97-20372. Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change by the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc.  

  • [Federal Register Volume 62, Number 148 (Friday, August 1, 1997)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 41454-41456]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 97-20372]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
    
    [Release No. 34-38879; File No. SR-NASD-97-52]
    
    
    Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change by the National 
    Association of Securities Dealers, Inc.
    
    July 28, 1997.
        Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule 
    Change by the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. 
    Relating to Extension of the Large and Complex Case Rule and Making 
    Application of the Rule Voluntary and Order Granting Temporary 
    Accelerated Approval of Extension of Effectiveness of the Current 
    Pilot.
    
        Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
    (``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that 
    on July 22, 1997 \3\, the National Association of Securities Dealers, 
    Inc. (``NASD'' or
    
    [[Page 41455]]
    
    ``Association'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission 
    (``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and 
    II below, which Items have been prepared by the self-regulatory 
    organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit 
    comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. For the 
    reasons discussed below, the Commission is also granting temporary 
    accelerated approval of an extension of the effectiveness of Rule 10334 
    of the NASD's Code of Arbitration Procedure.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
        \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
        \3\ The NASD filed Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule change 
    on July 25, 1997, the substance of which is incorporated into the 
    notice. See letter from Elliott R. Curzon, Assistant General 
    Counsel, NASDR, to Katherine A. England, Assistant Director, Market 
    Regulation, Commission, dated July 25, 1997 (``Amendment No. 1'').
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance 
    of the Proposed Rule Change
    
        NASD Regulation is proposing to amend Rule 10334 of the NASD's Code 
    of Arbitration Procedure (``Code'') to extend the effectiveness of Rule 
    10334 to August 1, 2001, and to make application of Rule 10334 
    voluntary. Below is the text of the proposed rule change. Proposed new 
    language is in italics; proposed deletions are in brackets.
    
    10334. Procedures for Large and Complex Cases
    
    (a) Applicability
    * * * * *
        (2) Any eligible matter shall be scheduled for an Administrative 
    Conference pursuant to paragraph (b), below, only if the parties 
    jointly file a written request for such a conference with the 
    appropriate Office of Dispute Resolution. An eligible matter shall not 
    be eligible for further proceedings under this Rule following the 
    Administrative Conference unless all parties agree in writing and 
    submit the agreement to the appropriate Office of Dispute Resolution.
    * * * * *
    (c) Appointment of Arbitrators
        (1) Eligible matters shall be heard and determined by a panel of 
    three arbitrators, at least one of [which] whom shall be an attorney; 
    provided, however, that the parties may agree to submit an eligible 
    matter to a single mutually acceptable arbitrator selected pursuant to 
    the provisions of this paragraph (c).
    * * * * *
    (h) Temporary Effectiveness
        This Rule shall remain in effect until August 1, [1997] 2002 unless 
    modified or extended prior thereto by the Board of Governors.
    
    II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
    Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
    
        In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization 
    included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the 
    proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the 
    proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at 
    the places specified in Item IV below. The self-regulatory organization 
    has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of the 
    most significant aspects of such statements.
    
    A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
    Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
    
    1. Purpose
        Rule 10334 provides special procedures for large and complex cases. 
    The rule became effective for one year on May 2, 1995, was extended, 
    and is now due to expire on August 1, 1997. Any claim where the amount 
    in controversy is $1 million or more, or where all parties agree, is 
    eligible for disposition under the procedures.
        Currently, Rule 10334 requires that the parties in any eligible 
    case participate in an administrative conference with a member of the 
    staff of the Office of Dispute Resolution (``Office''). The purpose of 
    the conference is to permit the parties and staff to develop a plan for 
    administering the case, including planning for discovery and narrowing 
    the issues to be decided at the hearing. Application of all other 
    provisions of the Rule to a case is completely voluntary.
        Rule 10334 was developed to meet the special needs of parties in 
    large and complex cases, including the need for arbitrators with 
    particular experience and the need in some cases for additional 
    discovery, including the availability of depositions. NASD Regulation's 
    experience in the two years that Rule 10334 has been effective is that 
    few parties use the procedures. From May 2, 1995 until January 28, 
    1997, 880 cases were eligible for treatment under Rule 10334. Parties 
    agreed to proceed under Rule 10334, however, in only 43 cases.
        NASD Regulation has found that parties are deterred from using 
    these procedures by the extra compensation paid to arbitrators and the 
    additional administrative fees required under Rule 10334. At the same 
    time, NASD Regulation found that one of the most attractive aspects of 
    Rule 10334 is the availability of a list selection procedure for the 
    appointment of arbitrators, which is not yet generally available for 
    other types of arbitration cases.
        In addition, the attractiveness of the procedures may be affected 
    by the required administrative conference with the staff. This 
    conference may be beneficial in assisting the parties to develop a road 
    map for a proceeding, even if the parties do not agree to use other 
    procedures under Rule 10334. However, the requirement that the 
    administrative conference be conducted in all cases over $1 million, 
    regardless of whether the parties plan to proceed under Rule 10334, 
    creates a cost burden to the parties and to the Office.
        Accordingly, NASD Regulation is proposing to amend the Rule 10334 
    to provide for an administrative conference with the staff only if all 
    parties request such a conference in writing. The procedures will be 
    available if the parties voluntarily agree to proceed with an 
    administrative conference and to develop a written agreement to proceed 
    under Rule 10334. The elimination of the requirement for an 
    administrative conference in all cases should result in reduced costs 
    to the parties and to NASD Regulation. An administrative conference 
    will, however, continue to be a prerequisite to the use of the special 
    procedures provided by Rule 10334.
        In addition, NASD Regulation is proposing to amend Rule 10334 to 
    extend the Rule for five more years to August 1, 2002. By extending the 
    rule for five years, NASD Regulation will gain experience with the 
    procedures based on voluntary use of the administrative conference, and 
    will be better able to determine whether to continue them in effect, 
    either temporarily or permanently.
    2. Statutory Basis
        NASD Regulation believes that the proposed rule change is 
    consistent with the provisions of Section 15A(b)(6) of the Act \4\ in 
    that extending the effectiveness of the procedures for large and 
    complex cases and making their use voluntary will serve the public 
    interest by enhancing the satisfaction and perceived fairness of such 
    proceedings by the parties to the proceedings.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \4\ 15 U.S.C. 78o-3.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
    
        The NASD does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose 
    any burden on competition.
    
    [[Page 41456]]
    
    C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
    Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others
    
        No written comments were either solicited or received.
    
    III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 
    Commission Action
    
        The NASD requests the Commission to find good cause, pursuant to 
    section 19(b)(2) of the Act, for temporarily approving an extension of 
    Rule 10334 prior to the thirtieth day after publication in the Federal 
    Register. The Commission finds that extending Rule 10334 pending final 
    action by the Commission on the proposed rule change is consistent with 
    the requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder 
    applicable to a national securities association and, in particular, the 
    requirements of section 15A(b)(6) of the Act.\5\ The Commission finds 
    good cause for approving the temporary extension of Rule 10334 prior 
    the thirtieth day after the date of publication of notice of filing 
    thereof in the Federal Register in that temporary accelerated approval 
    will benefit users of the arbitration process in that providing a 
    temporary extension of the Procedures will permit arbitration 
    participants to continue to use the Procedures. In addition, except 
    with respect to the administrative conference required under the Rule, 
    the current application of Rule 10334 to any case submitted to 
    arbitration is voluntary. Thus, temporarily accelerating the approval 
    of Rule 10334 while simultaneously requesting comment on the five year 
    extension of the program and the amendment to make the entire program 
    voluntary in nature will permit the NASD to maintain the continuity of 
    the process will not have any adverse impact on the investing public.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        Within 35 days of the date of publication of this notice in the 
    Federal Register or within such longer period (i) as the Commission may 
    designate up to 90 days of such date if it finds such longer period to 
    be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to 
    which the self-regulatory organization consents, the Commission will:
        A. By order approved such proposed rule change, or
        B. Institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule 
    change should be disapproved.
    
    IV. Solicitation of Comments
    
        Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and 
    arguments concerning the foregoing. Persons making written submissions 
    should file six copies thereof with the Secretary, Securities and 
    Exchange Commission, 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549. 
    Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written 
    statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with 
    the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed 
    rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those 
    that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions 
    of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and copying at the 
    Commission's Public Reference Room. Copies of such filing will also be 
    available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the 
    NASD. All submissions should refer to File No. SR-NASD-97-52 and should 
    be submitted by August 22, 1997.
        It is therefore ordered, pursuant to section 19(b)(2) \6\ that NASD 
    Rule 10334 is temporarily extended until the Commission takes final 
    action on the present proposal.
    
        \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, 
    pursuant to delegated authority.\7\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \7\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Margaret H. McFarland,
    Deputy Secretary.
    [FR Doc. 97-20372 Filed 7-31-97; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
08/01/1997
Department:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
97-20372
Pages:
41454-41456 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Release No. 34-38879, File No. SR-NASD-97-52
PDF File:
97-20372.pdf