98-20460. Vehicle Monitoring Systems  

  • [Federal Register Volume 63, Number 146 (Thursday, July 30, 1998)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 40659-40664]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 98-20460]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
    
    47 CFR Part 90
    
    [PR Docket No. 93-61; FCC 98-157]
    
    
    Vehicle Monitoring Systems
    
    AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.
    
    ACTION: Final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: In the Second Report and Order, the Commission adopts the 
    general competitive bidding rules and procedures for the auction of 
    multilateration Location and Monitoring
    
    [[Page 40660]]
    
    Service (LMS) licenses, provides small business definitions and adopts 
    bidding credits for eligible small businesses. The effect will be to 
    promote and facilitate the participation of small businesses in the 
    Commission's auctions and in the provision of spectrum-based services. 
    The Second Report and Order also adds rules to allow LMS licensees to 
    partition their geographic licenses and disaggregate portions of their 
    spectrum.
    
    DATES: Effective September 28, 1998, except for Sec. 90.365(d) which 
    will become effective January 19, 1999. Public and agency comments 
    concerning the information collections contained in the Second Report 
    and Order are due September 28, 1998.
    
    ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, 1919 M Street, N.W., Room 
    222, Washington, D.C. 20554. For comments or inquiries regarding 
    information collections, direct all correspondence to Les Smith, 
    Federal Communications Commissions, Room 234, 1919 M St., N.W., 
    Washington, DC 20554 or via the Internet at lessmith@fcc.gov.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ken Burnley or Mark Bollinger, 
    Auctions and Industry Analysis Division, Wireless Telecommunications 
    Bureau, at (202) 418-0660.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Second Report and 
    Order in PR Docket No. 93-61, FCC 98-157, which was adopted on July 9, 
    1998 and released on July 14, 1998. A copy of the complete item is 
    available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in 
    the FCC Reference Center, Room 239, 1919 M Street, N.W., Washington, 
    D.C. 20554. The complete text may be purchased from the Commission's 
    copy contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc., 1231 20th 
    Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036, (202) 857-3800. The complete 
    Second Report and Order is available on the Commission's Internet home 
    page (http://www.fcc.gov).
    
    SUMMARY OF ACTION:
    
    I. Introduction
    
        1. The Federal Communications Commission (Commission) has adopted a 
    Second Report and Order stating rules and procedures governing 
    competitive bidding for multilateration Location and Monitoring Service 
    (LMS) frequencies.
    
    A. Competitive Bidding Design and Procedures
    
        2. In Amendment of Part 90 of the Commission's Rules to Adopt 
    Regulations for Automatic Vehicle Monitoring Systems, Memorandum 
    Opinion and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rule Making, PR Docket 
    No. 93-61, 62 FR 52078, October 6, 1997 (``LMS Further Notice''), the 
    Commission proposed to use the general competitive bidding rules found 
    in subpart Q of part 1 of the Commission's rules as the auction rules 
    for LMS.
        3. The Commission adopts the proposal to follow the competitive 
    bidding procedures contained in Subpart Q of Part 1 of the Commission's 
    Rules, including those adopted in Amendment of Part 1 of the 
    Commission's Rules--Competitive Bidding Procedures, WT Docket No. 97-
    82, Allocation of Spectrum Below 5 GHz Transferred from Federal 
    Government Use, ET Docket No. 94-32, Third Report and Order and Second 
    Further Notice of Proposed Rule Making, 63 FR 2315, January 15, 1998 
    (``Part 1 Third Report and Order''). Consistent with this, matters such 
    as the appropriate competitive bidding design for the auction of LMS 
    licenses, as well as minimum opening bids and reserve prices, will be 
    determined by the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau (``Bureau'') 
    pursuant to its delegated authority.
    
    B. Treatment of Designated Entities
    
        4. In the LMS Further Notice, the Commission acknowledged that it 
    has consistently established ``small business'' definitions on a 
    service-by-service basis, and proposed to establish definitions for the 
    multilateration LMS. For purposes of LMS, the Commission defines a 
    ``small business'' as an entity with average annual gross revenues for 
    the preceding three years not to exceed $15 million, and a ``very small 
    business'' is an entity with average annual gross revenues for the 
    preceding three years not to exceed $3 million. The bidding credits for 
    these small business definitions will be consistent with levels adopted 
    in the Part 1 proceeding. Accordingly, small businesses will receive a 
    25 percent bidding credit, and very small businesses will receive a 35 
    percent bidding credit. Bidding credits for small businesses are not 
    cumulative.
        5. The Commission adopts, with a slight modification, our tentative 
    conclusion to attribute the gross revenues of the applicant, its 
    controlling principals and their affiliates. Specifically, the rule 
    refers to ``controlling interests'' rather than ``controlling 
    principals,'' and provides a definition of ``controlling interest'' to 
    clarify the application of the attribution rule in determining whether 
    an entity qualifies to bid as a small business. In calculating gross 
    revenues for purposes of small business eligibility, applicants will be 
    required to count the gross revenues of the controlling interests of 
    the applicant and their affiliates. A ``controlling interest'' includes 
    individuals or entities with de jure and de facto control of the 
    applicant. De jure control is 50.1% of the voting stock of a 
    corporation or, in the case of a partnership, the general partners. De 
    facto control is determined on a case-by-case basis. The ``controlling 
    interest'' definition also provides specific guidance on calculation of 
    various types of ownership interests.
        6. When an applicant cannot identify controlling interests under 
    the definition, the revenues of all interest holders in the applicant 
    and their affiliates will be counted. For example, if a company is 
    owned by four entities, each of which has twenty-five percent voting 
    equity and no shareholders' agreement or voting trust gives any one of 
    them control of the company, the revenues of all four entities must be 
    counted. This approach is consistent with our treatment of a general 
    partnership--all general partners are considered to have a controlling 
    interest. This rule looks to substance over form in assessing 
    eligibility for small business status and will provide flexibility that 
    will enable legitimate small businesses to attract passive financing in 
    a highly competitive and evolving telecommunications marketplace. The 
    Commission emphasizes that bidders will be subject to the ownership 
    disclosure requirements set forth in 47 CFR 1.2112.
        7. The Commission extends the amount of time for all LMS auction 
    winners to satisfy their construction requirements. Multilateration LMS 
    Economic Area (EA) licensees will be required to construct and place in 
    operation a sufficient number of base stations that utilize 
    multilateration technology to provide multilateration service to one-
    third of the EA's population within five years of initial license 
    grant, and two thirds of the population within ten years. In 
    demonstrating compliance with the construction and coverage 
    requirements, licensees may individually determine an appropriate field 
    strength for reliable service, taking into account the technologies 
    employed in their system design and other relevant technical factors. 
    At the five- and ten-year benchmarks, licensees will be required to 
    file with the Commission a map and other supporting documentation 
    showing compliance with the coverage requirements.
    
    [[Page 40661]]
    
    C. Partitioning and Disaggregation and Unjust Enrichment Provisions
    
        8. The Commission has previously adopted or proposed to adopt 
    partitioning and disaggregation rules for many of the Commercial Mobile 
    Radio Services (CMRS), and now adopts rules to allow multilateration 
    LMS licensees to partition their geographic license areas and 
    disaggregate portions of their spectrum in the same general manner as 
    in other CMRS services. Multilateration LMS licensees may partition or 
    disaggregate to any party eligible to be a multilateration LMS 
    licensee. Further, licensees may partition along any service area 
    defined by the parties. These decisions will permit marketplace forces 
    to determine the most suitable service areas, and will further the goal 
    of regulatory parity among CMRS services. Partitioning and 
    disaggregation will allow auction winners to customize their LMS 
    systems in a manner that will best address their business plans and 
    will help remove entry barriers for small businesses.
        9. To ensure that partitioning and disaggregation do not result in 
    circumvention of our LMS construction requirements, the Commission 
    adopts the dual construction requirements for partitioning and the 
    construction certification procedure for disaggregation used in the 
    broadband Personal Communications Service (PCS). Under the first option 
    for partitioning, the partitionee must certify that it will meet the 
    same coverage requirements as the original licensee for its partitioned 
    market. If the partitionee fails to meet its coverage requirement, the 
    license for the partitioned area will automatically cancel without 
    further Commission action. Under the second option, the original 
    licensee must certify that it has already met or will meet its coverage 
    requirement. Further, parties seeking Commission approval of an LMS 
    disaggregation agreement must include a certification as to which party 
    will be responsible for meeting the construction requirements.
        10. In cases of partitioning, the Commission requires sufficient 
    information to maintain our licensing records. Therefore, consistent 
    with our treatment of the Wireless Communication Service (WCS) and the 
    800 MHz and 900 MHz Specialized Mobile Radio (SMR) services, 
    partitioning applicants will be required to submit, as separate 
    attachments to the partial assignment application, a description of the 
    partitioned service area and a calculation of the population of the 
    partitioned service area and licensed market. The partitioned service 
    area must be defined by coordinate points at every three degrees along 
    the partitioned service area agreed to by both parties, unless county 
    lines are followed. These geographical coordinates must be specified in 
    degrees, minutes and seconds to the nearest second of latitude and 
    longitude, and must be based upon the 1927 North American Datum 
    (NAD27). Applicants also may supply geographical coordinates based on 
    1983 North American Datum (NAD83) in addition to those required based 
    on NAD27. This coordinate data should be supplied as an attachment to 
    the partial assignment application, and maps need not be supplied. In 
    cases where county lines are being utilized, applicants need only list 
    the counties that make up the newly partitioned area.
        11. Consistent with our rules for broadband PCS, WCS and the 800 
    MHz and 900 MHz SMR services, disaggregating parties may negotiate 
    channelization plans among themselves as a part of their disaggregation 
    agreements. In addition, LMS licensees shall be permitted to 
    disaggregate spectrum without limitation on the overall size of the 
    disaggregation as long as such disaggregation is otherwise consistent 
    with our rules.
        12. Also consistent with the rules for broadband PCS, WCS and the 
    800 MHz and 900 MHz SMR services, LMS licensees may use combined 
    partitioning and disaggregation. This will allow LMS licensees the 
    flexibility to design the types of agreements they desire, encourage 
    new market entrants and ensure quality service to the public. In the 
    event that there is a conflict in the application of the partitioning 
    and disaggregation rules, the partitioning rules shall prevail.
        13. The Commission adopts its proposal to prevent possible unjust 
    enrichment through partitioning or disaggregation. Accordingly, the 
    Part 1 unjust enrichment provisions will apply for LMS. These rules are 
    similar to unjust enrichment rules adopted for the 800 MHz SMR auction 
    for determining the actual proportion of bidding credit to be refunded 
    and reduce the amount of unjust enrichment payments due on transfer 
    based upon the amount of time the initial license has been held. In 
    addition, when a combination of partitioning and disaggregation is 
    proposed, these pro rata calculations will be based on both the 
    population of the partitioned area and the amount of spectrum 
    disaggregated.
    
    II. Regulatory Flexibility Act
    
        14. As required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 
    603, an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) was incorporated 
    in the Memorandum Opinion and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rule 
    Making. See Amendment of Part 90 of the Commission's Rules to Adopt 
    Regulations for Automatic Vehicle Monitoring Systems, PR Docket No. 93-
    61, Memorandum Opinion and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rule 
    Making, 62 FR 52078, October 6 , 1997 (``Further Notice''). The 
    Commission sought written public comment on the proposals in the 
    Further Notice, including comment on the IRFA. The present Final 
    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (FRFA) conforms to the RFA. See 5 
    U.S.C. 604.
    
    A. Need for, and Objectives of, the Second Report and Order in PR 
    Docket 93-61
    
        15. The adopted provisions are based on the competitive bidding 
    authority of Section 309(j) of the Communications Act of 1934, as 
    amended, 47 U.S.C. 309(j), which authorized the Commission to use 
    auctions to select from among mutually exclusive initial applications 
    in certain services, including multilateration LMS.
    
    B. Summary of Significant Issues Raised by Public Comments in Response 
    to the IRFA
    
        16. There were no comments filed directly in response to the IRFA; 
    however, the Commission received 2 comments in response to the Further 
    Notice.
    
    C. Description and Estimate of the Number of Small Entities to Which 
    Rules Will Apply
    
        17. The applicable definition under SBA rules of a small entity is 
    the definition under the rules applicable to radiotelephone (wireless) 
    companies. This provides that a small entity is a radiotelephone 
    company employing no more than 1,500 persons. According to the Bureau 
    of the Census, only twelve radiotelephone firms out of a total of 1,178 
    such firms which operated during 1992 had 1,000 or more employees. 1992 
    Census, Series UC92-S-1, at Table 5, SIC code 4812. Therefore, using 
    such data, even if all twelve of these firms were LMS companies, nearly 
    all such carriers were small businesses under the SBA's definition.
        18. In the Second Report and Order, the Commission has adopted more 
    refined definitions for small business categories. The definition of a 
    ``small business'' is an entity with average annual gross revenues for 
    the preceding three years not to exceed $15 million. The definition of 
    a ``very small
    
    [[Page 40662]]
    
    business'' is an entity with average annual gross revenues for the 
    preceding three years not to exceed $3 million. The Commission is 
    seeking SBA approval for these new LMS size standards. See also Second 
    Report and Order, n. 47.
        19. As noted in the Second Report and Order, there are 528 licenses 
    to be awarded in the upcoming auction. New entrants could obtain 
    multilateration LMS licenses through the competitive bidding procedure, 
    and take the opportunity to partition and/or disaggregate a license or 
    obtain an additional license through partitioning or disaggregation. 
    Additionally, entities that are neither incumbent licensees nor 
    geographic area licensees could enter the market by obtaining a 
    multilateration LMS license through partitioning or disaggregation.
        20. The Commission cannot estimate how many licensees or potential 
    licensees could take the opportunity to partition and/or disaggregate a 
    license or obtain a license through partitioning and/or disaggregation, 
    because it has not yet determined the size or number of multilateration 
    LMS licenses that will be granted in the future. Therefore, the number 
    of small entities that will be affected is unknown. Given the fact that 
    no reliable estimate of the total number of future multilateration LMS 
    licensees can be made, the Commission assumes for purposes of this FRFA 
    that all of the licenses will be awarded to small businesses.
    
    D. Summary of the Projected Reporting, Recordkeeping, and Other 
    Compliance Requirements.
    
        21. The rules and provisions adopted in the Second Report and Order 
    include the possibility of new reporting and recordkeeping requirements 
    for a number of small business entities:
        22. Competitive Bidding Applications. LMS license applicants will 
    be subject to reporting and recordkeeping requirements to comply with 
    the competitive bidding rules. Specifically, applicants will apply for 
    LMS licenses by filing a short-form application (FCC Form 175), and 
    will file a long-form application (FCC Form 601) at the conclusion of 
    the auction. Additionally, entities seeking treatment as small 
    businesses will need to submit information pertaining to the gross 
    revenues of the small business applicant and its affiliates and certain 
    investors in the applicant.
        23. Construction Requirements. The proposals in the Second Report 
    and Order include reporting and recordkeeping requirements for new LMS 
    licensees to establish compliance with the coverage requirements. See 
    Second Report and Order, para. 30.
        24. Geographic Partitioning and Spectrum Disaggregation. The 
    proposals in the Second Report and Order include reporting and 
    recordkeeping requirements for small businesses seeking licenses 
    through the proposed partitioning and disaggregation rules. The 
    information requirements would be used to determine whether the 
    licensee is a qualifying entity to obtain partitioned or disaggregated 
    spectrum. This information will be a one-time filing by any applicant 
    requesting such a license.
    
    E. Steps Taken To Minimize Significant Economic Impact on Small 
    Entities, and Significant Alternatives Considered
    
        25. The Second Report and Order adopts certain provisions for 
    smaller entities designed to ensure that such entities have the 
    opportunity to participate in the competitive bidding process and in 
    the provision of multilateration LMS services. The Commission 
    anticipates that most LMS licensees will fit the definition of small 
    business or very small business.
        26. Small Business Definitions and Bidding Credits. The Commission 
    adopts two small business categories for the LMS auction: (1) a ``small 
    business'' category, for businesses with average gross revenues of over 
    $3 million but not to exceed $10 million; and (2) a ``very small 
    business'' category, for businesses with average gross revenues not to 
    exceed $3 million. These adopted categories will be based on the gross 
    revenues of the business for the three years preceding the filing of 
    the entity's application. The Commission will rely solely on gross 
    revenues, and not the number of employees, for the purpose of 
    determining an entity's eligibility for small incentives.
        27. Attribution of Gross Revenues and Affiliates. The Commission 
    adopted a ``controlling interest'' standard as the general attribution 
    rule for all future auctions. The Commission believes that these 
    definitions are consistent with its proposals in the Part 1 Third 
    Report and Order. 63 FR at 2315.
        28. Partitioning and Disaggregation. With respect to partitioning 
    and disaggregation, the Commission concludes that unjust enrichment 
    provisions should apply when a licensee has benefitted from the small 
    business provisions in the auction rules and applies to partition or 
    disaggregate a portion of the geographic license area to another entity 
    that would not qualify for such benefits.
    
    F. Report to Congress
    
        29. The Commission shall send a copy of the Second Report and 
    Order, including the FRFA, in a report to Congress pursuant to the 
    Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996. See 5 
    U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A). In addition, the Commission will send a copy of 
    the Second Report and Order, including FRFA, to the Chief Counsel for 
    advocacy of the Small Business Administration.
    
    III. Ordering Clauses
    
        30. Accordingly, it is ordered that part 90 of the Commission's 
    Rules is amended and will become effective September 28, 1998. It is 
    further ordered that 47 CFR 90.365(d) of the Commission's Rules is 
    amended and will become effective January 19, 1999.
        31. Authority for issuance of this Second Report and Order is 
    contained in Sections 4(i), 257, 303(r), and 309(j) of the 
    Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 257, 303(r), 
    and 309(j).
        32. It is further ordered that the Commission's Office of Public 
    Affairs, Reference Operations Division, shall send a copy of this 
    Second Report and Order, including the Final Regulatory Flexibility 
    Analysis, to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business 
    Administration.
    
    Paperwork Reduction Act Analysis
    
        33. The Second Report and Order contains an information collection. 
    The Federal Communications Commissions, as part of its continuing 
    effort to reduce paperwork burden invites the general public and other 
    Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment on the following 
    information collection, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 
    1995, Public Law 104-13. An agency may not conduct or sponsor a 
    collection of information unless it displays a currently valid control 
    number. No person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply 
    with a collection of information subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act 
    (PRA) that does not display a valid control number. Comments are 
    requested concerning (a) whether the collection of information is 
    necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the 
    Commission, including whether the information shall have practical 
    utility; (b) the accuracy of the Commission's burden estimate; (c) ways 
    to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information 
    collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of 
    information on the respondents, including the use of automated 
    collection techniques or other forms of information technology.
    
    [[Page 40663]]
    
        Supplementary information:
        OMB Approval Number: 3060-XXXX.
        Title: Construction requirements.
        Form No.: N/A
        Type of Review: New collection for construction period buildout 
    requirements.
        Respondents: Business and other for-profit entities, individuals or 
    households, State, Federal or Tribal Governments, Not-for-profit 
    entities.
        Number of Respondents: 528.
        Estimated Time for Response: Estimated total time for response 
    would be 52 hours per respondent for analysis of license records, 
    conducting the appropriate engineering surveys and studies, and 
    preparation of maps displaying the service area contour of the 
    licensee.
        Frequency of Response: On occasion.
        Total Annual Burden: 27,456 hours. 52 hours by 528 respondents.
        Needs and Uses: Engineering surveys and prepared maps displaying 
    the service area contour of the licensee. Surveys and maps will be used 
    to evaluate licensee's service area boundary and coverage. Licensee's 
    boundary and coverage will then be compared against the construction 
    buildout requirements for the service.
    
    DATES: Persons wishing to comment on this information collection should 
    submit comments by September 28, 1998.
    
    ADDRESSES: Direct all comments to Les Smith, Federal Communications 
    Commissions, Room 234, 1919 M St., N.W., Washington, DC 20554 or via 
    the Internet at lessmith@fcc.gov.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For additional information or copies 
    of the information collections contact Les Smith at (202) 418-0217 or 
    via the Internet at lessmith@fcc.gov. For all other questions contact 
    Ken Burnley, Auctions and Industry Analysis Division, Wireless 
    Telecommunications Bureau, at (202) 418-0660.
    
    Federal Communications Commission.
    Magalie Roman Salas,
    Secretary.
    
    Rule Changes
    
        Chapter I of Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations, part 90, 
    is amended as follows:
    
    PART 90--PRIVATE LAND MOBILE RADIO SERVICES
    
        1. The authority citation for part 90 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: Secs. 4, 251-2, 303, 309, and 332, 48 Stat. 1066, 
    1082, as amended; 47 U.S.C. 154, 251-2, 303, 309 and 332, unless 
    otherwise noted.
    
        2. Section 90.155 is amended by revising paragraph (d) to read as 
    follows:
    
    
    Sec. 90.155  Time in which station must be placed in operation.
    
    * * * * *
        (d) Multilateration LMS EA-licensees, authorized in accordance with 
    Sec. 90.353, must construct and place in operation a sufficient number 
    of base stations that utilize multilateration technology (see paragraph 
    (e) of this section) to provide multilateration location service to 
    one-third of the EA's population within five years of initial license 
    grant, and two-thirds of the population within ten years. In 
    demonstrating compliance with the construction and coverage 
    requirements, the Commission will allow licensees to individually 
    determine an appropriate field strength for reliable service, taking 
    into account the technologies employed in their system design and other 
    relevant technical factors. At the five and ten year benchmarks, 
    licensees will be required to file a map and other supporting 
    documentation showing compliance with the coverage requirements.
    * * * * *
        3. Section 90.365 is added to subpart M to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 90.365  Partitioned licenses and disaggregated spectrum.
    
        (a) Eligibility--(1) Parties seeking approval for partitioning and 
    disaggregation shall request an authorization for partial assignment of 
    a license pursuant to Sec. 90.153.
        (2) Multilateration LMS licensees may apply to partition their 
    licensed geographic service area or disaggregate their licensed 
    spectrum at any time following the grant of their licenses. 
    Multilateration LMS licensees may partition or disaggregate to any 
    party that is also eligible to be a multilateration LMS licensee. 
    Partitioning is permitted along any service area defined by the 
    parties, and spectrum may be disaggregated in any amount. The 
    Commission will also consider requests for partial assignment of 
    licenses that propose combinations of partitioning and disaggregation.
        (b) Technical Requirements--In the case of partitioning, requests 
    for authorization for partial assignment of a license must include, as 
    attachments, a description of the partitioned service area, and a 
    calculation of the population of the partitioned service area and the 
    licensed geographic service area. The partitioned service area shall be 
    defined by coordinate points at every three degrees along the 
    partitioned service area unless county lines are followed. The 
    geographic coordinates must be specified in degrees, minutes, and 
    seconds to the nearest second of latitude and longitude and must be 
    based upon the 1927 North American Datum (NAD27). Applicants may supply 
    geographical coordinates based on 1983 North American Datum (NAD83) in 
    addition to those required based on NAD27. In the case where county 
    lines are utilized, applicants need only list the specific area(s) 
    (through use of county names) that constitute the partitioned area.
        (c) License term. The license term for a partitioned license area, 
    and for disaggregated spectrum shall be the remainder of the original 
    licensee's license term.
        (d) Construction requirements--(1) Requirements for partitioning.
        (i) Parties seeking authority to partition must meet one of the 
    following construction requirements:
        (A) The partitionee may certify that it will satisfy the applicable 
    construction requirements for the partitioned license area; or
        (B) The original licensee may certify that it has or will meet the 
    construction requirement for the entire license area.
        (ii) Applications requesting authority to partition must include a 
    certification by each party as to which of the above construction 
    options they select.
        (iii) Failure by any partitionee to meet its respective 
    construction requirements will result in the automatic cancellation of 
    the partitioned or disaggregated license without further Commission 
    action.
        (2) Requirements for disaggregation. Parties seeking authority to 
    disaggregate must submit with their partial assignment application a 
    certification signed by both parties stating which of the parties will 
    be responsible for meeting the construction requirement for the 
    licensed market. Parties may agree to share responsibility for meeting 
    the construction requirements. Parties that accept responsibility for 
    meeting the construction requirements and later fail to do so will be 
    subject to license forfeiture without further Commission action.
        4. Add a new subpart X to read as follows:
    
    Subpart X--Competitive Bidding Procedures for Location and 
    Monitoring Service
    
    Sec.
    90.1101  Location and Monitoring Service subject to competitive 
    bidding.
    90.1103  Designated entities.
    
    [[Page 40664]]
    
    Subpart X--Competitive Bidding Procedures for Location and 
    Monitoring Service
    
    
    Sec. 90.1101  Location and Monitoring Service subject to competitive 
    bidding.
    
        Mutually exclusive initial applications for multilateration 
    Location and Monitoring Service licenses are subject to competitive 
    bidding procedures. The procedures set forth in part 1, subpart Q of 
    this chapter will apply unless otherwise provided in this part.
    
    
    Sec. 90.1103  Designated entities.
    
        (a) This section addresses certain issues concerning designated 
    entities in the Location and Monitoring Service (LMS) subject to 
    competitive bidding. Issues that are not addressed in this section are 
    governed by the designated entity provisions in part 1, subpart Q of 
    this chapter.
        (b) Eligibility for small business provisions.
        (1) A small business is an entity that, together with its 
    affiliates and controlling interests, has average gross revenues not to 
    exceed $15 million for the preceding three years.
        (2) A very small business is an entity that, together with its 
    affiliates and controlling interests, has average gross revenues not to 
    exceed $3 million for the preceding three years.
        (3) For purposes of determining whether an entity meets either of 
    the definitions set forth in paragraph (b)(1) or (b)(2) of this 
    section, the gross revenues of the entity, its affiliates, and 
    controlling interests shall be considered on a cumulative basis and 
    aggregated.
        (4) Where an applicant (or licensee) cannot identify controlling 
    interests under the standards set forth in this section, the gross 
    revenues of all interest holders in the applicant, and their 
    affiliates, will be attributable.
        (5) A consortium of small businesses (or a consortium of very small 
    businesses) is a conglomerate organization formed as a joint venture 
    between or among mutually independent business firms, each of which 
    individually satisfies the definition in paragraph (b)(1) of this 
    section (or each of which individually satisfies the definition in 
    paragraph (b)(2) of this section). Where an applicant or licensee is a 
    consortium of small businesses (or very small businesses), the gross 
    revenues of each small business (or very small business) shall not be 
    aggregated.
        (c) Controlling interest. (1) For purposes of this section, 
    controlling interest includes individuals or entities with de jure and 
    de facto control of the applicant. De jure control is greater than 50 
    percent of the voting stock of a corporation, or in the case of a 
    partnership, the general partner. De facto control is determined on a 
    case-by-case basis. An entity must disclose its equity interest and 
    demonstrate at least the following indicia of control to establish that 
    it retains de facto control of the applicant:
        (i) the entity constitutes or appoints more than 50 percent of the 
    board of directors or management committee;
        (ii) the entity has authority to appoint, promote, demote, and fire 
    senior executives that control the day-to-day activities of the 
    licensee; and
        (iii) the entity plays an integral role in management decisions.
        (2) Calculation of certain interests.
        (i) Ownership interests shall be calculated on a fully diluted 
    basis; all agreements such as warrants, stock options and convertible 
    debentures will generally be treated as if the rights thereunder 
    already have been fully exercised.
        (ii) Partnership and other ownership interests and any stock 
    interest equity, or outstanding stock, or outstanding voting stock 
    shall be attributed as specified below.
        (iii) Stock interests held in trust shall be attributed to any 
    person who holds or shares the power to vote such stock, to any person 
    who has the sole power to sell such stock, and, to any person who has 
    the right to revoke the trust at will or to replace the trustee at 
    will. If the trustee has a familial, personal, or extra-trust business 
    relationship to the grantor or the beneficiary, the grantor or 
    beneficiary, as appropriate, will be attributed with the stock 
    interests held in trust.
        (iv) Non-voting stock shall be attributed as an interest in the 
    issuing entity.
        (v) Limited partnership interests shall be attributed to limited 
    partners and shall be calculated according to both the percentage of 
    equity paid in and the percentage of distribution of profits and 
    losses.
        (vi) Officers and directors of an entity shall be considered to 
    have an attributable interest in the entity. The officers and directors 
    of an entity that controls a licensee or applicant shall be considered 
    to have an attributable interest in the licensee or applicant.
        (vii) Ownership interests that are held indirectly by any party 
    through one or more intervening corporations will be determined by 
    successive multiplication of the ownership percentages for each link in 
    the vertical ownership chain and application of the relevant 
    attribution benchmark to the resulting product, except that if the 
    ownership percentage for an interest in any link in the chain exceeds 
    50 percent or represents actual control, it shall be treated as if it 
    were a 100 percent interest.
        (viii) Any person who manages the operations of an applicant or 
    licensee pursuant to a management agreement shall be considered to have 
    an attributable interest in such applicant or licensee if such person, 
    or its affiliate pursuant to Sec. 1.2110(b)(4) of this chapter, has 
    authority to make decisions or otherwise engage in practices or 
    activities that determine, or significantly influence,
        (A) The nature or types of services offered by such an applicant or 
    licensee;
        (B) The terms upon which such services are offered; or
        (C) The prices charged for such services.
        (ix) Any licensee or its affiliate who enters into a joint 
    marketing arrangement with an applicant or licensee, or its affiliate, 
    shall be considered to have an attributable interest, if such applicant 
    or licensee, or its affiliate, has authority to make decisions or 
    otherwise engage in practices or activities that determine, or 
    significantly influence,
        (A) The nature or types of services offered by such an applicant or 
    licensee;
        (B) The terms upon which such services are offered; or
        (C) The prices charged for such services.
        (d) A winning bidder that qualifies as a small business or a 
    consortium of small businesses as defined in paragraph (b)(1) or (b)(5) 
    of this section may use the bidding credit specified in 
    Sec. 1.2110(e)(2)(ii) of this chapter. A winning bidder that qualifies 
    as a very small business or a consortium of very small businesses as 
    defined in paragraph (b)(2) or (b)(5) of this section may use the 
    bidding credit specified in Sec. 1.2110(e)(2)(i) of this chapter.
    
    [FR Doc. 98-20460 Filed 7-29-98; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
9/28/1998
Published:
07/30/1998
Department:
Federal Communications Commission
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
98-20460
Dates:
Effective September 28, 1998, except for Sec. 90.365(d) which will become effective January 19, 1999. Public and agency comments concerning the information collections contained in the Second Report and Order are due September 28, 1998.
Pages:
40659-40664 (6 pages)
Docket Numbers:
PR Docket No. 93-61, FCC 98-157
PDF File:
98-20460.pdf
CFR: (6)
47 CFR 1.2110(e)(2)(ii)
47 CFR 90.155
47 CFR 90.353
47 CFR 90.365
47 CFR 90.1101
More ...