95-18788. Dried Prunes Produced in California; Expenses and Assessment Rate  

  • [Federal Register Volume 60, Number 147 (Tuesday, August 1, 1995)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 39107-39108]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 95-18788]
    
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
    7 CFR Part 993
    
    [Docket No. FV95-993-1IFR]
    
    
    Dried Prunes Produced in California; Expenses and Assessment Rate
    
    AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
    
    ACTION: Interim final rule with request for comments.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This interim final rule authorizes expenditures and 
    establishes an assessment rate under Marketing Order No. 993 for the 
    1995-96 crop year. Authorization of this budget enables the Prune 
    Marketing Committee (Committee) to incur expenses that are reasonable 
    and necessary to administer the program. Funds to administer this 
    program are derived from assessments on handlers.
    
    DATES: Effective beginning August 1, 1995, through July 31, 1996. 
    Comments received by August 31, 1995, will be considered prior to 
    issuance of a final rule.
    
    ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments 
    concerning this action. Comments must be sent in triplicate to the 
    Docket Clerk, Fruit and Vegetable Division, AMS, USDA, P.O. Box 96456, 
    room 2523-S, Washington, DC 20090-6456, FAX 202-720-5698. Comments 
    should reference the docket number and the date and page number of this 
    issue of the Federal Register and will be available for public 
    inspection in the Office of the Docket Clerk during regular business 
    hours.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
    Martha Sue Clark, Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit and 
    Vegetable Division, AMS, USDA, P.O. Box 96456, room 2523-S, Washington, 
    DC 20090-6456, telephone 202-720-9918; or Richard P. Van Diest, 
    California Marketing Field Office, Fruit and Vegetable Division, AMS, 
    USDA, suite 102B, 2202 Monterey Street, Fresno, California 93721, 
    telephone 209-487-5901.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule is issued under Marketing 
    Agreement and Order No. 993, both as amended (7 CFR part 993), 
    regulating the handling of dried prunes produced in California. The 
    marketing agreement and order are effective under the Agricultural 
    Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674), 
    hereinafter referred to as the Act.
        The Department of Agriculture (Department) is issuing this rule in 
    conformance with Executive Order 12866.
        This interim final rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 
    12778, Civil Justice Reform. Under the provisions of the marketing 
    order now in effect, California prunes are subject to assessments. It 
    is intended that the assessment rate as issued herein will be 
    applicable to all assessable prunes handled during the 1995-96 crop 
    year, which begins August 1, 1995, and ends July 31, 1996. This interim 
    final rule will not preempt any State or local laws, regulations, or 
    policies, unless they present an irreconcilable conflict with this 
    rule.
        The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted 
    before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the 
    Act, any handler subject to an order may file with the Secretary a 
    petition stating that the order, any provisions of the order, or any 
    obligation imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance 
    with law and requesting a modification of the order or to be exempted 
    therefrom. Such handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on 
    the petition. After the hearing the Secretary would rule on the 
    petition. The Act provides that the district court of the United States 
    in any district in which the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or 
    her principal place of business has jurisdiction in equity to review 
    the Secretary's ruling on the petition, provided a bill in equity is 
    filed not later than 20 days after the date of the entry of the ruling.
        Pursuant to the requirements set forth in the Regulatory 
    Flexibility Act (RFA), the Administrator of the Agricultural Marketing 
    Service (AMS) has considered the economic impact of this rule on small 
    entities.
        The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of 
    business subject to such actions in order that small businesses will 
    not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued 
    pursuant to the Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are unique in 
    that they are brought about through group action of essentially small 
    entities acting on their own behalf. Thus, both statutes have small 
    entity orientation and compatibility.
        There are approximately 1,360 producers of California dried prunes 
    under this marketing order, and approximately 20 handlers. Small 
    agricultural producers have been defined by the Small Business 
    Administration (13 CFR 121.601) as those having annual receipts of less 
    than $500,000, and small agricultural service firms are defined as 
    those whose annual receipts are less than $5,000,000. The majority of 
    California dried prune producers and handlers may be classified as 
    small entities.
        The budget of expenses for the 1995-96 crop year was prepared by 
    the Prune Marketing Committee, the agency responsible for local 
    administration of the marketing order, and submitted to the Department 
    of Agriculture for approval. The members of the Committee are producers 
    and handlers of California dried prunes. They are familiar with the 
    Committee's needs and with the costs of goods and services in their 
    local area and are thus in a position to formulate an appropriate 
    budget. The budget was formulated and discussed in a public meeting. 
    Thus, all directly affected persons have had an opportunity to 
    participate and provide input.
        The assessment rate recommended by the Committee was derived by 
    dividing anticipated expenses by expected shipments of dried California 
    prunes. Because that rate will be applied to actual shipments, it must 
    be established at a rate that will provide sufficient income to pay the 
    Committee's expenses.
        The Committee met June 22, 1995, and unanimously recommended a 
    1995-96 budget of $275,280, $5,080 more than the previous year. Budget 
    items for 1995-96 which have increased compared to those budgeted for 
    1994-95 (in parentheses) are: Executive salaries, $87,980 ($83,850), 
    clerical salaries, $19,440 ($18,650), office rent, $22,000 ($21,500), 
    postage and messenger, $5,500 ($5,000), rental of equipment, $3,000 
    ($500), purchase of equipment, $5,000 ($4,500), acreage survey, $10,500 
    ($10,000), and reserve for contingencies, $19,310 ($19,250). Items 
    which have decreased compared to the amount budgeted for 1994-95 (in 
    parentheses) are: Employee benefits $15,400 
    
    [[Page 39108]]
    ($15,800), repairs and maintenance, $3,000 ($4,000), stationary and 
    printing, $4,000 ($6,500), and Committee travel, $9,000 ($9,500). All 
    other items are budgeted at last year's amounts.
        The Committee also unanimously recommended an assessment rate of 
    $1.55 per salable ton, $0.05 less than the previous year. This rate, 
    when applied to anticipated shipments of 177,600 salable tons, will 
    yield $275,280 in assessment income, which will be adequate to cover 
    budgeted expenses. Any funds not expended by the Committee during a 
    crop year may be used, pursuant to Sec. 993.81(c), for a period of five 
    months subsequent to that crop year. At the end of such period, the 
    excess funds are returned or credited to handlers.
        While this action will impose some additional cost on handlers, the 
    costs are in the form of uniform assessments on handlers. Some of the 
    additional costs may be passed on to producers. However, these costs 
    will be offset by the benefits derived by the operation of the 
    marketing order. Therefore, the Administrator of the AMS has determined 
    that this action will not have a significant economic impact on a 
    substantial number of small entities.
        After consideration of all relevant matter presented, including the 
    information and recommendations submitted by the Committee and other 
    available information, it is hereby found that this rule, as 
    hereinafter set forth, will tend to effectuate the declared policy of 
    the Act.
        Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, it is also found and determined upon good 
    cause that it is impracticable, unnecessary, and contrary to the public 
    interest to give preliminary notice prior to putting this rule into 
    effect and that good cause exists for not postponing the effective date 
    of this action until 30 days after publication in the Federal Register 
    because: (1) The Committee needs to have sufficient funds to pay its 
    expenses which are incurred on a continuous basis, (2) the crop year 
    begins on August 1, 1995, and the marketing order requires that the 
    rate of assessment for the fiscal period apply to all assessable 
    California prunes handled during the crop year; (3) handlers are aware 
    of this action which was unanimously recommended by the Committee at a 
    public meeting and is similar to other budget actions issued in past 
    years; and (4) this interim final rule provides a 30-day comment 
    period, and all comments timely received will be considered prior to 
    finalization of this action.
    
    List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 993
    
        Marketing agreements, Plums, Prunes, Reporting and recordkeeping 
    requirements.
    
        For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 7 CFR part 993 is 
    amended as follows:
    
    PART 993--DRIED PRUNES PRODUCED IN CALIFORNIA
    
        1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 993 continues to read as 
    follows:
    
        Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601-674.
    
        2. A new Sec. 993.346 is added to read as follows:
    
        Note: This section will not appear in the Code of Federal 
    Regulations.
    
    
    Sec. 993.346  Expenses and assessment rate.
    
        Expenses of $275,280 by the Prune Marketing Committee are 
    authorized, and an assessment rate of $1.55 per salable ton of dried 
    prunes is established for the crop year ending July 31, 1996. 
    Unexpended funds may be carried over as a reserve within the 
    limitations specified in Sec. 993.81(c).
    
        Date: July 26, 1995.
    Sharon Bomer Lauritsen,
    Deputy Director, Fruit and Vegetable Division.
    [FR Doc. 95-18788 Filed 7-31-95; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 3410-02-P-M
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
8/1/1995
Published:
08/01/1995
Department:
Agriculture Department
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Interim final rule with request for comments.
Document Number:
95-18788
Dates:
Effective beginning August 1, 1995, through July 31, 1996. Comments received by August 31, 1995, will be considered prior to issuance of a final rule.
Pages:
39107-39108 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. FV95-993-1IFR
PDF File:
95-18788.pdf
CFR: (1)
7 CFR 993.346