[Federal Register Volume 64, Number 142 (Monday, July 26, 1999)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 40311-40314]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 99-18955]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
13 CFR Part 121
Small Business Size Standards; General Building Contractors,
Heavy Construction, Dredging and Surface Cleanup Activities, Special
Trade Contractors, Garbage and Refuse Collection, and Refuse Systems
AGENCY: Small Business Administration.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Small Business Administration (SBA) proposes a size
standard of $25.0 million in average annual receipts for all industries
in General Building Contractors (Standard Industrial Classification
(SIC) Major Group 15) and for all industries except Dredging and
Surface Cleanup Activities in Heavy Construction Other Than Building
Construction (SIC Major Group 16); $20.0 million for Dredging and
Surface Cleanup Activities (part of SIC 1629, Heavy Construction, Not
Elsewhere Classified (NEC)); $10.5 million for all Special Trade
Contractors industries (SIC Major Group 17); and $9.0 million for
Garbage and Refuse Collection, Without Disposal (part of SIC 4212,
Local Trucking Without Storage), and Refuse Systems (SIC 4953). The
proposed revisions are being made to adjust these industries' size
standards for the effects of inflation since the time they were
established in the mid-1980s.
DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before September 24, 1999.
ADDRESSES: Send comments to Gary M. Jackson, Assistant Administrator
for Size Standards, 409 3rd Street, SW, Mail Code 6880, Washington DC
20416.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert N. Ray, Office of Size
Standards, (202) 205-6618.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: SBA proposes revisions to its size standards
in two industry groups--Construction and Refuse Systems and Related
Services. For Construction, SBA proposes an increase to the size
standards for all industries in General Building Contractors and Heavy
Construction (except Dredging and Surface Cleanup Activities), Major
Groups 15 and 16, respectively, from $17 million in average annual
receipts to $25 million; for Dredging and Surface Cleanup Activities (a
component of SIC 1629, Heavy Construction, NEC), from $13.5 million to
$20 million; and for all industries in Special Trade Contractors, Major
Group 17, from $7 million to $10.5 million. For the two industries
comprising Refuse Systems and Related Services, SBA proposes an
increase to the size standard from $6 million to $9 million for Garbage
and Refuse Collection, part of SIC 4212 (Local Trucking Without
Storage) and for Refuse Systems, SIC 4953.
These proposed revisions adjust the current size standards for
inflation that has occurred since 1984, when all but one of these size
standards became effective. The size standard for Dredging and Surface
Cleanup Activities became effective on December 9, 1985 (50 FR 46418,
November 8, 1985), based on a special study of the industrial structure
of the Dredging industry. That study essentially verified that the
inflation adjustment of 40% which applied to all other Construction
industries in 1984 was also appropriate for Dredging. Thus, SBA
believes it is appropriate to apply the 1994 inflation adjustment to
the Dredging industry without any adjustment for the later date when
the Dredging size standard actually took effect.
From September 30, 1988 until September 30, 1996, SBA was
prohibited by statute from changing the size standards for the
Construction and Refuse Systems and Related Services industries. These
industries are subject to the special procurement procedures of the
Small Business Competitiveness Demonstration Program (Program) (Title
VII of Pub. L. 100-656, 102 Stat. 3853, 3889). This Program specifies
special procedures on the use of small business set-aside contracting
for the procurement of services within four designated industry groups.
The designated groups are: Construction (SIC codes 1521-1542, SIC codes
1611-1629 and SIC codes 1711-1799); Engineering Services (SIC code
8711), Architectural Services (SIC code 8712), and Surveying and
Mapping Services (SIC codes 8713 and part of SIC code 7389); Refuse
Systems and Related Services (SIC code 4953 and part of SIC code 4212);
and Non-nuclear Ship Repair (part of SIC code 3731, Ship Building and
Repairing).
Between 1988 and 1996, the Program included a provision that
prohibited any change to the size standards for any industry in the
designated industry groups that were in effect as of September 30,
1988. However, the Small Business Act of 1996 included an amendment to
the Program that repealed this prohibition (Omnibus Consolidated
Appropriations Act, 1997, Division D, Title I, section 108 of Pub. L.
104-208, 110 Stat. 3009-733.) In the accompanying legislative history,
Congress indicated that SBA should take appropriate action to adjust
the size standards for the designated industry groups, although no
specific guidance was provided on how these size standards should be
adjusted by SBA.
SBA's preliminary assessment of the industries covered by the
Program indicated that the size standards for the Engineering Services,
Architectural Services, and Surveying and Mapping Services industries,
among the lowest of SBA's size standards, were more in need of
adjustment than the other size standards. Further review of those
industries led to a proposed rule to increase their size standards
published
[[Page 40312]]
on February 3, 1998 (63 FR 5480) and a final rule adopting new size
standards published on May 14, 1999 (64 FR 26275). At this time, SBA is
proposing only an inflation adjustment to the remaining industries
covered by the Program which have a receipts-based size standard. A
decision will be made at a later time on whether to propose a change to
the 1,000-employee size standard for Non-nuclear Ship Repair.
The inflation adjustment proposed for the Construction and Refuse
Systems and Related Services industries' size standards is identical to
the percentage SBA made to most of its receipts-based size standards in
1994 (see 59 FR 16513, April 7, 1994) to account for the effects of
inflation that had occurred since 1984, the year of SBA's previous
inflationary adjustment (49 FR 5024, February 9, 1984). SBA is choosing
to adjust these size standards to the levels that would have occurred
in 1994, if they could have been adjusted at that time, so that all
receipts-based size standards will be adjusted for inflation to the
same point in time. All of SBA's receipts-based size standards will
have been adjusted to the same time period if this rule becomes final
(except for the agricultural production size standards which are
statutorily set). SBA recognizes that inflation has occurred since
1994, but not to a sufficient amount to warrant further adjustment at
this time to these or other receipts-based size standards. SBA will
make a consistent inflation adjustment to all receipts-based size
standards when data suggest the need for such an inflation adjustment.
Inflation Adjustment Methodology
On April 7, 1994, SBA adjusted most of its receipt-based size
standards to account for the effects of inflation that had occurred
since SBA's previous inflationary adjustment in 1984 (59 FR 16513,
April 7, 1994). In that rule, SBA applied an inflation adjustment of
48.2% to each receipts-based size standard and then rounded that level
to the nearest half million dollar increment. This rounding method
produces increases to most industry size standards that are slightly
above or below the calculated inflation rate of 48.2%.
In determining the rate of inflation, SBA used the U.S. Department
of Commerce's Gross Domestic Product (GDP) Implicit Price Deflator. The
1994 adjustment calculated inflation from the third quarter of 1982
(the ending period for the previous inflation adjustment in 1984) to
the fourth quarter of 1993 (the latest data available at the time of
the 1994 final rule). SBA proposes to make the same adjustments to the
industries addressed in this notice of proposed rulemaking.
Dominant in Field of Operation
Section 3(a) of the Small Business Act defines a small concern as
one that is:
1. Independently owned and operated,
2. Not dominant in its field of operation, and
3. Meets detailed definitions or standards established by the
Administrator of SBA.
In lieu of a separate small business eligibility criterion, SBA
includes as part of its evaluation of a size standard whether a concern
at or below a recommended size standard would be considered dominant in
its field of operation. This assessment generally takes into
consideration the market share of firms at a recommended size standard,
or other factors that may reveal if a firm can exercise a major
controlling influence on a national basis in which significant numbers
of business concerns are engaged.
SBA has determined that at the recommended size standards of $25.0
million for General Building Contractors and Heavy Construction, $20
million for Dredging and Surface Cleanup Activities, $10.5 million for
Special Trade Contractors and $9.0 million for Garbage and Refuse
Collection and for Refuse Systems, no firm at or below those levels
would be of a sufficient size to be dominant in its field of operation.
Firms at the proposed size standards generate less than one percent of
total industry sales for each industry reviewed in this proposed rule.
This low level of market share for the largest firm covered by SBA's
proposed size standards effectively precludes any ability by a firm to
exert a controlling effect on the industry in which it operates.
Alternative Size Standards
SBA considered adjusting the Construction and Refuse Systems and
Related Services size standards by the amount of inflation that has
been reported by the latest available GDP deflator (first quarter of
1999). The GDP deflator records an inflation rate of 60.6% from the
third quarter of 1982 through the first quarter of 1999. As discussed
earlier, if this adjustment were applied to the Construction and Refuse
Systems and Related Services size standards it would result in
receipts-based size standards being adjusted at different time periods.
SBA is closely monitoring the amount of inflation that has occurred
since the 1994 adjustment and will propose an inflation adjustment to
all receipts-based size standards when it has determined that a
significant amount of inflation has occurred to warrant such an
adjustment. Thus far, inflation has only increased 9.6% since the 1994
adjustment--an amount too small to warrant an inflation adjustment at
this time. Furthermore, industry data from the U.S. Bureau of the
Census' 1997 Economic Census will be available next year upon which to
reassess these industries' size standards.
SBA welcomes public comments on the proposed size standards for the
Construction and Refuse Systems and Related Services industries.
Comments on alternative size standards should explain the reasons why
they are preferable to the proposed size standards.
Compliance With Executive Orders 12612, 12988, and 12866, the
Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq., and the Paperwork
Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.
SBA certifies that this rule, if adopted, would be a significant
regulatory action within the meaning of Executive Order 12866 since it
is expected to have an annual economic impact of over $100 million. For
purposes of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, this rule would have a
significant impact on a substantial number of small businesses if
adopted. Immediately below, SBA has set forth an initial regulatory
flexibility analysis and economic impact analysis of this proposed
rule.
1. Description of Entities to Which the Rule Applies
SBA estimates that 2,279 additional firms would be considered small
as a result of this rule, if adopted. These firms would be eligible to
seek available SBA assistance provided they meet other program
requirements. Many of these firms (if in existence at the time)
probably had small business status in 1984 when the size standards for
these industries were established, but have since lost eligibility
because of inflationary increases.
Of the additional firms gaining eligibility, 621 operate in General
Building Contractors, 375 operate in Heavy Construction, 1,153 operate
in the Special Trade Construction industries, while 130 operate in
Refuse Systems and Related Services.
Firms becoming eligible for SBA assistance as a result of this rule
cumulatively generate $28.9 billion in annual sales, while total sales
in these industries are $564 billion. Of the $28.9 billion in annual
sales for newly eligible firms, $11.7 billion are in the General
[[Page 40313]]
Building Contractors industry, $7.2 billion are in Heavy Construction,
$9.1 billion are in the Special Trades and $0.9 billion are in Refuse
Systems and Related Services.
SBA estimates that out of the approximately $7.85 billion in total
initial Federal contracts per year, an additional $400 million worth of
contracts could be awarded to firms designated as small firms in the
four industry groups affected by this rule. Of these contracts, $378
million could be awarded to the newly defined firms and $22 million to
current small firms. These contracts could be obtained through awards
under the small business set-aside Program, the 8(a) Program, the Small
Disadvantaged Business (SDB) Program, the HUBZone Empowerment
Contracting Program, or on an unrestricted basis.
Also, these newly defined small businesses would be eligible for
SBA's financial assistance programs and could potentially receive an
estimated $21.2 million in loans under the 7(a) Guaranteed Loan Program
and $3.9 million in loans under the Certified Development Company (504)
Program.
2. Description of Potential Benefits of the Rule
This rule will result in an increase in the number of firms
eligible for small business set-aside contracts, the 8(a) Program, the
HUBZone Program, and SDB and HUBZone price preferences. For Federal
contracts set aside for small business or competed under the 8(a) and
HUBZone Programs, this rule will lead to an increase in competition for
these contracts and thus lower overall costs to the government.
When an SDB or HUBZone firm competes for an unrestricted contract,
the Federal government generally allows them a price preference of up
to 10%. This rule may increase the number of firms competing for these
contracts in two ways. First, the number of SDB and HUBZone firms will
increase. Second, with more small firms competing on unrestricted
contracts, the government may decide to set aside more contracts for
competition among all small businesses where they had previously
awarded price preferences. Any increase in competition that results in
a more efficient or competitive firm winning a contract will result in
a benefit.
3. Description of Potential Costs of the Rule
In areas where the rule acts to decrease competition for contacts,
it may lead to an increase in costs. This may occur in areas where
small businesses are currently not present or are not bidding on
Federal contracts. If, after issuance of this rule, small businesses
bid on these contracts and require the government to provide a price
preference or this rule causes a decision to set aside a contract under
one of the procurement preference programs, it may increase costs to
the Federal government on some contracts. These additional costs will
be relatively minor since, as a matter of policy, procurements may be
set aside for small businesses or under the 8(a) and HUBZone Programs
only if awards are expected to be made at fair and reasonable prices.
4. Transfers
The primary effect of the rule will be transfers among the four
parties involved--Federal government, large firms, firms gaining small
business status under this rule, and firms that are currently small
firms. SBA estimates that, of the $400 million in Federal contracts
expected to be awarded to the small firms, approximately 11.3%, or
$45.2 million, may be reallocated from large firms to current small
firms and the newly defined small firms.
The remaining $354.8 million of contacts will not change hands,
rather, the firms holding the contracts will be reclassified as small
under the rule. In addition, of $3.9 billion of initial contracts
awarded to small firms, SBA estimates that $43.8 million could be
transferred from current small firms to larger, more efficient or
competitive, newly defined small firms.
5. Description of Reasons Why This Action Is Being Taken and Objectives
of Rule
SBA has provided in the supplementary information a statement of
the reasons why these new size standards should be established and a
statement of the reasons for and the objectives of this rule.
For the purpose of the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et
seq., SBA certifies that this rule would not impose new reporting or
record keeping requirements. For purposes of Executive Order 12612, SBA
certifies that this rule does not have any federalism implications
warranting the preparation of a Federalism Assessment. For purposes of
Executive Order 12988, SBA certifies that this rule is drafted, to the
extent practicable, in accordance with the standards set forth in that
order.
List of Subjects in 13 CFR Part 121
Government procurement, Government property, Grant programs-
business, Loan programs-business, Small business.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, SBA proposes to amend 13
CFR part 121 as follows:
PART 121--SMALL BUSINESS SIZE REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 121 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: Pub. L. 105-135 sec. 601 et. seq., 111 Stat. 2592; 15
U.S.C. 632(a), 634(b)(6), 637(a), and 644(c); and Pub. L. 102-486,
106 Stat. 2776, 3133.
Sec. 121.201 [Amended]
2. In Sec. 121.201, the table ``SIZE STANDARDS BY SIC INDUSTRY,''
is amended as follows:
a. Revise DIVISION C--CONSTRUCTION:
b. Under DIVISION E--TRANSPORTATION, COMMUNICATIONS, ELECTRIC, GAS,
AND SANITARY SERVICES, MAJOR GROUP 42-MOTOR FREIGHT TRANSPORTATION AND
WAREHOUSING, revise the entry 4212 (Part):
c. Under DIVISION E--TRANSPORTATION, COMMUNICATIONS, ELECTRIC, GAS,
AND SANITARY SERVICES, MAJOR GROUP 49-ELECTRIC, GAS, AND SANITARY
SERVICES, revise the entry 4953 to read as follows:
Size Standards by SIC Industry
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Size standards in number of
SIC code and description employees or millions of
dollars
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * *
* * *
DIVISION C--CONSTRUCTION
------------------------------------------------------------------------
MAJOR GROUP 15-GENERAL BUILDING $25.0
CONTRACTORS.
[[Page 40314]]
MAJOR GROUP 16-HEAVY CONSTRUCTION, NON $25.0
BUILDING.
EXCEPT:
1629 (Part) Dredging and Surface $20.01 \1\
Cleanup Activities.
MAJOR GROUP 17--CONSTRUCTION-SPECIAL TRADE $10.5
CONTRACTORS.
* * * *
* * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
DIVISION E--TRANSPORTATION, COMMUNICATIONS, ELECTRIC, GAS, AND SANITARY
SERVICES
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * *
* * *
4212 (Part) Garbage and Refuse 9.0
Collection, Without Disposal.
* * * *
* * *
4953 Refuse Systems................... 9.0
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ SIC code 1629-Dredging: To be considered small for purposes of
Government procurement, a firm must perform at least 40 percent of the
volume dredged with its own equipment or equipment owned by another
small dredging concern.
Dated: May 28, 1999.
Aida Alvarez,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 99-18955 Filed 7-23-99; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
