98-18053. Joint Industry Plan; Solicitation of Comments and Order Approving Request to Extend Temporary Effectiveness of Reporting Plan for Nasdaq/ National Market Securities Traded on an Exchange on an Unlisted or Listed Basis, Submitted by the ...  

  • [Federal Register Volume 63, Number 130 (Wednesday, July 8, 1998)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 36979-36981]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 98-18053]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
    
    [Release No. 34-40151; File No. S7-24-89]
    
    
    Joint Industry Plan; Solicitation of Comments and Order Approving 
    Request to Extend Temporary Effectiveness of Reporting Plan for Nasdaq/
    National Market Securities Traded on an Exchange on an Unlisted or 
    Listed Basis, Submitted by the National Association of Securities 
    Dealers, Inc., the Boston Stock Exchange, Inc., the Chicago Stock 
    Exchange, Inc., and the Philadelphia Stock Exchange, Inc.
    
    July 1, 1998.
    
    I. Introduction
    
        On June 30, 1998, the National Association of Securities Dealers, 
    Inc. (``NASD''), on behalf of itself and the Boston Stock Exchange, 
    Inc. (``BSE''), the Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc. (``CHX''), and the 
    Philadelphia Stock Exchange, Inc. (``Phlx'') submitted to the 
    Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'' or ``SEC'') a 
    proposal to extend the operation of a joint transaction reporting plan 
    (``Plan'') \1\ for Nasdaq/National Market (``Nasdaq/NM'') (previously 
    referred to as Nasdaq/NMS) securities traded on an exchange on an 
    unlisted or listed basis.\2\ The proposal would extend the 
    effectiveness of the Plan, as amended by Revised Amendment No. 9, as 
    defined in footnote 3, through December 31, 1998.\3\ The Commission 
    also is extending certain exemptive relief as described below. The June 
    1998 Extension Request also requests that the Commission approve the 
    Plan, as amended, on a permanent basis on or before December 31, 1998. 
    During the six-month extension of the Plan, the Commission will 
    consider whether to approve the proposed Plan, as amended, on a 
    permanent basis.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \1\ See Letter from Robert E. Aber, Vice President and General 
    Counsel, Nasdaq, to Jonathan G. Katz, Secretary, Commission, dated 
    June 30, 1998 (``June 1998 Extension Request''). The June 1998 
    Extension Request also requests the Commission continue to provide 
    exemptive relief, previously granted in connection with the Plan on 
    a temporary basis, from Rules 11Ac1-2 and 11Aa3-1 under the 
    Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''). 15 U.S.C. 78a 
    et seq. The signatories to the Plan are the Participants for 
    purposes of this release, however, the BSE joined the Plan as a 
    ``limited participant'' and reports quotation information and 
    transaction reports only in Nasdaq/NM securities listed on the BSE. 
    Originally, the American Stock Exchange, Inc. (``Amex'') was a 
    Participant but withdrew its participation from the Plan in August 
    1994.
        \2\ Section 12 of the Act generally requires an exchange to 
    trade only those securities that the exchange lists, except that 
    Section 12(f) of the Act permits unlisted trading privileges 
    (``UTP'') under certain circumstances. For example, Section 12(f), 
    among other things, permits exchanges to trade certain securities 
    that are traded over-the-counter (``OTC/UTP''), but only pursuant to 
    a Commission order or rule. The present order fulfills this Section 
    12(f) requirement. For a more complete discussion of the Section 
    12(f) requirement, see November 1995 Extension Order, infra note 8.
        \3\ On March 18, 1996, the Commission solicited comment on a 
    revenue sharing agreement among the Participants. See March 1996 
    Extension Order, infra note 8. Thereafter the Participants submitted 
    certain technical revisions to the revenue sharing agreement 
    (`'Revised Amendment No. 9''). See Letter from Robert E. Aber, Vice 
    President and General Counsel, Nasdaq, to Jonathan G. Katz, 
    Secretary, Commission, dated September 13, 1996. See also September 
    1996 Extension Order, infra note 8.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    II. Background
    
        The Plan governs the collection, consolidation and dissemination of 
    quotation and transaction information for Nasdaq/NM securities listed 
    on an exchange or traded on an exchange pursuant to a grant of UTP.\4\ 
    The Commission approved trading pursuant to the Plan on a one-year 
    pilot basis, with the pilot period to commence when transaction 
    reporting pursuant to the Plan commenced. The Commission originally 
    approved the Plan on June 26, 1990.\5\ Accordingly, the pilot period 
    commenced on July 12, 1993 and was scheduled to expire on July 12, 
    1994.\6\ The Plan has since been in operation on an extended pilot 
    basis.\7\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \4\ See Section 12(f)(2) of the Act.
        \5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 28146 (June 26, 
    1990), 55 FR 27917 (July 6, 1990) (``1990 Plan Approval Order'').
        \6\ See letter from David T. Rusoff, Foley & Lardner, to Betsy 
    Prout, Division of Market Regulation (``Division''), SEC, dated May 
    9, 1994.
        \7\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 34371 (July 13, 
    1994), 59 FR 37103 (July 20, 1994); Securities Exchange Act Release 
    No. 35221 (January 11, 1995), 60 FR 3886 (January 19, 1995); 
    Securities Exchange Act Release No. 36102 (August 14, 1995), 60 FR 
    43626 (August 22, 1995); Securities Exchange Act Release No. 36226 
    (September 13, 1995), 60 FR 49029 (September 21, 1995); Securities 
    Exchange Act Release No. 36368 (October 13, 1995), 60 FR 54091 
    (October 19, 1995); Securities Exchange Act Release No. 36481 
    (November 13, 1995), 60 FR 58119 (November 24, 1995) (``November 
    1995 Extension Order''); Securities Exchange Act Release No. 36589 
    (December 13, 1995), 60 FR 65696 (December 20); Securities Exchange 
    Act Release No. 36650 (December 28, 1995), 61 FR 358 (January 4, 
    1996); Securities Exchange Act Release No. 36934 (March 6, 1996), 61 
    FR 10408 (March 13, 1996); Securities Exchange Act Release No. 36985 
    (March 18, 1996), 61 FR 12122 (March 25, 1996) (``March 1996 
    Extension Order''); Securities Exchange Act Release No. 37689 
    (September 16, 1996), 61 FR 50058 (September 24, 1996) (``September 
    1996 Extension Order''); Securities Exchange Act Release No. 37772 
    (October 1, 1996), 61 FR 52980 (October 9, 1996); Securities 
    Exchange Act Release No. 38457 (March 31, 1997), 62 FR 16880 (April 
    8, 1997); Securities Exchange Act Release No. 38794 (June 30, 1997) 
    62 FR 36586 (July 8, 1997) (``June 1997 Extension Order''); and 
    Securities Exchange Act Release No. 39505 (December 31, 1997) 63 FR 
    1515 (``December 1997 Extension Order'').
    
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    [[Page 36980]]
    
    III. Description of the Plan
    
        The Plan provides for the collection from Plan Participants and the 
    consolidation and dissemination to vendors, subscribers and others of 
    quotation and transaction information in ``eligible securities.'' \8\ 
    The Plan contains various provisions concerning its operation, 
    including: Implementation of the Plan; Manner of Collecting, 
    Processing, Sequencing, Making Available and Disseminating Last Sale 
    Information; Reporting Requirements (including hours of operation); 
    Standards and Methods of Ensuring Promptness, Accuracy and Completeness 
    of Transaction Reports; Terms and Conditions Access; Description of 
    Operation of Facility Contemplated by the Plan; Method and Frequency of 
    Processor Evaluation; Written Understandings of Agreements Relating to 
    Interpretation of, or Participation in, the Plan; Calculation of the 
    Best Bid and Offer (``BBO''); Dispute Resolution; and Method of 
    Determination and Imposition, and Amount of Fees and Charges.\9\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \8\ The Plan defines ``eligible security'' as any Nasdaq/NM 
    security as to which unlisted trading privileges have been granted 
    to a national securities exchange pursuant to Section 12(f) of the 
    Act or that is listed on a national securities exchange.
        \9\ The full text of the Plan, as well as a ``Concept Paper'' 
    describing the requirements of the Plan, are contained in the 
    original filing which is available for inspection and copying in the 
    Commission's public reference room.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    IV. Exemptive Relief
    
        In conjunction with the Plan, on a temporary basis scheduled to 
    expire on June 30, 1998, the Commission granted an exemption to vendors 
    from Rule 11Ac1-2 under the Act regarding the calculation of the BBO 
    \10\ and granted the BSE an exemption from the provision of Rule 11Aa3-
    1 under the Act that requires transaction reporting plans to include 
    market identifiers for transaction reports and last sale data. As 
    discussed further below in the Summary of Comments, the Participants 
    ask in the June 1998 Extension Request that the Commission grant an 
    extension of the exemptive relief described above to vendors until the 
    BBO calculation issue is resolved. Additionally, in the June 1998 
    Extension Request, the Participants also request that the Commission 
    grant an extension of the exemptive relief described above to the BSE 
    for as long as the BSE is a Limited Participant under the Plan.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \10\ Rule 11Ac1-2 under the Act requires that the best bid or 
    best offer be computed on a price/size/time algorithm in certain 
    circumstances. Specifically, Rule 11Ac1-2 under the Act provides 
    that ``in the event two or more reporting market centers make 
    available identical bids or offers for a reported security, the best 
    bid or offer . . . shall be computed by ranking all such identical 
    bids or offers . . . first by size . . . then by time.'' The 
    exemption permits vendors to display the BBO for Nasdaq securities 
    subject to the Plan on a price/time/size basis.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    V. Summary of Comments
    
        In the December 1997 Extension Order, the Commission requested 
    comment on the following issues: Whether the BBO calculation for 
    securities traded pursuant to the Plan should be based on a price/time/
    size methodology or a price/size/time methodology; whether there is a 
    need for a trade through rule, and the impact of the CHX's intended use 
    of BRASS, as defined below.
        With respect to the BBO calculation issue, the Nasdaq Board 
    approved a recommendation to modify the methodology for calculating the 
    BBO on Nasdaq in order to prioritize quotes based on a price/size/time 
    algorithm instead of the current price/time/size algorithm, provided 
    that Nasdaq market makers are subject to a minimum quote size 
    requirement of 100 shares for at least 1,000 Nasdaq securities. In 
    furtherance of this goal, on October 29, 1997, the Commission approved 
    a NASD proposal to extend and expand the ``Actual Size Rule'' \11\ to a 
    total of 150 securities from 100 securities.\12\ More recently, the 
    NASD proposed to expand the Actual Size Rule to cover all Nasdaq 
    securities and to implement this rule on a permanent basis.\13\ In 
    addition, the NASD submitted a proposed rule change to establish an 
    integrated order delivery and execution system for directed orders and 
    non-directed orders.\14\ The proposed new system, if approved would 
    replace the NASD's SOES and SelectNet systems and would have an impact 
    on the Plan (e.g., the manner in which Plan participants interact with 
    orders and quotes displayed in Nasdaq).\15\ As a result, the NASD and 
    the Plan participants request an extension of the Plan until December 
    31, 1998 to afford the Plan participants time to resolve the BBO 
    issue.\16\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \11\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 39285 (October 29, 
    1997), 62 FR 59932 (November 5, 1997).
        \12\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 38513 (April 15, 
    1997), 62 FR 19369 (April 21, 1997). Under the Actual Size Rule, 
    market makers in certain Nasdaq securities are subject to a minimum 
    quotation size requirement of 100 shares instead of the applicable 
    small order execution system (``SOES'') tier size for that security.
        \13\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 39760 (March 16, 
    1998), 63 FR 13894 (March 23, 1998).
        \14\See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 39718 (March 4, 
    1998), 63 FR 12124 (March 12, 1998). (``IODES Proposal'') Directed 
    orders are those that an order-entry firm chooses to send to a 
    specific Nasdaq market maker, electronic communications network 
    (``ECN'') or UTP exchange for delivery and execution. Non-directed 
    orders are those that are not sent to a particular Nasdaq market 
    maker or ECN. In other words, when the broker-dealer entering the 
    order does not specify the particular Nasdaq market maker, ECN or 
    UTP exchange it wants to access, the order will be sent to the next 
    available executing participant quoting at the national BBO.
        \15\ Portions of the proposed new system are contingent on the 
    approval of the request to implement the Actual Size Rule for all 
    Nasdaq securities. The proposal does, however, contain alternative 
    approaches if the Actual Size Rule is not approved for all Nasdaq 
    securities. See IODES Proposal, supra note 14.
        \16\ The BSE submitted comments to the SEC concerning the 
    proposed new order delivery and execution system's impact on the 
    Plan, preservation of the BSE's rights concerning issues still not 
    agreed upon or specifically covered by the Plan (specifically the 
    need for a trade-through rule). See Comment letter No. 1511, SR-
    NASD-98-17 from Karen A. Aluise, Vice President, BSE to Jonathan G. 
    Katz, Secretary, SEC dated May 14, 1998. In addition, the CHX 
    submitted comments to the SEC concerning the IODES proposal and 
    encouraged the Commission to grant permanent approval of the Plan. 
    See Comment letter No. 1160, SR-NASD-98-17 from Patricia L. Levy, 
    Senior Vice President and General Counsel, CHX to Jonathan G. Katz, 
    Secretary, SEC dated May 13, 1998.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        With respect to the need for a trade through rule, the NASD 
    continues to maintain in the June 1998 Extension Request that it would 
    be more appropriate to address this issue once the issue of electronic 
    access to Nasdaq market makers' quotes has been resolved.
        With regard to the CHX's use of BRASS, by the end of 1998 the CHX 
    intends to replace its existing trade support system for accessing 
    securities subject to the Plan and begin using BRASS, developed by 
    Automated Securities Clearance, Limited (``ASC''). BRASS is a trade 
    support and order routing system which offers subscribers, generally 
    broker-dealers, software and hardware to enable them to perform various 
    functions. ASC grants its subscribers a license to operate the BRASS 
    software through a customized computer terminal purchased from ASC or 
    by running the BRASS software on their own terminals. The CHX has 
    represented that ASC has specifically customized BRASS to meet the 
    special
    
    [[Page 36981]]
    
    needs of the CHX. Among other things, Nasdaq market makers that already 
    subscribe to BRASS will be able to route OTC/UTP orders to specialists 
    on the CHX floor through a SelectNet linkage with BRASS workstations on 
    the CHX floor. Conversely, CHX specialists will be able to route orders 
    into SelectNet through their BRASS workstations.\17\ The Commission 
    notes that ASC will be subject to the Commission's inspection and 
    examination procedures with regards to the specific customized BRASS 
    system that ASC will provide to the CHX because ASC will be operating a 
    facility of an exchange.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \17\See December 1997 Extension Request and Letter from George 
    T. Simon, Foley & Lardner to Howard L. Kramer, Senior Associate 
    Director, Division, SEC, dated December 12, 1997 (``CHX Letter'').
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        The Commission continues to solicit comment regarding the BBO 
    calculation, the trade through rule and the CHX's use of the BRASS 
    system as well as issues presented by changes occurring in the market 
    place.
    
    VI. Discussion
    
        The Commission finds that an extension of temporary approval of the 
    operation of the Plan, as amended, through December 31, 1998, is 
    appropriate and in furtherance of Section 11A of the Act. The 
    Commission believes that such extension will provide the Participants 
    with additional time to seek Commission approval of pending proposals 
    concerning the BBO calculation \18\ and to begin to make reasonable 
    proposals concerning a trade through rule to facilitate the trading of 
    OTC securities pursuant to UTP. In addition, the Commission believes 
    that the extension will afford the CHX adequate time to test the BRASS 
    system, address any operating issues concerning its use and implement 
    it. While the Commission continues to solicit comment on these matters, 
    the Commission believes that these matters should be addressed directly 
    by the Participants on or before September 30, 1998 so that the 
    Commission may have ample time to determine whether to approve the Plan 
    on a permanent basis by December 31, 1998.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \18\ See e.g., Actual Size Rule Release, supra note 13 and IODES 
    Proposal, supra note 14.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        The Commission also finds that it is appropriate to extend the 
    exemptive relief from Rule 11Ac1-2 under the Act until the earlier of 
    December 31, 1998 or until such time as the calculation methodology for 
    the BBO is based on a price/size/time algorithm pursuant to a mutual 
    agreement among the Participants approved by the Commission. The 
    Commission further finds that it is appropriate to extend the exemptive 
    relief from Rule 11Aa3-1 under the Act, that requires transaction 
    reporting plans to include market identifiers for transaction reports 
    and last sale data, to the BSE through December 31, 1998. The 
    Commission believes that the extensions of the exemptive relief 
    provided to vendors and the BSE, respectively, are consistent with the 
    Act, the Rules thereunder, and specifically with the objectives set 
    forth in Sections 12(f) and 11A of the Act and in Rules 11Aa3-1 and 
    11Aa3-2 thereunder.
    
    VII. Solicitation of Comments
    
        Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and 
    arguments concerning the extension, including whether the extension is 
    consistent with the Act. Persons making written submissions should file 
    six copies thereof with the Secretary, Securities and Exchange 
    Commission, 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549. Copies of 
    the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with 
    respect to the proposed plan amendment that are filed with the 
    Commission and all written communications relating to the proposed plan 
    amendment between the Commission and any person, other than those that 
    may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 
    U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and copying at the 
    Commission's Public Reference Room. All submissions should refer to 
    File No. S7-24-89 and should be submitted by [insert date 21 days from 
    date of publication].
    
    VIII. Conclusion
    
        It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Sections 12(f) and 11A and the 
    Act and paragraph (c)(2) of Rule 11Aa3-2 thereunder, that the 
    Participants' request to extend the effectiveness of the Joint 
    Transaction Reporting Plan, as amended, for Nasdaq/National Market 
    securities traded on an exchange on an unlisted or listed basis through 
    December 31, 1998, and certain exemptive relief until December 31, 
    1998, is approved.
    
        For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, 
    pursuant to delegated authority.\19\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \19\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(29).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Margaret H. McFarland,
    Deputy Secretary.
    [FR Doc. 98-18053 Filed 7-7-98; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
07/08/1998
Department:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
98-18053
Pages:
36979-36981 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Release No. 34-40151, File No. S7-24-89
PDF File:
98-18053.pdf