97-19867. Maritimes & Northeast Pipeline, L.L.C.; Notice of Amendment to Application  

  • [Federal Register Volume 62, Number 145 (Tuesday, July 29, 1997)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 40516-40517]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 97-19867]
    
    
    
    [[Page 40516]]
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
    
    Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
    [Docket No. CP96-809-003]
    
    
    Maritimes & Northeast Pipeline, L.L.C.; Notice of Amendment to 
    Application
    
    July 23, 1997.
        Take notice that on July 11, 1997, Maritimes & Northeast Pipeline, 
    L.L.C. (Maritimes), a Delaware limited liability company, filed an 
    amendment to its September 23, 1996, application for a certificate of 
    public convenience and necessity, under to Section 7(c) of the Natural 
    Gas Act, and Part 157 of the Commission's regulations. Maritimes's 
    September 23rd application seeks authority to construct, own, operate 
    and maintain a natural gas pipeline from Wells, Maine to the U.S.-
    Canadian border near Woodland, Maine and related pipeline laterals and 
    compressor stations. The July 11th amendment changes certain parts of 
    the route of Maritimes's proposed pipeline, changes certain parts of 
    the lateral routes, and relocates the proposed Richmond Compressor 
    Station. The details of the route changes are more fully set forth in 
    the amendment which is on file and available to the public for 
    inspection.
        Maritimes's September 23 Application is for Phase II of its 
    Project, as previously revised by its amendment filed on February 24, 
    1997 in Docket No. CP96-809-002. Maritimes's Phase II Project involves 
    the construction of natural gas pipeline facilities from Wells to 
    Woodland, as well as the provision of natural gas transportation 
    service through those facilities. The overall Maritimes Project is part 
    of a natural gas transportation facility for the Sable Offshore Energy 
    Project (SOEP), which is being developed by a consortium of United 
    States and Canadian energy companies. The SOEP is scheduled to bring 
    offshore natural gas to the Maritimes Provinces in Canada and the 
    northeastern United States in 1999. The joint construction, ownership 
    and operation of a part of the Phase II facilities, from Wells to 
    Westbrook, Maine is pending in Docket No. CP97-238-000; Portland 
    Natural Gas Transmission System (PNGTS) is the joint applicant, along 
    with Maritimes. The February 24th amendment reflects changes in Phase 
    II of Maritimes's project related to the joint facilities.
        The July 11th Amendment reflects the reroutes of the proposed 
    mainline and lateral facilities and the relocation of a compressor 
    station that have been adopted by Maritimes since its filing of the 
    original pipeline rout in the September 23rd Application. Maritimes 
    states that the reroutes and compressor station location reflected in 
    the Amendment will result in:
        (i) a reduction in the number of major water body crossings;
        (ii) a reduction in the number of miles of wetlands crossed;
        (iii) a reduction in impacts to residences; and,
        (iv) an increase in the number of miles of proposed pipeline that 
    are located adjacent to or within existing rights-of-way.
        Maritimes provided the following summary description of the three 
    largest mainline reroutes that it has adopted as part of its Phase II 
    primary route, as well as a description of the new compressor station 
    location and the Northern Alternative in the Richmond and Kennebec 
    River area. Smaller route modifications are described in the exhibits 
    and resource reports which accompanied the amendment.
        The Bangor Hydro reroute, located in Washington and Hancock 
    Counties, Maine, comprises about 46 miles of the reroutes proposed in 
    the July 11th Amendment. Maritimes incorporated this reroute into its 
    primary route to follow the existing Stud Mill Road corridor, the 
    proposed Bangor Hydro corridor, and existing landowner-owned roads. 
    Maritimes says that these landowner-owned roads provide both an 
    existing corridor for the pipeline and potential overlap for work space 
    where none originally existed. Maritimes says that although the Bangor 
    Hydro reroute results in an increase of over three miles to the length 
    of the original route, it determined that the environmental benefits of 
    this reroute (mitigating the impact to existing forested lands and 
    existing salmon habitat and deer yards in the Machias and Narraquagus 
    River watersheds) warranted incorporated this reroute into its primary 
    route.
        Maritimes has incorporated another reroute in the Bangor-Brewer 
    area, known as the Bangor Water District (BWD) Reroute. This reroute 
    comprises about 20 miles long. Maritimes proposes to reroute the 
    pipeline in this area since its original route traversed portions of a 
    BWD watershed that comprises one of the sources of potable water for 
    the Bangor-Brewer area, and to avoid Camp Roosevelt, a property owned 
    by the Katahdin Council (Boy Scouts of America).
        Maritimes has also proposed 12 miles of reroute in the Richmond, 
    Maine area. Maritimes says that the Richmond Reroute is the result of 
    its effort to improve its original route by avoiding residential and 
    wetlands areas and by mitigating the environmental impacts and 
    engineering constraints related to crossing existing roadways and the 
    Kennebec Rivers. As a result of this reroute, Maritimes proposes to 
    relocate its proposed compressor station in the Richmond area, which 
    was originally proposed to be located near Milepost 145, to a location 
    near revised Milepost 143. The environmental report provided by 
    Maritimes as part of the July 11th amendment discusses a ``Northern 
    Alternative Route'' which Maritimes says would make greater use of 
    existing rights-of-way in the Richmond area.
        Maritimes does not expect the reroutes and the change in compressor 
    station location applied for in the Amendment to materially affect the 
    cost of the Phase II Project, although the revised Exhibit G shows a 
    4.2-mile net increase in the length of the proposed mainline. The July 
    11th Amendment does not reflect any changes in Maritimes's proposed 
    Phase II cost estimate, rates or tariff or related exhibits.
        Maritimes requests a preliminary determination on non-environmental 
    issues in this proceeding by September 1997. With respect to a final 
    certificate addressing environmental issues, Maritimes requests that 
    the Commission act upon its amended application as soon as reasonably 
    possible.
        Any person desiring to be heard or to make any protest with 
    reference to said Amendment should on or before August 13, 1997, file 
    with the Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, a 
    motion to intervene or protest in accordance with the requirements of 
    the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 or 
    385.214) and the regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.10). 
    All protests filed with the Commission will be considered by it in 
    determining the appropriate action to be taken but will not serve to 
    make the protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to 
    become a party to a proceeding or to participate as a party in any 
    hearing therein must file a motion to intervene in accordance with the 
    Commission's rules. Any person who has already filed a motion to 
    intervene in Docket Nos. CP96-809-000 or CP96-809-002 need not file 
    again to obtain intervenor status.
        Take further notice that pursuant to the authority contained in and 
    subject to the jurisdiction conferred upon the Commission by Sections 7 
    and 15 of the Natural Gas Act and the Commission's Rules of Practice 
    and Procedure, a hearing will be held without further notice before the 
    Commission or its designee on this Amendment if no petition to 
    intervene is filed within the time required herein or if the
    
    [[Page 40517]]
    
    Commission on its own review of the matter finds that a grant of the 
    certificate is required by the public convenience and necessity. If a 
    petition for leave to intervene is filed or if the Commission, on its 
    own motion, believes that a formal hearing is required, further notice 
    of such hearing will be duly given.
        Under the procedure herein provided for, unless otherwise advised, 
    it will be unnecessary for Maritimes & Northeast to appear or be 
    represented at the hearing.
    Lois D. Cashell,
    Secretary.
    [FR Doc. 97-19867 Filed 7-28-97; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
07/29/1997
Department:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
97-19867
Pages:
40516-40517 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. CP96-809-003
PDF File:
97-19867.pdf