[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 130 (Wednesday, July 8, 1998)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 36868-36870]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-18096]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement
30 CFR Part 944
[SPATS No. UT-039-FOR]
Utah Regulatory Program
AGENCY: Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule; public comment period and opportunity for public
hearing on proposed amendment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (OSM)
is announcing receipt of a proposed amendment to the Utah regulatory
program (the ``Utah program'') under the Surface Mining Control and
Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA). Utah's amendment proposes changes in
requirements for coal mine permit application approval in section 40-
10-11 of the Utah Code Annotated (UCA) (hereafter, also the ``Utah
Code''). The State proposes the changes to update language used to
describe the approval process and information documented during that
process. In addition, Utah proposes a change to subsection (f) of UCA
40-10-11(2) to clarify limitations on authority of the Division and to
the Board of Oil, Gas and Mining with respect to property right
disputes. Utah also proposes to revise provisions applicable to a
permit applicant's list of violations of air and water protection at
subsection (3) of section 40-10-11 in response to an amendment required
by OSM and described at 30 CFR 944.16(f)(2).
The amendment is intended to revise the Utah program to be
consistent with the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977
(SMCRA) regulations and to improve operational efficiency.
DATES: Written comments must be received by 4:00 p.m., m.d.t. August 7,
1998. If requested, a public hearing on the proposed amendment will be
held on August 2, 1998. Requests to present oral testimony at the
hearing must be received by 4:00 p.m., m.d.t. on July 23, 1998.
[[Page 36869]]
ADDRESSES: Written comments should be mailed or hand delivered to James
F. Fulton at the address listed below.
Copies of the Utah program, the proposed amendment, and all written
comments received in response to this document will be available for
public review at the addresses listed below during normal business
hours, Monday through Friday, excluding holidays. Each requester may
receive one free copy of the proposed amendment by contacting OSM's
Denver Field Division.
James F. Fulton, Chief, Denver Field Division, Office of Surface Mining
Reclamation and Enforcement, 1999 Broadway, Suite 3320, Denver,
Colorado 80202-5733, Telephone: (303) 844-1424.
Lowell P. Braxton, Acting Director, Division of Oil, Gas and Mining,
1594 West North Temple, Suite 1210, P.O. Box 145801, Salt Lake City,
Utah 84114-5801, Telephone: (801) 538-5340.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
James F. Fulton, Chief, Denver Field Division, Telephone: (303) 844-
1424.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background on the Utah Program
On January 21, 1981, the Secretary of the Interior conditionally
approved the Utah program. General background information on the Utah
program, including the Secretary's findings, the disposition of
comments, and the conditions of approval of the Utah program can be
found in the January 21, 1981, Federal Register (46 FR 5899).
Subsequent actions concerning Utah's program and program amendments can
be found at 30 CFR 944.15, 944.16, and 944.30.
II. Proposed Amendment
By letter dated June 8, 1998, (administrative record No. UT-1117)
Utah submitted a proposed amendment (SPATS No. UT-039-FOR,
administrative record No. 1117) to its program pursuant to SMCRA (30
U.S.C. 1201 et seq.). Utah submitted the proposed amendment at its own
initiative and in response to a requirement imposed by the Director
resulting from OSM's review of a previous amendment to the Utah Code.
The proposed amendment consists of revisions to UCA 40-10-11. This
section of the Utah Code pertains to actions by the Division of Oil,
Gas and Mining (the Division) to approve or deny coal mine permit
applications. It also includes provisions for considering, in the
permit approval/denial process, an applicant's violations of air and
water protection provisions and whether an area proposed for mining
includes prime farmlands.
Most of Utah's proposed changes reword existing provisions of UCA
40-10-11 in current writing style and break-up existing provisions into
subsections. In that context, specific changes Utah proposes include:
Revising existing UCA 40-10-11(1) to include new subsections (1)(a)(i)
and (ii), (1)(b), (1)(c), and (1)(c)(i) and (ii); revising UCA 40-10-
11(2)(d) to include new subsections 2(d)(i) and 2(d)(ii); adding new
subsections (e)(i)(A) and (B) to UCA 40-10-11(2)(e)(i); revising UCA
40-10-11(2)(f)(i) to include (f)(i)(A) and (B); changing UCA 40-10-
11(3) to include new subsections (3)(a)(i), (ii) and (3)(b) and (c);
and breaking-up existing UCA 40-10-11(4)(a)(i) and (ii). Utah also
proposes to update language under several parts of UCA 40-10-11(1),
(2), (3), (4) and (5).
In two cases, the State's proposed changes add new provisions to
the Utah Code. At UCA 40-10-11((2)(f)(i)(B), Utah proposes to add a
statement to the effect that nothing in UCA 40-10-11(2) shall be
construed ``* * * to authorize the board or division to adjudicate
property right disputes * * *'' in cases where permit applications
involve lands on which the mineral estate has been severed from the
private surface estate. Second, in new subsection (c) of UCA 40-10-
11(3), Utah proposes to preclude permit issuance in cases in which the
Board finds that an applicant or operator controls or has controlled
mining operations with a demonstrated pattern of willful violations of
SMCRA, the implementing regulations, or of any state or federal
programs enacted under SMCRA or under other provisions of the approved
Utah program, in addition to violations of the Utah Code. The State
proposes this new provision in response to the requirement described at
30 CFR 944.16(f)(2) that the Utah Code's provision for denying permits
on the basis of patterns of violations be no less stringent than the
Federal counterpart provision at section 510(c) of SMCRA. The required
amendment resulted from OSM's review of a previous amendment to the
Utah Code (UT-024-FOR; 60 FR 37002, July 19, 1995; administrative
record No. UT-1066). OSM later reiterated the need for Utah to amend
UCA 40-10-11(3) in its review of Code amendment UT-035-FOR (62 FR
41845, August 4, 1997; administrative record No. UT-1098).
III. Public Comment Procedures
In accordance with the provisions of 30 CFR 732.17(h), OSM is
seeking comments on whether the proposed amendment satisfies the
applicable program approval criteria of 30 CFR 732.15. If OSM finds the
amendment adequate, it will become part of the Utah program.
1. Written Comments
Written comments should be specific, pertain only to the issues
proposed in this rulemaking, and include explanations in support of the
commenter's recommendations. OSM will not necessarily consider comments
in the final rulemaking that it receives after the time indicated under
``DATES'' or that it receives at locations other than the Denver Field
Division. OSM will not necessarily include such comments in the
admininstrative record, either.
2. Public Hearing
Persons wishing to testify at the public hearing should contact the
person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT by 4:00 p.m.,
m.d.t. on July 23, 1998. Any disabled individual who has need for a
special accommodation to attend a public hearing should contact the
individual listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. OSM will
arrange the location and time of the hearing with those persons
requesting the hearing. OSM will not hold a public hearing if no one
requests an opportunity to testify at a hearing.
OSM requests that commenters file a written statement at the time
of the hearing because doing so will greatly assist the transcriber. If
commenters submit written statements in advance of the hearing, OSM
will be able to prepare adequate responses and appropriate questions.
The public hearing will continue on the specified date until all
persons scheduled to testify have been heard. Persons in the audience
who have not been scheduled to testify, and who wish to do so, will be
heard following those who have been scheduled. The hearing will end
after all persons scheduled to testify and persons present in the
audience who wish to testify have been heard.
3. Public Meeting
OSM may hold a public meeting if only one person requests an
opportunity to testify at a public hearing. Persons wishing to meet
with OSM representatives to discuss the proposed amendment may request
a meeting by contacting the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT. All such meetings will be open to the public and, if possible
OSM will post notices of meetings at the locations listed under
ADDRESSES. OSM will make a written
[[Page 36870]]
summary of each meeting part of the administrative record.
IV. Procedural Determinations
1. Executive Order 12866
This rule is exempted from review by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) under Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory Planning and
Review).
2. Executive Order 12988
The Department of the Interior conducted the reviews required by
section 3 of Executive Order 12988 (Civil Justice Reform) and
determined that his rule meets the applicable standards of subsections
(a) and (b) of that section. However, these standards are not
applicable to the actual language of State regulatory programs and
program amendments since each such program is drafted and promulgated
by a specific State, not by OSM. Under sections 503 and 505 of SMCRA
(30 U.S.C. 1253 and 1255) and the Federal regulations at 30 CFR 730.11,
732.15, and 732.17(h)(10), decisions on proposed State regulatory
programs and program amendments submitted by the States must be based
solely on a determination of whether the submittal is consistent with
SMCRA and its implementating Federal regulations and whether the other
requirements of 30 CFR Parts 730, 731, and 732 have been met.
3. National Environmental Policy Act
No environmental impact statement is required for this rule since
section 702(d) of SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1292(d)) provides that agency
decisions on proposed State regulatory program provisions do not
constitute major Federal actions within the meaning of section
102(2)(C) of the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C.
4332(2)(C)).
4. Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not contain information collection requirements that
require approval by OMB under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
3507 et seq.).
5. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Department of the Interior determined that this rule will not
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. et seq.). The
State submittal that is the subject of this rule is based upon
counterpart Federal regulations for which an economic analysis was
prepared and certification made that such regulations would not have a
significant economic effect upon a substantial number of small
entities. Accordingly, this rule will ensure that existing requirements
previously promulgated by OSM will be implemented by the State. In
making the determination as to whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact, the Department relied upon the data and
assumptions for the counterpart Federal regulations.
6. Unfunded Mandates
This rule will not impose a cost of $100 million or more in any
given year on any governmental entity or the private sector.
List of Subjects in 30 CFR Part 944
Intergovernmental relations, Surface mining, Underground mining.
Dated: June 29, 1998.
Richard J. Seibel,
Regional Director, Western Regional Coordinating Center.
[FR Doc. 98-18096 Filed 7-7-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-05-M
