96-19296. Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change and Amendment Nos. 1 and 2 Thereto by the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. (``NASD'' or ``Association'') Relating to Telemarketing Rules  

  • [Federal Register Volume 61, Number 147 (Tuesday, July 30, 1996)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 39686-39688]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 96-19296]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
    [Release No. 34-37475;File No. SR-NASD-96-28]
    
    
    Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule 
    Change and Amendment Nos. 1 and 2 Thereto by the National Association 
    of Securities Dealers, Inc. (``NASD'' or ``Association'') Relating to 
    Telemarketing Rules
    
    July 24, 1996.
        Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
    (``Act''),\1\ notice is hereby given that on June 28, 1996, the 
    National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. (``NASD'' or 
    ``Association'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission 
    (``SEC'' or ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in 
    Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by the self-
    regulatory organization. On July 18, 1996, the NASD filed Amendment No. 
    1 to its proposal.\2\ On July 24, 1996, the NASD filed Amendment No. 2 
    to its proposal.\3\ The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit 
    comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
        \2\ In Amendment No. 1, the NASD withdrew its request for 
    approving the proposed rule change prior to the 30th day after 
    publication in the Federal Register; added the word ``do'' after the 
    word ``who'' in subparagraph (g)(1) to Rule 3110; and added the 
    phrase ``or person associated with a member'' after the word 
    ``member'' in subparagraph (g)(2) to Rule 3110. See Letter from John 
    Ramsay, Deputy General Counsel, NASD Regulation, Inc. (``NASDR''), 
    to Katherine A. England, Assistant Director, Division of Market 
    Regulation, SEC, dated July 18, 1996
        \3\ In Amendment No. 2, the NASD replaced the phrase ``or a 
    person acting at the direction of a person associated with a 
    member,'' with ``or another associated person acting at the 
    direction of such person'' in subparagraph (c) to Rule 2211 to 
    clarify that the exceptions to the requirements of paragraphs (a) 
    and (b) of Rule 2211, as proposed, apply only to a person associated 
    with a member or another associated person acting at the direction 
    of such associated person. See Letter from John Ramsay, Deputy 
    General Council, NASDR, to Katherine A. England, Assistant Director, 
    Division of Market Regulation, SEC, dated July 24, 1996.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance 
    of the Proposed Rule Change
    
        Below is the text of the proposed rule change. Proposed new 
    language is italicized; proposed deletions are in brackets.
    
    Conduct Rules
    
    2000. Business Conduct
    * * * * *
    2200. Communications With Customers and the public
    
    2211. Telemarketing
    
        No member or person associated with a member shall:
        (a) Make outbound telephone calls to the residence of any person 
    for the purpose of soliciting the purchase of securities or related 
    services at any time other than between 8 a.m. and 9 p.m. local time at 
    the called person's location, without the prior consent of the person; 
    or
        (b) Make an outbound telephone call to any person for the purpose 
    of soliciting the purchase of securities or related services without 
    disclosing promptly and in a clear and conspicuous manner to the called 
    person the following information:
        (1) The identity of the caller and the member firm;
        (2) The telephone number or address at which the caller may be 
    contacted; and
        (3) That the purpose of the call is to solicit the purchase of 
    securities or related services.
        (c) The prohibitions of paragraphs (a) and (b) shall not apply to 
    telephone calls by any person associated with a member, or another 
    associated person acting at the direction of such person for the 
    purpose of maintaining and servicing the accounts of existing customers 
    of the member under the control of or assigned to such associated 
    person:
        (1) To an existing customer who, within the preceding twelve 
    months, has effected a securities transaction in, or made a deposit of 
    funds or securities into, an account that, at the time of the 
    transaction or the deposit, was under the control of or assigned to, 
    such associated person;
        (2) To an existing customer who previously has effected a 
    securities transaction in, or made a deposit of funds or securities 
    into, an account that, at the time of the transaction or deposit, was 
    under the control of or assigned to, such associated person, provided 
    that such customer's account has earned interest or divided income 
    during the preceding twelve months; or
        (3) To a broker or dealer. For the purposes of paragraph (c), the 
    term ``existing customer'' means a customer for whom the broker or 
    dealer, or a clearing broker or dealer on behalf of such broker or 
    dealer, carries an account.
    * * * * *
    3000. Responsibilities Relating to Associated Persons, Employees, and 
    Others' Employees
    * * * * *
    3100. Book and Records, and Financial Condition
    3110. Books and Records
    * * * * *
    (g) [Cold Call] Telemarketing Requirements
    
        (1) Each member shall make and maintain a centralized do-not-call 
    list of persons who do not wish to receive telephone solicitations from 
    such member or its associated person.
        (2) No member or person associated with a member shall obtain from 
    a customer or submit for payment a check, draft, or other form of 
    negotiable paper drawn on a customer's checking, savings, share, or 
    similar account, without that person's express written authorization, 
    which may include the customer's signature on the negotiable 
    instrument.
        (3) Each member shall maintain the authorization required by 
    subparagraph (2) for a period of three years.
    
    II. Self-Regulatory Organizations Statement of the Purpose of, and 
    Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
    
        In its filing with the Commission, the NASD included statements 
    concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and 
    discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The 
    text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in 
    Item IV below. The NASD has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections 
    A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.
    
    A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
    Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
    
    1. Purpose
        Introduction and Background. Pursuant to the Telephone Consumer 
    Protection Act (``TCPA''),\4\ the NASD adopted in June 1995, a ``cold 
    call'' rule to implement certain rules of the Federal Communications 
    Commission (``FCC Rule'') \5\ that require persons who
    
    [[Page 39687]]
    
    engage in telephone solicitations to sell products and services 
    (``telemarketers'') to establish and maintain a list of persons who 
    have requested that they not be contacted by the called (a ``do not-
    call'' list).\6\ Under the Telemarketing and Consumer Fraud and Abuse 
    Prevention Act (``Telemarketing Act''), which became law in August 
    1994,\7\ the Federal Trade Commission adopted detailed regulations 
    (``FTC Rules'') to prohibit deceptive and abusive telemarketing acts 
    and practices that became effective on December 31, 1995.\8\ The FTC 
    Rules, among other things, (i) require the maintenance of ``do-not-
    call'' lists and procedures, (ii) prohibit abusive, annoying, or 
    harassing telemarketing calls, (iii) prohibit telemarketing call before 
    8 a.m. or after 9 p.m., (iv) require a telemarketer to identify 
    himself, the company he works for, and the purpose of the call, and (v) 
    require express written authorization or other verifiable authorization 
    from the customer before use of negotiable instruments called ``demand 
    drafts.'' \9\ While the FCC and FTC Rules are applicable to members 
    that engage in telephone solicitation to market their products and 
    services, those regulations cannot be enforced by either the Securities 
    and Exchange Commission (``SEC'') or the securities self-regulatory 
    organizations (``SROs''). Under the Telemarketing Act, the SEC is 
    required either to promulgate or to require the SROs to promulgate 
    rules substantially similar to the FTC rules, unless the SEC determines 
    either that the rules are not necessary or appropriate for the 
    protection of investors or the maintenance of orderly markets, or that 
    existing federal securities laws or SEC rules already provide for such 
    protection.\10\ The staff of the SEC has advised that it believes that 
    additional rulemaking is necessary to satisfy the requirements of the 
    Telemarketing Act. The NASD believes that, because the SROs will be the 
    primary enforcers of these rules, it may be more appropriate to require 
    the SROs individually to adopt separate rules than for the SEC to adopt 
    the rules for the entire industry. In addition, these rules relate to 
    the regulation of sales practices which the NASD believes it should 
    take the lead in promulgating and enforcing. The NASD intends to 
    implement requirement (ii) by issuing an interpretation that such 
    conduct is violative of existing rules and implement requirements 
    (iii)--(v) by amending their rules.\11\ In order to approve the 
    proposed rule change in accordance with the Telemarketing Act, the SEC 
    must determine that the rule, together with existing federal securities 
    laws and regulations, provide protection substantially similar to the 
    FTC Rules.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \4\ 47 U.S.C. Sec. 227.
        \5\ Pursuant to the TCPA, the FCC adopted rules in December 1992 
    that, among other things, (1) prohibit cold-calls to residential 
    telephone customers before 8 a.m. or after 9 p.m. (location time at 
    the called party's location) and (2) require persons or entities 
    engaging in cold-calling to institute procedures for maintaining a 
    ``do-not-call'' list that includes, at a minimum, (a) a written 
    policy for maintaining the do-not-call list, (b) training personnel 
    in the existence and use thereof, (c) recording a consumer's name 
    and telephone number on the do-not-call list at the time the request 
    not to receive calls is made, and retaining such information on the 
    do-not-call list for a period of at least ten years, and (d) 
    requiring telephone solicitors to provide the called party with the 
    name of the individual caller, the name of the person or entity on 
    whose behalf the call is being made and a telephone number or 
    address at which such person or entity may be contacted. 57 FR 48333 
    (codified at 47 C.F.R. Sec. 64.1200). With certain limited 
    exceptions, the FCC Rules apply to all residential telephone 
    solicitations, including those relating to securities transactions. 
    Id. The term ``telephone solicitation'' refers to the initiation of 
    a telephone call or message for the purpose of encouraging the 
    purchase or rental of, or investment in, property, goods, or 
    services, which is transmitted to any person, other than with the 
    called person's express invitation or permission, or to a person 
    with whom the caller has an established business relationship, or by 
    tax-exempt non-profit organization. Id.
        \6\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 35831 Jun. 9, 1995, 60 
    FR 31527 (Jun. 15, 1995) (order approving File No. SR-NASD-95-13).
        \7\ 15 U.S.C. Secs. 6101-08
        \8\ Secs. 310.3-4 of FTC Rules.
        \9\ Id.
        \10\ Specifically, Section 3(d)(1)(B) of the Telemarketing Act 
    provides that the Commission is not required to promulgate a rule 
    under Section 3(d)(1)(A) if it determines that (i) federal 
    securities laws or rules adopted by the Commission thereunder 
    provide protection from deceptive and other abusive telemarketing by 
    persons described in Section 3(d)(2) substantially similar to that 
    provided by rules promulgated by the Federal Trade Commission under 
    Section 3(a) or (ii) a rule promulgated by the Commission is not 
    necessary or appropriate in the public interest, or for the 
    protection of investors, or would be inconsistent with the 
    maintenance of fair and orderly markets. 15 U.S.C. 
    Sec. 6102(d)(1)(B).
        \11\ The SEC staff requested that the SROs implement the 
    requirement in (ii) referenced above by issuing an interpretation 
    that abusive telemarketing calls are inconsistent with just and 
    equitable principles of trade. At its May 1996 meeting, the NASDR 
    Board authorized a Notice to Members (``NTM'') that sets forth the 
    interpretation that abusive communications from members or 
    associated persons of members to customers is a violation of Rule 
    2110 of the NASD's Conduct Rules. The NASDR published this NTM in 
    July 1996. NTM 96-44 (July 1996).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        Description of Proposed Amendments. Time Limitations and 
    Disclosure. The proposed rule change adds new Rule 2211 to Rule 2200 of 
    the NASD's Conduct Rules to prohibit, under proposed paragraph (a) to 
    Rule 2211, a member or person associated with a member from making 
    outbound telephone calls to a member of the public's residence for the 
    purpose of soliciting the purchase of securities or related services at 
    any time other than between 8 a.m. and 9 p.m. local time at the called 
    person's location and to require, under proposed paragraph (b) to Rule 
    2211, such member or associated person to promptly disclose to the 
    called person in a clear and conspicuous manner the caller's identityy 
    and firm, the telephone number or address at which the caller may be 
    contacted, and that the purpose of the call to solicit the purchase of 
    securities or related services.
        Proposed paragraph (c) to Rule 2211 creates exemptions from the 
    time-of-day and disclosure requirements of paragraphs (a) and (b) for 
    telephone calls by associated persons, or other associated persons 
    acting at the direction of such persons for purposes of maintaining and 
    servicing existing customers assigned to or under the control of the 
    associated persons, to certain categories of ``existing customers.'' 
    Paragraph (c) defines ``existing customer'' as a customer for whom the 
    broker or dealer, or a clearing broker or dealer on behalf of the 
    broker or dealer, carries an account. Proposed subparagraph (c)(1) 
    exempts such calls to an existing customer who, within the preceding 
    twelve months, has effected a securities transaction in, or made a 
    deposit of funds or securities into, an account under the control of or 
    assigned to such associated person at the time of the transaction or 
    deposit. Proposed subparagraph (c)(2) exempts such calls to an existing 
    customer who, at any time, has effected a securities transaction in, or 
    made a deposit of funds or securities into an account under the control 
    of or assigned to the associated person at the time of the transaction 
    or deposit, as long as the customer's account has earned interest or 
    dividend income during the preceding twelve months. Proposed paragraph 
    (c)(3) exempts telephone calls to a broker or dealer.
        Subparagraphs (c) (1) and (2) together exclude only some calls to 
    existing customers from the time-of-day and disclosure requirements of 
    the proposed rule. An associated person, or a person acting at the 
    direction of such associated person, may contact a customer without 
    complying with the requirements of the rule if the customer has 
    effected a transaction or made a deposit during the past year into an 
    account controlled by such associated person, or if the customer has 
    effected a transaction or made a deposit at any time into an account 
    controlled by such associated person and the customer's account has 
    earned interest or divided income during the past year. Thus, calls to 
    certain older or inactive accounts that fall outside these parameters 
    would not be covered by the exemption.
        The Telemarketing Act specifically requires the SEC to establish 
    rules or
    
    [[Page 39688]]
    
    require the self-regulatory organizations to promulgate telemarketing 
    rules consistent with the legislation, unless the SEC determines that 
    the federal securities laws or SEC rules provide protection from 
    abusive telemarketing similar to the rules adopted by the FTC or that a 
    rule by the SEC is not necessary in the public interest.\12\ The NASD 
    believes that it is both appropriate and necessary to create an 
    exemption for calls to a class of customers for whom personal and 
    timely contact with a broker is important, particularly in the emerging 
    environment of 24-hour trading and trading in multiple time zones 
    across the United States where prompt contact with customers to respond 
    to market developments may be necessary. Specifically, the NASD 
    believes that the failure to create such an exemption would be harmful 
    for those securities customers for whom the need exists to be called in 
    a timely manner on certain occasions, and thus inconsistent with the 
    mandate of the Telemarketing Act. The NASD, however, also believes that 
    an exemption for existing customers should not extend to all customers, 
    and should not cover calls to those customers whose accounts do not 
    meet certain minimum levels of activity.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \12\ Telemarketing Act, supra note 10.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        Demand Draft Authorization and Recordkeeping. The proposed rule 
    change amends Rule 3110 of the NASD's Conduct Rules to (i) prohibit a 
    member or person associated with a member from obtaining from a 
    customer or submitting for payment a check, draft, or other form of 
    negotiable paper drawn on a customer's checking, savings, share, or 
    similar account (``demand draft'') without that person's express 
    written authorization, which may include the customer's signature on 
    the instrument, and (ii) to require the retention of such authorization 
    for a period of three years. A ``demand draft'' is a methodology for 
    obtaining funds from a customer's bank account without that person's 
    signature on a negotiable instrument. The customer provide a potential 
    payee with bank account identification information that permits the 
    payee to create a piece of paper that will be processed like a check, 
    including the words ``signature on file'' or ``signature pre-approved'' 
    in the location where the customer's signature normally appears. Most 
    potential payees obtain a written authorization for the use of such a 
    demand draft, but the FTC found that in certain cases only oral 
    authorization was provided by the customer. The new language in 
    subparagraph (g)(2) of Rule 3110 is drawn substantially from the FTC 
    Rule, with the difference that the proposed rule change requires that 
    the customer provide written authorization of a negotiable instrument, 
    in comparison to the FTC Rule which would permit both written and oral 
    authorization subject to certain conditions.\13\ The provision in the 
    proposed rule for demand drafts is only intended to reflect and 
    implement the exact same requirement as set forth in the FTC Rule.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \13\ Sec. 310.3 of FTC Rules.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    2. Statutory Basis
        The NASD believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with 
    the provisions of Section 15A(b) (6) of the Act, \14\ which require 
    that the Association adopt and amend its rules to promote just and 
    equitable principles of trade and generally provide for the protection 
    of customers and the public interest, in that the proposed rule change, 
    by imposing time restriction and disclosure requirements, with certain 
    exceptions, on members' telemarketing calls, and by requiring 
    verifiable authorization from a customer for demand drafts, prevents 
    members from engaging in certain deceptive and abusive telemarketing 
    acts and practices while allowing for legitimate telemarketing 
    practices. The NASD also believes that the proposed rule change 
    fulfills the mandate that SRO rules promulgated under the Telemarketing 
    Act provide protection from deceptive and abusive telemarketing 
    practices and are necessary and appropriate in the public interest and 
    for the protection of investors.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \14\ Sec. 15 U.S.C. 78o-3.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Completion
    
        The Association does not believe that the proposed rule change will 
    impose any inappropriate burden on competition.
    
    C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
    Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
    
        No written comments were either solicited or received.
    
    III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 
    Commission Action
    
        Within 35 days of the publication of this notice in the Federal 
    Register or within such longer period (i) as the Commission may 
    designate up to 90 days of such date if it finds such longer period to 
    be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to 
    which the self-regulatory organizations consents, the Commission will:
        (A) By order approve the proposed rule change, or
        (B) Institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule 
    change should be disapproved.
    
    IV. Solicitation of Comments
    
        Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and 
    arguments concerning the foregoing. Comments particularly are requested 
    as to whether the proposed rule change satisfies the requirements of 
    the Telemarketing Act. Persons making written submissions should file 
    six copies thereof with the Secretary, Securities and Exchange 
    Commission, 450 Fifth Street, NW., Washington, DC 20549. Copies of the 
    submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with 
    respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, 
    and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change 
    between the Commission and by any person, other than those that may be 
    withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 
    552, will be available for inspection and copying at the Commission's 
    Public Reference Room. Copies of such filing will also be available for 
    inspection and copying at the principal office of the NASD. All 
    submissions should refer to File No. SR-NASD-96-28 and should be 
    submitted by August 20, 1996.
    
        For the Commission,by the Division of Market Regulation, 
    pursuant to delegated authority.
    Margaret H. McFarland,
    Deputy Secretary.
    [FR Doc. 96-19296 Filed 7-29-96; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
07/30/1996
Department:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
96-19296
Pages:
39686-39688 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Release No. 34-37475, File No. SR-NASD-96-28
PDF File:
96-19296.pdf