95-16426. Cyfluthrin; Pesticide Tolerance  

  • [Federal Register Volume 60, Number 128 (Wednesday, July 5, 1995)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 34874-34876]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 95-16426]
    
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    40 CFR Part 180
    
    [PP 1F4026/R2147; FRL-4963-2]
    RIN 2070-AB78
    
    
    Cyfluthrin; Pesticide Tolerance
    
    AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
    
    ACTION: Final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This rule establishes a time-limited tolerance for residues of 
    the insecticide cyfluthrin (cyano(4-fluoro-3-phenoxyphenyl)methyl 3-
    (2,2-dichloroethenyl)-2,2-dimethylcyclopropanecarboxylate) in or on the 
    raw agricultural commodities corn, sweet (K+CWHR); corn, grain, field 
    and pop; and corn, forage and fodder, field, pop, and sweet at 0.01 
    part per million (ppm). The Agricultural Division of Miles, Inc., 
    submitted a petition under the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act 
    (FFDCA) to EPA for a regulation to establish a maximum permissible 
    level for residues of the insecticide.
    
    EFFECTIVE DATE: This regulation becomes effective July 5, 1995.
    
    ADDRESSES: Written objections and hearing requests, identified by the 
    document control number, [PP 1F4026/R2147], may be submitted to: 
    Hearing Clerk (1900), Environmental Protection Agency, Rm. M3708, 401 M 
    St., SW., Washington, DC 20460. Fees accompanying objections shall be 
    labeled ``Tolerance Petition Fees'' and forwarded to: EPA Headquarters 
    Accounting Operations Branch, OPP (Tolerance Fees), P.O. Box 360277M, 
    Pittsburgh, PA 15251. A copy of any objections and hearing requests 
    filed with the Hearing Clerk should be identified by the document 
    control number and submitted to: Public Response and Program Resources 
    Branch, Field Operations Division (7506C), Office of Pesticide 
    Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M St., SW., Washington, 
    DC 20460. In person, bring copy of objections and hearing requests to 
    Rm. 1132, CM #2, 1921 Jefferson Davis Hwy., Arlington, VA 22202.
        A copy of objections and hearing requests filed with the Hearing 
    Clerk may also be submitted electronically by sending electronic mail 
    (e-mail) to: opp-docket@epamail.epa.gov. Copies of objections and 
    hearing requests must be submitted as an ASCII file avoiding the use of 
    special characters and any form of encryption. Copies of objections and 
    hearing requests will also be accepted on disks in WordPerfect in 5.1 
    file format or ASCII file format. All copies of objections and hearing 
    requests in electronic form must be identified by the docket number [PP 
    1F4026/R2147]. No Confidential Business Information (CBI) should be 
    submitted through e-mail. Electronic copies of objections and hearing 
    requests on this rule may be filed online at many Federal Depository 
    Libraries. Additional information on electronic submissions can be 
    found below in this document.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: By mail: Robert A. Forrest, Product 
    Manager (PM) 14, Registration Division (7505C), Office of Pesticide 
    Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M St., SW., Washington, 
    DC 20460. Office location and telephone number: Rm. 219, CM #2, 1921 
    Jefferson Davis Hwy., Arlington, VA 22202, (703)-305-6600; e-mail: 
    forrest.robert@epamail.epa.gov.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA issued a notice, published in the 
    Federal Register of April 5, 1995 (60 FR 17356), which announced that 
    Miles, Inc., P.O. Box 4913, Kansas City, MO 64120, had submitted a 
    pesticide petition, PP 1F4026, to EPA requesting that the 
    Administrator, pursuant to section 408(d) of the Federal Food, Drug, 
    and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), 21 U.S.C. 346a(d), establish a tolerance for 
    residues of the insecticide cyfluthrin, cyano (4-fluoro-2-
    phenoxyphenyl)methyl-3-(2,2-dichloroethyl)-2,2-
    dimethylcyclopropanecarboxylate, in or on the raw agricultural 
    commodities corn, fresh; corn, grain, field and pop; and corn, forage 
    and fodder, field, pop, and sweet at 0.01 part per million (ppm). For 
    consistency, the raw agricultural commodity corn, fresh is expressed as 
    corn, sweet (K+CWHR).
        There were no comments received in response to the notice of 
    filing. The scientific data submitted in the petition and other 
    relevant material have been evaluated. The toxicological data 
    considered in support of the tolerance include:
        1. Several acute toxicological studies placing the technical grade 
    of the insecticide in toxicity category 1 (acute oral); 3 (acute dermal 
    and primary eye irritation); 2 (acute inhalation) and 4 (primary dermal 
    irritation). It is not a dermal sensitizer.
        2. A 21-day rabbit dermal study with a no-observed-effect level 
    (NOEL) greater than 250 mg/kg/day (highest dose tested).
        3. A 21-day rat inhalation study with a NOEL of 0.0014 mg/L in 
    which a decrease in body weight gain was observed.
        4. A 90-day rat inhalation study with a NOEL of 0.00009 mg/L/day. 
    Systemic effects observed included unthriftiness, unkept fur, lethargy, 
    and increased urinary protein.
        5. A chronic dog-feeding study with a NOEL of 4.0 mg/kg/day. 
    Systemic effects of slight ataxia, increased vomiting, diarrhea, and 
    decreased male body weights were observed at the lowest-effect level 
    (LEL).
        6. A two-year rat feeding/carcinogenicity study with a systemic 
    NOEL of 2.5 mg/kg/day. Decreased body weights in males and inflammatory 
    foci in kidneys of females were observed at the lowest-observed-effect 
    level (LOEL) of 7.5 mg/kg/day. There was no evidence of carcinogenicity 
    under conditions of the study. Levels tested were 50, 150, and 450 ppm.
    
    [[Page 34875]]
    
        7. A chronic mouse feeding/carcinogenicity study with a systemic 
    NOEL of less than 7.5 mg/kg/day (lowest dose tested) in which increased 
    alkaline phosphatase activity in males was observed. There was no 
    evidence of carcinogenicity under conditions of the study. Levels 
    tested were 50, 200, and 800 ppm.
        8. A three-generation rat reproduction study with a NOEL of 7.5 mg/
    kg/day for reproductive effects and a systemic NOEL of 2.5 mg/kg/day. 
    Decreased viability and decreased pup body weights were observed. 
    Levels tested were 50, 150, and 450 ppm.
        9. A rat oral developmental study with no clinical signs resulting 
    from the test article. Levels tested were 1, 3, and 10 mg/kg/day.
        A second rat oral developmental study with a maternal NOEL of 3 mg/
    kg/day and a LOEL of 10 mg/kg/day (high-stepping gait, occasional 
    ataxia, and reduced motility). There were no developmental effects. 
    Levels tested were 3, 10, and 30 mg/kg/day.
        10. A rabbit oral developmental study with a developmental NOEL and 
    LOEL of 20 mg/kg/day and 60 mg/kg/day, respectively, in which increased 
    numbers of resorptions and percent incidence of postimplantation loss 
    were observed at the LOEL. The maternal NOEL and LOEL were 20 mg/kg/day 
    and 60 mg/kg/day, respectively, with decreased body weight gain and 
    food consumption observed at the LOEL. Levels tested were 20, 60, and 
    180 mg/kg/day administered by gavage on gestational days 6 to 18, 
    inclusively.
        11. A rat inhalation developmental study with a developmental NOEL 
    and LOEL of 0.00059 mg/L and 0.0011 mg/L, respectively, with 
    unspecified sternal anomalies and increased runt incidence observed at 
    the LOEL. The maternal NOEL and LOEL were 0.0011 mg/L and 0.0047 mg/L, 
    respectively, with reduced motility, dyspnea, piloerection, ungroomed 
    coats, and eye irritation observed at the LOEL.
        12. A rat inhalation developmental study with a NOEL and LOEL of 
    0.46 and 2.55 mg/m3, respectively, with reduced fetal and 
    placental weight, reduced ossification in the phalanx, metacarpals and 
    vertebrae observed at the LOEL. The maternal LOEL was less than 0.46 
    mg/m3 with decreased body weight gain and reduced relative food 
    efficiency observed at this dose level.
        13. Mutagenicity studies including a CHO/HGPRT gene mutation test, 
    a structural chromosome aberration: sister chromatid exchange, and an 
    unscheduled DNA synthesis, which were all negative for mutagenic 
    effects.
        14. Two metabolism studies in rats showing that the test material 
    was rapidly and nearly completely absorbed and that the radioactivity 
    was rapidly and nearly completely excreted in the urine and feces by 48 
    hours. The studies showed that the parent is cleaved at the ester bond 
    and then oxidized to yield 3-phenoxy-4-fluorobenzoic acid. This 
    intermediate is then either hydroxylated and subsequently conjugated 
    and excreted, or first bound to glycine and then hydroxylated, 
    conjugated, and excreted.
        The Reference Dose (RfD) is established at 0.025 mg/kg day, based 
    on an NOEL of 2.5 mg/kg/day from the 2-year rat feeding study and an 
    uncertainty factor of 100. The Theoretical Maximum Residue Contribution 
    (TMRC) from established tolerances and the current action is estimated 
    at 0.002730 mg/kg bwt/day and utilizes 11.0 percent of the RfD for the 
    U.S. population. The TMRC for the subgroup most highly exposed, 
    nonnursing infants less than 1-year old, utilizes 32.0 percent of the 
    RfD.
        Because there was a sign of developmental effects seen in animal 
    studies, the Agency used the rabbit developmental toxicity study with a 
    maternal NOEL of 20 mg/kg/day to assess acute dietary exposure and 
    determine a margin of exposure (MOE) for the overall U.S. population 
    and certain subgroups. Since the toxicological end-point pertains to 
    developmental toxicity, the population group of concern for this 
    analysis is women aged 13 and above, the subgroup which most closely 
    approximates women of child-bearing age. The MOE is calculated as the 
    ratio of the NOEL to the exposure. For this analysis the Agency 
    calculated the MOE for women aged 13 and above to be 1,250. Generally 
    speaking, MOE's greater than 100 for data derived from animal studies 
    are acceptable to the Agency.
        The nature of the residues in plants is adequately understood. The 
    nature of residue in animals is adequately understood for the purpose 
    of the requested tolerances. An adequate analytical method, gas 
    chromatography, is available for enforcement purposes.
        The enforcement methodology has been submitted to the Food and Drug 
    Administration for publication in the Pesticide Analytical Manual, 
    Volume II (PAM). Because of the long lead time for publication of the 
    method in PAM II, the analytical methodology is being made available in 
    the interim to anyone interested in pesticide enforcement when 
    requested from: Calvin Furlow, Public Response and Program Resources 
    Branch, Field Operations Division (7506C), Office of Pesticide 
    Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M St., SW., Washington, 
    DC 20460. Office location and telephone number: Rm. 1132, CM #2, 1921 
    Jefferson Davis Highway, Arlington, VA 22202, (703)-305-5232.
        Any secondary residues occurring in milk and the meat, fat, and 
    meat by-products (mbyp) of cattle, goats, hogs, horses, and sheep will 
    fall within existing tolerances for these commodities. There is no 
    reasonable expectation that secondary residues will occur in eggs, and 
    the meat, fat, and mbyp of poultry as a result of this action. The 
    pesticide is considered useful for the purpose for which the tolerance 
    is sought.
        To be consistent with the conditional registration and the 
    regulation for establishing a time-limited tolerance for residues of 
    another insecticide, O-[2-(1,1-dimethlyethyl)-5-pyrimidinyl] O-ethyl-O-
    (1-methylethyl) phosphorothioate, which are being issued both in 
    conjunction with, and concurrently with, this regulation, the Agency is 
    limiting the period of time that the regulation is to be in effect. The 
    conditional registration is for a product consisting of cyfluthrin in 
    combination with the other insecticide as the two active ingredients. 
    Upon receipt and evaluation of the additional data/information required 
    as a condition of the time-limited tolerance for the other insecticide 
    and of the conditional registration for the use of these two 
    insecticides on corn, the Agency will reassess the tolerances and the 
    registration and, if appropriate, will issue permanent tolerances and 
    an unconditional registration for the insecticides on corn.
        There are currently no actions pending against the continued 
    registration of this chemical.
        Elsewhere in this issue of the Federal Register, the Agency is 
    concurrently issuing a notice of conditional registration for the use 
    of the combination product on corn and for a time-limited tolerance for 
    residues of the other insecticide referenced above in/on corn 
    commodities.
        Based on the information and data considered, the Agency has 
    determined that the tolerance established by amending 40 CFR 180.436 
    will protect the public health. Therefore, the tolerance is established 
    as set forth below.
        Any person adversely affected by this regulation may, within 30 
    days after publication of this document in the Federal Register, file 
    written objections to the regulation and may also request a hearing on 
    those objections. 
    
    [[Page 34876]]
    Objections and hearing requests must be filed with the Hearing Clerk, 
    at the address given above (40 CFR 178.20). A copy of the objections 
    and/or hearing requests filed with the Hearing Clerk should be 
    submitted to the OPP docket for this rulemaking. The objections 
    submitted must specify the provisions of the regulation deemed 
    objectionable and the grounds for the objections (40 CFR 178.25). Each 
    objection must be accompanied by the fee prescribed by 40 CFR 
    180.33(i). If a hearing is requested, the objections must include a 
    statement of the factual issue(s) on which a hearing is requested, the 
    requestor's contentions on such issues, and a summary of any evidence 
    relied upon by the objector (40 CFR 178.27). A request for a hearing 
    will be granted if the Administrator determines that the material 
    submitted shows the following: There is genuine and substantial issue 
    of fact; there is a reasonable possibility that available evidence 
    identified by the requestor would, if established, resolve one or more 
    of such issues in favor of the requestor, taking into account 
    uncontested claims or facts to the contrary; and resolution of the 
    factual issue(s) in the manner sought by the requestor would be 
    adequate to justify the action requested (40 CFR 178.32).
        A record has been established for this rulemaking under docket 
    number [PP 1F4026/R2147] (including objections and hearing requests 
    submitted electronically as described below). A public version of this 
    record, including printed, paper versions of electronic comments, which 
    does not include any information claimed as CBI, is available for 
    inspection from 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding 
    legal holidays. The public record is located in Room 1132 of the Public 
    Response and Program Resources Branch, Field Operations Division 
    (7506C), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 
    Crystal Mall #2, 1921 Jefferson Davis Highway, Arlington, VA.
        Written objections and hearing requests, identified by the document 
    control number [PP 1F4026/R2147], may be submitted to the Hearing Clerk 
    (1900), Environmental Protection Agency, Rm. 3708, 401 M St., SW., 
    Washington, DC 20460.
        A copy of electronic objections and hearing requests filed with the 
    Hearing Clerk can be sent directly to EPA at:
        opp-Docket@epamail.epa.gov
    
    
        A copy of electronic objections and hearing requests filed with the 
    Hearing Clerk must be submitted as an ASCII file avoiding the use of 
    special characters and any form of encryption.
        The official record for this rulemaking, as well as the public 
    version, as described above will be kept in paper form. Accordingly, 
    EPA will transfer any objections and hearing requests received 
    electronically into printed, paper form as they are received and will 
    place the paper copies in the official rulemaking record which will 
    also include all objections and hearing requests submitted directly in 
    writing. The official rulemaking record is the paper record maintained 
    at the address in ``ADDRESSES'' at the beginning of this document.
        Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), the 
    Agency must determine whether the regulatory action is ``significant'' 
    and therefore subject to all the requirements of the Executive Order 
    (i.e., Regulatory Impact Analysis, review by the Office of Management 
    and Budget (OMB)). Under section 3(f), the order defines 
    ``significant'' as those actions likely to lead to a rule (1) having an 
    annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more, or adversely and 
    materially affecting a sector of the economy, productivity, 
    competition, jobs, the environment, public health or safety, or State, 
    local or tribal governments or communities (also known as 
    ``economically significant''); (2) creating serious inconsistency or 
    otherwise interfering with an action taken or planned by another 
    agency; (3) materially altering the budgetary impacts of entitlement, 
    grants, user fees, or loan programs; or (4) raising novel legal or 
    policy issues arising out of legal mandates, the President's 
    priorities, or the principles set forth in this Executive Order.
        Pursuant to the terms of this Executive Order, EPA has determined 
    that this rule is not ``significant'' and is therefore not subject to 
    OMB review.
        Pursuant to the requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act 
    (Pub. L. 96-354, 94 Stat. 1164, 5 U.S.C. 601-612), the Administrator 
    has determined that regulations establishing new tolerances or raising 
    tolerance levels or establishing exemptions from tolerance requirements 
    do not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of 
    small entities. A certification statement to this effect was published 
    in the Federal Register of May 4, 1981 (46 FR 24950).
    
    List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
    
        Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, 
    Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and 
    recordkeeping requirements.
    
        Dated: June 23, 1995.
    
    Daniel M. Barolo,
    
    Director, Office of Pesticide Programs.
    
        Therefore, 40 CFR part 180 is amended as follows:
    
    PART 180--[AMENDED]
    
        1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as 
    follows:
    
        Authority: 21 U.S.C. 346a and 371.
    
        2. In Sec. 180.436, by designating the existing text as paragraph 
    (a) and adding new paragraph (b), to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 180.436  Cyfluthrin; tolerances for residues.
    
        (a) *  *  *
        (b) Time-limited tolerances are established for residues of the 
    insecticide cyfluthrin (cyano(4-fluoro-3-phenoxyphenyl)methyl 3-(2,2-
    dichloroethenyl)-2,2-dimethylcyclopropanecarboxylate; CAS Reg. No 
    68359-37-5) in or on the following raw agricultural commodities:
    
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                     Parts per    Expiration
                       Commodity                      million        date   
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Corn, forage and fodder, field, pop, and sweet         0.01      July 5,
                                                                        1999
    Corn, grain, field and pop....................         0.01          Do.
    Corn, sweet (K+CWHR)..........................         0.01          Do.
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    [FR Doc. 95-16426 Filed 7-3-95; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6560-50-F
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
7/5/1995
Published:
07/05/1995
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
95-16426
Dates:
This regulation becomes effective July 5, 1995.
Pages:
34874-34876 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
PP 1F4026/R2147, FRL-4963-2
RINs:
2070-AB78
PDF File:
95-16426.pdf
CFR: (1)
40 CFR 180.436