97-19805. Illinois Power Company; Clinton Power Station, Unit No. 1 Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact  

  • [Federal Register Volume 62, Number 143 (Friday, July 25, 1997)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 40123-40124]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 97-19805]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
    
    [Docket No. 50-461]
    
    
    Illinois Power Company; Clinton Power Station, Unit No. 1 
    Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact
    
        The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) is 
    considering issuance of an exemption from certain requirements of its 
    regulations to Facility Operating License No. NPF-62, issued to 
    Illinois Power Company (the licensee), for operation of the Clinton 
    Power Station, Unit No. 1, located in DeWitt County, Illinois.
    
    Environmental Assessment
    
    Identification of the Proposed Action
    
        The proposed action is in accordance with the licensee's 
    application dated July 22, 1997, for a temporary, partial exemption 
    from the requirements contained in General Design Criterion (GDC) 17, 
    ``Electric Power Systems,'' of Appendix A to 10 CFR 50. The requested 
    exemption would only be effective through and including October 15, 
    1997, and would permit plant operation with one fully qualified offsite 
    circuit and one circuit that does not strictly conform to the capacity 
    and capability requirements of GDC 17.
    
    The Need for the Proposed Action
    
        GDC 17 requires that an onsite and an offsite electric power system 
    be provided to permit functioning of structures, systems, and 
    components important to safety. The safety function for each of these 
    two systems (assuming the other system is not functioning) is to 
    provide sufficient capacity and capability to assure that (1) specified 
    acceptable fuel design limits and design conditions of the reactor 
    coolant pressure boundary are not exceeded as a result of anticipated 
    operational occurrences, and (2) the core is cooled and containment 
    integrity and other vital functions are maintained in the event of 
    postulated accidents.
        The Clinton Power Station (CPS) licensing basis assumes two 
    independent offsite electric power sources that are capable of 
    supplying power to emergency buses. These consist of 138-kV and 345-kV 
    offsite circuits. During the current refueling outage at CPS, the 
    licensee has determined that, for short and intermittent periods of 
    time, voltage on the 345-kV offsite source has not consistently 
    remained above the minimum required value conservatively established 
    for CPS. This is primarily due to the fact that unusually low voltages 
    are occurring as a result of the current lack of operating generators 
    in Illinois, coupled with high load demands during peak hours. The 
    licensee has determined that all practical measures taken to boost 
    voltage, short of interrupting service to customers, are not sufficient 
    to maintain required voltage. Further action to restore voltage would 
    necessitate power interruptions.
        Conformance to GDC 17 requires that both offsite sources have 
    sufficient capacity and capability such that voltage is continuously 
    maintained above the minimum values conservatively established for the 
    facility. Due to the intermittent voltage conditions for the 345-kV 
    system described above, the licensee cannot demonstrate that this 
    offsite circuit has sufficient capacity and capability at all times. 
    With this offsite source experiencing intermittent periods of lower 
    than expected voltage, it would have to be declared inoperable. Plant 
    startup or continued plant operation is not permitted with one offsite 
    source inoperable.
        The licensee has proposed a temporary, partial exemption to the 
    requirements of GDC 17 that would only be effective through and 
    including October 15, 1997. The exemption would temporarily allow plant 
    operation with one fully qualified offsite circuit and one circuit that 
    does not strictly conform to the capacity and capability requirements 
    of GDC 17. Strict compliance with GDC 17 is not necessary to achieve 
    the underlying purpose of the rule and would impose undue hardship to 
    the licensee. The licensee has implemented measures to assess when the 
    345-kV system voltage would be inadequate in the event of a plant trip, 
    performed an analysis to assess the risk associated with continued 
    plant operation for the period of time within which the intermittent 
    condition is likely to occur (i.e., through the end of hot, summer 
    weather), and established procedures that will restore
    
    [[Page 40124]]
    
    bus voltage within 10 minutes in the event that it is needed.
    
    Environmental Impacts of the Proposed Action
    
        The Commission has completed its evaluation of the proposed action 
    and concludes that the proposed exemption would not increase the 
    probability or consequences of accidents previously analyzed and would 
    not affect facility radiation levels or facility radiological 
    effluents.
        Granting the exemption would not significantly increase the 
    probability of unavailable offsite power in the event of an accident 
    and, therefore, would not significantly increase the probability of a 
    radiological release from CPS. The availability and reliability of the 
    onsite power sources would not be affected by the exemption. The 
    availability and reliability of the offsite source having adequate 
    voltage (i.e., the 138-kV circuit) would also not be affected. Although 
    there is a slight increase in the probability of having the low-voltage 
    offsite source unavailable following a plant trip, or both sources 
    unavailable in the event of a loss of the other offsite source, this 
    increase is small based on the factors identified, and actions 
    available to restore offsite voltage.
        Electric power would still be available for safety-related 
    equipment required to mitigate an accident. The proposed change does 
    not involve an increase in the consequences of an accident, no changes 
    are being made in the types of any effluents that may be released 
    offsite, and there is no significant increase in the allowable 
    individual or cumulative occupational radiation exposure. Accordingly, 
    the Commission concludes that there are no significant radiological 
    environmental impacts associated with the proposed action.
        With regard to potential nonradiological impacts, the proposed 
    action involves features located entirely within the restricted area as 
    defined in 10 CFR Part 20. It does not affect nonradiological plant 
    effluents and has no other environmental impact. Accordingly, the 
    Commission concludes that there are no significant nonradiological 
    environmental impacts associated with the proposed action.
    
    Alternatives to the Proposed Action
    
        Since the Commission has concluded that there is no measurable 
    environmental impact associated with the proposed action, any 
    alternatives with equal or greater environmental impact need not be 
    evaluated. The principal alternative to the proposed action would be to 
    deny the requested action. Denial of the requested action would 
    effectively preclude operation of the facility until the intermittent 
    voltage condition is resolved (i.e., until the end of hot, summer 
    weather).
    
    Alternative Use of Resources
    
        This action does not involve the use of resources not previously 
    considered in connection with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Final 
    Environmental Statement dated May 1982, related to the operation of the 
    Clinton Power Station, Unit No. 1.
    
    Agencies and Persons Consulted
    
        In accordance with its stated policy, on July 22, 1997, the NRC 
    staff consulted with the Illinois State representative regarding the 
    environmental impact of the proposed action. The State official had no 
    comments.
    
    Finding of No Significant Impact
    
        Based upon the foregoing environmental assessment, the Commission 
    concludes that the proposed action will not have a significant effect 
    on the quality of the human environment. Accordingly, the Commission 
    has determined not to prepare an environmental impact statement for the 
    proposed action.
        For further details with respect to this action, see the licensee's 
    letter dated July 22, 1997, which is available for public inspection at 
    the Commission's Public Document Room, the Gelman Building, 2120 L 
    Street, NW., Washington, DC, and at the local public document room 
    located at the Vespasian Warner Public Library, 310 N. Quincy Street, 
    Clinton, IL 61727.
    
        Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 23rd day of July 1997.
    
        For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
    Gail H. Marcus,
    Director, Project Directorate III-3, Division of Reactor Projects III/
    IV, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
    [FR Doc. 97-19805 Filed 7-24-97; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
07/25/1997
Department:
Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
97-19805
Pages:
40123-40124 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 50-461
PDF File:
97-19805.pdf