98-17774. Westinghouse Electric Corporation (CBS Corporation) Westinghouse Test Reactor; Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact  

  • [Federal Register Volume 63, Number 128 (Monday, July 6, 1998)]
    [Notices]
    [Page 36453]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 98-17774]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
    
    [Docket No. 50-22]
    
    
    Westinghouse Electric Corporation (CBS Corporation) Westinghouse 
    Test Reactor; Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant 
    Impact
    
        The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) is 
    considering issuance of an amendment to Facility License No. TR-2, now 
    held by the CBS Corporation, formerly named the Westinghouse Electric 
    Corporation. The license authorizes possession only of the Westinghouse 
    Test Reactor (WTR), located in Westmoreland County, Pennsylvania.
    
    Environmental Assessment
    
    Identification of the Proposed Action
    
        The proposed action would amend Facility License No. TR-2 for the 
    WTR to reflect the change in the legal name of the licensee from 
    Westinghouse Electric Corporation to CBS Corporation, which occurred on 
    December 1, 1997.
        The proposed action is in accordance with the licensee's 
    application for amendment dated December 22, 1997, as supplemented on 
    June 15, 1998.
    
    Need for the Proposed Action
    
        The proposed action is needed to accurately reflect the legal name 
    of the licensee.
    
    Environmental Impacts of the Proposed Action
    
        The proposed action does not modify the WTR facility configuration, 
    procedures or requirements, or affect licensed activities. The 
    employees responsible for the licensed WTR facility will still be 
    responsible notwithstanding the new name of the licensee. The proposed 
    action will not affect the financial qualifications of the licensee to 
    possess and decommission the facility.
        In light of the foregoing, the Commission concludes that the change 
    will not increase the probability or consequences of accidents, no 
    changes are being made in the types of any effluents that may be 
    released offsite, and there will be no significant increase in the 
    allowable individual or cumulative occupational radiation exposure. 
    Accordingly the Commission concludes that there are no significant 
    radiological environmental impacts associated with the proposed action.
        With regard to potential nonradiological impacts, the proposed 
    action is administrative in nature and does not involve any physical 
    features of the plant. Thus, it does not affect nonradiological plant 
    effluents and has no other environmental impact. Accordingly, the 
    Commission concludes that there are no significant nonradiological 
    environmental impacts associated with the proposed action.
    
    Alternatives to the Proposed Action
    
        Since the Commission has concluded there is no measurable 
    environmental impact associated with the proposed action, any 
    alternatives with equal or greater environmental impact need not be 
    evaluated. As an alternative to the proposed action, the staff 
    considered denial of the proposed action. Denial of the application 
    would result in no change in current environmental impacts. The 
    environmental impacts of the proposed action and the alternative action 
    are similar.
    
    Alternative Use of Resources
    
        No alternatives appear that will have different or lesser effect on 
    the use of available resources.
    
    Agencies and Persons Contacted
    
        In accordance with its stated policy, on June 23, 1998, the NRC 
    staff consulted with the Pennsylvania State Official, Ray Woods, of the 
    Bureau of Radiation Protection, Pennsylvania Department of 
    Environmental Protection, regarding the environmental impact of the 
    proposed action. The State official had no comments.
    
    Finding of No Significant Impact
    
        Based upon the environmental assessment, the Commission concludes 
    that the proposed action will not have a significant effect on the 
    quality of the human environment. Accordingly, the Commission has 
    determined not to prepare an environmental impact statement for the 
    proposed action.
        For further details with respect to the proposed action, see the 
    licensee's submittals dated December 22, 1997 and June 15, 1998, which 
    are available for public inspection at the Commission's Public Document 
    Room, the Gelman Building, 2120 L Street, NW., Washington DC.
    
        Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 26th day of June 1998.
    
        For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
    Seymour H. Weiss,
    Director, Non-Power Reactors and Decommissioning Project Directorate, 
    Division of Reactor Project Management, Office of Nuclear Reactor 
    Regulation.
    [FR Doc. 98-17774 Filed 7-2-98; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
07/06/1998
Department:
Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
98-17774
Pages:
36453-36453 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 50-22
PDF File:
98-17774.pdf