94-18362. Airworthiness Directives; AlliedSignal Aerospace GTCP85 Series Auxiliary Power Units  

  • [Federal Register Volume 59, Number 144 (Thursday, July 28, 1994)]
    [Unknown Section]
    [Page ]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 94-18362]
    
    
    [Federal Register: July 28, 1994]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    
    Federal Aviation Administration
    
    14 CFR Part 39
    
    [Docket No. 94-ANE-17]
    
    
    Airworthiness Directives; AlliedSignal Aerospace GTCP85 Series 
    Auxiliary Power Units
    
    AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
    
    ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This document proposes the adoption of a new airworthiness 
    directive (AD) that is applicable to AlliedSignal Aerospace (formerly 
    Garrett Auxiliary Power Division and Garrett Turbine Engine Co.) GTCP85 
    series auxiliary power units (APU). This proposal would require 
    modifying the APU to install an exhaust centerbody. This proposal is 
    prompted by reports of two uncontained APU failures where turbine wheel 
    fragments exited the APU exhaust axially and damaged the aircraft. The 
    actions specified by the proposed AD are intended to prevent an axially 
    uncontained APU failure and damage to the aircraft.
    
    DATES: Comments must be received by September 26, 1994.
    
    ADDRESSES: Submit comments in triplicate to the Federal Aviation 
    Administration (FAA), New England Region, Office of the Assistant Chief 
    Counsel, Attention: Rules Docket No. 94-ANE-17, 12 New England 
    Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803-5299. Comments may be inspected at 
    this location between 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, 
    except Federal holidays.
        The service information referenced in the proposed rule may be 
    obtained from AlliedSignal Aerospace Services, P.O. Box 52170, Phoenix, 
    AZ 85072-2170, Attn. Dept. 65-71, Mailstop 1802-AA. This information 
    may be examined at the FAA, New England Region, Office of the Assistant 
    Chief Counsel, 12 New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Baitoo, Aerospace Engineer, Los 
    Angeles Aircraft Certification Office, FAA, Transport Airplane 
    Directorate, 3229 E. Spring St., Long Beach, CA 90806-2425; telephone 
    (310) 988-5245, fax (310) 988-5210.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    Comments Invited
    
        Interested persons are invited to participate in the making of the 
    proposed rule by submitting such written data, views, or arguments as 
    they may desire. Communications should identify the Rules Docket number 
    and be submitted in triplicate to the address specified above. All 
    communications received on or before the closing date for comments, 
    specified above, will be considered before taking action on the 
    proposed rule. The proposals contained in this notice may be changed in 
    light of the comments received.
        Comments are specifically invited on the overall regulatory, 
    economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the proposed rule. All 
    comments submitted will be available, both before and after the closing 
    date for comments, in the Rules Docket for examination by interested 
    persons. A report summarizing each FAA-public contact concerned with 
    the substance of this proposal will be filed in the Rules Docket.
        Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments 
    submitted in response to this notice must submit a self-addressed, 
    stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments 
    to Docket Number 94-ANE-17.'' The postcard will be date stamped and 
    returned to the commenter.
    
    Availability of NPRMs
    
        Any person may obtain a copy of this NPRM by submitting a request 
    to the FAA, New England Region, Office of the Assistant Chief Counsel, 
    Attention: Rules Docket No. 94-ANE-17, 12 New England Executive Park, 
    Burlington, MA 01803-5299.
    
    Discussion
    
        Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has received reports of two 
    incidents where AlliedSignal Aerospace (formerly Garrett Auxiliary 
    Power Division and Garrett Turbine Engine Co.) GTCP85 series auxiliary 
    power units (APU) experienced uncontained failures. In both incidents, 
    the APU turbine wheel fragments exited the APU exhaust axially and 
    damaged the aircraft while on the ground. The FAA has determined that 
    this failure mode is a potential safety hazard both on the ground and 
    in flight, as the APU can release turbine wheel fragments that can 
    penetrate the aircraft APU exhaust duct and cause damage to other 
    aircraft systems. In addition, the hot turbine wheel fragments can pose 
    a fire hazard. This condition, if not corrected, could result in an 
    axially uncontained APU failure and damage to the aircraft.
        FAA has reviewed and approved the technical contents of 
    AlliedSignal Aerospace Service Bulletin (SB) No. GTCP85-49-A6831, dated 
    March 17, 1994, applicable to APU's installed on McDonnell Douglas DC-
    9/MD-80 series aircraft, and SB No. GTCP85-49-6919, dated May 17, 1994, 
    applicable to APU's installed on several other aircraft makes and 
    models. These SB's describe procedures for modifying the APU to install 
    an exhaust centerbody.
        Since an unsafe condition has been identified that is likely to 
    exist or develop on other products of this same type design, the 
    proposed AD would require modifying the APU to install an exhaust 
    centerbody to contain turbine wheel fragments from exiting the APU 
    axially. Due to the increased risk associated with airborne failures, 
    flight operable APU's would be required to be modified within 24 months 
    after the effective date of the AD, and within 36 months after the 
    effective date of this AD for APU's that are ground operable only. The 
    actions would be required to be accomplished in accordance with the 
    service bulletins described previously.
        There are approximately 3,000 APU's of the affected design in the 
    worldwide fleet. The FAA estimates that 1,500 APU's installed on 
    aircraft of U.S. registry would be affected by this proposed AD, that 
    it would take approximately 5 work hours per APU to accomplish the 
    proposed actions, and that the average labor rate is $55 per work hour. 
    Required parts would cost approximately $7,055 per APU if the exhaust 
    duct is not reworkable, $3,254 per APU if the exhaust duct is 
    reworkable, and the FAA estimates that 1,050 domestic APU's are 
    reworkable. Based on these figures, the total cost impact of the 
    proposed AD on U.S. operators is estimated to be $7,003,950.
        The regulations proposed herein would not have substantial direct 
    effects on the States, on the relationship between the national 
    government and the States, or on the distribution of power and 
    responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in 
    accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this 
    proposal would not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant 
    the preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
        For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this proposed 
    regulation (1) is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under 
    Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT 
    Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); 
    and (3) if promulgated, will not have a significant economic impact, 
    positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under 
    the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. A copy of the draft 
    regulatory evaluation prepared for this action is contained in the 
    Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained by contacting the Rules 
    Docket at the location provided under the caption ADDRESSES.
    
    List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
    
        Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety. The Proposed 
    Amendment
    
        Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the 
    Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration proposes to amend 
    part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as 
    follows:
    
    PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
    
        1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 49 U.S.C. App. 1354(a), 1421 and 1423; 49 U.S.C. 
    106(g); and 14 CFR 11.89.
    
    
    Sec. 39.13  [AMENDED]
    
        2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new 
    airworthiness directive:
    
    AlliedSignal Aerospace: Docket No. 94-ANE-17.
    
        Applicability: AlliedSignal Aerospace (formerly Garrett 
    Auxiliary Power Division and Garrett Turbine Engine Co.) GTCP85 
    series auxiliary power units (APU's) installed on but not limited to 
    British Aerospace BAC 1-11 series aircraft; Boeing 707 series 
    aircraft, 727 series aircraft, 737 series aircraft; Lockheed L382 
    series aircraft; McDonnell Douglas DC-8-70 series aircraft, and DC-
    9/MD-80 series aircraft.
        Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished 
    previously.
        To prevent an uncontained APU failure and damage to the 
    aircraft, accomplish the following:
        (a) For flight-operable APU's, within 24 months after the 
    effective date of this airworthiness directive (AD), install an 
    exhaust centerbody in accordance with AlliedSignal Aerospace Service 
    Bulletin (SB) No. GTCP85-49-A6831, dated March 17, 1994, or SB No. 
    GTCP85-49-6919, dated May 17, 1994, as applicable.
        (b) For APU's that are ground-operable only, within 36 months 
    after the effective date of this AD, install an exhaust centerbody 
    in accordance with AlliedSignal Aerospace SB No. GTCP85-49-6919, 
    dated May 17, 1994.
        (c) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the 
    compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be 
    used if approved by the Manager, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification 
    Office. The request should be forwarded through an appropriate FAA 
    Principal Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send 
    it to the Manager, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office.
    
        Note: Information concerning the existence of approved 
    alternative methods of compliance with this airworthiness directive, 
    if any, may be obtained from the Los Angeles Aircraft Certification 
    Office.
    
        (d) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with 
    sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 
    CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the aircraft to a location where 
    the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
    
        Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on July 21, 1994.
    Jay J. Pardee,
    Manager, Engine and Propeller Directorate,
    Aircraft Certification Service.
    [FR Doc. 94-18362 Filed 7-27-94; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
07/28/1994
Department:
Federal Aviation Administration
Entry Type:
Uncategorized Document
Action:
Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
Document Number:
94-18362
Dates:
Comments must be received by September 26, 1994.
Pages:
0-0 (None pages)
Docket Numbers:
Federal Register: July 28, 1994, Docket No. 94-ANE-17
CFR: (1)
14 CFR 39.13