94-18341. Arbitration Panel Decision Under the Randolph-Sheppard Act  

  • [Federal Register Volume 59, Number 144 (Thursday, July 28, 1994)]
    [Unknown Section]
    [Page ]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 94-18341]
    
    
    [Federal Register: July 28, 1994]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
    
    Arbitration Panel Decision Under the Randolph-Sheppard Act
    
    AGENCY: Department of Education.
    
    ACTION: Notice of Arbitration Panel Decision Under the Randolph-
    Sheppard Act.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that on March 22, 1991, an arbitration 
    panel rendered a decision in the matter of David Everett, Vendor, v. 
    State of Tennessee, Department of Human Services (Docket No. R-S/89-6). 
    This panel was convened by the Secretary of the Department of Education 
    pursuant to 20 U.S.C. 107d-2, upon receipt of a complaint filed by 
    petitioner David Everett.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: George F. Arsnow, U.S. Department of 
    Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, S.W., Room 3230, Switzer Building, 
    Washington, D.C. 20202-2738. Telephone: (202) 205-9317. Individuals who 
    use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) may call the TDD 
    number at 202-205-8298. A copy of the full text of the arbitration 
    panel decision may be obtained from this contact.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to the Randolph-Sheppard Act (20 
    U.S.C. 107d-2(c)), (the Act), the Secretary publishes a synopsis of 
    arbitration panel decisions affecting the administration of vending 
    facilities on Federal property.
    
    Background
    
        David Everett, complainant, is a blind vendor licensed by the 
    respondent, the Tennessee Department of Human Services (TDHS). Mr. 
    Everett signed an agreement with TDHS to operate vending machines 
    located in the County Building in Knoxville, Tennessee, on September 
    20, 1983.
        The State licensing agency (SLA), through its Department of 
    Rehabilitation, operates the Tennessee Vending Facility Program for 
    blind vendors. The purpose of the program is to establish and support 
    blind vendors operating vending facilities on State, local, and Federal 
    property. As the agency designated in Tennessee to carry out and manage 
    the vending facility program established by the Act, the SLA duly 
    promulgated rules and regulations to govern the State vending facility 
    program. These rules and regulations are comprehensive in scope. Based 
    on the State's Randolph-Sheppard rules and regulations governing its 
    program, Mr. Everett was required to make monthly income reports, 
    paying a set-aside fee based upon those monthly reports.
        On January 11, 1988, Mr. Everett's Business Enterprise Program 
    (BEP) counselor wrote him regarding his report and fees, advising him 
    that he had not filed reports for July through December, nor had he 
    paid his fees. Mr. Everett was given until January 25, 1988, to file 
    the reports or be recommended for probation. Mr. Everett did not 
    respond and, on February 1, 1988, was placed on probation. Mr. Everett 
    was given 30 days to comply with the requirements to file the reports 
    and pay the fees. Failure to do so would result in the termination of 
    his license. Mr. Everett again failed to respond to the probation 
    letter.
        On March 8, 1988, Mr. Everett received his letter of license 
    termination. This notification allowed Mr. Everett 30 additional days 
    to comply with the stated requirements. Mr. Everett attempted to comply 
    by mailing a certified check in the amount of $1,033 to the SLA and 
    agreed to mail the reports once corrections were made, even though the 
    reports would be a day late. After discussion with his BEP counselor, 
    Mr. Everett assumed this arrangement was satisfactory. However, his BEP 
    counselor stated that she had not agreed to this arrangement.
        On April 13, 1988, Mr. Everett was informed that his license was 
    terminated and that a final inventory would be made of his vending 
    machine facility. At this time he was notified that fees were 
    delinquent in the amount of $1,466.85.
        On May 10, 1988, Mr. Everett filed for an administrative review and 
    an evidentiary fair hearing of his termination. The SLA neither granted 
    nor denied the request for the administrative hearing but did proceed 
    with the evidentiary fair hearing.
        Mr. Everett sought financial relief for what he would have earned 
    had he not been terminated, reinstatement into the program, and 
    attorney's fees. The TDHS Commissioner denied relief on all grounds.
        Mr. Everett filed a complaint with the U.S. Department of Education 
    requesting arbitration regarding his termination. A hearing was 
    conducted September 21, 1990. 
    Arbitration Panel Decision 
        In the substantive issues in this case, the panel found that the 
    SLA was in error in terminating Mr. Everett's license because he had 
    made a good faith effort to pay his fees and file the report after 
    March 8, 1988.
        The panel concluded that Mr. Everett should be reinstated with back 
    pay to the program in a facility reasonably equivalent to the one he 
    left. Mr. Everett's testimony that he netted $1,500 a month was not 
    contradicted. However, because of his long-standing delinquency in 
    failing to file reports and pay his fees and his failure to make a more 
    timely response to the probation and termination letters, the panel 
    found that Mr. Everett is due less than a full award. The panel found 
    Mr. Everett was due back pay in the amount of $27,500, less fees he 
    owes the SLA in full and less his interim earnings in full. The panel 
    also concluded that attorney's fees may not be allowed.
        The panel member selected by the SLA filed a dissenting opinion in 
    which he maintained that the State was entitled to the sovereign 
    immunity embodied in the Eleventh Amendment to the United States 
    Constitution--an immunity the State did not waive by participating in 
    the Randolph-Sheppard program. This panelist concluded that the State 
    was, therefore, not liable for monetary damages.
        The views and opinions expressed by the panel do not necessarily 
    represent the views and opinions of the U.S. Department of Education.
    
         Dated: July 22, 1994. 
    Howard R. Moses, 
    Acting Assistant Secretary for the Office of Special Education and 
    Rehabilitative Services.
    [FR Doc. 94-18341 Filed 7-27-94; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4000-01-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
07/28/1994
Department:
Education Department
Entry Type:
Uncategorized Document
Action:
Notice of Arbitration Panel Decision Under the Randolph- Sheppard Act.
Document Number:
94-18341
Pages:
0-0 (None pages)
Docket Numbers:
Federal Register: July 28, 1994