[Federal Register Volume 59, Number 140 (Friday, July 22, 1994)]
[Unknown Section]
[Page 0]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 94-17889]
[[Page Unknown]]
[Federal Register: July 22, 1994]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[ER-FRL-4713-5]
Environmental Impact Statements and Regulations; Availability of
EPA Comments
Availability of EPA comments prepared July 04, 1994 Through July
08, 1994 pursuant to the Environmental Review Process (ERP), under
Section 309 of the Clean Air Act and Section 102(2)(C) of the National
Environmental Policy Act as amended. Requests for copies of EPA
comments can be directed to the Office of Federal Activities at (202)
260-5076.
An explanation of the ratings assigned to draft environmental
impact statements (EISs) was published in FR dated April 08, 1994 (59
FR 16807).
Draft EISs
ERP No. D-BLM-L65225-OR Rating LO, Upper Klamath Basin Resource
Management Plan, Implementation, Klamath Falls Resource Area, Lakeview
District, Klamath County, OR.
Summary: EPA had no objection to the proposed action.
ERP No. D-FHW-L40190-AK Rating EO2, Sterling Highway (Miles Post
37-60) Transportation Project, Reconstruction between Skilak Lake Road
(east) and the Seward Wye, Funding, COE Section 10 and 404 Permits,
NPDES Permit, Special-Use Permit and US Coast Guard Permit, AK.
Summary: EPA expressed environmental objections based on potential
water quality standards violations; the need for complete mitigation
and monitoring discussion and the need for a cumulative effects
analysis. Additional information was requested to clarify compliance
with State water quality standards; for monitoring and mitigation
strategies; and for cumulative effects analysis.
ERP No. D-NPS-L65229-AK Rating EC2, Brooks River Area Development,
Use and Management Plan, Implementation, Katmai National Park, AK.
Summary: EPA expressed environmental concerns with impacts to
wetlands and water quality from road and other construction and
accidental fuel spills. EPA requests that wetlands be formally
delineated, mitigation and contingency measures be developed and that
this information be included in the final EIS.
ERP No. D-SCS-D36111-WV Rating EC1, Upper Buffalo Creek Watershed,
Flood Prevention and Watershed Protection, Funding, City of Mannington,
Marion County, WV.
Summary: EPA suggested that the final EIS further address cost-
benefit ratios and emergent wetland vegetation.
Final EISs
ERP No. F-AFS-L65212-ID Prichard Creek Analysis Area, Land and
Resource Management Plan, Implementation, Idaho Panhandle National
Forests, Wallace Ranger District, Coeur d'Alene River, ID.
Summary: Review of the Final EIS has been completed and the project
found to be satisfactory.
Dated: July 19, 1994
William D. Dickerson,
Deputy Director, Office of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. 94-17889 Filed 7-21-94; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-U
