94-18365. Accuride Corporation; Receipt of Petition for Determination of Inconsequential Noncompliance  

  • [Federal Register Volume 59, Number 144 (Thursday, July 28, 1994)]
    [Unknown Section]
    [Page ]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 94-18365]
    
    
    [Federal Register: July 28, 1994]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    [Docket No. 94-64; Notice 1]
    
    
    Accuride Corporation; Receipt of Petition for Determination of 
    Inconsequential Noncompliance
    
        The Accuride Corporation (Accuride) of Henderson, Kentucky, has 
    determined that some of its wheels fail to comply with 49 CFR 571.120, 
    Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No. 120, ``Tire Selection 
    and Rims for Vehicles Other Than Passenger Cars,'' and has filed an 
    appropriate report pursuant to 49 CFR Part 573, ``Defect and 
    Noncompliance Reports.'' Accuride has also petitioned to be exempted 
    from the notification and remedy requirements of 49 U.S.C. Chapter 
    301--``Motor Vehicle Safety'' on the basis that the noncompliance is 
    inconsequential as it relates to motor vehicle safety.
        This notice of receipt of a petition is published under 49 U.S.C. 
    30118 and 30120 (formerly Section 157 of the National Traffic and Motor 
    Vehicle Safety Act (15 U.S.C. 1417)) and does not represent any agency 
    decision or other exercise of judgement concerning the merits of the 
    petition.
        FMVSS No. 120, Paragraph S5.2(b) requires that each wheel be marked 
    with the rim size designation.
        On January 11, 1994, Accuride produced an estimated 103 Accu-Forge 
    22.5  x  9.00 inch, 15 degree drop center, one-piece tubeless dual 
    wheels with incorrect size designations for the rim width. The wheels 
    were incorrectly stamped ``22.5  x  8.25.'' The wheels should have been 
    stamped ``22.5  x  9.00.'' All other stampings and markings required by 
    FMVSS No. 120 are correctly identified on each of the subject wheels.
        Accuride supports its petition for inconsequential noncompliance 
    with the following:
    
        Accuride has fully analyzed the issues surrounding the incorrect 
    width designation on these wheels and has sought the input of the 
    others with particular expertise on this subject. Based upon all of 
    this analysis and the information obtained, it appears clear that 
    there is no safety-related issue potentially arising from the 
    incorrect width designations indicated on the wheels.
        According to the 1994 Tire and Rim Association Yearbook, the 
    permissible tires on a 22.5  x  9.00 inch rim are the 295/75*22.5 
    and the 12*22.5. The permissible tires for use on a 22.5 x 8.25 inch 
    rim are the 265/75*22.5, 295/75*22.5, 11*22.5, and the 12*22.5 size. 
    Because the 12*22.5 and the 295/75*22.5 tires are acceptable on both 
    the 8.25 inch and 9.00 inch rims, these tire combinations are not of 
    concern. The remaining 11*22.5 and 265/75*22.5 tires that are 
    specified only for the 8.25 inch rim have been given particular 
    attention. Acccuride has carefully evaluated all of the issues 
    surrounding the possible effect of use of such tires on a wider 9.00 
    inch rim. We have also solicited the input of two major tire 
    manufacturers and specifically inquired as to potential negative 
    effects of such usage. Our analysis, as well as that of the tire 
    manufacturers, is that there is no safety-related issue. Load 
    carrying capacities, air retention, handling characteristics, and 
    other aspects of performance will not be affected to any degree 
    significant to motor vehicle safety. The only potential effect of 
    such usage results from the fact that the tires in question are 
    slightly more spread on the wider 9.00 inch rim resulting in some 
    chance of reduction in tread wear to a minor degree.
        It should also be pointed out that the 22.5  x  9.00 inch size 
    is generally a special application tire and wheel combination 
    typically used in North America only on fleets requiring a 
    particular larger tire for the needs of their operation. The wheel 
    in question is heavier and more expensive than a standard 8.25 inch 
    wheel, and these fleets use the product because of specific higher 
    load requirements and would also use the larger tire to meet those 
    same requirements. It is, therefore, Accuride's conclusion that the 
    possibility that narrower tires would be used on these wheels is 
    extremely remote.
    
        Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and 
    arguments on the petition of Accuride, described above. Comments should 
    refer to the docket number and be submitted to: Docket Section, 
    National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Room 5109, 400 Seventh 
    Street, SW., Washington, D.C., 20590. It is requested but not required 
    that six copies be submitted.
        All comments received before the close of business on the closing 
    date indicated below will be considered. The application and supporting 
    materials, and all comments received after the closing date, will also 
    be filed and will be considered to the extent possible. When the 
    petition is granted or denied, the notice will be published in the 
    Federal Register pursuant to the authority indicated below.
        Comment closing date: August 29, 1994.
    
    (49 U.S.C. 30118, 30120; delegations of authority at 49 CFR 1.50 and 
    49 CFR 501.8).
    
        Issued on: July 21, 1994.
    Barry Felrice,
    Associate Administrator for Rulemaking.
    [FR Doc. 94-18365 Filed 7-27-94; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-59-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
07/28/1994
Department:
Transportation Department
Entry Type:
Uncategorized Document
Document Number:
94-18365
Dates:
August 29, 1994.
Pages:
0-0 (None pages)
Docket Numbers:
Federal Register: July 28, 1994, Docket No. 94-64, Notice 1