[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 139 (Monday, July 21, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 39052-39055]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-19115]
[[Page 39052]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Office of the Comptroller of the Currency
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION
Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission of OMB
Review; Comment Request
AGENCY: Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), Treasury;
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Board); and Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC).
ACTION: Notice of information collection to be submitted to the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: On November 4, 1996, the OCC, the Board, and the FDIC (the
agencies) requested public comment for 60 days on a proposed change in
the method by which banks file their quarterly Reports of Condition and
Income (Call Reports), which are currently approved collections of
information. Under that proposal, the agencies would no longer accept
Call Reports that banks file directly with the agencies in hard copy
(paper) form. Instead, the only Call Reports that the agencies would
accept would be those filed electronically or on computer diskette with
the agencies' electronic collection agent. A bank could either file its
reports directly with the agent or contract with another party for the
conversion of its reports from hard copy (paper) to automated form and
the filing of the reports with the agent. After considering the
comments the agencies received, the Federal Financial Institutions
Examination Council (FFIEC), of which the agencies are members, adopted
certain modifications to the proposed change in filing method.
In accordance with the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (44 U.S.C. chapter 35), the agencies may not conduct or
sponsor, and the respondent is not required to respond to, an
information collection that has been extended, revised, or implemented
on or after October 1, 1995, unless it displays a currently valid OMB
control number. Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed
revisions to the following collections of information are necessary for
the proper performance of the agencies's functions, including whether
the information has practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agencies' estimates of the burden of the information collections as
they are proposed to be revised, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (c) ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; (d) ways to
minimize the burden of information collection on respondents, including
through the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of
information technology; and (e) estimates of capital or startup costs
and costs of operational, maintenance, and purchase of services to
provide information.
DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before August 20, 1997.
ADDRESSES: Interested parties are invited to submit written comments to
any or all of the agencies. All comments, which should refer to the OMB
control number(s), will be shared among the agencies.
OCC: Written comments should be submitted to the Communications
Division, Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, 250 E Street,
S.W., Third Floor, Washington, D.C. 20219; Attention: OMB Control No.
1557-0081 (FAX number (202) 874-5274; Internet address:
Regs.comments@occ.treas.gov). Comments will be available for inspection
and photocopying at the OCC's Public Reference Room, 250 E Street,
S.W., Washington, D.C. 20219, between 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. on
business days. Appointments for inspection of comments can be made by
calling (202) 874-5043.
Board: Written comments should be addressed to Mr. William W.
Wiles, Secretary, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System,
20th and C Streets, N.W., Washington, D.C.20551, Attention: OMB Control
No. 7100-0036, or delivered to the Board's mail room between 8:45 a.m.
and 5:15 p.m., and to the security control room outside of those hours.
Both the mail room and the security control room are accessible from
the courtyard entrance on 20th Street between Constitution Avenue and C
Street, N.W. Comments received may be inspected in room M-P-500 between
9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., except as provided in section 261.8 of the
Board's Rules regarding Availability of Information, 12 CFR 261.8(a).
FDIC: Written comments should be sent to Robert E. Feldman,
Executive Secretary, Attention: Comments/OES, Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation, 550 17th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20429, Attention:
OMB Control No. 3064-0052. Comments may be hand-delivered to the guard
station at the rear of the 550 17th Street Building (located on F
Street) on business days between 7:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. (Fax number:
202) 898-3838; Internet address: comments@fdic.gov). Comments may be
inspected and photocopied in the FDIC Public Information Center, Room
100, 801 17th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20429, between 9:00 a.m.
and 4:30 p.m. on business days.
A copy of the comments may also be submitted to the OMB desk
officer for the agencies: Alexander Hunt, Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, New Executive
Office Building, Room 3208, Washington, D.C. 20503.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A copy of an agency's submission to
OMB for review and approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
may be requested from the agency clearance officer whose name appears
below.
OCC: John Ference, OCC Clearance Officer, or Jessie Gates (202)
874-5090, Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, 250 E Street,
S.W., Washington, D.C. 20219.
Board: Mary M. McLaughlin, Board Clearance Officer, (202) 452-3829,
Division of Research and Statistics, Board of Governors of the Federal
Reserve System, 20th and C Streets, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20551.
Telecommunications Device for the Deaf (TDD) users only, Diane Jenkins,
(202) 452-3544, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, 20th
and C Streets, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20551.
FDIC: Steven F. Hanft, FDIC Clearance Officer, (202) 898-3907,
Office of the Executive Secretary, Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation, 550 17th Street N.W., Washington, D.C. 20429.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Request for OMB approval to extend, with a
revision to the filing method, the following currently approved
collections of information:
Report Title: Consolidated Reports of Condition and Income (Call
Report).
Form Number: FFIEC 031, 032, 033, 034.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The FFIEC 031 report form is filed by banks with domestic
and foreign offices. The FFIEC 032 report form is filed by banks
with domestic offices only and total assets of $300 million or more.
The FFIEC 033 report form is filed by banks with domestic offices
only and total assets of $100 million or more but less than $300
million. The FFIEC 034 report form is filed by banks with domestic
offices only and total assets of less than $100 million.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Frequency of Response: Quarterly.
For OCC
OMB Number: 1557-0081.
Affected Public: National Banks.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 2,800 national banks.
Estimated Time per Response: 39.92 burden hours.
[[Page 39053]]
Estimated Total Annual Burden: 447,132 burden hours.
For Board
OMB Number: 7100-0036.
Affected Public: State Member Banks.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 1,002 state member banks.
Estimated Time per Response: 45.80 burden hours.
Estimated Total Annual Burden: 183,566 burden hours.
For FDIC
OMB Number: 3064-0052.
Affected Public: Insured State Nonmember Commercial and Savings
Banks.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 6,374 insured state nonmember
banks.
Estimated Time per Response: 29.67 burden hours.
Estimated Total Annual Burden: 756,511 burden hours.
The estimated time per response is an average which varies by
agency because of differences in the composition of the banks under
each agency's supervision (e.g., size distribution of banks, types of
activities in which they are engaged, and number of banks with foreign
offices). The time per response for a bank is estimated to range from
15 to 400 hours, depending on individual circumstances.
General Description of Report: This information collection is
mandatory: 12 U.S.C. 161 (for national banks), 12 U.S.C. 324 (for state
member banks), and 12 U.S.C. 1817 (for insured state nonmember
commercial and savings banks). Except for select sensitive items, this
information collection is not given confidential treatment. Small
businesses (i.e., small banks) are affected.
Abstract: Call Reports are filed quarterly with the agencies for
their use in monitoring the condition and performance of reporting
banks and the industry as a whole. Call Reports also are used to
calculate banks' deposit insurance and Financing Corporation
assessments and for monetary policy and other public policy purposes.
Current Actions: Under the auspices of the FFIEC, the agencies
originally proposed that they would no longer accept Call Reports filed
directly with them in hard copy (paper) form. The agencies proposed
that the only Call Reports that they would accept would be those that
are filed electronically or on computer diskette with the agencies'
electronic collection agent, Electronic Data systems Corporation (EDS).
A bank could either file its reports electronically or on computer
diskette directly with EDS or arrange for a third party to convert its
reports from hard copy (paper) form to automated form and then file
them with EDS. The agencies proposed to phase out their acceptance of
paper Call Report forms as of the June 30, September 30, And December
31, 1997, report dates based on bank size. After considering the
comments, the FFIEC approved certain modifications to the proposed
change in filing method for Call Reports. The comments on the initial
proposal and the changes made in response thereto are discussed below.
Type of Review: Revision.
On November 4, 1996, the agencies jointly published a notice
soliciting comment for 60 days on a proposal to no longer accept Call
Reports filed directly with them in paper form (61 FR 56737). The
notice described the change in filing method that the agencies, with
the approval of the FFIEC, were proposing to implement in three phases
for their currently approved Call Report information collections.
beginning with the reports for June 30, 1997.
In response to this notice, the agencies collectively received 24
comment letters, 17 from small banking organizations and 7 from trade
groups, including the American Bankers Association (ABA), America's
Community Bankers (ACB), the Independent Bankers Association of America
(IBAA), and 4 state bankers associations (Illinois, Missouri, and 2 in
Wisconsin).
All but three of the bank commenters opposed the proposal. The one
bank that supported the proposal (Which has $125 million in assets)
indicated that it already purchases and uses Call Report preparation
software, is satisfied with its ease of use, and would not be unduly
burdened by having to file electronically. Two other banks (with $70
and $30 million in assets) requested only that the implementation dates
be delayed to give them more time to prepare for the change in filing
method. The remaining banking organizations objected to the proposal
because of the cost of purchasing Call Report preparation software, the
time to learn how to use the software, and similar expense-related
reasons. However, none of these bankers' comments acknowledged that the
proposal contained an alternative which would not require them to
purchase Call Report software, i.e, the agencies stated in the proposal
that individual banks would be permitted to continue completing their
reports on paper, provided that such a bank arranged for a third party,
such as one of the Call Report software vendors, to convert the bank
data from paper to electronic form.
Of the trade groups, ACB supported the proposal, noting that the
Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS) already requires savings
associations to file their Thrift Financial Reports electronically
(although OTS provides the necessary software directly to each savings
association). The ABA stated that it no longer opposes mandatory
electronic submission of Call Reports. In this regard, the ABA
indicated that several of the bankers they consulted about the proposal
``have reported that by switching to Call Report software they have
decreased the amount of time their cashiers and other bank personnel
spend on preparing the Call Report. As a result, they believe that the
benefits that they have obtained by using the software have outweighed
the initial costs and annual fees for maintaining the software.''
However, the ABA recommended that the FFIEC and the agencies should
streamline the Call Report before making electronic filing mandatory.
The ABA also stated that bankers were concerned that the agencies would
find it easier to make unnecessary changes and add unnecessary items to
the Call Report if the report had to be filed electronically. The IBAA
stated that ``[t]he majority of community banks providing comments to
the IBAA do not foresee any problems complying with'' an electronic
filing requirement. The IBAA added that ``in the long run filing
electronically should make the Call Report preparation and banking
agencies' review processes more efficient and less burdensome for
banks.'' The IBAA noted, however, that some community banks strongly
believe the benefits do not outweigh the costs. The IBAA urged the
agencies to explore ways to reduce the cost of the proposal to banks
not currently filing electronically.
The concerns raised by the state bankers associations were similar
to those of other commenters, although the Illinois Bankers Association
stated that ``paperwork for this quarterly report requirement * * *
will be reduced with electronic filing'' and that ``the banking
industry supports this proposal.'' Concerns expressed by these trade
groups (including the Illinois Bankers Association) generally dealt
with the costs that will be incurred by some banks, training on the use
of Call Report software, and the amount of lead time until the
effective date.
In developing the proposed change in filing method for Call
Reports, the FFIEC and the agencies recognized that some banks,
especially smaller banks with limited experience with personal
computers, would be concerned about the costs associated with
purchasing
[[Page 39054]]
computer software \2\ and filing their reports electronically or on
computer diskette with EDS, the agencies' collection agent. Thus, the
proposal stated that the agencies would permit banks to continue
completing their reports on paper. However, a bank preferring to take
this approach would need to arrange for a third party to convert its
completed Call Report from paper to electronic form. The proposal
indicated that banks could contract with a Call Report software vendor
or some other party for this data conversion. Despite the proposal's
inclusion of this alternative, few of the commenters who objected to
the proposed requirement that bank Call Reports be filed with EDS in an
automated from acknowledged that the proposal contained the paper-based
alternative which would enable them to file indirectly with EDS and
avoid incurring Call Report software and other computer-related costs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ Call Report preparation software is available from:
DBI Financial Systems, Inc., P.O. Box 1249, Cannon Beach, Oregon
97110, Telephone: (800) 774-3279.
DPSC Software, Inc., 23501 Park Sorrento, Suite 105, Calabasas,
California 91302, Telephone: (800) 825-3772.
Information Technology, Inc., 1345 Old Cheney Road, Lincoln,
Nebraska 68512, Telephone: (402) 423-2682.
Sheshunoff Information Services Inc., P.O. Box 13203 Capitol
Station, Austin, Texas 78711-3203, Telephone: (800) 505-8333.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The FFIEC and the agencies continue to be cognizant of the cost
considerations raised by several of the commenters. Nevertheless, the
agencies believe that, after the initial adjustment period, the
benefits to bankers from using Call Report software to prepare their
reports compare favorably with the costs. This view is consistent with
the previously cited comments by the ABA and IBAA. However,
notwithstanding the benefits to both banks and the agencies from the
use of Call Report software (discussed below), the agencies are
retaining the paper-based filing alternative that they had proposed.
Furthermore, to make it simpler for those banks choosing to prepare
their reports in paper form, the FFIEC and the agencies will permit
banks to contract directly from EDS, the agencies' electronic
collection agent, to convert their paper reports to automated form.
Banks may also contract with any other party (such as Call Report
software vendor) for the conversation and electronic filing of their
reports as originally proposed. When one of these parties converts a
bank's data to automated form by keypunching or some other means, the
bank would continue to be responsible for the accuracy of the data in
its report. In addition, banks must ensure that EDS receives their
completed Call Reports in automated form not later than 30 days after
the Call Report date in accordance with existing Call Report submission
standards.
With respect to the benefits of Call Report software and electronic
filing, the agencies have provided the software companies with a
significant number of edits that the agencies normally use for
validating the Call Report information submitted to them each quarter.
As a result, while each bank is responsible for the quality of its Call
Report data, a bank using a commercial software package can correct
errors identified by the software package prior to filing the Call
Report, and provide better quality data to the agencies. This procedure
saves a bank time by reducing agency inquiries for data correction
after the Call Report has been filed. The commercial software also
provides immediate confirmation to a bank that files electronically
that EDS has received its Call Report. In addition, electronic
submission translates into lower costs for the agencies and for the
insurance funds administered by the FDIC. Thus, because the use of Call
Report software and the electronic submission of reports promotes the
accuracy of and speeds the receipt and processing of Call Reports data,
the FFIEC and the agencies may in the future propose to discontinue or
otherwise modify the paper-based filing alternative.
As proposed, the agencies would have required banks with assets of
$50 million or more as of June 30, 1996, to file, or arrange for a
third party to file, their Call Reports electronically or on computer
diskette with EDS beginning with the reports for June 30, 1997. The
requirement would have applied to banks with assets of $25 million or
more beginning as of the September 30, 1997, report date. For all other
banks, the requirement was scheduled to take effect with the reports
for December 31, 1997. In response to requests from commenters for
additional time to prepare for this change in filing method, the FFIEC
has decided to adjust the implementation schedule. Accordingly, the
revised timetable is as follows:
For banks with assets of $50 million or more, the
requirement would not take effect as of the September 30, 1997, report
date.
For all other banks, the requirements would take effect as
of the December 31, 1997, report date.
The FFIEC believes it is appropriate to fully implement the change
in filing method during the final two quarters of the 1997 reporting
year when no other changes to the Call Report are being introduced.
Because any revisions to the reporting requirements for the Call Report
itself normally take effect in the first quarter of the year, delaying
the final phase of the electronic filing timetable until the March 31,
1998, report date, might result in the smallest banks having to contend
with reporting new or revised types of information in the Call Report
in the same quarter that they are, for the first time, using Call
Report software or arranging for a third party to convert their Call
Report data from paper to electronic form.
Moreover, the FFIEC does not believe that delaying electronic
filing until after the FFIEC and the agencies have streamlined the Call
Report in accordance with the mandate in Section 307 of the Riegle
Community Development and Regulatory Improvement Act of 1994, as
suggested by the ABA, is warranted. The FFIEC and the agencies remain
committed to achieving the goals that Congress set for them in Section
307 in an orderly and well thought out manner. After considering the
comments received, the Agencies believe that the benefits of using
software to prepare the Call Report in its current form outweighs the
costs. Accordingly, the FFIEC sees no reason to postpone the date when
the agencies receive all Call Reports in electronic form their
collection agent beyond the filing period for the year-end 1997
reports.
The ABA expressed concern that an electronic filing requirement
would make it easier for the agencies to make unnecessary changes to
the Call Report. Revisions to the Call Report requirements remain
subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, which requires the
agencies to issue proposed reporting changes for public comment,
consider the comments received, and submit the final changes to OMB for
review and approval. Therefore, the implementation of electronic filing
for Call Report will not make it simpler for the agencies or the FFIEC
to change the Call Report.
One banker stated that he prepares his bank's Call Report using
spreadsheet software of his own design and that this method is less
costly for his bank than purchasing Call Report software from a
software vender. He recommended that the agencies, in conjunction with
EDS, develop a method that would enable banks that want to use
internally-developed spreadsheets to transmit their spreadsheets to the
agencies' electronic collection agent. The FFIEC and the agencies
considered this suggestion, but concluded that having the agencies
[[Page 39055]]
design an additional electronic filing method would not be feasible and
practicable. As the proposal noted, banks wishing to file
electronically already have as an alternative to purchasing software
the option of developing a spreadsheet or some other software program.
In this regard, the agencies have for nearly 10 years permitted any
bank to design its own Call Report preparation software, obtain
information from the electronic collection agent about the features
necessary for the bank to electronically transmit its Call Report and
add these features to its software, and complete a certification
process with the collection agent to ensure that the bank's software
can successfully transmit the bank's Call Report data file.
Furthermore, because a bank that uses internally-developed spreadsheet
software to assist in the preparation of its Call Report would
currently submit its completed report on the paper report forms, the
proposal's previously mentioned paper-based alternative also would be
available to the bank
Finally, the Illinois Bankers Association mentioned that some
bankers had questioned the security of the electronic transmission
process and the potential for transmission errors that could render the
Call Report data inaccurate. In this regard, EDS, the banking agencies'
electronic collection agent, has established procedures to ensure that
the electronically transmitted Call Report files are secure and that
the data remains confidential. When a bank transmits its completed Call
Report to EDS, it does so over a private packet-switching network. An
individual bank's data file is transmitted to EDS in ``packets,'' which
means that the complete file is broken into smaller files that are sent
individually. This procedure adds security because a bank's Call Report
data is never on the private network as a single complete file. In
addition, EDS's private network is highly reliable because it is
designed to reroute or ``switch'' transmission traffic when necessary
to avoid transmission errors. Once a bank's multiple ``packets'' of
Call Report data have been received by EDS, the packets are reassembled
into the bank's Call Report data file and stored in secure, remote
directories that deny access to unauthorized users because they employ
appropriate usercode and password security. Before EDS makes its
periodic transmissions of Call Report data files of the banking
agencies, the files to be transmitted are reformatted into a bulk file
format which is compressed and bears little resemblance to the original
Call Report files. EDS then transmits the Call Report bulk data file
over its private network to the Board's private network. Because these
networks use private lines, they are protected from dial access by
unauthorized users.
(This signature page pertains to the joint notice and request for
comment, ``submission for OMB review; comment request'')
Dated: July 15, 1997.
Karen Solomon,
Director, Legislative and Regulatory Activities Division, Office of the
Comptroller of the Currency.
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, July 7, 1997.
William W. Wiles,
Secretary of the Board.
(This signature page pertains to the joint notice and request for
comment, ``agency information collection activities: submission for
OMB review; comment request'')
Dated at Washington, D.C., this 3rd day of July, 1997.
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Valerie J. Best,
Assistant Executive Secretary (Operations).
[FR Doc. 97-19115 Filed 7-18-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-33-M, 6210-01-M, 6714-01-M
