2023-15949. Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products From the Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2021-2022
-
Start Preamble
AGENCY:
Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY:
The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily determines that certain corrosion-resistant steel products (CORE) from the Republic of Korea (Korea) were not sold in the United States at less than normal value (NV) during the period of review (POR), July 1, 2021, through June 30, 2022. Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results.
DATES:
Applicable July 27, 2023.
Start Further InfoFOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jaron Moore or William Horn, AD/CVD Operations, Office VIII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–3640 or (202) 482–4868, respectively.
End Further Info End Preamble Start Supplemental InformationSUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On July 25, 2016, Commerce published the antidumping duty order on CORE from Korea.[1] Commerce initiated this administrative review on September 6, 2022.[2] This review covers eight companies,[3] of which we selected Dongkuk and Hyundai as mandatory respondents.[4]
On March 22, 2023, we extended the deadline for the preliminary results of this review until July 21, 2023.[5] For a detailed description of the events that followed the initiation of this review, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.[6]
Scope of the Order
The merchandise covered by the Order is CORE from Korea. For a complete description of the scope of the Order, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
Methodology
Commerce is conducting this administrative review in accordance with section 751(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). Export price and constructed export price are calculated in accordance with section 772 of the Act. NV is calculated in accordance with section 773 of the Act.
For a full description of the methodology underlying our conclusions, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. A list of topics discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is attached as an appendix to this notice. The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx.
Rate for Non-Examined Companies
The statute and Commerce's regulations do not address the establishment of a rate to be applied to companies not selected for individual examination when Commerce limits its examination in an administrative review pursuant to section 777A(c)(2) of the Act. Generally, Commerce looks to section 735(c)(5) of the Act, which provides instructions for calculating the all-others rate in an antidumping duty investigation, for guidance when calculating the rate for companies which were not selected for individual examination in an administrative review. Under section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act, the all-others rate is normally “an amount equal to the weighted average of the estimated weighted-average dumping margins established for exporters and producers individually investigated, excluding any zero and de minimis margins, and any margins determined entirely {on the basis of facts available}.”
However, where the dumping margins for individually examined respondents are all zero, de minimis, or based entirely on facts available, section 735(c)(5)(B) of the Act provides that Commerce may use “any reasonable method to establish the estimated all-others rate for exporters and producers not individually investigated, including averaging the estimated weighted-average dumping margins determined for the exporters and producers individually investigated.” In this review, we have calculated weighted-average dumping margins for both Dongkuk and Hyundai, the mandatory respondents, that are zero. Thus, using section 735(c)(5)(B) of the Act as guidance, we are assigning to the companies not selected for individual examination, the zero percent rate calculated for the mandatory respondents.
Preliminary Results
We preliminarily determine the following weighted-average dumping margins for the period July 1, 2021, through June 30, 2022:
Exporter/producer Weighted- average dumping margin (percent) Dongkuk Steel Mill Co., Ltd 0.00 Hyundai Steel Company 0.00 KG Dongbu Steel Co., Ltd 0.00 POSCO 0.00 POSCO International Corporation 0.00 POSCO STEELEON Co., Ltd 0.00 SeAH Coated Metal 0.00 Start Printed Page 48434 SeAH Steel Corporation 0.00 Disclosure and Public Comment
Commerce intends to disclose the calculations performed for these preliminary results of review to interested parties within five days of the date of publication of this notice in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).
Case briefs or other written comments may be submitted to the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Interested parties may submit case briefs to Commerce no later than 30 days after the date of publication of this notice.[7] Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised in the case briefs, may be filed no later than seven days after the date for filing case briefs.[8] Parties who submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this proceeding are encouraged to submit with each argument: (1) a statement of the issue; (2) a brief summary of the argument; and (3) a table of authorities.[9]
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to request a hearing must submit a written request to the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, filed electronically via Commerce's electronic records system, ACCESS, within 30 days after the date of publication of this notice.[10] Requests should contain: (1) the party's name, address and telephone number; (2) the number of participants; (3) whether any participant is a foreign national; and (4) a list of issues parties intend to discuss. Issues raised in the hearing will be limited to those raised in the respective case and rebuttal briefs. If a request for a hearing is made, Commerce intends to hold a hearing at a time and date to be determined.[11] Parties should confirm by telephone the date, time, and location of the hearing two days before the scheduled date.
All submissions to Commerce must be filed using ACCESS [12] and must be served on interested parties.[13] An electronically filed document must be received successfully in its entirety by Commerce's electronic records system, ACCESS, by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on the date that the document is due. Note that Commerce has temporarily modified certain of its requirements for serving documents containing business proprietary information, until further notice.[14]
Commerce intends to issue the final results of this administrative review, including the results of its analysis of the issues raised in any case or rebuttal briefs, no later than 120 days after the date of publication of this notice, unless this deadline is extended.[15]
Assessment Rates
Upon completion of the administrative review, Commerce shall determine, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries. For any individually examined respondent whose weighted-average dumping margin is not zero or de minimis ( i.e., less than 0.5 percent) in the final results of this review and the respondent reported entered values, we will calculate importer-specific ad valorem assessment rates for the merchandise based on the ratio of the total amount of dumping calculated for the examined sales made during the POR to each importer and the total entered value of those same sales, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). If the respondent has not reported entered values, we will calculate a per-unit assessment rate for each importer by dividing the total amount of dumping calculated for the examined sales made to that importer by the total quantity associated with those transactions. To determine whether an importer-specific, per-unit assessment rate is de minimis, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2), we also will calculate an importer-specific ad valorem ratio based on estimated entered values.
Where an importer-specific ad valorem assessment rate is zero or de minimis in the final results of review, we will instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties in accordance with 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2). If a respondent's weighted-average dumping margin is zero or de minimis in the final results of review, we will instruct CBP not to assess duties on any of its entries without regard to antidumping duties.[16]
In accordance with Commerce's “automatic assessment” practice, for entries of subject merchandise during the POR produced by any of the above-referenced respondents for which they did not know that the merchandise was destined for the United States, we will instruct CBP to liquidate those entries at the all-others rate in the original less-than-fair-value (LTFV) investigation (as amended) [17] if there is no rate for the intermediate company(ies) involved in the transaction.[18]
Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP no earlier than 35 days after the date of publication of the final results of this review in the Federal Register . If a timely summons is filed at the U.S. Court of International Trade, the assessment instructions will direct CBP not to liquidate relevant entries until the time for parties to file a request for a statutory injunction has expired ( i.e., within 90 days of publication).
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of the notice of final results of this administrative review for all shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of publication, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) the cash deposit rate for each specific company listed above will be that established in the final results of this review, except if the rate is less than 0.50 percent, and therefore, de minimis within the meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), in which case the cash deposit rate will be zero; (2) for previously investigated companies not participating in this review, the cash deposit will continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding in which the company participated; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this Start Printed Page 48435 review, or the underlying investigation, but the producer is, then the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recent segment for the producer of the merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other producers and exporters will continue to be 8.31 percent, the all-others rate established in the LTFV investigation (as amended).[19] These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this POR. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in Commerce's presumption that reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties, and/or increase in the amount of antidumping duties by the amount of the countervailing duties.
Notification to Interested Parties
We are issuing and publishing these results in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(4).
Start SignatureDated: July 20, 2023.
Lisa W. Wang,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Discussion of the Methodology
V. Currency Conversion
VI. Recommendation
End Supplemental InformationFootnotes
1. See Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from India, Italy, the People's Republic of China, the Republic of Korea and Taiwan: Amended Final Affirmative Antidumping Determination for India and Taiwan, and Antidumping Duty Orders,81 FR 48390 (July 25, 2016) ( Order); and Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from India, Italy, the People's Republic of China, the Republic of Korea, and Taiwan: Notice of Correction to the Antidumping Duty Orders,81 FR 58475 (August 25, 2016).
Back to Citation2. See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews,87 FR 54468 (September 6, 2022).
Back to Citation3. The eight companies are: Dongkuk Steel Mill Co., Ltd. (Dongkuk); Hyundai Steel Company (Hyundai); KG Dongbu Steel Co., Ltd.; POSCO; POSCO International Corporation; POSCO STEELEON CO., Ltd.; SeAH Coated Metal; and SeAH Steel Corporation.
Back to Citation4. See Memorandum, “Respondent Selection,” dated October 4, 2022.
Back to Citation5. See Memorandum, “Extension of Deadline for Preliminary Results of 2021–2022 Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,” dated March 22, 2023.
Back to Citation6. See Memorandum, “Decision Memorandum for Preliminary Results of the Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from the Republic of Korea; 2021–2022,” dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum).
Back to Citation8. See19 CFR 351.309(d)(1) and (2); see also Temporary Rule Modifying AD/CVD Service Requirements Due to COVID–19,85 FR 17006 (March 26, 2020) (“To provide adequate time for release of case briefs via ACCESS, E&C intends to schedule the due date for all rebuttal briefs to be 7 days after case briefs are filed (while these modifications remain in effect).”); and Temporary Rule Modifying AD/CVD Service Requirements Due to COVID 19; Extension of Effective Period,85 FR 41363 (July 10, 2020) (collectively, Temporary Rule).
Back to Citation9. See19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2).
Back to Citation10. See19 CFR 351.310(c).
Back to Citation11. See19 CFR 351.310(d).
Back to Citation12. See19 CFR 351.303.
Back to Citation13. See19 CFR 351.303(f).
Back to Citation14. See Temporary Rule.
Back to Citation15. See section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act; and 19 CFR 351.213(h).
Back to Citation16. See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Proceedings; Final Modification,77 FR 8101, 8102 (February 14, 2012) ( Final Modification for Reviews).
Back to Citation17. See Order; Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from the Republic of Korea: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony with Final Determination of Investigation and Notice of Amended Final Results,83 FR 39054 (August 8, 2018) ( Timken and Amended Final Results).
Back to Citation18. For a full discussion of this practice, see Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties,68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).
Back to Citation19. See Order, as amended by Timken and Amended Final Results.
Back to Citation[FR Doc. 2023–15949 Filed 7–26–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
Document Information
- Published:
- 07/27/2023
- Department:
- International Trade Administration
- Entry Type:
- Notice
- Document Number:
- 2023-15949
- Dates:
- Applicable July 27, 2023.
- Pages:
- 48433-48435 (3 pages)
- Docket Numbers:
- A-580-878
- PDF File:
- 2023-15949.pdf