95-16429. Imidacloprid; Pesticide Tolerance  

  • [Federal Register Volume 60, Number 128 (Wednesday, July 5, 1995)]
    [Proposed Rules]
    [Pages 34943-34945]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 95-16429]
    
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    40 CFR Part 180
    
    [PP 5E4425/P619; FRL-4962-5]
    RIN 2070-AC18
    
    
    Imidacloprid; Pesticide Tolerance
    
    AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
    
    ACTION: Proposed rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: EPA proposes to establish a tolerance for residues of the 
    insecticide (1-[6-chloro-3-pyridinyl)methyl]-N-nitro-2-
    imidazolidinimine (referred to in this document as imidacloprid) and 
    its metabolites in or on the raw agricultural commodity dried hops. The 
    Interregional Research Project No. 4 (IR-4) requested pursuant to the 
    Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA) the proposed regulation to 
    establish a maximum permissible level for residues of the insecticide.
    
    DATES: Comments identified by the document control number, [PP 5E4425/
    P619], must be received on or before August 4, 1995..
    
    ADDRESSES: By mail, submit written comments to: Public Response and 
    Program Resources Branch, Field Operations Division (7506C), Office of 
    Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M St., SW., 
    Washington, DC 20460. In person, bring comments to: Rm. 1132, CM #2, 
    1921 Jefferson Davis Highway, Arlington, VA 22202. Information 
    submitted as a comment concerning this document may be claimed 
    confidential by marking any part or all of that information as 
    ``Confidential Business Information''. CBI should not be submitted 
    through e-mail. Information marked as CBI will not be disclosed except 
    in accordance with procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2. A copy of the 
    comment that does not contain CBI must be submitted for inclusion in 
    the public record. Information not marked confidential may be disclosed 
    publicly by EPA without prior notice. All written comments will be 
    available for public inspection in Rm. 1132 at the address given above, 
    from 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal 
    holidays.
        Comments and data may also be submitted electronically by sending 
    electronic mail (e-mail) to: opp-docket@epamail.epa.gov. Electronic 
    comments must be submitted as an ASCII file avoiding the use of special 
    characters and any form of encryption. Comments and data will also be 
    accepted on disks in WordPerfect 5.1 file format or ASCII file format. 
    All comments and data in electronic form must be identified by the 
    docket number [PP 5E4425/P619]. Electronic comments on this proposed 
    rule may be filed online at many Federal Depository Libraries. 
    Additional information on electronic submissions can be found in the 
    ``SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION'' section of this document.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: By mail: Hoyt L. Jamerson, 
    Registration Division (7505W), Office of Pesticide Programs, 
    Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M St. SW., Washington, DC 20460. 
    Office location and telephone number: Sixth Floor, Crystal Station #1, 
    2800 Jefferson Davis Highway, Arlington, VA 22202, (703)-308-8783; e-
    mail: jamerson.hoyt@epamail.epa.gov.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Interregional Research Project No. 4 
    (IR-4), New Jersey Agricultural Experiment Station, P.O. Box 231, 
    Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08903, has submitted pesticide 
    petition (PP) 5E4425 to EPA on behalf of the Agricultural Experiment 
    Stations of Oregon and Washington. This petition requests that the 
    Administrator, pursuant to section 408(e) of the Federal Food, Drug, 
    and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), 21 U.S.C. 346a(e), amend 40 CFR 180.472 by 
    establishing a tolerance for residues of the insecticide imidacloprid 
    (1-[(6-chloro-3-pyridinyl)methyl]-N-nitro-2-imidazolidinimine) and its 
    metabolites containing the 6-chloropyridinyl moiety, all expressed as 
    1-[(6-chloro-3-pyridinyl)-methyl]-N-nitro-2-imidazolidinimine, in or on 
    the raw agricultural commodity dried hops at 6 parts per million (ppm).
        In the Federal Register of June 28, 1994 (59 FR 33204), EPA 
    established a time-limited tolerance for residues of imidacloprid on 
    dried hops at 3.0 ppm. The imidacloprid tolerance for dried hops was 
    established to expire on June 28, 1995, to allow IR-4 sufficient time 
    to conduct additional residue field trials in support of a permanent 
    tolerance for this use. Subsequently, IR-4 submitted the data from the 
    residue field trials and petition 5E4425 in support of a permanent 
    tolerance, but EPA extended the time-limited tolerance to expire on 
    June 28, 1996 (60 FR 24784, May 10, 1995), when it became apparent that 
    the IR-4 proposed tolerance could not be established prior to the June 
    28, 1995 expiration date. The IR-4 residue data have been reviewed and 
    determined to be adequate to support a permanent tolerance for 
    imidacloprid on dried hops at 6 ppm.
        The toxicological data considered in support of the proposed 
    tolerance include:
        1. A 1-year chronic feeding study in dogs fed diets containing 0, 
    200, 500, or 1,250/2,500 ppm (average intake was 0, 6.1, 15, or 41/72 
    milligrams (mg)/kilogram (kg)/day) with a noobserved-effect level of 
    1,250 ppm based on increased plasma cholesterol and liver cytochrome P-
    450 levels in dogs at the 2,500-ppm dose level. The high dose was 
    increased to 2,500 ppm (72 mg/kg/day) from week 17 onward due to lack 
    of toxicity at the 1,250-dose level.
        2. A 2-year feeding/carcinogenicity study in rats fed diets 
    containing 0, 100, 300, 900, or 1,800 ppm with a NOEL for chronic 
    effects at 100 ppm (5.7 mg/kg/day in males, 7.6 mg/kg/day in females) 
    that included decreased body weight gain in females at 300 ppm (24.9 
    mg/kg/day) and above; and increased thyroid 
    
    [[Page 34944]]
    lesions in males at 300 ppm (16.9 mg/kg/day) and above, and in females 
    at 900 ppm (73 mg/kg/day) and above. There were no apparent 
    carcinogenic effects under the conditions of the study.
        3. A 2-year carcinogenicity study in mice fed diets containing 0, 
    100, 330, 1,000, or 2,000 ppm with a NOEL of 1,000 ppm (208 mg/kg/day 
    in males, 274 mg/kg/day in females) based on decreased food consumption 
    and decreased water intake at the 2,000-ppm dose level. There were no 
    apparent carcinogenic effects observed under the conditions of this 
    study.
        4. A three-generation reproduction study with rats feed diets 
    containing 0, 100, 250, or 700 ppm with a reproductive no-observed-
    effect level (NOEL) of 100 ppm (equivalent to 8 mg/kg/day based on 
    decreased pup body weight observed at the 250-ppm dose level.
        5. A developmental toxicity study in rat given gavage doses at 0, 
    10, 30, or 100 mg/kg/day during gestation days 6 to 16 with a NOEL for 
    developmental toxicity at 30 mg/kg/day based on increased wavy ribs 
    observed at the 100 mg/kg/day dose level.
        6. A developmental toxicity study in rabbits given gavage doses at 
    0, 8, 24, or 72 mg/kg/day during gestation days 6 through 19 with a 
    NOEL for developmental toxicity at 24 mg/kg/day based on decreased body 
    weight and increased skeletal abnormalities observed at the 72 mg/kg/
    day dose level.
        7. Imidacloprid, which was tested in a battery of 23 mutagenic 
    assays, was negative for mutagenic effects in all but two of the 
    assays. Imidacloprid tested positive for chromosome aberrations in an 
    in vitro cytogenetic study with human lymphocytes for the detection of 
    induced clastogenic effects, and for genotoxicity in an in vitro 
    cytogenetic assay measuring sister chromatid exchange in Chinese 
    hamster ovary cells.
        Dietary risk assessments for imidacloprid indicate that there is 
    minimal risk from established tolerances and the proposed tolerance for 
    dried hops. A cancer risk assessment is not appropriate for 
    imidacloprid since the pesticide is assigned to ``Group E'' (evidence 
    of noncarcinogenicity for humans) of EPA's cancer classification 
    system. Dietary risk assessments for the pesticide were conducted using 
    the Reference Dose (RfD) to assess chronic exposure and risk and the 
    Margin of Exposure (MOE) for acute toxicity.
        The RfD is calculated at 0.057 mg/kg/of body weight/day based on a 
    NOEL of 5.7 mg/kg/day from the 2-year rat feeding/carcinogenicity study 
    and 100-fold uncertainty factor. The theoretical maximum residue 
    contribution (TMRC) from existing tolerances and the proposed tolerance 
    for dried hops utilizes less than 5 percent of the RfD for the general 
    population and 26 percent of the RfD for nonnursing infants less than 
    one year in age.
        The MOE is a measure of how closely the high end acute dietary 
    exposure comes to the no-observed-effect level from the toxicity 
    endpoint of concern. For imidacloprid the MOE was calculated as a ratio 
    of the NOEL (24 mg/kg/day) from the rabbit developmental toxicity study 
    to dietary exposure, as estimated for the population subgroup at 
    greatest risk (females of childbearing age). The MOE for this subgroup 
    is estimated at 2500 for high-end exposure. Acute dietary margins of 
    exposure of less than 100 are generally of concern to EPA. A MOE of 
    2,500 poses minimal risk.
        Established tolerances for meat, milk, poultry, and eggs are 
    adequate to cover secondary residues resulting from the feeding of 
    spent hops to livestock.
        The metabolism of imidacloprid in plants and animals is adequately 
    understood. An adequate analytical method is available for enforcement 
    purposes. The enforcement method has been submitted to the Food and 
    Drug Administration for publication in the Pesticide Analytical Manual, 
    Volume II (PAM II). Because of the long lead time for publication of 
    the method in PAM II, the analytical method is being made available in 
    the interim to any one interest in pesticide enforcement when requested 
    from: Calvin Furlow, Public Response and Program Resources Branch, 
    Field Operations Divisions (7506C), Office of Pesticide Programs, 
    Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M St., SW., Washington, DC 20460. 
    Office location and telephone number: Rm. 1130A, CM #2, 1921 Jefferson 
    Davis Hwy., Arlington, VA 22202, (703)-305-5937.
        There are currently no actions pending against the continued 
    registration of this chemical.
        Based on the information and data considered, the Agency has 
    determined that the tolerance established by amending 40 CFR part 180 
    would protect the public health. Therefore, it is proposed that the 
    tolerance be established as set forth below.
        Any person who has registered or submitted an application for 
    registration of a pesticide, under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, 
    and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) as amended, which contains any of the 
    ingredients listed herein, may request within 30 days after publication 
    of this notice in the Federal Register that this rulemaking proposal be 
    referred to an Advisory Committee in accordance with section 408(e) of 
    the FFDCA.
        A record has been established for this rulemaking under docket 
    number [PP 5E4425/P619] (including comments and data submitted 
    electronically as described below). A public version of this record, 
    including printed, paper versions of electronic comments, which does 
    not include any information claimed as CBI, is available for inspection 
    from 8 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. 
    The public record is located in Rm. 1132 of the Public Response and 
    Program Resources Branch, Field Operations Division (7506C), Office of 
    Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, Crystal Mall #2, 
    1921 Jefferson Davis Highway, Arlington, VA.
        Electronic comments can be sent directly to EPA at:
        opp-Docket@epamail.epa.gov
        Electronic comments must be submitted as an ASCII file avoiding the 
    use of special characters and any form of encryption.
        The official record for this rulemaking, as well as the public 
    version, as described above will be kept in paper form. Accordingly, 
    EPA will transfer all comments received electronically into printed, 
    paper form as they are received and will place the paper copies in the 
    official rulemaking record which will also include all comments 
    submitted directly in writing. The official rulemaking record is the 
    paper record maintained at the address in ``ADDRESSES'' at the 
    beginning of this document.
        Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, Oct. 4, 1993), the Agency 
    must determine whether the regulatory action is ``significant'' and 
    therefore subject to all the requirements of the Executive Order (i.e., 
    Regulatory Impact Analysis, review by the Office of Management and 
    Budget (OMB)). Under section 3(f), the order defines ``significant'' as 
    those actions likely to lead to a rule (1) having an annual effect on 
    the economy of $100 million or more, or adversely and materially 
    affecting a sector of the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the 
    environment, public health or safety, or State, local or tribal 
    governments or communities (also known as ``economically 
    significant''); (2) creating serious inconsistency or otherwise 
    interfering with an action taken or planned by another agency; (3) 
    materially altering the budgetary impacts of entitlement, grants, user 
    fees, or loan programs; or (4) raising novel legal or policy issues 
    arising out of legal 
    
    [[Page 34945]]
    mandates, the President's priorities, or the principles set forth in 
    this Executive Order.
        Pursuant to the terms of this Executive Order, EPA has determined 
    that this rule is not ``significant'' and is therefore not subject to 
    OMB review.
        Pursuant to the requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act 
    (Pub. L. 96-354, 94 Stat. 1164, 5 U.S.C. 601-612), the Administrator 
    has determined that regulations establishing new tolerances or raising 
    tolerance levels or establishing exemptions from tolerance requirements 
    do not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of 
    small entities. A certification statement to this effect was published 
    in the Federal Register of May 4, 1981 (46 FR 24950).
    
    List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
    
        Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, 
    Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and 
    recordkeeping requirements.
    
    Dated: June 23, 1995.
    
    Peter Caulkins,
    
    Acting Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.
    
        Therefore, it is proposed that 40 CFR part 180 be amended as 
    follows:
    
    PART 180--[AMENDED]
    
        1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as 
    follows:
    
        Authority: 21 U.S.C. 346a and 371.
    
        2. In Sec. 180.472, paragraph (a) is amended in the table therein 
    by adding and alphabetically inserting dried hops, and paragraph (d) is 
    removed, as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 180.472   1-[(6-Chloro-3-pyridinyl)methyl]-N-nitro-2-
    imidazolidinimine; tolerances for residues.
    
        (a) *  *  *
    
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                  Parts per 
                             Commodity                             million  
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                            
                      *        *        *        *        *                 
    Hops, dried................................................            6
                                                                            
                      *        *        *        *        *                 
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    *      *      *      *      *
    
    [FR Doc. 95-16429 Filed 7-3-95; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6560-50-F
    
    

Document Information

Published:
07/05/1995
Department:
Environmental Protection Agency
Entry Type:
Proposed Rule
Action:
Proposed rule.
Document Number:
95-16429
Dates:
Comments identified by the document control number, [PP 5E4425/ P619], must be received on or before August 4, 1995..
Pages:
34943-34945 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
PP 5E4425/P619, FRL-4962-5
RINs:
2070-AC18
PDF File:
95-16429.pdf
CFR: (1)
40 CFR 180.472