99-17018. Documents Containing Reporting or Recordkeeping Requirements: Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Review  

  • [Federal Register Volume 64, Number 128 (Tuesday, July 6, 1999)]
    [Notices]
    [Page 36407]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 99-17018]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
    
    
    Documents Containing Reporting or Recordkeeping Requirements: 
    Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Review
    
    AGENCY: U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC).
    
    ACTION: Notice of the OMB review of information collection and 
    solicitation of public comment.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The NRC has recently submitted to OMB for review the following 
    proposal for the collection of information under the provisions of the 
    Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).
        1. Type of submission, new, revision, or extension: Revision.
        2. The title of the information collection: Changes, Tests and 
    Experiments, and Updating of Final Safety Analysis Reports (10 CFR 
    Parts 50 and 72).
        3. The form number if applicable: Not applicable.
        4. How often the collection is required: Information is required to 
    be collected when changes, tests or experiments are made by the 
    licensee; reporting of these changes is required every two years. 
    Updating the final safety analysis report (FSAR) is required every two 
    years for independent spent fuel storage installations (ISFSIs) and for 
    power reactor facilities.
        5. Who will be required or asked to report: Reports are submitted 
    by licensees of production or utilization facilities licensed under 10 
    CFR Part 50 and by licensees and certificate holders for ISFSIs and 
    spent fuel storage casks, pursuant to 10 CFR Part 72.
        6. An estimate of the number of responses: The annual number of 
    responses is estimated as 112 reports.
        7. The estimated number of annual respondents: The total number of 
    respondents under Part 50 is 175 reactor licensees. In addition, there 
    are 18 respondents subject to Part 72. Since the reporting for these 
    respondents is on a two-year cycle, the annual number of respondents is 
    112.
        8. An estimate of the total number of hours needed annually to 
    complete the requirement or request: The total number of hours annually 
    is estimated at 377,160 hours (an increase of 37,300 hours)--54,770 
    hours (a decrease of 180 hours) for reporting; 269,316 hours (a 
    decrease of 15,594 hours) for recordkeeping. This total estimate also 
    includes an annualized one-time burden of 53,069 hours for 
    implementation of the revisions to the rule through procedures and 
    training of personnel. The hours needed depend upon the number and 
    complexity of changes that a licensee chooses to make. The hours needed 
    for a power reactor respondent are estimated to be significantly 
    greater than those for a spent fuel storage cask certificate holder or 
    ISFSI licensee.
        9. An indication of whether Section 3507(d), Pub. L. 104-13 
    applies: Applicable.
        10. Abstract: The NRC is revising requirements pertaining to 
    changes, tests, and experiments, and for updating of final safety 
    analysis reports. The purpose of the rulemaking is to clarify 
    requirements and to allow more flexibility for certain changes that a 
    licensee can make without receiving prior NRC approval.
        Submit, by August 5, 1999, comments that address the following 
    questions:
        1. Is the proposed collection of information necessary for the NRC 
    to properly perform its functions? Does the information have practical 
    utility?
        2. Is the burden estimate accurate?
        3. Is there a way to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of 
    the information to be collected?
        4. How can the burden of the information collection be minimized, 
    including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of 
    information technology?
        A copy of the supporting statement may be viewed free of charge at 
    the NRC Public Document Room, 2120 L Street, NW (lower level), 
    Washington, DC. OMB clearance packages are available at the NRC 
    worldwide web site (http://www.nrc.gov/NRC/PUBLIC/OMB/index.html). The 
    document will be available on the NRC home page site for 60 days after 
    the signature date of this notice.
        Comments and questions should be directed to the OMB reviewer by 
    August 5, 1999: Erik Godwin, Office of Information and Regulatory 
    Affairs (3150-0011 and 3150-0132), NEOB-10202, Office of Management and 
    Budget, Washington, DC 20503.
        Comments can also be submitted by telephone at (202) 395-3087.
        The NRC Clearance Officer is Brenda Jo. Shelton, 301-415-7233.
    
        For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
    
        Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 25th day of May, 1999.
    Brenda Jo. Shelton,
    NRC Clearance Officer, Office of the Chief Information Officer.
    [FR Doc. 99-17018 Filed 7-2-99; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
07/06/1999
Department:
Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Notice of the OMB review of information collection and solicitation of public comment.
Document Number:
99-17018
Pages:
36407-36407 (1 pages)
PDF File:
99-17018.pdf