96-17297. Notice of Application for Approval of Discontinuance or Modification of a Railroad Signal System or Relief From the Requirements of 49 CFR Part 236  

  • [Federal Register Volume 61, Number 131 (Monday, July 8, 1996)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 35859-35860]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 96-17297]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    
    Notice of Application for Approval of Discontinuance or 
    Modification of a Railroad Signal System or Relief From the 
    Requirements of 49 CFR Part 236
    
        Pursuant to 49 CFR Part 235 and 49 U.S.C. App. 26, the following 
    railroads have petitioned the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) 
    seeking approval for the discontinuance or modification of the signal 
    system or relief from the requirements of 49 CFR Part 236 as detailed 
    below.
    
    Block Signal Application (BS-AP)-No. 3402
    
    Applicant: Burlington Northern Railroad Company
    
    Mr. William G. Peterson,
    Director Signal Engineering,
    1900 Continental Plaza,
    777 Main Street,
    Fort Worth, Texas 76102-5384.
    
        The Burlington Northern Railroad Company seeks approval of the 
    proposed discontinuance and removal of the traffic control system 
    (TCS), associated with the installation of an automatic block signal 
    (ABS) system with track warrant control, on the single main track 
    between Appleton, Minnesota, milepost 578 and Hettinger, South Dakota, 
    milepost 925.9, on the Willmar and Yellowstone Divisions, Appleton, 
    Mobridge, and Hettinger Subdivision, a distance of approximately 348 
    miles. The proposed changes include: conversion of ``Big Stone Power 
    Plant'' and ``West Aberdeen'' Control Points to remote-controlled 
    interlockings, replacement of all power-operated and spring switches 
    with circuit controller monitored hand-operated switches, removal of 
    all switch electric locks, and modification of signal placement and 
    spacing.
        The reasons given for the proposed changes are that reduced traffic 
    patterns do not justify the high cost to maintain an aging TCS, and 
    this application will retain the safety of train operations provided by 
    an ABS system while providing economic relief from having to maintain 
    the additional plant associated with TCS.
    
    BS-AP-No. 3403
    
    Applicant: Burlington Northern Railroad Company
    
    Mr. William G. Peterson,
    Director Signal Engineering,
    1900 Continental Plaza,
    777 Main Street,
    Fort Worth, Texas 76102-5384.
    
        The Burlington Northern Railroad Company seeks approval of the 
    proposed reduction to the limits of the automatic block signal system, 
    on the single main track, between ``P.A. Tower'', milepost 109.9 and 
    Grand Forks, milepost 107.6, North Dakota, Fargo Division, Grand Forks 
    Subdivision; consisting of the discontinuance and removal of automatic 
    block signals 107.9, 107.8, 108.3. 108.4, and 109.2, and conversion of 
    automatic block signal 109.3 to a distant approach signal.
        The reasons given for the proposed changes are the reduction in 
    train movements over the trackage and to provide a more efficient 
    operation.
    
    Rules Standards & Instructions Application (RS&I-AP)-No. 1101
    
    Applicant: Florida East Coast Railway Company
    
    Mr. Charles R. Lynch,
    Vice President-Maintenance,
    One Malaga Street,
    P.O. Box 1048,
    St. Augustine, Florida 32085-1048.
    
        The Florida East Coast Railway Company (FEC) seeks temporary relief 
    from the requirements of 49 CFR, Part 236, Section 236.566 of the 
    Rules, Standard and Instructions, for a 30 day period, to the extent 
    that FEC be permitted to operate non-operational automatic train 
    control (ATC) equipped locomotives, over FEC's entire ATC territory by 
    way-side signal indications of the traffic control system, to 
    accommodate modifications to both the onboard and roadway ATC 
    equipment.
        Applicant's justification for relief: To implement changes to the 
    ATC system code rates in order to enhance and improve the reliability 
    of the system, associated with the designed elimination of cab signal 
    flips.
        Any interested party desiring to protest the granting of an 
    application shall set forth specifically the grounds upon which the 
    protest is made, and contain a concise statement of the interest of the 
    protestant in the proceeding. The original and two copies of the 
    protest shall be filed with the Associate Administrator for Safety, 
    FRA, 400 Seventh Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20590 within 45 
    calendar days of the date of issuance of this notice. Additionally, one 
    copy of the protest shall be furnished to the applicant at the address 
    listed above.
        FRA expects to be able to determine these matters without oral 
    hearing. However, if a specific request for an oral hearing is 
    accompanied by a showing that the party is unable to adequately present 
    his or her position by written statements, an application may be set 
    for public hearing.
    
    
    [[Page 35860]]
    
    
        Issued in Washington, DC, on July 1, 1996.
    Phil Olekszyk,
    Deputy Associate Administrator for Safety Compliance and Program 
    Implementation.
    [FR Doc. 96-17297 Filed 7-5-96; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-06-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
07/08/1996
Department:
Transportation Department
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
96-17297
Pages:
35859-35860 (2 pages)
PDF File:
96-17297.pdf