95-18622. Environmental Impact Statements and Regulations; Availability of EPA Comments  

  • [Federal Register Volume 60, Number 145 (Friday, July 28, 1995)]
    [Notices]
    [Page 38816]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 95-18622]
    
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    [ER-FRL-4725-3]
    
    
    Environmental Impact Statements and Regulations; Availability of 
    EPA Comments
    
        Availability of EPA comments prepared June 19, 1995 Through June 
    23, 1995 pursuant to the Environmental Review Process (ERP), under 
    Section 309 of the Clean Air Act and Section 102(2)(c) of the National 
    Environmental Policy Act as amended. Requests for copies of EPA 
    comments can be directed to the Office of Federal Activities at (202) 
    260-5076.
        An explanation of the ratings assigned to draft environmental 
    impact statements (EISs) was published in FR dated April 14, 1995 (60 
    FR 19047).
    
    Draft EISs
    
        ERP No. D-FHW-E40759-AL Rating EC2, Birmingham Northern Beltline 
    Project, Construction, I-59/20 west to I-59 northeast in the City of 
    Birmingham, Funding and Possible COE Section 404 Permit, Jefferson 
    County, AL.
    
    Summary
    
        EPA's review revealed that all of the alternatives will impact 
    environmental resources in the highway corridor; additional information 
    on wetlands mitigation was requested.
        ERP No. D-GSA-D81026-MD Rating EC2, Food and Drug Administration 
    Consolidation, Site Selection, Montgomery County Campus, Montgomery and 
    Prince Georges Counties, MD.
    
    Summary
    
        EPA expressed environmental concerns regarding the air analysis for 
    the and storm water management facilities. EPA requested that these 
    issues be clarified in the final EIS.
        ERP No. D-SFW-K99026-CA Rating LO, Multiple Species Conservation 
    Program Planning Area, Issuance of a Permit to Allow Incidental Take of 
    Threatened and Endangered Species, San Diego County, CA.
    
    Summary
    
        EPA expressed a lack of objections with the draft EIS and the 
    proposed action.
        ERP No. D-USN-E11036-FL Rating EC2, Naval Training Center Orlando 
    Disposal and Reuse, Implementation, Orange County, FL.
    
    Summary
    
        EPA had environmental concerns on the lack of information 
    concerning radiological issues; wetlands impacts and mitigation; and 
    air quality monitoring and control measures.
        ERP No. D-USN-K11062-CA Rating EC2, San Diego Homeporting 
    Facilities Construction and Operation to Support Berthing One NIMITZ 
    Class Aircraft Carrier, Implementation, San Diego County, CA.
    
    Summary
    
        EPA requested additional information and clarification on the 
    disturbance, dredging, disposal of contaminated and non-contaminated 
    sediment, biological resource issues, and human health and safety 
    issues.
        ERP No. DA-AFS-L65147-AK Rating EC2, Bohemia Mountain Timber Sale, 
    Updated Information concerning Resolution of Three Appeal Issues 
    Regarding Harvesting Timber, Tongass National Forest, Stikine Area, AK.
    
    Summary
    
        EPA expressed environmental concerns regarding water quality and 
    fisheries impacts. Additional information is needed on monitoring. EPA 
    requested more information on these issues and also recommended that a 
    detailed water quality monitoring plan be presented.
        ERP No. DS-COE-E01002-NC Rating EC2, Texasgulf Open Pit Mine 
    Continuation, Construction and Operation, Additional Information 
    Concerning Alternative E for Wetland Avoidance/Minimization, Permit 
    Approval, Pamlico River, Aurora, Beaufort County, NC.
    
    Summary
    
        EPA had environmental concerns over potential impacts to wetlands, 
    and suggested modifications to further reduce impact to wetlands.
    
    Final EISs
    
        ERP No. F-USN-D11023-MD, Naval Air Warfare Center Aircraft 
    Division, Base Realignment and Construction, Patuxent River, St. 
    Mary's, Calvert and Charles Counties, MD.
    
    Summary
    
        The final EIS adequately addressed EPA's earlier concerns.
    
    Regulations
    
        ERP No. R-AFS-A65160-00, 36 CFR Parts 215, 217 and 219 National 
    Forest System Land and Resource Management Planning.
    
    Summary
    
        While EPA believed that the proposed rule is an improvement, it 
    expressed concern regarding the implementation of ecosystem management 
    and criteria for ecosystem sustainability, diminished public 
    participation and resource protection issues.
    
        Dated: July 25, 1995.
    William D. Dickerson,
    Director, Office of Federal Activities.
    [FR Doc. 95-18622 Filed 7-27-95; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6560-50-U
    
    

Document Information

Published:
07/28/1995
Department:
Environmental Protection Agency
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
95-18622
Pages:
38816-38816 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
ER-FRL-4725-3
PDF File:
95-18622.pdf