98-19869. Certain Removable Electronic Cards and Electronic Card Reader Devices and Products Containing Same; Notice of Final Determination  

  • [Federal Register Volume 63, Number 142 (Friday, July 24, 1998)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 39890-39891]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 98-19869]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
    
    [Inv. No. 337-TA-396]
    
    
    Certain Removable Electronic Cards and Electronic Card Reader 
    Devices and Products Containing Same; Notice of Final Determination
    
    AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
    
    ACTION: Notice.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade 
    Commission has determined to find no
    
    [[Page 39891]]
    
    violation of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 in the above-
    captioned investigation.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Diehl, Esq., Office of the 
    General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, telephone 202-
    205-3095.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation 
    on April 2, 1997, on the basis of a complaint filed by Innovatron S.A. 
    (``Innovatron''). 62 FR 15728. The complaint, as subsequently amended, 
    named two respondents--Thomson Multimedia, S.A. and Thomson Consumer 
    Electronics, Inc.
        In its complaint, Innovatron alleged that respondents violated 
    section 337 by importing into the United States, and selling after 
    importation, television receivers and receiver access cards that 
    infringe claim 8 of Innovatron's U.S. Letters Patent 4,404,464 (the 
    ``'464 patent''). The presiding administrative law judge (``ALJ'') held 
    an evidentiary hearing from September 29 to October 7, 1997.
        On March 24, 1998, the ALJ issued his final ID finding a violation 
    of section 337. He found that claim 8 of the `464 patent was not 
    invalid due to anticipation or obviousness, that there have been 
    importations and sales after importation of the accused devices, and 
    that the accused devices can be used to practice the method patented in 
    claim 8 of the `464 patent. He also found that respondents actively 
    induced infringement of claim 8 of the `464 patent and that they 
    contributorily infringed that claim as well. Finally, the ALJ found 
    that there is a domestic industry with respect to the `464 patent.
        On April 6, 1998, the Commission investigative attorney and the 
    Thomson respondents filed petitions for review of the ALJ's final ID. 
    Complainant Innovatron filed a response in opposition to the petitions. 
    The Commission determined to review the bulk of the ID and directed the 
    parties to file written responses addressing certain questions posed in 
    the Commission's notice of review, and the issues of remedy, the public 
    interest, and bonding. In accordance with the Commission's directions, 
    the parties filed initial briefs on June 11, 1998, and reply briefs on 
    June 18, 1998.
        Having examined the record in this investigation, including the ID, 
    the review briefs, and the responses thereto, the Commission determined 
    that there is no violation of section 337. More specifically, the 
    Commission modified the ALJ's construction of claim 8 of the `464 
    patent, and found the claim as properly construed to be valid but not 
    infringed by users of the accused imported products. The Commission 
    found further that the domestic industry requirement is not met in this 
    investigation.
        This action is taken under the authority of section 337 of the 
    Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. Sec. 1337) and sections 210.42-.45 of the 
    Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 210.42-.45).
        Copies of the public version of the ID, the Commission's order and 
    opinion, and all other nonconfidential documents filed in connection 
    with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during 
    official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the 
    Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW, 
    Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202-205-2000. Hearing-impaired persons 
    are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by 
    contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-1810. General 
    information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing 
    its Internet server (http://www.usitc.gov).
    
        Issued: July 20, 1998.
    
        By order of the Commission.
    Donna R. Koehnke,
    Secretary.
    [FR Doc. 98-19869 Filed 7-23-98; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
07/24/1998
Department:
International Trade Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Notice.
Document Number:
98-19869
Pages:
39890-39891 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Inv. No. 337-TA-396
PDF File:
98-19869.pdf