95-16524. Virginia Electric and Power Company; Notice of Consideration of Issuance of a Materials License for the Storage of Spent Fuel and Notice of Opportunity for a Hearing  

  • [Federal Register Volume 60, Number 129 (Thursday, July 6, 1995)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 35237-35239]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 95-16524]
    
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
    
    [Docket Nos. 72-16, 50-338/339]
    
    
    Virginia Electric and Power Company; Notice of Consideration of 
    Issuance of a Materials License for the Storage of Spent Fuel and 
    Notice of Opportunity for a Hearing
    
        The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the NRC) is considering an 
    application dated May 9, 1995, for a materials 
    
    [[Page 35238]]
    license, under the provisions of 10 CFR Part 72, from Virginia Electric 
    and Power Company (the applicant or VEPCO) to possess spent fuel and 
    other radioactive materials associated with spent fuel storage in an 
    independent spent fuel storage installation (ISFSI) located in Louisa 
    County, Virginia. If granted the license will authorize the applicant 
    to store spent fuel in a dry storage cask system at the applicant's 
    North Anna Nuclear Power Plant site for Units 1 and 2, (Operating 
    Licenses NPF-4 and 7). Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR Part 72, 
    the term of the license for the ISFSI would be twenty (20) years.
        Prior to issuance of the requested license, the NRC will have made 
    the findings required by the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (the 
    Act), and the NRC's rules and regulations. The issuance of the 
    materials license will not be approved until the NRC has reviewed the 
    application and has concluded that approval of the license will not be 
    inimical to the common defense and security and will not constitute an 
    unreasonable risk to the health and safety of the public. The NRC will 
    complete an environmental evaluation, in accordance with 10 CFR Part 
    51, to determine if the preparation of an environmental impact 
    statement is warranted or if an environmental assessment and Finding of 
    No Significant Impact are appropriate. This action will be the subject 
    of a subsequent notice in the Federal Register. Pursuant to 10 CFR 
    2.105 and 2.1107, by August 7, 1995, the applicant may file a request 
    for a hearing; and any person whose interest may be affected by this 
    proceeding and who wishes to participate as a party in the proceeding 
    must file a written request for a hearing and a petition for leave to 
    intervene with respect to the subject materials license in accordance 
    with the provisions of 10 CFR 2.714. If a request for hearing or 
    petition for leave to intervene is filed by the above date, the NRC or 
    an Atomic Safety and Licensing Board designated by the Commission or by 
    the Chairman of the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel will rule 
    on the request and/or petition, and the Secretary or the designated 
    Atomic Safety and Licensing Board will issue a notice of hearing or an 
    appropriate order. In the event that no request for hearing or petition 
    for leave to intervene is filed by the above date, the NRC may, upon 
    satisfactory completion of all required evaluations, issue the 
    materials license without further prior notice.
        A petition for leave to intervene shall set forth with 
    particularity the interest of the petitioner in the proceeding and how 
    that interest may be affected by the results of the proceeding. The 
    petition should specifically explain the reasons why intervention 
    should be permitted with particular reference to the following factors: 
    (1) The nature of the petitoner's right under the Act to be made a 
    party to the proceeding; (2) the nature and extent of the petitioner's 
    property, financial, or other interest in the proceeding; and (3) the 
    possible effect of any order that may be entered in the proceeding on 
    the petitioner's interest. The petition should also identify the 
    specific aspect(s) of the subject of the proceeding as to which 
    petitioner wishes to intervene. Any person who has filed a petition for 
    leave to intervene or who has been admitted as a party may amend a 
    petition, without requesting leave of the Board up to 15 days prior to 
    the holding of the first prehearing conference scheduled in the 
    proceeding, but such an amended petition must satisfy the specificity 
    requirements described above.
        Not later than fifteen (15) days prior to the first prehearing 
    conference scheduled in the proceeding, a petitioner shall file a 
    supplement to the petition to intervene which must include a list of 
    contentions which are sought to be litigated in the matter. Each 
    contention must consist of a specific statement of the issue of law or 
    fact to be raised or controverted. In addition, the petitioner shall 
    provide a brief explanation of the bases of the contention and a 
    concise statement of the alleged facts or expert opinion which support 
    the contention and on which the petitioner intends to rely in proving 
    the contention at the hearing. The petitioner must also provide 
    references to those specific sources and documents of which the 
    petitioner is aware and on which the petitioner is aware and on which 
    the petitioner intends to rely to establish those facts or expert 
    opinion. Petitioner must provide sufficient information to show that a 
    genuine dispute exists with the applicant on a material issue of law or 
    fact. Contentions shall be limited to matters within the scope of the 
    action under consideration. The contention must be one which, if 
    proven, would entitle the petitioner to relief. A petitioner who fails 
    to file such a supplement which satisfied these requirements with 
    respect to at least one contention will not be permitted to participate 
    as a party.
        Those permitted to intervene become parties to the proceeding, 
    subject to any limitations in the order granting leave to intervene, 
    and have the opportunity to participate fully in the conduct of the 
    hearing.
        A request for a hearing or a petition for leave to intervene must 
    be filed with the Secretary of the Commission, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory 
    Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555, Attention: Docketing and Service 
    Branch, or may be delivered to the Commission's Public Document Room, 
    the Gelman Building, 2120 L Street, NW., Washington, D.C., by the above 
    date. Where petitioners are filed during the last ten (10) days of the 
    notice period, it is requested that the petitioner promptly so inform 
    the NRC by a toll-free telephone call to Western Union at 1-(800) 248-
    5100 (in Missouri 1-(800) 342-6700). The Western Union operator should 
    be given Datagram Identification Number N1023 and the following message 
    addressed to William D. Travers, Director, Spent Fuel Project Office, 
    Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards: Petitioner's name and 
    telephone number; date petition was mailed; plant name; and publication 
    date and page number of this Federal Register notice. A copy of the 
    petition should also be sent to the Office of the General Counsel, U.S. 
    Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555, and to Michael 
    W. Maupin, Esq., Hunton and Williams, Riverfront Plaza, East Tower, 951 
    E. Byrd Street, Richmond, Virginia, 23219, General Counsel for the 
    applicant.
        Nontimely filings of petitions for leave to intervene, amended 
    petitions, supplemental petitions and/or requests for hearing will not 
    be entertained absent a determination by the Commission, the presiding 
    officer or the presiding Atomic Safety and Licensing Board that the 
    petition and/or request should be granted based upon a balancing of the 
    factors specified in 10 CFR 2.714(a)(1)(i)-(v) and 2.714(d).
        The Commission hereby provides notice that this proceeding concerns 
    an application for a license falling within the scope of section 134 of 
    the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982 (NWPA), 42 U.S.C. 10154. Under 
    section 134 of NWPA, the NRC, at the request of any petitioner or any 
    party to the proceeding, must use hybrid hearing procedures with 
    respect to ``any matter which the Commission determines to be in 
    controversy among the parties.'' The hybrid procedures in section 134 
    provide for oral argument on matters in controversy, preceded by 
    discovery under the Commission's rules, and the designation, following 
    argument, of only those factual issues that involve a genuine and 
    substantial dispute, together with any remaining questions of law, to 
    be resolved in an adjudicatory hearing. Actual adjudicatory hearings 
    are to be held on only those issues 
    
    [[Page 35239]]
    found to meet the criteria of section 134 and set for hearing after 
    oral argument.
        The Commission's rule implementing section 134 of the NWPA are 
    found in 10 CFR Part 2, subpart K, ``Hybrid Hearing Procedures for 
    Expansion of Spent Nuclear Fuel Storage Capacity at Civilian Nuclear 
    Power Reactors,'' (published at 50 FR 41662, October 15, 1985). Under 
    those rules, any party to the proceeding may invoke the hybrid hearing 
    procedures by filing with the presiding officer a written request for 
    oral argument under 10 CFR 2.1109. To be timely, the request must be 
    filed within ten (10) days of an order granting a request for hearing 
    or petition to intervene. (As outlined above, the Commission's rules in 
    10 CFR Part 2, subpart G continue to govern the filing of requests for 
    a hearing or petitions to intervene, as well as the admission of 
    contentions.) The presiding officer may grant an untimely request for 
    oral argument only upon a showing of good cause by the requesting party 
    for the failure to file on time and after providing the other parties 
    an opportunity to respond to the untimely request. If the presiding 
    officer grants a request for oral argument, any hearing held on the 
    application shall be conducted in accordance with the hybrid hearing 
    procedures. In essence, those procedures limit the time available for 
    discovery and require that an oral argument to held to determine 
    whether any contentions must be resolved in an adjudicatory hearing. If 
    no party to the proceeding requests oral argument, or if all untimely 
    requests for oral argument are denied, then the usual procedures in 10 
    CFR Part 2, subpart G apply.
        For further details with respect to this action, see the 
    application dated May 9, 1995, which is available for public inspection 
    at the Commission's Public Document Room, 2120 L Street, NW., 
    Washington, D.C. 20555, and at the local public document room at the 
    Special Collections Department, Second Floor Alderman Library, 
    University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia 22903-2498. The 
    Commission's licenses and Safety Evaluation Report, when issued, may be 
    inspected at the above locations.
    
        Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 28th day of June, 1995.
    
        For the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
    William D. Travers, Director,
    Spend Fuel Project Office, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and 
    Safeguards.
    [FR Doc. 95-16524 Filed 7-5-95; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 7590-01-M
    
    

Document Information

Published:
07/06/1995
Department:
Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
95-16524
Pages:
35237-35239 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket Nos. 72-16, 50-338/339
PDF File:
95-16524.pdf