in FDA's food additive and generally 
    recognized as safe (GRAS) regulations, i.e., xylitol (21 CFR 172.395), 
    mannitol (Sec. 180.25 (21 CFR 180.25)), and sorbitol (Sec. 184.1835 (21 
    CFR 184.1835)). Moreover, GRAS affirmation petitions have been 
    submitted for each of the remaining substances, i.e., maltitol (GRASP 
    6G0319), maltitol syrups (HGS syrups) (GRASP 3G0286), isomalt (GRASP 
    6G0321), lactitol (GRASP 2G0391), HSH (GRASP 5G0304) and HSH syrups 
    (GRASP 1G0375).
        The agency notes that these GRAS affirmation petitions are under 
    consideration and that any positive action resulting from this proposed 
    rule should not be interpreted as an indication that the agency has 
    affirmed those uses of the sugar alcohols as GRAS. Such determinations 
    can only be made after the agency has completed its review of the GRAS 
    petitions. A preliminary review of the GRAS affirmation petitions 
    reveals that they contain significant evidence supporting the safety of 
    these substances.
        The agency also points out, however, that some concerns about the 
    safety of sugar alcohols do exist. For example, in a filing notice for 
    the affirmation of the GRAS status of lactitol (58 FR 47746, September 
    10, 1993), FDA stated that ``the agency's notice of filing of GRASP 
    2G0391 should not be interpreted either as a determination, preliminary 
    or otherwise, that the issue of Leydig cell tumors has been resolved or 
    that lactitol qualifies for GRAS affirmation.'' Also, by notice in the 
    Federal Register of December 13, 1994 (59 FR 64207), the agency 
    announced the filing of a food additive petition (FAP 4A4412) to amend 
    the interim food additive status of mannitol to permit an alternate 
    method of manufacture. In this notice, the agency pointed out concerns 
    about data from studies on mannitol that demonstrate a significant 
    incidence of benign thymomas, and an abnormal growth of thymus gland 
    tissue, in female rats fed mannitol. In addition, the safety of sugar 
    alcohols has been examined by the Federation of American Societies for 
    Experimental Biology (FASEB) (Ref. 90), as well as internationally by 
    the Joint Expert Committee on Food Additives (Ref. 91). The agency also 
    notes that two of the sugar alcohols that are listed in FDA's food 
    additive and GRAS regulations, i.e., mannitol (Sec. 180.25) and 
    sorbitol (Sec. 184.1835), require a warning label regarding laxation if 
    daily consumption of these sugar alcohols is expected to exceed 20 
    grams (g) per day for mannitol and 50 g per day for sorbitol. Nothing 
    in this proposal alters these requirements.
        Based on the totality of the evidence, the agency is not 
    challenging, at this time, the petitioner's position that the use of 
    sugar alcohols is safe and lawful. Although FDA tentatively concludes 
    that the petitioner has satisfied the requirements of 
    Sec. 101.14(b)(3)(ii), the agency requests comments on its tentative 
    conclusion.
    III. Review of Scientific Evidence
    
    A. Introduction
    
        The development of dental caries is the result of an interaction 
    between sugars (and other fermentable carbohydrates, such as refined 
    flour) and oral bacteria in a suitable environment (Ref. 71). 
    Microorganisms, and Streptococcus mutans (S. mutans) in particular, in 
    dental plaque metabolize available dietary sugars, producing acid and 
    sticky polysaccharides that adhere to the tooth as plaque. Acid 
    produced from rapid and complete fermentation of sugars creates an acid 
    environment within the 
    
    [[Page 37510]]
    plaque, characterized by a pH of usually less than 5.0, that is capable 
    of demineralizing tooth enamel and causing a carious lesion.
        Studies designed to measure the cariogenicity of a food assess the 
    potential to cause caries if it is consumed in a standard way by a 
    highly susceptible subject (Ref. 8). The methods used to measure 
    cariogenic potential include long-term controlled human caries trials, 
    in vivo and in vitro plaque pH measurement, demineralization and 
    remineralization techniques, and rat caries models (Refs. 8 through 
    11). Because long-term clinical caries trials are difficult to conduct, 
    an integration of the plaque pH, animal caries, and demineralization 
    methodologies has been recommended as the best measure for establishing 
    the cariogenic potential of a food (Ref. 12). Experts recommend, 
    however, that these methods be used with appropriate controls, such as 
    sucrose, to assess experimental results (Ref. 13).
        Plaque acidity studies are useful in providing evidence on the 
    effects of many microbial and physiological factors on the cariogenic 
    potential of foods (Ref. 78). An acidic plaque environment at the tooth 
    surface, specifically a pH of less than 5.5, suggests microbial 
    fermentation of a substrate resulting in microbial growth, plaque and 
    acid production, and promotion of carious lesions from enamel 
    decalcification. Factors that can modify these effects include the 
    presence of promoters or inhibitors in food products that affect 
    bacteria growth, the nature of the acids produced as a result of 
    bacterial metabolism of food carbohydrates (Ref. 78), intraplaque 
    buffering, and the pH of mixed saliva (Ref. 74).
    
    B. Review of Scientific Evidence
    
    1. Evidence Considered in Reaching the Decision
        The petitioners submitted scientific evidence on the various sugar 
    alcohols and their effects on plaque, plaque pH, and dental caries. 
    This evidence included human (in vivo and epidemiological), animal, and 
    in vitro studies regarding the association between consumption of sugar 
    alcohols from chewing gum and other foods and plaque pH, acid 
    production, plaque quantity and quality, bacteria levels, and the 
    incidence of caries. The petition included four tables that summarized 
    the information for: (1) Human plaque and demineralization, (2) 
    bacteriological studies, (3) animal experiments, and (4) human 
    longitudinal and field studies. A fifth table provided a summary of 
    review articles.
        In addition to the information submitted by the petitioner, the 
    agency considered other studies and reviews, such as the reports on 
    health aspects of sugar alcohols by the Life Sciences Research Office 
    (LSRO) and the FASEB (Refs. 14 through 16). The agency also considered 
    the results of additional human epidemiological studies on caries 
    incidence and demineralization; studies of animal caries; and in vitro 
    plaque pH studies.
    2. Criteria for Selection of Human Studies
        The criteria that the agency used to select pertinent studies were 
    that the studies: (1) Present data and adequate descriptions of study 
    design and methods; (2) be available in English; (3) provide daily 
    intakes of the sugar alcohol or enough information to estimate their 
    daily intakes; (4) include in vivo or in vitro assessment of the 
    changes in plaque pH or plaque acid production; (5) for intervention 
    studies on caries development, be of no less than 2 years (yr) in 
    duration; and (6) be conducted in persons who generally represent the 
    healthy United States' population (adults or children).
        In selecting human studies for review, the agency decided that only 
    those studies investigating the use of sugar alcohols in chewing gums 
    and other foods, including mouth rinses that would be representative of 
    beverages, were appropriate for review. The agency excluded studies 
    that were published in abstract form because they lacked sufficient 
    detail on study design and methodologies, and because they lacked 
    necessary primary data. In selecting animal and in vitro studies for 
    review, the agency chose those studies that measured caries 
    development, plaque pH, or acid production from plaque bacteria.
    3. Criteria for Evaluating the Relationship Between Sugar Alcohols and 
    Human Dental Caries
        The subject of the petitioned health claim is the nonpromotion of 
    dental caries by sugar alcohol-containing foods, especially chewing gum 
    and confectioneries. To support this claim, there needs to be 
    significant scientific evidence to show that the sugar alcohol or sugar 
    alcohol mixture, e.g., HSH, makes no contribution to the progression of 
    dental carious lesions in humans. It would be difficult, if not 
    impossible, to design and execute a study that would directly address 
    this issue because such a study would require a control group that 
    consumed foods containing no sugars, fermentable carbohydrates, or 
    sugar alcohols.
        In the absence of studies that directly evaluate the nonpromotion 
    of dental caries by sugar alcohol-containing foods, the agency gave the 
    greatest weight to those studies that evaluated in vivo the acidogenic 
    potential of plaque and plaque pH of sugar alcohols and sucrose in 
    representative food systems (e.g., confectioneries and solutions). 
    These in vivo measures can provide specific information about the 
    effect of sugar alcohols in the oral environment and, more 
    specifically, about the effect of sugar alcohols on pH at the interface 
    between dental plaque and tooth surfaces. The more acidic the 
    environment on the tooth surface, the greater the chance for enamel 
    demineralization and caries formation.
        The agency also considered in vitro studies that measured plaque pH 
    and acid production of sugar alcohols in solution, and long-term caries 
    trials that evaluated caries development in a population using foods 
    containing sugar alcohols and sucrose. Studies investigating in situ 
    the demineralization or remineralization of enamel as a result of the 
    action of sugar alcohols on human dental plaque were considered as 
    supporting evidence by the agency.
    C. Human Studies
    
    1. Evaluation of Human Studies
        FDA evaluated the results of studies against general criteria for 
    good experimental design, execution, and analysis. The criteria that 
    the agency used in evaluating these studies included appropriateness of 
    subject selection criteria; adequacy of the description of the 
    subject's oral health before intervention; extent of evaluation of 
    subject's type of dental plaque (i.e., sticky or nonsticky, thick or 
    thin); methods of plaque collection; adequacy of methods used to assess 
    study endpoints (e.g., in vivo versus in vitro assessment of plaque 
    pH); and other study design characteristics, including randomization of 
    subjects, appropriateness of controls, report of attrition rates 
    (including reasons for attrition), frequency of snack or substance 
    consumption, recognition and control of confounding factors (for 
    example, the subject's use of fluoride during the test period), and 
    appropriateness of statistical tests and comparisons. The agency also 
    considered it desirable if information on treatment and control diets, 
    the sugar alcohol content of the test substance, and daily sugar 
    alcohol and nutrient intakes was available. 
    
    [[Page 37511]]
    
        A review of the studies evaluating the effect of sugar alcohols on 
    plaque pH and acid production and of the in vitro microbiological 
    studies is provided in Table 1. Table 2 provides a review of 
    epidemiological studies evaluating the incidence of dental caries and 
    studies on demineralization and remineralization.
    2. Summary of Evidence Relating Sugar Alcohol and Plaque pH or Acid 
    Production
        Bibby and Fu (Ref. 38) measured human plaque pH in vitro using 0.1-
    , 1.0-, or 10-percent solutions of the following sweeteners: Sucrose, 
    HSH, mannitol, isomalt, xylitol, isomaltulose, sorbose, saccharin, and 
    aspartame. Results showed the lowest plaque pH was attained with 
    sucrose (1- and 10- percent solution: pH less than 5.0). Plaque pH 
    decreased with increasing concentrations of isomalt, sorbitol, 
    mannitol, and HSH. The lowest pH attained for isomalt was about 5.6, 
    for sorbitol 5.82, for mannitol 5.22, and for HSH about 5.0. Negligible 
    acid production was measured from aspartame, saccharin, and xylitol. 
    Solution mixtures of xylitol (5 to 20 percent) and sucrose (10 percent) 
    were fermented to the same low pH as sucrose alone. Thus, the presence 
    of xylitol in a sucrose and xylitol mixture did not affect acid 
    production in plaque from sucrose.
        The results of this study support the contention that xylitol does 
    not promote dental caries by lowering plaque pH below 5.5. However, the 
    results for sorbitol, mannitol, isomalt, and HSH do not support a 
    ``nonpromotion'' claim. The results suggest that when higher 
    concentrations of these sweeteners are present in food, the plaque pH 
    may reach a level that will promote decalcification of dental enamel.
        Birkhed and Edwardsson (Ref. 39) measured plaque pH and acid 
    production of human plaque samples in solutions of mannitol, xylitol, 
    maltitol, sorbitol, French HSH, Swedish HSH, fructose, and glucose 
    syrups. Results showed that plaque pH in the presence of xylitol, 
    maltitol, mannitol, and French HSH increased or slightly decreased from 
    baseline (pH remaining at 6.8 or above). Sorbitol showed a slight 
    decrease in plaque pH, but the final pH attained was about 6.0. The 
    other sweeteners, including Swedish HSH, depressed plaque pH below pH 6 
    over the 30-min (min) test period. The results of this study showed 
    that mannitol and xylitol produced no plaque acid compared to sucrose. 
    Maltitol and sorbitol produced plaque acid at rates that were 10 to 30 
    percent of that of sucrose. French HSH produced 20 to 40 percent and 
    Swedish HSH 50 to 70 percent of the acid produced by sucrose.
        Birkhed et al. (Ref. 40) measured acid production in vitro and 
    plaque pH changes in vivo over a 30-min period following a 30-second(s) 
    mouth rinse with 10-percent glucose or sorbitol solutions. To determine 
    whether plaque microorganisms can adapt to the presence of sorbitol, 
    i.e., use it as a source of energy like sucrose, with repeated exposure 
    to the sugar alcohol, investigators measured plaque pH and acid 
    production at the end of a 6-week (wk) period. During the 6-wk period, 
    each subject rinsed their mouth six times per day for approximately 2 
    min at a time with a 10-percent sorbitol solution. At the end of 6 wk, 
    plaque pH was again measured for a 30-min period following a mouth 
    rinse with glucose and sorbitol. The study results showed acid 
    production in the presence of sorbitol, before adaptation, to be 11.3 
    percent of that from glucose. After the adaptation period, plaque acid 
    production from sorbitol increased to 30 percent of the glucose rate. 
    After the adaptation period to sorbitol, the glucose rinse produced 
    mean plaque pH values that were higher than before the adaptation 
    period. The differences in plaque pH, however, were only significant at 
    2 and 5 min following the rinse.
        Overall results of this study suggest that sorbitol produces very 
    little plaque acid. Mean plaque pH values after sorbitol adaptation in 
    the presence of the 10-percent sorbitol rinse showed only a slight 
    decrease from the baseline value. The differences in mean plaque pH, 
    compared to baseline, at 5, 10, 20, and 30 min following the rinse were 
    significant. The authors noted that the fermentability of sorbitol was 
    more pronounced after the adaptation period than before.
        Birkhed et al. (Ref. 41) studied the effects on in vivo plaque pH 
    and in vitro acid production from HSH (Swedish HSH), maltitol, 
    sorbitol, and xylitol. Subjects in each group sucked on two lozenges a 
    day, containing 0.5 g of one of the four sweeteners and 0.5 g of gum 
    arabic, four times daily between meals (total of eight lozenges per 
    day) for 3 months (mo). Changes in plaque pH over a 30-min period were 
    measured in each of the sugar alcohol groups after a 30-s mouth rinse 
    with a 50-percent solution containing the same sweetener as the 
    lozenge. The rinse was used 1 wk before and 1 wk after the lozenge 
    period. A control group consumed no lozenges but rinsed with each of 
    the four sweeteners. At least 1 wk separated each mouth rinse 
    experiment. Acid production activity (APA) from dental plaque suspended 
    in glucose and each of the four sugar alcohols was determined 1 wk 
    before and 1 wk after the 3-mo consumption period.
        The results with HSH showed that although plaque pH values differed 
    before and after the lozenge period, differences were not statistically 
    significant, and that the lowest plaque pH attained was above 6.0. In 
    the maltitol group, plaque pH before the lozenge period was higher than 
    the pH following the lozenge period. Differences at 2, 10, and 30 min 
    were statistically significant. However, there were no significant 
    differences in plaque pH at any time compared to baseline. The lowest 
    plaque pH recorded was about 6.9. Plaque pH in the xylitol group 
    changed very slightly, remaining around pH 7. Plaque pH in the sorbitol 
    group was higher before than after the lozenge period. Differences in 
    pH at times 0 to 20 min and 0 to 30 min before compared with after the 
    test period were statistically significant (p<0.05). final="" plaque="" ph="" values="" after="" the="" 30-min="" test="" period="" were="" between="" 6.7="" and="" 7.0.="" there="" were="" no="" significant="" differences="" in="" plaque="" ph="" between="" the="" test="" and="" control="" groups="" using="" any="" of="" the="" test="" rinses.="" comparing="" the="" apa="" results="" for="" each="" sweetener="" with="" those="" for="" glucose="" showed="" that="" hsh="" was="" 56="" percent="" of="" that="" of="" glucose="" 1="" wk="" before="" the="" lozenge="" period="" and="" 59="" percent="" of="" that="" of="" glucose="" 1="" wk="" after="" the="" lozenge="" period.="" the="" apa="" for="" maltitol="" compared="" to="" glucose="" was="" 26="" percent="" (before)="" and="" 32="" percent="" (after),="" sorbitol="" was="" 15="" percent="" (before)="" and="" 18="" percent="" (after),="" and="" xylitol="" was="" 0="" percent="" at="" both="" time="" periods.="" differences="" before="" and="" after="" each="" 3-mo="" lozenge="" period="" were="" not="" statistically="" significant="" for="" any="" of="" the="" sugar="" alcohols.="" the="" results="" of="" this="" study="" suggest="" that="" even="" though="" there="" is="" some="" acid="" production="" from="" hsh,="" maltitol,="" and="" sorbitol,="" the="" effect="" on="" plaque="" ph="" in="" vivo="" is="" not="" detrimental="" to="" tooth="" enamel.="" frostell="" (ref.="" 42)="" evaluated="" the="" effect="" on="" plaque="" ph="" of="" sugar="" solutions="" and="" different="" types="" of="" candy="" and="" foods.="" although="" the="" focus="" of="" this="" study="" was="" not="" sugar="" alcohols,="" the="" investigators="" used="" sorbitol="" and="" hsh="" as="" a="" comparison="" to="" sucrose="" in="" some="" of="" the="" experiments.="" plaque="" was="" collected="" prior="" to="" the="" test="" period,="" and="" its="" ph="" was="" determined.="" subjects="" then="" rinsed="" with="" a="" test="" solution="" or="" ate="" a="" piece="" of="" candy="" or="" other="" food="" being="" tested.="" plaque="" was="" collected="" after="" 2,="" 5,="" 10,="" 20,="" and="" 30="" min="" and="" its="" ph="" was="" again="" measured.="" sweeteners="" tested="" included="" a="" sucrose="" rinse="" (concentrations="" from="" 0.05="" to="" 50="" percent),="" sorbitol="" tablets="" (2="" g="" sorbitol),="" sugar="" tablets="" (containing="" [[page="" 37512]]="" glucose="" and="" sucrose),="" hsh="" candy,="" sugar="" candies="" (with="" sucrose,="" dextrose,="" and="" maltose),="" marmalades="" (60-percent="" hsh="" or="" sucrose),="" and="" sugar-="" sweetened="" sponge="" cakes,="" ginger="" cakes,="" marshmallows,="" and="" chocolates.="" results="" with="" the="" sucrose="" rinses="" showed="" that="" plaque="" ph="" decreased="" with="" increasing="" concentrations="" of="" sucrose.="" comparing="" the="" effects="" on="" plaque="" ph="" between="" the="" sorbitol="" and="" sucrose="" candies="" results="" showed="" that="" in="" the="" sorbitol="" group's="" plaque="" ph="" increased="" from="" about="" 6.5="" (baseline)="" to="" 6.9="" before="" returning="" to="" baseline.="" plaque="" ph="" decreased="" in="" the="" sucrose="" group="" from="" 6.5="" (baseline)="" to="" about="" 6.0.="" after="" 10="" min,="" the="" ph="" in="" the="" sucrose="" group="" slowly="" increased="" to="" about="" 6.3.="" differences="" in="" plaque="" ph="" between="" the="" sorbitol="" candy="" and="" sucrose="" candy="" groups="" were="" significant="" at="" all="" time="" periods.="" in="" the="" hsh="" candy="" group,="" plaque="" ph="" was="" significantly="" higher="" than="" that="" in="" the="" group="" consuming="" sucrose="" candy.="" differences="" were="" significant="" at="" all="" time="" periods.="" the="" lowest="" plaque="" ph="" in="" the="" hsh="" group="" was="" above="" ph="" 6.3.="" the="" group="" consuming="" marmalade="" with="" hsh="" experienced="" a="" drop="" in="" plaque="" ph="" to="" about="" 6.0="" (from="" 7.0)="" after="" 5="" min,="" followed="" by="" a="" gradual="" increase="" to="" a="" final="" ph="" of="" about="" 6.5.="" the="" group="" consuming="" sucrose="" marmalade="" experienced="" a="" plaque="" ph="" of="" about="" 5.3="" after="" 5="" min,="" followed="" by="" a="" gradual="" increase="" in="" ph="" to="" about="" 6.0.="" toors="" and="" herczog="" (ref.="" 43)="" evaluated="" in="" vivo="" plaque="" ph="" and="" in="" vitro="" fermentability="" of="" an="" experimental="" (nonsucrose)="" licorice="" in="" a="" pooled="" plaque-saliva="" mixture.="" fermentability="" (i.e.,="" acid="" production)="" of="" the="" test="" substrates="" was="" expressed="" as="" a="" percentage="" of="" the="" sucrose="" licorice.="" plaque="" was="" collected="" from="" 12="" volunteers="" on="" the="" day="" after="" they="" consumed="" 10="" pieces="" of="" the="" candy.="" in="" vivo="" plaque="" ph="" was="" measured="" during="" and="" after="" consumption="" of="" licorice="" by="" means="" of="" ph="" telemetry.="" substrates="" used="" in="" the="" above="" tests="" included="" sucrose="" licorice,="" the="" experimental="" licorice,="" components="" of="" the="" experimental="" licorice="" (including="" sorbitol,="" potato="" starch="" derivative,="" soy="" flour,="" and="" others),="" xylitol,="" hydrogenated="" potato="" starch="" (hps)="" (a="" type="" of="" hsh),="" and="" a="" white="" bread="" suspension.="" results="" showed="" the="" fermentability="" of="" the="" test="" substrates="" to="" be="" as="" follows:="" potato="" starch="" derivative="" (82="" percent),="" soy="" flour="" (75="" percent),="" sorbitol="" (12="" percent),="" experimental="" licorice="" (68="" percent),="" xylitol="" (5="" percent),="" hps="" (60="" percent),="" and="" white="" bread="" suspension="" (79="" percent).="" in="" vivo="" plaque="" ph="" results="" showed="" sucrose="" licorice="" with="" a="" minimum="" plaque="" ph="" of="" about="" 5.0,="" experimental="" licorice="" with="" a="" minimum="" plaque="" ph="" of="" about="" 5.5,="" and="" a="" sucrose="" rinse="" with="" a="" plaque="" ph="" of="" about="" 4.5.="" the="" results="" of="" this="" study="" show="" that="" food="" ingredients="" like="" soy="" flour="" can="" contribute="" to="" the="" cariogenicity="" of="" a="" food="" regardless="" of="" the="" presence="" of="" a="" sugar="" alcohol.="" gallagher="" and="" fussell="" (ref.="" 44)="" compared="" the="" in="" vitro="" fermentability="" of="" xylitol="" and="" other="" sugar="" alcohols="" with="" sucrose="" in="" dental="" plaque.="" plaque="" collected="" from="" adults="" and="" children="" of="" different="" ages="" was="" incubated="" in="" broth="" culture.="" acid="" production="" was="" measured="" as="" ph.="" the="" control="" media="" contained="" no="" added="" carbohydrates.="" the="" results="" of="" acid="" production="" measurements="" showed="" that="" sucrose="" was="" significantly="" more="" acidogenic="" compared="" to="" the="" control="" and="" xylitol.="" differences="" were="" significant.="" there="" was="" no="" significant="" difference="" in="" acid="" production="" between="" the="" control="" groups="" and="" the="" xylitol="" groups.="" gehring="" and="" hufnagel="" (ref.="" 45)="" described="" intra-="" and="" extraoral="" ph="" measurements="" of="" dental="" plaque.="" six="" adult="" men="" and="" women="" rinsed="" for="" 2="" min="" using="" one="" of="" seven="" test="" substances="" followed="" by="" intraoral="" plaque="" ph="" measurements="" after="" 3,="" 4,="" 5,="" 7,="" 9,="" 13,="" 17,="" 21,="" 27,="" and="" 32="" min.="" for="" the="" extraoral="" test,="" visible="" plaque="" was="" removed,="" suspended="" in="" distilled="" water,="" and="" the="" ph="" measured="" at="" 3,="" 5,="" 7,="" 9,="" 11,="" 15,="" and="" 25="" min="" after="" subjects="" rinsed="" with="" test="" substances.="" test="" substances="" included="" 20="" percent="" solutions="" of="" glucose,="" sucrose,="" fructose,="" hsh,="" mannitol,="" isomalt,="" sorbitol,="" sorbose,="" or="" xylitol.="" the="" results="" of="" the="" intraoral="" plaque="" ph="" measurements="" showed="" only="" slight="" ph="" decreases="" within="" 5="" min="" after="" administration="" of="" xylitol="" and="" mannitol,="" with="" a="" return="" to="" baseline="" measures="" at="" the="" end="" of="" the="" 32-min="" test="" period.="" sorbitol,="" hsh,="" isomalt,="" and="" sorbose="" reached="" a="" minimum="" ph="" just="" below="" 6.0="" after="" 5="" min="" followed="" by="" a="" slight="" increase="" to="" about="" ph="" 6.1="" to="" 6.4="" at="" the="" end="" of="" the="" test="" period.="" sucrose,="" glucose,="" and="" fructose="" showed="" a="" minimum="" ph="" value="" of="" about="" 4.6="" to="" 4.7="" (after="" 5="" min)="" with="" an="" increase="" to="" about="" ph="" 5.3="" to="" 5.5="" at="" the="" end="" of="" 32="" min.="" minimum="" plaque="" ph="" by="" extraoral="" measurements="" were="" higher="" than="" the="" ph="" according="" to="" intraoral="" measurements.="" sucrose,="" glucose,="" and="" fructose="" minimum="" ph="" values="" ranged="" from="" about="" 5.0="" to="" 5.7="" after="" 5="" min="" and="" increased="" to="" about="" 5.6="" to="" 6.0="" after="" 32="" min.="" other="" ph="" values="" were="" not="" given.="" the="" authors="" attribute="" the="" differences="" in="" intra-="" and="" extraoral="" plaque="" ph="" measurements="" to="" methods="" in="" handling="" plaque="" removal="" and="" the="" influence="" of="" saliva="" substances.="" havenaar="" et="" al.="" (ref.="" 46)="" evaluated="" in="" vitro="" acid="" formation="" from="" oral="" bacteria="" in="" the="" presence="" of="" sugar="" substitutes="" and="" the="" influence="" of="" xylitol="" on="" glucose="" in="" growing="" cultures="" of="" s.="" mutans.="" fresh="" isolates="" of="" streptococci="" and="" other="" strains="" were="" obtained="" from="" caries="" free="" and="" caries="" active="" subjects.="" acid="" production="" in="" 1-percent="" solutions="" of="" glucose="" (control),="" sorbose,="" sorbitol,="" xylitol,="" lactitol,="" maltitol,="" and="" hsh="" was="" determined="" by="" incubating="" the="" sweetener="" in="" phenol="" red="" broth="" containing="" oral="" bacteria.="" a="" color="" change="" indicated="" acid="" formation.="" changes="" in="" ph="" was="" measured="" after="" subculturing="" s.="" mutans="" in="" each="" of="" the="" sweeteners,="" after="" frequent="" subculturing="" in="" each="" sweetener="" to="" obtain="" adapted="" strains="" of="" s.="" mutans,="" and="" after="" subculturing="" the="" adapted="" strains="" once="" in="" glucose="" and="" resubculturing="" in="" the="" sweetener.="" growth="" of="" s.="" mutans="" and="" ph="" measurements="" were="" also="" measured="" in="" a="" glucose="" broth="" with="" and="" without="" added="" xylitol.="" the="" results="" showed="" no="" acid="" production="" from="" xylitol="" or="" sorbose="" and="" acid="" production="" from="" sorbitol,="" lactitol,="" and="" hsh.="" the="" authors="" stated="" that="" s.="" mutans="" slowly="" fermented="" maltitol.="" results="" also="" showed="" no="" change="" in="" ph="" with="" xylitol="" and="" a="" moderate="" drop="" in="" ph="" to="" about="" 6="" to="" 6.5="" (actual="" values="" not="" given)="" with="" maltitol,="" sorbitol,="" lactitol,="" and="" hsh="" after="" 120="" min.="" adaptation="" by="" s.="" mutans="" to="" the="" sweeteners="" resulted="" in="" a="" marked="" increase="" in="" fermentation,="" with="" final="" ph="" values="" dropping="" to="" about="" 4.5="" to="" 5.5.="" after="" one="" subculturing="" of="" the="" adapted="" strain="" in="" glucose,="" s.="" mutans="" lost="" most="" of="" its="" ability="" to="" ferment="" the="" sweeteners.="" the="" addition="" of="" small="" amounts="" of="" xylitol="" to="" glucose="" broth="" somewhat="" inhibited="" acid="" production="" from="" s.="" mutans,="" but="" it="" had="" no="" effect="" on="" final="" ph="" attained.="" jensen="" (ref.="" 47)="" measured="" interproximal="" plaque="" ph="" in="" subjects="" using="" five="" different="" hsh's="" and="" sorbitol="" and="" sucrose="" as="" controls.="" four="" subjects="" rinsed="" with="" a="" 5="" milliliter="" (ml)="" portion="" of="" the="" test="" solution="" for="" 60="" min.="" plaque="" ph="" was="" then="" monitored="" for="" 30="" min.="" following="" the="" ph="" measurements,="" the="" subject="" rinsed="" their="" mouth="" with="" distilled="" water="" and="" chewed="" paraffin="" for="" about="" 5="" min="" to="" bring="" oral="" ph="" back="" to="" resting="" levels.="" the="" test="" was="" repeated="" with="" each="" subject="" using="" each="" of="" the="" four="" test="" solutions.="" the="" results="" showed="" that="" plaque="" ph="" for="" all="" test="" substances="" remained="" above="" ph="" 6.0="" over="" the="" 30-min="" test="" period.="" plaque="" ph="" using="" the="" sorbitol="" rinse="" was="" similar="" to="" that="" using="" the="" test="" substances.="" using="" the="" sucrose="" rinse="" resulted="" in="" plaque="" ph="" measurements="" of="" approximately="" 4.0="" to="" 4.1.="" the="" identity="" of="" the="" test="" substances="" was="" not="" provided="" in="" this="" unpublished="" study.="" results="" indicate="" that="" the="" hsh="" solutions="" used="" in="" this="" study="" were="" [[page="" 37513]]="" significantly="" less="" acidogenic="" than="" sucrose="" and="" no="" different="" than="" sorbitol.="" maki="" et="" al.="" (ref.="" 48)="" compared="" acid="" production="" in="" vivo="" from="" isomaltulose,="" sorbitol,="" xylitol,="" and="" sucrose="" (control)="" in="" human="" dental="" plaque.="" dental="" plaque="" was="" collected="" from="" 12="" individuals="" and="" incubated="" with="" phosphate="" buffer.="" after="" endogenous="" acid="" production="" was="" measured,="" a="" 1-percent="" solution="" of="" the="" test="" substance="" in="" the="" same="" buffer="" was="" added,="" and="" acid="" production="" measured="" again.="" the="" results="" showed="" no="" acid="" production="" in="" the="" presence="" of="" xylitol.="" compared="" to="" sucrose="" (100-percent="" acid="" production),="" acid="" production="" from="" sorbitol="" was="" 1="" percent.="" the="" authors="" noted="" that="" the="" percent="" acid="" production="" from="" sorbitol="" may="" vary="" considerably="" among="" individuals="" and="" with="" the="" amount="" of="" exposure="" to="" sorbitol.="" park="" et="" al.="" (ref.="" 49)="" measured="" interproximal="" plaque="" ph="" in="" five="" subjects="" after="" consuming="" one="" of="" three="" snacks="" alone="" or="" one="" of="" three="" snacks="" followed="" by="" a="" single="" mint="" containing="" sorbitol="" (94="" percent)="" or="" a="" sorbitol="" and="" xylitol="" blend="" (79="" percent="" and="" 15="" percent,="" respectively).="" when="" mints="" were="" used,="" they="" were="" consumed="" 3="" min="" following="" ingestion="" of="" the="" sweet="" snack.="" snacks="" tested="" included="" a="" sandwich="" cookie,="" cupcake,="" and="" granola="" bar.="" a="" randomized="" block="" design="" was="" used="" to="" administer="" the="" test="" products="" and="" mints="" (see="" table="" 2="" for="" further="" details).="" the="" lowest="" plaque="" ph="" attained="" after="" consuming="" the="" three="" test="" products="" without="" mints="" ranged="" from="" 4.02="" to="" 4.16.="" when="" the="" sorbitol="" mint="" was="" consumed="" following="" the="" test="" product,="" mean="" plaque="" ph="" values="" increased="" and="" ranged="" from="" 4.68="" to="" 5.04.="" when="" the="" sorbitol="" and="" xylitol="" mint="" was="" consumed="" following="" consumption="" of="" the="" test="" products,="" mean="" plaque="" ph="" increased="" to="" a="" range="" of="" 5.32="" to="" 5.60.="" differences="" in="" mean="" plaque="" ph="" values="" between="" the="" mint="" products="" differed="" significantly="" when="" the="" mints="" were="" used="" after="" the="" granola="" bar="" and="" cupcake="" challenges.="" there="" was="" no="" significant="" difference="" in="" mean="" plaque="" ph="" between="" the="" sorbitol="" (5.04)="" and="" the="" sorbitol="" and="" xylitol="" mint="" (5.60)="" products="" when="" these="" products="" were="" used="" after="" the="" sandwich="" cookie="" challenge.="" the="" results="" show="" that="" consumption="" of="" a="" sugarless="" mint="" reduced="" the="" acidogenicity="" of="" the="" test="" snacks,="" although="" final="" ph="" values="" remained="" below="" ph="" 5.5="" in="" all="" but="" one="" test.="" the="" authors="" attributed="" the="" results="" of="" this="" study="" to="" the="" stimulatory="" effects="" on="" salivary="" flow="" by="" sugar="" alcohols.="" increasing="" salivary="" flow="" increases="" the="" buffering="" capacity="" of="" saliva,="" thus="" reducing="" the="" acidogenic="" potential="" of="" a="" variety="" of="" snack="" foods.="" the="" authors="" also="" attributed="" the="" additional="" buffering="" effects="" of="" the="" sorbitol="" and="" xylitol="" mint="" to="" the="" presence="" of="" xylitol="" and="" its="" potential="" benefits="" in="" reducing="" plaque="" microbial="" activity.="" without="" a="" sucrose-containing="" mint="" as="" a="" comparison,="" however,="" the="" influence="" of="" sugar="" alcohols="" on="" saliva="" production="" cannot="" be="" adequately="" assessed.="" soderling="" and="" coworkers="" (ref.="" 50)="" investigated="" the="" effect="" on="" dental="" plaque="" of="" chewing="" gums="" that="" contained="" either="" xylitol,="" sorbitol,="" or="" a="" mixture="" of="" xylitol="" and="" sorbitol="" and="" compared="" the="" results="" with="" those="" obtained="" with="" subjects="" who="" used="" sucrose="" gums.="" twenty-one="" subjects="" (adults,="" ages="" 19="" to="" 35="" yr)="" who="" were="" not="" habitual="" gum="" chewers="" were="" randomly="" assigned="" to="" chew="" gum="" containing="" either="" xylitol,="" sorbitol,="" or="" a="" blend="" of="" the="" two="" sugar="" alcohols="" for="" 2="" wk.="" subjects="" chewed="" 10="" pieces="" of="" gum="" per="" day="" for="" an="" intake="" of="" either="" 10.9="" g="" xylitol,="" 10.9="" g="" sorbitol,="" or="" 10.9="" g="" xylitol="" and="" sorbitol="" (8.5="" g="" xylitol="" and="" 2.4="" g="" sorbitol).="" the="" control="" group="" was="" made="" up="" of="" seven="" habitual="" sucrose="" gum="" users.="" subjects="" maintained="" their="" usual="" diets="" and="" oral="" hygiene="" except="" just="" before="" to="" clinic="" visits.="" interdental="" plaque="" ph="" was="" collected,="" and="" the="" resting="" plaque="" ph="" determined.="" plaque="" ph="" was="" measured="" at="" 2,="" 5,="" 10,="" 15,="" and="" 20="" min="" after="" an="" oral="" rinse="" containing="" the="" same="" sugar="" alcohols="" as="" used="" in="" the="" gum.="" afterward,="" subjects="" rinsed="" with="" water="" and="" chewed="" a="" piece="" of="" paraffin="" for="" 1="" min="" to="" expedite="" removal="" of="" sugar="" alcohols="" from="" the="" mouth.="" baseline="" ph="" was="" again="" measured,="" followed="" by="" a="" mouth="" rinse="" with="" 10="" ml="" of="" 10-percent="" sucrose.="" plaque="" ph="" was="" again="" determined.="" the="" results="" from="" using="" gum="" for="" 2="" wk="" showed="" no="" significant="" changes="" in="" resting="" plaque="" ph="" in="" the="" xylitol="" and="" xylitol="" and="" sorbitol="" groups,="" whereas="" the="" use="" of="" sorbitol="" gum="" was="" associated="" with="" a="" lower="" ph.="" final="" plaque="" ph="" values="" after="" use="" of="" sorbitol="" gum="" were="" significantly="" lower="" than="" baseline="" values,="" but="" all="" final="" values="" remained="" above="" ph="" 6.0.="" birkhed="" and="" skude="" (ref.="" 51)="" evaluated,="" among="" other="" tests,="" the="" apa="" from="" glucose,="" soluble="" starch,="" and="" swedish="" hsh="" in="" dental="" plaque.="" eleven="" adults="" were="" instructed="" to="" avoid="" oral="" hygienic="" procedures="" for="" 2="" days.="" no="" dietary="" changes="" were="" required.="" at="" the="" end="" of="" 2="" days,="" plaque="" was="" collected.="" the="" apa="" was="" determined="" from="" 3-percent="" solutions="" of="" glucose,="" boiled="" soluble="" starch,="" and="" hsh.="" the="" apa="" was="" also="" determined="" in="" increasing="" concentrations="" (0.003="" to="" 12="" percent="" weight="" per="" volume="" (w/v))="" of="" starch="" and="" hsh.="" the="" results="" showed="" significantly="" lower=""><0.001) apa="" from="" soluble="" starch="" (75.7="" percent)="" and="" hsh="" (61.5="" percent)="" compared="" to="" glucose="" (99.7="" percent).="" the="" apa="" from="" hsh="" was="" also="" significantly="" lower=""><0.01) than="" that="" from="" soluble="" starch.="" the="" range="" of="" optimum="" acid="" production="" for="" both="" substrates="" was="" 0.03="" to="" 6="" percent.="" the="" authors="" noted="" that="" swedish="" hsh="" is="" more="" fermentable="" than="" french="" hsh,="" which="" contains="" less="" high="" molecular="" weight="" hydrogenated="" saccharides="" than="" swedish="" hsh.="" grenby="" et="" al.="" (ref.="" 76)="" evaluated="" the="" dental="" properties="" of="" lactitol="" compared="" to="" five="" other="" bulk="" sweeteners,="" i.e.,="" sucrose,="" glucose,="" sorbitol,="" mannitol,="" and="" xylitol,="" in="" vitro="" using="" a="" standardized="" mixed="" culture="" of="" dental="" plaque="" microorganisms.="" sweeteners="" were="" incubated="" for="" 24="" hours="" (h)="" in="" media="" containing="" a="" 1-percent="" solution="" of="" one="" of="" the="" six="" sweeteners.="" plaque="" microorganisms="" were="" also="" incubated="" in="" media="" containing="" the="" sweeteners="" with="" segments="" of="" intact="" surfaces="" or="" with="" segments="" of="" pulverized="" dental="" enamel.="" the="" demineralization="" action="" of="" the="" acid="" produced="" by="" microbial="" fermentation="" was="" assayed="" by="" calcium="" and="" phosphorous="" analyses.="" the="" greatest="" amount="" of="" acid="" production="" and="" lowest="" ph="" (significantly="" different="" than="" the="" sugar="" alcohols)="" were="" reported="" with="" sucrose="" and="" glucose="" (ph="" of="" 4.0="" to="" 4.3).="" lactitol="" and="" xylitol="" showed="" only="" slight="" changes="" in="" ph="" and="" acid="" production="" over="" the="" 24="" h="" (final="" ph="" of="" 6.1="" to="" 6.3);="" whereas="" sorbitol="" and="" mannitol="" showed="" slight="" changes="" in="" ph="" during="" the="" first="" 12="" h="">6), then gradually decreased to a final pH 
    of 4.6 to 5.1 after 24 h.
        The results of the demineralization test showed highly significant 
    differences (p<0.001) between="" sucrose="" and="" glucose="" and="" the="" sugar="" alcohols.="" the="" reductions="" in="" calcium="" and="" phosphorous="" dissolving="" in="" sorbitol="" was="" approximately="" 80="" to="" 85="" percent,="" mannitol="" 63="" to="" 69="" percent,="" and="" lactitol="" and="" xylitol="" 94="" to="" 98="" percent="" compared="" to="" mineral="" loss="" in="" the="" presence="" of="" glucose.="" 3.="" summary="" of="" evidence="" relating="" sugar="" alcohol="" and="" dental="" caries:="" long-="" term="" studies="" moller="" and="" poulsen="" (ref.="" 20)="" determined="" the="" effect="" of="" long-term="" chewing="" of="" sorbitol="" chewing="" gum="" on="" the="" incidence="" of="" dental="" caries,="" plaque,="" and="" gingivitis.="" the="" sorbitol="" chewing="" gum="" contained="" calcium="" phosphate="" which="" acts="" as="" a="" buffer="" in="" saliva="" to="" help="" maintain="" ph="" and="" aid="" remineralization.="" two="" groups="" of="" children,="" ages="" 8="" to="" 12="" yr="" of="" age,="" from="" two="" different="" schools="" in="" denmark="" took="" part="" in="" this="" 2-yr="" study.="" group="" 1="" chewed="" one="" piece="" of="" sorbitol-containing="" gum="" three="" times="" a="" day,="" after="" meals.="" group="" 2="" chewed="" no="" gum="" and="" [[page="" 37514]]="" served="" as="" the="" control.="" at="" the="" start="" of="" the="" study,="" subjects="" in="" group="" 1="" had="" more="" decayed="" and="" filled="" toothsurfaces="" than="" the="" control="" group;="" however,="" the="" differences="" were="" not="" statistically="" significant.="" the="" results="" showed="" that="" the="" sorbitol="" group="" had="" a="" significantly="" lower="" incidence="" of="" dental="" caries="" compared="" to="" the="" control="" after="" 2="" yr.="" the="" control="" group,="" which="" did="" not="" chew="" gum,="" did="" not="" experience="" the="" same="" salivary="" stimulation="" from="" the="" chewing="" of="" gum,="" nor="" did="" they="" have="" an="" equivalent="" source="" of="" calcium="" phosphate.="" these="" are="" large="" confounders="" in="" this="" study.="" the="" authors="" noted="" a="" number="" of="" factors="" that="" could="" contribute="" to="" the="" observed="" results,="" such="" as="" the="" sorbitol="" content="" of="" the="" chewing="" gum,="" reduced="" consumption="" of="" sugar-containing="" sweets,="" intra-examiner="" variability,="" and="" other="" unknown="" conditions.="" banozcy="" et="" al.="" (ref.="" 21)="" evaluated="" the="" effect="" of="" sorbitol-="" containing="" sweets="" on="" the="" caries="" increment="" of="" children="" aged="" 3="" to="" 12="" yr,="" in="" a="" clinical="" longitudinal="" study="" planned="" for="" 3="" yr.="" the="" test="" group="" consumed="" 8="" g="" of="" sorbitol="" per="" day="" between="" meals,="" while="" the="" control="" group="" consumed="" a="" similar="" amount="" of="" sucrose-containing="" sweets.="" the="" results="" showed="" that="" mean="" decayed,="" missing,="" or="" filled="" (dmf)="" values="" for="" teeth="" in="" the="" sorbitol="" group="" were="" 1.09,="" 0.90,="" and="" 1.18="" in="" the="" first,="" second,="" and="" third="" yr,="" respectively.="" the="" sucrose="" group="" had="" mean="" dmf="" values="" of="" 2.61,="" 1.86,="" and="" 1.13="" for="" the="" first,="" second,="" and="" third="" yr,="" respectively.="" the="" differences="" in="" caries="" increments="" were="" significant=""><0.001) in="" the="" first="" and="" second="" yr="" but="" not="" in="" the="" third="" yr.="" the="" authors="" noted="" that="" the="" lack="" of="" significance="" in="" the="" third="" yr="" may="" be="" attributed="" somewhat="" to="" a="" lack="" of="" subject="" compliance="" since="" the="" children="" in="" the="" sorbitol="" group="" traded="" sweets="" with="" the="" sucrose="" group,="" in="" addition="" to="" other="" factors.="" results="" of="" this="" study="" indicate="" that="" sorbitol="" is="" less="" cariogenic="" than="" sucrose.="" kandelman="" and="" gagnon="" (ref.="" 22)="" reported="" on="" the="" incidence="" and="" progression="" of="" dental="" caries="" in="" school="" children="" after="" 12="" mo="" of="" a="" 2-yr="" study="" using="" xylitol="" in="" chewing="" gum.="" the="" subjects="" were="" 433="" children,="" ages="" 8="" to="" 9="" yr="" old,="" from="" 13="" elementary="" schools,="" and="" were="" from="" low="" socioeconomic="" areas="" with="" a="" high="" caries="" rate.="" the="" children="" were="" assigned="" to="" one="" of="" three="" groups:="" a="" control="" group="" that="" received="" no="" chewing="" gum="" and="" chewed="" no="" gum="" while="" at="" school,="" a="" test="" group="" that="" received="" gum="" containing="" 15-percent="" xylitol="" and="" 50-percent="" sorbitol="" (xyl15),="" and="" a="" second="" test="" group="" that="" received="" gum="" containing="" 65-percent="" xylitol="" (xyl65).="" students="" were="" not="" randomly="" assigned="" to="" groups.="" rather,="" an="" entire="" class="" was="" assigned="" to="" one="" of="" the="" three="" groups.="" the="" xyl65="" group="" consumed="" 3.4="" g="" xylitol="" per="" day,="" and="" the="" xyl15="" group="" consumed="" 0.8="" g="" per="" day.="" the="" results="" showed="" significantly="" lower="" net="" progression="" of="" decay="" (npd)="" (i.e.,="" the="" difference="" in="" the="" number="" of="" reversals="" from="" the="" progressions="" of="" decay="" for="" each="" child)="" in="" the="" xyl65="" group="" (1.25)="" than="" in="" xyl15="" group="" (1.87)="">< 0.05),="" and="" each="" xylitol="" group="" had="" significantly=""><0.001) lower="" npd="" than="" the="" control.="" the="" decayed,="" missing,="" filled="" surfaces="" (dmfs)="" increment="" was="" also="" significantly="" lower="" in="" the="" xylitol="" groups="" compared="" to="" the="" control.="" there="" was="" no="" significant="" difference="" in="" dmfs="" between="" the="" gum="" groups.="" results="" of="" this="" study="" suggest="" that="" chewing="" gum="" containing="" xylitol="" or="" a="" blend="" of="" xylitol="" and="" sorbitol="" provided="" more="" benefits="" for="" teeth="" than="" not="" chewing="" gum="" at="" all.="" rekola="" (ref.="" 23)="" compared="" the="" progression="" of="" incipient="" carious="" lesions="" on="" buccal="" smooth="" surfaces="" in="" subjects="" participating="" in="" the="" 2-yr="" turku="" sugar="" study="" (ref.="" 24).="" subjects="" consumed="" either="" a="" diet="" containing="" sucrose="" or="" one="" with="" almost="" complete="" replacement="" of="" sucrose="" products="" with="" xylitol-containing="" products.="" the="" progression="" of="" carious="" lesions="" were="" assessed="" by="" use="" of="" color="" dental="" photographs="" of="" the="" right="" and="" left="" sides="" and="" of="" the="" front="" of="" maxillary="" and="" mandibular="" teeth.="" the="" results="" showed="" that="" the="" sucrose="" group="" had="" a="" significant="" tendency="" for="" increased="" size="" of="" carious="" lesions="" over="" the="" 2-yr="" period="" compared="" to="" the="" group="" consuming="" xylitol=""><0.01). the="" white="" spot="" lesions="" in="" the="" xylitol="" group="" were="" significantly="" smaller="" than="" those="" in="" the="" sucrose="" group.="" rekola="" (ref.="" 25)="" quantified="" changes="" in="" the="" size="" of="" approximal="" carious="" lesions="" in="" subjects="" after="" 2="" yr="" of="" almost="" complete="" substitution="" of="" dietary="" sucrose="" with="" xylitol="" (ref.="" 23).="" bitewing="" radiographs="" were="" taken="" during="" the="" 2-yr="" study.="" in="" this="" study,="" the="" radiographs="" were="" projected="" onto="" a="" planimetry="" plate="" so="" that="" the="" area="" of="" the="" lesions="" could="" be="" determined.="" the="" sizes="" of="" the="" lesions="" at="" the="" different="" time="" periods="" were="" compared,="" and="" the="" rate="" of="" caries="" progression="" was="" also="" compared.="" at="" the="" beginning="" of="" the="" study,="" there="" was="" no="" difference="" in="" the="" mean="" size="" of="" carious="" lesions="" between="" groups.="" the="" size="" of="" the="" approximal="" lesions,="" i.e.,="" lesions="" that="" were="" neither="" filler="" nor="" overlapping="" at="" 0="" and="" 24="" mo,="" in="" the="" sucrose="" group="" increased="" significantly=""><0.001) over="" 2="" yr="" compared="" to="" the="" lesions="" in="" the="" xylitol="" group.="" the="" lesion="" size="" in="" the="" xylitol="" group="" remained="" virtually="" unchanged.="" the="" authors="" reported="" a="" trend="" towards="" decreasing="" lesion="" size="" in="" canines="" and="" first="" molars="" compared="" to="" molars="" and="" second="" premolars="" in="" the="" xylitol="" group.="" this="" trend="" was="" not="" observed="" in="" the="" sucrose="" group.="" results="" of="" these="" studies="" support="" the="" observation="" that="" xylitol="" is="" less="" cariogenic="" than="" sucrose.="" in="" a="" world="" health="" organization="" (who)="" field="" trial="" in="" hungary="" (ref.="" 26),="" the="" effects="" of="" a="" partial="" substitution="" of="" sucrose="" for="" xylitol="" in="" the="" diets="" of="" 689="" institutionalized="" children,="" ages="" 6="" to="" 11="" yr,="" were="" examined.="" the="" xylitol="" group="" used="" fluoride="" dentifrice="" and="" consumed="" no="" more="" than="" 20="" g="" of="" xylitol="" per="" day="" in="" chewing="" gum,="" chocolate,="" hard="" candy,="" and="" wafers.="" the="" fluoride="" group="" received="" fluoride="" in="" dentifrice,="" water,="" and="" milk,="" but="" consumed="" no="" xylitol="" products.="" the="" control="" group="" received="" no="" fluoride="" treatment="" and="" consumed="" no="" xylitol-containing="" products.="" after="" 3="" yr,="" the="" xylitol="" group="" had="" a="" statistically="" significant=""><0.001) lower="" incidence="" of="" caries="" compared="" to="" the="" control="" and="" fluoride="" groups.="" the="" authors="" noted="" that="" results="" from="" this="" study="" were="" obtained="" under="" conditions="" where="" caries="" prevalence="" and="" incidence="" were="" still="" high.="" results="" of="" this="" study="" support="" the="" observation="" that="" xylitol-="" containing="" products="" are="" less="" cariogenic="" than="" sucrose-containing="" products.="" in="" a="" 2-yr="" substudy="" (ref.="" 28)="" of="" the="" who="" xylitol="" field="" studies="" in="" hungary="" (ref.="" 26),="" scheinin="" and="" coworkers="" assessed="" the="" caries="" increment="" with="" systemic="" fluoride="" (fluoride="" group)="" and="" restorative="" treatment="" only="" (control="" group).="" this="" study="" differed="" from="" the="" 3-yr="" study="" primarily="" in="" baseline="" differences.="" children="" entering="" the="" institutions="" during="" the="" first="" yr="" of="" the="" 3-yr="" study="" were="" included="" in="" this="" substudy.="" the="" substudy="" showed="" similar="" favorable="" results="" with="" xylitol="" compared="" to="" the="" control.="" the="" caries="" increment="" was="" 3.8="" in="" the="" xylitol="" group,="" 4.8="" in="" the="" fluoride="" group,="" and="" 6.0="" in="" the="" control="" group.="" the="" differences="" in="" caries="" increment="" between="" the="" xylitol="" group="" and="" the="" other="" two="" groups="" were="" significant=""><0.001). results="" again="" supported="" a="" lower="" incidence="" of="" caries="" when="" xylitol="" is="" substituted="" for="" sucrose="" in="" the="" diet.="" in="" a="" who="" field="" trial="" in="" thailand="" and="" french="" polynesia="" (ref.="" 29),="" the="" usefulness="" of="" a="" fluoride="" rinse,="" fluoridated="" sucrose="" chewing="" gum,="" and="" fluoridated="" xylitol="" (51="" percent)="" and="" sorbitol="" gum="" in="" controlling="" dental="" caries="" was="" evaluated="" in="" children="" over="" a="" 3-yr="" period.="" in="" french="" polynesia,="" a="" fourth="" group="" used="" nonfluoridated="" chewing="" gum="" sweetened="" with="" xylitol="" (51="" percent)="" and="" sorbitol.="" approximately="" 250="" children="" at="" each="" of="" the="" ages="" 6="" to="" 7="" yr,="" 9="" to="" 10="" yr,="" and="" 12="" to="" 13="" yr="" were="" examined.="" the="" 12-="" to="" 13-yr="" age="" group="" was="" intended="" to="" provide="" data="" for="" [[page="" 37515]]="" comparison="" with="" the="" 9-="" to="" 10-yr="" old="" group,="" who="" would="" be="" ages="" 12="" to="" 13="" yr="" at="" the="" end="" of="" the="" study.="" the="" results="" from="" the="" thailand="" study="" showed="" that="" the="" fluoridated="" xylitol="" and="" sorbitol="" gum="" group="" had="" lower="" decayed,="" missing,="" and="" filled="" teeth="" (dmft)="" and="" dmfs="" scores="" than="" either="" the="" fluoride="" rinse="" group="" or="" the="" fluoridated="" sucrose="" gum="" group.="" results="" from="" the="" french="" polynesia="" study="" showed="" that="" the="" subjects="" started="" with="" much="" higher="" dmft="" and="" dmfs="" mean="" scores="" initially="" than="" the="" subjects="" in="" thailand.="" although="" the="" results="" with="" the="" fluoride="" gum="" sweetened="" with="" the="" sugar="" alcohols="" were="" better="" than="" any="" of="" the="" other="" treatments,="" the="" overall="" caries="" incidence="" in="" this="" population="" is="" very="" high.="" the="" presence="" of="" fluoride="" in="" the="" chewing="" gums="" confounds="" the="" results="" of="" the="" sugar="" alcohols.="" the="" authors="" describe="" this="" study="" population="" as="" a="" community="" experiencing="" an="" increase="" in="" the="" prevalence="" of="" the="" disease.="" this="" study="" group="" does="" not="" reflect="" the="" general="" population="" of="" the="" united="" states.="" in="" another="" who="" field="" trial,="" kandelman="" and="" coworkers="" (ref.="" 30)="" evaluated="" the="" effects="" of="" xylitol="" intervention="" on="" dental="" caries="" in="" french="" polynesian="" children,="" ages="" 7="" to="" 12="" yr.="" of="" 746="" subjects="" enrolled="" in="" this="" 32-mo="" study,="" 468="" completed="" the="" study.="" subjects="" in="" the="" xylitol="" groups="" consumed="" 20="" g="" of="" xylitol="" daily="" in="" various="" food="" products,="" such="" as="" chewing="" gum,="" hard="" candy,="" chocolate,="" and="" gumdrops.="" the="" control="" group="" received="" no="" xylitol-containing="" products.="" the="" results="" showed="" significantly="" reduced="" caries="" increment="" rate="" by="" 37="" percent="" to="" 39="" percent="" in="" the="" xylitol="" groups="" compared="" to="" the="" controls.="" this="" study="" was="" neither="" randomized="" nor="" blinded.="" results="" support="" the="" observation="" that="" xylitol-containing="" products="" are="" less="" cariogenic="" than="" the="" sucrose-containing="" products.="" frostell="" and="" coworkers="" (ref.="" 31)="" determined="" the="" effect="" on="" caries="" increment="" in="" children,="" ages="" from="" 2\1/2\="" to="" 4="" yr,="" of="" substituting="" hsh="" for="" sucrose="" in="" candy.="" during="" this="" 1\1/2\-="" to="" 2\1/2\-yr="" study,="" subjects="" in="" the="" test="" group="" consumed="" candies="" made="" with="" hsh="" and="" chewing="" gum="" made="" with="" sorbitol.="" the="" control="" group="" consumed="" sucrose="" candies="" and="" gum.="" investigators="" monitored="" the="" intake="" of="" candies="" by="" use="" of="" coupons="" which="" the="" parents="" used="" at="" local="" stores="" to="" buy="" the="" candy.="" an="" analysis="" of="" the="" coupons="" used="" showed="" that="" parents="" of="" the="" children="" in="" the="" test="" group="" used="" a="" smaller="" number="" of="" coupons="" than="" the="" parents="" of="" the="" children="" in="" the="" control="" group.="" based="" on="" inquiries,="" the="" investigators="" discovered="" that="" the="" parents="" of="" the="" subjects="" in="" the="" hsh="" group="" had="" also="" given="" the="" children="" other="" candy="" in="" addition="" to="" hsh="" candy.="" the="" consumption="" of="" hsh="" candy="" was="" reported="" from="" 50="" to="" 75="" percent="" of="" the="" total="" candy="" consumption.="" the="" results="" showed="" no="" significant="" differences="" in="" caries="" scores="" after="" 1\1/2\="" to="" 2\1/2\="" yr="" with="" hsh="" candy="" consumption="" compared="" to="" sucrose="" candy="" consumption.="" when="" investigators="" analyzed="" the="" data="" of="" those="" children="" whose="" parents="" consumed="" the="" correct="" candy="" for="" their="" group,="" the="" differences="" in="" caries="" increment="" between="" the="" groups="" were="" still="" not="" significant="" but="" showed="" a="" trend="" towards="" a="" lower="" incidence="" of="" caries="" in="" the="" hsh="" group.="" the="" results="" of="" this="" study="" were="" confounded="" by="" poor="" compliance,="" inter-examiner="" variability,="" lack="" of="" blinding,="" and="" inconsistent="" results="" and="" do="" not="" support="" significant="" dental="" benefits="" from="" the="" use="" of="" hsh.="" glass="" (ref.="" 32)="" evaluated="" the="" cariogenicity="" of="" sorbitol="" chewing="" gum="" with="" regular="" use="" by="" children,="" ages="" 7="" to="" 11="" yr="" old,="" living="" in="" a="" nonfluoride="" area.="" in="" this="" 2-yr="" study="" subjects="" were="" randomly="" assigned="" to="" either="" a="" no-chewing="" group="" (control)="" or="" to="" the="" one="" which="" chewed="" gum="" twice="" daily.="" subjects="" in="" the="" gum="" group="" were="" provided="" two="" sticks="" of="" gum="" daily="" for="" use="" at="" school="" and="" four="" sticks="" of="" gum="" for="" use="" at="" home="" when="" school="" was="" not="" in="" session.="" the="" results="" showed="" that="" over="" the="" 2-yr="" study="" period,="" mean="" caries="" increments="" were="" 4.6="" new="" decayed="" and="" filled="" (df)="" surfaces="" for="" the="" sorbitol="" gum="" group="" (n="269)" and="" 4.7="" new="" df="" surfaces="" for="" the="" no-gum="" group="" (n="271)." the="" difference="" between="" the="" groups="" was="" not="" statistically="" significant.="" although="" the="" results="" of="" this="" study="" suggest="" that="" adding="" sorbitol-containing="" gum="" to="" the="" diet="" did="" not="" result="" in="" any="" additional="" dental="" caries,="" the="" effect="" of="" chewing="" gum="" per="" se="" on="" the="" incidence="" of="" dental="" caries="" was="" not="" considered.="" 4.="" summary="" of="" evidence="" relating="" sugar="" alcohol="" and="" dental="" caries:="" short-="" term="" studies="" ikeda="" et="" al.="" (ref.="" 33)="" evaluated="" the="" cariogenicity="" of="" maltitol="" and="" a="" polysaccharide="" alcohol="" using="" an="" intraoral="" cariogenicity="" test="" (ict)="" and="" rat="" tests.="" most="" of="" the="" details="" of="" the="" methods="" used="" in="" the="" ict="" were="" not="" provided,="" making="" the="" results="" difficult="" to="" interpret.="" bovine="" enamel="" fragments="" were="" extraorally="" dipped="" in="" 3-percent="" solutions="" of="" sucrose="" (control),="" maltitol,="" or="" the="" polysaccharide="" alcohol="" for="" 1="" min="" every="" day.="" after="" 1="" wk,="" hardness="" was="" measured.="" the="" higher="" the="" value="" for="" hardness="" means="" a="" softer="" enamel="" and="" a="" greater="" loss="" of="" enamel.="" the="" results="" showed="" a="" decalcification="" score="" for="" maltitol="" of="" 1.66="" compared="" to="" a="" score="" of="" 2.70="" for="" sucrose.="" these="" differences="" were="" significant.="" in="" the="" animal="" study,="" one="" group="" was="" provided="" a="" feed="" with="" 26-percent="" maltitol="" and="" 30-percent="" starch,="" a="" second="" group="" was="" provided="" a="" feed="" with="" sucrose="" instead="" of="" maltitol,="" and="" a="" third="" group="" consumed="" a="" diet="" without="" sucrose.="" results="" showed="" a="" caries="" score="" of="" 45.8="" for="" the="" sucrose="" group,="" 3.2="" for="" the="" maltitol="" group,="" and="" 5.2="" for="" the="" no-sucrose="" group.="" differences="" between="" the="" sucrose="" group="" and="" the="" other="" groups="" were="" statistically="" significant.="" yagi="" (ref.="" 34)="" evaluated="" the="" effects="" of="" maltitol="" on="" changes="" in="" enamel="" hardness.="" enamel="" decalcification="" was="" measured="" using="" an="" ict="" with="" a="" denture="" containing="" two="" bovine="" enamel="" slabs.="" four="" subjects="" wore="" the="" dentures="" for="" 7="" days.="" each="" day,="" one="" enamel="" slab="" was="" exposed="" to="" a="" 3-="" percent="" maltitol="" solution="" and="" the="" other="" to="" a="" 3-percent="" sucrose="" solution.="" enamel="" hardness="" was="" measured="" at="" the="" end="" of="" the="" wk.="" the="" results="" showed="" that="" the="" average="" change="" in="" hardness="" compared="" to="" pretreatment="" levels="" for="" the="" enamel="" in="" maltitol="" was="" 1.47="" micrometers="" compared="" to="" 3.35="" micrometers="" for="" the="" enamel="" in="" sucrose.="" differences="" between="" the="" two="" measurements="" were="" significant.="" the="" authors="" noted="" that="" there="" were="" considerable="" differences="" in="" individual="" responses="" to="" sucrose="" and="" maltitol.="" they="" attributed="" these="" differences="" to="" the="" oral="" environment="" (e.g.,="" plaque="" bacteria="" and="" quality="" and="" quantity="" of="" saliva).="" however,="" general="" observations="" were="" that="" sucrose="" causes="" significant="" loss="" of="" enamel,="" as="" evidenced="" by="" changes="" in="" enamel="" hardness,="" compared="" to="" the="" effect="" of="" maltitol="" on="" tooth="" enamel.="" leach="" et="" al.="" (ref.="" 35)="" evaluated="" in="" situ="" the="" effect="" on="" remineralization="" of="" artificial="" caries-like="" lesions="" in="" human="" enamel="" with="" sorbitol.="" ten="" adult="" subjects="" wore="" cast="" bands="" containing="" enamel="" on="" one="" lower="" first="" molar="" tooth="" for="" two="" 3-wk="" periods="" during="" which="" they="" continued="" to="" use="" normal="" oral="" hygiene="" procedures.="" artificial="" caries="" lesions="" were="" made="" in="" each="" enamel="" slab="" and="" covered="" with="" gauze="" to="" encourage="" the="" formation="" and="" accumulation="" of="" plaque="" on="" the="" enamel="" surface.="" subjects="" were="" given="" snack="" foods="" (chocolate="" bar,="" raisins,="" cream-filled="" wafers,="" and="" cream-filled,="" iced="" cupcake)="" and="" instructed="" to="" consume="" one="" each="" morning="" and="" afternoon="" between="" meals.="" during="" the="" first="" experimental="" period,="" subjects="" chewed,="" for="" 20="" min="" each,="" five="" sticks="" per="" day="" of="" commercial="" sugarless="" gum="" after="" meals="" and="" snacks.="" the="" gum="" was="" sweetened="" primarily="" with="" sorbitol="" and="" small="" amounts="" of="" mannitol,="" hgs,="" and="" aspartame.="" during="" the="" second="" experimental="" period,="" snacks="" were="" consumed="" but="" without="" chewing="" gum="" (control).="" [[page="" 37516]]="" the="" results="" showed="" statistically="" significant=""><0.001) remineralization="" during="" both="" experimental="" periods="" compared="" to="" the="" original="" lesion.="" the="" difference="" between="" the="" remineralization="" with="" and="" without="" gum="" was="" also="" significantly="" different=""><0.01), indicating="" overall="" promotion="" of="" remineralization="" by="" gum="" chewing.="" the="" authors="" attributed="" the="" remineralization="" during="" the="" nongum="" period="" to="" the="" presence="" of="" gauze="" used="" with="" the="" intraoral="" device="" to="" collect="" plaque.="" the="" gauze="" could="" have="" concentrated="" calcium="" and="" phosphates="" from="" the="" diet="" in="" plaque="" and="" fluoride="" from="" dentifrice.="" it="" is="" not="" known="" what="" effects="" the="" duration="" and="" timing="" of="" the="" gum="" chewing="" had="" on="" the="" results.="" without="" a="" comparison="" to="" sucrose-containing="" gum="" and="" a="" nonsweetened="" gum,="" it="" is="" not="" possible="" to="" evaluate="" the="" effect="" of="" chewing="" gum="" for="" 20="" min.="" rundegren="" et="" al.="" (ref.="" 36)="" evaluated="" in="" situ="" the="" effect="" on="" demineralization="" of="" sucrose="" substitutes="" in="" a="" 4-wk="" test.="" intraoral="" devices="" containing="" bovine="" enamel="" mounted="" on="" acrylic="" blocks="" were="" used="" with="" group="" 1.="" partial="" dentures="" with="" enamel="" slabs="" were="" used="" with="" group="" 2.="" sweeteners="" tested="" included="" 10="" percent="" solutions="" of="" sucrose,="" maltitol,="" and="" hsh.="" sucrose="" was="" used="" as="" the="" positive="" control,="" and="" 0.9-="" percent="" solution="" of="" sodium="" chloride="" was="" used="" as="" a="" negative="" control.="" subjects="" immersed="" the="" test="" sites="" of="" their="" appliances="" in="" the="" test="" sweetener="" four="" times="" a="" day="" for="" a="" 10-min="" period.="" plaque="" was="" collected="" at="" the="" end="" of="" 4="" wk="" and="" plated="" to="" determine="" the="" content="" of="" s.="" mutans.="" the="" degree="" of="" demineralization="" was="" measured="" by="" evaluating="" changes="" in="" microhardness="" of="" the="" enamel.="" the="" buffering="" capacity="" of="" whole="" saliva="" was="" evaluated="" weekly="" by="" measuring="" final="" ph="" in="" a="" mixture="" of="" 1="" ml="" of="" saliva="" and="" 3="" ml="" of="" sodium="" chloride.="" the="" results="" showed="" a="" higher="" degree="" of="" demineralization="" overall="" in="" the="" adults="" (ages="" 56="" to="" 59="" yr)="" using="" the="" partial="" dentures="" compared="" to="" students="" (age="" 19="" yr)="" using="" an="" intraoral="" device.="" results="" from="" the="" test="" (n="4)" of="" enamel="" microhardness="" in="" hsh="" versus="" sodium="" chloride="" suggest="" that="" hsh="" does="" not="" contribute="" to="" demineralization,="" and="" that="" measured="" changes="" in="" microhardness="" reflected="" the="" background="" of="" fermentable="" carbohydrates="" in="" the="" diet.="" comparing="" the="" differences="" in="" microhardness="" of="" enamel="" slabs="" between="" the="" sucrose="" and="" hsh="" diets="" and="" the="" sucrose="" and="" maltitol="" diets="" showed="" that="" sucrose="" results="" in="" significant="" demineralization="" compared="" to="" the="" sugar="" alcohols.="" creanor="" et="" al.="" (ref.="" 37)="" evaluated="" the="" effect="" of="" chewing="" gum="" for="" 20="" min="" on="" in="" situ="" enamel="" lesion="" remineralization="" compared="" to="" a="" fluoridated="" dentifrice.="" artificial="" enamel="" lesions="" were="" created="" in="" vitro="" in="" sound="" human="" enamel="" and="" mounted="" for="" wearing="" just="" opposite="" the="" lower="" first="" and="" second="" molars.="" baseline="" mineral="" contents="" were="" measured.="" subjects="" used="" a="" fluoridated="" dentifrice="" twice="" daily="" and="" maintained="" their="" regular="" diets.="" six="" subjects="" chewed="" five="" sticks="" of="" chewing="" gum="" containing="" sorbitol="" and="" some="" hgs="" and="" aspartame="" after="" each="" meal="" and="" snack.="" the="" gum="" was="" chewed="" for="" 20="" min="" in="" order="" to="" minimize="" any="" deleterious="" effects="" of="" sucrose.="" six="" other="" subjects="" received="" no="" gum="" and="" served="" as="" the="" control.="" at="" the="" end="" of="" 7="" wk,="" the="" test="" subjects="" became="" the="" control="" group,="" and="" the="" control="" subjects="" became="" the="" new="" test="" group.="" the="" new="" test="" group="" then="" chewed="" sucrose-containing="" gum="" for="" 7="" wk.="" the="" results="" showed="" that="" after="" using="" sugar-free="" gum="" for="" 7="" wk,="" the="" degree="" of="" mineral="" loss="" for="" the="" enamel="" corresponded="" to="" a="" remineralization="" value="" of="" 18.2="" percent.="" after="" 7="" wk="" of="" chewing="" sucrose="" gum,="" the="" percent="" remineralization="" was="" calculated="" to="" be="" 18.3="" percent.="" the="" difference="" between="" the="" sorbitol="" and="" sucrose="" gum="" groups="" was="" not="" significant.="" results="" of="" this="" study="" suggest="" that="" chewing="" gum="" for="" 20="" min,="" regardless="" of="" the="" sweetener,="" can="" be="" beneficial="" to="" dental="" health.="" a="" common="" problem="" in="" studies="" evaluating="" the="" dental="" health="" benefits="" of="" sugar="" alcohol-containing="" chewing="" gum="" is="" the="" absence="" of="" an="" appropriate="" control="" group.="" most="" of="" the="" studies="" that="" have="" been="" done="" use="" a="" control="" group="" that="" does="" not="" chew="" gum.="" ideally,="" to="" evaluate="" the="" relationship="" of="" sugar="" alcohol-sweetened="" chewing="" gum="" in="" not="" promoting="" dental="" caries,="" the="" control="" group="" would="" chew="" an="" unsweetened="" gum="" product.="" such="" a="" group="" is="" needed="" to="" take="" into="" consideration="" the="" effects="" of="" chewing="" gum="" itself="" on="" the="" endpoint="" measure,="" e.g.,="" plaque="" ph="" or="" plaque="" acid="" production.="" chewing="" gum="" is="" known="" to="" stimulate="" saliva,="" which="" can="" help="" neutralize="" oral="" acids,="" raise="" plaque="" ph,="" and="" help="" to="" promote="" enamel="" remineralization="" in="" some="" circumstances.="" it="" would="" be="" considered="" unethical="" by="" standards="" in="" the="" united="" states="" to="" use="" a="" control="" group="" that="" chews="" sucrose-containing="" gum="" and,="" as="" a="" consequence,="" puts="" the="" subjects="" at="" risk="" of="" dental="" disease,="" in="" order="" to="" compare="" the="" incidence="" of="" dental="" caries="" to="" that="" from="" a="" sugar="" alcohol-containing="" gum.="" the="" few="" long-term="" caries="" field="" trials="" that="" were="" submitted="" with="" this="" petition="" show="" how="" multiple="" problems="" in="" the="" execution="" of="" clinical="" studies="" can="" easily="" confound="" the="" results.="" problems="" often="" include="" subject="" compliance,="" reporting="" and="" control="" of="" dietary="" intake,="" selection="" of="" appropriate="" control="" foods,="" inter-="" and="" intraexaminer="" variability,="" subject="" attrition,="" and="" inability="" to="" blind="" the="" study.="" the="" majority="" of="" these="" trials="" compared="" sucrose="" consumers="" to="" individuals="" who="" had="" partial="" or="" complete="" substitution="" of="" sugar="" alcohols="" for="" sucrose.="" the="" results="" consistently="" demonstrated="" significantly="" fewer="" caries="" in="" the="" group="" consuming="" sugar="" alcohols="" than="" in="" the="" group="" consuming="" sucrose.="" although="" the="" relationship="" between="" some="" of="" the="" sugar="" alcohols="" and="" promotion="" of="" dental="" caries="" has="" not="" been="" well="" studied="" in="" humans,="" it="" is="" becoming="" increasingly="" evident="" that="" sugar="" alcohols,="" when="" substituted="" for="" sucrose="" and="" other="" fermentable="" carbohydrates,="" may="" provide="" important="" dental="" health="" benefits="" for="" the="" consumers="" of="" those="" products.="" d.="" animal="" studies="" fda="" reviewed="" over="" 20="" animal="" studies="" investigating="" the="" effects="" of="" sugar="" alcohol="" consumption="" on="" the="" incidence="" of="" dental="" caries="" or="" on="" the="" acidogenic="" potential="" of="" dental,="" s.="" mutans,="" or="" mixed="" oral="" microorganisms.="" most="" of="" the="" animal="" studies="" that="" have="" been="" done="" to="" test="" the="" effect="" of="" sugar="" alcohols="" on="" the="" incidence="" of="" caries="" were="" programmed="" feeding="" studies="" using="" weanling="" rats.="" the="" animals="" were="" usually="" divided="" into="" groups="" and="" fed="" diets="" containing="" different="" test="" sweeteners.="" the="" control="" diets="" were="" either="" a="" basal="" diet="" with="" no="" carbohydrate="" sweeteners="" or="" sugar="" substitutes="" or="" a="" basal="" diet="" with="" added="" sucrose.="" the="" test="" diets="" were="" administered="" over="" a="" period="" of="" weeks,="" increasing="" the="" sugar="" substitute="" concentration="" slowly="" to="" allow="" the="" animals="" time="" to="" adapt="" to="" the="" specific="" sweetener="" and="" to="" minimize="" the="" severity="" of="" diarrhea,="" a="" side="" effect="" of="" sugar="" alcohol="" consumption="" that="" increases="" with="" increasing="" concentration="" of="" the="" sugar="" alcohol.="" investigators="" also="" evaluated="" the="" general="" health="" and="" growth="" of="" the="" animals="" during="" the="" experimental="" period.="" many="" animals,="" and="" rats="" in="" particular,="" do="" not="" like="" the="" taste="" of="" sugar="" alcohols="" and,="" therefore,="" will="" eat="" less="" of="" the="" test="" diet="" and="" increase="" their="" intake="" of="" water.="" most="" investigators="" monitored="" the="" animals'="" total="" dietary="" intake="" to="" ensure="" that="" consumption="" patterns="" were="" similar="" between="" the="" control="" and="" test="" animals.="" a="" potential="" confounding="" factor="" in="" these="" studies="" is="" the="" effect="" of="" total="" food="" and="" water="" intake="" on="" caries="" development.="" if="" animals="" consume="" less="" of="" a="" sugar="" alcohol="" diet="" compared="" to="" the="" control="" animals="" consuming="" a="" sucrose="" diet,="" any="" significant="" differences="" in="" caries="" incidence="" may="" actually="" be="" attributable="" to="" the="" differences="" in="" food="" and="" water="" consumption="" and="" not="" to="" an="" effect="" of="" the="" sugar="" substitute.="" some="" studies="" reported="" a="" lower="" survival="" rate="" in="" animals="" on="" the="" [[page="" 37517]]="" sugar="" alcohol="" diets.="" this="" finding="" made="" interpretation="" of="" the="" results="" more="" difficult="" because="" of="" uneven="" group="" sizes.="" in="" order="" to="" promote="" the="" cariogenic="" process,="" the="" animals="" were="" inoculated="" with="" either="" mixed="" strains="" of="" plaque="" bacteria="" or="" purified="" strains="" of="" s.="" mutans="" and="" other="" microorganisms="" found="" in="" dental="" plaque.="" experimental="" periods="" lasted,="" on="" the="" whole,="" for="" 60="" to="" 70="" days.="" these="" periods="" included="" the="" time="" given="" for="" the="" animals="" to="" adapt="" to="" the="" test="" diets.="" havenaar="" et="" al.="" (ref.="" 52)="" fed="" s.="" mutans="" inoculated="" rats="" one="" of="" six="" diets="" 18="" times="" a="" day:="" the="" basal="" diet="" plus="" 50-percent="" starch,="" or="" the="" basal="" diet="" plus="" 30-percent="" starch="" and="" 20="" percent="" of="" either="" sucrose,="" hsh's,="" xylitol,="" sorbitol,="" or="" l-sorbose.="" in="" a="" second="" experiment,="" the="" rats="" were="" fed="" the="" same="" diets="" 14="" times="" a="" day="" and="" alternated="" with="" the="" basal="" diet="" containing="" 20-percent="" sucrose="" and="" 10-percent="" glucose="" (four="" times="" a="" day).="" in="" both="" experiments,="" the="" starch,="" hsh,="" xylitol,="" and="" l-="" sorbose="" groups="" showed="" significantly="" less="" fissure="" lesions="" than="" the="" sorbitol="" and="" sucrose="" groups.="" the="" sorbitol="" group="" showed="" significantly="" less="" fissure="" caries="" in="" the="" mandibular="" molars="" with="" respect="" to="" the="" severity="" of="" the="" lesions="" compared="" to="" the="" sucrose="" group.="" havenaar="" et="" al.="" (ref.="" 53)="" in="" five="" successive="" experiments,="" fed="" rats="" ad="" libitum="" on="" diets="" containing="" sucrose="" or="" hsh="" 80/55.="" in="" each="" experiment,="" the="" rats="" were="" inoculated="" with="" plaque="" from="" rats="" in="" the="" previous="" experiment="" (ref.="" 52).="" results="" showed="" that="" compared="" to="" sucrose,="" hsh="" was="" relatively="" noncariogenic.="" the="" incidence="" of="" fissure="" caries="" in="" the="" mandibular="" molars="" for="" rats="" consuming="" 20-percent="" sucrose="" was="" 13.1,="" whereas="" the="" fissure="" caries="" incidence="" in="" rats="" consuming="" 20-percent="" hsh="" was="" 1.5="" to="" 2.5=""><0.001). havenaar="" et="" al.="" (ref.="" 54)="" evaluated="" the="" usefulness="" of="" diets="" for="" testing="" the="" caries="" promoting="" or="" inhibiting="" properties="" of="" sugar="" substitutes.="" the="" investigators="" fed="" two="" groups="" of="" rats="" experimental="" diet="" 2000="" containing="" 50-percent="" sucrose="" and="" 14-percent="" starch="" or="" 50-percent="" sucrose,="" 9-percent="" starch,="" and="" 5-percent="" xylitol="" for="" a="" period="" of="" 42="" days.="" results="" showed="" no="" significant="" differences="" in="" caries="" incidence="" between="" the="" sucrose="" starch,="" the="" xylitol="" group="" and="" the="" sucrose="" and="" starch="" group.="" in="" another="" experiment="" animals="" were="" fed="" diet="" ssp="" 20/5="" containing="" 20-percent="" sucrose,="" 5-percent="" glucose,="" and="" 25-percent="" starch="" or="" 20-percent="" sucrose,="" 5-percent="" glucose,="" 20-percent="" starch,="" and="" 5-="" percent="" xylitol="" for="" a="" period="" of="" 66="" days.="" results="" showed="" the="" xylitol,="" sucrose,="" and="" starch="" group="" to="" have="" significantly="" fewer="" caries="" (12.3="" caries="" versus="" 14.8)="" compared="" to="" the="" sucrose,="" starch,="" and="" glucose="" group.="" havenaar="" and="" coworkers="" (ref.="" 55)="" fed="" one="" group="" of="" rats="" a="" basal="" diet="" containing="" 20-percent="" sucrose,="" 5-percent="" glucose,="" and="" 25-percent="" starch.="" the="" test="" group="" received="" the="" basal="" diet="" with="" 20-percent="" starch="" and="" 5-percent="" xylitol="" and="" fluoride.="" after="" 54,="" 75,="" or="" 96="" days,="" rats="" were="" crossed="" over="" to="" the="" other="" diet="" for="" an="" additional="" 21="" to="" 42="" days.="" results="" showed="" that="" the="" xylitol="" group="" had="" significantly="" fewer="" fissure="" caries="" than="" the="" sucrose="" group.="" the="" authors="" also="" reported="" that="" the="" longer="" the="" experimental="" period,="" the="" more="" severe="" the="" caries,="" irrespective="" of="" the="" presence="" of="" xylitol.="" after="" crossover,="" total="" numbers="" of="" caries="" did="" not="" change,="" but="" the="" xylitol="" group="" showed="" significantly="" fewer="" initial="" lesions="" compared="" with="" the="" mean="" caries="" incidence="" in="" the="" sucrose="" group="" on="" day="" 54.="" grenby="" and="" colley="" (ref.="" 56)="" fed="" a="" control="" group="" of="" rats="" a="" cariogenic="" diet="" containing="" 46-percent="" sucrose="" and="" fed="" two="" test="" groups="" the="" same="" cariogenic="" diet="" either="" with="" 20="" percent="" of="" the="" sucrose="" replaced="" with="" xylitol,="" sorbitol,="" mannitol,="" or="" wheat="" starch="" (experiment="" a).="" the="" animals="" consuming="" sorbitol="" and="" mannitol="" did="" not="" remain="" healthy="" during="" the="" experiment,="" so="" this="" part="" of="" the="" experiment="" was="" terminated.="" the="" animals="" consuming="" xylitol="" also="" experienced="" difficult="" health="" effects="" at="" first="" but="" later="" improved="" and="" were="" returned="" to="" the="" 20-percent="" xylitol="" diet.="" in="" experiment="" b="" there="" were="" only="" two="" diets:="" a="" cariogenic="" diet="" with="" 46-percent="" sucrose="" and="" an="" experimental="" diet="" with="" 10="" percent="" of="" the="" sucrose="" in="" the="" diet="" replaced="" with="" xylitol.="" in="" experiment="" a,="" significantly="" fewer="" caries="" were="" experienced="" only="" in="" the="" group="" consuming="" the="" sucrose="" and="" xylitol="" diet="" compared="" to="" the="" control="" group.="" in="" experiment="" b,="" the="" level="" of="" caries="" was="" high="" for="" both="" the="" sucrose="" group="" and="" the="" sucrose="" and="" xylitol="" group.="" the="" overall="" caries="" scores="" were="" not="" significantly="" different.="" karle="" and="" gehring="" (ref.="" 57)="" evaluated="" the="" effect="" of="" sugar="" alcohols="" and="" sucrose="" on="" both="" xerostomized="" (salivary="" glands="" removed)="" and="" nonxerostomized="" rats.="" the="" control="" group="" consumed="" a="" basal="" diet="" without="" sweetener.="" test="" groups="" received="" the="" basal="" diet="" plus="" sucrose,="" xylitol,="" isomalt,="" or="" other="" sweeteners.="" sweetener="" concentrations="" were="" increased="" over="" a="" 3-wk="" period="" to="" a="" level="" of="" 30="" percent="" of="" the="" diet.="" the="" xerostomized="" rats="" had="" more="" caries="" with="" all="" substances="" than="" the="" nonxerostomized="" rats.="" sucrose="" was="" shown="" to="" be="" the="" most="" cariogenic="" sweetener,="" and="" xylitol="" the="" least="" cariogenic,="" in="" the="" nonxerostomized="" rats.="" both="" the="" xylitol="" and="" isomalt="" groups="" had="" significantly="" fewer="" caries="" than="" the="" sucrose="" group.="" muhlemann="" and="" coworkers="" (ref.="" 58)="" compared="" the="" cariogenicity="" of="" diet="" 2000="" (containing="" 64-percent="" wheat="" flour)="" to="" the="" same="" diet="" containing="" xylitol="" or="" sorbitol="" (15="" percent="" and="" 25="" percent="" of="" the="" flour="" replaced)="" or="" sucrose="" (15="" percent="" and="" 25="" percent="" of="" the="" flour="" replaced).="" sweetener="" mixtures="" containing="" 15-percent="" sucrose="" and="" 15-percent="" xylitol="" or="" sorbitol="" and="" 25-percent="" sucrose="" and="" 25-percent="" xylitol="" or="" sorbitol="" were="" also="" substituted="" for="" the="" flour="" ingredient="" of="" the="" basal="" diet.="" the="" rats="" consuming="" diets="" with="" 15-="" and="" 25-percent="" sucrose="" experienced="" 17.3="" and="" 17.8="" smooth="" surface="" caries,="" respectively.="" rats="" consuming="" animal="" chow="" with="" 15-percent="" xylitol="" or="" sorbitol="" experienced="" 0.0="" and="" 1.9="" smooth="" surface="" caries,="" respectively.="" the="" caries="" score="" for="" the="" control="" group="" was="" 4.9.="" the="" highest="" number="" of="" fissure="" caries="" (11.3)="" occurred="" in="" the="" 25-percent="" sucrose="" group.="" the="" control="" group="" had="" 5.1="" lesions.="" substituting="" xylitol="" (25="" percent)="" in="" the="" diet="" resulted="" in="" fewer="" caries="" (0.2)="" compared="" to="" the="" control,="" but="" differences="" were="" not="" significant.="" twenty-five="" percent="" sorbitol="" in="" the="" diet="" produced="" a="" caries="" score="" of="" 2.8.="" shyu="" and="" hsu="" (ref.="" 59)="" evaluated="" the="" cariogenicity="" of="" 10-percent="" xylitol,="" mannitol,="" sorbitol,="" and="" sucrose="" in="" rats="" fed="" a="" plain="" basal="" diet.="" a="" control="" group="" was="" fed="" the="" basal="" diet="" without="" sweetener.="" caries="" evaluations="" were="" made="" on="" the="" 45th="" and="" 90th="" days="" of="" feeding.="" the="" xylitol="" group="" had="" 86="" percent="" fewer="" caries="" (significant)="" compared="" to="" the="" sucrose="" group="" and="" 76="" percent="" fewer="" caries="" than="" the="" control.="" the="" mannitol="" group="" experienced="" 70="" and="" 51="" percent="" fewer="" caries="" than="" the="" sucrose="" and="" control="" groups,="" respectively.="" the="" sorbitol="" group="" experienced="" 48="" and="" 14="" percent="" fewer="" caries="" than="" the="" sucrose="" and="" control="" groups,="" respectively.="" bramstedt="" et="" al.="" (ref.="" 60)="" evaluated="" the="" cariogenicity="" of="" isomalt,="" xylitol,="" and="" sucrose="" in="" 60="" rats="" divided="" into="" five="" groups.="" the="" control="" diet="" was="" a="" basic="" diet="" containing="" half="" synthetic="" feed.="" another="" control="" group="" received="" a="" special="" basic="" diet="" containing="" no="" low="" molecular="" weight="" carbohydrates.="" the="" test="" groups="" received="" the="" basic="" diet="" with="" increasing="" doses="" of="" sweetener="" up="" to="" 30="" percent="" of="" the="" diet.="" the="" sucrose="" group="" had="" a="" significantly="" higher="" number="" of="" caries="" than="" either="" of="" the="" sugar="" alcohol="" groups.="" the="" group="" consuming="" the="" special="" basic="" diet="" had="" the="" lowest="" incidence="" of="" caries.="" there="" were="" no="" significant="" differences="" in="" the="" number="" of="" caries="" between="" the="" basic="" diet,="" xylitol,="" and="" isomalt="" groups,="" although="" the="" isomalt="" group="" showed="" a="" slightly="" higher="" incidence="" of="" caries.="" izumiya="" et="" al.="" (ref.="" 61)="" fed="" rats="" 10="" or="" 20="" percent="" by="" weight="" of="" sweeteners="" in="" [[page="" 37518]]="" feed.="" rats="" consuming="" a="" dietary="" feed="" containing="" 10-percent="" maltitol="" had="" significantly="" fewer="" caries="" than="" the="" sucrose="" group.="" details="" of="" this="" study="" and="" the="" results="" were="" not="" given="" in="" this="" reference.="" gehring="" and="" karle="" (ref.="" 62)="" evaluated="" the="" cariogenic="" properties="" of="" isomalt,="" in="" comparison="" to="" those="" of="" sucrose="" and="" xylitol="" in="" the="" basal="" diet="" of="" conventional="" and="" gnotobiotic="" (i.e.,="" specially="" reared="" laboratory="" animals="" in="" which="" the="" microflora="" are="" specifically="" known)="" rats.="" the="" final="" concentration="" of="" sweetener="" in="" the="" feed="" was="" 30="" percent.="" a="" second="" experiment="" was="" performed="" using="" isomalt,="" xylitol,="" sorbitol,="" and="" sucrose="" in="" chocolate.="" the="" basal="" diet="" constituted="" 40="" percent="" of="" the="" total="" diet,="" and="" the="" chocolate="" constituted="" 60="" percent.="" the="" isomalt="" group="" had="" significantly="" fewer="" caries="" than="" the="" sucrose="" group,="" and="" the="" xylitol="" group="" had="" significantly="" fewer="" caries="" than="" the="" isomalt="" group.="" the="" second="" experiment="" showed="" significant="" differences="" in="" caries="" experience="" after="" the="" t="" (initial="" caries="" lesions)="" and="" b="" (advanced="" caries)="" stages="" between="" the="" sucrose="" and="" sorbitol="" chocolate="" groups,="" the="" sorbitol="" and="" isomalt="" chocolate="" groups,="" and="" also="" between="" the="" isomalt="" and="" xylitol="" chocolate="" group.="" the="" order="" of="" cariogenicity="" of="" the="" test="" substances="" was="" sucrose="" greater="" than="" (="">) sorbitol > isomalt > xylitol > control. An in vitro 
    microbiological experiment was performed to test acid production 
    capacity of plaque microorganisms in 10 percent solutions of isomalt, 
    glucopyranosido mannitol (GPM), glucopyranosido sorbitol (GPS), 
    sorbitol, mannitol, sucrose, and fructose. GPS and GPM are the two 
    components that make up isomalt. Sucrose produced acid rapidly and had 
    the greatest acid formation. Sorbitol and mannitol produced acid 
    slowly, and isomalt and its two components had practically no acid 
    production in vitro.
        Karle and Gehring (Ref. 63) evaluated the cariogenicity of isomalt 
    in rats. Six groups of rats received the basic diet without low 
    molecular weight carbohydrates in addition to xylitol, sorbose, 
    isomalt, lactose, and sucrose. The control group received only the 
    basic diet. Sweetener concentrations were increased slowly up to 30 
    percent by weight of the basic feed. The highest number of fissure 
    caries were caused by sucrose (about 33) followed by lactose (25), 
    isomalt (about 13), sorbose (about 12), xylitol (about 7) and the 
    control (5). Differences in caries incidence between the sucrose and 
    the other groups were significant.
        Larje and Larson (Ref. 64) fed rats a caries diet, diet 2000, to 
    which various sweeteners were added. The caries diet, containing 56 
    percent sucrose, was used as a control ration. Sucrose substitutes used 
    in at least one of the experiments included glucose, fructose, 
    mannitol, sorbitol, potato starch, starch/sucrose mixtures, or HPS 
    (contains sorbitol and hydrogenated dextrins). In the first experiment 
    each group was fed diet 2000 for a few days, then they were changed to 
    one of the diets containing a sucrose substitute. Each test diet was 
    fed for 7 out of every 14 days followed by rotation back to the control 
    diet. The diets were changed every 2 or 3 days according to a 
    predetermined schedule. A second experiment was designed to determine 
    the effect of feeding the sucrose diet after the period of bacterial 
    implantation on diets containing sucrose substitutes. The animals 
    consumed one of the test diets the first week while being inoculated 
    with S. mutans, followed in the final 7 wk by the control diet 
    containing sucrose. A third experiment was designed to determine the 
    effect of feeding sucrose and sucrose-substitute diets intermittently 
    after the period of bacterial implantation on the sucrose diet. The 
    animals consumed diet 2000 the first wk, followed in the final 7 wk by 
    diets containing the sugar substitutes.
        The results of the first experiment showed significantly (p<0.001) fewer="" smooth="" surface="" caries="" with="" all="" sugar="" alcohols,="" potato="" starch,="" dextrose,="" and="" hydrogenated="" starch="" compared="" to="" the="" sucrose="" group.="" significantly=""><0.05) fewer="" sulcal="" caries="" were="" experienced="" in="" the="" groups="" receiving="" mannitol,="" sorbitol="" plus="" starch,="" potato="" starch,="" and="" hps="" compared="" to="" the="" sucrose="" group.="" the="" authors="" observed="" that="" in="" all="" of="" the="" experiments,="" every="" group="" in="" which="" sucrose="" was="" restricted,="" whether="" by="" dietary="" substitution="" or="" by="" shortened="" feeding="" periods,="" developed="" significantly="" fewer="" caries="" on="" smooth="" surfaces="" compared="" to="" the="" sucrose="" control="" animals.="" the="" animals="" in="" the="" mannitol,="" sorbitol="" plus="" starch,="" and="" sorbitol="" groups="" consumed="" less="" food="" during="" the="" test="" period="" compared="" to="" the="" sucrose="" controls.="" the="" authors="" stated="" that="" food="" consumption="" and="" weight="" gains="" were="" directly="" related="" to="" the="" incidence="" of="" caries.="" the="" results="" of="" experiment="" 2="" showed="" significantly=""><0.001) fewer="" smooth="" surface="" caries="" in="" groups="" fed="" hydrogenated="" starch,="" potato="" starch,="" dextrose,="" fructose,="" sorbitol="" plus="" starch,="" dextrose="" plus="" fructose="" compared="" to="" the="" sucrose="" group.="" groups="" receiving="" hps,="" fructose,="" and="" sorbitol="" plus="" starch="" experienced="" significantly=""><0.001) fewer="" sulcal="" caries="" compared="" to="" the="" sucrose="" group.="" the="" results="" of="" experiment="" 3="" showed="" significantly=""><0.001) fewer="" smooth="" surface="" caries="" in="" groups="" receiving="" potato="" starch,="" fructose,="" sorbitol="" plus="" starch,="" dextrose="" plus="" fructose,="" dextrose,="" and="" hydrogenated="" starch="" compared="" to="" the="" sucrose="" group.="" the="" overall="" results="" showed="" that="" reducing="" the="" exposure="" to="" sucrose="" results="" in="" fewer="" carious="" lesions.="" muhlemann="" (ref.="" 65)="" tested="" the="" effects="" of="" topical="" applications="" of="" sugar="" substitutes="" on="" caries="" incidence="" and="" bacterial="" agglomerate="" formation="" in="" rats="" receiving="" a="" cariogenic="" diet="" containing="" 20-percent="" sucrose.="" sweeteners="" tested="" (50="" percent="" w/v)="" included="" the="" following:="" sucrose,="" mannitol,="" gps,="" gpm,="" isomalt,="" sorbitol,="" maltitol,="" and="" french="" hsh.="" three="" control="" groups="" were="" used:="" (1)="" one="" group="" received="" the="" cariogenic="" diet="" (20-percent="" sucrose)="" and="" no="" topical="" applications,="" (2)="" the="" second="" group="" received="" a="" topical="" application="" of="" water="" with="" the="" cariogenic="" diet,="" and="" (3)="" the="" third="" group="" was="" treated="" topically="" with="" chlorhexidin="" digluconate="" (0.5="" percent)="" as="" a="" positive="" control.="" topical="" solutions="" were="" applied="" five="" times="" a="" day="" for="" 23="" days.="" among="" the="" carbohydrates="" treatments,="" the="" isomalt,="" gps,="" and="" gpm="" groups="" had="" the="" lowest="" incidence="" of="" fissure="" and="" smooth="" surface="" caries.="" the="" differences,="" however,="" between="" the="" caries="" incidence="" in="" these="" three="" groups="" and="" the="" other="" test="" groups="" were="" not="" statistically="" significant.="" the="" incidence="" of="" caries="" in="" the="" chlorhexidine="" control="" group="" was="" statistically="" significantly="" lower="" than="" all="" treatment="" groups.="" the="" control="" groups="" receiving="" no="" application="" and="" water="" both="" experienced="" slightly="" more="" caries="" than="" the="" sugar="" alcohol="" groups.="" results="" of="" these="" studies="" suggest="" that="" in="" the="" presence="" of="" a="" cariogenic="" diet,="" topical="" application="" of="" mannitol,="" isomalt,="" sorbitol,="" maltitol,="" or="" hsh="" does="" not="" affect="" the="" promotion="" by="" sucrose="" of="" dental="" caries="" in="" rats.="" ooshima="" et="" al.="" (ref.="" 66)="" evaluated="" the="" cariogenicity="" of="" maltitol="" in="" rats="" infected="" with="" s.="" mutans.="" animals="" were="" divided="" into="" 12="" groups.="" group="" a="" received="" a="" control="" diet="" containing="" 56-percent="" wheat="" flour.="" groups="" b="" through="" l="" received="" the="" same="" diet="" as="" the="" control="" group="" but="" had="" portions="" of="" the="" wheat="" flour="" replaced="" with="" one="" of="" the="" test="" substances.="" the="" sweeteners="" tested="" were="" as="" follows:="" 10-percent="" maltitol="" plus="" 46-="" percent="" wheat="" flour="" (group="" b),="" 20-percent="" maltitol="" plus="" 36-percent="" wheat="" flour="" (group="" c),="" 10-percent="" sucrose="" plus="" 46-percent="" wheat="" flour="" (group="" d),="" 10-percent="" sucrose="" plus="" 10-percent="" maltitol="" plus="" 36-percent="" wheat="" flour="" (group="" e),="" 20-percent="" sucrose="" plus="" 36-percent="" wheat="" flour="" (group="" f),="" 20-percent="" sucrose="" plus="" 20-percent="" maltitol="" plus="" [[page="" 37519]]="" 16-percent="" wheat="" flour="" (group="" g),="" 24-percent="" sucrose="" plus="" 32-percent="" wheat="" flour="" (group="" h),="" 24-percent="" sucrose="" plus="" 16-percent="" maltitol="" plus="" 16-percent="" wheat="" flour="" (group="" i),="" 28-percent="" sucrose="" plus="" 28-percent="" wheat="" flour="" (group="" j),="" 28-percent="" sucrose="" plus="" 12-percent="" maltitol="" plus="" 16-percent="" wheat="" flour="" (group="" k),="" or="" 40-percent="" sucrose="" plus="" 12-percent="" wheat="" flour="" (group="" l).="" the="" results="" of="" this="" study="" showed="" that="" the="" maltitol="" did="" not="" induce="" dental="" caries="" in="" groups="" b="" and="" c="" compared="" to="" the="" wheat="" flour="" alone="" (group="" a).="" groups="" a,="" b,="" and="" c="" experienced="" significantly=""><0.001) fewer="" caries="" than="" the="" sucrose="" group="" (group="" l).="" groups="" d="" through="" i="" and="" k="" reported="" significantly=""><0.001 and=""><0.01, respectively)="" fewer="" caries="" than="" group="" l.="" there="" was="" no="" significant="" difference="" in="" caries="" score="" between="" group="" j="" (equal="" parts="" sucrose="" and="" wheat="" flour)="" and="" group="" l.="" thus,="" this="" study="" suggests="" that="" replacing="" sucrose="" with="" less="" cariogenic="" sweeteners="" or="" wheat="" flour="" results="" in="" fewer="" dental="" caries="" in="" rats.="" tate="" et.="" al.="" (ref.="" 67)="" reported="" on="" the="" correlations="" between="" progressive="" caries="" and="" sugar="" intake="" in="" hamsters="" inoculated="" with="" s.="" mutans.="" animals="" were="" fed="" a="" diet="" with="" 10-percent="" sucrose="" (group="" 1),="" 20-="" percent="" sucrose="" (group="" 2),="" 10-percent="" sucrose="" plus="" 10-percent="" maltitol="" (group="" 3),="" 10-percent="" sucrose="" plus="" 10-percent="" coupling="" sugar="" (group="" 4),="" 10-percent="" maltitol="" (group="" 5),="" or="" 10-percent="" coupling="" sugar="" (group="" 6).="" group="" 2="" experienced="" the="" most="" caries.="" there="" was="" no="" significant="" difference="" in="" caries="" score="" between="" group="" 1="" and="" groups="" 3="" and="" 4.="" groups="" 5="" and="" 6="" had="" significantly=""><0.01) fewer="" caries="" than="" groups="" 1="" or="" 2.="" this="" reference="" did="" not="" provide="" sufficient="" details="" regarding="" the="" methodology="" and="" analysis="" of="" results="" for="" purposes="" of="" evaluating="" the="" weight="" of="" the="" results.="" leach="" and="" green="" (ref.="" 68)="" fed="" two="" groups="" of="" rats="" a="" basal="" diet="" supplemented="" with="" sucrose="" plus="" 3-percent="" xylitol="" or="" 6-percent="" xylitol.="" the="" control="" group="" consumed="" the="" basal="" diet="" with="" sucrose.="" in="" experiment="" 1,="" rats="" were="" continuously="" fed="" the="" same="" diet="" during="" the="" experimental="" period.="" in="" experiment="" 2,="" rats="" were="" fed="" diets="" alternating="" between="" the="" control="" diet="" one="" day="" and="" the="" test="" diet="" the="" next="" day.="" in="" experiment="" 1,="" rats="" fed="" the="" sucrose="" and="" 6-percent="" xylitol="" mixture="" had="" significantly=""><0.02) fewer="" fissure="" caries="" than="" the="" control.="" there="" were="" no="" significant="" differences="" in="" the="" xylitol="" mixture="" groups.="" in="" experiment="" 2,="" both="" xylitol="" mixture="" diet="" groups="" had="" significantly=""><0.001) fewer="" fissure="" caries="" than="" the="" control.="" there="" were="" no="" significant="" differences="" among="" the="" xylitol="" mixture="" groups.="" mukasa="" (ref.="" 69)="" evaluated="" the="" cariogenicity="" of="" maltitol="" and="" se58="" in="" rats.="" product="" se58="" is="" a="" highly="" purified="" corn="" starch="" treated="" with="" enzyme="" and="" hydrogenated.="" it="" contains="" 20-="" to="" 25-percent="" sorbitol,="" 20-="" to="" 30-percent="" maltitol,="" 15-="" to="" 25-percent="" maltotrititol,="" and="" 30-="" to="" 40-="" percent="" maltopentaitol.="" in="" experiment="" one,="" three="" groups="" of="" rats="" were="" fed="" diet="" 2000="" containing="" either="" 56-percent="" sucrose,="" maltitol,="" or="" se58,="" among="" other="" ingredients.="" because="" the="" rats="" consuming="" the="" maltitol="" and="" se58="" diets="" experienced="" serious="" growth="" problems,="" experiment="" one="" was="" discontinued.="" in="" experiment="" two,="" the="" level="" of="" all="" sweeteners="" in="" diet="" 2000="" was="" reduced="" to="" 26="" percent,="" with="" the="" remaining="" 30="" percent="" as="" added="" corn="" starch.="" the="" sucrose="" group="" had="" a="" mean="" fissure="" caries="" score="" of="" 31.5="" and="" a="" smooth="" surface="" caries="" score="" of="" 14.1.="" the="" maltitol="" group="" had="" 3.1="" fissure="" caries="" and="" no="" smooth="" surface="" caries.="" the="" se58="" group="" had="" 4.6="" fissure="" caries="" and="" 0.5="" smooth="" surface="" caries.="" differences="" between="" the="" sucrose="" group="" and="" each="" sugar="" alcohol="" group="" were="" significant.="" van="" der="" hoeven="" (ref.="" 70)="" evaluated="" the="" cariogenicity="" of="" isomalt="" in="" rats.="" test="" diets="" consisted="" of="" a="" base="" diet="" containing="" 16-percent="" sucrose="" and="" 44-percent="" wheat="" flour="" and="" a="" base="" diet="" with="" 16-percent="" isomalt="" and="" 44-percent="" wheat="" flour.="" the="" control="" diet="" consisted="" of="" 60-percent="" wheat="" flour="" and="" no="" added="" sweetener.="" diets="" were="" offered="" ad="" libitum="" over="" a="" period="" of="" 14="" wk.="" results="" showed="" increasing="" incidence="" of="" dentinal="" fissure="" lesions="" in="" the="" sucrose="" group="" (wk="" 2="4;" wk="" 14="14" lesions)="" and="" almost="" no="" caries="" in="" the="" isomalt="" group="" (wk="" 2="0;" wk="" 8="4;" wk="" 14="1" lesion).="" there="" was="" no="" difference="" in="" the="" incidence="" of="" caries="" between="" the="" isomalt="" and="" the="" control="" groups.="" van="" der="" hoeven="" (ref.="" 73)="" evaluated="" the="" cariogenicity="" of="" lactitol="" in="" program-fed="" rats.="" the="" sweetener="" was="" incorporated="" into="" a="" powdered="" diet,="" described="" by="" havenaar="" et="" al.="" (ref.="" 54),="" consisting="" of="" a="" basic="" part="" (50="" percent),="" wheat="" flour="" (25-percent),="" and="" test="" substance="" (25-percent).="" lactitol="" was="" compared="" with="" sorbitol,="" xylitol,="" sucrose,="" and="" a="" control="" with="" wheat="" flour="" in="" addition="" to="" the="" basic="" part.="" the="" animals="" received="" 9="" g="" of="" diet="" divided="" into="" 18="" portions="" of="" 0.5="" g="" each="" per="" day.="" the="" animals="" on="" the="" xylitol="" and="" sorbitol="" diets="" were="" reported="" to="" experience="" reduced="" weight="" gains="" and="" a="" reduced="" appearance="" of="" the="" fur.="" none="" of="" the="" animals="" suffered="" from="" diarrhea.="" there="" were="" significantly="" fewer="" caries="" in="" the="" xylitol,="" lactitol,="" sorbitol,="" and="" wheat="" flour="" groups="" compared="" to="" the="" sucrose="" group.="" the="" incidence="" of="" caries="" in="" the="" lactitol="" and="" sorbitol="" groups="" was="" slightly,="" but="" not="" significantly,="" higher="" than="" in="" the="" wheat="" flour="" group.="" the="" incidence="" of="" caries="" was="" lowest="" in="" the="" xylitol="" group.="" in="" a="" twofold="" experiment="" using="" caries-active="" rats,="" grenby="" and="" phillips="" (ref.="" 77)="" evaluated:="" (1)="" the="" cariogenicity="" of="" lactitol,="" sucrose,="" and="" xylitol="" at="" a="" level="" of="" 160="" g="" per="" (/)="" kilogram="" (kg),="" a="" level="" stated="" to="" approximate="" the="" average="" sucrose="" content="" of="" the="" diet="" in="" developed="" countries,="" and="" (2)="" the="" cariogenicity="" of="" lactitol="" in="" a="" sweet="" biscuit="" compared="" to="" a="" sucrose-sweetened="" biscuit.="" in="" the="" first="" experiment,="" the="" sweetener="" was="" incorporated="" into="" a="" laboratory="" chow="" containing="" white="" flour,="" skim="" milk="" powder,="" liver="" powder,="" and="" a="" vitamin-="" mineral="" supplement.="" in="" the="" second="" part="" of="" the="" experiment,="" biscuits,="" containing="" 166="" g="" of="" lactitol/kg,="" were="" incorporated="" into="" the="" animal="" chow="" for="" a="" final="" concentration="" of="" lactitol="" of="" 110="" g/kg.="" animals="" were="" fed="" the="" diets="" for="" a="" period="" of="" 8="" wk.="" experiment="" 1="" showed="" highly="" significant="" differences="" in="" caries="" score,="" total="" number="" of="" lesions,="" and="" severity="" of="" lesions="" in="" the="" sugar="" alcohol="" groups="" compared="" to="" the="" sucrose="" controls.="" the="" sugar="" alcohol="" groups="" had="" very="" few="" caries,="" and="" differences="" between="" groups="" were="" not="" significant.="" the="" animals="" in="" both="" the="" xylitol="" and="" lactitol="" groups="" required="" several="" weeks="" to="" adapt="" to="" the="" diets,="" showing="" increased="" water="" intake="" and="" decreased="" food="" intake.="" because="" of="" poor="" physical="" condition,="" only="" 11="" of="" the="" 22="" rats="" in="" the="" xylitol="" group="" completed="" the="" full="" 8-wk="" test.="" animals="" on="" the="" sucrose="" diet="" were="" significantly="" heavier="" than="" the="" sugar="" alcohol="" animals.="" results="" of="" the="" second="" test="" showed="" highly="" significant="" differences="" between="" the="" lactitol-="" and="" sucrose-biscuits="" groups="" in="" all="" caries="" parameters.="" the="" average="" caries="" score="" for="" the="" lactitol="" group="" was="" less="" than="" one="" per="" animal.="" weight="" gains,="" however,="" were="" consistently="" lower,="" and="" water="" intake="" increased="" in="" the="" lactitol="" group.="" the="" results="" of="" the="" above="" animal="" studies="" show="" that="" animals="" fed="" sugar="" alcohols="" in="" animal="" chow="" had="" fewer="" and="" less="" extensive="" caries="" than="" animals="" fed="" sucrose.="" the="" studies="" also="" show="" that,="" in="" general,="" rats="" do="" not="" eat="" as="" much="" of="" a="" sugar="" alcohol-containing="" diet="" as="" a="" sucrose-="" containing="" diet="" and,="" therefore,="" tend="" to="" gain="" less="" weight="" and="" have="" more="" physiological="" problems.="" e.="" summary="" of="" human="" and="" animal="" studies="" 1.="" xylitol="" in="" its="" 1978="" review="" of="" the="" studies="" on="" xylitol,="" faseb="" concluded="" that="" xylitol="" appeared="" to="" be="" noncariogenic="" in="" studies="" evaluating="" the="" effect="" of="" sucrose="" [[page="" 37520]]="" replacement="" with="" xylitol="" and="" in="" studies="" evaluating="" the="" effect="" of="" partial="" replacement="" of="" sucrose="" with="" xylitol="" in="" chewing="" gum="" (ref.="" 14).="" however,="" faseb="" concluded="" that="" it="" was="" essential="" that="" these="" studies="" be="" replicated="" by="" other="" workers="" in="" order="" to="" confirm="" the="" observations="" and="" conclusions.="" rekola="" (refs.="" 23="" and="" 25)="" conducted="" a="" followup="" assessment="" of="" results="" from="" the="" 2-yr="" turku="" sugar="" study="" evaluating="" the="" progression="" of="" incipient="" carious="" lesions="" and="" lesion="" sizes="" on="" buccal="" smooth="" surfaces="" with="" dietary="" substitution="" of="" xylitol="" for="" sucrose.="" in="" the="" 2-yr="" turku="" sugar="" study,="" dietary="" xylitol="" was="" almost="" completely="" substituted="" for="" sucrose.="" subjects="" were="" assigned="" to="" groups="" based="" on="" individual="" preference.="" rekola="" examined="" color="" dental="" photographs,="" taken="" during="" the="" 2-yr="" study,="" of="" 33="" subjects="" in="" the="" sucrose="" group="" and="" 47="" subjects="" in="" the="" xylitol="" group.="" the="" xylitol="" group="" showed="" significantly="" smaller="" white="" spot="" lesions="" and="" had="" a="" significantly="" lower="" caries="" score="" compared="" to="" the="" sucrose="" group.="" results="" of="" several="" more="" recent="" human="" caries="" studies="" (refs.="" 22,="" 26,="" and="" 28="" through="" 30)="" reported="" significantly="" fewer="" caries="" in="" the="" xylitol="" group="" compared="" to="" the="" sucrose="" group.="" kandelman="" and="" gagnon="" (ref.="" 22)="" reported="" significantly="" less="" npd="" and="" incidence="" of="" dmft="" in="" school="" children="" chewing="" three="" sticks="" per="" day="" of="" xylitol="" gum="" (3.4="" g)="" or="" xylitol="" and="" sorbitol="" gum="" (0.9="" g="" xylitol="" and="" 2.4="" g="" sorbitol)="" compared="" to="" the="" nongum="" control="" group.="" results="" of="" xylitol="" field="" studies="" in="" hungary="" (refs.="" 26="" and="" 28),="" french="" polynesia="" (refs.="" 29="" and="" 30),="" and="" thailand="" (ref.="" 29)="" conducted="" by="" who="" showed="" lower="" caries="" incidence="" and="" caries="" increment="" rate="" in="" children="" consuming="" xylitol="" and="" sorbitol="" in="" chewing="" gum="" (ref.="" 29)="" and="" xylitol="" in="" other="" snack="" foods="" (ref.="" 30)="" compared="" to="" a="" nonsugar="" alcohol="" group.="" however,="" results="" of="" the="" gum="" study="" in="" french="" polynesia="" and="" thailand="" (ref.="" 29)="" were="" confounded="" by="" the="" presence="" of="" fluoride="" in="" the="" gums="" tested.="" in="" addition,="" the="" prevalence="" and="" incidence="" of="" dental="" caries="" in="" these="" population="" groups="" were="" high="" and="" increasing="" and="" do="" not="" reflect="" the="" general="" healthy="" population="" of="" the="" united="" states.="" the="" effect="" of="" xylitol="" on="" acid="" production="" or="" plaque="" ph="" was="" studied="" in="" ten="" studies="" (refs.="" 38,="" 39,="" 41,="" 43="" through="" 46,="" 48,="" 50,="" and="" 76).="" in="" nine="" of="" these="" (refs.="" 38,="" 39,="" 41,="" 43="" through="" 46,="" 48,="" and="" 50),="" xylitol="" was="" found="" to="" result="" in="" negligible="" to="" no="" acid="" production="" with="" little="" to="" no="" change="" in="" plaque="" ph.="" similarly,="" results="" showed="" no="" significant="" effect="" of="" xylitol="" on="" resting="" plaque="" ph.="" plaque="" ph="" from="" exposure="" to="" xylitol="" was="" always="" significantly="" higher="" than="" that="" of="" sucrose="" or="" glucose.="" twelve="" animal="" studies="" (refs.="" 52,="" 54,="" 56="" through="" 60,="" 62,="" 63,="" 68,="" 73,="" and="" 77)="" evaluated="" the="" effects="" of="" xylitol="" on="" dental="" caries="" in="" rats="" or="" hamsters.="" eight="" of="" these="" (refs.="" 52,="" 57="" through="" 60,="" 62,="" 63,="" and="" 77)="" used="" a="" test="" diet="" that="" contained="" only="" one="" sweetener,="" either="" sucrose="" or="" xylitol.="" in="" all="" of="" these="" studies,="" there="" were="" significantly="" fewer="" caries="" reported="" in="" animals="" consuming="" the="" basal="" diet="" with="" xylitol="" compared="" to="" sucrose="" controls.="" the="" incidence="" of="" caries="" was="" also="" significantly="" less="" in="" the="" xylitol="" group="" compared="" to="" animals="" consuming="" isomalt="" (ref.="" 63)="" and="" sorbitol="" (ref.="" 52).="" the="" concentrations="" of="" xylitol="" in="" the="" test="" diets="" ranged="" from="" 10="" percent="" up="" to="" 30="" percent="" by="" weight.="" results="" of="" the="" animal="" studies="" evaluating="" the="" effect="" of="" xylitol="" in="" diets="" containing="" sucrose="" (refs.="" 54,="" 56,="" 68,="" and="" 73)="" showed="" mixed="" results="" depending="" on="" the="" concentrations="" of="" sucrose="" and="" xylitol="" in="" the="" test="" diets.="" havenaar="" et="" al.="" (ref="" 54)="" showed="" no="" significant="" difference="" in="" caries="" in="" animals="" consuming="" a="" diet="" with="" sucrose="" and="" 5-percent="" xylitol,="" but="" a="" significant="" difference="" in="" caries="" when="" the="" sucrose="" was="" lowered="" to="" 20-percent="" of="" the="" diet="" and="" xylitol="" 5-percent.="" grenby="" and="" colley="" (ref.="" 56)="" reported="" a="" high="" caries="" level="" in="" animals="" consuming="" either="" a="" diet="" containing="" 46-percent="" sucrose="" or="" 36-percent="" sucrose="" and="" 10-percent="" xylitol.="" the="" caries="" score="" was="" significantly="" lower="" in="" rats="" consuming="" a="" diet="" with="" 26-percent="" sucrose="" and="" 20-percent="" xylitol="" compared="" to="" the="" 46-percent="" sucrose="" diet.="" an="" in="" vitro="" microbiological="" test="" showed="" no="" acid="" production="" by="" s.="" mutans="" from="" xylitol.="" van="" der="" hoeven="" (ref.="" 73)="" reported="" significantly="" fewer="" caries="" in="" rats="" consuming="" a="" diet="" with="" 25-percent="" xylitol="" compared="" to="" the="" rats="" consuming="" a="" basic="" diet="" with="" 25-percent="" sucrose.="" the="" xylitol="" group="" also="" had="" fewer="" caries="" than="" the="" wheat="" flour="" control="" group.="" 2.="" sorbitol="" in="" its="" march="" 1979,="" review="" of="" sorbitol="" in="" health="" and="" disease="" (ref.="" 15),="" faseb="" reviewed="" available="" animal="" and="" human="" studies="" regarding="" the="" cariogenicity="" of="" sorbitol.="" faseb="" concluded="" that="" the="" weight="" of="" evidence="" from="" animal="" studies="" suggests="" that="" sorbitol="" is="" less="" cariogenic="" than="" sucrose,="" fructose,="" glucose,="" and="" dextrin.="" based="" on="" the="" human="" studies="" published="" in="" the="" early="" to="" mid-1970's,="" faseb="" noted="" that="" the="" results="" do="" not="" provide="" definitive="" data="" on="" the="" effect="" of="" sorbitol="" on="" the="" caries="" process.="" it="" noted="" that="" the="" results="" of="" studies="" on="" plaque="" ph="" suggest="" that="" sorbitol="" is="" slowly="" fermented="" to="" plaque="" ph="" levels="" of="" about="" 6.="" it="" also="" said="" that="" some="" studies="" have="" provided="" evidence="" of="" adaptation="" of="" oral="" flora="" after="" long-term="" use="" of="" sorbitol-containing="" products.="" faseb="" noted="" that="" a="" human="" population="" that="" regularly="" consumes="" sorbitol-containing="" foods,="" such="" as="" jams="" and="" jellies,="" baked="" goods,="" or="" other="" food="" products,="" has="" not="" been="" identified="" and="" studied="" to="" establish="" whether="" sorbitol="" significantly="" alters="" the="" carious="" process.="" two="" studies="" submitted="" with="" the="" petition="" evaluated="" the="" cariogenicity="" of="" sorbitol="" in="" chewing="" gum="" (refs.="" 20="" and="" 32),="" and="" one="" study="" (ref.="" 35)="" evaluated="" the="" effect="" of="" sorbitol="" in="" chewing="" gum="" on="" demineralization="" of="" enamel.="" moller="" and="" poulsen="" (ref.="" 20)="" reported="" an="" increased="" number="" of="" sound="" tooth="" surfaces="" and="" a="" smaller="" caries="" increment="" rate="" in="" children="" consuming="" sorbitol="" gum="" containing="" calcium="" phosphate="" compared="" to="" the="" control="" group="" that="" did="" not="" consume="" chewing="" gum.="" however,="" the="" presence="" of="" calcium="" phosphate,="" which="" acts="" as="" a="" buffer="" in="" saliva="" to="" help="" reduce="" its="" acidity,="" and="" the="" absence="" of="" gum="" chewing="" in="" the="" control="" group,="" confound="" these="" observations.="" glass="" (ref.="" 32)="" reported="" no="" significant="" differences="" in="" the="" number="" of="" df="" surfaces="" or="" teeth="" in="" children="" using="" sorbitol="" chewing="" gum="" for="" 2="" yr="" compared="" to="" a="" no-gum="" group.="" this="" study,="" however,="" did="" not="" consider="" the="" effect="" of="" chewing="" gum="" per="" se="" on="" dental="" caries.="" leach="" et="" al.="" (ref.="" 35)="" conducted="" an="" intraoral="" test="" in="" subjects="" fitted="" with="" bands="" containing="" human="" enamel="" with="" artificial="" white="" spot="" lesions.="" the="" subjects="" consumed="" sucrose-containing="" snacks.="" during="" one="" of="" the="" test="" periods,="" the="" subjects="" chewed="" gum="" containing="" sorbitol="" with="" small="" amounts="" of="" mannitol,="" hgs,="" and="" aspartame,="" for="" 20="" min="" at="" a="" time="" after="" each="" meal="" and="" snack.="" the="" study="" showed="" significantly="" more="" remineralization="" during="" the="" sorbitol="" gum="" period="" compared="" to="" baseline="" and="" the="" no-gum="" (sucrose)="" period.="" results="" of="" this="" study="" are="" confounded,="" however,="" because="" of="" the="" duration="" (i.e.,="" 20="" min)="" and="" timing="" (i.e.,="" immediately="" after="" meals="" and="" snacks)="" of="" the="" gum="" chewing.="" in="" addition,="" the="" effect="" of="" sorbitol="" alone="" cannot="" be="" determined="" because="" of="" the="" presence="" of="" other="" sugar="" alcohols="" and="" aspartame="" in="" the="" test="" gum.="" banoczy="" et="" al.="" (ref.="" 21)="" reported="" a="" significantly="" lower="" caries="" increment="" in="" children="" consuming="" sorbitol-containing="" sweets="" between="" meals="" compared="" to="" children="" consuming="" sucrose-containing="" sweets="" between="" meals="" over="" a="" 2-yr="" period.="" differences="" between="" groups="" were="" not="" significant="" during="" the="" third="" yr="" of="" this="" study,="" however,="" the="" authors="" attributed="" the="" lack="" of="" significance="" during="" the="" third="" yr="" to="" the="" trading="" of="" sweets="" between="" groups.="" [[page="" 37521]]="" twelve="" studies="" evaluated="" changes="" in="" plaque="" ph="" after="" exposure="" to="" sorbitol-sweetened="" mouth="" rinses="" (refs.="" 39="" through="" 41,="" 45,="" and="" 47),="" solutions="" (refs.="" 38,="" 46,="" and="" 76),="" tablets="" (ref.="" 42),="" mints="" (ref.="" 49),="" chewing="" gum="" (ref.="" 50),="" and="" licorice="" (ref.="" 43).="" plaque="" ph="" changes="" in="" the="" presence="" of="" sorbitol="" decreased="" from="" baseline="" ph="" but="" remained="" approximately="" at="" or="" above="" a="" ph="" of="" 6.0="" (refs.="" 39="" through="" 42,="" 45="" through="" 47,="" and="" 50).="" bibby="" and="" fu="" (ref.="" 38)="" reported="" progressively="" decreasing="" plaque="" ph="" values="" in="" vitro="" with="" increasing="" concentrations="" of="" sorbitol="" in="" a="" concentrated="" plaque="" suspension.="" only="" slight="" decreases="" in="" ph="" were="" reported="" in="" 0.1-="" to="" 1.0-percent="" solutions.="" in="" the="" presence="" of="" a="" 10-="" percent="" sorbitol="" solution,="" plaque="" ph="" dropped="" to="" about="" 5.8.="" grenby="" et="" al.="" (ref.="" 76)="" reported="" a="" ph="" of="" about="" 6.0="" after="" 12="" h="" and="" a="" final="" ph="" in="" vitro="" of="" about="" 4.6="" after="" 24="" h="" of="" incubating="" concentrated="" plaque="" with="" 10-percent="" sorbitol.="" the="" results="" of="" these="" studies="" suggest="" that="" higher="" concentrations="" of="" sorbitol="" may="" lead="" to="" further="" decreases="" in="" plaque="" ph="" to="" a="" level="" that="" may="" become="" detrimental="" to="" tooth="" enamel="" (i.e.,="" at="" or="" below="" ph="" 5.5).="" park="" et="" al.="" (ref.="" 49)="" found="" that="" use="" of="" sorbitol="" mints="" or="" mints="" with="" a="" blend="" of="" sorbitol="" and="" xylitol="" helped="" reduce="" the="" acidogenic="" potential="" of="" certain="" snack="" foods,="" although="" final="" ph="" values="" remained="" low.="" toors="" and="" herczog="" (ref.="" 43)="" showed="" that="" plaque="" ph="" is="" affected="" by="" more="" than="" the="" sweetener="" component="" of="" a="" food.="" results="" of="" plaque="" ph="" in="" vivo="" with="" an="" experimental="" licorice,="" containing="" sorbitol,="" soy="" flour,="" and="" potato="" starch="" derivative="" among="" other="" ingredients,="" showed="" a="" minimum="" ph="" of="" about="" 5.5.="" a="" sucrose-containing="" licorice="" used="" in="" this="" study="" lowered="" plaque="" ph="" to="" about="" 5.0.="" the="" fermentability="" of="" both="" the="" potato="" starch="" derivative="" (82="" percent)="" and="" soy="" flour="" (75="" percent)="" contributed="" to="" the="" observed="" changes="" in="" plaque="" ph="" in="" the="" experimental="" licorice.="" the="" fermentability="" of="" sorbitol="" in="" the="" experimental="" licorice="" was="" 12="" percent.="" five="" studies="" (refs.="" 39="" through="" 41,="" 43,="" and="" 48)="" measured="" the="" apa="" of="" plaque="" with="" sorbitol.="" in="" all="" cases,="" sorbitol="" was="" fermented="" slowly="" with="" a="" reported="" range="" of="" acid="" production="" of="" 10="" to="" 30="" percent="" compared="" to="" sucrose="" or="" glucose.="" the="" higher="" acid="" production="" rate="" (i.e.,="" 30="" percent)="" was="" attributed="" to="" adaptation="" to="" sorbitol="" by="" s.="" mutans="" and="" other="" plaque="" microorganisms="" capable="" of="" fermenting="" carbohydrates.="" havenaar="" et="" al.="" (ref.="" 46)="" also="" reported="" a="" marked="" increase="" in="" fermentation="" of="" sorbitol="" and="" other="" sugar="" alcohols="" after="" multiple="" subculturing="" of="" plaque="" microorganisms="" with="" the="" sugar="" alcohol.="" however,="" the="" investigators="" reported="" that="" adaptation="" to="" sorbitol="" and="" other="" sugar="" alcohols="" was="" lost="" after="" subculturing="" once="" in="" glucose.="" results="" of="" animal="" studies="" evaluating="" sorbitol="" (refs.="" 35,="" 52,="" 58,="" 59,="" 62,="" 64,="" and="" 73)="" showed="" significantly="" fewer="" caries="" in="" the="" sorbitol="" group="" than="" in="" the="" sucrose="" group.="" however,="" use="" of="" sorbitol="" resulted="" in="" more="" caries="" compared="" to="" animals="" consuming="" other="" sugar="" alcohols,="" such="" as="" xylitol="" and="" hsh="" (refs.="" 52,="" 64,="" and="" 73).="" the="" concentration="" of="" sorbitol="" in="" these="" studies="" ranged="" from="" 10="" percent="" up="" to="" 56="" percent.="" 3.="" mannitol="" in="" its="" august="" 1979,="" review="" of="" mannitol="" in="" health="" and="" disease,="" faseb="" (ref.="" 16)="" reviewed="" available="" animal="" and="" human="" studies="" regarding="" the="" effect="" of="" mannitol="" on="" acid="" production,="" plaque="" ph="" changes,="" and="" changes="" in="" microhardness="" of="" bovine="" enamel="" in="" an="" ict.="" it="" noted="" that="" human="" plaque="" studies="" in="" vivo="" or="" in="" vitro="" found="" that="" plaque="" ph="" decreases="" from="" 0="" up="" to="" 1.0="" units="" over="" a="" 30-min="" test="" period.="" faseb="" concluded="" that="" the="" results="" were="" consistent="" with="" the="" results="" of="" animal="" experiments="" showing="" that="" mannitol,="" in="" the="" absence="" of="" adaptation="" of="" the="" oral="" microflora,="" is="" less="" cariogenic="" than="" sucrose.="" bibby="" and="" fu="" (ref.="" 38)="" measured="" in="" vitro="" plaque="" ph="" changes,="" over="" a="" 20-min="" incubation="" period,="" in="" the="" presence="" of="" increasing="" concentrations="" of="" mannitol="" (0.1-,="" 1.0-,="" and="" 10-percent="" concentrations)="" in="" a="" concentrated="" plaque="" suspension.="" results="" showed="" that="" plaque="" ph="" decreased="" with="" increasing="" concentrations="" of="" mannitol.="" final="" plaque="" ph="" values="" were="" 5.67,="" 5.54,="" and="" 5.22,="" respectively.="" similar="" plaque="" ph="" values="" were="" reported="" by="" grenby="" et.="" al.="" (ref.="" 76).="" results="" of="" the="" grenby="" study="" showed="" that="" a="" 1-percent="" solution="" of="" mannitol,="" when="" incubated="" for="" 24="" h="" with="" concentrated="" plaque="" and="" pieces="" of="" a="" human="" molar="" tooth,="" resulted="" in="" slight="" acid="" production="" and="" ph="" decrease="" over="" a="" 12-h="" period,="" but="" that="" after="" 24="" h,="" the="" final="" ph="" was="" about="" 5.1.="" however,="" results="" from="" an="" in="" vitro="" demineralization="" test="" showed="" very="" little="" loss="" of="" calcium="" and="" phosphorus,="" significantly="" less="" than="" the="" loss="" of="" minerals="" with="" glucose.="" results="" of="" other="" studies,="" however,="" show="" that="" mannitol="" results="" in="" little="" change="" to="" plaque="" ph.="" birkhed="" and="" edwardsson="" (ref.="" 39)="" reported="" only="" slight="" changes="" in="" plaque="" ph="" following="" use="" of="" a="" mouth="" rinse="" with="" a="" concentrated="" solution="" of="" mannitol.="" in="" addition,="" they="" reported="" an="" acid="" production="" rate="" from="" mannitol="" in="" dental="" plaque="" suspension="" of="" 0="" percent="" compared="" to="" sucrose="" (100="" percent).="" gehring="" and="" hufnagel="" (ref.="" 45)="" used="" intraoral="" measurements="" to="" evaluate="" the="" effect="" of="" sugar="" alcohols="" on="" plaque="" ph.="" results="" of="" plaque="" exposed="" to="" a="" 20-percent="" mannitol="" solution="" showed="" the="" minimum="" ph="" obtained="" was="" slightly="" above="" 6.0.="" the="" plaque="" samples="" in="" these="" two="" studies="" were="" not="" concentrated="" as="" they="" were="" in="" the="" study="" by="" bibby="" and="" fu="" (ref.="" 38)="" or="" by="" grenby="" et="" al.="" (ref.="" 76),="" which="" may="" account="" for="" the="" differences="" in="" plaque="" ph="" values="" reported="" for="" mannitol="" solutions.="" the="" results="" of="" one="" other="" in="" vitro="" microbiological="" study,="" with="" 10-percent="" mannitol="" and="" an="" incubation="" time="" of="" 48="" h="" (ref.="" 62),="" support="" the="" observation="" that="" mannitol="" is="" fermented="" very="" slowly,="" resulting="" in="" little="" acid="" production="" and="" small="" ph="" changes.="" animals="" fed="" mannitol="" (refs.="" 59="" and="" 64)="" or="" maltitol="" (refs.="" 66,="" 67,="" and="" 69)="" showed="" significantly="" fewer="" caries="" compared="" to="" animals="" fed="" sucrose="" diets.="" the="" concentrations="" of="" the="" sugar="" alcohols="" in="" these="" studies="" ranged="" from="" 10="" to="" 56="" percent.="" an="" in="" vitro="" microbiological="" study="" (ref.="" 62)="" showed="" that="" a="" 10-percent="" solution="" of="" mannitol="" was="" fermented="" very="" slowly.="" 4.="" maltitol="" three="" studies="" (refs.="" 33,="" 34,="" and="" 36)="" measured="" the="" effects="" on="" enamel="" decalcification="" of="" maltitol="" and="" sucrose="" solutions="" using="" an="" ict="" with="" bovine="" enamel="" fragments="" adhered="" to="" a="" partial="" denture.="" ikeda="" and="" coworkers="" (ref.="" 33)="" showed="" significantly="" more="" decalcification="" in="" the="" presence="" of="" sucrose="" as="" compared="" to="" maltitol.="" additional="" rat="" caries="" tests="" were="" in="" agreement="" with="" the="" results="" of="" the="" ict.="" rats="" fed="" a="" diet="" with="" maltitol="" had="" significantly="" fewer="" caries="" than="" the="" sucrose="" group.="" in="" this="" study="" maltitol="" was="" almost="" noncariogenic.="" yagi="" (ref.="" 34)="" reported="" significantly="" harder="" enamel="" after="" exposure="" to="" maltitol="" than="" after="" exposure="" to="" sucrose.="" lack="" of="" details="" in="" this="" study,="" however,="" make="" it="" difficult="" to="" completely="" interpret="" the="" results.="" rundegren="" (ref.="" 36)="" reported="" significantly="" less="" enamel="" demineralization="" with="" maltitol="" compared="" to="" sucrose.="" the="" authors="" associated="" the="" changes="" that="" they="" observed="" in="" enamel="" hardness="" in="" the="" maltitol="" group="" with="" the="" effects="" of="" other="" dietary="" carbohydrates="" and="" not="" maltitol.="" sucrose="" was="" found="" to="" exert="" an="" effect="" on="" enamel="" hardness="" that="" is="" not="" related="" to="" the="" effects="" of="" other="" dietary="" carbohydrates.="" three="" studies="" (refs.="" 39,="" 41,="" and="" 46)="" evaluated="" plaque="" ph="" or="" acid="" production="" in="" maltitol.="" birkhed="" and="" edwardsson="" (ref.="" 39)="" measured="" in="" vitro="" acid="" production="" and="" ph="" changes="" in="" human="" dental="" plaque="" following="" the="" use="" of="" various="" sweeteners="" in="" a="" mouth="" rinse.="" the="" results="" with="" maltitol="" showed="" an="" acid="" production="" rate="" of="" 10="" to="" 30="" percent="" [[page="" 37522]]="" of="" that="" of="" sucrose.="" changes="" in="" plaque="" ph="" in="" the="" presence="" of="" maltitol="" showed="" only="" a="" slight="" decrease="" from="" baseline="" ph="" (about="" ph="" 6.9).="" birkhed="" et="" al.="" (ref.="" 41)="" measured="" in="" vivo="" ph="" changes="" in="" human="" dental="" plaque="" after="" subjects="" consumed="" lozenges="" sweetened="" with="" various="" sweeteners="" for="" 3="" mo="" and="" then="" rinsed="" with="" a="" mouth="" rinse="" sweetened="" with="" the="" same="" sweetener="" as="" in="" the="" lozenge.="" a="" sucrose="" mouth="" rinse="" was="" also="" used="" by="" each="" sweetener="" group.="" results="" with="" maltitol="" showed="" small,="" but="" some="" significant,="" changes="" in="" plaque="" ph="" compared="" to="" baseline="" ph="" (about="" ph="" 7.0)="" over="" the="" 30-min="" test="" period.="" the="" lowest="" plaque="" ph="" recorded,="" however,="" was="" about="" ph="" 6.8.="" in="" vitro="" acid="" production="" with="" maltitol="" was="" found="" to="" be="" about="" 26="" to="" 32="" percent="" of="" glucose.="" havenaar="" et="" al.="" (ref.="" 46)="" measured="" changes="" in="" ph="" and="" acid="" production="" in="" vitro="" in="" growing="" cultures="" of="" oral="" bacteria="" obtained="" from="" caries="" active="" and="" caries="" free="" subjects.="" results="" showed="" that="" a="" 1="" percent="" solution="" of="" maltitol="" was="" slowly="" fermented="" to="" acid="" by="" plaque="" bacteria.="" cell="" suspensions="" of="" s.="" mutans="" in="" maltitol="" showed="" ph="" decreased="" from="" a="" baseline="" of="" about="" ph="" 7.0="" to="" about="" ph="" 6.5.="" adaptation="" of="" s.="" mutans="" by="" frequent="" subculturing="" in="" maltitol="" showed="" a="" marked="" increase="" in="" fermentation="" by="" s.="" mutans.="" however,="" the="" ability="" to="" ferment="" the="" sugar="" alcohol="" was="" lost="" after="" one="" subculturing="" of="" the="" adapted="" strain="" in="" glucose.="" 5.="" lactitol="" havenaar="" et="" al.="" (ref.="" 46)="" showed="" that="" a="" 1="" percent="" solution="" of="" lactitol="" was="" fermented="" by="" s.="" mutans="" and="" actinomyces.="" cell="" suspensions="" of="" s.="" mutans="" in="" lactitol="" showed="" ph="" decreased="" from="" a="" baseline="" of="" about="" ph="" 7.0="" to="" about="" ph="" 6.5="" or="" above="" after="" a="" 2-h="" incubation="" period.="" adaptation="" of="" s.="" mutans="" by="" frequent="" subculturing="" in="" lactitol="" showed="" a="" marked="" increase="" in="" fermentation="" by="" s.="" mutans="" to="" give="" a="" plaque="" ph="" of="" about="" 5.0.="" however,="" the="" ability="" to="" ferment="" the="" sugar="" alcohol="" was="" lost="" after="" one="" subculturing="" of="" the="" adapted="" strain="" in="" glucose.="" grenby="" et="" al.="" (ref.="" 76)="" showed="" that="" a="" 1-percent="" solution="" of="" lactitol,="" when="" incubated="" for="" 24="" h="" with="" human="" plaque="" and="" pieces="" of="" a="" human="" molar="" tooth,="" resulted="" in="" slight="" acid="" production="" and="" a="" final="" ph="" of="" about="" 6.3="" and="" almost="" no="" loss="" of="" calcium="" and="" phosphorus="" from="" tooth="" enamel.="" results="" of="" two="" animal="" studies="" (refs.="" 73="" and="" 77)="" showed="" that="" substitution="" of="" lactitol="" for="" sucrose="" in="" laboratory="" chow="" resulted="" in="" significantly="" fewer="" caries="" in="" the="" lactitol="" group="" compared="" to="" the="" sucrose="" group.="" the="" lactitol="" group="" (ref.="" 73)="" experienced="" slightly,="" but="" not="" significantly,="" more="" caries="" than="" the="" xylitol="" group="" and="" the="" wheat="" flour="" control="" group="" and="" fewer="" caries="" than="" the="" sorbitol="" group.="" there="" was="" no="" significant="" difference="" between="" the="" caries="" score="" in="" animals="" fed="" lactitol-containing="" or="" xylitol-containing="" chow="" (ref.="" 77).="" there="" were="" significantly="" fewer="" caries="" in="" animals="" fed="" lactitol-containing="" biscuits="" compared="" to="" the="" sucrose="" biscuit="" group="" (ref.="" 77).="" the="" average="" caries="" score="" in="" the="" lactitol="" biscuit="" group="" was="" less="" than="" one="" per="" animal.="" 6.="" isomalt="" two="" studies="" investigated="" the="" effects="" on="" plaque="" ph="" with="" isomalt="" (refs.="" 38="" and="" 45).="" bibby="" and="" fu="" (ref.="" 38)="" measured="" ph="" changes="" in="" fresh="" plaque="" from="" adult="" volunteers="" with="" increasing="" concentrations="" of="" isomalt.="" results="" showed="" that="" as="" the="" concentration="" of="" the="" sugar="" alcohol="" increased,="" the="" ph="" of="" the="" plaque="" decreased.="" the="" range="" of="" plaque="" ph="" values="" reported="" for="" isomalt="" was="" from="" 6.6="" (0.1="" percent="" solution)="" to="" approximately="" 5.7="" (10-percent="" solution).="" gehring="" and="" hufnagel="" (ref.="" 45)="" reported="" a="" minimum="" plaque="" ph="" of="" about="" 6.0="" after="" 5="" min="" with="" isomalt.="" this="" value="" increased="" gradually="" over="" the="" next="" 27="" min="" to="" about="" ph="" 6.3.="" as="" discussed="" above,="" the="" methods="" and="" type="" of="" dental="" plaque="" must="" be="" considered="" when="" comparing="" the="" results="" of="" these="" studies.="" results="" of="" animal="" studies="" with="" concentrations="" of="" isomalt="" from="" 16="" to="" 30="" percent="" of="" the="" rat="" diet="" showed="" significantly="" fewer="" caries="" compared="" to="" sucrose="" diets="" (refs.="" 57,="" 60,="" 62,="" 63,="" 65,="" and="" 70).="" the="" caries="" incidence="" was="" high="" in="" xerostomized="" rats="" consuming="" either="" sucrose="" or="" isomalt="" (ref.="" 57).="" the="" isomalt="" group="" of="" nonxerostomized="" rats,="" however,="" had="" significantly="" fewer="" caries="" than="" the="" sucrose="" group.="" 7.="" hgs="" and="" hsh="" frostell="" et="" al.="" (ref.="" 31)="" studied="" the="" effect="" on="" caries="" increment="" in="" children="" of="" substitution="" of="" hsh="" for="" sucrose="" in="" candy.="" the="" results="" of="" this="" study="" are="" confounded="" for="" a="" number="" of="" reasons="" (see="" table="" 2)="" and="" do="" not="" support="" a="" significant="" dental="" benefit="" from="" the="" use="" of="" hsh="" candies="" in="" place="" of="" sucrose-containing="" candies.="" rundegren="" et="" al.="" (ref.="" 36)="" measured="" enamel="" hardness="" in="" the="" presence="" of="" sucrose,="" sodium="" chloride,="" or="" hsh="" using="" an="" ict.="" the="" investigators="" reported="" significantly="" less="" enamel="" demineralization="" with="" hsh.="" the="" results="" of="" the="" study="" were="" that="" only="" sucrose="" promoted="" demineralization="" over="" and="" above="" the="" effect="" of="" dietary="" carbohydrates.="" the="" authors="" attributed="" the="" demineralization="" measured="" in="" the="" presence="" of="" hsh="" to="" the="" effect="" of="" dietary="" carbohydrates.="" eight="" studies="" measured="" plaque="" ph="" changes="" from="" exposure="" to="" hsh="" in="" solutions="" (refs.="" 38="" and="" 46),="" rinses="" (refs.="" 39,="" 41,="" 45,="" and="" 47),="" and="" candy="" (refs.="" 42="" and="" 43).="" bibby="" and="" fu="" (ref.="" 38)="" showed="" that="" as="" the="" concentration="" of="" hsh="" increased,="" plaque="" ph="" decreased.="" the="" lowest="" plaque="" ph="" value="" (10-percent="" solution="" of="" hsh)="" obtained="" was="" about="" 5.0.="" havenaar="" et="" al.="" (ref.="" 46)="" showed="" that="" a="" 1-percent="" solution="" of="" hsh="" was="" fermented="" by="" s.="" mutans="" and="" actinomyces.="" cell="" suspensions="" of="" s.="" mutans="" in="" hsh="" showed="" a="" ph="" decrease="" from="" a="" baseline="" of="" about="" ph="" 7.0="" to="" about="" ph="" 6.5.="" adaptation="" of="" s.="" mutans="" by="" frequent="" subculturing="" in="" hsh="" showed="" a="" marked="" increase="" in="" fermentation="" by="" s.="" mutans="" to="" give="" a="" plaque="" ph="" of="" slightly="" below="" 6.0.="" however,="" the="" ability="" to="" ferment="" the="" sugar="" alcohol="" was="" lost="" after="" one="" subculturing="" of="" the="" adapted="" strain="" in="" glucose.="" birkhed="" and="" edwardsson="" (ref.="" 39)="" measured="" plaque="" ph="" in="" vitro="" following="" the="" use="" of="" a="" mouth="" rinse="" containing="" swedish="" or="" french="" hsh.="" french="" hsh="" appeared="" to="" have="" little="" effect="" on="" plaque="" ph.="" plaque="" ph="" values="" remained="" slightly="" below="" or="" at="" 7.0.="" swedish="" hsh="" showed="" a="" decrease="" in="" plaque="" ph="" within="" 5="" to="" 10="" min="" to="" just="" less="" than="" ph="" 6.0.="" over="" the="" remaining="" 20="" min,="" the="" ph="" increased="" to="" just="" over="" 6.0.="" birkhed="" et="" al.="" (ref.="" 41)="" measured="" ph="" changes="" in="" human="" dental="" plaque="" after="" subjects="" consumed="" lozenges="" sweetened="" with="" swedish="" hsh="" for="" 3="" mo="" and="" then="" rinsed="" with="" a="" mouth="" rinse="" sweetened="" with="" swedish="" hsh.="" plaque="" ph="" was="" also="" measured="" after="" a="" sucrose="" mouth="" rinse.="" the="" results="" of="" the="" study="" showed="" that="" hsh="" resulted="" in="" a="" drop="" in="" plaque="" ph="" in="" all="" tests;="" however,="" the="" minimum="" ph="" values="" reached="" were="" above="" 6.0.="" gehring="" and="" hufnagel="" (ref.="" 45)="" reported="" an="" intraoral="" plaque="" ph="" change="" with="" a="" hsh="" rinse="" (20="" percent="" solution)="" from="" about="" ph="" 6.6="" to="" about="" 5.6.="" jensen="" (ref.="" 47)="" showed="" interproximal="" plaque="" ph="" values="" from="" five="" different="" hgs="" rinses="" were="" statistically="" significantly="" different="" compared="" to="" the="" sucrose="" control.="" differences="" between="" the="" hgs="" test="" solutions="" and="" a="" sorbitol="" control="" were="" not="" significantly="" different.="" the="" minimum="" ph="" values="" obtained="" with="" the="" hgs="" solutions="" were="" above="" ph="" 6.0.="" composition="" of="" the="" hgs="" test="" substances="" was="" not="" provided.="" frostell="" (ref.="" 42)="" reported="" a="" slight="" decrease="" in="" vitro="" plaque="" ph="" (from="" about="" 6.7="" to="" about="" 6.5)="" after="" subjects="" consumed="" hsh="" candy.="" after="" consuming="" a="" sucrose="" lozenge,="" plaque="" ph="" decreased="" to="" about="" 5.8.="" a="" sucrose="" solution="" resulted="" in="" a="" minimum="" plaque="" ph="" of="" about="" 5.3.="" toors="" and="" herczog="" (ref.="" 43)="" showed="" that="" plaque="" ph="" is="" affected="" by="" more="" than="" the="" sweetener="" component="" of="" a="" food.="" results="" [[page="" 37523]]="" of="" plaque="" ph="" in="" vivo="" with="" an="" experimental="" licorice,="" containing="" soy="" flour,="" hps,="" and="" potato="" starch="" derivative="" among="" other="" ingredients,="" showed="" a="" minimum="" ph="" of="" about="" 5.5.="" the="" fermentability="" of="" the="" hps="" (60="" percent),="" potato="" starch="" derivative="" (82="" percent)="" and="" soy="" flour="" (75="" percent)="" contributed="" to="" the="" observed="" changes="" in="" plaque="" ph="" in="" the="" experimental="" licorice.="" acid="" production="" in="" vitro="" was="" reported="" in="" two="" studies="" (refs.="" 39="" and="" 51).="" birkhed="" and="" edwardsson="" (ref.="" 39)="" reported="" an="" acid="" production="" rate="" from="" french="" hsh="" of="" 20="" to="" 40="" percent="" and="" from="" swedish="" hsh="" of="" 50="" to="" 70="" percent="" compared="" to="" glucose="" syrups.="" birkhed="" and="" skude="" (ref.="" 51)="" reported="" significantly="" lower="" acid="" production="" rates="" (i.e.,="" slower="" rate="" of="" fermentation)="" from="" a="" 3="" percent="" solution="" of="" swedish="" hsh="" (61.5="" percent)="" compared="" to="" glucose="" (99.7="" percent).="" the="" investigators="" also="" reported="" that="" hsh="" was="" metabolized="" significantly="" more="" slowly="" than="" soluble="" starch.="" results="" of="" animal="" studies="" evaluating="" the="" effect="" of="" hsh="" showed="" the="" sweetener="" to="" be="" relatively="" noncariogenic="" compared="" to="" sucrose="" (refs.="" 52,="" 53,="" 64,="" and="" 69).="" differences="" in="" the="" incidence="" of="" caries="" between="" the="" sucrose="" and="" hsh="" groups="" were="" significant.="" iv.="" decision="" to="" propose="" a="" health="" claim="" relating="" sugar="" alcohols="" to="" the="" nonpromotion="" of="" dental="" caries="" fda="" limited="" its="" review="" of="" the="" scientific="" evidence="" relating="" sugar="" alcohols="" and="" dental="" caries="" to="" those="" studies="" evaluating="" changes="" in="" plaque="" ph,="" plaque="" acid="" production,="" decalcification="" or="" remineralization="" of="" tooth="" enamel,="" and="" the="" incidence="" of="" dental="" caries="" with="" sugar="" alcohols.="" fda="" considered="" these="" limitations="" to="" be="" appropriate="" because="" previous="" federal="" government="" and="" other="" authoritative="" reviews="" had="" focused="" on="" these="" areas="" (refs.="" 14="" through="" 16),="" and="" the="" majority="" of="" research="" efforts="" to="" date="" have="" focused="" on="" these="" areas.="" fda="" tentatively="" concludes="" that,="" based="" on="" the="" totality="" of="" publicly="" available="" scientific="" evidence="" regarding="" the="" relationship="" among="" sugar="" alcohols,="" plaque="" ph,="" and="" dental="" caries,="" there="" is="" significant="" scientific="" agreement="" to="" support="" the="" relationship="" between="" the="" use="" of="" xylitol,="" sorbitol,="" mannitol,="" maltitol,="" isomalt,="" lactitol,="" hsh,="" hgs,="" or="" a="" combination="" of="" these="" sugar="" alcohols="" and="" the="" nonpromotion="" of="" dental="" caries.="" thus,="" it="" appears="" that="" use="" of="" a="" health="" claim="" relating="" the="" use="" of="" sugar-alcohol="" containing="" products="" to="" dental="" caries="" will="" be="" useful="" in="" helping="" consumers="" identify="" food="" products="" consumption="" of="" which="" will="" not="" promote="" the="" development="" of="" dental="" caries.="" a.="" xylitol="" in="" its="" 1978="" review="" of="" the="" xylitol="" studies,="" faseb="" concluded="" that="" xylitol="" appeared="" to="" be="" noncariogenic="" in="" studies="" evaluating="" the="" effect="" of="" sucrose="" replacement="" with="" xylitol="" and="" in="" studies="" evaluating="" the="" effect="" of="" partial="" replacement="" of="" sucrose="" with="" xylitol="" in="" chewing="" gum="" (ref.="" 14).="" the="" agency="" reviewed="" over="" 15="" studies="" published="" since="" the="" faseb="" report="" that="" evaluated="" the="" relationship="" between="" xylitol="" and="" dental="" caries,="" plaque="" ph,="" and="" acid="" production.="" overall="" results="" from="" the="" human="" caries="" field="" trials="" (refs.="" 26="" and="" 28)="" suggest="" that="" substitution="" of="" xylitol-containing="" foods="" and="" chewing="" gums="" for="" sucrose-containing="" foods="" and="" chewing="" gums="" is="" associated="" with="" a="" lower="" incidence="" of="" dental="" caries.="" plaque="" ph="" and="" acid="" production="" studies="" further="" support="" this="" result.="" in="" both="" in="" vivo="" and="" in="" vitro="" studies,="" xylitol="" had="" negligible="" to="" no="" effect="" on="" plaque="" ph="" or="" plaque="" acid="" production.="" in="" some="" instances,="" xylitol="" increased="" plaque="" ph="" above="" the="" mean="" baseline="" value,="" suggesting="" that="" xylitol="" may="" truly="" be="" nonpromotional="" of="" dental="" caries.="" the="" results="" of="" over="" 10="" animal="" studies="" confirm="" the="" observations="" from="" clinical="" and="" in="" vitro="" studies.="" substituting="" xylitol="" (from="" 10="" to="" 30="" percent)="" for="" sucrose="" in="" a="" basic="" laboratory="" chow="" resulted="" in="" significantly="" fewer="" dental="" caries.="" fda="" tentatively="" concludes="" that="" the="" overall="" results="" from="" human="" and="" animal="" studies="" strongly="" support="" the="" observation="" that="" xylitol="" does="" not="" promote="" acid="" production="" in="" plaque="" and,="" therefore,="" does="" not="" promote="" dental="" caries.="" b.="" sorbitol="" in="" its="" 1979="" report="" on="" sorbitol,="" faseb="" concluded="" that="" the="" weight="" of="" evidence="" from="" animal="" studies="" suggests="" that="" sorbitol="" is="" less="" cariogenic="" than="" sucrose="" and="" other="" fermentable="" sugars="" (ref.="" 15).="" the="" report="" noted="" that="" the="" results="" of="" human="" plaque="" studies="" show="" that="" sorbitol="" does="" not="" lower="" plaque="" ph="" below="" 5.5,="" the="" ph="" of="" plaque="" where="" decalcification="" may="" begin.="" faseb="" concluded="" that="" it="" could="" be="" assumed="" that="" sorbitol="" may="" have="" similar="" relative="" cariogenic="" properties="" in="" humans="" as="" observed="" in="" animals.="" the="" agency="" reviewed="" over="" 10="" clinical="" studies="" with="" sorbitol="" published="" since="" the="" faseb="" report.="" subjects="" consuming="" sorbitol-="" containing="" sweets="" between="" meals="" experienced="" fewer="" dental="" caries="" than="" those="" consuming="" sucrose-containing="" sweets.="" plaque="" ph="" and="" acid="" production="" studies="" consistently="" show="" that="" sorbitol="" is="" slowly="" fermented="" by="" plaque="" microflora="" and="" by="" s.="" mutans="" in="" particular.="" however,="" results="" show="" that="" plaque="" acid="" did="" not="" decrease="" ph="" to="" levels="" associated="" with="" incipient="" enamel="" decalcification="" (i.e.,="" approximately="" at="" ph="" 5.5="" or="" below).="" there="" is="" some="" evidence="" that="" suggests="" that="" long-term,="" uninterrupted="" use="" of="" sorbitol="" results="" in="" adaptation="" by="" s.="" mutans="" and="" other="" plaque="" microorganisms="" and,="" therefore,="" in="" more="" acid="" production.="" however,="" there="" are="" no="" human="" caries="" trials="" to="" show="" whether="" such="" adaptation="" results="" in="" a="" change="" in="" the="" incidence="" of="" dental="" caries.="" there="" is="" some="" evidence="" to="" show="" that="" adaptation="" may="" be="" lost="" in="" the="" presence="" of="" other="" sugars.="" the="" results="" of="" six="" animal="" studies="" confirmed="" the="" observations="" from="" human="" studies.="" the="" incidence="" of="" caries="" in="" animals="" consuming="" diets="" containing="" sorbitol="" was="" significantly="" less="" than="" the="" caries="" incidence="" in="" animals="" consuming="" diets="" containing="" sucrose.="" fda="" tentatively="" concludes="" that="" the="" overall="" results="" from="" human="" and="" animal="" studies="" show="" that="" oral="" bacteria="" cannot="" be="" sustained="" in="" the="" presence="" of="" sorbitol,="" and="" that="" changes="" in="" acidity="" are="" within="" a="" range="" that="" is="" safe="" for="" tooth="" enamel.="" c.="" mannitol="" in="" its="" 1979="" report="" on="" mannitol,="" faseb="" concluded="" that="" results="" of="" acid="" production,="" plaque="" ph="" changes,="" and="" changes="" in="" microhardness="" of="" bovine="" enamel="" were="" consistent="" with="" the="" results="" of="" animal="" experiments="" indicating="" that="" mannitol,="" in="" the="" absence="" of="" adaptation="" of="" the="" oral="" microflora,="" is="" less="" cariogenic="" than="" sucrose="" (ref.="" 16).="" one="" study="" evaluated="" plaque="" ph="" with="" mannitol="" in="" a="" concentrated="" plaque="" suspension="" in="" vitro="" (ref.="" 38).="" one="" and="" ten="" percent="" solutions="" of="" mannitol="" resulted="" in="" a="" plaque="" ph="" of="" 5.5="" or="" below.="" contrary="" to="" these="" results,="" however,="" three="" studies="" showed="" only="" slight="" acid="" production="" and="" small="" changes="" in="" plaque="" ph="" to="" a="" value="" not="" below="" ph="" 6.0="" from="" mannitol="" (refs.="" 39,="" 45,="" and="" 76).="" likewise,="" there="" was="" little="" evidence="" of="" demineralization="" from="" mannitol="" in="" vitro="" (ref.="" 76).="" two="" rat="" studies,="" in="" which="" mannitol="" was="" substituted="" for="" sucrose="" in="" animal="" chow,="" showed="" significantly="" fewer="" caries="" with="" the="" mannitol="" diet="" (refs.="" 59="" and="" 64).="" fda="" tentatively="" concludes="" that="" the="" overall="" results="" from="" both="" human="" and="" animal="" studies="" support="" the="" claim="" that="" mannitol="" does="" not="" promote="" dental="" caries.="" d.="" maltitol="" results="" of="" three="" ict's="" showed="" significantly="" less="" decalcification="" with="" maltitol="" than="" sucrose.="" additional="" plaque="" ph="" studies="" showed="" that="" maltitol="" is="" fermented="" very="" slowly="" (acid="" production="" of="" 10="" to="" 30="" percent)="" compared="" to="" sucrose="" and="" is="" associated="" with="" small="" plaque="" ph="" changes="" from="" resting="" baseline="" values.="" [[page="" 37524]]="" four="" animal="" studies="" confirmed="" that="" maltitol="" was="" significantly="" less="" cariogenic="" than="" sucrose.="" fda="" tentatively="" concludes="" that="" the="" overall="" results="" from="" both="" human="" and="" animal="" studies="" support="" the="" claim="" that="" maltitol="" does="" not="" promote="" dental="" caries.="" e.="" isomalt="" the="" agency="" reviewed="" two="" plaque="" ph="" studies="" evaluating="" the="" acidogenic="" potential="" of="" isomalt.="" results="" with="" 10="" percent="" isomalt="" showed="" a="" minimum="" in="" vitro="" plaque="" ph="" of="" 5.7.="" an="" intraoral="" test="" with="" a="" 20="" percent="" solution="" of="" isomalt="" reported="" a="" minimum="" ph="" of="" about="" 6.0.="" results="" of="" five="" animal="" studies="" consistently="" showed="" that="" isomalt="" was="" significantly="" less="" cariogenic="" than="" sucrose.="" fda="" tentatively="" concludes="" that="" the="" overall="" results="" show="" that="" isomalt="" does="" not="" lower="" plaque="" ph="" below="" 5.5="" and="" does="" not="" promote="" dental="" caries.="" f.="" lactitol="" two="" in="" vitro="" plaque="" ph="" studies="" showed="" that="" lactitol="" produced="" little="" acid="" and="" only="" slight="" changes="" in="" plaque="" ph="" from="" resting="" baseline="" values.="" results="" of="" two="" animal="" studies="" are="" consistent="" with="" these="" results="" and="" showed="" lactitol="" to="" be="" significantly="" less="" cariogenic="" than="" sucrose.="" the="" cariogenicity="" of="" lactitol="" was="" not="" significantly="" different="" than="" xylitol.="" fda="" tentatively="" concludes="" that="" the="" overall="" results="" support="" the="" claim="" that="" lactitol="" does="" not="" promote="" dental="" caries.="" g.="" hydrogenated="" starch="" hydrolysates="" and="" hydrogenated="" glucose="" syrups="" in="" an="" ict,="" a="" solution="" of="" hsh="" resulted="" in="" significantly="" less="" demineralization="" than="" sucrose.="" the="" investigators="" attributed="" the="" observed="" demineralization="" with="" hsh="" to="" an="" effect="" of="" other="" dietary="" components.="" the="" effects="" of="" sucrose="" on="" enamel="" demineralization,="" however,="" were="" noted="" to="" be="" over="" and="" above="" the="" effect="" of="" other="" dietary="" components.="" seven="" studies="" evaluating="" the="" effect="" of="" hsh="" on="" plaque="" ph="" showed="" inconsistent="" results="" in="" final="" ph="" values="" reported.="" the="" differences="" in="" results="" are="" attributed="" to="" the="" source="" of="" the="" hsh.="" hsh="" is="" manufactured="" by="" hydrolyzing="" a="" source="" of="" food="" grade="" starch="" (usually="" potato="" or="" corn="" starch)="" with="" acid="" or="" an="" enzyme="" to="" a="" mixture="" of="" sugars="" and="" dextrins="" of="" various="" glucose="" lengths="" (i.e.,="" glucose="" syrups).="" the="" hydrogenated="" mixture="" contains="" sorbitol,="" maltitol,="" maltitriol,="" maltotrititol,="" and="" hydrogenated="" dextrins="" of="" various="" molecular="" weights="" (ref.="" 79).="" the="" percentage="" of="" each="" component="" sugar="" alcohol="" in="" the="" final="" substance="" depends="" on="" the="" manufacturing="" process="" and="" controls.="" the="" two="" major="" forms="" of="" hsh="" (i.e.,="" one="" manufactured="" in="" sweden="" and="" the="" other="" in="" france)="" used="" in="" the="" studies="" reviewed="" gave="" dramatically="" different="" results="" in="" plaque="" ph="" and="" acid="" production="" tests.="" the="" swedish="" version,="" which="" has="" a="" higher="" percentage="" of="" higher="" molecular="" weight,="" fermentable="" polysaccharides="" than="" the="" french="" version,="" produced="" plaque="" ph="" values="" of="" 5.5="" to="" 6.0="" and="" an="" acid="" production="" of="" 50="" to="" 70="" percent="" compared="" to="" sucrose.="" the="" french="" version="" produced="" final="" plaque="" ph="" values="" above="" 6.0="" and="" an="" acid="" production="" rate="" of="" 20="" to="" 40="" percent="" of="" sucrose.="" results="" with="" hgs="" of="" unidentified="" composition="" showed="" minimum="" plaque="" ph="" values="" all="" above="" 6.0.="" results="" of="" 4="" rat="" studies="" support="" the="" observations="" that="" hsh="" (source="" not="" identified)="" is="" significantly="" less="" cariogenic="" than="" sucrose.="" fda="" tentatively="" concludes="" that="" the="" overall="" results="" support="" the="" claim="" that="" hsh="" and="" hgs="" do="" not="" promote="" dental="" caries.="" based="" on="" its="" review="" of="" the="" scientific="" evidence,="" the="" agency="" noted="" that="" the="" hsh="" and="" hgs="" sugar="" alcohol="" mixtures="" may="" vary="" in="" their="" acidogenic="" response="" in="" dental="" plaque.="" for="" example,="" hsh="" manufactured="" in="" sweden="" usually="" gave="" a="" lower="" plaque="" ph="" response="" than="" the="" french="" version="" of="" hsh.="" this="" variation="" in="" acidogenic="" response="" has="" been="" attributed="" to="" the="" differences="" in="" the="" chemical="" composition="" of="" these="" substances.="" hsh="" and="" hgs="" are="" not="" well="" defined="" chemical="" substances="" as="" are="" xylitol="" and="" sorbitol.="" instead,="" the="" sugar="" alcohol="" compositions="" of="" these="" substances="" will="" vary="" depending="" on="" the="" manufacturing="" process.="" therefore,="" the="" agency="" is="" asking="" for="" comments="" on="" how="" to="" determine="" whether="" sugar="" alcohol="" mixtures,="" such="" as="" hsh,="" when="" used="" in="" a="" food="" whose="" label="" bears="" a="" dental="" caries="" health="" claim,="" are="" in="" compliance="" with="" any="" final="" rule="" resulting="" from="" this="" proposal.="" v.="" decision="" to="" propose="" an="" exemption="" from="" sec.="" 101.14(e)(6)="" for="" chewing="" gum="" and="" confectioneries="" section="" 101.14(e)(6)="" provides,="" as="" stated="" above,="" that="" except="" for="" dietary="" supplements="" or="" where="" provided="" for="" in="" other="" regulations="" in="" part="" 101,="" subpart="" e,="" to="" be="" eligible="" to="" bear="" a="" health="" claim,="" a="" food="" must="" contain="" 10="" percent="" or="" more="" of="" the="" reference="" daily="" intake="" or="" the="" daily="" reference="" value="" for="" vitamin="" a,="" vitamin="" c,="" iron,="" calcium,="" protein,="" or="" fiber="" per="" reference="" amount="" customarily="" consumed="" before="" there="" is="" any="" nutrient="" addition.="" the="" petition="" states="" that="" products="" containing="" sugar="" alcohols="" often="" will="" not="" be="" able="" to="" satisfy="" the="" requirement="" of="" sec.="" 101.14(e)(6)="" because="" the="" products="" utilizing="" sugar="" alcohols="" are="" largely="" chewing="" gum="" and="" confectioneries,="" none="" of="" which="" are="" a="" significant="" source="" of="" any="" nutrients.="" the="" petition="" states="" that="" the="" use="" of="" these="" products="" in="" lieu="" of="" traditional="" sugar-based="" confectionery="" would="" be="" consistent="" with="" public="" health="" recommendations,="" and="" that="" the="" health="" claim="" statement,="" ``useful="" only="" in="" not="" promoting="" tooth="" decay,''="" is="" an="" important="" and="" useful="" message="" for="" consumers="" in="" making="" decisions="" on="" which="" foods="" to="" purchase.="" fda="" has="" tentatively="" determined="" that="" there="" is="" significant="" public="" health="" evidence="" to="" support="" providing="" an="" exemption="" to="" sec.="" 101.14(e)(6)="" for="" sugar="" alcohol-containing="" foods,="" e.g.,="" chewing="" gums,="" hard="" candies,="" and="" mints.="" in="" the="" surgeon="" general's="" report="" (ref.="" 7),="" dental="" caries="" is="" recognized="" as="" an="" important="" and="" widespread="" public="" health="" problem="" in="" the="" united="" states.="" although="" dental="" caries="" among="" children="" are="" declining,="" the="" overall="" prevalence="" of="" the="" condition="" imposes="" a="" substantial="" economic="" burden="" on="" american="" health="" care="" costs.="" the="" surgeon="" general's="" report="" states="" that="" of="" the="" 13="" leading="" health="" problems="" in="" the="" united="" states,="" dental="" disorders="" rank="" second="" in="" direct="" costs="" (ref.="" 7).="" the="" role="" of="" sugars,="" and="" of="" sucrose="" in="" particular,="" in="" the="" etiology="" of="" dental="" caries="" is="" well="" established.="" caries-producing="" bacteria="" can="" readily="" metabolize="" a="" range="" of="" simple="" sugars="" (e.g.,="" sucrose,="" glucose,="" fructose)="" to="" acids="" that="" can="" demineralize="" teeth.="" the="" unique="" role="" of="" sucrose,="" however,="" is="" related="" to="" its="" ability="" to="" be="" used="" by="" s.="" mutans,="" the="" primary="" etiologic="" agent="" in="" coronal="" caries,="" and="" other="" oral="" bacteria="" to="" form="" extracellular="" polymers="" of="" glucose="" or="" fructose="" that="" adhere="" firmly="" to="" tooth="" surfaces="" (ref.="" 7).="" the="" surgeon="" general's="" report="" recommends="" several="" types="" of="" intervention="" to="" help="" reduce="" the="" risk="" of="" dental="" caries.="" the="" diet-related="" factors="" include="" the="" use="" of="" fluoridated="" drinking="" water="" and="" control="" of="" sugars="" consumption.="" in="" this="" regard,="" the="" surgeon="" general's="" report="" recommends="" that="" those="" who="" are="" particularly="" vulnerable="" to="" dental="" caries,="" especially="" children,="" should="" limit="" their="" consumption="" and="" frequency="" of="" use="" of="" foods="" containing="" relatively="" high="" levels="" of="" sugars.="" fda="" agrees="" that="" limiting="" the="" amount="" of="" sugars="" in="" the="" diet="" is="" one="" important="" approach="" to="" help="" reduce="" the="" risk="" of="" dental="" caries.="" sugar="" alcohols="" can="" be="" used="" to="" replace="" dietary="" sugars="" in="" food="" by="" providing="" sweetness="" and="" usefulness="" as="" bulking="" agents.="" sugar="" alcohol-containing="" chewing="" gum="" and="" confectioneries,="" such="" as="" hard="" candies="" and="" mints,="" are="" specifically="" formulated="" without="" dietary="" sugars.="" although="" these="" foods="" have="" little="" or="" no="" nutritional="" value,="" [[page="" 37525]]="" they="" are="" an="" important="" alternative="" to="" sucrose-containing="" snacks.="" therefore,="" fda="" tentatively="" finds="" that="" the="" use="" of="" health="" claims="" on="" the="" label="" of="" sugar="" alcohol-containing="" products="" will="" facilitate="" compliance="" with="" dietary="" guidelines="" that="" recommend="" a="" reduced="" intake="" of="" dietary="" sugars="" to="" reduce="" the="" risk="" of="" dental="" caries.="" moreover,="" the="" sugar="" alcohol="" and="" dental="" caries="" health="" claim,="" if="" authorized,="" will="" apply="" in="" large="" measure,="" although="" not="" entirely,="" to="" snack="" foods="" that="" do="" not="" play="" a="" fundamental="" role="" in="" structuring="" a="" healthy="" diet.="" section="" 101.14(e)(6)="" was="" included="" in="" fda's="" regulations="" to="" ensure="" that="" those="" foods="" that="" bear="" a="" health="" claim="" are="" useful="" in="" structuring="" a="" healthy="" diet.="" usually="" usefulness="" in="" structuring="" a="" healthy="" diet="" derives="" from="" the="" vitamin,="" mineral,="" protein,="" or="" fiber="" content="" of="" the="" food.="" in="" this="" case,="" however,="" fda="" tentatively="" finds="" that="" the="" replacement="" of="" dietary="" sugars="" with="" sugar="" alcohols="" will="" help="" reduce="" the="" risk="" of="" dental="" caries="" and="" thus="" will="" help="" to="" facilitate="" compliance="" with="" the="" dietary="" guidelines.="" in="" recognition="" of="" the="" special="" character="" of="" the="" foods="" involved,="" fda="" tentatively="" concludes="" that="" it="" is="" appropriate="" to="" exempt="" these="" food="" products="" from="" sec.="" 101.14(e)(6).="" therefore,="" in="" new="" sec.="" 101.80(c)(1),="" fda="" is="" proposing="" to="" exempt="" sugar="" alcohol-containing="" food="" products="" from="" the="" provisions="" of="" paragraph="" 101.14(e)(6).="" vi.="" description="" and="" rationale="" for="" components="" of="" health="" claim="" a.="" relationship="" between="" sugar="" alcohols="" and="" dental="" caries="" in="" proposed="" sec.="" 101.80(a),="" fda="" describes="" the="" relationship="" between="" sugar="" alcohols="" and="" dental="" caries.="" dental="" caries="" is="" a="" multifactorial="" disease,="" characterized="" by="" the="" demineralization="" of="" the="" surface="" of="" tooth="" enamel="" by="" acid-forming="" organisms="" in="" dental="" plaque.="" it="" is="" well="" established="" that="" the="" relationship="" between="" sugars="" consumption="" and="" dental="" caries="" is="" one="" of="" cause="" and="" effect="" within="" the="" multifactorial="" context="" (refs.="" 71="" and="" 72).="" the="" role="" of="" sucrose="" in="" the="" etiology="" of="" dental="" caries="" is="" related="" to="" its="" ability="" to="" be="" metabolized="" by="" oral="" bacteria="" into="" extracellular="" polymers="" that="" adhere="" firmly="" to="" the="" tooth="" surfaces,="" at="" the="" same="" time="" forming="" acids="" that="" can="" demineralize="" tooth="" enamel="" (ref.="" 7).="" the="" extracellular="" polymers="" that="" adhere="" to="" tooth="" surfaces="" (i.e.,="" plaque)="" facilitate="" the="" further="" attachment="" of="" additional="" plaque="" to="" teeth="" and="" the="" proliferation="" of="" bacteria.="" although="" saliva="" can="" help="" neutralize="" plaque="" acids="" and="" influence="" the="" attachment="" of="" oral="" bacteria="" to="" the="" tooth="" surface="" (ref.="" 7),="" it="" has="" limited="" access="" to="" the="" acids="" generated="" at="" the="" tooth="" surface="" beneath="" the="" plaque.="" diets="" in="" the="" united="" states="" tend="" to="" be="" high="" in="" sugars.="" although="" there="" has="" been="" a="" decline="" in="" the="" prevalence="" of="" dental="" caries="" in="" the="" united="" states,="" there="" has="" been="" no="" decline="" in="" the="" consumption="" of="" sugars.="" furthermore,="" the="" incidence="" of="" dental="" caries="" is="" still="" widespread="" (ref.="" 7).="" sugar="" alcohols="" are="" used="" as="" sweeteners="" and="" bulking="" agents="" to="" replace="" dietary="" sugars="" in="" foods.="" because="" of="" their="" composition,="" sugar="" alcohols="" are="" not="" as="" fermentable="" by="" plaque="" bacteria="" as="" sucrose="" and="" are,="" therefore,="" less="" cariogenic="" than="" dietary="" sugars.="" replacing="" dietary="" sugars="" with="" sugar="" alcohols="" helps="" to="" maintain="" dental="" health.="" b.="" significance="" of="" sugar="" alcohols="" in="" the="" caries="" process="" as="" explained="" in="" section="" iv="" of="" this="" document,="" based="" on="" the="" totality="" of="" the="" publicly="" available="" evidence,="" fda="" has="" tentatively="" concluded="" that="" there="" is="" significant="" scientific="" agreement="" among="" experts="" qualified="" by="" training="" and="" experience="" to="" evaluate="" such="" claims="" that="" there="" is="" adequate="" scientific="" evidence="" to="" conclude="" that="" the="" sugar="" alcohols="" xylitol,="" sorbitol,="" mannitol,="" maltitol,="" isomalt,="" lactitol,="" hsh,="" and="" hgs="" are="" less="" cariogenic="" than="" sucrose="" and="" do="" not="" promote="" dental="" caries.="" in="" proposed="" sec.="" 101.80(b),="" fda="" discusses="" the="" significance="" of="" the="" relationship="" between="" sugar="" alcohols="" and="" dental="" caries.="" sugar="" alcohols="" have="" been="" shown="" in="" human="" and="" animal="" studies="" to="" be="" nonfermentable="" (i.e.,="" xylitol)="" or="" slowly="" fermentable="" (i.e.,="" sorbitol,="" maltitol,="" mannitol,="" isomalt,="" lactitol,="" hsh,="" and="" hgs)="" by="" s.="" mutans="" and="" other="" acid-forming="" microorganisms="" in="" dental="" plaque.="" human="" studies="" have="" shown="" a="" reduced="" rate="" of="" acid="" production="" in="" plaque="" and,="" in="" some="" studies,="" a="" reduced="" incidence="" of="" dental="" caries="" from="" the="" use="" of="" sugar="" alcohol-="" containing="" products.="" c.="" nature="" of="" the="" claim="" in="" new="" sec.="" 101.80(c)(1),="" fda="" is="" proposing="" that="" all="" requirements="" of="" sec.="" 101.14="" be="" met="" except,="" as="" explained="" above,="" that="" sugar="" alcohol-="" containing="" foods="" are="" exempt="" from="" sec.="" 101.14(e)(6).="" under="" sec.="" 101.14(d)(3),="" nutrition="" labeling="" in="" accordance="" with="" sec.="" 101.9="" must="" be="" provided="" on="" the="" label="" or="" labeling="" of="" any="" food="" for="" which="" a="" health="" claim="" is="" made.="" therefore,="" if="" fda="" adopts="" this="" proposed="" regulation,="" the="" labeling="" of="" the="" amount="" of="" sugar="" alcohol="" in="" a="" serving="" will="" have="" to="" be="" declared="" on="" the="" nutrition="" label="" in="" accordance="" with="" sec.="" 101.9(c)(6)(iii)="" when="" a="" claim="" is="" made="" on="" the="" label="" or="" in="" labeling="" about="" sugar="" alcohols="" and="" dental="" caries.="" in="" new="" sec.="" 101.80(c)(2)(i),="" fda="" is="" proposing="" to="" authorize="" a="" health="" claim="" on="" the="" relationship="" between="" sugar="" alcohols="" and="" the="" nonpromotion="" of="" dental="" caries.="" this="" action="" is="" consistent="" with="" the="" agency's="" review="" of="" the="" scientific="" evidence,="" which="" showed="" that,="" although="" sugar="" alcohols="" are="" slowly="" fermented="" by="" s.="" mutans="" and="" can="" form="" some="" acid,="" they="" do="" not="" contribute="" to="" the="" promotion="" of="" dental="" caries.="" in="" new="" sec.="" 101.80(c)(2)(i)(a),="" the="" agency="" is="" proposing="" to="" require="" that="" in="" describing="" the="" relationship="" between="" sugar="" alcohols="" and="" dental="" caries,="" the="" claim="" states="" ``does="" not="" promote,''="" ``useful="" in="" not="" promoting,''="" or="" ``expressly="" for="" not="" promoting''="" dental="" caries.="" fda="" finds="" that="" these="" terms="" accurately="" describe="" the="" relationship="" between="" sugar="" alcohol="" consumption="" and="" dental="" caries.="" in="" new="" sec.="" 101.80(c)(2)(i)(b),="" the="" agency="" is="" proposing="" to="" require="" that="" the="" terms="" ``dental="" caries''="" or="" ``tooth="" decay''="" be="" used="" in="" specifying="" the="" disease.="" these="" terms="" are="" commonly="" used="" in="" dental="" and="" dietary="" guidance="" materials="" and="" are="" familiar="" to="" consumers.="" under="" sec.="" 101.14(d),="" a="" health="" claim="" must="" be="" complete,="" truthful,="" and="" not="" misleading.="" it="" must="" enable="" the="" public="" to="" comprehend="" the="" information="" provided="" and="" to="" understand="" the="" relative="" significance="" of="" such="" information="" in="" the="" context="" of="" a="" total="" daily="" diet.="" in="" addition,="" a="" health="" claim="" may="" not="" attribute="" any="" specific="" degree="" of="" reduction="" in="" risk="" of="" disease="" from="" consumption="" of="" the="" product.="" in="" recognition="" of="" these="" general="" requirements,="" and="" in="" light="" of="" the="" fact="" that="" both="" environmental="" and="" genetic="" factors,="" as="" well="" as="" eating="" behaviors,="" all="" affect="" a="" person's="" risk="" of="" developing="" dental="" caries="" (see="" proposed="" sec.="" 101.80(a)(1)),="" fda="" is="" proposing="" in="" sec.="" 101.80(c)(2)(i)(c)="" that="" for="" packages="" that="" have="" a="" total="" surface="" area="" available="" for="" labeling="" of="" 15="" or="" more="" square="" inches,="" the="" claim="" must="" state="" that="" dental="" caries="" depends="" on="" many="" factors.="" fda="" is="" aware="" that="" many="" sugar="" alcohol-containing="" chewing="" gum="" and="" confectionery="" products="" have="" a="" total="" surface="" area="" available="" for="" labeling="" of="" less="" than="" 15="" square="" inches,="" however.="" such="" a="" small="" area="" would="" preclude="" the="" use="" of="" a="" health="" claim="" that="" included="" all="" of="" the="" required="" elements.="" many="" of="" these="" products,="" packaged="" in="" small="" packages,="" have="" used="" the="" claim="" ``useful="" only="" in="" not="" promoting="" dental="" caries''="" on="" their="" labels="" for="" more="" than="" 15="" years.="" because="" of="" the="" potential="" dental="" health="" benefits="" to="" consumers="" resulting="" from="" a="" positive="" action="" on="" this="" proposal="" and="" given="" the="" unique="" history="" of="" this="" claim,="" the="" agency="" tentatively="" finds="" that="" continued="" use="" of="" an="" abbreviated="" claim="" on="" packages="" with="" less="" than="" 15="" square="" inches="" of="" surface="" area="" will="" not="" be="" misleading="" or="" confusing="" [[page="" 37526]]="" to="" consumers="" of="" these="" products.="" however,="" the="" agency="" continues="" to="" believe="" that="" the="" fact="" that="" dental="" caries="" are="" multifactorial="" in="" their="" etiology="" is="" fundamental="" to="" an="" understanding="" of="" the="" claim.="" therefore,="" the="" agency="" tentatively="" concludes="" that="" this="" fact="" is="" a="" material="" fact,="" and="" that="" it="" must="" be="" disclosed="" on="" packages="" with="" space="" available="" for="" labeling="" of="" 15="" or="" more="" square="" inches.="" in="" sec.="" 101.80(c)(2)(i)(d),="" given="" the="" unique="" circumstances="" surrounding="" this="" claim,="" fda="" is="" proposing="" to="" exempt="" packages="" with="" a="" total="" surface="" area="" available="" for="" labeling="" of="" less="" than="" 15="" square="" inches="" from="" the="" provisions="" of="" sec.="" 101.80(c)(2)(i)(c).="" in="" proposed="" sec.="" 101.80(c)(2)(i)(e),="" fda="" states="" that="" the="" claim="" must="" not="" attribute="" any="" degree="" of="" nonpromotion="" of="" dental="" caries="" to="" the="" use="" of="" the="" sugar="" alcohol-containing="" food.="" based="" on="" the="" agency's="" review="" of="" human="" and="" animal="" studies="" in="" this="" document,="" none="" of="" the="" studies="" provide="" a="" basis="" for="" determining="" the="" percent="" reduction="" in="" risk="" of="" dental="" caries="" from="" consuming="" sugar="" alcohol-containing="" foods.="" this="" requirement="" is="" also="" consistent="" with="" the="" general="" requirements="" for="" health="" claims="" in="" sec.="" 101.14(d),="" and="" those="" health="" claims="" authorized="" under="" part="" 101,="" subpart="" e.="" d.="" nature="" of="" the="" food="" in="" sec.="" 101.80(c)(2)(ii)(a),="" fda="" is="" proposing="" to="" require="" that="" the="" food="" bearing="" this="" health="" claim="" meet="" the="" requirement="" in="" sec.="" 101.60(c)(1)(i)="" with="" respect="" to="" sugars="" content,="" that="" is,="" qualify="" to="" bear="" the="" claim="" ``sugar="" free.''="" this="" requirement="" is="" consistent="" with="" the="" scientific="" evidence="" showing="" that="" foods="" with="" a="" mixture="" of="" sugar="" alcohols="" and="" sugars="" are="" still="" acidogenic="" (ref.="" 38)="" and="" cariogenic="" (refs.="" 52,="" 55,="" and="" 56,="" for="" examples).="" in="" new="" sec.="" 101.80(c)(2)(ii)(b),="" the="" agency="" is="" proposing="" that="" the="" sugar="" alcohols="" be="" limited="" to="" xylitol,="" sorbitol,="" mannitol,="" maltitol,="" isomalt,="" lactitol,="" hsh,="" hgs,="" or="" a="" combination="" of="" these.="" this="" requirement="" reflects="" the="" available="" scientific="" evidence="" on="" the="" sugar="" alcohols="" and="" their="" effects="" on="" the="" promotion="" of="" dental="" caries.="" sugar="" alcohols="" in="" combination="" with="" high="" intensity="" sugar="" substitutes,="" such="" as="" aspartame="" and="" saccharin,="" are="" also="" used="" to="" replace="" sucrose.="" the="" agency="" notes="" that="" under="" proposed="" sec.="" 101.80(c)(2)(ii)(a)="" and="" (c)(2)(ii)(b),="" a="" sugar="" alcohol="" and="" dental="" caries="" claim="" could="" appear="" on="" a="" food="" that="" contains="" a="" combination="" of="" sugar="" alcohols="" and="" high="" intensity="" sweeteners="" but="" no="" sugars.="" the="" agency="" notes="" that="" high="" intensity="" sweeteners="" are="" not="" considered="" fermentable="" by="" oral="" bacteria="" (ref.="" 75).="" the="" agency="" is="" not="" specifying="" a="" level="" of="" sugar="" alcohols="" in="" the="" food="" product="" because="" these="" ingredients="" are="" being="" used="" as="" a="" substitute="" for="" sugars.="" therefore,="" the="" amount="" of="" the="" substance="" required="" is="" that="" needed="" to="" achieve="" a="" desired="" level="" of="" sweetness.="" in="" new="" sec.="" 101.80(c)(2)(ii)(c),="" the="" agency="" is="" proposing="" that="" to="" qualify="" to="" bear="" a="" claim,="" the="" sugar="" alcohol-containing="" food,="" when="" tested="" for="" its="" effects="" on="" plaque="" ph="" using="" in="" vivo="" methods,="" must="" not="" lower="" plaque="" ph="" below="" 5.7.="" based="" on="" the="" agency's="" review="" of="" the="" scientific="" evidence,="" foods="" that="" lowered="" plaque="" ph="" below="" 5.5="" were="" contributing="" to="" an="" acidic="" environment="" in="" the="" mouth="" that="" is="" detrimental="" to="" tooth="" enamel.="" although="" a="" ``critical''="" plaque="" ph="" has="" not="" been="" defined,="" changes="" in="" ph="" to="" a="" minimum="" that="" is="" above="" 5.5="" are="" generally="" considered="" above="" the="" level="" where="" enamel="" decalcification="" would="" be="" promoted="" (refs.="" 8,="" 75,="" 86,="" and="" 87).="" in="" its="" review="" of="" the="" scientific="" evidence,="" the="" agency="" noted="" that="" sugar="" alcohol-containing="" chewing="" gum="" and="" confectioneries,="" such="" as="" mints,="" that="" do="" not="" contain="" fermentable="" carbohydrates,="" did="" not="" lower="" plaque="" ph="" below="" 5.5.="" however,="" in="" one="" study="" that="" evaluated="" the="" cariogenic="" potential="" of="" an="" experimental="" licorice="" that="" contained="" soy="" flour,="" the="" soy="" flour="" was="" shown="" to="" be="" highly="" fermentable="" and="" dropped="" plaque="" ph="" to="" below="" 5.5="" (ref.="" 43).="" the="" agency="" is="" concerned="" that="" use="" of="" sugar="" alcohols="" in="" a="" food="" product="" that="" contains="" an="" ingredient,="" such="" as="" refined="" flour,="" that="" would="" cause="" plaque="" ph="" to="" drop="" below="" 5.5="" would="" thus="" cause="" the="" food="" to="" be="" cariogenic.="" in="" the="" swiss="" ``zahnschonend''="" program,="" if="" a="" food="" does="" not="" promote="" a="" drop="" in="" plaque="" ph,="" using="" intraoral="" plaque="" ph="" telemetric="" tests,="" below="" 5.7="" by="" bacterial="" fermentation="" either="" during="" consumption="" or="" up="" to="" 30="" min="" later,="" the="" food="" is="" considered="" ``safe="" for="" teeth''="" and="" may="" be="" labeled="" as="" such="" (ref.="" 75).="" the="" intraoral="" plaque="" ph="" telemetric="" test="" is="" an="" in="" vivo="" method="" that="" measures="" the="" acidogenicity="" of="" foods="" and="" dietary="" patterns.="" based="" on="" experience="" and="" experimentation,="" foods="" judged="" by="" the="" swiss="" program="" to="" be="" safe="" for="" teeth="" are="" those="" that="" have="" been="" shown="" not="" to="" promote="" dental="" decay="" in="" animal="" or="" human="" model="" systems="" (ref.="" 75).="" in="" this="" proposed="" rule,="" fda="" is="" proposing="" to="" require="" in="" sec.="" 101.80(c)(2)(ii)(c)="" that="" to="" be="" eligible="" to="" bear="" the="" claim,="" the="" food="" product="" not="" lower="" plaque="" ph="" below="" 5.7,="" based="" on="" in="" vivo="" measurements,="" during="" the="" time="" food="" is="" consumed="" and="" for="" up="" to="" 30="" min="" after="" the="" food="" is="" consumed.="" the="" agency="" is="" proposing="" a="" more="" conservative="" value="" than="" ph="" 5.5="" because="" such="" a="" value="" gives="" assurance="" that,="" consistent="" with="" the="" health="" claim,="" the="" food="" will="" not="" promote="" dental="" caries.="" the="" methods="" that="" have="" been="" described="" as="" the="" most="" suitable="" for="" assessing="" plaque="" acidity="" of="" dietary="" constituents="" in="" humans="" are="" indwelling="" electrode="" systems,="" such="" as="" the="" intraoral="" plaque="" ph="" telemetric="" test="" used="" in="" the="" swiss="" program="" (refs.="" 8="" and="" 75).="" ict's="" (ref.="" 88),="" which="" incorporate="" enamel="" blocks="" into="" dental="" appliances="" for="" the="" production="" of="" carious="" lesions="" when="" used="" in="" combination="" with="" intraoral="" plaque="" ph="" telemetry,="" are="" also="" good="" methods="" for="" assessing="" changes="" in="" plaque="" ph="" in="" response="" to="" food.="" the="" agency="" is="" asking="" for="" comments="" on="" whether="" establishing="" a="" minimum="" plaque="" ph="" that="" is="" measured="" in="" vivo="" during="" consumption="" and="" up="" to="" 30="" min="" following="" consumption="" is="" a="" reasonable="" approach="" to="" use="" to="" determine="" whether="" a="" sugar="" alcohol-="" containing="" food,="" other="" than="" sugar="" alcohol-containing="" chewing="" gum="" and="" confectioneries,="" that="" contains="" other="" carbohydrate="" ingredients="" is="" in="" compliance="" with="" any="" final="" rule="" resulting="" from="" this="" proposal.="" e.="" optional="" information="" fda="" is="" proposing="" in="" new="" sec.="" 101.80(d)(1),="" consistent="" with="" the="" regulations="" that="" have="" authorized="" other="" health="" claims,="" that="" health="" claims="" about="" the="" relationship="" between="" sugar="" alcohols="" and="" dental="" caries="" may="" provide="" additional="" information="" that="" is="" drawn="" from="" proposed="" sec.="" 101.80="" (a)="" and="" (b).="" in="" new="" sec.="" 101.80(d)(2),="" the="" agency="" is="" proposing="" that="" when="" referring="" to="" sucrose,="" the="" claim="" may="" use="" the="" term="" ``sucrose''="" or="" ``sugar.''="" the="" use="" of="" either="" of="" these="" terms="" is="" consistent="" with="" fda's="" regulation="" that="" affirms="" that="" use="" of="" this="" substance="" is="" gras="" (sec.="" 184.1854).="" fda="" is="" proposing="" in="" sec.="" 101.80(d)(3),="" consistent="" with="" the="" health="" claims="" that="" it="" has="" already="" authorized="" under="" part="" 101,="" subpart="" e,="" to="" allow="" manufacturers="" to="" provide="" additional="" information="" about="" risk="" factors="" associated="" with="" the="" development="" of="" dental="" caries.="" although="" sugars="" consumption="" and="" infection="" with="" s.="" mutans="" are="" often="" identified="" as="" the="" cause="" of="" dental="" caries,="" there="" are="" several="" risk="" factors="" that="" play="" significant="" roles="" in="" the="" etiology="" of="" this="" disease="" (ref.="" 71).="" these="" factors="" include="" frequent="" consumption="" of="" sucrose="" or="" other="" fermentable="" carbohydrates,="" presence="" of="" oral="" bacteria="" capable="" of="" fermenting="" sugars,="" length="" of="" time="" sugars="" are="" in="" contact="" with="" the="" teeth,="" lack="" of="" exposure="" to="" fluoride,="" individual="" susceptibility,="" socioeconomic="" and="" cultural="" factors,="" and="" characteristics="" of="" tooth="" enamel,="" saliva,="" and="" plaque="" (refs.="" 7,="" 71,="" and="" 89).="" [[page="" 37527]]="" f.="" model="" health="" claims="" in="" proposed="" sec.="" 101.80(e),="" fda="" is="" providing="" model="" health="" claims="" to="" illustrate="" the="" requirements="" of="" new="" sec.="" 101.80.="" fda="" emphasizes="" that="" these="" model="" health="" claims="" are="" illustrative="" only.="" if="" the="" agency="" authorizes="" claims="" about="" the="" relationship="" between="" sugar="" alcohols="" and="" dental="" caries,="" manufacturers="" will="" be="" free="" to="" design="" their="" own="" claim="" so="" long="" as="" it="" is="" consistent="" with="" sec.="" 101.80(c).="" vii.="" environmental="" impact="" the="" agency="" has="" determined="" under="" 21="" cfr="" 25.24="" (a)(11)="" that="" this="" action="" is="" of="" a="" type="" that="" does="" not="" individually="" or="" cumulatively="" have="" a="" significant="" effect="" on="" the="" human="" environment.="" therefore,="" neither="" an="" environmental="" assessment="" nor="" an="" environmental="" impact="" statement="" is="" required.="" viii.="" analysis="" of="" impacts="" fda="" has="" examined="" the="" impacts="" of="" the="" proposed="" rule="" under="" executive="" order="" 12866="" and="" the="" regulatory="" flexibility="" act="" (pub.="" l.="" 96-354).="" executive="" order="" 12866="" directs="" agencies="" to="" assess="" all="" costs="" and="" benefits="" of="" available="" regulatory="" alternatives="" and,="" when="" regulation="" is="" necessary,="" to="" select="" regulatory="" approaches="" that="" maximize="" net="" benefits="" (including="" potential="" economic,="" environmental,="" public="" health="" and="" safety,="" and="" other="" advantages;="" distributive="" impacts;="" and="" equity).="" the="" agency="" believes="" that="" this="" proposed="" rule="" is="" consistent="" with="" the="" regulatory="" philosophy="" and="" principles="" identified="" in="" the="" executive="" order.="" in="" addition,="" the="" proposed="" rule="" is="" not="" a="" significant="" regulatory="" action="" as="" defined="" by="" the="" executive="" order="" and="" so="" is="" not="" subject="" to="" review="" under="" the="" executive="" order.="" the="" regulatory="" flexibility="" act="" requires="" agencies="" to="" analyze="" regulatory="" options="" that="" would="" minimize="" any="" significant="" impact="" of="" a="" rule="" on="" small="" entities.="" because="" it="" enables="" firms="" to="" make="" claims="" that="" they="" would="" otherwise="" be="" prohibited="" from="" making,="" the="" agency="" certifies="" that="" the="" proposed="" rule="" will="" not="" have="" a="" significant="" economic="" impact="" on="" a="" substantial="" number="" of="" small="" entities.="" therefore,="" under="" the="" regulatory="" flexibility="" act,="" no="" further="" analysis="" is="" required.="" ix.="" effective="" date="" fda="" is="" proposing="" to="" make="" these="" regulations="" effective="" 30="" days="" after="" the="" publication="" of="" a="" final="" rule="" based="" on="" this="" proposal.="" x.="" comments="" interested="" persons="" may,="" on="" or="" before="" october="" 3,="" 1995,="" submit="" to="" the="" dockets="" management="" branch="" (hfa-305),="" food="" and="" drug="" administration,="" rm.="" 1-23,="" 12420="" parklawn="" dr.,="" rockville,="" md="" 20857,="" written="" comments="" regarding="" this="" proposal.="" two="" copies="" of="" any="" comments="" are="" to="" be="" submitted,="" except="" that="" individuals="" may="" submit="" one="" copy.="" comments="" are="" to="" be="" identified="" with="" the="" docket="" number="" found="" in="" brackets="" in="" the="" heading="" of="" this="" document.="" received="" comments="" may="" be="" seen="" in="" the="" office="" above="" between="" 9="" a.m.="" and="" 4="" p.m.,="" monday="" through="" friday.="" xi.="" references="" the="" following="" references="" have="" been="" placed="" on="" display="" in="" the="" dockets="" management="" branch="" (address="" above)="" and="" may="" be="" seen="" by="" interested="" persons="" between="" 9="" a.="" m.="" and="" 4="" p.="" m.,="" monday="" through="" friday.="" 1.="" drozen,="" melvin="" s.,="" ``health="" claim="" petition="" regarding="" the="" noncariogenicity="" of="" sugar="" alcohols,''="" august="" 31,="" 1994.="" 2.="" drozen,="" melvin="" s.,="" ``objections="" and="" request="" for="" a="" hearing="" by="" working="" group="" of="" sugar="" alcohol="" manufacturers="" to="" the="" revocation="" of="" 21="" c.f.r.="" section="" 105.66(f),''="" docket="" no.="" 91n-384l,="" dockets="" management="" branch,="" fda,="" rockville,="" md.="" 3.="" saltsman,="" joyce="" j.,="" cfsan,="" fda,="" letter="" to="" melvin="" s.="" drozen,="" september="" 15,="" 1994.="" 4.="" saltsman,="" joyce="" j.,="" cfsan,="" fda,="" letter="" to="" melvin="" s.="" drozen,="" october="" 7,="" 1994.="" 5.="" drozen,="" melvin="" s.,="" letter="" to="" fda,="" november="" 15,="" 1994.="" 6.="" saltsman,="" joyce="" j.,="" cfsan,="" fda,="" memorandum="" of="" telephone="" conversation,="" december="" 8,="" 1994.="" 7.="" dhhs,="" public="" health="" service="" (phs),="" ``the="" surgeon="" general's="" report="" on="" nutrition="" and="" health,''="" u.s.="" government="" printing="" office,="" washington,="" dc,="" 1988.="" 8.="" harper,="" d.="" s.,="" d.="" c.="" abelson,="" and="" m.="" e.="" jensen,="" ``human="" plaque="" acidity="" models,''="" journal="" of="" dental="" research,="" 65="" (special="" issue):1503-="" 1510,="" 1986.="" 9.="" ten="" cate,="" j.="" m.,="" ``demineralization="" models:="" mechanistic="" aspects="" of="" the="" caries="" process="" with="" special="" emphasis="" on="" the="" possible="" role="" of="" foods,''="" journal="" of="" dental="" research,="" 65="" (special="" issue):1511-1515,="" 1986.="" 10.="" curzon,="" m.="" e.="" j.,="" ``integration="" of="" methods="" for="" determining="" the="" cariogenic="" potential="" of="" foods:="" is="" this="" possible="" with="" present="" technologies?,''="" journal="" of="" dental="" research,="" 65="" (special="" issue):1520-="" 1524,="" 1986.="" 11.="" stookey,="" g.="" k.,="" ``considerations="" in="" determining="" the="" cariogenic="" potential="" of="" foods:="" how="" should="" existing="" knowledge="" be="" combined?,''="" journal="" of="" dental="" research,="" 65(special="" issue):1525-1527,="" 1986.="" 12.="" working="" group="" consensus="" report,="" ``integration="" of="" methods,''="" journal="" of="" dental="" research,="" 65(special="" issue):1537-1539,="" 1986.="" 13.="" depaola,="" d.="" p.,="" ``executive="" summary,''="" scientific="" consensus="" conference="" on="" methods="" for="" assessment="" of="" the="" cariogenic="" potential="" of="" foods,="" journal="" of="" dental="" research,="" 65(special="" issue)1540-1543,="" 1986.="" 14.="" lsro,="" faseb,="" ``dietary="" sugars="" in="" health="" and="" disease,="" ii.="" xylitol,''="" bethesda,="" md,="" july,="" 1978.="" 15.="" lsro,="" faseb,="" ``dietary="" sugars="" in="" health="" and="" disease,="" iii.="" sorbitol,''="" bethesda,="" md,="" july,="" 1978.="" 16.="" lsro,="" faseb,="" ``dietary="" sugars="" in="" health="" and="" disease,="" iv.="" mannitol,''="" bethesda,="" md,="" july,="" 1978.="" 17.="" working="" group="" consensus="" report,="" ``animal="" caries,''="" journal="" of="" dental="" research,="" 65:1528-1529,="" 1986.="" 18.="" working="" group="" consensus="" report,="" ``human="" plaque="" acidity,''="" journal="" of="" dental="" research,="" 65:1530-1531,="" 1986.="" 19.="" working="" group="" consensus="" report,="" ``demineralization/="" remineralization,''="" journal="" of="" dental="" research,="" 65:1532-1536,="" 1986.="" 20.="" moller,="" i.="" j.,="" and="" s.="" poulsen,="" ``the="" effect="" of="" sorbitol-="" containing="" chewing="" gum="" on="" the="" incidence="" of="" dental="" caries,="" plaque="" and="" gingivitis,''="" community="" dental="" and="" oral="" epidemiology,="" 1:58-67,="" 1973.="" 21.="" banozcy,="" j.,="" e.="" hadas,="" i.="" esztary,="" i.="" marosi,="" and="" j.="" nemes,="" ``three-year="" results="" with="" sorbitol="" in="" clinical="" longitudinal="" experiments,''="" journal="" of="" the="" international="" association="" of="" dentistry="" in="" children,="" 12:59-63,="" 1981.="" 22.="" kandelman,="" d.,="" and="" g.="" gagnon,="" ``clinical="" results="" after="" 12="" months="" from="" a="" study="" of="" the="" incidence="" and="" progression="" of="" dental="" caries="" in="" relation="" to="" consumption="" of="" chewing-gum="" containing="" xylitol="" in="" school="" preventive="" programs,''="" journal="" of="" dental="" research,="" 66:1407-1411,="" 1987.="" 23.="" rekola,="" m.,="" ``changes="" in="" buccal="" white="" spots="" during="" two-year="" total="" substitution="" of="" dietary="" sucrose="" with="" xylitol,''="" acta="" odontologica="" scandinavica,="" 44:285-290,="" 1986.="" 24.="" makinen,="" k.="" k.,="" and="" a.="" scheinin,="" ``turku="" sugar="" studies.="" vi.="" the="" administration="" of="" the="" trial="" and="" the="" control="" of="" the="" dietary="" regimen,''="" acta="" odontologica="" scandanavia,="" 33:105-127,="" 1975.="" 25.="" rekola,="" m.,="" ``approximal="" caries="" development="" during="" 2-year="" total="" substitution="" of="" dietary="" sucrose="" with="" xylitol,''="" caries="" research,="" 21:87-="" 94,="" 1987.="" 26.="" scheinin,="" a.,="" j.="" banoczy,="" j.="" szoke,="" i.="" esztari,="" k.="" pienihakkinen,="" u.="" scheinin,="" j.="" tiekso,="" p.="" zimmerman,="" and="" e.="" hadas,="" ``collaborative="" who="" xylitol="" [[page="" 37528]]="" field="" studies="" in="" hungary.="" i.="" three-year="" caries="" activity="" in="" institutionalized="" children,''="" acta="" odontologica="" scandinavica,="" 43:327-="" 347,="" 1985.="" 27.="" banoczy,="" j.,="" a.="" scheinin,="" r.="" pados,="" g.="" ember,="" p.="" kertesz,="" and="" k.="" pienihakkinen,="" ``collaborative="" who="" xylitol="" field="" studies="" in="" hungary.="" ii.="" general="" background="" and="" control="" of="" the="" dietary="" regimen,''="" acta="" odontologica="" scandinavica,="" 43:349-357,="" 1985.="" 28.="" scheinin,="" a.,="" k.="" pienihakkinen,="" j.="" tiekso,="" j.="" banoczy,="" j.="" szoke,="" i.="" esztari,="" p.="" zimmerman,="" and="" e.="" hadas,="" ``collaborative="" who="" xylitol="" field="" studies="" in="" hungary.="" vii.="" two-year="" caries="" incidence="" in="" 976="" institutionalized="" children,''="" acta="" odontologica="" scandinavica,="" 43:381-="" 387,="" 1985.="" 29.="" barmes,="" d.,="" j.="" barnaud,="" s.="" khambonanda,="" and="" j.="" sardo="" infirri,="" ``field="" trials="" of="" preventive="" regimes="" in="" thailand="" and="" french="" polynesia,''="" international="" dental="" journal,="" 35:66-72,="" 1985.="" 30.="" kandelman,="" d.,="" a.="" bar,="" and="" a.="" hefti,="" ``collaborative="" who="" xylitol="" field="" study="" in="" french="" polynesia.="" i.="" baseline="" prevalence="" and="" 32-="" month="" caries="" increment,''="" caries="" research,="" 22:1-10,="" 1988.="" 31.="" frostell,="" g.,="" l.="" blomlof,="" i.="" blomqvist,="" g.="" m.="" dahl,="" s.="" edward,="" a.="" fjellstrom,="" c.="" o.="" henrikson,="" o.="" larje,="" c.="" e.="" nord,="" and="" k.="" j.="" nordenvall,="" ``substitution="" of="" sucrose="" by=""> in candy. 
    `The Roslagen study','' Acta Odontologica Scandinavica, 32:235-253, 
    1974.
        32. Glass, R. L., ``A two year clinical trial of sorbitol gum,'' 
    Caries Research, 17:365-368, 1983.
        33. Ikeda, T., K. Ochiai, Y. Doi, T. Mukasa, and S. Yagi, 
    ``Maltitol and SE58 in rats and decalcification as human intraoral 
    substrate, Nihon University Journal of Oral Science, 25:1-5, 1975.
        34. Yagi, S., ``Effects of maltitol on insoluble glucan synthesis 
    by S. mutans and change of enamel hardness,'' Nihon University Journal 
    of Oral Science, 4:136-144, 1978.
        35. Leach, S. A., G. T. R. Lee, and W. M. Edgar, ``Remineralization 
    of artificial caries-like lesions in human enamel in situ by chewing 
    sorbitol gum,'' Journal of Dental Research, 68:1064-1068, 1989.
        36. Rundegren, J., T. Koulourides, and T. Ericson, ``Contribution 
    of maltitol and Lycasin to experimental enamel demineralized 
    in the human mouth,'' Caries Research, 14:67-74, 1980.
        37. Creanor, S. L., R. Strang, W. H. Gilmour, R. H. Foye, J. Brown, 
    D. A. M. Geddes, and A. F. Hall, ``The effect of chewing gum use on in 
    situ enamel lesion remineralization,'' Journal of Dental Research, 
    71:1895-1900, 1992.
        38. Bibby, B. G., and J. Fu, ``Changes in plaque pH in vitro by 
    sweeteners,'' Journal of Dental Research, 64:1130-1133, 1985.
        39. Birkhed, D., and S. Edwardsson, ``Acid production from sucrose 
    substitutes in human dental plaque,'' Proceedings of ERGOB Conference, 
    pp. 211-217, 1978.
        40. Birkhed, D., S. Edwardsson, B. Svensson, F. Moskovitz, and G. 
    Frostell, ``Acid production from sorbitol in human dental plaque,'' 
    Archives of Oral Biology, 23:971-975, 1978.
        41. Birkhed, D., S. Edwardsson, M. L. Ahlden, and G. Frostell, 
    ``Effects of 3 mo frequent consumption of hydrogenated starch 
    hydrolysate (Lycasin), maltitol, sorbitol and xylitol on human dental 
    plaque,'' Acta Odontologica Scandinavica, 37:103-115, 1979.
        42. Frostell, G., ``Dental plaque pH in relation to intake of 
    carbohydrate products,'' Acta Odontologica Scandanavia, 27:3-29, 1969.
        43. Toors, F. A., and J. I. B. Herczog, ``Acid production from a 
    nonsugar licorice and different sugar substitutes in Streptococcus 
    mutans monoculture and pooled plaque-saliva mixtures,'' Caries 
    Research, 12:60-68, 1978.
        44. Gallagher, I. H., and S. J. Fussell, ``Acidogenic fermentation 
    of pentose alcohols by human dental plaque microorganisms,'' Archives 
    of Oral Biology, 24:673-679, 1979.
        45. Gehring, F., and H. D. Hufnagel, ``Intra- and extraoral pH 
    measurements on human dental plaque after rinsing with some sugar and 
    sucrose substitute solutions,'' Oralprophylaxe, 5:13-19, 1983.
        46. Havenaar, R., J. H. J. Huis In't Veld, O. Backer Dirks, and J. 
    D. de Stoppelaar, ``Some bacteriological aspects of sugar 
    substitutes,'' Proceedings from ERGOB Conference, pp. 192-196, 1978.
        47. Jensen, M. E., ``Human plaque acidogenicity studies with 
    hydrogenated starch hydrolysates,'' unpublished.
        48. Maki, Y., K. Ohta, I. Takazoe, Y. Matsukubo, Y. Takaesu, V. 
    Topitsoglou, and G. Frostell, ``Acid production from isomaltulose, 
    sucrose, sorbitol, xylitol in suspensions of human dental plaque,'' 
    Caries Research, 17:335-339, 1983.
        49. Park, K. K., B. R. Schemehorn, J. W. Bolton, and G. K. Stookey, 
    ``Comparative effect of sorbitol and xylitol mints on plaque 
    acidogenicity,'' presented at the International Association for Dental 
    Research, April 17-21, 1991.
        50. Soderling, E., K. K. Makinen, C.-Y. Chen, H. R. Pape, and P.-L. 
    Makinen, ``Effect of sorbitol, xylitol and xylitol/sorbitol gums on 
    dental plaque,'' Caries Research, 23:378-384, 1989.
        51. Birkhed, D., and G. Skude, ``Relation of amylase to starch and 
    Lycasin metabolism in human dental plaque in vitro,'' 
    Scandinavian Journal of Dental Research, 86:248-258, 1978.
        52. Havenaar, R., J. S. Drost, J. D. de Stoppelaar, J. H. J. Huis 
    in't Veld, and O. Backer Dirks, ``Potential cariogenicity of Lycasin 
    80/55 in comparison to starch, sucrose, xylitol, sorbitol and L-sorbose 
    in rats,'' Caries Research, 18:375-384, 1984.
        53. Havenaar, R., J. S. Drost, J. H. J. Huis in't Veld, O. Backer 
    Dirks, and J. D. de Stoppelaar,, ``Potential cariogenicity of Lycasin 
    80/55 before and after repeated transmissions of the dental plaque 
    flora in rats,'' Archives of Oral Biology, 29:993-999, 1984.
        54. Havenaar, R., J. H. J. Huis In't Veld, J. D. de Stoppelaar, and 
    O. Backer Dirks, ``A purified cariogenic diet for rats to test sugar 
    substitutes with special emphasis on general health,'' Caries Research, 
    17:340-352, 1983.
        55. Havenaar, R., J. D. Huis in't Veld, J. D. J. de Stoppelaar, and 
    O. B. Dirks, ``Anti-cariogenic and remineralizing properties of xylitol 
    in combination with sucrose in rats inoculated with Streptococcus 
    mutans,'' Caries Research, 18:269-277, 1984.
        56. Grenby, T. H., and J. Colley, ``Dental effects of xylitol 
    compared with other carbohydrates and polyols in the diet of laboratory 
    rats,'' Archives of Oral Biology, 28:745-758, 1983.
        57. Karle, E. J., and F. Gehring, ``Kariogenitatsuntersuchungen von 
    zuckeraustauschstoffen an xerostomierlen ratten. (Studies on the 
    cariogenesis of sugar substitutes in xerostomized rats),'' Deutsche 
    Zahnarztliche Zeitschrift, 34:551-554, 1979.
        58. Muhlemann, H. R., R. Schmid, T. Noguchi, T. Imfeld, and R. S. 
    Hirsch, ``Some dental effects of xylitol under laboratory and in vivo 
    conditions,'' Caries Research, 11:263-276, 1977.
        59. Shyu, K.-W., and M.-Y Hsu, ``The cariogenicity of xylitol, 
    mannitol, sorbitol and sucrose,'' Proceedings of the National Science 
    Council ROC, 4:21-26, 1980.
        60. Bramstedt, F., F. Gehring, and E. J. Karle, ``Comparative study 
    of the cariogenic effects of Palatinit, xylitol and 
    saccharose in animals,'' unpublished, 1976.
        61. Izumiya, A., T. Ohshima, and S. Sofue, ``Caries inducibility of 
    various sweeteners,'' Academy of Pedodontia, p. 65, May 1984.
        62. Gehring, F., and E. J. Karle, ``The sugar substitute 
    Palatinit with special emphasis on microbiological and 
    caries-preventing aspects,'' Zeitschrift Ernahrungswiss, 20:96-106, 
    1981. 
    
    [[Page 37529]]
    
        63. Karle, E. J., and F. Gehring, ``Palatinit-A New Sugar 
    Substitute and its Carioprophylactic Assessment,'' Deutsche 
    Zalnarztliche Zeitschrift 33:189-191, 1978.
        64. Larje, O., and R. H. Larson, ``Reduction of dental caries in 
    rats by intermittent feeding with sucrose substitutes, Archives of Oral 
    Biology, 15:805-816, 1970.
        65. Muhlemann, H. R., ``Effect of topical application of sugar 
    substitutes on bacterial agglomerate formation, caries incidence and 
    solution rates of molars in the rat,'' unpublished, 1978.
        66. Ooshima, T., A. Izumitani, T. Minami, T. Yoshida, S. Sobue, T. 
    Fujiwari, and S. Hamada, ``Non-cariogenicity of maltitol in SPF rats 
    infected with mutans streptococci,'' submitted for publication.
        67. Tate, N., S. Wada, H. Tani, and K. Oikawa, ``Experimental 
    studies on correlations between progressive caries and sugar intake,'' 
    unpublished.
        68. Leach, S. A., and R. M. Green, ``Effect of xylitol-supplemented 
    diets on the progression and regression of fissure caries in the albino 
    rat,'' Caries Research, 14:16-23, 1980.
        69. Mukasa, T., ``The possibility of maltitol and SE 58 as non-
    cariogenic sweeteners: their utilization by Streptococcus mutans for 
    insoluble glucan synthesis and experimental dental caries in rats,'' 
    Nihon University Journal of Oral Science, 3:266-275, 1977.
        70. Hoeven, J. S. van der, ``Cariogenicity of disaccharide alcohols 
    in rats,'' Caries Research, 14:61-66, 1980.
        71. Burt, B. A., and A. I. Ismail, ``Diet, nutrition, and food 
    cariogenicity,'' Journal of Dental Research, 65 (Special Issue): 1475-
    1484, 1986.
        72. National Research Council, National Academy of Sciences, ``Diet 
    and Health,'' National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 1989.
        73. Hoeven, J.S. van der, ``Carigenicity of lactitol in program-fed 
    rats,'' Caries Research, 20:441-443, 1986.
        74. Imfeld, T., and H. R. Muhlemann, ``Cariogenicity and 
    acidogenicity of food, confectionery and beverages,'' Pharmacology and 
    Therapeutic Dentistry, 3:53-68, 1978.
        75. Imfeld, T., ``Identification of Low Caries Risk Dietary 
    Components,'' Monographs in Oral Science, vol. 11, Karger, Basel, 
    Switzerland, pp. 1-8 and 117-144, 1983.
        76. Grenby, T. H., A. Phillips, and M. Mistry, ``Studies of the 
    dental properties of lactitol compared with five other bulk sweeteners 
    in vitro,'' Caries Research, 23:315-319, 1989.
        77. Grenby, T. H., and A. Phillips, ``Dental and metabolic effects 
    of lactitol in the diet of laboratory rats,'' British Journal of 
    Nutrition, 61:17-24, 1989.
        78. Edgar, W. M., and D. A. M. Geddes, ``Plaque acidity models for 
    cariogenicity testing--some theoretical and practical observations,'' 
    Journal of Dental Research, 65 (Special Issue): 1498-1502, 1986.
        79. Birkhed, D., S. Kalfas, G. Svensater, and S. Edwardsson, 
    ``Microbiological aspects of some caloric sugar substitutes,'' 
    International Dental Journal, 35:9-17, 1985.
        80. Schrotenboer, G. H., ``In the Matter of Revising the Regulation 
    for Foods for Special Dietary Uses,'' Docket No. FDC-78, March 4, 1970 
    at 6-7.
        81. Saltsman, Joyce J., CFSAN, FDA, Memorandum to file--
    Environmental Assessment of Health Claim Petition, December 23, 1994.
        82. Ayers, C. S., and R. A. Abrams, ``Noncariogenic sweeteners, 
    sugar substitutes for caries control,'' Dental Hygiene, April, 162-
    167:1987.
        83. Rugg-Gunn, A. J., and W. M. Edgar, ``Sweeteners and dental 
    health,'' Community Dental Health, 2:213-223, 1985.
        84. Grenby, T. H., ``Nutritive sucrose substitutes and dental 
    health,'' In: Developments in Sweeteners, editors: T. H. Grenby, K. J. 
    Parker, and M. G. Lindley, Elsevier Science, Inc., 2:51-88, 1983.
        85. Rugg-Gunn, A. J., ``Lycasin and the prevention of 
    dental caries,'' In: Progress in Sweeteners, editor: T. H. Grenby, 
    Elsevier Science, Inc., pp. 311-328, 1989.
        86. Loesche, W. J., ``The rationale for caries prevention through 
    use of sugar substitutes,'' International Dental Journal, 35:1-8, 1985.
        87. Mandel, I. D., ``Dental caries,'' American Scientist, 67:680-
    688, 1979.
        88. Koulourides, T., R. Bodden, S. Keller, L. Manson-Hing, J. 
    Lastra, and T. Housch, ``Cariogenicity of nine sugars tested with an 
    intraoral device in man,'' Caries Research 10:427-441, 1976.
        89. Baer, A., ``Significance and promotion of sugar substitution 
    for the prevention of dental caries,'' Lben.-Wiss U. Technology, 
    Academic Press, 22:46-53, 1989.
        90. LSRO, FASEB ``Health Aspect of Sugar Alcohols and Lactose,'' 
    Bethesda, MD, December 1986.
        91. Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives, ``Evaluation 
    of Certain Food Additives and Contaminants,'' Geneva, Switzerland, pp. 
    16-17, 1993.
    
    List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 101
    
        Food labeling, Nutrition, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
    
        Therefore, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under 
    authority delegated to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs, it is 
    proposed that 21 CFR part 101 be amended as follows:
    
    PART 101--FOOD LABELING
    
        1. The authority citation for 21 CFR part 101 is revised to read as 
    follows:
    
        Authority: Secs. 4, 5, 6 of the Fair Packaging and Labeling Act 
    (15 U.S.C. 1453, 1454, 1455); secs. 201, 301, 402, 403, 409, 701 of 
    the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 321, 331, 342, 
    343, 348, 371).
    
        2. New Sec. 101.80 is added to subpart E to read as follows:
    Sec. 101.80  Health claims: dietary sugar alcohols and dental caries.
    
        (a) Relationship between dietary sugar alcohols and dental caries. 
    (1) Dental caries, or tooth decay, is a disease caused by many factors. 
    Both environmental and genetic factors can affect the development of 
    dental caries. Risk factors include tooth enamel crystal structure and 
    mineral content, plaque quantity and quality, saliva quantity and 
    quality, individual immune response, types and physical characteristics 
    of foods consumed, eating behaviors, presence of acid producing oral 
    bacteria, and cultural influences.
        (2) The relationship between dietary sugars consumption and tooth 
    decay is well established. Sucrose is one of the most, but not the 
    only, cariogenic sugar in the diet. Bacteria found in the mouth are 
    able to metabolize sugars producing acid and forming dental plaque. 
    Prolonged exposure of the tooth enamel to acids from dental plaque 
    causes tooth enamel to demineralize, or decay. Frequent between-meal 
    consumption of sugary foods, particularly foods that easily stick to 
    the teeth, can cause tooth decay.
        (3) U.S. diets tend to be high in sugars consumption. Although 
    there has been a decline in the prevalence of dental caries in the 
    United States, per capita consumption of sugars has not declined, and 
    the disease remains widespread throughout the population. Federal 
    government agencies and nationally recognized health professional 
    organizations recommend decreased consumption of sugars.
        (4) Dietary sugar alcohols can be used to replace dietary sugars in 
    food. Sugar alcohols are significantly less cariogenic than dietary 
    sugars. Thus, replacing dietary sugars with sugar alcohols helps to 
    maintain dental health.
        (b) Significance of the relationship between sugar alcohols and 
    dental caries. Sugar alcohols do not promote 
    
    [[Page 37530]]
    dental caries because they are slowly metabolized by bacteria to form 
    some acid. The rate and amount of acid production is significantly less 
    than that from sucrose and does not cause the loss of important 
    minerals from tooth enamel.
        (c) Requirements. (1) All requirements set forth in Sec. 101.14 
    shall be met, except that sugar alcohol-containing foods are exempt 
    from section Sec. 101.14(e)(6).
        (2) Specific requirements. (i) Nature of the claim. A health claim 
    relating sugar alcohols and the nonpromotion of dental caries may be 
    made on the label or labeling of a food described in (c)(2)(ii) of this 
    section, provided that:
        (A) The claim shall state ``does not promote,'' ``useful in not 
    promoting,'' or ``expressly for not promoting'' dental caries.
        (B) In specifying the disease, the claim uses the following terms: 
    ``dental caries'' or ``tooth decay.''
        (C) For packages with a total surface area available for labeling 
    of 15 or more square inches, the claim shall indicate that dental 
    caries depends on many factors.
        (D) Packages with a total surface area available for labeling of 
    less than 15 square inches are exempt from paragraph (C) of this 
    section.
        (E) The claim shall not attribute any degree of nonpromotion of 
    dental caries to the use of the sugar alcohol-containing food.
        (ii) Nature of the food. (A) The food shall meet the requirement in 
    Sec. 101.60(c)(1)(i) with respect to sugars content.
        (B) The sugar alcohol in the food shall be xylitol, sorbitol, 
    mannitol, maltitol, isomalt, lactitol, hydrogenated starch 
    hydrolysates, hydrogenated glucose syrups, or a combination of these.
        (C) The sugar alcohol-containing food shall not lower plaque pH 
    below 5.7 by bacterial fermentation either during consumption or up to 
    30 minutes after consumption, as measured by in vivo tests.
        (d) Optional information. (1) The claim may include information 
    from paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section, which describe the 
    relationship between diets containing sugar alcohols and dental caries.
        (2) In referring to sucrose, the claim may use the term ``sucrose'' 
    or ``sugar.''
        (3) The claim may identify one or more of the following risk 
    factors for dental caries: Frequent consumption of sucrose or other 
    fermentable carbohydrates; presence of oral bacteria capable of 
    fermenting sugars; length of time sugars are in contact with the teeth; 
    lack of exposure to fluoride; individual susceptibility; socioeconomic 
    and cultural factors; and characteristics of tooth enamel, saliva, and 
    plaque.
        (e) Model health claim. The following model health claims may be 
    used in food labeling to describe the relationship between sugar 
    alcohol and dental caries.
        (1) For packages with total surface area available for labeling of 
    less than 15 square inches:
        (i) Useful only in not promoting tooth decay;
        (ii) Does not promote tooth decay; and
        (iii) [This product] does not promote tooth decay.
        (2) For packages with total surface area available for labeling of 
    15 or more square inches:
        (i) Tooth decay is a disease caused by many factors including 
    frequent between meal consumption of sugary foods. [Name of sugar 
    alcohol] does not promote tooth decay.
        (ii) [Reserved].
    
        Dated: July 7, 1995.
    William B. Schultz,
    Deputy Commissioner for Policy.
    
        Note: The following tables will not appear in the annual Code of 
    Federal Regulations.
    
    BILLING CODE 4160-01-P
    
    [[Page 37531]]
    [GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TP20JY95.000
    
    
    
    [[Page 37532]]
    [GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TP20JY95.001
    
    
    
    [[Page 37533]]
    [GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TP20JY95.002
    
    
    
    [[Page 37534]]
    [GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TP20JY95.003
    
    
    
    [[Page 37535]]
    [GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TP20JY95.004
    
    
    
    [[Page 37536]]
    [GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TP20JY95.005
    
    
    
    [[Page 37537]]
    [GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TP20JY95.006
    
    
    
    [[Page 37538]]
    [GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TP20JY95.007
    
    
    
    [[Page 37539]]
    [GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TP20JY95.008
    
    
    
    [[Page 37540]]
    [GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TP20JY95.009
    
    
    
    [[Page 37541]]
    [GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TP20JY95.010
    
    
    
    [[Page 37542]]
    [GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TP20JY95.011
    
    
    
    [[Page 37543]]
    [GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TP20JY95.012
    
    
    
    [[Page 37544]]
    [GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TP20JY95.013
    
    
    
    [[Page 37545]]
    [GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TP20JY95.014
    
    
    
    [[Page 37546]]
    [GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TP20JY95.015
    
    
    
    [[Page 37547]]
    [GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TP20JY95.016
    
    
    
    [[Page 37548]]
    [GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TP20JY95.017
    
    
    
    [[Page 37549]]
    [GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TP20JY95.018
    
    
    
    [FR Doc. 95-17505 Filed 7-19-95; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4160-01-C
    
    

Document Information

Published:
07/20/1995
Department:
Food and Drug Administration
Entry Type:
Proposed Rule
Action:
Proposed rule.
Document Number:
95-17505
Dates:
Written comments by October 3, 1995. The agency is proposing that any final rule that may issue based upon this proposal become effective 30 days following its publication.
Pages:
37507-37549 (43 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 95P-0003
PDF File:
95-17505.pdf
CFR: (19)
21 CFR 101.80(b)
21 CFR 101.14(b)(3)(ii)
21 CFR 101.80(c)(1)
21 CFR 101.14(c)
21 CFR 101.60(c)
More ...