96-17321. Clean Water Act Section 303(d): Availability of List Submissions and Proposed Decisions  

  • [Federal Register Volume 61, Number 132 (Tuesday, July 9, 1996)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 36059-36060]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 96-17321]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    [FRL-5532-9]
    
    
    Clean Water Act Section 303(d): Availability of List Submissions 
    and Proposed Decisions
    
    AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.
    
    ACTION: Notice of Availability.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This notice announces the availability of lists submitted to 
    EPA by California and Hawaii pursuant to Clean Water Act Section 
    303(d)(2) as well as EPA's proposed decisions regarding these 
    submissions, and requests public comment. Section 303(d)(2) requires 
    that states submit and EPA approve or disapprove lists of waters for 
    which existing technology-based pollution controls are not stringent 
    enough to attain or maintain state water quality standards and for 
    which total maximum daily loads (TMDLs) must be prepared.
        On June 14, 1996, EPA partially approved California's submittal.
    
    [[Page 36060]]
    
    Specifically, EPA approved California's listing of waters except for 
    waters listed in the Santa Ana Region of California. Today, EPA is 
    proposing to:
        (1) approve California's 303(d) submission of waters in the Santa 
    Ana Region,
        (2) disapprove California's decisions not to list Ten Mile River 
    for sediment and Navarro River, which is already listed for sediment, 
    for temperature,
        (3) add the Ten Mile River for sediment and the Navarro River for 
    temperature to California's 1996 303(d) list, and
        (4) approve Hawaii's 303(d) submission.
        EPA is providing the public the opportunity to review these 
    proposed decisions as required by Public Participation regulations [40 
    CFR Part 25]. EPA will consider public comments in reaching its final 
    decisions on California and Hawaii's final lists.
    
    DATES: Comments must be submitted to EPA on or before August 8, 1996.
    
    ADDRESSES: Comments on the proposed decisions should be sent to David 
    Smith, TMDL Coordinator, Water Division, U.S. Environmental Protection 
    Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105, 
    telephone (415) 744-2012, facsimile (415) 744-1078. Copies of the 
    proposed decisions concerning California and Hawaii which explain the 
    rationale for EPA's proposed decisions can be obtained by writing or 
    calling Mr. Smith at the above address. Underlying documentation 
    comprising the record for this decision is available for public 
    inspection at the above address.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Smith at (415) 744-2012.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 303(d) of the Clean Water Act (CWA) 
    requires that each state identify those waters for which existing 
    technology-based pollution controls are not stringent enough to attain 
    or maintain state water quality standards. For those waters, states are 
    required to establish TMDLs according to a priority ranking.
        On January 11, 1985, EPA published the Water Quality Planning and 
    Management regulations [50 FR 1775]. These regulations included 
    requirements related to the implementation of Section 303(d) of the CWA 
    [40 CFR 130.7]. The regulations did not specify dates for state 
    compliance with the Section 303(d) requirements, but reiterated the 
    statutory provisions calling for submissions from time to time. On July 
    24, 1992, EPA published a final rule [57 FR 143] that amended 40 CFR 
    130.7 to establish that, for the purposes of identifying water quality-
    limited waters still requiring TMDLs, ``from time to time'' means once 
    every two years. The list of waters still needing TMDLs must also 
    include a priority ranking and must identify the waters targeted for 
    TMDL development during the next two years [40 CFR 130.7].
        Consistent with EPA's revised regulations, California submitted to 
    EPA for its approval its listing decisions under Section 303(d)(2). EPA 
    today proposes to:
        (1) decline to make a final decision to approve the listings and 
    priority rankings for the Santa Ana RWQCB (Region 8) because that 
    Regional Board provided insufficient opportunity for public 
    participation, and instead propose to approve the listings and priority 
    rankings, with EPA's final decision to approve or disapprove to be 
    issued after consideration of public comment, (2) propose disapproval 
    of the State's decision not to list Ten Mile River for sediment and 
    Navarro River for temperature, and (3) propose a final decision to add 
    Ten Mile River for sediment and Navarro River for temperature to the 
    State's 1996 list and establish appropriate priority rankings.
        EPA solicits public comment on California's list of waters in the 
    Santa Ana Region and EPA's proposed decision to approve these listings, 
    EPA's proposed decision to disapprove California's decisions concerning 
    Ten Mile River and Navarro River, and EPA's proposed decision to add 
    the Ten Mile River for sediment and the Navarro River for temperature 
    to California's final 1996 Section 303(d) list.
        Hawaii also submitted to EPA for its approval its listing decisions 
    under Section 303(d)(2). EPA today proposes to fully approve Hawaii's 
    list of waters needing TMDLs, priority rankings, and list of waters 
    targeted for TMDL development during the next two years. EPA solicits 
    public comment on Hawaii's lists and EPA's proposed approval decision.
        EPA notes that it does not normally solicit public comment on its 
    decisions to approve state Section 303(d) lists. Pursuant to the public 
    participation requirements of 40 CFR 25, EPA is providing this 
    opportunity for public review and comment on its proposed approval 
    decisions because California provided inadequate opportunity for public 
    comment during development of its lists for the Santa Ana Region, and 
    Hawaii provided no opportunity for public comment during the 
    development of its lists. In the future, EPA expects that states will 
    provide adequate opportunities for public comment during development of 
    the state lists.
    
        Dated: June 14, 1996.
    John Ong,
    Acting Director, Water Management Division.
    [FR Doc. 96-17321 Filed 7-8-96; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
07/09/1996
Department:
Environmental Protection Agency
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Notice of Availability.
Document Number:
96-17321
Dates:
Comments must be submitted to EPA on or before August 8, 1996.
Pages:
36059-36060 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
FRL-5532-9
PDF File:
96-17321.pdf