[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 146 (Monday, July 31, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38994-38995]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-18700]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. CP95-613-000, et al.]
Florida Gas Transmission Company, et al.; Natural Gas Certificate
Filings
July 24, 1995.
Take notice that the following filings have been made with the
Commission:
1. Florida Gas Transmission Company
[Docket No. CP95-613-000]
Take notice that on July 13, 1995, Florida Gas Transmission Company
(FGT), 1400 Smith Street, P.O. Box 1188, Houston, Texas 77251-1188,
filed in Docket No. CP95-613-000 a request pursuant to Sections 157.205
and 157.212 of the Commission's Regulations under the Natural Gas Act
(18 CFR 157.205, 157.212) for authorization to construct and operate a
small volume metering facility for the City of Clearwater, under FGT's
blanket certificate issued in Docket No. CP82-553-000 pursuant to
Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act, all as more fully set forth in the
request that is on file with the Commission and open to public
inspection.
FGT proposes to construct and operate a new small volume facility
at the existing Clearwater North Station on the 4-inch Clearwater North
Lateral in Pinellas County, Florida. The proposed new metering facility
will serve as an additional delivery point to Clearwater under two
existing firm transportation service agreements pursuant to FGT's Rate
Schedules FTS-1 and FTS-2 and under an existing interruptible
transportation service agreement pursuant to FGT's Rate Schedule ITS-1.
FGT indicates that Clearwater would reimburse FGT for the construction
costs which is estimated to be $37,000.
Comment date: September 7, 1995, in accordance with Standard
Paragraph G at the end of this notice.
2. East Tennessee Natural Gas Company
[Docket No. CP95-622-000]
Take notice that on July 17, 1995, East Tennessee Natural Gas
Company (East Tennessee), a Tennessee Corporation, P.O. Box 2511,
Houston, Texas 77252, filed a request pursuant to Sections 157.205 and
157.212 of the Commission's Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18
CFR 157.205 and 157.212) and under its blanket authority granted
September 1, 1982, in Docket No. CP82-412-000, for authorization to
install a delivery point for continuing firm service to Dunlap Natural
Gas (Dunlap), a municipal corporation, located in Marion County,
Tennessee, all as more fully set forth in the request which is on file
with the Commission and open to public inspection.
Specifically, East Tennessee states that Dunlap is replacing its
distribution mainline and has requested East Tennessee to install a new
delivery station at M.P. 3211-1+1.54 in Marion County, Tennessee, to
replace existing station No. 75-9018 located at M.L.V. 3211-1. East
Tennessee proposes to install, own, and operate and maintain a two-inch
hot tap; approximately twenty-five feet of two-inch interconnecting
pipe, and measurement facilities, including electronic gas measurement
equipment. The hot tap and interconnecting pipe will be located on East
Tennessee's existing right-of-way. The measurement facilities will be
located on a site provided by Dunlap, adjacent to East Tennessee's
existing right-of-way.
East Tennessee states that the total quantities to be delivered to
Dunlap will not exceed the total quantities authorized. East Tennessee
asserts that the establishment of the proposed delivery point is not
prohibited by East Tennessee's tariff, and that it has sufficient
capacity to accomplish the deliveries at the proposed new delivery
point without detriment or disadvantage to any of East Tennessee's
other customers.
Comment date: September 7, 1995, in accordance with Standard
Paragraph G at the end of this notice.
3. Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America
[Docket No. CP95-624-000]
Take notice that on July 17, 1995, Natural Gas Pipeline Company of
America (Natural), 701 East 22nd Street, Lombard, Illinois 60148, filed
in Docket No. CP95-624-000 an application pursuant to Section 7(b) of
the Natural Gas Act for permission and approval to abandon by sale to
Lone Star Gas Company (Lone Star), one 10-inch meter and appurtenant
facilities in Fashing Field, Atascosa County, Texas, all as more fully
set forth in the application on file with the Commission and open to
public inspection.
Comment date: August 14, 1995, in accordance with Standard
Paragraph F at the end of this notice.
4. Northwest Pipeline Corporation
[Docket No. CP95-627-000]
Take notice that on July 19, 1995, Northwest Pipeline Corporation
(Northwest), 295 Chipeta Way, Salt Lake City, Utah 84158, filed a prior
notice request with the Commission in Docket No. CP95-627-000 pursuant
to Section 157.205 of the Commission's Regulations under the Natural
Gas Act (NGA) for authorization to construct and operate a cross-over
tie on the Grants Pass Lateral in Multnomah County, Oregon, under
Northwest's blanket certificate issued in Docket No. CP82-433-000
pursuant to Section 7 of the NGA, all as more fully set forth in the
request which is open to the public for inspection.
Northwest proposes to construct and operate a 3-inch tap, two 4-
inch regulators, a relief valve, and appurtenances on its 20-inch
diameter Grants Pass Lateral loop line as an additional tie-in for the
Reynolds Metal meter station. Northwest states that the proposed tie-in
would provide an alternate means of gas supply whenever the Grants Pass
Lateral line is out of service. Northwest also states that since it
needs to construct the proposed tie-in in order to maintain service to
Reynolds Metal whenever the Grants Pass Lateral line is out of service,
Northwest would pay the estimated $78,000 construction cost for the
facilities. Northwest further states that the design capacity and
delivery pressure of the meter station would not change as a result of
the proposed loop line tie-in.
Comment date: September 7, 1995, in accordance with Standard
Paragraph G at the end of this notice.
Standard Paragraphs
F. Any person desiring to be heard or to make any protest with
reference to said application should on or before the comment date,
file with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C.
20426, a motion to intervene or a protest in accordance with the
requirements of the Commission's Rules of Practice and
[[Page 38995]]
Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or 385.211) and the Regulations under the
Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.10). All protests filed with the Commission
will be considered by it in determining the appropriate action to be
taken but will not serve to make the protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party to a proceeding or to
participate as a party in any hearing therein must file a motion to
intervene in accordance with the Commission's Rules.
Take further notice that, pursuant to the authority contained in
and subject to the jurisdiction conferred upon the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission by Sections 7 and 15 of the Natural Gas Act and
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, a hearing will be
held without further notice before the Commission or its designee on
this application if no motion to intervene is filed within the time
required herein, if the Commission on its own review of the matter
finds that a grant of the certificate and/or permission and approval
for the proposed abandonment are required by the public convenience and
necessity. If a motion for leave to intervene is timely filed, or if
the Commission on its own motion believes that a formal hearing is
required, further notice of such hearing will be duly given.
Under the procedure herein provided for, unless otherwise advised,
it will be unnecessary for applicant to appear or be represented at the
hearing.
G. Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 45 days after
issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule
214 of the Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to
intervene or notice of intervention and pursuant to Section 157.205 of
the Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205) a protest to
the request. If no protest is filed within the time allowed therefor,
the proposed activity shall be deemed to be authorized effective the
day after the time allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is filed
and not withdrawn within 30 days after the time allowed for filing a
protest, the instant request shall be treated as an application for
authorization pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-18700 Filed 7-28-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
