[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 131 (Monday, July 8, 1996)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 35703-35705]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-17302]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 167
[CGD 96-030]
Port Access Routes; Approaches to the Cape Fear River and
Beaufort Inlet, North Carolina
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DOT.
ACTION: Notice of study.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is conducting a port access route study to
evaluate the need for vessel routing or other traffic management
measures in the approaches to the Cape Fear River and Beaufort Inlet,
NC. Concerns for the
[[Page 35704]]
safety of navigation in these areas have been expressed by the Morehead
City Pilots Association and the Coast Guard Marine Safety Office in
Wilmington, NC. This port access route study will determine what, if
any, vessel routing or other traffic management measures are needed in
the approaches to the Cape Fear River and Beaufort Inlet, NC. As a
result of the study, vessel routing measures or other vessel operating
requirements may be proposed in the Federal Register.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before October 7, 1996.
ADDRESSES: Comments should be mailed to Commander (Aow), Fifth Coast
Guard District, 431 Crawford Street, Portsmouth, VA 23704-5004. The
comments and other materials referenced in this notice will be
available for inspection and copying at 431 Crawford Street,
Portsmouth, VA, room 401. Normal office hours are 8 a.m. to 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except holidays. Comments may also be hand
delivered to this address.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
LT Edward Westfall (757) 398-6559 or E.Westfall/LANT5@cgsmtp.uscg.mil
(Internet), or Margie Hegy (202) 267-0415 or M.Hegy/G-
M11@cgsmtp.uscg.mil (Internet).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Request for Comments
The Coast Guard is interested in receiving information and opinions
from persons who have an interest in safe routing of ships in the study
area. Vessel owners and operators are specifically invited to comment
on any safety concerns they may have when operating in the study area.
Negative impacts that may result from the establishment of a routing
measure, such as a traffic separation scheme (TSS), or a regulated
navigation area (RNA) with vessel operating requirements should be
identified and supported with documentation of any costs or benefits.
Commenters should include their names and addresses, identify this
notice (CGD 96-030), and give reasons for each comment. Receipt of
comments will be acknowledged if a stamped, self-addressed post card or
envelope is enclosed. In addition to the specific questions asked
herein, comments from the maritime community, offshore development
concerns, environmental groups and any other interested parties are
invited. All comments received during the comment period will be
considered in the study and in development of any regulatory proposals.
The Fifth Coast Guard District will conduct the study and develop
recommendations. LT Edward Westfall, Waterways Management Section, Aids
to Navigation and Waterways Management Branch, Fifth Coast Guard
District (757) 398-6559, is the project officer responsible for the
study.
Background and Purpose
The 1978 amendments to the Ports and Waterways Safety Act (PWSA),
33 U.S.C. 1223(c), require that a port access route study be conducted
prior to establishing or adjusting fairways or TSS's. The Coast Guard
is undertaking a port access route study to determine if a vessel
routing system is needed in the study area.
An internationally recognized vessel routing system is one or more
routes or routing measures aimed at reducing the risk of casualties. A
system may include TSS's, two-way routes, recommended tracks, areas to
be avoided, inshore traffic zones, roundabouts, precautionary areas,
and deep-water routes.
A TSS is a routing measure which minimizes the risk of collision by
separating vessels into opposing streams of traffic through the
establishment of traffic lanes. Vessel use of a TSS is voluntary;
however, vessels operating in or near an International Maritime
Organization (IMO) approved TSS are subject to Rule 10 of the
International Regulations for Prevention of Collisions at Sea, 1972 (72
COLREGS).
A two-way route is a route within defined limits inside which two-
way traffic is established, aimed at providing safe passage of ships
through waters where navigation is difficult or dangerous.
A recommended track is a route which has been specially examined to
ensure so far as possible that it is free of dangers and along which
ships are advised to navigate.
An area to be avoided is a routing measure comprising an area
within defined limits in which either navigation is particularly
hazardous or it is exceptionally important to avoid casualties and
which should be avoided by all ships, or certain classes of ships.
An inshore traffic zone comprises a designated area between the
landward boundary of a TSS and the adjacent coast and is used in
accordance with Rule 10(d) of the 72 COLREGS.
A roundabout is a routing measure comprising a separation point or
circular separation zone and a circular traffic lane within defined
limits. Traffic within the roundabout is separated by moving in a
counterclockwise direction around the separation point or zone.
A precautionary area is a defined area where ships must navigate
with particular caution and within which the direction of traffic flow
may be recommended.
A deep-water route is a route within defined limits which has been
accurately surveyed for clearance of sea bottom and submerged obstacles
as indicated on nautical charts.
The approaches to the Cape Fear River and Beaufort Inlet, NC were
last studied in 1981, and the final results were published on July 22,
1982 (47 FR 31766). The study concluded that ``there is no need to
impose new ship routing measures such as TSS's or shipping safety
fairways where fixed structures would be prohibited, in any'' area off
the North Carolina coast. Vessel traffic density and channel depth and
width have changed since 1981.
The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' Waterborne Commerce of The United
States reports that, from 1981 to 1993, annual trips to and from the
Port of Wilmington, NC increased by 128% (from 10,060 to 22,897) and
the number of trips to and from Morehead City Harbor, NC decreased by
57% (from 7,842 to 3,385). Since 1981, the actual controlling depth for
the Cape Fear River ocean bar channel has increased from 38 feet to 40
feet, the project depth. The project depth for Beaufort Inlet/Morehead
City has recently been increased from 42 to 45 feet.
The Morehead City Pilots Association requested additional aids to
navigation in the approach routes commonly used for Beaufort Inlet
because a dredge spoil area has shallowed the area. They also report
difficulty in distinguishing the range lights on Beaufort Inlet Reach
because of background lights from the town of Beaufort; and, the light
at the entrance to Gallants Channel is easily confused with the lights
marking the Morhead City Channel and could be the cause of an accident.
Because of safety concerns associated with the close proximity of
shipping lanes to shallow water, the Coast Guard's Marine Safety Office
in Wilmington, NC suggested that establishing anchorages and a vessel
routing scheme, to include pilot transfer zones, may assist safe
navigation in the study area.
Study Area
The study area is bounded by a line connecting the following
geographic positions:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Latitude Longitude
------------------------------------------------------------------------
34 deg.40'N 77 deg.00'W
34 deg.40'N 76 deg.15'W
34 deg.10'N 76 deg.15''W
[[Page 35705]]
33 deg.15'N 77 deg.30'W
33 deg.00'N 78 deg.20'W
33 deg.50'N 78 deg.20'W
33 deg.50'N 77 deg.55'W
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The study area encompasses the approaches to the Cape Fear River
and Beaufort Inlet, as well as the area offshore of North Carolina used
by commercial vessels transiting to and between these ports.
Issues
The Coast Guard is trying to determine the scope of any safety
problems associated with vessel transit in the study area. It is
expected that information will be gathered during the study that will
identify the problems and appropriate solutions.
The study may recommend the following:
1. No vessel routing measures are needed.
2. Establish one or more of the following vessel routing measures:
(a) TSS in the Approach to Cape Fear River;
(b) TSS in the Approach to Beaufort Inlet;
(c) TSS Off North Carolina encompassing the routes typically used
by merchant and naval vessels transiting the study area;
(d) Precautionary area(s) near either or both approaches;
(e) Inshore traffic zone(s) near either or both approaches; and,
(f) Establish an area to be avoided in shallow areas where the risk
of grounding is present.
3. Create anchorage area(s).
4. Establish a regulated navigation area with specific vessel
operating requirements to ensure safe navigation in areas near shallow
water.
Procedural Requirements
In order to provide safe access routes for movement of vessel
traffic proceeding to and from U.S. ports, the PWSA directs that the
Secretary designate necessary fairways and TSS's in which the paramount
right of navigation over all other uses shall be recognized. Before a
designation can be made, the Coast Guard is required to undertake a
study of potential traffic density and the need for safe access routes.
During the study, the Coast Guard is directed to consult with
federal and state agencies and to consider the views of representatives
of the maritime community, port and harbor authorities or associations,
environmental groups, and other parties who may be affected by the
proposed action.
In accordance with 33 U.S.C. 1223(c), the Coast Guard will, to the
extent practicable, reconcile the need for safe access routes with the
needs of all other reasonable uses of the area involved. The Coast
Guard will also consider previous studies and experience in the areas
of vessel traffic management, navigation, shiphandling, the effects of
weather, and prior analysis of the traffic density in certain regions.
The results of this study will be published in the Federal
Register. If the Coast Guard determines that new routing or other
regulatory measures are needed, a notice of proposed rulemaking will be
published. It is anticipated that the study will be concluded by 31
December 1996.
Dated: June 28, 1996.
J.C. Card,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Chief, Marine Safety and Environmental
Protection.
[FR Doc. 96-17302 Filed 7-5-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-14-M
