98-19045. Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-9, DC-9-80, and C-9 (Military) Series Airplanes, and Model MD-88 Airplanes  

  • [Federal Register Volume 63, Number 139 (Tuesday, July 21, 1998)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 39016-39018]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 98-19045]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    
    Federal Aviation Administration
    
    14 CFR Part 39
    
    [Docket No. 97-NM-105-AD; Amendment 39-10666; AD 98-15-15]
    RIN 2120-AA64
    
    
    Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-9, DC-9-80, 
    and C-9 (Military) Series Airplanes, and Model MD-88 Airplanes
    
    AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
    
    ACTION: Final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This amendment supersedes an existing airworthiness directive 
    (AD), applicable to certain McDonnell Douglas Model DC-9, DC-9-80, and 
    C-9 (military) series airplanes, and Model MD-88 airplanes, that 
    currently requires an inspection to detect chafing on the FIREX pipe 
    assembly of the number one engine; and either repair of chafed pipe 
    assemblies or replacement of the chafed pipe assemblies with new pipe 
    assemblies; and modification of the FIREX and the pneumatic sense pipe 
    assembly clamp marriage. This amendment revises the applicability of 
    the existing AD to include additional airplanes and remove others. This 
    amendment is prompted by reports of incidents in which the pneumatic 
    sense pipe chafed against the FIREX supply pipe of the number one 
    engine. The actions specified by this AD are intended to prevent 
    chafing of the FIREX supply pipe, which could result in a hole in the 
    pipe and consequently prevent the proper distribution of the fire 
    extinguishing agent within the nacelle in the event of a fire.
    
    DATES: Effective August 25, 1998.
        The incorporation by reference of McDonnell Douglas DC-9 Service 
    Bulletin 26-25, dated May 25, 1994; McDonnell Douglas Service Bulletin 
    DC9-26-025, Revision 03, dated July 25, 1996; McDonnell Douglas Service 
    Bulletin DC9-26-025, Revision 04, dated April 30, 1997; and McDonnell 
    Douglas Service Bulletin DC9-26-025, Revision 05, dated May 29, 1998; 
    as listed in the regulations, is approved by the Director of the 
    Federal Register as of August 25, 1998.
        The incorporation by reference of McDonnell Douglas DC-9 Service 
    Bulletin 26-25, Revision 1, dated September 30, 1994; and McDonnell 
    Douglas DC-9 Service Bulletin 26-25, Revision 2, dated April 18, 1995; 
    was approved previously by the Director of the Federal Register as of 
    July 24, 1995 (60 FR 32579, June 23, 1995).
    
    ADDRESSES: The service information referenced in this AD may be 
    obtained from The Boeing Company, Douglas Products Division, 3855 
    Lakewood Boulevard, Long Beach, California 90846, Attention: Technical 
    Publications Business Administration, Dept. C1-L51 (2-60). This 
    information may be examined at the Federal Aviation Administration 
    (FAA), Transport Airplane Directorate, Rules Docket, 1601 Lind Avenue, 
    SW., Renton, Washington; or at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 
    Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office, 3960 Paramount Boulevard, 
    Lakewood, California; or at the Office of the Federal Register, 800 
    North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Baitoo, Aerospace Engineer, 
    Propulsion Branch, ANM-140L, FAA, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification 
    Office, 3960 Paramount Boulevard,
    
    [[Page 39017]]
    
    Lakewood, California 90712; telephone (562) 627-5245; fax (562) 627-
    5210.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal 
    Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) by superseding AD 95-12-25, 
    amendment 39-9278 (60 FR 32579, June 23, 1995), which is applicable to 
    certain McDonnell Douglas Model DC-9, DC-9-80, and C-9 (military) 
    series airplanes, and Model MD-88 airplanes, was published in the 
    Federal Register on January 5, 1998 (63 FR 174). The action proposed to 
    continue to require an inspection to detect chafing on the FIREX pipe 
    assembly of the number one engine; and either repair of chafed pipe 
    assemblies or replacement of the chafed pipe assemblies with new pipe 
    assemblies; and modification of the FIREX and the pneumatic sense pipe 
    assembly clamp marriage.
    
    Comments
    
        Interested persons have been afforded an opportunity to participate 
    in the making of this amendment. Due consideration has been given to 
    the single comment received.
        The commenter supports the proposed rule.
    
    Explanation of Changes to This Final Rule
    
        Since the issuance of the proposal, the FAA has reviewed and 
    approved McDonnell Douglas Service Bulletin DC9-26-025, Revision 05, 
    dated May 29, 1998. This revision is essentially the same as McDonnell 
    Douglas Service Bulletin DC9-26-025, Revision 04, dated April 30, 1997; 
    however, minor edits have been incorporated. The FAA has revised this 
    final rule to reference Revision 05 as an additional source of service 
    information for accomplishment of the required actions.
    
    Conclusion
    
        After careful review of the available data, including the comment 
    noted above, the FAA has determined that air safety and the public 
    interest require the adoption of the rule with the change previously 
    described. The FAA has determined that this change will neither 
    increase the economic burden on any operator nor increase the scope of 
    the AD.
    
    Cost Impact
    
        There are approximately 1,691 McDonnell Douglas Model DC-9, DC-9-
    80, and C-9 (military) series airplanes, and Model MD-88 airplanes of 
    the affected design in the worldwide fleet. The FAA estimates that 834 
    airplanes of U.S. registry will be affected by this AD.
        The actions that are currently required by AD 95-12-25, and 
    retained in this AD, take approximately 1 work hour per airplane to 
    accomplish, at an average labor rate of $60 per work hour. The cost of 
    required parts will be nominal. Based on these figures, the cost impact 
    of the currently required actions on U.S. operators is estimated to be 
    $50,040, or $60 per airplane.
        The cost impact figure discussed above is based on assumptions that 
    no operator has yet accomplished any of the requirements of this AD 
    action, and that no operator would accomplish those actions in the 
    future if this AD were not adopted.
    
    Regulatory Impact
    
        The regulations adopted herein will not have substantial direct 
    effects on the States, on the relationship between the national 
    government and the States, or on the distribution of power and 
    responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in 
    accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this final 
    rule does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the 
    preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
        For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is 
    not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866; 
    (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and 
    Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) will not have a 
    significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial 
    number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory 
    Flexibility Act. A final evaluation has been prepared for this action 
    and it is contained in the Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained 
    from the Rules Docket at the location provided under the caption 
    ADDRESSES.
    
    List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
    
        Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by 
    reference, Safety.
    
    Adoption of the Amendment
    
        Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the 
    Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of 
    the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
    
    PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
    
        1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
    
    
    Sec. 39.13  [Amended]
    
        2. Section 39.13 is amended by removing amendment 39-9278 (60 FR 
    32579, June 23, 1995), and by adding a new airworthiness directive 
    (AD), amendment 39-10666, to read as follows:
    
    98-15-15  McDonnell Douglas: Amendment 39-10666. Docket 97-NM-105-
    AD. Supersedes AD 95-12-25, Amendment 39-9278.
    
        Applicability: Model DC-9-30, -40, and -50 series airplanes; 
    Model DC-9-81 (MD-81), DC-9-82 (MD-82), DC-9-83 (MD-83), and DC-9-87 
    (MD-87) series airplanes; Model MD-88 airplanes; and C-9 (military) 
    series airplanes; as listed in McDonnell Douglas Service Bulletin 
    DC9-26-025, Revision 04, dated April 30, 1997; certificated in any 
    category.
    
        Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the 
    preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been 
    modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the 
    requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified, 
    altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of 
    this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an 
    alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (b) of 
    this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of 
    the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition 
    addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been 
    eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to 
    address it.
    
        Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished 
    previously.
        To prevent chafing of the FIREX supply pipe, which could result 
    in a hole in the pipe and consequently prevent the proper 
    distribution of the fire extinguishing agent within the nacelle in 
    the event of a fire, accomplish the following:
        (a) Within 8 months after the effective date of this AD, perform 
    an inspection to detect chafing of the FIREX pipe assembly of the 
    number one engine, in accordance with McDonnell Douglas DC-9 Service 
    Bulletin 26-25, dated May 25, 1994; McDonnell Douglas DC-9 Service 
    Bulletin 26-25, Revision 1, dated September 30, 1994; McDonnell 
    Douglas DC-9 Service Bulletin 26-25, Revision 2, dated April 18, 
    1995; McDonnell Douglas Service Bulletin DC9-26-025, Revision 03, 
    dated July 25, 1996; McDonnell Douglas Service Bulletin DC9-26-025, 
    Revision 04, dated April 30, 1997; or McDonnell Douglas Service 
    Bulletin DC9-26-025, Revision 05, dated May 29, 1998.
        (1) If any chafing is detected, prior to further flight, 
    accomplish paragraphs (a)(1)(i) and (a)(1)(ii) of this AD in 
    accordance with the service bulletin. Where there are differences 
    between the requirements of this AD and the procedures specified in 
    the service bulletin, the AD prevails.
        (i) Either repair chafed pipe assemblies or replace chafed pipe 
    assemblies with new or serviceable pipe assemblies. And
        (ii) Modify the FIREX and the pneumatic sense pipe assembly 
    clamp marriage.
        (2) If no chafing is detected, prior to further flight, modify 
    the FIREX and the pneumatic
    
    [[Page 39018]]
    
    sense pipe assembly clamp marriage in accordance with the service 
    bulletin.
        (b) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the 
    compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be 
    used if approved by the Manager, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification 
    Office (ACO), FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate. Operators shall 
    submit their requests through an appropriate FAA Principal 
    Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send it to the 
    Manager, Los Angeles ACO.
    
        Note 2: Information concerning the existence of approved 
    alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be 
    obtained from the Los Angeles ACO.
    
        (c) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with 
    sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 
    CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where 
    the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
        (d) The actions shall be done in accordance with McDonnell 
    Douglas DC-9 Service Bulletin 26-25, dated May 25, 1994; McDonnell 
    Douglas DC-9 Service Bulletin 26-25, Revision 1, dated September 30, 
    1994; McDonnell Douglas DC-9 Service Bulletin 26-25, Revision 2, 
    dated April 18, 1995; McDonnell Douglas Service Bulletin DC9-26-025, 
    Revision 03, dated July 25, 1996; McDonnell Douglas Service Bulletin 
    DC9-26-025, Revision 04, dated April 30, 1997; or McDonnell Douglas 
    Service Bulletin DC9-26-025, Revision 05, dated May 29, 1998.
        (1) The incorporation by reference of McDonnell Douglas DC-9 
    Service Bulletin 26-25, dated May 25, 1994; McDonnell Douglas 
    Service Bulletin DC9-26-025, Revision 03, dated July 25, 1996; and 
    McDonnell Douglas Service Bulletin DC9-26-025, Revision 04, dated 
    April 30, 1997; and McDonnell Douglas Service Bulletin DC9-26-025, 
    Revision 05, dated May 29, 1998; is approved by the Director of the 
    Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 
    51.
        (2) The incorporation by reference of McDonnell Douglas DC-9 
    Service Bulletin 26-25, Revision 1, dated September 30, 1994; and 
    McDonnell Douglas DC-9 Service Bulletin 26-25, Revision 2, dated 
    April 18, 1995; was approved previously by the Director of the 
    Federal Register as of July 24, 1995 (60 FR 32579, June 23, 1995).
        (3) Copies may be obtained from The Boeing Company, Douglas 
    Products Division, 3855 Lakewood Boulevard, Long Beach, California 
    90846, Attention: Technical Publications Business Administration, 
    Dept. C1-L51 (2-60). Copies may be inspected at the FAA, Transport 
    Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or 
    at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, Los Angeles Aircraft 
    Certification Office, 3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, 
    California; or at the Office of the Federal Register, 800 North 
    Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.
        (e) This amendment becomes effective on August 25, 1998.
        Issued in Renton, Washington, on July 10, 1998.
    
    Darrell M. Pederson,
    Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification 
    Service.
    [FR Doc. 98-19045 Filed 7-20-98; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-13-U
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
8/25/1998
Published:
07/21/1998
Department:
Federal Aviation Administration
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
98-19045
Dates:
Effective August 25, 1998.
Pages:
39016-39018 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 97-NM-105-AD, Amendment 39-10666, AD 98-15-15
RINs:
2120-AA64: Airworthiness Directives
RIN Links:
https://www.federalregister.gov/regulations/2120-AA64/airworthiness-directives
PDF File:
98-19045.pdf
CFR: (1)
14 CFR 39.13