[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 145 (Wednesday, July 29, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 40518-40519]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-20207]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket Nos. SA98-96-000, SA98-97-000, SA98-98-000, SA98-99-000, SA98-
100-000 (Not Consolidated)]
IMC Global, Inc.; Notice of Petitions for Dispute Resolution and
Adjustment
July 23, 1998.
Take notice that on July 15, 1998, IMC Global, Inc. (IMC) filed the
above-referenced petitions, pursuant to section 502(c) of the Natural
Gas Policy Act of 1978. IMC's petitions, for various reasons, reject
(in whole or in part) the Kansas ad valorem tax refund claims made by
the pipelines listed below.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pipeline Docket No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Colorado Interstate Gas Company......... SA98-96-000
Northern Natural Gas Company............ SA98-97-000
Williams Gas Pipelines Central, Inc..... SA98-98-000
[[Page 40519]]
K N Interstate Gas Transmission Company. SA98-99-000
Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company..... SA98-100-000
------------------------------------------------------------------------
If adjustment relief becomes necessary (i.e., if the Commission
determines that IMC owes Kansas ad valorem tax refunds to one or more
of the subject pipelines), IMC requests to be relieved from making the
refunds attributable to royalties, on the ground that such refunds are
now uncollectible, owing to the enactment of section 7 of House Bill
No. 2419, by the State of Kansas. IMC's petitions are on file with the
Commission and they are open to public inspection.
The Commission, by order issued September 10, 1997, in Docket No.
RP97-369-000 et al.,\1\ on remand from the D.C. Circuit Court of
Appeals,\2\ directed First Sellers to make Kansas ad valorem tax
refunds, with interest, to the appropriate pipelines, for the period
from 1983 to 1988. In its January 28, 1998 Order Clarifying Procedures
[82 FERC para. 61,059 (1998)], the Commission stated that producers
(i.e., First Sellers) could file dispute resolution requests with the
Commission, asking the Commission to resolve the dispute with the
pipeline over the amount of Kansas ad valorem tax refunds owed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See: 80 FERC para. 61,264 (1997); rehearing denied January
28, 1998, 82 FERC para. 61,058 (1998).
\2\ Public Service Company of Colorado v. FERC, 91 F.3d 1478
(D.C. 1996), cert. denied, Nos. 96-954 and 96-1230 (65 U.S.L.W. 3751
and 3754, May 12, 1997).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Any person desiring to be heard or to make any protest with
reference to any of these petitions should on or before 15 days after
the date of publication in the Federal Register of this notice, file
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E.,
Washington, D.C. 20426, a motion to intervene or a protest in
accordance with the requirements of the Commission's Rules of Practice
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.214, 385.211, 385.1105, and 385.1106). All
protests filed with the Commission will be considered by it in
determining the appropriate action to be taken but will not serve to
make the protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to
become a party to a proceeding or to participate as a party in any
hearing therein must file a motion to intervene in accordance with the
Commission's Rules.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-20207 Filed 7-28-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
