94-18560. Testing Consent Order For Bisphenol A Diglycidyl Ether  

  • [Federal Register Volume 59, Number 146 (Monday, August 1, 1994)]
    [Unknown Section]
    [Page 0]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 94-18560]
    
    
    [[Page Unknown]]
    
    [Federal Register: August 1, 1994]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    40 CFR Part 799
    
    [OPPTS-42168; FRL 4642-3]
    
     
    
    Testing Consent Order For Bisphenol A Diglycidyl Ether
    
    AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
    
    ACTION: Final Consent Agreement and Order; Final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: EPA has issued a Testing Consent Order that incorporates an 
    Enforceable Consent Agreement (ECA) pursuant to the Toxic Substances 
    Control Act (TSCA), with the Dow Chemical Company, Shell Oil Company, 
    and Ciba-Geigy Corporation, (the Companies) who have agreed to perform 
    certain health effects tests and an exposure evaluation test with 
    bisphenol A diglycidyl ether (DGEBPA; CAS No. 1675-543). This document 
    summarizes the ECA, amends 40 CFR 799.5000 by adding DGEBPA to the list 
    of chemical substances and mixtures subject to ECAs and deletes DGEBPA 
    from the proposed test rule for the category glycidol and its 
    derivatives. Accordingly, the export notification requirements of 40 
    CFR part 707 apply to DGEBPA.
    
    EFFECTIVE DATE: August 1, 1994.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Susan Hazen, Director, Environmental 
    Assistance Division (7408), Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics, 
    Rm. E-543B, 401 M St., SW., Washington, DC 20460, (202) 554-1404, TDD 
    (202) 554-0551.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This document amends 40 CFR 799.5000 by 
    adding DGEBPA to the list of chemical substances and mixtures subject 
    to ECAs and export notification requirements.
    
    I. Regulatory History
    
    A. ITC Designation
    
        In its Third Report to the Administrator of the Environmental 
    Protection Agency, published in the Federal Register on October 30, 
    1978 (43 FR 50630), the Interagency Testing Committee (ITC) designated 
    the category of ``glycidol and its derivatives'' for priority 
    consideration for health effects testing in the following areas: 
    mutagenicity, carcinogenicity, and other adverse health effects, with 
    particular emphasis on the reproductive system. Epidemiology studies 
    were also recommended. The rationale for the original designation is 
    discussed in the Federal Register of October 30, 1978 (43 FR 50630). 
    This chemical category was defined by the ITC as all substances of the 
    general formula:
    
    TR01AU94.012
    
    where R is a hydrogen atom or any alkyl, aryl, or acyl group. R is 
    unrestricted as to the number and type of substitutes it may carry.
        In evaluating the testing needs for glycidyls, EPA considered all 
    relevant information, including the following: information presented in 
    the ITC's report; information regarding production volume, use, 
    exposure, and release reported by manufacturers of glycidyls under the 
    TSCA section 8(a) Preliminary Assessment Information Rule (40 CFR part 
    712); health and safety studies submitted under TSCA section 8(d) 
    Health and Safety Reporting Rule (40 CFR part 716) for glycidyls; and 
    published and unpublished information available to EPA. On December 30, 
    1983, EPA published an advanced notice of proposed rulemaking (ANPR) in 
    the Federal Register (48 FR 57562) to require testing glycidyls under 
    section 4(a) of TSCA.
        EPA evaluated and responded to public comments on the ANPR in a 
    document (Ref. 1), entitled ``Support Document for Glycidol and its 
    Derivatives: Responses to Public Comments on the Advance Notice of 
    Proposed Rulemaking'' (December, 1989).
        In addition, EPA developed a technical support document for 
    glycidol and its derivatives (Ref. 2). This document includes data on 
    the identity and chemical/physical properties of the substances 
    contained in this chemical category, as well as information on the 
    production, uses, chemical fate, human exposure, and health effects for 
    these substances. Subsequently, EPA summarized the information in this 
    technical support document, as well as more recent information from 
    other sources, in an additional support document for glycidyls (Ref. 3) 
    outlining the data supporting EPA's findings under section 4(a)(1) of 
    TSCA for certain substances contained in the category.
        A meeting was held on May 17, 1984, between representatives from 
    the Epoxy Resins Program Panel of the Chemical Manufacturers 
    Association (CMA) and EPA personnel concerning this chemical category. 
    Meetings were also held on January 25, 1989, and May 17, 1989, between 
    EPA and representatives of various working units of the Society of the 
    Plastics Industry, Inc. (SPI). An Epoxides Workshop was held on April 
    25, 1990, at which EPA personnel and representatives of SPI were 
    scheduled to discuss, among other topics, the glycidyls testing 
    category as it relates to the broader issues concerning epoxides in 
    general. Copies of the overhead slides, which were supplied in advance 
    to SPI, have been placed in the record for the proposed rulemaking, 
    along with summaries of the meetings held and copies of all support 
    documents.
    
    B. Proposed Test Rule
    
        EPA published a proposed test rule for the category glycidol and 
    its derivatives (56 FR 57144, November 7, 1991). EPA proposed health 
    effects testing which included testing for subchronic toxicity, 
    developmental toxicity, reproductive toxicity, neurotoxicity, 
    mutagenicity, and oncogenicity.
        EPA evaluated the public comments submitted after the test rule was 
    proposed and responded to these comments in a document entitled 
    ``Support Document for Glycidol and its Derivatives: Responses to 
    Public Comments on the Proposed Rulemaking; DGEBPA'' (July, 1993) (Ref. 
    4).
    
    C. Enforceable Consent Agreement Negotiations
    
        On July 17, 1992, EPA published a Federal Register notice (57 FR 
    31714) announcing an ``open season.'' The ``open season'' was a period 
    during which manufacturers could submit to EPA proposals for testing 
    chemical substances which had been proposed for testing by EPA but had 
    not been subject to a final test rule. In that notice, EPA indicated 
    that it would review the submissions and select candidates for 
    negotiation of ECAs pursuant to 40 CFR part 790. EPA also indicated 
    that it would later publish a Federal Register notice soliciting 
    persons interested in participating in or monitoring negotiations for 
    the development of ECAs on the chemicals selected.
        On March 30, 1993, EPA published a Federal Register notice (58 FR 
    16669) announcing candidates selected for ECA negotiations and 
    requesting that interested parties identify themselves to EPA. One of 
    the glycidyls, DGEBPA, was selected. The notice established EPA's 
    priority for initiating negotiations on the chemicals selected, and 
    DGEBPA was among the chemicals assigned a high priority. The notice 
    announced tentative dates for starting negotiations on DGEBPA and the 
    other high-priority chemicals.
        The Dow Chemical Company, Shell Oil Company, and Ciba-Geigy 
    Corporation identified themselves through their agent, SPI, as 
    interested parties. On May 18, 1993, EPA held a public meeting attended 
    by representatives of interested parties. At the public meeting, SPI, 
    on behalf of its member companies, presented a proposed testing plan 
    and provided test protocols (Ref. 5) which would characterize the 
    potential of DGEBPA for oncogenicity, neurotoxicity, male reproductive 
    toxicity, and mutagenicity. In addition, SPI offered to undertake a 
    glove permeability study and to implement a product stewardship program 
    as a means of assessing and reducing worker exposure to DGEBPA. EPA 
    also made available its draft proposal for testing on DGEBPA.
        On June 1, 1993, EPA requested additional information from SPI to 
    be used in conjunction with evaluating the testing plan (Ref. 6). In 
    response to EPA's request, SPI submitted information (Refs. 7 through 
    15) and requested an opportunity to meet with EPA again.
        On June 29, 1993, EPA convened a second public meeting attended by 
    representatives of interested parties. At the public meeting, SPI, on 
    behalf of its member companies, presented a testing proposal and test 
    protocols (Ref. 16). Protocols were presented for a 2-year bioassay, a 
    subchronic study (with satellite studies for testing for reproductive 
    toxicity, neurotoxicity, and mutagenicity); all studies would be 
    conducted via the dermal route of exposure. In addition, SPI reiterated 
    its offer to perform a glove permeability study and implement a product 
    stewardship program for DGEBPA.
        EPA proposed that all testing of DGEBPA be conducted via the oral 
    route of administration. After consideration of SPI's proposed testing 
    plan and review of new information (Refs. 17, 18 and 19) submitted to 
    EPA by SPI, EPA has determined that testing via the dermal route of 
    exposure is consistent with DGEBPA's physical properties and the 
    typical route of human exposure to DGEBPA, that significant systemic 
    absorption occurs when DGEBPA is applied dermally, and that a higher 
    percentage of parent compound will be absorbed if administered dermally 
    than if given orally and extensively hydrolyzed at acid pH of the 
    stomach. For these reasons, testing via the dermal route of exposure is 
    appropriate.
        EPA proposed testing DGEBPA for developmental toxicity. After 
    considering new information presented to EPA by SPI (Refs. 20, 21 and 
    22), EPA has determined that sufficient information already exists to 
    evaluate the potential for developmental toxicity from exposure to 
    DGEBPA. For this reason, further tests are not needed at this time.
        EPA proposed testing DGEBPA for mutagenicity1. After 
    consideration of SPI's proposed testing plan and new information 
    presented to EPA by SPI (Ref. 7), EPA has determined that for many of 
    the tests proposed, information has already been developed; thus these 
    tests are no longer necessary.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \S\pecifically, EPA proposed the salmonella typhimurium, reverse 
    mutation assay, detection of gene mutations in somatic cells in 
    culture, sex linked recessive lethal test in drosophila 
    melanogaster, a mouse specific-locus assay or mouse biochemical 
    specific assay, in vitro mammalian cytogenetics assay, in vivo 
    mammalian cytogenetics assay, rodent dominant lethal assay, and a 
    rodent heritable translocation assay for DGEBPA.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        The Companies have agreed to perform testing for oncogenicity, 
    subchronic toxicity, reproductive toxicity, and neurotoxicity, and 
    glove permeability by specified dates according to test standards 
    described below. In addition, the Companies are voluntarily developing 
    and implementing a DGEBPA product stewardship program (PSP) that 
    includes the following primary elements: application and communication 
    of health and safety data; new data development; pollution prevention, 
    waste minimization, and other exposure reduction actions; and 
    continuous improvement in measurement and reporting activities. EPA 
    believes that this PSP makes significant progress toward reducing the 
    potential risk of injury to health and the environment posed by 
    exposure to DGEBPA. The results of the testing program in the DGEBPA 
    ECA are expected to aid in the periodic EPA and industry evaluation of 
    the PSP to determine its adequacy and effectiveness.
    
    II. Production, Use, and Exposure
    
        DGEBPA and other glycidyl derivatives are produced by reacting 
    epichlorohydrin with a compound having one or more active hydrogen 
    atoms, followed by dehydrohalogenation (Ref. 23). On the basis of the 
    Inventory Update Rule (40 CFR part 710, subpart B) or from other 
    sources, EPA estimates annual production volume for DGEBPA to be 
    approximately 400 million pounds (Ref. 5). The production volume of 
    DGEBPA, represents greater than 95 percent of the total volume of 
    production for the entire category of glycidol and its derivatives.
        The uses for all glycidyls are listed in the technical support 
    document developed after the ANPR was published (Ref. 2). Primarily, 
    DGEBPA is the principal component in epoxy resins. Other glycidyl 
    compounds are used as reactive diluents. Resins which are then reacted 
    with curing agents to yield high performance thermosetting plastics, 
    used in a large variety of application such as strong adhesives or 
    coatings.
        Glycidol and its esters and ethers are produced within ``closed 
    systems'' (Refs. 24 and 25); however, EPA believes that some worker 
    exposure may occur during this production process, due to intermittent 
    high-level exposures during maintenance operations, or resulting from 
    spills or leaks from the ``closed systems.''
        In addition, workers may be exposed by the dermal and inhalation 
    routes to glycidyl derivatives during the processing of glycidyl ethers 
    and esters for various uses, particularly since these processes are 
    generally conducted in an open system (Ref. 24). The National Institute 
    for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) has estimated the number of 
    workers potentially exposed to glycidol and its derivatives, and these 
    estimates appear in an exposure support document prepared for the 
    proposed rulemaking (Ref. 24). NIOSH has estimated that 36,697 workers 
    in the United States are potentially exposed to glycidol, that 52,838 
    workers may be exposed to glycidyl ethers, and that 42,469 workers may 
    be exposed to glycidyl esters. Furthermore, recent estimates suggest 
    that up to 3 million people in the United States may be exposed to 
    DGEBPA through the consumer and commercial use of epoxy resins (Ref. 
    25).
    
    III. Testing Program
    
        The Companies have agreed to complete the following testing:
    
                      Table 1.--Testing Required For DGEBPA                 
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                            Deadline for                    
      Description of   Test Standard (40    Final Reports     Final Report  
          Tests          CFR citation)        Months\1\         Date\2\     
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    2-year Bioassay..  798.3320 as        53                8               
                        amended                                             
                        (Appendix I)                                        
    Subchronic         798.2250 as        21                3               
     Toxicity Study.    amended                                             
                        (Appendix II)                                       
    Functional         798.6050 as        21                3               
     Observation        amended                                             
     Battery:           (Appendix III)                                      
     subchronic.                                                            
    Motor Activity     798.6200 as        21                3               
     Test: subchronic.  amended                                             
                        (Appendix III)                                      
    Neuropathology:    798.6400 as        21                3               
     subchronic.        amended                                             
                        (Appendix III)                                      
    Functional         798.6050 as        12\4\             1               
     Observation        amended                                             
     Battery:           (Appendix IV)                                       
     acute\3\.                                                              
    Motor Activity     798.6200 as        12\6\             1               
     Test: acute\5\.    amended                                             
                        (Appendix IV)                                       
    Neuropathology     798.6400 as        12\8\             1               
     Test: acute\7\.    amended                                             
                        (Appendix IV)                                       
    Reproductive       798.4700 as        21                3               
     Toxicity Test.     amended                                             
                        (Appendix V)                                        
    Glove              ASTM as amended    12                1               
     Permeability       (Appendix VI)                                       
     Test.                                                                  
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    \1\ Number of months after the effective date of the Consent Order.     
    \2\ Interim reports are required every 6 months from the effective date 
      until the final report is submitted. This column shows the number of  
      interim reports required for each test.                               
    \3\ If the Agency determines that the results of the subchronic study   
      are not negative, then this required testing must be performed.       
    \4\ Figure indicates that reporting deadline, in months, calculated from
      the date of notification of the test sponsor by certified letter or   
      Federal Register notice, that the Agency has determined that this     
      required testing must be performed.                                   
    \5\ If the Agency determines that the results of the subchronic study   
      are not negative, then this required testing must be performed.       
    \6\ Figure indicates that reporting deadline, in months, calculated from
      the date of notification of the test sponsor by certified letter or   
      Federal Register notice, that the Agency has determined that this     
      required testing must be performed.                                   
    \7\ If the Agency determines that the results of the subchronic study   
      are not negative, then this required testing must be performed.       
    \8\ Figure indicates that reporting deadline, in months, calculated from
      the date of notification of the test sponsor by certified letter or   
      Federal Register notice, that the Agency has determined that this     
      required testing must be performed.                                   
    
    IV. Export Notification
    
        The issuance of the ECA and Order subjects any persons who export 
    or intend to export the chemical substance, DGEBPA (CAS No. 1675-54-3), 
    of any purity, to the export notification requirements of section 12(b) 
    of TSCA and the regulations promulgated pursuant to it at 40 CFR part 
    707. The listing of the chemical substance or mixture at 40 CFR 
    799.5000 serves as a notification to persons who intend to export such 
    chemical substance or mixture that the substance or mixture is the 
    subject of an ECA and Order and 40 CFR part 707 applies.
    
    V. Deletion from Proposed Rule
    
        EPA and the Companies have agreed that the DGEBPA testing 
    requirements in the proposed rule will be met by implementing the ECA 
    and Order, and the issuance of the ECA and Order by EPA constitutes 
    final EPA action for purposes of 5 U.S.C. 704. Therefore, the proposed 
    testing rule of DGEBPA, in the proposed test rule for the category 
    glycidol and its derivatives, published at 56 FR 57144, November 7, 
    1991, will not be adopted as final.
    
    VI. Public Record
    
    A. Supporting Documentation
    
        EPA has established a record for this ECA and Order, under docket 
    number OPPTS-42168, which is available for inspection Monday through 
    Friday, excluding legal holidays, in the TSCA Nonconfidential 
    Information Center, NE B607 401 M St., SW., Washington, DC., 20460, 
    from 1 p.m. to 4 p.m. Information claimed as Confidential Business 
    Information (CBI) while a part of the record, is not available for 
    public review. This record contains the basic information considered in 
    developing this ECA and Order and includes the following information:
        (1) Testing Consent Order for DGEBPA, with incorporated Enforceable 
    Consent Agreement and associated testing protocols attached as 
    appendices.
        (2) Federal Register notices pertaining to this notice and the 
    Testing Consent Order incorporating the ECA consisting of:
        (a) Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for Glycidol and its Derivatives, 
    (November 7, 1991, 56 FR 57144).
        (b) Notice announcing opportunity to initiate negotiations for TSCA 
    section 4 testing consent agreements (July 17, 1992, 57 FR 31714).
        (3) Communications consisting of:
        (a) Written letters.
        (b) Contact reports of telephone summaries.
        (c) Meeting summaries.
        (4) Reports - published and unpublished factual materials.
    
    B. References
    
        (1) USEPA, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Test Rules 
    Development Branch. ``Support Document for Glycidol and its 
    Derivatives: Responses to Comments on the Advance Notice of Proposed 
    Rulemaking.'' (December, 1989).
        (2) Syracuse Research Corporation. ``Draft Final Technical 
    Support Document: Glycidol and its Derivatives.'' (November 11, 
    1986).
        (3) USEPA. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Test Rules 
    Development Branch. ``Support Document for Glycidol and its 
    Derivatives: Review of Available Health Effects Data.'' (October, 
    1987).
        (4) USEPA. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Chemical 
    Testing and Information Branch. ``Support Document for Glycidol and 
    its Derivatives: Responses to Comments on the Proposed Rulemaking; 
    Bisphenol A diglycidyl ether.'' (September, 1993).
        (5) The Society of the Plastics Industry, Inc. ``DGEBPA 
    Enforceable Consent Agreement Presentation.'' (May 18, 1993).
        (6) USEPA. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. ``Diglycidyl 
    ether of Bisphenol A, Review of Testing Proposal,'' letter from 
    Keith J. Cronin to Lynn R. Harris (Society of the Plastics Industry 
    Inc.). (June, 1993).
        (7) Pullin, Terry, G. Report to the Dow Chemical Company 
    entitled: ``Integrated Mutagenicity Testing Program on Several Epoxy 
    Compounds.'' (December 28, 1977).
        (8) Bently, et al., ``Hydrolysis of bisphenol A diglycidyl ether 
    by epoxide hydrolases in cytosolic and microsomal fractions of mouse 
    liver and skin: inhibition by bis epoxycyclopentylether and the 
    effects upon the covalent binding to mouse skin DNA.'' 
    Carcinogenesis, vol. 10, no. 2 pp. 321-327, 1989.
        (9) Magdalou, J., and Hammock, B. ``1,2 Epoxycycloalkanes: 
    Substrates and Inhibitors of Microsomal and Cytosolic Epoxide 
    Hydrolases in Mouse Liver.'' Biochemical Pharmacology, vol. 37, no. 
    14, pp. 2717-2722, 1988.
        (10) DiGiovanni, J. ``Multistage Carcinogenesis in Mouse Skin.'' 
    Pharmacology Therapeutics, vol. 54, pp. 63-128, 1992
        (11) Li, D., and Randerath, K. ``Strain differences of I-
    compounds in relation to organ sites of spontaneous tumorigenesis 
    and non-neoplastic renal diseases in mice.'' Carcinogenesis, vol. 
    11, no. 2 pp. 251-255, 1990.
        (12) Rao, et al. ``Mouse Strains for Chemical Carcinogenicity 
    Studies: Overview of Workshop.'' Fundamental and Applied Toxicology, 
    vol. 10, pp. 385-394, 1988.
        (13) USEPA. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Summary of: 
    ``Workshop on Carcinogenesis Bioassay via the Dermal Route.'' (April 
    29, 1987).
        (14) USEPA. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Summary of: 
    ``Second EPA Workshop on Carcinogenesis via the Dermal Route.'' (May 
    18, 1988).
        (15) USEPA. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Office of 
    Pesticides and Toxic Substances. Atlas of Dermal Lesions (August, 
    1990).
        (16) The Society of the Plastics Industry, Inc. ``DGEBPA 
    Enforceable Consent Agreement Presentation.'' (June 29, 1993).
        (17) Nolan, R., and Unger, L. Report to the Dow Chemical Company 
    entitled: ``Diglycidyl Ether of Bisphenol A (DGEBPA): Fate in Male 
    Fischer 344 Rats (Probe).'' (December 15, 1981).
        (18) Climie, et al. ``Metabolism of the epoxy resin component 
    2,2-bis[4-(2,3-epoxypropoxy)phenyl]propane, the diglycidyl ether of 
    bisphenol A (DGEBPA) in the mouse.'' Part I ``A comparison of the 
    fate of a single oral dose of 14C-DGEBPA.'' Xenobiotica, vol. 11, 
    no.6, pps 391-300, 1981.
        (19) Climie, et al. ``Metabolism of the epoxy resin component 
    2,2-bis[4-(2,3-epoxypropoxy)phenyl]propane, the diglycidyl ether of 
    bisphenol A (DGEBPA) in the mouse.'' Part II - ``Identification of 
    metabolites in urine and faeces following a single oral dose of 14C-
    DGEBPA.'' Xenobiotica, vol.11, no.6, pps 401-424, 1981.
        (20) Smith, et al. Report to Ciba-Geigy Ltd., entitled: ``A 
    Study of the Effect of TK 10490 on the Pregnancy of the Rat.'' (July 
    19, 1988).
        (21) Smith, et al. Report to Ciba-Geigy Ltd., entitled: ``A 
    Study of the Effect of TK 10490 on the Pregnancy of the Rabbit.'' 
    (July 19, 1988).
        (22) Smith, et al. Report to Ciba-Geigy Ltd., entitled: ``A 
    Study of the Effect of TK 10490 on Reproductive Function of One 
    Generation in the Rat.'' (February 2, 1989).
        (23) Lee, H., and Neville, K. ``Epoxy Resins.'' In: Encyclopedia 
    of Polymer Science and Technology, vol. 6. N.M. Bikales, and J. 
    Conrad, eds. New York, NY: Interscience Publishers, pp. 209-271. 
    (1967).
        (24) JRB Associates. ``TSCA Section 4 Human Exposure Assessment: 
    Glycidol and its Derivatives (Final Report).'' (February 4, 1982).
        (25) Versar, Inc. ``Consumer Exposure to the Glycidols (Draft 
    Final Report).'' (December 1, 1983).
    
    VII. Regulatory Assessment Requirements
    
        The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has approved the 
    information collection requirements contained in this Consent Order 
    under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, 44 U.S.C. 
    3501 et seq., and has assigned OMB control number 2070-0033.
        Public reporting burden for this collection of information is 
    estimated to average 586 hours per response. The estimates include time 
    for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering 
    and maintaining the data needed, and completing the collection of 
    information.
    
    List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 799
    
        Chemicals, Chemical export, Environmental protection, Hazardous 
    substances, Health effects, Laboratories, Reporting and recordkeeping 
    requirements, and Testing.
    
        Dated: July 8, 1994.
    
    Susan H. Wayland,
    Acting Assistant Administrator for Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic 
    Substances.
    
        Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I, subchapter R, part 799 is amended as 
    follows:
    
    PART 799--[AMENDED]
    
        1. The authority citation continues to read as follows:
        Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2603, 2611, 2625.
    
        2. Section 799.5000 is amended by revising the section heading to 
    read as set forth below and by adding bisphenol A diglycidyl ether to 
    the table in CAS Number order, to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 799.5000   Testing Consent Orders for Substances and Mixtures with 
    Chemical Abstract Service Registry Numbers.
    
      
    * * * * *
    
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                          Substance or                       FR Publication 
       CAS Number        Mixture name         Testing             date      
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                            
                                  * * * * * * *                             
    4675-54-3........  Bisphenol A        Health effects    August 1, 1994  
                        diglycidyl ether  Exposure                          
                                           evaluation                       
                                                                            
                                  * * * * * * *                             
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    [FR Doc. 94-18560 Filed 7-29-94; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6560-50-F
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
08/01/1994
Department:
Environmental Protection Agency
Entry Type:
Uncategorized Document
Action:
Final Consent Agreement and Order; Final rule.
Document Number:
94-18560
Dates:
August 1, 1994.
Pages:
0-0 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Federal Register: August 1, 1994, OPPTS-42168, FRL 4642-3
CFR: (1)
40 CFR 799.5000