99-19041. Standard Time Zone Boundary in the State of Nevada: Proposed Relocation  

  • [Federal Register Volume 64, Number 142 (Monday, July 26, 1999)]
    [Proposed Rules]
    [Pages 40331-40333]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 99-19041]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    
    Office of the Secretary
    
    49 CFR Part 71
    
    [OST Docket No. OST-99-5947]
    RIN 2105-AC82
    
    
    Standard Time Zone Boundary in the State of Nevada: Proposed 
    Relocation
    
    AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, DOT.
    
    ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: At the request of the City of West Wendover, Nevada, DOT 
    proposes to relocate the boundary between Pacific time and mountain 
    time in the State of Nevada. DOT proposes to relocate the boundary in 
    order to move West Wendover, Nevada from the Pacific Time Zone to the 
    Mountain Time Zone.
    
    DATES: Comments should be received by September 24, 1999 to be assured 
    of consideration. Comments received after that date will be considered 
    to the extent practicable. If the time zone boundary is changed as a 
    result of this rulemaking, the effective date would be 2:00 a.m. PDT 
    Sunday, October 31, 1999.
    
    ADDRESSES: You may submit your comments and related material by one of 
    the following methods:
        (1) By mail to the Docket Management Facility (OST-1999-5947), U.S. 
    Department of Transportation, room PL-401, 400 Seventh Street SW., 
    Washington, DC 20590-0001.
        (2) By hand delivery to room PL-401 on the Plaza level of the 
    Nassif Building, 400 Seventh Street SW., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. 
    and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The 
    telephone number is 202-366-9329.
        (3) By fax to Docket Management Facility at 202-493-2251.
        (4) Electronically through the Web Site for the Docket Management 
    System at http://dms.dot.gov.
        The Docket Management Facility maintains the public docket for this 
    rulemaking. Comments and material received from the public, as well as 
    documents indicated in this preamble as being available in the docket, 
    will become part of this docket and will be available for inspection or 
    copying at room PL-401 on the Plaza level of the Nassif Building at the 
    same address between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except 
    Federal holidays. You may also find this docket on the Internet at 
    http://dms.dot.gov.
        For questions on viewing or submitting material to the docket, call 
    Dorothy Walker, Chief, Dockets,
    
    [[Page 40332]]
    
    Department of Transportation, telephone 202-366-9329.
        Public Hearing: A public hearing will be chaired by a 
    representative of DOT at the West Wendover Library, Pilot Peak Room, 
    590 Camper Drive, West Wendover, Nevada, on Tuesday, August 10, 1999, 
    at 6:00 p.m. MDT/5:00 p.m. PDT. The hearing will be informal and will 
    be tape recorded for inclusion in the docket. Persons who desire to 
    express opinions or ask questions at the hearings do not have to sign 
    up in advance or give any prior notification. To the greatest extent 
    practicable, the DOT representative will provide an opportunity to 
    speak for all those wishing to do so.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joanne Petrie, Office of the Assistant 
    General Counsel for Regulation and Enforcement, U.S. Department of 
    Transportation, Room 10424, 400 Seventh Street, Washington, D.C. 20590, 
    (202) 366-9315; email address: joanne.petrie@ost.dot.gov.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    Background
    
        Under the Standard Time Act of 1918, as amended by the Uniform Time 
    Act of 1966 (15 U.S.C. 260-64), the Secretary of Transportation has 
    authority to issue regulations modifying the boundaries between time 
    zones in the United States in order to move an area from one time zone 
    to another. The standard in the statute for such decisions is ``regard 
    for the convenience of commerce and the existing junction points and 
    division points of common carriers engaged in interstate or foreign 
    commerce.''
    
    Petition for Rulemaking
    
        On January 8, 1999, Mayor Walter F. Sanders, Mayor of the City of 
    West Wendover, Nevada sent a letter to the Department of Transportation 
    asking the Department to change the city from the Pacific time zone to 
    the Mountain time zone. The letter noted the following facts in support 
    of its petition.
        1. West Wendover is located on the border of Utah and Nevada and is 
    directly adjacent to the City of Wendover, Utah, which is in the 
    Mountain time zone.
        2. It is more than one hundred miles to the nearest city.
        3. Businesses in West Wendover make most of their purchases from 
    Salt Lake City, which is in the Mountain time zone.
        4. The city receives all of its television and radio broadcasts 
    from Salt Lake City. Due to mountain ranges west of West Wendover, 
    radio broadcasts cannot be received from the Nevada area.
        5. West Wendover has one weekly local newspaper, which is printed 
    in Salt Lake City.
        6. The City of West Wendover currently has no passenger rail 
    service. The nearest public rail service is located in either Salt Lake 
    City, Utah or Elko, Nevada. Both cities are more than one hundred miles 
    from West Wendover.
        7. Greyhound buses travel through West Wendover on an east/west 
    run, but only stop in Wendover, Utah.
        8. Wendover, Utah has a small airport, which is limited to mostly 
    small private aircraft and which receives no commercial air service. 
    Tooele County, Utah, which is on Mountain time, is in the process of 
    renovating its airport. The closest major airport is Salt Lake City 
    International Airport.
        9. A small percentage of West Wendover's working population resides 
    outside the City limits. The majority of employed residents work in the 
    gaming/tourism industry.
        10. Medical services are currently provided by a local medical 
    clinic. The facility is owned by the City of West Wendover, which in 
    turn has leased the facility to the University of Utah--Medical 
    Facility. This agreement provided the opportunity for expanded medical 
    services to the community. Most residents of West Wendover travel to 
    Salt Lake City for major and routine health care.
        11. Secondary education is offered in Salt Lake City, Utah and 
    Elko, Nevada.
        12. West Wendover is in the process of expanding its recreation 
    facilities. These recreational services are designed to accommodate 
    people from the Wastach Front area, which is on Mountain time.
        13. West Wendover's residents must travel to Salt Lake City or Elko 
    in order to obtain a greater variety of services, shopping, and 
    recreation.
        14. The City of West Wendover is trying to purchase Air Force 
    property adjacent to the Tooele County Airport. This purchase is 
    expected to provide opportunities to establish a more diversified 
    economy within the Wendover/West Wendover community.
        15. Historically, West Wendover has always operated on Mountain 
    time. Prior to the 1980s, there was no reason to do otherwise because 
    there was literally nothing to the town fifty yards past the state 
    line. When West Wendover began to ``boom,'' the town tried to operate 
    by Pacific time. According to the Mayor, this action created mass 
    confusion for both residents and those outside the community.
        The Mayor stated that by allowing West Wendover to formally move 
    into the Mountain time zone, commerce within the Wendover/West Wendover 
    community would be facilitated and confusion would be eliminated.
        Under DOT procedures to change a time zone boundary, the Department 
    will generally begin a rulemaking proceeding if the highest elected 
    officials in the area make a prima facie case for the proposed change. 
    DOT has determined that the petition from the City of West Wendover 
    makes a prima facie case that warrants opening a proceeding to 
    determine whether the change should be made. Consequently, in this 
    notice of proposed rulemaking, DOT is proposing to make the requested 
    change and is inviting public comment.
        Although the City of West Wendover has submitted sufficient 
    information to begin the rulemaking process, the decision whether 
    actually to make the change will be based upon information received at 
    the hearing or submitted in writing to the docket. Persons supporting 
    or opposing the change should not assume that the change will be made 
    merely because DOT is making the proposal. We are not bound either to 
    accept or reject the proposal of the City of West Wendover at the 
    present time in the proceeding. The Department here issues no opinion 
    on the merits of the City's request. Our decision will be made on the 
    basis of information developed during the rulemaking proceeding.
    
    Impact on Observance of Daylight Saving Time
    
        This time zone proposal does not directly affect the observance of 
    daylight saving time. Under the Uniform Time Act of 1966, as amended, 
    the standard time of each time zone in the United States is advanced 
    one hour from 2:00 a.m. on the first Sunday in April until 2:00 a.m. on 
    the last Sunday in October, except in any State that has, by law, 
    exempted itself from this observance.
    
    Regulatory Analysis & Notices
    
        This proposed rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under 
    section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866 and does not require an 
    assessment of potential costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of 
    that Order. It has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and 
    Budget under that Order. It is not ``significant'' under the regulatory 
    policies and procedures of the Department of Transportation (DOT) (44 
    FR 11040; February 26, 1979). We expect the economic impact of this 
    proposed rule to be so minimal that a full Regulatory Evaluation under 
    paragraph 10e of the regulatory policies and procedures of DOT is 
    unnecessary.
    
    [[Page 40333]]
    
    The rule primarily affects the convenience of individuals in scheduling 
    activities. By itself, it imposes no direct costs. Its impact is 
    localized in nature.
    
    Small Entities
    
        Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we 
    considered whether this proposed rule would have a significant economic 
    impact on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small 
    entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations 
    that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their 
    fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 
    50,000. This proposal, if adopted, would primarily affect individuals 
    and their scheduling of activities. Although it would effect some small 
    businesses, not-for-profits and, the City of West Wendover, it would 
    not be a substantial number. In addition, the change should have 
    little, if any, economic impact.
        Therefore, the Office of the Secretary certifies under 5 U.S.C. 
    605(b) that this proposed rule would not have a significant economic 
    impact on a substantial number of small entities. If you think that 
    your business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction qualifies as 
    a small entity and that this rule would have a significant economic 
    impact on it, please submit a comment to the Docket Management Facility 
    at the address under ADDRESSES. In your comment, explain why you think 
    it qualifies and how and to what degree this rule would economically 
    affect it.
        Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 
    Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small 
    entities in understanding this proposed rule so that they can better 
    evaluate its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking. If the 
    rule would affect your small business, organization, or governmental 
    jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or 
    options for compliance, please call Joanne Petrie at (202) 366-9315.
    
    Collection of Information
    
        This proposed rule would call for no new collection of information 
    under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
    
    Federalism
    
        We have analyzed this proposed rule under E.O. 12612 and have 
    determined that this rule does not have sufficient implications for 
    federalism to warrant the preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
    
    Unfunded Mandates
    
        The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) and 
    E.O. 12875, Enhancing the Intergovernmental Partnership, (58 FR 58093; 
    October 28, 1993) govern the issuance of Federal regulations that 
    require unfunded mandates. An unfunded mandate is a regulation that 
    requires a State, local, or tribal government or the private sector to 
    incur direct costs without the Federal Government's having first 
    provided the funds to pay those costs. This proposed rule would not 
    impose an unfunded mandate.
    
    Taking of Private Property
    
        This proposed rule would not effect a taking of private property or 
    otherwise have taking implications under E.O. 12630, Governmental 
    Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property 
    Rights.
    
    Civil Justice Reform
    
        This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 
    3(b)(2) of E.O. 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation, 
    eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
    
    Protection of Children
    
        We have analyzed this proposed rule under E.O. 13045, Protection of 
    Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is 
    not an economically significant rule and does not concern an 
    environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may 
    disproportionately affect children.
    
    Environment
    
        This rulemaking is not a major Federal action significantly 
    affecting the quality of the human environment under the National 
    Environmental Policy Act and, therefore, an environmental impact 
    statement is not required.
    
    List of Subjects in 49 CFR Part 71
    
        Time zones.
        For the reasons discussed above, the Office of the Secretary 
    proposes to amend Title 49 Part 71 as follows:
    
    PART 71--[AMENDED]
    
        1. The authority citation for Part 71 would continue to read as 
    follows:
    
        Authority: Secs. 1-4, 40 Stat. 450, as amended; sec. 1, 41 Stat. 
    1446, as amended; secs. 2-7, 80 Stat. 107, as amended; 100 Stat. 
    764; Act of Mar. 19, 1918, as amended by the Uniform Time Act of 
    1966 and Pub. L. 97-449, 15 U.S.C. 260-267; Pub. L. 99-359; 49 CFR 
    159(a), unless otherwise noted.
    
        2. In Sec. 71.9 paragraph (b) would be revised to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 71.9  Boundary line between mountain and Pacific zones.
    
        (a) * * *
        (b) Utah-Nevada-Arizona-California. From the northeast corner of 
    the State of Nevada southerly along the Utah-Nevada boundary to the 
    junction with the northern border of the City of West Wendover, Utah. 
    Then westward along the northern, western, and southern boundaries of 
    the City of West Wendover back to the Utah-Nevada boundary. Then 
    southerly along the Utah-Nevada boundary, the Nevada-Arizona boundary, 
    and the Arizona-California boundary to the boundary between the United 
    States and Mexico.
    * * * * *
    
        Issued in Washington on July 12, 1999, under authority delegated 
    in 49 CFR Sec. 1.57(a).
    Rosalind Knapp,
    Acting General Counsel.
    [FR Doc. 99-19041 Filed 7-23-99; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-62-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
10/31/1999
Published:
07/26/1999
Department:
Transportation Department
Entry Type:
Proposed Rule
Action:
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
Document Number:
99-19041
Dates:
Comments should be received by September 24, 1999 to be assured of consideration. Comments received after that date will be considered to the extent practicable. If the time zone boundary is changed as a result of this rulemaking, the effective date would be 2:00 a.m. PDT Sunday, October 31, 1999.
Pages:
40331-40333 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
OST Docket No. OST-99-5947
RINs:
2105-AC82: Standard Time Zone Boundary in the State of Nevada: Proposed Relocation
RIN Links:
https://www.federalregister.gov/regulations/2105-AC82/standard-time-zone-boundary-in-the-state-of-nevada-proposed-relocation
PDF File:
99-19041.pdf
CFR: (1)
49 CFR 71.9