94-18553. National Environmental Policy Act: Agency Procedures for Categorical Exclusions  

  • [Federal Register Volume 59, Number 145 (Friday, July 29, 1994)]
    [Unknown Section]
    [Page 0]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 94-18553]
    
    
    [[Page Unknown]]
    
    [Federal Register: July 29, 1994]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    
    Coast Guard
    [CGD 93-090]
    
     
    
    National Environmental Policy Act: Agency Procedures for 
    Categorical Exclusions
    
    AGENCY: Coast Guard, DOT.
    
    ACTION: Notice of final agency procedures and policy for categorical 
    exclusions.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is revising its procedures and policies 
    concerning agency actions which do not individually or cumulatively 
    have a significant effect on the human environment. Under the National 
    Environmental Policy Act, these actions are categorically excluded from 
    the requirement that the proposed action undergo the additional 
    analysis that accompanies preparation of an Environmental Assessment or 
    an Environmental Impact Statement. This revision eliminates overly 
    expansive and inconsistent interpretations of existing policies and 
    procedures, aligns them with Categorical Exclusions of other agencies, 
    reduces paperwork and delays, and produces better decision processes.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
    Ms. Bonnie Gallahan, Environmental Compliance and Restoration Branch 
    (G-ECV-1B), (202) 267-6034).
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    Background and Purpose
    
        Under regulations implementing the National Environmental Policy 
    Act (NEPA) (40 CFR parts 1500 through 1508), each Federal agency is 
    required to adopt procedures to supplement those regulations (40 CFR 
    1507.3). The Coast Guard's procedures and policies are published as a 
    Commandant instruction entitled ``National Environmental Policy Act 
    Implementing Procedures and Policy for Considering Environmental 
    Impacts'' (COMDTINST M16475.1 series). In this notice, the Coast Guard 
    is announcing the revision of section 2.B.2. of the instruction 
    concerning Categorical Exclusions (CE). CEs are those categories of 
    actions which may be taken by the Coast Guard without the analysis and 
    documentation required for an Environmental Assessment (EA) or an 
    Environmental Impact Statement (EIS).
        This is a complete revision of the instructions on CEs. It 
    identifies the categories subject to exclusion with greater precision 
    (paragraph 2.B.2.e), it provides criteria for screening an action which 
    falls under an excluded category but which might otherwise warrant 
    additional environmental review (paragraph 2.B.2.b), and it adds 
    procedures for identifying new categories for future CEs (paragraph 
    2.B.2.a).
    
    Discussion of Comments and Changes
    
        The revision was published as a proposal for public review and 
    comment under 40 CFR 1507.3, after consultation with the Council on 
    Environmental Quality (CEQ), in 59 FR 3152 through 3155 (January 20, 
    1994). Comments were received from two private individuals, an industry 
    group, a State agency and a Federal agency.
        The comments focused on documentation requirements (preparation of 
    an environmental analysis checklists or Categorical Exclusion 
    Determination (CED)). The suggestions fell into two groups, some 
    suggested the elimination of all documentation requirements and others 
    requested requiring checklists and CEDs for all CEs. In keeping with 
    the spirit and intent of NEPA, the CEQ regulations, and Executive 
    Orders 11514 and 11991, this revision is intended ``to reduce paperwork 
    and the accumulation of extraneous background data.'' Consequently, the 
    requirement to complete and submit environmental checklists has been 
    minimized. Future revisions will address the possibility of further 
    reducing the number of CEs requiring checklists. The section on 
    documentation (section 2.B.2.c.) has also been revised to clarify the 
    situations when a Categorical Exclusion Determination (CED) is 
    required. The CED requirement for regulations is consistent with the 
    COMDTINST provision (section 2.A.3.) that requires documentation for 
    Coast Guard regulatory actions.
        Several comments received focused on either expanding or limiting 
    the situations in which use of a CE would be appropriate. Many such 
    comments were considered unnecessary because the list of CEs (section 
    2.B.2.e.) can only be applied in conjunction with the limitations 
    (section 2.B.2.b.). For example, complying with current Federal, State, 
    or local laws or requirements is specified in the limitations section 
    and not repeated in every CE. In the same way, cumulative and 
    incremental impacts or effects must be considered when determining 
    whether the limitation in subsection 2.B.2.b.(6) precludes application 
    of a CE to a specific action.
        The section describing compliance with other laws (section 
    2.B.2.d.) has, in consideration of comments received from the 
    Department of the Interior, been expanded to include requirements set 
    forth in agreements. Therefore, Coast Guard personnel are responsible 
    for ensuring compliance with any Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) or 
    Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with other agencies or entities.
        Additional revisions to specific CEs are as follows:
        CE (1): ``Training'' was eliminated from the types of actions 
    listed here because it created the possibility of confusion and 
    ambiguity due to its redundant nature with CEs (18) through (21) which 
    specifically cover training activities.
        CE (12): The checklist requirement was kept for vessels and 
    aircraft to insure major disposal actions receive additional attention. 
    This is one example of a category requiring an environmental analysis 
    checklist that will be addressed in future revisions.
        CE (13): This was clarified to address situations where the 
    National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) section 106 process 
    determines there is no effect. This CE may still be used if there is a 
    consensus that no impact will occur. Furthermore, the limitation set 
    out in 2.B.2.b.(7) reinforces the requirement to comply with the NHPA.
        CE (18): Comments questioned the proposed revision's clarity in 
    requiring NEPA compliance by lead agencies. This final revision makes 
    it clear that the lead agency must meet its NEPA requirements prior to 
    Coast Guard participation in defense preparedness training and 
    exercises.
        CE (23): The words ``and the Aids to Navigation Program'' were 
    added to address concerns that the original proposal would not 
    encompass the placing of aids to navigation by private parties under 
    the Coast Guard Aids to Navigation Program. As revised, this CE 
    includes and treats privately placed aids in the same manner as aids 
    placed by the Coast Guard.
        CE (32): Comments received regarding the provision for the Bridges 
    Program expressed concern regarding the lack of reference to carrying 
    capacity and the exclusion of ``bridges with historic significance or 
    bridges providing access to undeveloped barrier islands and beaches.'' 
    The exclusion was explicitly stated to focus attention on two issues 
    that arise on a recurring basis. The sections describing limitations on 
    the use of CEs require the parties responsible for environmental 
    analysis and documentation to consider, pursuant to section 
    2.B.2.b.(2), the unique characteristics of the geographic area, such as 
    proximity to historic or cultural resources, wetlands, and ecologically 
    critical areas. Section 2.B.2.b(7) requires consideration of the 
    effects on structures that are listed in, or eligible for listing in, 
    the National Register of Historic Places or that may cause loss or 
    destruction of significant cultural or historical resources. Use of the 
    limitations section also addresses the concern over incremental changes 
    that involve carrying capacity. Specifically, the limitation on 
    ``individually insignificant, but cumulatively significant, impact'' 
    (2.B.2.b.(6)), in conjunction with the requirements that all NEPA 
    analyses consider connected, cumulative, and similar actions (50 CFR 
    1508.25) and direct, indirect, and cumulative effects (50 CFR 1508.7 
    and 1508.8) ensure that carrying capacity will be considered.
        CE (34): The Advanced Notice of Proposed Rule Making and Interim 
    Rule are added to the list of regulatory actions requiring completion 
    of an Environmental Analysis Checklist and preparation of a CED, 
    because completion of the CE process applies to all regulatory actions. 
    New subsections (a) through (e) were included in proposed subsection 
    (a), the general description of editorial, procedural, or 
    administrative regulations. The new subsections more clearly delineate 
    and describe the types of regulations that qualify for CEs. New 
    subsections (f) and (g) are revisions of subsections (b) and (c). The 
    requirement to prepare a checklist unless the size of the Area, ground, 
    or zone is being increased has been eliminated. Furthermore, subsection 
    (g) has been revised to explicitly refer to Regulated Navigation Areas 
    (RNAs) which are promulgated under 33 CFR part 165. In addition, no 
    documentation is required for temporary areas or zones that are of 
    limited duration and that were established to deal with emergency 
    situations. New subsection (i), a revision of proposed subsection (e), 
    uses the term ``rules of the road'' to include Shipping Safety Fairways 
    promulgated under 33 CFR part 166 and International Regulations for the 
    Prevention of Collisions at Sea (COLREGS) established under the 
    auspices of the International Maritime Organization.
        CE (35): Several comments concerned the regatta and marine parade 
    permit provisions. The comments suggested changes ranging from greatly 
    expanding the actions qualifying for the CE to drastically contracting 
    the actions. The provision, as proposed, reflected the need to strike a 
    balance in favor of a CE that recognizes current experience and 
    provides flexibility to field units and commanders issuing the permits. 
    It allows field units and commanders to assess the impacts based upon 
    site-specific circumstances, such as the characteristics of the body of 
    water, the proximity to environmentally sensitive areas, and the actual 
    numbers of participants and spectators involved. The CEs, when read and 
    applied in conjunction with the limitations section, the statute, the 
    CEQ regulations, provide reasonable parameters. Therefore, the 
    provision as drafted is unchanged.
        For the reasons set out in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 
    section 2.B.2. of COMDTINST M16475.1B as follows:
        2.B. Environmental Documentation.
    * * * * *
        2. Categorical Exclusions (CE).
    
    a. Introduction
    
        As defined by the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ), a 
    ``categorical exclusion'' or ``CE'' means a category of actions which 
    do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the 
    human environment and for which, therefore, neither an Environmental 
    Assessment (EA) nor an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is 
    required. The use of a CE is intended to reduce paperwork and delay by 
    eliminating the unnecessary preparation of EAs and EISs. The CEs listed 
    below are subject to review and any suggested modifications should be 
    provided to COMDT (G-ECV). Additional CEs should be suggested when it 
    becomes clear, through the preparation of EAs, that Findings of No 
    Significant Impact (FONSI) result after numerous analyses of similar 
    types of actions.
    
    b. Limitations on Using Categorical Exclusions
    
        Some actions that normally would be categorically excluded under 
    section 2.B.2.e. could require additional environmental review and, for 
    this reason, responsible personnel should be alert for circumstances 
    that dictate the need to prepare an EA or EIS.
        A determination of whether an action that is normally excluded 
    requires additional review must focus on the action's significance. The 
    proposed action must be evaluated in its context (whether local, State, 
    regional, tribal, national, or international) and in its intensity by 
    considering whether the action is likely to involve one or more of the 
    following:
        (1) An adverse effect on public health or safety.
        (2) A site that includes or is near a unique characteristic of the 
    geographic area, such as a historic or cultural resource, park land, 
    prime farmland, wetland, wild and scenic river, ecologically critical 
    area, or property requiring special consideration under 49 U.S.C. 
    303(c). [Section 303(c) of Title 49 U.S.C. is commonly referred to as 
    section 4(f) of the Department of Transportation (DOT) Act which 
    includes any land from a public park, recreation area, wildlife and 
    waterfowl refuge, or historic site].
        (3) An effect on the quality of the human environment that is 
    likely to be highly controversial, in terms of scientific validity or 
    public opinion.
        (4) An effect on the human environment that is highly uncertain or 
    involves unique or unknown risks.
        (5) A precedent for future actions with significant effects or a 
    decision in principle about a future consideration.
        (6) An individually insignificant, but cumulatively significant, 
    impact when considered along with other past, present, and reasonably 
    foreseeable future actions.
        (7) An adverse effect on a district, site, highway, structure, or 
    object that is listed in or eligible for listing in the National 
    Register of Historic Places, or the loss or destruction of a 
    significant scientific, cultural, or historical resource.
        (8) An adverse effect on species or habitats protected by the 
    Endangered Species Act.
        (9) A potential or threatened violation of a Federal, State, or 
    local law or requirement imposed for the protection of the environment.
        (10) An impact that may be both beneficial and adverse. A 
    significant impact may exist even if it is believed that, on balance, 
    the effect will be beneficial.
        In addition, a CE may not be used if the proposed action is likely 
    to involve any of the circumstances set forth in section 20.b.(2) of 
    DOT Order 5610.1 series (Enclosure 1). The ten listed circumstances and 
    those in the DOT Order are addressed in the Environmental Analysis 
    Checklist (Enclosure 10).
        If a CE is not appropriate, an EA or an EIS must be prepared.
    
    c. Documentation
    
        When the specific CE requires that a checklist be completed, an 
    environmental analysis checklist (Enclosure 10) will be completed and 
    used to substantiate the use of the CE. The checklist must be submitted 
    with, and accompany, the proposal for the action. If a CE is not 
    appropriate, the environmental analysis checklist will be used for 
    developing an EA or EIS.
        A written Categorical Exclusion Determination (CED) (Enclosure 6) 
    must be prepared when a CE is being relied upon to promulgate a 
    regulation that requires an environmental checklist.
        Checklists and CEDs supplementary to the requirements of this 
    Instruction may be developed by subordinate commands for specific types 
    of actions. Those documents must be approved by G-ECV before they are 
    adopted for use.
    
    d. Compliance With Other Laws and Requirements
    
        Even though an EA or EIS may not be indicated for a Federal action 
    because of a CE, that fact does not exempt the action from compliance 
    with any other Federal law or any review or consultation requirements 
    contained in any applicable agreement. For example, compliance with the 
    Endangered Species Act, the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act, the 
    National Historic Preservation Act, the Clean Water Act, the Clean Air 
    Act (conformity requirements), etc. is always mandatory, even for 
    actions that do not require an EA or EIS.
    
    e. Categorical Exclusion List
    
        The following are actions that, unless consideration of the factors 
    in section 2.B.2.b. trigger the need to conduct further analysis, are 
    categorically excluded from further analysis and documentation 
    requirements under NEPA. (Note: Unless otherwise indicated, completion 
    of an environmental checklist (Enclosure 10) and preparation of a CED 
    (Enclosure 6) is not required):
        (1) Routine personnel, fiscal, and administrative activities, 
    actions, procedures, and policies which clearly do not have any 
    environmental impacts, such as military and civilian personnel 
    recruiting, processing, paying, and recordkeeping.
        (2) Routine procurement activities and actions for goods and 
    services, including office supplies, equipment, mobile assets, and 
    utility services for routine administration, operation, and 
    maintenance.
        (3) Maintenance dredging and debris disposal where no new depths 
    are required, applicable permits are secured, and disposal will be at 
    an existing approved disposal site. (Checklist required).
        (4) Routine repair, renovation, and maintenance actions on aircraft 
    and vessels.
        (5) Routine repair and maintenance of buildings, roads, airfields, 
    grounds, equipment, and other facilities which do not result in a 
    change in functional use, or an impact on a historically significant 
    element or setting.
        (6) Minor renovations and additions to buildings, roads, airfields, 
    grounds, equipment, and other facilities which do not result in a 
    change in functional use, a historically significant element, or 
    historically significant setting. (Checklist required).
        (7) Routine repair and maintenance to waterfront facilities, 
    including mooring piles, fixed floating piers, existing piers, and 
    unburied power cables.
        (8) Minor renovations and additions to waterfront facilities, 
    including mooring piles, fixed floating piers, existing piers, and 
    unburied power cables, which do not require special, site-specific 
    regulatory permits. (Checklist required).
        (9) Routine grounds maintenance and activities at units and 
    facilities. Examples include localized pest management actions and 
    actions to maintain improved grounds (such as landscaping, lawn care 
    and minor erosion control measures) that are conducted in accordance 
    with applicable Federal, State and local directives.
        (10) Installation of devices to protect human or animal life, such 
    as raptor electrocution prevention devices, fencing to restrict 
    wildlife movement on to airfields, and fencing and grating to prevent 
    accidental entry to hazardous areas. (Checklist required).
        (11) New construction on heavily developed portions of Coast Guard 
    property, when construction, use, and operation will comply with 
    regulatory requirements and constraints. (Checklist required).
        (12) Decisions to decommission equipment or temporarily discontinue 
    use of facilities or equipment. This does not preclude the need to 
    review decommissioning under section 106 of the National Historic 
    Preservation Act. (Checklist required for vessels and aircraft).
        (13) Demolition or disposal actions that involve buildings or 
    structures when conducted in accordance with regulations applying to 
    removal of asbestos, PCB's, and other hazardous materials, or disposal 
    actions mandated by Congress. In addition, if the building or structure 
    is listed, or eligible for listing, in the National Register of 
    Historic Places, then compliance with section 106 of the National 
    Historic Preservation Act is required. (Checklist required).
        (14) Outleasing of historic lighthouse properties as outlined in 
    the Programmatic Memorandum of Agreement between the Coast Guard, 
    Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, and the National Conference 
    of State Historic Preservation Officers. (Checklist required).
        (15) Transfer of real property from the Coast Guard to the General 
    Services Administration, Department of the Interior, and other Federal 
    departments and agencies, or as mandated by Congress; and the granting 
    of leases, permits, and easements where there is no substantial change 
    in use of the property. (Checklist required).
        (16) Renewals and minor amendments of existing real estate licenses 
    or grants for use of government-owned real property where prior 
    environmental review has determined that no significant environmental 
    effects would occur.
        (17) New grants or renewal of existing grants of license, easement, 
    or similar arrangements for the use of existing rights-of-way or 
    incidental easements complementing the use of existing rights-of-way 
    for use by vehicles; for such existing rights-of-way as electrical, 
    telephone, and other transmission and communication lines; water, 
    wastewater, stormwater, and irrigation pipelines, pumping stations, and 
    facilities; and for similar utility and transportation uses. (Checklist 
    required).
        (18) Defense preparedness training and exercises conducted on other 
    than Coast Guard property, where the lead agency or department is not 
    Coast Guard or DOT and the lead agency or department has completed its 
    NEPA analysis and documentation requirements.
        (19) Defense preparedness training and exercises conducted on Coast 
    Guard property that do not involve undeveloped property or increased 
    noise levels over adjacent property and that involve a limited number 
    of personnel, such as exercises involving primarily electronic 
    simulation or command post personnel.
        (20) Simulated exercises, including tactical and logistical 
    exercises that involve small numbers of personnel.
        (21) Training of an administrative or classroom nature.
        (22) Operations to carry out maritime safety, maritime law 
    enforcement, search and rescue, domestic ice breaking, and oil or 
    hazardous substance removal programs that have been the subject of a 
    programmatic NEPA analysis and documentation.
        (23) Actions performed as a part of Coast Guard operations and the 
    Aids to Navigation Program to carry out statutory authority in the area 
    of establishment of floating and minor fixed aids to navigation, except 
    electronic sound signals.
        (24) Routine movement of personnel and equipment, and the routine 
    movement, handling, and distribution of nonhazardous and hazardous 
    materials and wastes in accordance with applicable regulations.
        (25) Coast Guard participation in disaster relief efforts under the 
    guidance or leadership of another Federal agency that has taken 
    responsibility for NEPA compliance.
        (26) Data gathering, information gathering, and studies that 
    involve no physical change to the environment. Examples include 
    topographic surveys, bird counts, wetland mapping, and other 
    inventories.
        (27) Natural and cultural resource management and research 
    activities that are in accordance with interagency agreements and which 
    are designed to improve or upgrade the Coast Guard's ability to manage 
    those resources.
        (28) Contracts for activities conducted at established laboratories 
    and facilities, to include contractor-operated laboratories and 
    facilities, on Coast Guard-owned property where all airborne emissions, 
    waterborne effluents, external radiation levels, outdoor noise, and 
    solid and bulk waste disposal practices are in compliance with existing 
    applicable Federal, State, and local laws and regulations. (Checklist 
    required).
        (29) Approval of recreational activities (such as a Coast Guard 
    unit picnic) which do not involve significant physical alteration of 
    the environment, increase disturbance by humans of sensitive natural 
    habitats, or disturbance of historic properties, and which do not occur 
    in, or adjacent to, areas inhabited by threatened or endangered 
    species. (Checklist required unless the activity will take place at a 
    location developed or created for that type of activity).
        (30) Review of documents, such as studies, reports, and analyses, 
    prepared for legislative proposals that did not originate in DOT and 
    that relate to matters that are not the primary responsibility of the 
    Coast Guard.
        (31) Planning and technical studies which do not contain 
    recommendations for authorization or funding for future construction, 
    but may recommend further study. This includes engineering efforts or 
    environmental studies undertaken to define the elements of a proposal 
    or alternatives sufficiently so that the environmental effects may be 
    assessed and does not exclude consideration of environmental matters in 
    the studies.
        (32) Bridge Administration Program actions which can be described 
    as one of the following:
        (a) Modification or replacement of an existing bridge on 
    essentially the same alignment or location. Excluded are bridges with 
    historic significance or bridges providing access to undeveloped 
    barrier islands and beaches.
        (b) Construction of pipeline bridges for transporting potable 
    water.
        (c) Construction of pedestrian, bicycle, or equestrian bridges and 
    stream gauging cableways used to transport people.
        (d) Temporary replacement of a bridge immediately after a natural 
    disaster or a catastrophic failure for reasons of public safety, 
    health, or welfare.
        (e) Promulgation of operating regulations or procedures for 
    drawbridges. (Checklist required).
        (f) Identification of advance approval waterways under 33 CFR 
    115.70.
        (g) Any Bridge Program action which is classified as a CE by 
    another Department of Transportation agency acting as lead agency for 
    such an action.
        (33) Preparation of guidance documents that implement, without 
    substantive change, the applicable Commandant Instruction or other 
    Federal agency regulations, procedures, manuals, and other guidance 
    documents.
        (34) Promulgation of the following regulations: (Note: When relying 
    upon a CE in promulgating regulations, an environmental analysis 
    checklist and an attached CED (Enclosure 6) must be filed in the 
    rulemaking docket before publication of a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking 
    (NPRM), or an Interim or Final Rule not preceded by an NPRM, unless 
    specifically indicated below.)
        (a) Regulations which are editorial or procedural, such as those 
    updating addresses or establishing application procedures.
        (b) Regulations concerning internal agency functions or 
    organization or personnel administration, such as funding, establishing 
    Captain of the Port boundaries, or delegating authority.
        (c) Regulations concerning the training, qualifying, licensing, and 
    disciplining of maritime personnel.
        (d) Regulations concerning manning, documentation, admeasurement, 
    inspection, and equipping of vessels.
        (e) Regulations concerning equipment approval and carriage 
    requirements.
        (f) Regulations establishing, disestablishing, or changing the size 
    of Special Anchorage Areas or anchorage grounds. (Checklist and CED not 
    required for actions that disestablish or reduce the size of the Area 
    or grounds).
        (g) Regulations establishing, disestablishing, or changing 
    Regulated Navigation Areas and security or safety zones. (Checklist and 
    CED not required for actions that disestablish or reduce the size of 
    the area or zone. For temporary areas and zones that are established to 
    deal with emergency situations and that are less than one week in 
    duration, the checklist and CED are not required. For temporary areas 
    and zones that are established to deal with emergency situations and 
    that are one week or longer in duration, the checklist and CED will be 
    prepared and submitted after issuance or publication.)
        (h) Special local regulations issued as a condition of a granted 
    regatta or marine parade permit that was issued after appropriate 
    environmental analysis (Checklist and CED not required.)
        (i) Regulations in aid of navigation, such as those concerning 
    rules of the road, International Regulations for the Prevention of 
    Collisions at Sea (COLREGS), bridge-to-bridge communications, vessel 
    traffic services, and marking of navigation systems.
        (35) Routine approvals of regatta and marine parade permits for 
    marine events which are described as follows:
        (a) Fishing tournaments involving approximately 50 powerboats (up 
    to approximately 26 feet in length with engines of approximately 50 HP) 
    and not more than approximately 200 spectator craft.
        (b) Sailing competitions or demonstrations involving approximately 
    50 sailboats (up to approximately 26 to 50 feet in length which may 
    have auxiliary propulsion of approximately 50 HP) and not more than 
    approximately 200 spectator craft.
        (c) Sailing competitions or demonstrations involving approximately 
    100 sailboats (up to approximately 26 feet in length) or sailboats and 
    not more than approximately 200 spectator craft.
        (d) Paddling, rowing, or floating competitions or demonstrations 
    involving approximately 200 canoes, kayaks, rowboats, rowing sculls, or 
    rafts (up to approximately 26 feet in length) and not more than 
    approximately 200 spectator craft.
        (e) Rowing competitions or demonstrations involving approximately 
    200 racing shells (up to approximately 60 feet in length) and not more 
    than approximately 200 spectator craft.
        (f) Parades involving approximately 100 sailboats, powerboats, 
    unpowered watercraft, or a combination thereof (up to approximately 50 
    feet in length with approximately 50 HP primary or auxiliary 
    propulsion), operating at no or low wake speed and not more than 
    approximately 200 spectator craft.
        (g) Swimming competitions involving approximately 800 swimmers and 
    not more than approximately 200 spectator craft.
        (h) Fireworks displays over water not lasting over approximately 30 
    minutes and involving not more than approximately 200 spectator craft.
    
        Dated: July 18, 1994.
    J.F. Milbrand,
    Acting Chief, Office of Engineering, Logistics and Development.
    [FR Doc. 94-18553 Filed 7-28-94; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-14-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
07/29/1994
Department:
Coast Guard
Entry Type:
Uncategorized Document
Action:
Notice of final agency procedures and policy for categorical exclusions.
Document Number:
94-18553
Pages:
0-0 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Federal Register: July 29, 1994, CGD 93-090